Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Byron York - New Surge of Illegals Climb American Borders for American Jobs, OBAMAcare, Food Stamps, Anchor Baby Welfare and LA RAZA SUPREMACY Over Legals

LA RAZA KNOWS FULLY THAT OBAMA’S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMIN AND LA RAZA JANET ARE KEEPING THE BORDERS WIDE OPEN FOR HORDES MORE TO JUMP FOR AMNESTY.

“But in the last year or so, there have been signs of an increase, and now a new poll suggests many Mexicans would come to the U.S. if they had the chance. And many of them would come illegally if necessary.”
*

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS LONG PROPAGANDIZED THAT THERE WERE ONLY 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN THIS COUNTRY. THERE THAT MANY IN CA ALONE. MOST FIGURES PUT THE FIGURE AT 40 MILLION…now go do the math!

The Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project released a survey Monday to help set the stage for President Obama's visit to Mexico later this week. In 1,000 in-person interviews conducted across Mexico last month, Pew researchers asked, in Spanish, "If at this moment, you had the means and opportunity to go to live in the United States, would you go?" Thirty-five percent of those surveyed said yes.

The population of Mexico is about 110 million. If the Pew numbers are correct, that means about 38 million would like to live in the U.S.

Byron York: Could there be another wave of illegal immigration?

April 29, 2013 | 9:00 pm

Byron York

Chief Political Correspondent
One argument often heard in the debate over comprehensive immigration reform is that the flow of illegal immigrants from Mexico to the United States, once measured in the hundreds of thousands per year, has slowed dramatically and is not likely to pick up again.
"All across Mexico's ruddy central plains, most of the people who could go north already have," reported the New York Times in early April. "[P]ast experience and current trends in both Mexico and the United States suggest that legalization would not lead to a sudden flood of illegal immigration on the scale of what occurred after 1986."
THE NEW YORK TIMES IS MEXICAN OWNED AND IS NOW THE MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY!

Some reformers have cited stories like the Times' to suggest there's no need for sweeping new border security or workplace enforcement measures; illegal immigration is on the decline anyway.
It is true that net migration from Mexico fell to virtually nothing during the depths of the Great Recession. That did not mean Mexicans stopped coming to the U.S., but rather that the number of Mexicans entering the U.S. and the number leaving were about the same. But in the last year or so, there have been signs of an increase, and now a new poll suggests many Mexicans would come to the U.S. if they had the chance. And many of them would come illegally if necessary.
The Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project released a survey Monday to help set the stage for President Obama's visit to Mexico later this week. In 1,000 in-person interviews conducted across Mexico last month, Pew researchers asked, in Spanish, "If at this moment, you had the means and opportunity to go to live in the United States, would you go?" Thirty-five percent of those surveyed said yes.
The population of Mexico is about 110 million. If the Pew numbers are correct, that means about 38 million would like to live in the U.S.
Going into a little more detail, Pew found 20 percent of all Mexicans would be "inclined to go work and live in the U.S. without authorization." That's about 22 million people who might come to the U.S. illegally, if they had the chance.
"The story line that we've been hearing that Mexican immigration to the U.S. is now over is simply not true," says Mark Krikorian, head of the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors stricter immigration enforcement. "It could well be that we won't see the same level of Mexican illegal immigration that we saw in the '90s and '00s, but if 38 million people want to come here, that's a lot of people."
The Pew study offers mixed evidence on the magnetic pull of the United States economy for poor Mexicans. On the one hand, Pew asked Mexicans whether people who left their country for the U.S. "have a better life [in the U.S.], a worse life there, or is life neither better nor worse there?" Forty-seven percent of respondents said immigrants to the U.S. had a better life, versus 18 percent who said they had a worse life and 29 percent who said neither. That 47 percent figure is a bit lower than in recent years.

On the other hand, when Pew asked Mexicans whether their friends or relatives who moved to the U.S. had achieved their goals or been disappointed, 70 percent said they had achieved their goals, versus 25 percent who said they had been disappointed.
Finally, Pew found Mexican goodwill toward the United States has risen significantly in the last few years. Favorable attitudes toward the U.S. plunged after the passage of the Arizona immigration law in 2010. At that point, 48 percent of Mexicans said they viewed the U.S. unfavorably, versus 44 percent who viewed the U.S. favorably. Now, the numbers are 66 percent favorable, 30 percent unfavorable.
Put the Pew figures together, and they suggest that large-scale new immigration from Mexico, illegal as well as legal, is entirely possible. Not only are many Mexicans inclined to come to the U.S., but many of the reasons holding them back -- dreadful American economic conditions being the biggest -- could change in the future. Conditions in Mexico could change, too, in a direction that spurs more people to leave.
And that could mean a new wave of illegal immigration. "What it all adds up to is that there are always going to be significant numbers of Mexicans who are going to want to come here, regardless of our laws," says Krikorian. "So border security, and more broadly immigration security, is not something we can dispense with."

Byron York, The Washington Examiner's chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and Friday, and his stories and blog posts appear on washingtonexaminer.com.


HERITAGE FOUNDATION: OBAMA’S AMNESTY WOULD ADD 100 MORE ILLEGALS AND COST AMERICANS (Legals) BILLIONS AND BILLIONS


Obama’s Promise of Homeland Security to Americans (Legals) and his Vow to Illegals of Open and Undefended Borders With Narcomex


The OBAMA – McCAIN Amnesty Promises NO E-VERIFY enforcement to Employers and NO BORDER enforcement to LA RAZA invaders.

…isn’t that what we already have going ????

Dream Act proposals are also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will fraudulently claim they came here as children or that they are under 30. And the federal government has no way to check whether their claims are true or not.  REP. LAMAR SMITH


"It lets businesses that knowingly violated the law off the hook," Mr. Krikorian said. "If they were not withholding payroll taxes, they’re held harmless. If they were violating labor laws, they’re held harmless. So this is a boon for crooked business."… MARK KRIKORIAN

“Another force for amnesty is corporate America. Thousands of businesses have hired illegals in violation of U.S. law. Amnesty for their illegal workers means, de facto, amnesty for them”… PAT BUCHANAN

ARIZONA

Whose Country Is This?


Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010

With the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
He has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.
OBMAMA’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE… plus illegals get all the jobs!
“Since President Obama came into office, SNAP participation has increased at 10 times the rate of job creation, the annual spending on SNAP has doubled, and one in seven Americans now participates in SNAP,”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/04/obama-rushes-to-expand-la-raza-welfare_26.html

TOP – STEALTH AMNESTY... Obama and McCain greet new invaders at the open borders!
Is the CIA Investigation the OBAMA – McCAIN Amnesty as a Surrender of American Sovereignty to Mexico?


THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR: The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.

THESE FIGURES ARE VERY DATED. THEY ARE ALSO PREDICATED ON A POPULATION OF ILLEGALS AT ABOUT 11 MILLION, WHICH IS ENTIRELY LA RAZA DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA. THE REAL NUMBERS, EVEN FROM DHS IS ABOUT 40 MILLION AND BREEDING (AT OUR EXPENSE) LIKE BUNNIES. NOW DO THE FIGURES FOR HOW MANY “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS WILL BE IN OUR JOBS, PUSHING OUR ANCHOR BABIES FOR 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, LOOTING WELFARE AND OBAMACARE….?
(from the article)

The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/anchor-baby-breeding-mexicos-staggering.html

 
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
 

from the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html

What will America stand for in 2050?

The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.

from the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html

…and still they sabotage E-VERIFY to ease more illegals into our jobs!

FEDS PREDICT SOARING UNEMPLOYMENT UNTIL PAST 2015… Good time for amnesty?


Obama and Justice Sotomayor (A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER) Vow to Illegals to SABOTAGE E-verify!

VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?


REP. LAMAR SMITH HAS CONSISTENTLY AND OPENLY VOICED OPPOSITION TO OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON OUR BORDERS AND JOBS… even as most politicians HISPANDER for the illegals’ ILLEGAL VOTES.

 Obama soft on illegals enforcement


Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.

The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.

MORE OBAMA DREAM ACTS of WELFARE for ILLEGALS?

REP. LAMAR SMITH for PRESIDENT


"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."  REP. LAMAR SMITH

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing "La Reconquista" in California."

A Question of Citizenship… IN MEXIFORNIA, ILLEGALS HAVE MORE RIGHTS THAN LEGALS!

A Commentary By Debra J. Saunders

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Trust Republicans to go too far. They take a good idea -- such as the notion that the federal government should enforce immigration laws, and states should be able to help -- and then drive it into the fringes. Witness a Fox News interview in which Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., declared, "We should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally, and you have a child, that child is automatically not a citizen."

Graham has supported a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He opposed the new Arizona immigration law. So why would he advocate repealing part of the 14th Amendment -- which, by the way, exists because the Grand Old Party wanted to stop efforts to keep freed slaves from becoming citizens?

Graham's right about this much: Illegal immigrants have taken advantage of the law. The Dallas Morning News reported Sunday that 60,000 babies are born annually in Texas to illegal immigrants. Last year, these "anchor babies" accounted for 16 percent of the state's births.

But it's not clear how many illegal immigrants are coming here to have babies as opposed to having babies in America because they are here.

Then there's the recent Washington Post story about "birth tourism" and affluent expectant mothers paying offshore consultants a $14,750 fee to obtain tourism visas that allow them to give birth in the United States and win U.S. citizenship for their babies.

No one likes to see adults game the system. In June, pollster Scott Rasmussen found that 58 percent of voters say a child born to an illegal immigrant should not automatically become a citizen of the United States.

But there are better ways to deal with those abuses. Direct the State Department to deny visas to would-be birth tourists. Keep the heat on employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. The new Arizona immigration law is designed to achieve "attrition through enforcement." Deport more adults who, unlike children, knowingly break the law.

But some Republicans want to keep going. Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, is arguing that the 14th Amendment does not and never did confer automatic birthright citizenship.

Section One states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

"There are two elements, birth and subject to the jurisdiction," Chapman University Law School Dean John C. Eastman told me. "For about 50 years, we've just assumed birth was all you needed." But a review of the original debates and early court cases demonstrates a recognition that parents had to "show allegiance." If they broke federal law, they "never qualified" as being under U.S. jurisdiction.

This is where the argument gets dicey. Eastman has argued that a child born to a Saudi in the United States on a temporary student visa was not under U.S. jurisdiction, as the father had not declared allegiance to America. Eastman's answer is to let people come here to study or work, but as something less than guests.
This path could turn a melting pot nation into an empire of the native born and law-abiding foreign workers who never have a chance to belong. Think Old Europe. Think Saudi Arabia.

But don't think

MORE welfare and JOBS for ILLEGALS and no real border security…


AMNESTY from OBAMA and MEXICO’S GANG of LA RAZA 8

THE LIES, the SPIN and then MORE LIES and then MORE WELFARE:
Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio told Fox News that newly-legalized immigrants will be given a provisional status and “will have to stay in that status until at least ten years elapse and [border security] triggers are met," but loopholes could create a fast track for some illegal immigrants.

 

 

 

 

No comments: