Monday, June 30, 2014

THE CLINTONS: GETTING (RICHER) SERVING THE 1% - NOW THEY JUST NEED THE ILLEGALS' VOTES! How Bill Clinton cashed in after leaving White House

How Bill Clinton cashed in after leaving White House

THE OBAMAnation must be peeing his britches wondering how much he will ultimately make making "speeches" to his crony bankster donors! These pols would all sell us out for a buck. Have and will again!

The enormous amount of money made, putting the couple securely in the top 0.1 percent of income earners in the richest country in the world, belies the ridiculous claim that the Clintons are not “truly well off.”

How Bill Clinton cashed in after leaving White House

By Gabriel Black
30 June 2014
Last Thursday, the Washington Post released a report detailing the $104.9 million that former president Bill Clinton has made from speaking fees since leaving office.

How Bill Clinton cashed in after leaving White House

By Gabriel Black
30 June 2014
Last Thursday, the Washington Post released a report detailing the $104.9 million that former president Bill Clinton has made from speaking fees since leaving office.

The report comes a few days after Hillary Clinton was lambasted by students at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas for charging a $225,000 speaking fee, and a week after she told the Guardian that she was “unlike” the “truly well off.”

The data on speaking engagements, which stops in 2013, when Hillary left office as secretary of state, covers 542 speeches made by Bill Clinton. Almost all of his 542 speaking engagements netted him more than $100,000 apiece. On one occasion, Clinton made $1.3 million from an event that lasted two days.

The enormous amount of money made, putting the couple securely in the top 0.1 percent of income earners in the richest country in the world, belies the ridiculous claim that the Clintons are not “truly well off.”

Using the data from the Post, the WSWS calculates that Bill Clinton made an average of $193,609 per speech. This amount is roughly four times the annual income of the median American family, all for a single speech. In 2012, his most profitable year, Clinton pulled in $16.3 million from speaking. Data from 2013 is unavailable because the family is no longer required to report such earnings, as neither holds public office any longer. With Hillary adding to the family’s income with her book tours, 2013 was likely a higher figure.

This did not stop Hillary Clinton, who also regularly makes hundreds of thousands of dollars for speeches, from telling the Guardian that she was not part of America’s income inequality “problem.” She told the newspaper that the American people “don’t see me as part of the problem, because we pay ordinary income tax, unlike a lot of people who are truly well off, not to name names; and we’ve done it through dint of hard work.”

By hard work, Hillary Clinton is likely referring to the extensive deregulation of the financial industry successfully overseen by her husband.

In 1999, Bill Clinton signed the Financial Services Modernization Act, the most sweeping banking deregulation bill in American history. The bill virtually lifted all restraints on the operation of the giant financial monopolies that dominate the world economy. The bill did away with all sorts of restrictions imposed by the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, opening up the way for the use of tools and techniques that provoked the financial collapse of 2008.

Indeed, the Clintons have been hard at work, humbly serving the private interests of Wall Street. Bill’s speaking fees from Wall Street are more or less political bribes, thanking him for a job well done and keeping the relationship well oiled to allow for political favors, perhaps if Hillary takes office in 2016.

Bill Clinton’s engagement list is littered with the banks, hedge funds and other investment groups that were able to gorge themselves on the financial prize and plunder that Clinton made available. Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Morgan Stanley, UBS, Merrill Lynch, ING, SkyBridge Capital, Visa, American Express, Bank of America, TD Bank, Fidelity Investments, JP Morgan, Barclays … all hired Clinton for all sorts of occasions and all of these banks and financial institutions greatly benefited from Clinton’s sweeping reform.

In total, Bill Clinton has spoken 102 times for the financial industry. Many banks have hired him multiple times. Clinton has spoken eight times for Goldman Sachs. The investment bank alone has paid $1.35 million for Clinton’s speaking fees. Clinton has netted a total of $19.6 million from Wall Street banks and financial service groups.

This fall, Hillary Clinton will speak at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas (UNLV). She is currently promoting her book Hard Choices, about her four years as secretary of state. The Student Relations Director of UNLV, Daniel Waqar, told Ralston Reports why students were protesting her visit: “You could give scholarships to thousands of students, benefit research on campus, give more students grants for research and studying.”

Waqar also noted that tuition is set to increase by 17 percent at the school and that many students were financially burdened. The student body president made a statement asking Clinton to return some or all of the money to higher education in the form of a donation.

The Republican Party has jumped on the occasion of the Clintons’ obscene paychecks to pose as defenders of the common American. Tim Miller, executive director of the anti-Clinton super PAC, America Rising, has denounced Clinton for accepting a fee that is more than four times the average income of a Nevadan.

However, the Clinton’s fortune is nothing out of the ordinary. More than half of the US Congress is composed of millionaires. Former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who famously declared, “I’m not concerned about the very poor,” had a net worth of between $190 million and $250 million when he ran for president in 2012.

THEY LIE LIKE POLITICIANS, HISPANDER LIKE THE OBAMANATION, AND SERVE THE 1% AS ALWAYS. THEIR “SPEAKING FEES” IN THE MILLIONS ARE SIMPLY PAY OFFS OR BRIBES FROM THE SPECIAL INTERESTS THEY HAVE ALWAYS SERVED.


REMEMBER HOW THE CLINTONS TURNED THE WHITE

HOUSE INTO A WHORE'S HOUSE FOR THE SPECIAL

INTERESTS WITH FOREIGNER THAT WERE "GENEROUS"

TO THE CLINTONS STAYED IN THE LINCOLN

BEDROOM???

WE'RE BACK!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  
“The Clintons still feel the need to feign that they are still in touch with the struggles of regular Americans,” said Tim Miller, the communications director for America Rising. “He laments being the president with the ‘lowest net worth’ which is akin to saying his floors are made of the cheapest marble. Then he goes on to say that they talk with people in their town. They live in one of the most elite, moneyed towns in America. 

“The Clintons have lived in a 1 percent bubble for so long, their experience has become warped, and that’s a major problem in a presidential campaign,” Miller added. The couple’s home is in Chappaqua, N.Y.


HILLARY and BILLARY… collecting their back-end bribes from all the rich they served so well!

GETTING RICH FOR SERVING THE RICH… and what have they done for America again??? I forget… again!


 HILLARY CLINTON… just follow the dirty money… IT ONLY LEADS TO THEIR DIRTY DEEDS


 HILLARY LA RAZA

Will Hillary Clinton’s long history of hispandering and promising LA RAZA Obama’s bit by bit amnesty and open borders deliver the illegals’ still illegal votes?


SHE’S BANKING ON IT! LEGAL WILL NOT BUY INTO HER CRAP LIKE THEY DID OBAMA’S “HOPE & CHANGE”.

THE REALITY OF THE PARTNERSHIP OF BILLARY, HILLARY, THE BUSH CRIME CLAN, AND THE OBAMANATION'S PARTNERSHIP WITH WALL STREET:

By hard work, Hillary Clinton is likely referring to the extensive deregulation of the financial industry successfully overseen by her husband...even as he passionately cut welfare for poor Americans (Legals).

SOARING WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, they also get our jobs AND SOARING POVERTY FOR AMERICANS who still get the tax bills for LA RAZA’S MEX WELFARE STATE IN our open borders.

The report demonstrates how nearly every section of society, except for the rich and super-rich, has seen a massive loss in wealth since 2003.

here's what the dems have done for LA RAZA ILLEGAL MEXICAN VOTERS:
 

LA RAZA-OCCUPATION and LOOTING in MEXIFORNIA…. shocking!
Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.


 
OBAMA’S LA RAZA RECOVERY… illegals landed millions of jobs and BILLIONS IN WELFARE!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/06/in-america-no-legal-need-apply-report.html

Hillary bellies up to Obama’s banksters – She
reeks of the smell of BRIBES and BAILOUTS






No comments: