And then there's all the tawdriness associated with the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Foundation, and being dead broke, and the $200,000 speaking fees from any schmuck who'll pay, and the Benghazi lies, and the email fiasco, and the overweening sense of entitlement, and on and on. It's just too much.
January 9, 2016
Is the Hive breaking up with Bill and Hillary?
The disciplined drones and diligent worker bees of the Hive do the Queen's* bidding, but they also provide feedback to the Queen from the world outside the Hive. This, in turn, informs the Queen's future instructions.
For a quarter-century the Hive has viciously swarmed anyone who dared describe Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and Hillary as his enabler. No more. The dam has been breached and the truth bared. If Bill Clinton's conduct does not fit the definition of a sexual predator, then the term is meaningless. If Hillary – in defending him, covering for him, lying for him, and besmirching his victims – is not an enabler, who is?
For a quarter-century the Hive has viciously swarmed anyone who dared describe Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and Hillary as his enabler. No more. The dam has been breached and the truth bared. If Bill Clinton's conduct does not fit the definition of a sexual predator, then the term is meaningless. If Hillary – in defending him, covering for him, lying for him, and besmirching his victims – is not an enabler, who is?
I think a couple things may be going on here. The strength of the Hive has waned, and its ability to control the narrative is in decline. Donald Trump, of all people, has proven too strong a force to be ignored. Even though, 20 years ago, alternative media was still in its infancy, one of its pioneers, Matt Drudge, was nonetheless able to break through the Hive's defenses and expose the Lewinsky affair. Today it's so strong it can occasionally overcome the Hive.
The Queen made a fateful decision in the spring of 1992, when Gennifer Flowers revealed her affair with Clinton. He was the only hope the Democrats had that year, and it was determined that he must be protected. The post-Super Bowl 60 Minutes interview, the pretty in pink press conference, the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy – all the stops were pulled. The Queen and the Hive went all in on Clinton, and they've been stuck with him ever since.
Until now. It's as though they're getting tired. The damned Clintons still keep up their outrageous behavior, and keep expecting the Queen to cover for them. It takes a lot of time and energy to destroy the Clintons' critics, and it's getting old. And then there's all the tawdriness associated with the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Foundation, and being dead broke, and the $200,000 speaking fees from any schmuck who'll pay, and the Benghazi lies, and the email fiasco, and the overweening sense of entitlement, and on and on. It's just too much.
You get the sense that even the Queen is getting sick of it all.
And then there are people like Joseph DiGenova and R. Emmett Tyrell, Jr. – people you can't just ignore – saying that the FBI is going to recommend indicting her. This has got to temper your enthusiasm in coming to her defense.
I've talked about black swans, like Timothy McVeigh, and how they can change the political dynamic. A Hillary indictment would be a golden swan, virtually guaranteeing a landslide win for any Republican, Trump included.
While I respect DiGenova and Tyrrell, I'm not a buyer. Obama won't let it happen. He'd rather take the heat from FBI director Comey's resignation. Nixon fired Archibald Cox, and Obama can fire anybody who wants to indict Hillary. I suppose there's a scenario where Obama would hang Hillary out to dry, but thinking that through would require delving into the deep reaches of Obama's psyche, something I'm unwilling to do.
Bill Clinton is a despicable man, like all sexual predators. He's also a coward, as the record of his predation shows. Approaching women in the manner he did to, say, Paula Jones is dangerous. Women like Paula may have boyfriends or fathers or brothers who would be willing to physically assault anyone who behaved as Clinton did. I know guys like that. Bones get broken. But Clinton waited until he was the governor of Arkansas to unleash his inner predator and was thus assured of state trooper protection from any retaliation. As I've said before. He's a punk.
A punk embraced, quite recently, with open arms by all the Bushes, 1, 2, and 3. He's such a great guy, they love hanging out with him.
And these are the people who are supposed to have class?
I’ll stick with my friends in flyover country.
*
The New York Times
Fritz Pettyjohn was the chairman of Reagan for President, Alaska, in 1979-1980; is a co-founder of the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force; and blogs daily at ReaganProject.com
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/is_the_hive_breaking_up_with_bill_and_hillary_.html#ixzz3wm4JNw74
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
The indictment of Bill Cosby for sexual assault could play an important role in the 2016 campaign.
On Comedy Central, leftist "fake news" anchor Larry Wilmore said even if Cosby isn't convicted, a trial is a good thing. "For too long, the women who have accused him of this crime were not being listened to, because they were being silenced by a powerful man and a complicit culture. And, now, finally, regardless of what happens next, they're being heard."
A powerful man, a complicit culture: sounds like Bill Clinton — except the real "news" media will never turn on him.
None of Bill Cosby's accusers were ever slimed by pundits. They've been treated with respect and with care because the alleged crime called for it.
But look how they treated Paula Jones. The body language from the start implied she was trailer trash and deserved it. Kathleen Willey? She was allegedly groped by Clinton, so she was more trash begging to presidentially pawed. Juanita Broaddrick? She accused the president of rape, and the media walked away, never wanting a real answer.
On Nov. 22, Hillary Clinton had the denialist chutzpah to tweet this about campus rape policies: "Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported." This from the same woman who oversaw "bimbo" patrols to destroy the reputation of any woman who alleged any sexual misconduct by her lecherous husband.
On Jan. 6, Juanita Broaddrick responded on Twitter: "I was 35 when Ark. Attorney General Bill Clinton raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73 .... it never goes away."
Broaddrick told her story about the alleged 1978 assault on the Feb. 24, 1999 edition of "Dateline NBC." In a C-SPAN interview last August, her NBC interviewer Lisa Myers said, "Nothing has come up since that story was reported that in any way undercuts what Juanita Broaddrick said."
Her horrific story brought forth the imagery of Bill Clinton biting down on this woman's lip as he violently attacked her — Broaddrick in shock, her lip bloody and swollen, her underwear torn — and then Clinton putting on his shades and saying, "You better put some ice on that" as he left the room.
And in reply, the president never had to say more to the press than legalese: "My counsel has made a statement about the first issue and I have nothing to add to it."
Hillary Clinton is so unbelievably pampered that she's never been challenged to address her raging hypocrisy as she prances on the Internet about believing every woman's charge of a sexual assault. NBC and Myers never made any mention of Hillary Clinton in their Broaddrick interview, but Broaddrick told Sean Hannity and others that Clinton came up to her and shook her hand firmly after the assault, saying something like "I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him."
No one in the liberal media touched the issue of Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy on rape. A month ago on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, a voter asked bluntly about the contrast between her husband's accusers and her tweet. That's more than any so-called "reporter" has mustered. She smiled brightly and said "Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence."
So Clintonian. "Believed at first..." and then destroyed.
But the Clintons never have been asked to produce a shred of exculpatory evidence. The media merely moved on. The hell with them.
This week, Joy Behar on "The View" reflected the media mindset, discussing Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy. Apparently, rape and drowning are secondary concerns to advancing the feminist agenda: "I don't like either one of them, to tell you the truth, Teddy or Bill. They're both dogs as far as I'm concerned. But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor."
The credibility of feminism was shredded by the Clintons in 1990s. Nothing's changed in 2016.
The Queen made a fateful decision in the spring of 1992, when Gennifer Flowers revealed her affair with Clinton. He was the only hope the Democrats had that year, and it was determined that he must be protected. The post-Super Bowl 60 Minutes interview, the pretty in pink press conference, the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy – all the stops were pulled. The Queen and the Hive went all in on Clinton, and they've been stuck with him ever since.
Until now. It's as though they're getting tired. The damned Clintons still keep up their outrageous behavior, and keep expecting the Queen to cover for them. It takes a lot of time and energy to destroy the Clintons' critics, and it's getting old. And then there's all the tawdriness associated with the criminal enterprise known as the Clinton Foundation, and being dead broke, and the $200,000 speaking fees from any schmuck who'll pay, and the Benghazi lies, and the email fiasco, and the overweening sense of entitlement, and on and on. It's just too much.
You get the sense that even the Queen is getting sick of it all.
And then there are people like Joseph DiGenova and R. Emmett Tyrell, Jr. – people you can't just ignore – saying that the FBI is going to recommend indicting her. This has got to temper your enthusiasm in coming to her defense.
I've talked about black swans, like Timothy McVeigh, and how they can change the political dynamic. A Hillary indictment would be a golden swan, virtually guaranteeing a landslide win for any Republican, Trump included.
While I respect DiGenova and Tyrrell, I'm not a buyer. Obama won't let it happen. He'd rather take the heat from FBI director Comey's resignation. Nixon fired Archibald Cox, and Obama can fire anybody who wants to indict Hillary. I suppose there's a scenario where Obama would hang Hillary out to dry, but thinking that through would require delving into the deep reaches of Obama's psyche, something I'm unwilling to do.
Bill Clinton is a despicable man, like all sexual predators. He's also a coward, as the record of his predation shows. Approaching women in the manner he did to, say, Paula Jones is dangerous. Women like Paula may have boyfriends or fathers or brothers who would be willing to physically assault anyone who behaved as Clinton did. I know guys like that. Bones get broken. But Clinton waited until he was the governor of Arkansas to unleash his inner predator and was thus assured of state trooper protection from any retaliation. As I've said before. He's a punk.
A punk embraced, quite recently, with open arms by all the Bushes, 1, 2, and 3. He's such a great guy, they love hanging out with him.
And these are the people who are supposed to have class?
I’ll stick with my friends in flyover country.
*
The New York Times
Fritz Pettyjohn was the chairman of Reagan for President, Alaska, in 1979-1980; is a co-founder of the Balanced Budget Amendment Task Force; and blogs daily at ReaganProject.com
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/01/is_the_hive_breaking_up_with_bill_and_hillary_.html#ixzz3wm4JNw74
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
The Cosby-Clinton Media Double Standard
(AP Photo)
On Comedy Central, leftist "fake news" anchor Larry Wilmore said even if Cosby isn't convicted, a trial is a good thing. "For too long, the women who have accused him of this crime were not being listened to, because they were being silenced by a powerful man and a complicit culture. And, now, finally, regardless of what happens next, they're being heard."
A powerful man, a complicit culture: sounds like Bill Clinton — except the real "news" media will never turn on him.
None of Bill Cosby's accusers were ever slimed by pundits. They've been treated with respect and with care because the alleged crime called for it.
But look how they treated Paula Jones. The body language from the start implied she was trailer trash and deserved it. Kathleen Willey? She was allegedly groped by Clinton, so she was more trash begging to presidentially pawed. Juanita Broaddrick? She accused the president of rape, and the media walked away, never wanting a real answer.
On Nov. 22, Hillary Clinton had the denialist chutzpah to tweet this about campus rape policies: "Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported." This from the same woman who oversaw "bimbo" patrols to destroy the reputation of any woman who alleged any sexual misconduct by her lecherous husband.
On Jan. 6, Juanita Broaddrick responded on Twitter: "I was 35 when Ark. Attorney General Bill Clinton raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73 .... it never goes away."
Broaddrick told her story about the alleged 1978 assault on the Feb. 24, 1999 edition of "Dateline NBC." In a C-SPAN interview last August, her NBC interviewer Lisa Myers said, "Nothing has come up since that story was reported that in any way undercuts what Juanita Broaddrick said."
Her horrific story brought forth the imagery of Bill Clinton biting down on this woman's lip as he violently attacked her — Broaddrick in shock, her lip bloody and swollen, her underwear torn — and then Clinton putting on his shades and saying, "You better put some ice on that" as he left the room.
And in reply, the president never had to say more to the press than legalese: "My counsel has made a statement about the first issue and I have nothing to add to it."
Hillary Clinton is so unbelievably pampered that she's never been challenged to address her raging hypocrisy as she prances on the Internet about believing every woman's charge of a sexual assault. NBC and Myers never made any mention of Hillary Clinton in their Broaddrick interview, but Broaddrick told Sean Hannity and others that Clinton came up to her and shook her hand firmly after the assault, saying something like "I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him."
No one in the liberal media touched the issue of Hillary Clinton's hypocrisy on rape. A month ago on the campaign trail in New Hampshire, a voter asked bluntly about the contrast between her husband's accusers and her tweet. That's more than any so-called "reporter" has mustered. She smiled brightly and said "Well, I would say that everybody should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence."
So Clintonian. "Believed at first..." and then destroyed.
But the Clintons never have been asked to produce a shred of exculpatory evidence. The media merely moved on. The hell with them.
This week, Joy Behar on "The View" reflected the media mindset, discussing Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy. Apparently, rape and drowning are secondary concerns to advancing the feminist agenda: "I don't like either one of them, to tell you the truth, Teddy or Bill. They're both dogs as far as I'm concerned. But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor."
The credibility of feminism was shredded by the Clintons in 1990s. Nothing's changed in 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment