THE CLINTON GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP TO
LOOT THE POOR
THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION… FUNDED BY OBAMA’S CRONY
BANKSTERS,
MUSLIM DICTATORS, CRIMINAL BILLIONAIRES….
HILLARY CLINTON GLOBAL PREDATOR
A Hillary victory means there won’t be a departure; merely a
doubling-down by the elite, as they act with renewed zest to secure their
interests -- versus the national welfare. The Great Imposition -- a war waged
on average Americans -- will continue with awful consequences. J. ROBERT
SMITH - THE AMERICAN THINKER.COM
“Forget the arrogance and
corruption -- $153 million in Clinton family speaking fees from 2001, mainly
bribes during her State Department years. Forget the lies, the lies about lies,
and the perjury. Forget the security breaches. Forget enabling America’s most
prominent sexual predator. Forget the trail of bodies stretching from Little
Rock to Benghazi. Forget every scandal from Whitewater to deleted e-mails.
Forget all of it.”
THE CLINTON DOCTRINE:
OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED AND SERVICE TO
THE 1% TO KEEP THE BUCKS ROLLING INTO THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION!
HILLARY CLINTON’S VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL
BRIBES
FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone virtually unreported by corporate
media, Breitbart News has
extensively documented the Clintons’
longstanding support for “open
borders.” Interestingly, as
the Los Angeles Times observed
in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open borders frequently
comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy foreign audiences and donors.
SUCKING IN THE BRIBES
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE TAWDRY LIVES OF HILLARY &
BILLARY
The
Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came to power in
Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is long and
tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been to enrich
themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about lying,
cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the Perons
of America. They eventually set up a "foundation" and the
money kept rolling in.
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
AMERICA’S
ECONOMIC ARMAGEDDON
Under
Obama-Clintonomics, the rich became VERY rich and we got the tax bills for
their bailouts and crimes!
The travesty of Obama's award for 'ethics in government'
The University of Illinois inexplicably gave the extremely corrupt, unethical, and immoral Obama the Paul H. Douglas Award for Ethics in Government. I assume that their next award will go to Bill, Hillary, and Harvey Weinstein for their respectful treatment of women.
My guess is that the students and employees at the U of I who listened to Obama's self-righteous speech believe that Obama is ethical because most of the media intentionally hid the mass corruption, or if they reported on it, they downplayed it. The corruption and unethical behavior started as soon as Obama took office.
Screen grab: CBS.
Obama immediately violated bankruptcy law when he gave preferential treatment to unsecured unions over more secure bond-holders and other unsecure creditors. It is certainly immoral, unethical, and corrupt for a president to ignore settled law to buy votes.
Reporting from Washington – House Republicans lashed out at what they called preferential treatment the Obama administration gave to certain union pensions in the bailout of General Motors Corp. during the 2008 financial crisis.During a subcommittee hearing Wednesday, Republicans accused the administration of favoring union employees of Delphi Corp., the largest U.S. supplier of auto parts, and leaving many nonunion, salaried employees empty-handed.The government took over Delphi's pension plan during the company's reorganization in Bankruptcy Court. Roughly 21,000 salaried employees lost up to 70% of their pensions, as well as life and health insurance.
Then, as Obama preached against big money in politics, he took taxpayer funds to reward his big political donors with jobs, contracts, and loans.
More than two years after President Obama took office vowing to banish "special interests" from his administration, nearly 200 of his biggest donors have landed plum government jobs and advisory posts, won federal contracts worth millions of dollars for their business interests or attended numerous elite White House meetings and social events, an investigation by iWatch News has found.These "bundlers" raised at least $50,000 and sometimes more than $500,000 in campaign donations for Obama's campaign.
The Justice Department was investigating Uranium One and had found substantial evidence that Russian nuclear officials had engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion, and money-laundering, yet the Obama administration approved selling the uranium to the Russians anyway.
We are told by the complicit media that over $100 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation had nothing to do with the deal going through, and now we are getting speeches from the flexible Obama about Trump cozying up to Russia.
[T]he Clinton Foundation, had accepted $145 million in donations from Uranium One investors in exchange for the deal getting green lit[.]
Obama didn't care about the Clintons' funneling money meant for the poor in Haiti to a Clinton donor. Obama watched as the Clintons got massive amounts of money from foreigners and others for "access."
The Clintons also funneled $10 million in federal loans to a firm called InnoVida, headed by Clinton donor Claudio Osorio. Osorio had loaded its board with Clinton cronies, including longtime Clinton ally General Wesley Clark[.]Normally the loan approval process takes months or even years. But in this case, a government official wrote, "Former President Bill Clinton is personally in contact with the company to organize its logistical and support needs."
When Obamacare was short of funds, Obama just robbed other funds. Obama seemed to believe that all the money was his to do as he pleased.
The executive branch tried everything from deceptive accounting to shell games to move money from one pot of government funds to the Obamacare till. Ultimately, a federal judge stepped in and ruled that the Department of Health and Human Services could not redirect other federal funds to pay for the subsidies.Within weeks, however, the subsidies were miraculously funded, against the will of Congress.Recently revealed documents appear to confirm that the sudden influx of Obamacare funds was money the Obama administration diverted from Fannie and Freddie.
How immoral and corrupt is it when a president searching for a legacy (who says he didn't have anything to do with the Justice Department) stops an investigation into a drug-running terrorist organization? He and his administration obviously don't care about all the people killed by terrorists and opiates. He also shipped bribes in the form of unmarked bills to the corrupt Iran leaders.
A covert DEA investigation into a Hezbollah drug smuggling operation was halted, allegedly, to aid the Obama administration's nuclear deal with Iran.
The Obama administration had slush funds at the Justice Department, EPA, and CFPB, where they shook down businesses to give money to liberal donors. So liberal groups donated to Democrats, and Democrats shook down businesses and funneled kickbacks to the liberal groups, some of which came back to Democrats. I wonder if journalists can spot the pure corruption, unethical behavior, and immorality in those slush funds.
President Barack Obama's Justice Department created a "slush fund" of nearly $1 billion using legal settlements with banks and steered those funds to political allies on the left while excluding conservative groups, internal documents show.
One of the most corrupt things I have seen in my life is when the DNC and Hillary paid over $10 million for a fictitious document; hid the information from the FEC; and then, in collusion with the Obama administration, Justice Department, complicit media, State Department, and intelligence agencies, continue to use it to take down a duly elected president.
Obama was corrupt long before the media supported him to be president, but since his name wasn't Palin and he was a Democrat, the media didn't care.
After Barack Obama became an Illinois state legislator, his wife moved up as well, scoring a job as 'vice president of community relations' at the University Of Chicago Hospital for a very generous salary of $121,910. When Obama became a senator in 2005, her 'salary' leapfrogged to $316,962 for the same job...and one of Senator Obama's first acts in office was to see to it that the hospital received over a million dollars of your tax dollars as an earmark.Well, Michelle has moved on, and guess what...that vital job of hers, worth a salary of over $300 K has been quietly eliminated.
The Obamas pretend to care about the poor as they willingly treat the poor as pawns.
The First Lady helped create a notorious program that dumped poor patients on community hospitals, yet the national media ignore the story. Imagine if her husband were a Republican.
I have trouble thinking of anything as corrupt, unethical, and immoral as a politician and wife who want an expensive house but can't afford it and then take taxpayer money to get a kickback in the form of a higher salary and then still can't afford the property so hit up a corrupt donor for some of the money.
In sharp contrast to his tough talk about ethics reform in government, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., approached a well-known Illinois political fixer under active federal investigation, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, for "advice" as he sought to find a way to buy a house shortly after being elected to the United States Senate.The parcel included an adjacent lot which Obama told the Chicago Tribune he could not afford because "it was already a stretch to buy the house."On the same day Obama closed on his house, Rezko's wife bought the adjacent empty lot, meeting the condition of the seller who wanted to sell both properties at the same time.
The corruption was so rampant that it is hard to know where to stop, but Democrats, journalists, Hollywood, and the Justice Department didn't care.
The true threat to our constitutional Republic is when the Justice Department and journalists pick which party to protect and which party to destroy with made up dossiers and anonymous sources.
It is truly pathetic to listen to Obama lecture about anything, let alone integrity, and watch him and others pretend his administration was scandal-free when it is clear that the Justice Department was in the tank.
If journalists are so willing to ignore massive corruption in their reporting in order to elect people, couldn't they fairly be called enemies of the people or enemies of the truth? Maybe they should just be called tools of the Democratic Party.
Haiti’s hurricane devastation: A tragedy rooted in capitalist oppression
Haiti’s hurricane devastation: A tragedy rooted in capitalist oppression
13 October 2016
One week after Hurricane Matthew struck the southern coast of Haiti, the full dimensions of the devastation inflicted on the people of this impoverished Caribbean nation are only beginning to emerge.
The unofficial death toll has risen well past 1,000. Tens of thousands are injured and unable to receive medical aid, with hospitals and clinics badly damaged and lacking basic supplies such as painkillers and antibiotics, not to mention power and clean water. The United Nations estimates that 2.1 million Haitians--more than 20 percent of the country’s population--have been affected by the storm, with 1.4 million in urgent need of humanitarian assistance.
What is still to come will almost certainly be worse. The crops of Haiti’s southern coast have been wiped out and there are warnings of famine. Cholera cases are again on the rise. The disease has already claimed the lives of over 10,000 Haitians after being introduced into the country by United Nations “peace-keeping” troops.
The immense suffering from Hurricane Matthew comes less than seven years after the 2010 earthquake, which killed 230,000 people, injured 300,000 more, and left over 1.5 million people homeless. As we wrote at the time, the people of Haiti were “…victims not merely of a natural catastrophe. The lack of infrastructure, the poor quality of construction in Port-au-Prince and the impotence of the Haitian government to organize any response are determining factors in this tragedy.
“These social conditions are the product of a protracted relationship between Haiti and the United States, which, ever since US Marines occupied the island nation for nearly 20 years beginning in 1915, has treated the country as a de facto colonial protectorate.”
This bitter legacy of imperialist oppression remains the essential factor in the horrific impact of natural disasters like Hurricane Matthew.
In the wake of the 2010 earthquake, international donors pledged $10.4 billion for Haiti, including $3.9 billion from the US. The chief figure overseeing this relief effort was Bill Clinton, whose previous “gift” to the people of Haiti was a trade deal that eliminated tariffs on rice imports from the US subsidized by the American government, bankrupting Haiti’s own rice producers and leaving the country unable to feed itself.
Welcoming the earthquake’s death and destruction as a golden opportunity for further capitalist profit-making, the former Democratic president vowed that the aid money would allow Haiti to “build back better.” Nearly seven years later, the universal question asked by Haitians is “what happened to the money?”
Today, just as in 2010, Haiti remains the
poorest and most socially unequal country in
the Western Hemisphere. While the masses
of Haiti remain mired in poverty, the former
US president and his wife Hillary, the 2016
Democratic presidential candidate, have seen
their own wealth soar, raking in an estimated
$230 million in income since Bill Clinton left
the White House.
poorest and most socially unequal country in
the Western Hemisphere. While the masses
of Haiti remain mired in poverty, the former
US president and his wife Hillary, the 2016
Democratic presidential candidate, have seen
their own wealth soar, raking in an estimated
$230 million in income since Bill Clinton left
the White House.
The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of
American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent
bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to
ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political
ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to
Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic
Clinton Foundation.
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of
American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent
bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to
ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political
ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to
Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic
Clinton Foundation.
It was the foundation that played a prominent role in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. Its most visible legacy is a low-wage garment factory run by a South Korean company known for its use of violence and intimidation to subdue its workers, alongside a pair of luxury hotels catering to businessmen seeking opportunities to extract profit from the oppression of the super-exploited Haitian working class.
In an investigation of the foundation’s activities in Haiti, ABC News wrote that the garment factory “has under-delivered on projected jobs.” It continued: “Haitian workers have accused managers of bullying and sexual harassment. And…after opening its factory in the Haitian industrial park--built with $400 million in global aid--the Korean firm became a Clinton Foundation donor and its owner invested in a startup company owned by Hillary Clinton’s former chief of staff.”
The report made clear that the relief operation did more for
the “Friends of Bill” than for the Haitian masses, and that
those who coughed up donations to the Clinton Foundation
were rewarded with opportunities to mount profitable
ventures in Haiti.
the “Friends of Bill” than for the Haitian masses, and that
those who coughed up donations to the Clinton Foundation
were rewarded with opportunities to mount profitable
ventures in Haiti.
In addition to Hillary Clinton’s former chief of staff at the State Department, the Democratic candidate’s younger brother, Tony Rodham, also cashed in on the Clinton connection in Haiti, including through his position on the advisory board of a US company that in 2012 secured the first gold mining permit issued in the country in half a century. The Haitian Senate subsequently put a hold on the controversial permit.
The Clinton Foundation is emblematic of the role played by imperialist “humanitarianism.” In Haiti, it serves as an instrument for shoring up Washington’s semi-colonial domination under conditions in which US imperialist hegemony is being challenged by the growth of Chinese trade and investment elsewhere in the hemisphere. In Syria, it provides the pretext for a proxy war that has killed hundreds of thousands of people.
The real relationship of the Clintons to Haiti was further exposed by the decision of the Department of Homeland Security Secretary to resume the deportation of Haitian refugees. While temporarily suspended because of the hurricane, the deportations are to begin as soon as possible. In the meantime, the refugees are being imprisoned in detention camps.
While the Obama administration claimed the action was
warranted because of improved conditions in Haiti, it was
driven by proof of the exact opposite, in the form of
thousands of Haitian refugees arriving at the US-Mexican
border. The decision was taken in large part out of fear that
allowing them into the country could undermine Hillary
Clinton’s presidential bid.
warranted because of improved conditions in Haiti, it was
driven by proof of the exact opposite, in the form of
thousands of Haitian refugees arriving at the US-Mexican
border. The decision was taken in large part out of fear that
allowing them into the country could undermine Hillary
Clinton’s presidential bid.
Anger over the conditions in Haiti is growing. UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon warned Monday, “Tensions are already mounting as people await help.” Among the first moves of the UN has been to extend for six months the mandate of the UN Stabilization Mission (MINUSTAH), which deploys armed “peace-keepers” in Haiti. US Marines have also been deployed to the country and are reportedly operating with the Haitian National Police against “looters.”
Overcoming the legacy of imperialist oppression in Haiti is possible only through the revolutionary struggle of the Haitian workers and oppressed, in unity with the workers in the United States and internationally, to put an end to the capitalist system.
Bill Van Auken
No comments:
Post a Comment