Monday, June 26, 2017

CYNTHIA FARAHAT - THE SAUDI THREAT TO AMERICA

After more than a year of a heated debate, Egypt finally ceded two small Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia, giving KSA control over the Straits of Tiran and the Gulf of Aqaba. These waterways separate the Sinai Peninsula from the Arabian main...

June 26, 2017

Gulf of Aqaba Treaty: a Saudi Repudiation of the Camp David Accords



After more than a year of a heated debate, Egypt finally ceded two small Red Sea Islands to Saudi Arabia, giving KSA control over the Straits of Tiran and the Gulf of Aqaba. These waterways separate the Sinai Peninsula from the Arabian mainland and portions of the coastline are owned by Egypt, Israel, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia. Giving ownership of Tiran and Sanafir Islands and control of the gulf and straits to Saudi Arabia is a strategic mistake and a security threat for five reasons.
1) Almost every regime in Saudi Arabia has furthered expansionist, imperialistic agendas. Historically, Saudi rulers have attempted to lead the Muslim Umma (nation) by conquest or political and religious imperialism. King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud’s seizure of power in 2015 wasn’t smooth, there were and still are attempts to overthrow him. The Saudi internal conflict will most likely escalate after King Salman’s historic precedent to move the Saudi succession from the house of Abdulaziz ibn al-Saud to the house of Salman. King Salman may believe that asserting his territorial control of Gulf of Aqaba will help him strengthen his domestic position by increasing his regional and international power. Whether the Tiran treaty, and succession coup stunt works or backfires is yet to be seen.
2) King Salman has allegedly agreed to a portion of the Camp David Accords, which guarantees Israel unfettered access through the Straits of Tiran. This acquiescence creates a serious catch-22 for the King. While the deal increases King Salman’s regional power, an agreement with the Jewish state threatens his domestic authority, because he is bound by Islamic Sunni jurisprudence. For example, the Saudi view of treaties with Israel was expressed by King Salman supporter and Saudi celebrity Sheikh, Salman al-Ouda. When Mr. al-Ouda was asked about the legitimacy of treaties with Israel, he answered with a Fatwa issued in 1988-1989 and signed by 60 Sunni scholars. It declared jihad against Israel adding, “under no circumstances is a person or an entity to recognize Jewish authority over any fraction of the land of Palestine.”
If King Salman were to actually abide by any element of the Camp David Accords, his rule would become illegitimate according to Saudi Arabia’s fundamentalist Islamic system. These are the views Saudi rulers indoctrinate their citizens to adopt as the sole legitimate Islamic position towards Israel.
3) According to the Sunni Saudi narrative, suicide bombings against Jews and non-Muslims is a legitimate form of dissent. For example, a member of Saudi Arabia’s Supreme Council of Scholars and Advisor at the Saudi Royal Court, Abdallah Ibn Man'a previously stated in an official Fatwa, “The best form of jihad for Allah, is martyrdom in his cause. Whoever dies in such an operation, is a martyr.”
Moreover, Saudi Arabia indoctrinates its security officers into adopting the belief in suicide bombings. For example, former security police officer and current Muslim sheikh Sami bin Khalid Awad el-Hamoud, received his Master’s degree in Islamic jurisprudence from King Saudi University in Riyadh. His thesis was titled, “Suicide Operations: Its forms and its jurisprudence,” where he argued that any region governed by non-Muslim laws is a “house of war,” where jihad in all its forms, should be exercised.
Since Salman has never shown any intention of abandoning Islamic jurisprudence, which is Saudi Arabia’s raison d'être, his only solution under Sunni theology would be to officially agree to the accords, but unofficially continue to support militant Islamic activities.
It’s puzzling why Egypt and Israel would agree to further associate with King Salman, who was accused by the New York Times for direct involvement in financing terrorism in Pakistan and Bosnia. While Israel is officially granted freedom of passage in Gulf of Aqaba by the Camp David Accords, there is absolutely no evidence that Salman will abide by the accords or that he would not abuse his power in the Gulf of Aqaba. This would deeply endanger both Egypt and Israel.
4) The possibility that King Salma will facilitate a jihadist migration into Sinai, given his history as a terror financier, is not far-fetched. The presence of more jihadists in Sinai, would endanger both Egypt and Eilat. Sadly, this scenario is likely given the fact that KSA plans to build a bridge linking Sinai to Arabia. Many have taken KSA’s newfound control of the Gulf of Aqaba at face value and celebrated it as a Saudi adoption of part of the Camp David Accords. The treaty should be more accurately viewed as a Saudi repudiation of the accords, given the negative possible outcomes for both Egypt and Israel’s security.
A warning about Saudi control of Tiran and Sanafir, was communicated in a 1957 CIA intelligence brief titled, “Prospects of an Armed Clash in the Gulf of Aqaba.” The brief warned -- “Saudi Arabia, which controls the east coast of the Straits of Tiran, could conceivably take unilateral action to prevent entry of Israeli or Israeli-bound vessels into the Gulf.” The briefing continued, “In the event that Saudi forces were to occupy the islands they might attempt to control shipping through the straits of Tiran from positions on the islands.” It’s still 1957 in Saudi Arabia, and if Salman and his son are overthrown, the possibility of replacing them with an Iranian friendly option, such as Prince Ahmed bin Abdel Aziz al-Saud, would mean that a Saudi-Iran coalition could be created.
5) Signs of other security concerns caused by the treaty have already begun to manifest. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Turkey-based Egyptian Revolutionary Council (ERC), has basically declared jihad in Gulf of Aqaba in an official statement on its official Facebook page. The ERC called upon Egyptians living in the cities overlooking the Red Sea, to “struggle to liberate” the Islands and the Gulf of Aqaba and treat them as, “occupied territories.”
In another veiled call for terrorism, the statement also urged citizens to “treat all Saudi companies and institutions, as occupying forces.” Not only does this destabilize Egypt’s security, more dangerously, it can inspire a coup d'état in Egypt. A coup could be launched with the excuse of defending Egyptian land, which may work given President el-Sisi’s plummeting popularity after the treaty signing.
The issue of the Red Sea islands is part of a broader and reoccurring question of whether or not the free world should be making deals and treaties with Islamic theocracies. The international community would be well advised to refrain from further official treaties with Sunni and other theocratic nations, until these regimes reform their governments and recognize the modern international laws and treaties, to which they have already committed. Until that time, it is irresponsible to make treaties, which have repeatedly backfired. The Saudi control of the Gulf of Aqaba, is almost as dangerous to regional peace as President Barack Obama’s Iranian nuclear deal.
Cynthia Farahat is an Author and Fellow at the Middle East Forum

THE SAUDI HATRED OF AMERICA

…. Their expanding Muslim invasion in the United States



Megan Leavey: Oblivious to Iraqi suffering

By Joanne Laurier 
23 June 2017
 
Directed by Gabriela Cowperthwaite; screenplay by Pamela Gray, Annie Mumolo and Tim Lovestedt
The US is now permanently at war in large parts of the globe, with plans for further bombings, invasions and occupations. American military personnel are active in some 160 foreign countries and territories, with the Pentagon officially acknowledging the existence of 800 bases in 80 countries or so—more than any other nation or empire in history.
Film, television and the American media as a whole function largely to launder the ruthless daily violence and aggression, to render it fit as much as possible for public consumption. On the one hand, they resort to bombast and mythmaking; on the other, they offer the “human interest” story. Gabriela Cowperthwaite’s film, Megan Leavey, is one of the latter prettification efforts.
Based on a true story (or elements of one), the movie opens in 2001, in the hamlet of Valley Cottage, New York, some 30 miles north of New York City.
Megan Leavey (Kate Mara) is a young woman in a downward spiral (“After my best friend died, I checked out of life completely.”). Her mother (Edie Falco), divorced from her father (Bradley Whitford) and now living with another man (Will Patton), is sick of her daughter’s floundering (“She’s not gonna sit in my goddamned house and do nothing”). Megan, as she says, has “left this place a thousand times in my mind, but I never actually went anywhere.”
Her deliverance from a dead-end life takes the form of enlistment in the Marines. After boot camp, Megan is assigned to the K9 unit, the military police dog squad, at Camp Pendleton in southern California. Unable to seriously connect with people, she forms a bond with a particularly ferocious German Shepherd named Rex. Corporal Megan and Rex are deployed to Ramadi, Iraq to locate IEDs (improvised explosive devices) and fight the insurgency, i.e., the local population hostile to the American occupiers.
During this time she has a brief relationship with a human and fellow Marine, Matt (Ramón Rodríguez), who, in the end, can’t compete with the true “love of her life,” Rex. Seriously. There’s also the fact that she’s a New York Yankees fan and he’s a fan of the New York Mets—rival baseball teams.
After she and Rex are injured during a mission, Megan leaves the military, having been awarded a Purple Heart. The remainder of the film depicts Megan’s unrelenting efforts to adopt her canine companion, which eventually takes place through the intercession of Sen. Charles Schumer (Democrat from New York) in 2012.
The filmmakers (and a large portion of the critics) would like to pretend that Megan Leavey is merely the story of the unusual devotion between girl and dog. While this may be its major concern, along the way the movie proves a repugnant pro-war piece and glorification of the US military. As far as one can tell, virtually every American serviceman or woman, including Megan, wants nothing less than to wipe out the Iraqi population, who are viewed as savages.
The WSWS wrote in regard to Clint Eastwood’s noxious American Sniper (2014): “The American soldiers are obliged, according to the logic of the film, to exterminate great numbers of Iraqis both in self-defense and as some sort of act of public hygiene.” So it is with Megan Leavey.
Assisting in this, through no fault of their own, are the four-legged members of the K9 unit, who—we are told—are “not pets. They’re not even dogs anymore. They’re warriors.” In fact, “Corporal Rex” is given an elaborate retirement ceremony at Yankee Stadium!
In rendering the life story of Megan Leavey (born 1983), director Cowperthwaite gives the same weight to the vicissitudes of the relationship between Megan and Rex as she does to the invasion and occupation of Iraq, a world-historic event. The relationship between young woman and dog blossoms as they participate in the neocolonial subjugation, or attempted subjugation, of the haji, that is, the Iraqi population. (Haji is a racist term employed by members of the US military throughout the film. It is equivalent to the Vietnamese being called “gooks.”)
In a scene at a Ramadi checkpoint, for example, American military personnel treat every Iraqi, even the children, as though they are facing off with the devil. In another deplorable sequence, the home of an Iraq man is raided, revealing a cache of concealed weapons. How dare this “ haji” think of challenging the civilizers of an untamed land!
One of the movie’s covert premises is that for American youth the answer to a bleak existence is to join the military and kill defenseless people on the other side of the world. This is a harsh commentary on US society whose implications the filmmakers prefer to ignore. Large sections of a generation of young people face unemployment or miserable wages, poverty, crushing student debt, opioid addiction or police brutality. A certain proportion will inevitably join the military. The overwhelming majority will draw very different conclusions.
In Megan Leavey, Cowperthwaite skirts important issues: the real Leavey was also deployed with Rex to Fallujah in 2005. The filmmakers perhaps avoid that episode because Fallujah, reduced to ruins by the American military with thousands of its citizens killed, is the city most symbolic of the murderous consequences of the 2003 invasion. As the WSWS wrote in 2004: “The aim of the US assault is to make Fallujah an example to the rest of Iraq of what will happen to those who oppose the transformation of their country into a US client state. It is the spearhead of an orgy of killing intended to crush and drive underground every voice of opposition.”
Nor does the film care to mention how the K9 unit has been used in places like the infamous Iraqi prison, Abu Ghraib, and the US detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to intimidate and torture prisoners in violation of international law.


Cowperthwaite’s previous film, Blackfish (2013), was concerned with the exploitation and mistreatment of whales. In Megan Leavey, she obsesses about the fate of a German Shepherd, which in her mind outweighs the US destruction of Iraqi society and the more than one million deaths. What can one say about such people?

THE SAUDI HATRED OF AMERICA

…. Their expanding Muslim invasion in the United States

THEY INVADED US 9-11 AND MURDERED THOUSANDS OF OUR PEOPLE. THEY’RE STILL TRYING TO MURDER US AND WE’RE HANDING THEM THE ARMS TO DO IT!



Who does not remember the Obomb bending over to kiss the hem of the 9-11 invading Saudi dictator, King Lardbucket the Fornicator?


THE SAUDIS ROYAL LARDBUCKETS and their boy Obomb:


Let us see if the SAUDIS invaders will finance Obomb’s
PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY like they did Bush and Billary’s!

 


Selling Out America and Sucking In the Bribes!

THE OBAMA AND SAUDIS PARTNERSHIP:

WILL THEY FINANCE HIS LIBRARY AND MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP IN THE MAKING?


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/02/barack-obama-his-saudis-wahhabi.html

Palace coup in Saudi Arabia

By Jean Shaoul 
23 June 2017
Saudi Arabia’s 82-year-old King Salman has issued a series of decrees proclaiming his favourite son, the 31-year-old Mohammed bin Salman, as his immediate successor. He supplants Salman’s nephew, the head of internal security and deputy prime minister, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Nayef.
Salman also consolidated Mohammed’s power base, appointing the 34-year-old Abdulaziz bin Saud bin Nayef, who is very close to the new crown prince, to head the million-strong interior ministry, responsible for the suppression and intimidation of the Saudi people in the name of “fighting terrorism.”
The new crown prince, previously second in line to the throne, already holds the defence and economy portfolios, and chairs the highest board of Aramco, the world’s largest oil company. The appointment makes him king in all but name, presiding over a royal household of more than 7,000 princes riven with factional infighting.
He sought support for his accession to the throne by reversing cuts to civil service salaries implemented last September and granting an additional week’s holiday, announced to mark the end of Ramadan. According to the Economist, this will add a further US$13 billion to the budget deficit, projected at US$86 billion or 12 percent of GDP this year.
He also orchestrated a series of moves to isolate bin Nayef and strengthen his own position, including appointing his younger brother, Prince Khalid, as ambassador to Washington to strengthen his relations with the Trump administration.
Relations with former President Barack Obama’s White House became increasingly fraught after Washington failed to follow up on its threat to attack Syria in 2013 and reached a nuclear accord with Shi’ite-ruled Iran that Riyadh vehemently opposed.
Mohammed bin Salman also appointed a cousin and ally as deputy governor of the oil-rich Eastern Province, whose governor is Mohammed bin Nayef’s brother, Saud bin Nayef.
Salman’s dethroning of a second crown prince (he pensioned off Prince Muqrin in April 2015) since his accession to the throne in January 2015 reflects the increasingly turbulent situation in which the House of Saud, the world’s largest oil producer and crucial US ally, finds itself.
The palace coup is a desperate attempt to resolve the military, political and economic conflicts that stem from the decades of US-led wars in the region at the expense of the Saudi masses. It portends ever-more autocratic rule, economic hardship and an escalation of regional wars of which the ongoing hostile moves by Saudi Arabia against Qatar and Iran are the most dramatic indication.
The economic crisis gripping the country has been acerbated by the murderous, but largely unsuccessful war instigated by Mohammed bin Salman against the rebel Houthis and their ally, former President Ali Abdullah Saleh in Yemen, who still control the capital and most of the northern part of the country. The war has led to 4,773 confirmed civilian deaths and 8,272 injured, mass starvation and cholera, with a child dying every 10 minutes and 7 million people at acute risk of starvation in what the United Nations has called the worst humanitarian disaster since 1945.
The war has served to destabilise Riyadh’s relations with its traditional allies. Pakistan has refused repeated requests to send troops to fight the Houthis, while Oman has stayed out of it and Egypt has provided only token assistance.
Riyadh has also poured tens of billions of dollars into arming reactionary Islamist militias, designated as “rebels” in the US-backed war to overthrow the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad and isolate Iran, Syria’s main backer in the Middle East. The six-year-long war has killed nearly half a million people. Four million people have fled the country while upwards of 6.3 million are internally displaced.
The Saudis have whipped up sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shia throughout the region and opposed Iran’s support for Riyadh’s political rivals in Lebanon, Bahrain and Iraq.
Mohammed bin Salman, as minister of defence, has adopted a particularly bellicose attitude towards Iran, framing tensions with Tehran in sectarian terms, stating that Iran’s goal is “to control the Islamic world” and to spread its Shiite doctrine, and vowing to take “the battle” to Iran.
Emboldened by President Donald Trump’s first overseas visit to Riyadh last month, he precipitated a crisis in the Gulf Cooperation Council by trying to isolate Qatar, accusing it of supporting ISIS, the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran.
His purpose was to dragoon Qatar behind the Saudis’ stand against Iran and its other predatory policies, including unstinting support for Egypt’s military regime. He organised an economic blockade, tantamount to a declaration of war, upsetting the defence establishment in Washington, which has a crucial American military base in Qatar, and further destabilising the region. Turkey has come to Qatar’s aid as has Iran, while Pakistan, Oman and Kuwait remain neutral.
Iran has accused the US and Saudi Arabia of being behind the ISIS terror attacks in Tehran two weeks ago that killed at least 12 people and injured dozens more when gunmen and suicide bombers attacked the parliament and the mausoleum of Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic.
Social tensions are explosive. The fall in oil prices, upon which Saudi Arabia depends for 70 percent of its revenue, has led to a drastic cutback in public expenditure, the imposition of a value-added tax and the proposed sale of 5 percent of Aramco to fund an economic diversification programme.
In the face of massive budget deficits, plummeting foreign reserves and growth of less than 1 percent, the lowest for almost four years, Mohammed overturned the Kingdom’s decades-long policy of buying political quiescence with a social contract that has provided some security—via low utility prices, social subventions and public-sector jobs—for the Saudi population, and promoted a wave of Sunni-based Saudi nationalism.
It was he who, last September, slashed housing, vacation and sickness allowances and reduced some civil service salaries by a third.
Utility bills rose as subsidies fell, fuelling poverty levels while he splashed out US$500 billion on a yacht.
This month, the government tightened restrictions on foreign workers, who constitute about 12 million of the country’s 33 million population, in a bid to reduce unemployment among Saudi nationals, reserving retail jobs for Saudis. One million are expected to leave in the next few weeks.
The official unemployment rate of 12.1 percent is widely believed to be an underestimate. Other estimates suggest it is 27-29 percent, rising to 33 percent among young people between 20 and 24 years of age and 38 percent for 24-to-29-year-olds, in a country where two thirds of the population are under 30. Some 1.9 million Saudis out of a total citizenry of 20 million are expected to enter the workforce in the next decade.
While Saudi Arabia’s huge oil wealth is owned by a royal family that lives in the lap of luxury, at least 20 percent of Saudis suffer “crippling” or “severe” poverty, and between 2 and 4 million people live in poverty in Riyadh alone.
Saudi Arabia’s Shia minority in the oil-rich Eastern province suffer from crushing poverty following decades of economic neglect and political marginalisation. Their villages and towns such as Qatif, al-Hasa and particularly al-Awamiya, the hometown of the executed Shia cleric, Sheikh Nimr Baqih al Nimr, lack the infrastructure of their Sunni counterparts.
Migrant workers, mainly from the Indian 

subcontinent and Southeast Asia, who 

number about 12 million, fare even worse, 

with low wages and financial hardship, 

exacerbated by an exploitative sponsorship 

system.


IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY 

AND MASSIVE MUSLIM MINERET TO CALL MUSLIMS TO PRAYER

AND HATRED OF AMERICA.

The Obama Presidential Library Will Be Funded by America's 9-11 Invading Saudis  Who Ban Christians and Jews From Their Dictatorship.

 http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/05/the-obama-presidential-library-will-be.html


The Obama Presidential Monument to a Psychopath Will Provide Call to Prayers in the Muslim Tradition With One Massive Minaret


UNDER THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OBAMA, THE MEX DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE BORDER TO UNDEFENDED BORDER

Mexican cartel smugglers have taken full advantage of the system in order to maximize their profits from human smuggling as well as the smuggling of illegal aliens. In 2014, Mexico’s Gulf Cartel was able to make approximately $38 million in a matter of months off human smuggling alone.

ASK HOW MUCH THE BILLARY PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY HAS SUCKED IN, AND THE BUSH FAMILY’S SAUDIS-CARLYLE GROUP, Inc AND THE BUSH LIBRARY!

HILLARY AND OBOMB’S DIRTY SAUDIS DICTATORS…. How much as she sucked in?



THE CLINTONS SERVE THEIR 9-11 INVADING SAUDIS PAYMASTERS!

DANCING WITH DICTATORS.... BOTH THE CLINTONS ARE EXPERT DANCERS!





MUSLIMS: GLOBAL RAPIST AND 

MURDERERS!
But she was blindfolded, beaten with plastic cables, suspended by her arms for some time and then raped. 

Koran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.”
Koran 3:28 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.”
Koran 3:85 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran.”
Koran 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.”
Koran 9:5 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.”
Koran 9:28 “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.”
Koran 9:30 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."
MUSLIMS: GLOBAL RAPIST AND MURDERRERS!
But she was blindfolded, beaten with plastic cables, suspended by her arms for some time and then raped. 

MUST change the language like the left does. A simple islam is against human rights will do. According to Sharia law:• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see Allah moon god).
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (compulsion in religion).
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see Religion of Peace).
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.
• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see Errors in Quran).
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal”.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
Muslims also believe that homosexuality is punishable by death. Oh and halal death for animals means as long and painful a death as possible for the poor animal. At least with yesterday's march it is now clear beyond any reasonable doubt that the left is against human rights

THE SAUDIS HATRED OF AMERICA

…. Their expanding Muslim invasion in the United States





MUSLIMS: GLOBA RAPIST BECAUSE THEY DE-CLIT THEIR WOMEN!
MUSLIMS AND  MURDER… IT’S GLOBAL,  IT’S DAILY,  IT’S PURE MUSLIM HATRED!

DOZENS MURDERED ATTENDING PALM SUNDAY SERVICES…. You really want more Muslims admitted to this country?

AMERICA CRUMBLES as we hand global Muslim dictatorships  BILLIONS to rebuild their empires of hate and death!




Jesuit Scholar: Islamic Extremists Are the True Muslims



1

Islamic extremists who carry out acts of terror are simply applying what their faith requires of them, according to Jesuit Father Henri Boulad, an Islamic scholar of the Egyptian Greek Melkite rite.

In an interview with the National Catholic Register, Father Boulad said that “Islam is an open-ended declaration of war against non-Muslims” and those who carry out violent jihad are true Muslims who are applying exactly what their creed demands.
Those who fail to recognize the real threat posed by Islam are naïve and ignorant of history, he said, and unfortunately many in the Church fall into this category.
Citing a letter he wrote last August to Pope Francis, Father Boulad said that “on the pretext of openness, tolerance and Christian charity — the Catholic Church has fallen into the trap of the liberal left ideology which is destroying the West.”
“Anything that does not espouse this ideology is immediately stigmatized in the name of ‘political correctness,’” he said.
The priest went so far as to chastise Pope Francis himself—a fellow Jesuit—suggesting that he has fallen into this trap as well.
“Many think that a certain number of your positions are aligned with this ideology and that, from complacency, you go from concessions to concessions and compromises in compromises at the expense of the truth,” the priest wrote to Francis.
Christians in the West and in the East, he wrote the Pope, “are expecting something from you other than vague and harmless declarations that may obscure reality.”
“It is high time to emerge from a shameful and embarrassed silence in the face of this Islamism that attacks the West and the rest of the world. A systematically conciliatory attitude is interpreted by the majority of Muslims as a sign of fear and weakness,” he said.
“If Jesus said to us: Blessed are the peacemakers, he did not say to us: Blessed are the pacifists. Peace is peace at any cost, at any price. Such an attitude is a pure and simple betrayal of truth,” he said.
The priest also stated his belief that the West is in an ethical and moral debacle, and its defense of Islam is a denial of truth.
“By defending at all costs Islam and seeking to exonerate it from the horrors committed every day in its name, one ends up betraying the truth,” he wrote.
To back up his argument, Father Boulad enumerated a number of texts from the Koran that call on Muslims to employ violence in their conquest of the world for Allah.
The many passages he cited included: “Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them” (Koran 2:191), “Make war on the infidels living in your neighbourhood” (Koran 9:123), “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them” (Koran 9:5), “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” (Koran 5:33), “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies” (Koran 22:19), and “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an” Koran 8:12.
Father Boulad is not the first Jesuit scholar to criticize the West for its naivete in dealing with Islam. Last year, Georgetown scholar Father James V. Schall contended that decades of students have been given a “sanitized education” that systematically excludes an honest portrayal of the history and theology of Islam, which limits their ability to assess what is going on in the world.
In his essay titled “Realism and Islam,” Father Schall argued that Islam “is actually and potentially violent throughout its entire history” and the basic reason for this method is religious in nature: “obedience to the Law of Allah.”
Therefore, he wrote, the Western tendency to simply call Muslim violence “terrorism” is insulting to believing Muslims who “see themselves carrying out the will of Allah, even sometimes to their own death in doing so.” Rather than terrorism, he insists, Muslims see their violence as “a religious endeavor to conquer the world,” which they understand to be “an act of piety.”
Because of this gaping educational void, “most citizens are simply not equipped to face the forces now reappearing in the world,” he wrote.
“And while it may be politically incorrect to state these things, they need to be stated and are in fact the truth—things that both Muslims and non-Muslims need to hear and consider,” he said.
Follow Thomas D. Williams on Twitter

ARE THE SAUDIS STILL INVADING US?

Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of hate 

is coming straight from Saudi Arabia.  These mosques are being 

infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism

HOW MUCH $$$$ IN BRIBES HAVE THE SAUDIS LAP 

BITCHES, THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY, HILLARY & BILLARY 

GLOBAL LOOTERS OF THE POOR AND THE "HOPE & 

CHANGE" PSYCHOPATH  CLOSET MUSLIM OBAMA SUCKED 

IN FROM THE SAUDIS FOR THEIR PRESIDENTIAL 

LIBRARIES?

THE SAUDIS ROYAL LARDBUCKETS and their boy Obomb:


Let us see if the SAUDIS invaders will finance Obomb’s
PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY like they did Bush and Billary’s!

 


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/09/obama-and-his-crony-saudis-paymasters.html


Selling Out America and Sucking In the Bribes!


THE SAUDIS ROYAL LARDBUCKETS and their boy Obomb:


THE OBAMA AND SAUDIS PARTNERSHIP:

WILL THEY FINANCE HIS LIBRARY AND MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP IN THE MAKING?


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/02/barack-obama-his-saudis-wahhabi.html




How Muslims Take Control of America


American Mosques: Warehouses of Jihad
They do it first by establishing mosques in every town and city.  These meeting places are perfect warehouses of not only indoctrination, but future terrorists, who are made to read and understand the principles of jihad, martyrdom, and Dar-al-Harb ("land of war" – any place not Islamized).
Mosques cost money, and the money for these warehouses of hate is coming straight from Saudi Arabia.  These mosques are being infused with an activist strain of Islam, Wahhabism If you have to ask where the Saudis are getting their money, you are not paying attention...it's coming from you.  According to "The Mosque in America: a National Portrait," a survey released in April 2001, there were at least 1,209 mosques in the U.S.  Today, it's estimated that that number has quadrupled.
Mosque Leaders Promote Sharia
Mosque elders tend to be sent to the U.S. with one clear mission: make sharia law the supreme rule within the United States, using any and all tactics necessary.  

BLOG: THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE MURDERING MUSLIM HAVE DONE IN LONDON.

Next, from within the safety of their local mosques, they begin to use their revolting practices, riotous youth, and wild sermonizing to force genteel Americans to relocate to safer, less threatening neighborhoods and cities.  Of course, not all Americans will move or can afford to do so.  To take control of a town, Muslims will not need to evict everyone.  They probably need about 25% in order to make life very unpleasant for those who do not go along with their demands.
Political Islamist Infiltration
They will elect Muslims to all positions of local influence, who will create and enforce policy according to the Quran.  Once they have control over a town, they will begin to establish informal sharia, and there's nothing the government can (or will want to) do about it.
Sharia is the brutal means by which Islam controls its populations by force, intimidation, and punishments for offenses to Allah. 

BLOG: LOOK AT THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT MEXICO HAS INSTALLED AS OPERATED FROM 50 MEX CONSULATES. THEIR GOAL IS TO EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND THE MEX WELFARE STATE ON OUR BACKS.

Already, in many European countries, national governments have, out of fear, given Islamic fascists the right to establish their own shadow governments within the borders of countries like Sweden, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, and England, where they can control their own populations without accountability.  Proposals for sharia are being taken seriously by Canada.
This is an admission that Islam is not just a religion.  It is a cult.  It seeks total control over a person's mind and body.  As such, our Constitution is totally incompatible with it.  Muslims will push politicians for local control and self-determination of their own laws.  In this way, America will become two nations: a weakened traditional one and a growing, menacing Islamized one.
Islamists Ally with Leftists
At the same time, Muslims will ally with leftist politicians, who will gladly cede some of their power to this group of enforcers, so conservative politicians and Christians who advocate self-defense and sane social policies are kept out of office.  Money that was once used to build mosques will now be used to buy politicians. On university campuses, Islam will be portrayed as righteous and peaceful, while Christianity will be associated with evil Western and American values.  Rebellious American youths (BLM, OWS, antifa, etc.) will eat it up.
There will be increasing local and regional incidents of crimes and threats against Christians, Jews, and anybody who speaks out against the religion of hate.  Terrorism is a completely legitimate tool of Islam and was widely practiced and advocated by Muhammad.  Remember: all words in the Quran are perfect, immutable laws defining an eternal ethic:
Against them (the unbelievers) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly. (Quran 8.06)
Leftist politicians will continue to hold the Bill of Rights over anyone who dares to accuse this religion of wrongdoing.  Islamized citizens will ignore skyrocketing crime and threats.  They will look the other way for fear of retribution, honor killings, and punishments from those who uphold the Islamic requirement to seek revenge on anyone who dishonors or disagrees with Islam.
Eventually, America will become weakened, and politicians will allow the Muslims to do whatever they want, as long as the infidels are allowed to be free of terrorist threats.  As Christianity wanes, people will reject it as an anachronism irrelevant to modern trends.  Islamic ethics will prevail, and Muslim sects will gain members, money, and influence.
Islam Will Destroy Our Constitution
As government policies lean toward Islamic ideals, the Bill of Rights will be seen as archaic and out of touch with contemporary values and the new direction of the country.  It will be just a piece of parchment in a museum, lacking anyone who would be so bold and revolutionary as to fight a religion, even a religion of hate.
Regrettably, a vast ignorance prevails in this sphere.  Academic pundits, leftist journalists, and hired Islamic apologists, useful idiots, proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace and that the great majority of Muslims are not a party to any plans and actions of radicals.
Islam Is Irreconcilable with Our Culture
So how do we stop this sequence of events?  How can our government, which has so effectively protected the rights of peaceful religions, protect us from an aggressive one?  How should we put Islam out of business?
By massive allocation of an educational campaign while simultaneously declaring Islam for what it is: an ideology irreconcilable with our core beliefs enshrined in the universal declaration of human rights and the United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  By treating Islam the way we treated Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and Maoists.  By preventing Islamization of our country by all legal measures and staunchly resisting the creeping sharia in our society.
Perhaps it is time to realize that not all religions are the same.  If a religion does not recognize the constitutional rights of others, it must lose its rights under First Amendment protections.  If it seeks to control all aspects of our life by force and fraud, if it seeks exemption from national laws protecting constitutional rights, then it must not be considered a religion.
It must be called something else, and it cannot be recognized as a protected ideology under the First Amendment.
O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guides not a people unjust. (Quran 5:51)
Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you. (Matthew 5:44)
Any religion or dogma that seeks to create its own government and its own legal system and seeks to mobilize its own militia is itself not interested in separation of church and state and has no right to use that separation to create hegemony.  In fact, such a doctrine is not even a religion at all.  It is a totalitarian regime and must be considered the enemy of everything Americans believe in.
I'd welcome an inspection of other religions to determine if they are truly peaceful, and I am confident that all other faiths will remain protected and unaffected because religions tend to be peaceful.  There is only one faith that seeks global hegemony for a seamless church-state government and imposition of its law everywhere, and that's Islam.

THE CONSPIRACY OF TRAITORS:

THE CLINTON-OBAMA PLAN TO DESTROY 

DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA FOR GLOBALIST 

BILLIONAIRES INCLUDING THEIR PAYMASTER 

GEORGE SOROS!

"When it comes to Islamic terror or shariah imposition, Obama and other globalists preach a type of defenselessness and impotence: something we have to abide. For many liberals, virtue signaling, the epitome of vanity, is more important than saving lives, even the lives of their countrymen."

                                              
Many making the accusations of xenophobia live in rarified societies and neighborhoods or in high-end and fashionable apartment buildings with security guards and doormen, immune from the consequences of Open Borders, loss of manual jobs, overseas nation-building, and the harmful effects arising from perfunctory background checks and superficial vetting.


MUSLIMS: GLOBAL RAPIST AND 
MURDERERS!

But she was blindfolded, beaten with plastic 
cables, suspended by her arms for some time 
and then raped. 

IMAGES OF THE PROPOSED OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY

 

AND MASSIVE MUSLIM MINERET TO CALL MUSLIMS TO PRAYER

 

AND HATRED OF AMERICA.

 

The Obama Presidential Library Will Be Funded by America's 9-11 Invading Saudis  Who Ban Christians and Jews From Their Dictatorship.

 


The Obama Presidential Monument to a Psychopath Will Provide Call to Prayers in the Muslim Tradition With One Massive Minaret

ISN’T OBAMA A CLOSET MUSLIM? LET US SEE WHICH OF THE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIP FUNDS HIS PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY!!!


MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS’ MARKETS IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS TO KILL OFF AMERICA’S WHITE POPULATION TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP FOR ONE BARACK OBAMA, THE “Hope & Change” HUCKSTER FROM CHICAGO.

"The decline in homeownership is one sign of the deep social crisis in the United States. As rents and housing costs have soared, spurred on by financial speculation that has enriched the ruling elites, incomes and jobs for most Americans have shriveled."


SOARING POVERTY AND DRUG ADDICTION UNDER OBAMA

"These figures present a scathing indictment of the social order that prevails in America, the world’s wealthiest country, whose government proclaims itself to be the globe’s leading democracy. They are just one manifestation of the human toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive inequality and mass poverty 

Koran 2:191 “Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them.”
Koran 3:28 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.”
Koran 3:85 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.”
Koran 5:33 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam”
Koran 8:12 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran.”
Koran 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.”
Koran 8:65 “The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.”
Koran 9:5 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.”
Koran 9:28 “The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque.”
Koran 9:30 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”
Koran 9:123 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.”
Koran 22:19 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.”
Koran 47:4 “Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them."
According to Sharia law:• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).

• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.

• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.

• Criticizing or denying Allah is punishable by death (see Allah moon god).

• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death (compulsion in religion).

• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.

• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.

• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.

• Girls’ clitoris should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).

• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.

• A man can beat his wife for insubordination (see Religion of Peace).

• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.

• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.

• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.

• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).

• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.

• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits (see Errors in Quran).

• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).

• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.

• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal”.

• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.

Muslims also believe that homosexuality is punishable by death. Oh and halal death for animals means as long and painful a death as possible for the poor animal. At least with yesterday's march it is now clear beyond any reasonable doubt that the left is against human rights

THE OBAMA AND THE REVOLUTION:

Will His Bid For A Third Term For Life Come About? Will Illegals Vote the La Raza Supremacist Back Into the White House?

DESTROY AMERICA TO BUILD A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP WHERE LA RAZA MEXICANS VOTE HIM PRESIDENT FOR LIFE

"He is intent on maximizing the damage he inflicted on the country during the two terms of his faux presidency, having now set up shop in Washington to pursue a post-presidency agenda advancing a left-wing insurgency, civil unrest, racial conflict and the destabilizing activities of a shadow."


BARACK OBAMA PLANS A THIRD TERM: HIS CRONY BANKSTERS, LA RAZA, MUSLIMS AND THOSE MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS HE FUNDED ARE BEHIND HIM…. Along with George Soros!

THE OBAMA COUP TO BE DICTATOR:

THE ARMY OF ILLEGALS TO BRING AMERICA DOWN AND FORM THE OBAMA MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP THAT WILL BE OPEN BORDERS AND PRO LA RAZA FASCIST SUPREMACY.

                                                  
Daniel Greenfield, the award-winning Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, believes (OBAMA'S POLITICAL PARTY) “OFA will be far more dangerous in the wild than the Clinton Foundation ever was.”

“Barack Obama and his henchmen would not have been emboldened in their ostensible machinations to undermine an election and then a presidency if it were not for the fecklessness of the Republican  Party and the blind eye as well as the tacit support of the mainstream media.”

THE CLINTONS SERVE THEIR 9-11 INVADING 

SAUDIS PAYMASTERS!

DANCING WITH DICTATORS.... BOTH THE CLINTONS ARE EXPERT DANCERS!





Swedish Islamophobia Expert Who Joined ISIS Now Calling For Attacks In Sweden




2

Swedish former “Islamophobia” expert Michael Skråmos, who joined the Islamic State and travelled to Syria, has now called for Islamists to attack targets in Sweden.

Michael Skråmos, an Islamic convert, is one of the many Swedish residents who has travelled to Syria and Iraq to fight for the Islamic State terror group. Living in the ISIS capital of Raqqa, Mr Skråmos has not only tried to recruit for the terror group but has now called for jihadists to attack Sweden itself Swedish broadcaster SVT reports.
The Islamic State capital has come under attack by a coalition of forces which began earlier this month. Skråmos made his comments shortly after in retaliation against the fact that Swedes have volunteered to fight along with Kurdish forces against the Islamic State.
“May the Lord of everything that exists awaken a lion. A Mujahid in Sweden who answer the call of jihad in the middle of the enemy,” Skråmos said.
Skråmo is thought to be one of the 80 to 100 Swedes fighting for the Islamic State in Raqqa as well as another 60 children.
Many were outraged when details emerged that not only was Skråmo collecting welfare benefits while in Sweden but received up to £4,300 from the Swedish government after he’d left the country to fight for ISIS. The Swedish government has seen around 300 separate cases of Islamic extremists claiming some sort of government money from welfare to student loans.
A former expert on multiculturalism and Islamophobia, Skråmo appeared in an ISIS recruitment propaganda video in early 2015.
Jesper Söder of Trollhattan is one of the Swedes fighting against ISIS. “We have American air support bombing Raqqa and ISIS positions that we have selected. There are many civilians who will be panicked to see us, now they see a chance to finally escape,” he said.
Söder added that around 50 ISIS fighters had given up to the coalition force, though said he had not heard of any Swedes being among them.
Many ISIS fighters have returned to Sweden leading to some politicians to call for the government to help the returning jihadis integrate into Swedish society. Several municipalities have even called for free housing, debt forgiveness and driving lessons for the returning fighters.
“There may be criticism, but [I think] that you should get the same help as others who seek help from us. We cannot say that because you made a wrong choice, you have no right to come back and live in our society,” said Municipal coordinator against extremism Anna Sjöstrand.

No comments: