what? you thought our borders protected us from scum like this fucker? think again!
Charges are dropped against the undocumented immigrant who was accused of spiking a co-ed's drink and raping her in her dorm room due to 'lack of evidence'
- Rape charges have been dropped against Colorado man Juan D Contreras
- He was accused in March of spiking a student's drink and then raping her
- The rape allegedly happened February 23 at University of Missouri-Kansas City
- Charges were dropped because prosecutors say there was enough evidence
Rape charges have been dropped against Juan D Contreras, who is from Greely, Colorado. He was accused of spiking a student's drink and then raping her
Rape charges have been dropped against an alleged illegal immigrant who was accused of raping a female student in a dorm room at the University of Missouri - Kansas City.
Juan D Contreras, who is from Greely, Colorado, was charged in March of spiking a student's drink and then raping her.
On Monday prosecutors dismissed the case after deciding there wasn't enough evidence to find the 22-year-old guilty.
Michael Mansur, a spokesman for the Jackson County Prosecutor's Office, told the Kansas City Star the decision was made after lengthy discussions with the victim and witnesses.
'We determined we would not be able to meet our burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt at trial,' Mansur explained.
He said that UMKC police have been notified of the decision.
The attack allegedly happened on February 23 at Johnson Hall (pictured) on the University of Missouri- Kansas City's campus
Contreras, who isn't a student at the university, was released from jail on Tuesday.
According to multiple reports he is an undocumented immigrant, so he may have been taken into federal custody following that release.
The attack allegedly happened on February 23 at Johnson Hall on the university's campus.
The victim told police she doesn't remember anything that happened after consuming a drink Contreras bought for her.
Contreras was allegedly seen carrying the unconscious victim to her dorm room that evening.
She said she remembers waking up and noticing that her clothing had been removed.
According to court documents, when she asked Contreras what happened, he told her they had sex.
When the story became public students protested the university's initial response for being too slow, in addition to the school's sexual assault policies.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4948836/Rape-charges-dropped-against-undocumented-immigrant.html#ixzz4uYr6OUGR
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Maryland Needs To Get A Grip On Their Statutory Rape Laws, Including For Illegal Immigrants
You probably heard about the horrible and politically charged rape case out of Maryland which was reported back in March. Two immigrant students, at least one of whom was in the country illegally (the other claims to be on a special student program, but the details are unclear), were accused of luring a 14 year old girl into a school bathroom, sexually assaulting her, filming it and sending the video around. Many conservative outlets as well as the White House pointed to the case as yet another example of why we need to crack down on illegal immigration. (Which isn’t really up for debate in any event… we do need to.)
The Maryland case took a shocking turn this week, however, when Maryland authorities announced that most of the charges were being dropped and the story wasn’t as it first seemed. (CBS Baltimore)
Montgomery County prosecutors made the bombshell decision to drop rape charges against two teenagers who are undocumented immigrants.17-year-old Jose Montano and 18-year-old Henry Sanchez Milian came to the United States illegally through Central America just months before police alleged they sexually assaulted a 14-year-old classmate inside Rockville High School in March.Montgomery County State’s Attorney John McCarthy says the facts in the case do not support the charges.“We have concluded that the facts in this case do not support the original charges filed in this matter, do to [sic] the lack of corroboration and substantial inconsistencies from the facts that we have obtained from multiple sources since the filing of the original charging document.
How the charges could suddenly be dropped was immediately both shocking and outrageous to me. It just didn’t make sense. CNN covered the story further and included some comments from the prosecutor which simply flew in the face of reality. (Emphasis added)
Defense attorneys had said that the sexual encounter between the defendants and the 14-year-old girl was consensual.“There were no scratches, no bruises. There was no hitting, there was no screaming, there was no running immediately to some sort of security officer,” Sanchez-Milian’s attorney Andrew Jezic said at the time.Sanchez-Milian allegedly received sexually explicit images from the 17-year-old student also charged in the case.
Okay, so several of the key elements of the original allegations have clearly changed. Apparently the 14 year old girl wasn’t physically forced into the stall and was, perhaps, actively participating in the sexual encounters. Also, according to this new information, she filmed the abuse herself and sent the video to the two assailants who then passed it around further. But none of this changes one underlying fact which nobody involved in the investigation seems to be mentioning. It’s still rape, or at least it most certainly should be.
The age of consent in Maryland is 16 and at least until recently they didn’t have any form of “Romeo and Juliet law” which provides exceptions for children engaged in sexual activity who are close to the same age. Unfortunately it looks like they later included a provision which states that a fourteen year old can “give consent” if the other person is within four years of her age. In this case the girl is fourteen and the two individuals who assaulted her were 17 and 18. At least one, if not both, are legally adults. This is statutory rape in concept if not by definition in Maryland, even if some states are bending the rules. We’ve had an accepted premise in this country for some time now that the sex in a case like this could not have been consensual because a 14 year old child can not legally give meaningful consent.
Clearly something had already gone horribly wrong in that child’s home if she found it to be an acceptable idea to engage in sexual activity with an adult male in a bathroom, to say nothing of filming the event and forwarding the file. But that doesn’t make it her fault. That’s a shortcoming in the family and the community which does not excuse the behavior of either of the men who did this. But the media is somehow treating this story as a case of “Trump being wrong” about blaming illegal immigrants. Sending around child pornography (the rapists did forward the video even if they didn’t record it themselves) is still a serious charge and it’s more than sufficient grounds to deport the illegal immigrant in question.
But even if leave aside all of the politics and immigration policy, it’s time for Maryland and other states to take a fresh look at their statutory rape laws. The exceptions I mentioned above were supposed to be designed so that high school sweethearts who are within a couple years of age and foolishly engage in adult sexual activity wouldn’t wind up going to jail. I completely support those types of exceptions and feel that it’s up to the family to teach children right from wrong in such circumstances. But these two men were not this young girl’s “boyfriends” and if existing law allows for something like this to happen and see them walk free, the wheels have come off the legal cart.
WE CAN'T HELP OUR OWN AND YET WE HAND MILLIONS OF JOBS AND BILLIONS IN WELFARE TO BORDER JUMPERS!
JOE LEGAL v LA RAZA JOSE ILLEGAL
Here’s how it breaks down; will make you want to be an illegal!
October 4, 2017
Illegal Immigration: An Economic Poison Pill
The conversation surrounding illegal immigration is deeply personal for many people -- it is emotionally-charged and politically divisive. Debates often devolve into mud-slinging contests, and arguments morph into feigned outrage, even violent protests. But from an economic perspective the question is settled science: illegal aliens cost taxpayers billions, impoverish American workers, and are completely unnecessary for America’s economic success.
To begin with, illegal immigrants are expensive. According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s 2017 report, illegal immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not an outlier: a recent study by theHeritage Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants (including those here illegally) cost Americans trillions over the course of their lifetimes, and a study from the National Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration costs America over $140 billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are a massive burden on American taxpayers.
Although border control is a federal responsibility, state and local governments shoulder two-thirds of the costs associated with illegal immigration. Unsurprisingly, this costs California more than any other state: California spends$30.3 billion on illegal aliens annually -- 17.7 percent of the state budget. Texas is next: illegal immigration costs the State of Texas $12.4 billion annually, or roughly 10 percent of the state's budget. In third place is New York, which spends $7.4 billion on illegal immigration.
Of course, the tax burden is only part of the story: illegal immigration also distorts the labor market, hurting American workers. Ever hear of the law of supply and demand? It is how the free market determines prices: when demand increases, prices increase (more people bid-up the price); conversely, when supply increases, prices decrease (less scarcity means less urgency), and vice versa. Supply and demand underpins the price of everything from gasoline, to apples, to the value of a person’s labor -- surgeons command high prices because there is a limited supply of surgeons, whereas store clerks make minimum wage because anyone can be a store clerk.
According to Pew Research, illegal immigration has flooded America’s labor market with at least 12 million new workers. This has dramatically, and rapidly increased the labor supply and therefore decreased wages for American workers. Ample evidence supports this claim. For example, before Hurricane Harvey, President Trump’s crackdown on illegal aliens had already caused wages for construction workers to rise by 30 percent in Texas (half of Texas’ construction workers were illegal aliens). Likewise,businesses in Maine were forced to hire American workers after the availability of visas for temporary foreign workers were restricted. As a result, unemployment decreased, wages increased, and working conditions improved in order to attract American workers. Illegal labor has distorted America’s labor markets, and hurt American workers in the process.
Finally, America’s economy will not collapse without easy access to illegal labor.
The standard refrain can be summed up as: “we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won’t do.” This is nonsense for two reasons. First, the claim is predicated upon the false assumption that America’s labor market is saturated and requires more workers to continue growing. This could not be further from the truth: right now fewer that 150 million Americans (out of 320 million) are employed, likewise there are 23 million Americans currently looking for work -- twice the number of illegal aliens in the country. Even assuming that every illegal aliens was employed, replacing them with American workers would still leave 11 million Americans unemployed.
Second, the claim is undermined by actual labor statistics. According to theBureau of Labor Statistics, millions of Americans -- of all races -- currently work as janitors, laborers, and agricultural workers. In fact, only four percent of American agricultural workers are illegal aliens, according to a report in theNational Review, putting to bed the myth that we would starve without illegal laborers. Clearly Americans are willing to work any job, provided they are compensated at fair market value -- this is not currently happening precisely because many illegals work under-the-table.
Believe it or not, states without illegal immigrants, like Montana or Ohio, are not economic backwaters with exorbitantly high costs of living -- people in Idaho can still afford McDonald’s and Starbucks, they just pay teenagers to work the drive-thrus. In fact, the cost of living in said states is often cheaper, because their governments do not require high taxes to subsidize legions of illegal aliens.
It is also worth mentioning that America is the only developed nation, until very recently, that imports millions of illegal immigrants to work in its service sector -- other rich nations like Japan and Canada, do not. Yet despite this, the GDP per capita of Japan has actually grown faster than America’s during the same period. The same is true of Canada and Australia. If illegal immigration is such an economic bonanza, why are Americans being left behind by nations without this “advantage”?
University professors, Silicon Valley CEOs, and politicians are not losing their jobs to illegals -- ordinary folk are. Illegal immigration is a contentious issue, but it remains important to couch policy discussions in facts -- not just abstract principles.
The Cost of Illegal Immigration to
Taxpayers is Growing at an Unsustainable
Pace
Taxpayers is Growing at an Unsustainable
Pace
By Spencer Raley
The Hill, September 28, 2017
The majority of the costs to taxpayers, $89 billion (66 percent), are borne at the local and state level. This means that American taxpayers are forced to bear the costs of the federal government’s failure to secure our borders every time they pay school taxes, local tolls, sales and excise taxes. It also means that illegal migrants get a lot of benefits that they don’t pay for.
Conversely, by a 5-to-1 ratio, the taxes paid by illegal immigrants wind up in federal coffers. Despite states bearing most of the costs associated with illegal immigration, the federal government receives 15.4 billion of their tax receipts, compared to $3.5 billion received by states and localities.
Conversely, by a 5-to-1 ratio, the taxes paid by illegal immigrants wind up in federal coffers. Despite states bearing most of the costs associated with illegal immigration, the federal government receives 15.4 billion of their tax receipts, compared to $3.5 billion received by states and localities.
U.S. Taxpayers Have Spent More Than $80 Billion on ‘Dreamers’
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/shock-us-taxpayers-have-spent-more-than-100-billion-on-schooling-welfare-for-daca-immigrants/
ILLEGALS & WELFARE
70% OF ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
CIS
K-12 education, WIC, Medicaid for illegal
immigrants brought as children adds up to
large price tag
JUDICIAL WATCH:
“The greatest criminal threat to the daily lives of
American citizens are the Mexican drug cartels.”
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United States. Mexican drug cartels are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
EXCLUSIVE PHOTOS:
Another Clandestine Cartel Crematorium Discovered near Texas Border
REYNOSA, Tamaulipas — Mexican authorities continue looking into the discovery of a clandestine human incineration operation where the Gulf Cartel burned the bodies of their victims.
The discovery occurred when neighbors of the Revolucion Obrera neighborhood complained of weird smells and the suspicion that a house was being used to burn bodies. Authorities arrived at the location and found that regular home was a cartel crematorium.
Inside the house, forensic investigators with the Tamaulipas Attorney General’s Office discovered various corpses and body parts in stages of incineration and decomposition. Some of the human remains were only superficially incinerated, while others were mostly turned into charred ashes.
The discovery comes as two rival factions of the Gulf Cartel continue fighting for control of this city. Since early May, the factions carried out hundreds of kidnappings, drive-by attacks, and more than 190 confirmed murders; however, the real numbers could actually be much higher.
One of the strategies used by both factions of the Gulf Cartel involves the kidnapping of lookouts, foot soldiers, and street-level dealers. As Breitbart Texas has reported, these victims are often tortured and murdered with their bodies either being dumped in shallow, clandestine grave sites or are incinerated.
Known as “cocinar” or “guiso”, the practice involves the use of 55-gallon drums that are filled with wood, old tires, and fuel to keep the flames burning while cartel members throw human remains into the fire. As Breitbart Texas reported, the practice is used by the Gulf Cartel in the rural areas around Reynosa. The most recent discovery appears to be unique in nature since it is the first time that a “cocina” was discovered inside the city.
Editor’s Note: Breitbart Texas traveled to the Mexican States of Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Nuevo León to recruit citizen journalists willing to risk their lives and expose the cartels silencing their communities. The writers would face certain death at the hands of the various cartels that operate in those areas including the Gulf Cartel and Los Zetas if a pseudonym were not used. Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles are published in both English and in their original Spanish. This article was written by “A.C. Del Angel” from Tamaulipas.
No comments:
Post a Comment