When Biden took office, one of his first acts was the elimination of our border security. Like a power-hungry dictator, Biden simply decided to ignore our immigration laws. His catastrophic border policy resulted in untold millions of unidentified foreign citizens from around the world pouring into our country. Its impact is now being felt in cities across the country. The worst is yet to come. PETER LEMISKA - AND WE'RE ALREADY THERE!!!
Saturday, November 4, 2017
THE HILLARY & BILLARY CRIME TIDAL WAVE: THEIR ASSAULT ON AMERICA'S ELECTION PROCESS - THE RIGGING OF THE 2016 NOMINATION CAMPAIGN
depravity that is the Clinton soul." By Robert Arvay
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
"And it really is the mother of all scandals.
Allowing the sale of 20% of US uranium for
money. The biggest breach in national security
since the Rosenbergs gave away the atomic bomb
secrets to the Soviet Union."
"And did we forget the Clinton Foundation? As Fox News legal analyst Greg Jarrett notes, it was used in an influence peddling schemeto enrich the Clintons and advance their political ambitions, colluding with the Russians to, among other things, sell 20 percent of our uranium supplies to interests and donors aligned with Moscow:" BLOG: BOTH OF OBAMA'S ATTORNEY GENERALS, ERIC HOLDER AND LORETTA LYNCH WERE CHOSEN BECAUSE OF THEIR LONG HISTORY IN LAW PRACTICES THAT SERVED OBAMA'S CRONY CRIMINAL BANKSTERS. BOTH HOLDER AND LYNCH HAVE RETURNED TO WALL STREET WHERE THEY WILL SERVE THE BIGGEST CRIMINAL BANKS IN HISTORY. "Apparently, it isn't politically correct to talk about such high crimes. That may be the opinion of our absentee attorney general, who has turned a blind eye not only to this shocking ad, but also to Hillary's potentially treasonous sellout of 20% of America's uranium to the Russians, for a $145-million payment to her, um, charitable foundation." By Cherie Zaslawsky
Former Democratic chairman
reveals Clinton rigging of 2016 nomination campaign
By
Patrick Martin
4 November 2017
The Hillary Clinton campaign used its financial resources to take
control of the Democratic National Committee more than six months before the
first primary vote, using the party machinery to insure Clinton won the
presidential nomination, according to a new book by a top Democratic insider.
Donna Brazile, longtime vice chairman of the party, campaign
manager for Al Gore in 2000, and interim chairman of the DNC from July 2016 to
February 2017, makes the explosive revelation in her newly published
account, Hacks: The Inside
Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns that Put Donald Trump in the White House.
A chapter of the book was excerpted Thursday on the Politico web
site, under the headline, “Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the
DNC.” Brazile writes that soon after she became interim chairman after the
Democratic convention in July 2016, she began investigating charges of
collaboration between the previous DNC chair, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
and the Clinton campaign.
She discovered in the DNC files a signed agreement between the
Clinton campaign and the DNC, dated August 2015, in which the Clinton campaign
was given effective control of DNC decision-making in return for bailing out
the DNC financially.
The DNC was near bankruptcy, and Clinton campaign manager Robbie
Mook agreed to pay off its $10 million debt and provide a monthly stipend,
which ultimately totaled another $10 million. Brazile continues: “in exchange
for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s
finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of
refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make
final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult
with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and
mailings.”
Brazile admits the grossly anti-democratic character of this
arrangement, given that the Democratic presidential nomination was a contest between
at least five candidates at that point, two of them, Clinton and Sanders, with
substantial support. In all previous such contested races, the rules of the DNC
had required it to remain neutral.
“The funding arrangement with HFA and the victory fund agreement
was not illegal,” she claims, “but it sure looked unethical. If the fight had
been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters
had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as
I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”
Brazile is defensive about the legality of the arrangement, for
good reason: it involved a brazen effort to evade restrictions imposed by
federal campaign finance laws, which limit to $2,700 the amount that an individual
can give to a presidential campaign.
Under the deal brokered with the DNC, wealthy donors could pump
$353,400 into the party’s coffers, $10,000 to each of 32 state parties that
participated in the scam, and $33,400 to the DNC itself, in each case, the maximum
allowed under federal law. All these funds would be deposited in the accounts
of the various state parties and the DNC. Most states would send their money
back to the DNC, and the DNC would funnel the whole sum to the Clinton
campaign. In the end, the state parties retained less than one percent of the
$82 million raised in this effort.
Similar money trails have been a staple of both Democratic and
Republican fund-raising efforts for the last several presidential election
cycles, but the 2016 campaign was the first in which such flimflam was
conducted before the party had selected a presidential nominee, and months
before a single vote had been cast in a caucus or primary.
There are several important aspects of the Brazile account. It
confirms that the DNC emails released by WikiLeaks—which the US intelligence
agencies and the media claim, without providing evidence, were obtained through
Russian hackers—provided an accurate picture of the collaboration between top
DNC officials and the Clinton campaign. The leaked emails were damaging to
Clinton because they were true, not because they were false, or “fake news.”
Some 12 million people, with a preponderance of youth and
students, voted for Bernie Sanders in the Democratic primaries and caucuses,
attracted by his claim to be a socialist and his denunciation of the grip of
“millionaires and billionaires” on the US economy and political system.
But he was seeking the presidential nomination of one of the two
parties controlled by the billionaires and unshakably committee to their
interests, as demonstrated by the blatant purchase of the DNC for $20 million
by Hillary Clinton, the favored candidate of the financial aristocracy in 2016.
The US ruling elite was shocked and surprised by the mass support
for a candidate claiming to be socialist—none more so than Sanders himself. His
major service to Wall Street was to divert this popular following back into
safe channels, by wrapping up his campaign and throwing his support to Hillary
Clinton at the convention.
Brazile notes in her memoir that she called Sanders in September
2016 to tell him about her discovery of a formal agreement between the Clinton
campaign and the DNC. “I had promised Bernie when I took the helm of the
Democratic National Committee after the convention that I would get to the
bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process,”
she writes.
She described the joint fund-raising agreement between the Clinton
campaign and the DNC, telling Sanders, “I’ve completed my review of the DNC and
I did find the cancer,” but pleading with him, “But I will not kill the
patient.”
Brazile continues: “Bernie took this stoically. He did not yell or
express outrage. Instead he asked me what I thought Hillary’s chances were. The
polls were unanimous in her winning but what, he wanted to know, was my own
assessment?”
This gives a glimpse of the real politics of Sanders, who agreed
to Brazile’s entreaty not to “kill the patient,” i.e., expose the Democratic
Party and the Clinton campaign by making public this stinking backroom deal.
Some of Sanders’s former campaign aides have vocally denounced the
DNC and the Clinton campaign in the wake of Brazile’s revelations. Mark Longabaugh,
a former adviser, called the DNC-Clinton deal “outrageous,” while former
campaign manager Jeff Weaver called it “egregious” and “undemocratic,” while
described the fundraising scheme as “a laundering operation.”
But Sanders himself continued to downplay the revelation,
suggesting that to focus on the 2016 campaign was a diversion from opposing the
policies of the Trump administration. After President Trump tweeted about the
Brazile book, calling for a Justice Department investigation, Sanders responded,
also on Twitter, “We won't be distracted from your efforts to give billionaires
tax cuts, take health care from millions and deny climate change.”
The FBI and the Deep-State. James Comey. Eric Holder. Loretta Lynch. The Clintons. Barrack Obama. The leftist news media. Real collusion, with a real crime.
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY.... RIGHT INTO THE PHONY CLINTON CHARITY FOUNDATION!
Rep. DeSantis: ‘We Know Now Without a Shadow of a Doubt’ Hillary and Democrats Colluded with Russia
Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) spoke with Breitbart News DailySiriusXM host Alex Marlow on Thursday regarding a proposed Mueller amendment to limit the special counsel investigation to between March 2015 and the present, and also tax reform in the House.
“We know now without a shadow of a doubt that the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, paid Fusion GPS and Steele to acquire this dossier, which required colluding with Russian operatives and Russian nationals. So, they produced this dossier and I believe, yesterday I called for the FBI, the Justice Department to declassify all the FISA applications involving Trump associates because what I think happened is, I think they used the information from this dossier to be able to get surveillance on Trump and his associates.”
“And then the fruits of that,” he continued, “formed the basis of what had been leaked to the press over the first three or four months of Trump’s White House.”
DeSantis also discussed the Uranium One scandal and the pending tax reform bill in detail. The full audio is available below.
Breitbart News Daily airs on SiriusXM Patriot 125 weekdays from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Eastern.
There is an answer to Hillary’s question, “What Happened?”
And yes, it should be considered a dumb question rather than a book title. But the short answer to her question is: She fooled almost the entire left, for over two decades. Oh wait, that was a book title, not a question.
And therein lies her biggest problem. She’s not really asking the question as she should be, she’s not reflecting. Instead, she’s wagging a finger and blaming everyone else for her loss.
Back to the Clintons fooling the left. Let’s start counting the ways. She was not just smart, she was the smartest woman ever. She was fully competent and capable in everything. She fought bravely for all the right issues. She was more qualified to be President than anyone who preceded her. She was, and is, the bright moral compass pointing the way forward to the left (who they believe should be all of us). She was the Yin to her husband’s Yang. They were the best power couple ever, a beacon of truth shining in the darkness.
Except they weren’t. She has proved that over time, and her book tour is confirming it.
And the left is about to melt down as she and hubby finally are revealed for who they are. Who are they? In a nutshell, they are the left’s version of Elmer Gantry: frauds who love adulation, and even more, love money, power, and fame. If you think the left melted down when Trump won, wait until they have the scales fall from their eyes as this new scandal engulfs her and her party.
Because this is the mother of all scandals.
Trump has used his branding genius on this scandal already. He called it this generation’s Watergate. Which has to grate on the left, the media has once again been duly trolled. After all, nothing was worse than Richard Nixon. Ever. Now, most have heard the media scoundrels use the term dog-whistle. It’s overused, and abused on the left, a smirk, a knowing wink and they all come alive, cackling when they use it. Well, Trump just whistled for them. "Watergate, Modern Age."
Watergate. The Holy Grail of the left’s media triumph.
But he has done more than just dog-whistle, or throw the media a tweet to drive them crazy. He’s been slowly amassing information and evidence about the mother of all scandals. Tom Clancy at his best could not have written a more exciting thriller. Which is what we are watching.
I have a burning question. What did the President (Trump) know, and when did he know it? Because if there has ever been a more exquisite time to bear down and stay on this scandal, it’s now. My take: He has slowly amassed a giant dossier of evidence, but this one isn’t fake, it’s very real. He announced it. Listen to the dog-whistle.
“Watergate, Modern Age.”
Trump has many sides, and one of them is his rough and tumble, shoot from the hip side. Say things that shouldn’t be said, tweet at four in the morning to drive his enemies crazy. Keep moving, keep pressing, never back down. Never surrender to political correctness. Show them shiny objects as distraction, but stay the course.
Another side, seldom paid attention to, is his ability to craft a long-term strategy. Couple that with his highly developed instincts about how to implement that strategy, and you have one formidable opponent on your hands. One who loves to win. One who formulates a goal, and pursues it relentlessly.
Ask his GOP primary opponents. Ask Hillary. On second thought, don’t, because she will never know what happened to her, because she never wanted to know what was happening. She was too busy luxuriating in her ill-gotten gains. While she was breaking out rare champagne on her campaign plane, Trump was busy visiting the battleground states. While she celebrated prematurely, he was in Grand Rapids, Michigan in the early morning of November 8, with a final push to eke out that state’s electoral votes.
It’s this side of Trump that we are witnessing.
The left’s being fooled began a long time ago, but the country began to see it when they had a massive hissy fit about Hillary losing. Safe spaces and therapy were all they had to comfort them. And “resisting.” We all have witnessed their psychosis for the better part of a year now. One ugly toddler tantrum after another. And it’s not just their leaders and media stooges.
As a nation we have just endured, and will continue to endure the Weinstein scandal, and have seen the squalid underbelly of the left’s cultural greats. The collusion to hide just how ugly, hypocritical, and immoral the culture of the left, as embodied by Hollywood, is out there for the entire country to see. This is who the left is. Ugly, hypocritical, greedy, and without conscience.
And on the left they’re shocked, shocked to see just how squalid they all are. All the actors and actresses who benefited from their silence suddenly are not so silent. So brave, all these years later. But they put up with everything they preen on about hating, and put up with it for decades while making money and having fame. The left has been in CYA mode for weeks now over this scandal, trying so hard to get people to look elsewhere, anywhere but linking it to one of the Democratic Party’s most faithful fundraisers and bundlers. He was the Clinton’s good friend. This was a big wound to the left, and will fester.
The big shoe dropped when Trump branded the Uranium One scandal in his impromptu press conference. It had to be covered. And Hillary Clinton has now responded. With denials. Sarah Huckabee Sanders has doubled down, saying:
"I think that this further proves if there was anyone that was colluding with the Russians to influence the election look no further than the Clintons and the DNC. Hypocrisy at the highest level and a new low in politics. Everything the Clinton campaign and DNC were falsely accusing the president of doing the past year they were doing it themselves."
And now the FBI witness has been cleared to speak to Congress.
And now there are calls for new congressional investigations. And calls for special counsels to investigate the Uranium One deal.
And the Republicans have grown a spine, joining in these calls. The theory of evolution is proven. Jellyfish evolve.
As the weekend began Friday night, the reaction came: word was leaked that a charge has been referred to a grand jury by Special Counsel Mueller, with an indictment and arrest expected as early as today. It is a choreographed diversion, providing an excuse for Hillary’s media allies to avert their gaze from the unfolding trap. The question is, is it the “deep state” Mueller trying to shift away from the Clinton scandals that have erupted, or is Mueller simply doing his job well?
Leaks over the weekend also suggest this is about Manafort’s associations with the Podesta Group, and not Trump. Leaks suggest it is about illicit money transfers, aka money laundering, back in 2012 and even in earlier years. Obviously, that has nothing to do with Trump.
Either way, all of Trump’s ducks are lining up. Even if Mueller is indicting someone to obfuscate and change the news cycle, the jig is up. There is too much information exploding about Uranium One, and it’s not going away. If he indicts Manafort over his ties to the Podesta Group, then the news cycle is about to explode. I suspect this is what is happening, but we should know today. Trump’s position looks good, he looks happy when he talks, and has for many weeks. He is in control. He sees the long game, and knows he is holding all the cards. It appears he has entrapped them all in this scandal called Uranium One. The FBI and the Deep-State. James Comey. Eric Holder. Loretta Lynch. The Clintons. Barrack Obama. The leftist news media. Real collusion, with a real crime.
And it really is the mother of all scandals. Allowing the sale of 20% of US uranium for money. The biggest breach in national security since the Rosenbergs gave away the atomic bomb secrets to the Soviet Union.
All of Trump’s ducks are lining up. Trump looks happy when he talks, and has for many weeks. He is in control. He sees the long game, and knows he is holding all the cards.
It appears he has entrapped them all in this scandal called Uranium One. The FBI and the Deep-State. James Comey. Eric Holder. Loretta Lynch. The Clintons. Barrack Obama. The leftist news media. Real collusion, with a real crime.
And it really is the mother of all scandals. Allowing the sale of 20% of US uranium for money. The biggest breach in national security since the Rosenbergs gave away the atomic bomb secrets to the Soviet Union.
VIDEO:
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S LEADING LAP
DANCERS:
Hillary, Billary, Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb….. new definitions of
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom THE LIFE OF HILLARY CLINTON: AMORAL PSYCHOPATH and GLOBAL
LOOTER OF THE POOR….. But she served Obama’s crony bank$ter$ well!
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
THE DIRTY DEALS of DIRTY HILLARY….. looting anything that moves!
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
Donald Trump Challenges Jeff Sessions: ‘Where Is Our Justice Department’ on Hillary Clinton?
President Donald Trump signaled frustration with the Justice Department’s failure to respond to the ongoing scandals involving the Clinton family, the DNC, the FBI, and the “phony” Russian sourced dossier.
“A lot of people are disappointed in the Justice Department, including me,” Trump told reporters at the White House on Friday morning before leaving for his trip to Asia.
Trump said that the Justice Department should be investigating Democrats and the Clintons, sharing several observations on Twitter.
“This is real collusion and dishonesty,” Trump wrote on Twitter Thursday night, responding to Donna Brazile’s revelation that Hillary Clinton’s campaign was controlling DNC operations and fundraising well before winning her primary.
“Major violation of Campaign Finance Laws and Money Laundering – where is our Justice Department?” Trump wondered.
The president appears unhappy with Attorney General Jeff Sessions failure to investigate the Clintons, despite recent revelations about their “crooked” behavior.
Trump said he thought Clinton’s “deleted E-mails, Uranium, Podesta, the Server, plus, plus…” all deserved closer scrutiny.
“People are angry,” Trump continued on Twitter. “At some point the Justice Department, and the FBI, must do what is right and proper. The American public deserves it!”
Trump also spoke about his frustration with the Justice Department in an interview with WMAL’s Larry O’Connor.
“The saddest thing is because I’m the President of the United States, I’m not supposed to be involved in the Justice Department, I am not supposed to be involved in the FBI,” Trump said. “I’m not supposed to be doing the kinds of things I would love to be doing and I’m very frustrated by it.”
Trump indicated that he wanted the Justice Department to investigate the Clintons.
“I look at what’s going on with the Justice Department, well, why aren’t they going after Hillary Clinton with her emails and dossier?” he asked. “It’s very discouraging to me. To be honest, I’m very unhappy about it.”
Trump signaled frustration with Attorney General Jeff Sessions for failing to target the Clintons.
“Everybody is asking why the Justice Department (and FBI) isn’t looking into all of the dishonesty going on with Crooked Hillary & the Dems,” Trump wrote on Twitter.
The president, however, appeared to be aware that he could not order the Justice Department to investigate.
“As a president, you’re not supposed to be involved in that process,” he admitted to Ingraham. “But hopefully are doing something. At some point, maybe we’re going to have it out.”
Bitter Hillary Supporters Blast Donna Brazile, Elizabeth Warren on Twitter over Rigged Primary Revelation
Following Donna Brazile and Elizabeth Warren’s allegations that the DNC rigged the 2016 primary elections against Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton supporters took to Twitter to express their anger.
Former interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, Donna Brazile, recently claimed that Hillary Clinton’s team took control of the DNC before she won the primary elections against Bernie Sanders. Elizabeth Warren corroborated Brazile’s claims, leading to many Hillary Clinton supporters expressing their anger at the two Democratic politicians via Twitter.
Failed Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean incorrectly stated that “no one has said the primaries were rigged.” Despite Warren herself agreeing to exactly that on video.
Whether correct or not, Donna Brazile's handling and timing right before her book comes out make her actions seem more about lining her pockets than about helping the country or the Democratic party. #DonnaBrazile#resist#FridayFeeling
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolanor email him at lnolan@breitbart.com
Just about all the associations the Democrats counted on to burnish their appeal to the public are in the process of discrediting themselves. The theory of branding tells us that associating one brand with another desirable brand helps it take on some of the luster. That’s why you see so many product endorsements, for instance.
For decades we have seen images of prominent Dems and Hollywood icons together, so much so that the brands are somewhat intertwined, meaning people feel sort of the same way about one as about the other. Somewhat glamorous, or at least familiar. People we enjoy. Sometimes, even people we admire or even trust.
So, when one falls out of favor, the other tends to follow. That’s why scandals lead to cancellation of endorsements.
Hollywood is only the first citadel of evangelical liberalism, eager to mingle its brand with the Democrats so as to bring about political recruits. The #MeToo ethic of speaking out is spreading, and the details get gorier.
The key to understand the real impact of the spreading disillusionment is that many of the abusers coming to light were widely known to be harassers and were tolerated in the larger community. Everyone bought in, and were equally hypocritical, preaching their feminism as liberal intersectional dogma requires.
Now, it is turning out that a wide swath of supposedly enlightened progressive media figures have been somewhere on the spectrum between cad and criminal. Even in the refined (aka, pretentious) reaches of liberal media, purported intellectuals have behaved like brutish cave men.
Meanwhile, the Clinton Machine is being exposed for its Uranium One perfidy. There is evidence, and it is going to be revealed to Congress. Despite all the chaff thrown into the air around the AG’s purported inactivity (in truth: if something is underway, we do not know about it), facts and evidence are coming out. Nothing will happen overnight, if all the i’s are being dotted and t’s crossed.
Donna Brazile is the first Democrat insider to squeal on Hillary to try to save herself from taint and maybe legal jeopardy. There is every danger of the dam breaking, as it has with sexual abuse in Hollywood.
All of these associations are going to get worse before they get better. It takes time for brands to change, but they do.
The Democrats may be in as big brand trouble as the NFL.
Rigging the Democrats’ nomination is just the icing on the cake when it comes to activity meriting a thorough investigation of criminal activity by the woman who, only a year ago, was presumed to become the 45th president. Don’t forget Uranium One, Fusion GPS, keeping classified emails on an unsecured private server, deleting 33,000 emails under subpoena, and, well, you get the idea. Unfortunately, our AWOL AG Jeff Sessions, whose face was last seen on the side of a milk carton, does not. So, we are left with the absurdity of a special counsel looking into Trump-Russia collusion, where there is none, while overlooking the multiple Clinton elephants in the room.
The revelation that both the DNC and the Hillary Clinton campaign were funneling money through a law firm to Fusion GPS to produce a slimy and fake dossier on Trump culled from foreign sources was bad enough. Now we find, courtesy of the one truthful and remorseful Democrat on this planet, former DNC Chairperson Donna Brazile, that the DNC was bought and paid for by Hillary Clinton, who probably violated multiple FEC campaign laws in rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders and shifted cash around in a manner that could only be called -- what’s the word Robert Mueller would use? Ah, yes, money-laundering:
In an excerpt from her upcoming book, Brazile says she discovered a document that explained why the Clinton campaign had such a stranglehold on the DNC. It was published in Politico Thursday.
“When I got back from a vacation in Martha’s Vineyard,” she wrote, “I at last found the document that described it all: the Joint Fund-Raising Agreement between the DNC, the Hillary Victory Fund, and Hillary for America.”
The agreement—signed by Amy Dacey, the former CEO of the DNC, and Robby Mook with a copy to Marc Elias — specified that in exchange for raising money and investing in the DNC, Hillary would control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised. Her campaign had the right of refusal of who would be the party communications director, and it would make final decisions on all the other staff. The DNC also was required to consult with the campaign about all other staffing, budgeting, data, analytics, and mailings.
Hillary Clinton staged a political coup worthy of a banana republic. Brazile has confirmed that Hillary Clinton was engaging in money-laundering to help her campaign.
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders’ campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, on Monday criticized a Hillary Clinton campaign fundraising scheme that state party leaders told Politico has been used as a self-serving “money-laundering” conduit.
Despite Clinton’s pledges to rebuild state parties, Politico found that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Victory Fund has stayed in the state parties’ coffers.
“Secretary Clinton is looting funds meant for the state parties to skirt fundraising limits on her presidential campaign,” Weaver said. “We think the Clinton campaign should let the state parties keep their fair share of the cash.”
Sanders’ and Clinton’s primary campaigns both raised about $26 million in April, but Politico documented how the Hillary Victory Fund, a supposedly joint fundraising committee, has been exploited to inflate her presidential primary campaign.
“Secretary Clinton has exploited the rules in ways that let her high-dollar donors like Alice Walton of Wal-Mart fame and the actor George Clooney and his super-rich Hollywood friends skirt legal limits on campaign ontributions,” Weaver added. “If Secretary Clinton can’t raise the funds needed to run in a competitive primary without resorting to laundering, how will she compete against Donald Trump in a general election?”
Turns out that even with money-laundering, Hillary couldn’t win. On a recent edition of Fox News Sunday. House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, noted that in addition to laundering her campaign cash through her wholly-owned subsidiary, the DNC, Hillary Clinton used a law firm to funnel cash to Russia-linked Fusion GPS:
Gowdy said, “I’m not an election law expert, but the good news is you don’t have to be to understand the absurdity believing you can just launder all of your campaign money by just hiring a law firm. Imagine if you and I were running for Congress, and we just hired a law firm and said ‘Hey, you go to all the opposition, you go buy all the television, you go buy all the bumper stickers, you go hire all the experts, and we will launder all of this through a law firm. I can’t think of anything that defeats the purpose of transparency laws more than that.”
He continued, “I am interested in that, and I am also interested in sharing some memory tricks with folks at the DNC because no one can remember who paid 10 million dollars to a law firm to do oppo research. I find that stunning. $10 million and no one can remember who authorized it, who approved it. So you’ve got two issues, a memory issue and then the lack of transparency by laundering money through a law firm.”
things, sell 20 percent of our uranium supplies to
interests and donors aligned with Moscow:
It is against the law for the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a British spy and to Russian sources in order to obtain the infamous and discredited Trump “dossier.” The Federal Election Campaign Act (52 USC 30101) prohibits foreign nationals and governments from giving or receiving money in U.S. campaigns. It also prohibits the filing of false or misleading campaign reports to hide the true purpose of the money (52 USC 30121). This is what Clinton and the DNC appear to have done.
Most often the penalty for violating this law is a fine, but in egregious cases, like this one, criminal prosecutions have been sought and convictions obtained. In this sense, it could be said that Hillary Clinton is the one who was conspiring with the Russians by breaking campaign finance laws with impunity.
But that’s not all. Damning new evidence appears to show that Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband. Secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitness accounts allegedly show that Russian nuclear officials enriched the Clintons at the very time Hillary presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia.
Hillary Clinton was the godfather, or is it godmother, that ran multiple criminal enterprises. The existence of a special counsel investigating Trump-Russia collusion is based on a fake dossier she controlled the financing of. Paul Manafort and his co-defendants could make the “fruit of a poison tree” argument, that since the dossier that sparked the investigation into collusion and resulting indictments was politically motivated and financed, and its unverified contents may have been used by the FBI to obtain FISA warrants, anything that resulted from it should be summarily dismissed.
As for Marc Elias, the attorney for Perkins & Coie –t he DNC’s law firm -- who carried out the hiring of Fusion GPS, his involvement in legally and ethically dubious activity on behalf of the
Did DNC and Team Hillary attorney Marc Elias lead John Podesta and Debbie Wasserman Schultz into a perjury trap? According to CNN, the two testified to congressional investigators that they did not have any knowledge of the funding for the Fusion GPS dossier that prompted an FBI probe into Donald Trump campaign figures.
In recent closed-door interviews with the Senate intelligence committee, Podesta and Wasserman Schultz said they did not know who had funded Fusion GPS, the intelligence firm that hired British Intelligence Officer Christopher Steele to compile the dossier on Trump, the sources said.
Podesta was asked in his September interview whether the Clinton campaign had a contractual agreement with Fusion GPS, and he said he was not aware of one, according to one of the sources.
Sitting next to Podesta during the interview: his attorney Marc Elias, who worked for the law firm that hired Fusion GPS to continue research on Trump on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC, multiple sources said. Elias was only there in his capacity as Podesta’s attorney and not as a witness.
Whether or not this testimony was under oath, it is a crime to provide false testimony to Congress.
Indeed it is. Add it to the list of crimes that go uninvestigated and unprosecuted as AG Jeff Sessions contemplates his navel. A special counsel needs to be appointed and a grand jury empanelled to investigate this list of crimes that would make a mafia don proud. Justice should be blind and not brain-dead. If there is a double standard at play here, there is no equal justice under the law.
Daniel John Sobieski is a free lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Investor’s Business Daily, Human Events, Reason Magazine and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.
James O'Keefe of Project Veritas did a fine job of exposing the culture of anti-Trump bias behind the scenes at the New York Times, but the paper of record just...well, trumped him.
How?
On November 1, the Times ran a full-page incendiary ad calling for mass protests to end the "nightmare" of the "Trump/Pence regime" by joining in Antifa-style riots beginning on November 4. So the Times not only is anti-Trump, but stands in direct opposition to our Constitutional Republic and the rule of law – something not even Project Veritas uncovered.
Ask yourself: during the prior administration, would the Times have printed an ad by an extremist group on the right calling for protesters to "end the nightmare" and proclaiming that "the Obama-Biden regime must go"? And if it had printed such an ad, what do you think would have happened next?
By the way, just who exactly sees Trump's agenda to make America safe, strong, prosperous, and great again as a nightmare? Isn't this what everyone wants? On second thought, perhaps it's a nightmare to people who want America to be unsafe, weak, poor, and in the tank – i.e., people who hate this country and want to take it down.
And the ad isn't just about Trump. It reads: "The Trump/Pence regime must go!" Wait a minute. This isn't a third-world country where we have a dictatorship and can oust it only by force. If and when people are unhappy with our leaders, we vote them out of office. And in those extremely rare cases where a president is impeached or steps down for whatever reason, the vice president becomes the president. We don't simply let a riotous rabble kick them both out of office because these malcontents don't like their policies.
And yet we've heard no official response to the Times for running this ad.
Let's put this in perspective.
Recently, presumably under Special Counsel Robert Mueller's directive, federal agents stormed into Paul Manafort's home at 5:00 A.M., barging into the bedroom where he and his wife were sleeping. They ransacked the place, although Manafort had been cooperating with Mueller's investigation and had turned over whatever was requested. Manafort's alleged offense? Improperly filing foreign tax documents and possibly owing additional taxes from business dealings he had overseas a number of years before he joined the Trump campaign – and therefore seemingly of no relevance to Mueller's investigation into possible Russian collusion in the 2016 election.
Compare that to The New York Times, with its iconic reputation and millions of readers, printing a full-page ad paid for by the Soros-affiliated RefuseFascism group, calling for the overthrow of our legitimately elected president. And vice president. That would leave us with President Paul Ryan...
And yet, amazingly, I haven't heard a word about the feds storming the Times and arresting every editor who allowed that ad to end up in print.
That's sedition, folks. Last I heard, it was a serious felony – a kissing cousin of treason.
Apparently, it isn't politically correct to talk about
such high crimes. That may be the opinion of our
absentee attorney general, who has turned a blind
eye not only to this shocking ad, but also to
Hillary's potentially treasonous sellout of 20% of
America's uranium to the Russians, for a $145-
million payment to her, um, charitable foundation.
In fact, the whole mainstream media has been silent regarding the Times' seditious pamphleteering. However, Alex Jones on Infowars held up the ad on air, bringing it to his viewers' attention. You'll never guess what followed. The very next morning, a dozen or more publications, including Newsweek and Salon, accused him of making it up! They stated categorically that the New York Times ran no such ad.
This is twilight-zone stuff.
The ad is for real – you can view it in The New York Times digital version as well as in the November 1 print edition. Your library may have a copy – mine does – and the scandalous ad is there for all to see.
I suppose these other publications figured that most of their readers wouldn't bother to fact-check. Yet it is truly mind-bending that they all rushed to deny the reality and to discredit Alex Jones for exposing the very real and violence-inciting ad that the premier newspaper in the country displayed so prominently.
One more thing: Notice the use of the word "regime" in "The Trump/Pence regime must go!" Americans don't speak of presidential "regimes." That is Soros-speak. Remember that he's a regime changer – someone who prides himself on using his billions to topple regimes across the world, leaving millions of people in chaos and misery.
President Trump doesn't have a "regime"; he has an administration. And until he replaces one of the key office-holders of that administration – his attorney general – we can expect more unchecked lawlessness and more open calls for insurrection that our own press apparently sees fit to promote.
When Trump-supporters at his rallies chanted, "Lock her up!" – referring, of course to "Crooked Hillary" – many Democrats were incensed at what they regarded as sloganeering and poor taste. Now, with the latest revelations, they may well join the chorus.
Welcome to the party, Democrats. Better late
than never. Hillary tried to steal the election, but
ironically, she stole it from the Democrats. She
actually stole their money, their organization, and
their most politically savvy potential candidate,
Joe Biden, who might otherwise today be the
sitting president of the United States.
Hillary Clinton has become the J.R. Ewing of the Democratic Party. The fictional character on the hit TV series Dallas (1978-91), J.R. was the wealthy financial schemer who delighted in destroying his rivals and anyone else whom he randomly decided to ruin. Hillary Clinton is every bit the sociopathic,
Perhaps her followers will now take a retrospective look and conclude, How could we have been fooled? Or will they?
The sad fact is that many Democrats were not the least bit fooled. Just as "everyone knew" about Harvey Weinstein but said nothing, Democrats had long ago learned to avoid, at all costs, offending the Clintons, while pretending to like them. They sold their political souls to a devil, and they are paying the political price. Pray for them that they lose no more soul than that.
Someday, there will be a TV series about Hillary. An apt title for it would be The Left Wing.
Stay tuned, because this is not over yet.
It is rumored that the reason that the New York Times included the Weinstein scandal in its "news fit to print" category was to dry up his cash flow to the Clintons. Donna Brazile's book, Hacks, (referring to Hillary Clinton's subversive takeover of the Democratic Party), is a second major indication that the partisan machinery Hillary hijacked is beginning to catch her among its cogs and gears. If so, she may expect it to be as merciless as she is.
Hillary once openly declared that if she does in fact go to prison, "I won't be the only one." She will almost certainly drag down others with her, beginning with her closest accomplices and confidants.
If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and
unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to
see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary
Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.
In the meantime, let us momentarily join, arm in arm, with our Democrat enemies, and with one united voice, chant...
тнє мα∂ яєsιsтєг
same way about one as about the other. Somewhat glamorous, or at least familiar. People we enjoy. Sometimes, even people we admire or even trust.
Perhaps her followers will now take a retrospective look and conclude, How could we have been fooled? Or will they?
No comments:
Post a Comment