Wednesday, December 6, 2017

BANKSTER STEVE BANNON: 'A VOTE FOR DOUG JONES IS A VOTE FOR HILLARY CLINTON AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, OBAMA AMNESTY AND NO E-VERIFY



Steve Bannon: ‘A Vote for Doug Jones Is a Vote for the Clinton Agenda’



Breitbart News Executive Chairman and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon blasted Alabama Democratic candidate Doug Jones Tuesday as representing the globalist agenda pushed by failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“A vote for Doug Jones is a vote for the Clinton agenda,” Bannon told a crowd at a rally for Republican Judge Roy Moore.
Bannon spoke as, despite accusations of sexual impropriety, Moore has regained a solid lead in the polls a week away from election day. Bannon suggested that this was in part because of Jones’ inability to hide his hard-left agenda.
“Doug Jones is a citizen of Alabama and I respect that, but I can’t believe this brother is running in the state of Alabama with this record,” Bannon said. “It’s amazing, I mean, what planet are you on?”
Bannon noted Jones’ similarities to the failed agenda of the Hillary Clinton campaign — more associated with East Coast elites rather than the sensibilities of the deep South.
“Guns, abortion, immigration, trade – he’s a Clinton globalist,” Bannon said. “You wouldn’t know it by his campaign literature, because he’s trying to avoid all that, he’s trying to avoid 20-30 years of backing the Clinton agenda.”
However, Bannon also warned the citizens of Alabama that their vote has consequences and that it is not irrational to be angry about the state of the country as it has been governed by the establishment in the nation’s capital.
“It’s these policies of the Democratic Party and the globalist elite, supported by the Republicans that have helped to gut this country, and Doug Jones has been there every step of the way.”
Adam Shaw is a Breitbart News politics reporter based in New York. Follow Adam on Twitter: @AdamShawNY.


WATCH: Roy Moore Rally in Alabama Featuring Steve Bannon



GOP senatorial nominee Judge Roy Moore will host a rally Tuesday evening in Fairhope, Alabama, kicking off the final week of his campaign against Democratic nominee Doug Jones.

Breitbart News’ Executive Chairman and former White House Chief Strategist Stephen K. Bannon will join Moore, as well as political commentator Dr. Gina Loudon and other local speakers.
The rally will take place in Oak Hollow Farm off Greeno Road — in the same barn Moore rallied in alongside Bannon during the judge’s primary campaign against establishment-backed Senator Luther Strange.
The event is slated to begin at 7:00 p.m. ET (6:00 p.m. local) and can be watched here as well as on Breitbart News’ Facebook and YouTube pages.
According to Breitbart News’ Matthew Boyle, the rally is expected to draw an even bigger crowd than in September.
“[The rally] will feature both Judge Moore and Bannon making the case of the importance of this election–not just to the people of Alabama, but to the whole country, with the world watching,” Boyle reports.
“The people of Alabama know what is at stake in this Senate race,” Bannon told Breitbart News. “That’s why they’re standing with Judge Roy Moore.”
“They know that if we want to take our country back, we need to actually win elections, not throw in the towel at the first sign of trouble,” Bannon continued. “The Republican establishment in D.C. does not know how to win anything. Judge Roy Moore does. This Vietnam veteran knows how to stand up and fight and win. And as another winner who was dismissed by the establishment famously declared, ‘We’re going to start winning again!’”
Click here for latest Breitbart News’s latest headlines on Alabama’s special Senate election.
Amanda House is Breitbart News’ Deputy Political Editor. You can follow her on Twitter at @AmandaLeeHouse.

Immigration Group Files Lawsuit Against Gary, Ind.'s Sanctuary City Policy




By Michael W. Chapman | December 5, 2017 | 2:57 PM EST


(Screenshot, YouTube)
(CNSNews.com) -- The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI) and the Bopp Law Firm announced today that they have filed a lawsuit against the City of Gary, Ind., its mayor, and its Common Council members, charging that Gary's sanctuary city ordinance, which shelters illegal aliens, violates a state law that mandates cooperation with federal immigration laws.
The city operates under ordinance 1900, adopted in May 2017, which defines Gary as a "welcoming city," which means local law enforcement is forbidden from cooperating with federal immigration officials when it comes to illegal aliens. 
However, Indiana state law, Chapter 18.2, bans "what are commonly called sanctuary-city or welcoming-city ordinances," according to the lawsuit, which was filed Tuesday in Indiana's Lake County Circuit Court. The suit seeks to compel city officials to comply with Chapter 18.2.

(Screenshot, YouTube)
“By enacting ordinance 9100, the leaders of Gary have flagrantly violated Indiana’s law prohibiting sanctuary cities,” said Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI.
“In addition to defying state law, they are also endangering the safety of their constituents," said Wilcox. "As we saw in the Kate Steinle case, sanctuary city policies can result in tragic consequences. To allow this ordinance to stand would set a dangerous precedent in Indiana.”
"According to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement estimates, roughly 2.1 million criminal aliens are living in the U.S., over 1.9 million of which are removable," said the IRLI in a statement.
"These criminal aliens continue to live in communities and engage in further criminal activity when state and local law enforcement are prohibited from cooperating with federal immigration officials," said the IRLI.
"[T]he reality is that sanctuary cities present an existential threat to residents of those communities and all Americans," said Brian Lonergan, the IRLI director of communications, in a commentary in The Hill. "A permissive attitude toward illegal immigrants will only promote more illegal immigration, and all the undesirable consequences for education, social services, employment and national security that come with it."
The Washington Times reported in March that there are nearly 500 jurisdictions in the United States that are "sanctuary cities." 
To read the IRLI's lawsuit, click here.



Liberal Lingo: 'Sanctuary Cities'


A sanctuary is a place where people can go to be safe. Generally speaking we think of good people going to sanctuaries to escape evil; some Jews found sanctuary from the Holocaust in England and the United States, for example.
Liberals like to repurpose words with positive connotations, like sanctuary, in order to add a false impression of sanity to liberal positions which are otherwise indefensible.

In the case of the now ubiquitous “Sanctuary Cities” phrase, liberals hope to evoke Americans desire for fairness and our propensity to stick up for the little guy.
After all, even if you’re some coldhearted racist conservative, liberals reason, your heartstrings will be plucked by the idea of cruel ICE agents swooping in on a hard working “undocumented” family who pay their taxes, never take government aid, and work hard at jobs where they are underpaid because “gringo” bosses threaten to call ICE on them; jobs which no citizen would do.
Ignoring for a moment the prevalence, or lack thereof, of such illegals, and also ignoring the blacks who can’t find a job because “honest” illegals will work for less, the reality is that “Sanctuary Cities” have nothing to do with “honest” illegals.
The only people who get sanctuary in “Sanctuary Cities” are criminals. Cities and states can’t stop ICE from enforcing the law; laws supported by generations of Democrat politicians, by the way. They can’t provide safe haven for “honest” illegals; not that they need to since “honest” illegals are not that frequently targeted even by the “racist” Trump administration.
But what local governments can do is shield illegals who commit additional crimes in the US from being deported. “Sanctuary Cities” do so by preventing the police from notifying ICE when an illegal has been arrested for a crime. Historically the police would notify ICE, ICE would go to the police station and conduct a safe -- for the illegal and the community -- transfer to ICE so that the criminal could be deported.
In “Sanctuary Cities” illegals who drive drunk, for example, are simply allowed back into society without ICE having a chance to deport them.
That’s right; “Sanctuary Cities” exist to ensure that illegals who drive drunk or commit a wide range of other crimes don’t risk deportation. While the specific laws that illegals can break and be protected from deportation vary between different “Sanctuary Cities” they are not restricted to jaywalking, having a taillight out on their car, and littering. In fact, only if the offense is serious enough that the illegal is put in jail, at least temporarily, does the “Sanctuary City” policy have any role; if the illegal doesn’t go to jail the jail can’t notify ICE when he’s going to be released so that ICE can pick him up.
The net effect of “Sanctuary Cities” is to ensure that illegals who continue to commit other crimes are shielded from deportation; that’s right liberal politicians are working hard to increase the criminal population in “Sanctuary Cities.”
Haven’t you ever wished we could just throw drunk drivers out of your city so that they can’t kill people you may know the next time they slip up? Well, we can’t do that for citizens, including legal immigrants, but we can for those who sneak into our country. Yet the whole purpose of “Sanctuary Cities” is to ensure that criminals are allowed to stay in the country enabling them to commit more crimes.
Why would any sane person support such a thing?
Maybe it’s because liberals know that criminals are both likely to not be concerned about illegally voting and likely to vote for liberal candidates who work to make life easy for criminals -- so long as they don’t prey on the rich people the politicians schmooze with.
Or maybe it’s the liberals all or nothing approach to issues; either we let all illegals stay or we’re going to force all of them out. After all liberals staunchly defend the right of a woman to abort her viable, pain feeling, unborn daughter because she, or her spouse, wants a boy so extremism in the protection of violence is nothing new to liberals.
Or maybe it’s because illegals provide cheap labor for rich white liberals, and even criminal illegals rarely prey directly on the ruling elites whose safety and prosperity is the main concern of modern liberals.
In any case, “Sanctuary Cities” do nothing to help illegals whose only crime was breaking into our country. In fact, it wouldn’t be surprising if “Sanctuary Cites” were causing more suffering for the “honest” illegals.
The man who killed Kate Steinle, for example, doesn’t speak English. Given that it’s not absurd to think that illegals like him, with criminal records and minimal English skills, would tend to prey on “honest” illegals more than on American citizens. If that is the case, then by protecting illegals who continue to commit crimes “Sanctuary Cities” are hurting the “honest” illegals they claim to be trying to help, not to mention the legal Hispanic immigrants.
But words have power, so whenever and wherever you see, hear, or read the phrase “Sanctuary City” make sure you explain to anyone you can, in a polite way, that the real term should be “Sanctuary for Criminals Cities.”
It wouldn’t be shocking if most of the people who support “Sanctuary Cities” think that those cities protect “honest” illegals given the way the media covers the issue. Hence by shining a light into the swamp you might be able to get people who would normally vote for a liberal to realize that there’s a huge difference between mass deportation and deporting illegals who drive drunk.
You can read more of tom’s rants at his blog, Conversations about the obviousand feel free to follow him on Twitter


JOHN BINDER

CALIFORNIA MOVES CLOSER TO FINAL ANNEXATION BY MEXICO


DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP PER LA RAZA:

NO TEST, NO BACKGROUND CHECKS ON CRIMINALITY, NO BACK TAXES, NO FINES.... JUST JUMP STRAIGHT TO VOTING BOOTHS! AND VOTE OFTEN!!!

 

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/07/john-binder-californias-surrender-to.html

 

In 2013, California lawmakers passed legislation that allowed illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses if they can prove to the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) their identity and state residency. The plan was one of the largest victories to date by the open borders lobby.… JOHN BINDER – BREITBART.com



 TRUMP’S SECRET AMNESTY, WIDER OPEN BORDERS DOCTRINE TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.

"During the same month that Schlafly had backed Trump for 


his “America First”agenda, Nielsen’s committee 


released an ideologically-globalist report, promoting the 


European migrant crisis as a win for big business who 


would profit greatly  from a never-ending stream of cheap,


foreign migrants."


 

HOMELESS CRISIS IN LOS ANGELES, MEXICO’S SECOND LARGEST

 

CITY, WORSENS BY THE DAY….        Approximates the great depression

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/11/homeless-crisis-in-mexicos-second.html

 

 

93% of the murders in Los Angeles are by Mexicans



Trump promises Wall Street, the Plundering U.S. Chamber of Corporate Fascist, Mexico and voting illegals:



NO (real) WALL, NO E-VERIFY, CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT, OPEN BORDERS ADVOCATE TO HEAD DHS….

But isn’t that already the La Raza Supremacy Democrat’s agenda???


THE WAR ON AMERICA’S MIDDLE-CLASS waged by D.C., U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the La Raza Fascist Party and Mexico!
                                                                                                   

The Washington-imposed economic policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign labor and spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions. NEIL MUNRO

The Trump Secret Deal with Narcomex:

NO E-VERIFY, NO ENFORCEMENT, NO (real) WALL and NO LEGAL NEED APPLY to keep wages depressed….. but isn’t that the Democrat Party’s amnesty plan in a nutshell???


Swamp Keeper Trump is hiring 70 illegals at his Swamp Palace of Mar-a- Lago.

(Screenshot, YouTube)

No comments: