California used to be home to America's largest and most
affluent middle class. Today, it is America's poverty
capital. What went wrong? In a word: immigration.
SPENCER P. MORRISON
AMERICA: ONE PAYCHECK AND TWELVE
ILLEGALS AWAY FROM HOMELESSNESS!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/rick-moran-los-angeles-mexicos-second.html
A dashcam video of downtown Los Angeles on
Christmas day reveals a stunning sight: hundreds of tents and lean-tos on the
sidewalks that serve as shelter for the homeless. The scene is reminiscent of a
third-world country. RICK MORAN / AMERICANTHINKER
com
HOMELESS CRISIS IN LOS ANGELES,
MEXICO’S SECOND LARGEST
CITY, WORSENS BY THE DAY…. Approximates the great depression
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/11/homeless-crisis-in-mexicos-second.html
93% of the murders in Los Angeles are by
Mexicans
HOMELESS AMERICA’S HOUSING CRISIS as 40
million illegals have climbed U.S. open borders.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/homeless-in-america-hundreds-of.html
EVERY AMERICAN (Legal) only one paycheck and
two illegals away from living in their cars.
NANCY PELOSI, and her LA RAZA SISTERS, SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN,
FORMER SEN. BARBARA BOXER and NOW SEN. KAMALA HARRIS are a pantheon of
staggering self-serving corruption.
They and their families have all gotten filthy rich off of
these women’s elected office.
Their endless hispandering for the illegals’ votes has turned
California into Mexifornia, a drug, gang and anchor baby welfare third-world
dumpster!
“Liberal governing has
transformed beautiful California into the poverty
capital of America with the worst quality of life. Crazy
taxes,
crazy high cost of living, and crazy overreaching
regulations have crushed the middle class, forcing the middle class to
exit the Sunshine State. All that is left in California are illegals
feeding at the breast of the state, rapidly growing massive
homeless tent cities, and the mega-rich.” LLOYD MARCUS
LA City Council May Operate Tent Encampments for 34,000 Homeless
The Los Angeles City Council voted last week to develop an “emergency” plan that could operate trailer and tent encampments to house 34,000-homeless — similar to the plan developed by Orange County.
The Los Angeles City Council on March 23 declared a homeless crisis by requesting the Los Angeles County Homeless Services Authority implement an Emergency Response to Homelessness Plan that would provide an alternative to encampments for 100 percent of the Los Angeles homeless population by December 31, 2018.
The Los Angeles Housing Authority recently reported that of the 34,189 homeless identified in the 2017 federally mandated count, 25,237 or 76 percent, were unsheltered and living on sidewalks, cars, tents, or mobile homes.
The report was released 16 months after homeless advocates convinced city voters they could permanently solve homeless by passing Measure HHH ballot initiative, which raised property taxes by $9.64 per $100,000 of assessed valuation to fund a $1.2 billion bond.
Los Angeles County then convinced voters in March 2017 to pass Measure H to provide $350 million per year worth of homeless mental health and addiction services through a ¼ percent increased sales tax up to 10 percent in a number of L.A. County cities.
Both measures only achieved the 2/3 majority required to pass because of a miraculous surge from absentee voters in central and south LA districts that supported higher taxes.
LA City Council members also recently voted to build 222 units of permanent supportive homeless housing in each of the 15 LA City Council districts by 2020. The first 122 of the 3,330 approved homeless units broke ground in East Hollywood in November.
But the federal 2017 City of Los Angeles homeless count found the population had spiked by 5,698, or about 20 percent, since 2016. That means despite raising $1.2 billion in taxes, the net number of homeless after the new construction has already increased by 2,368.
Last month, the city council voted unanimously to start housing 60 homeless people in trailers on a city-owned downtown lot. But despite the city paying $2 million for trailers equipped with bathrooms and showers, and funding allocating another $1 million a year to operate the downtown trailer park, CBS News reported that local restaurant owners say transients already hurt their business, and the trailers will make the situation worse.
The City of Los Angeles told voters it could solve the homeless problem with the HHH tax increase and $1.2 billion. But it cost Orange County $780,000 per month temporarily to house 700 homeless evicted from the Santa Ana River in 400 motel rooms. Given the enormous scale of L.A.’s homeless problem, that would cost the city about $49.2 million a month.
Orange County Supervisors voted on March 19 to set up tent cities on county parcels next to public parks in Irvine, Huntington, and Laguna Niguel. All 3 cities are threatening to file lawsuits to prevent the Orange County from dumping its problem on local communities.
None of the 15 Los Angeles Districts wants the risk exposure to infectious diseases that come with a homeless encampment. Breitbart News reported that a hepatitis A outbreak began among San Diego’s homeless population and has spread statewide. The latest California Public Health report found 703 new cases, 460 hospitalizations, and 21 deaths.
Rising
Homelessness Among Working Californians… a state that employs millions using
stolen social security numbers and hands out tens of BILLIONS in social
services and welfare!
BE
HONEST! WHEN HAVE YOU EVER HEARD EVEN ONE OF THESE PRO-AMNESTY AND OPEN BORDERS
POLITICIANS EVEN MENTION THE TRAGEDY OF AMERICA’S MILLION HOMELESS LEGALS???
In California, the rising number of
homeless people are not who you may think they are. The Los Angeles
Times editorial board recently drove home that point by personalizing what
it means to be homeless in the United States' second-most populous city in
2018.
Many people think of homelessness as
a problem of substance abusers and mentally ill people, of chronic skid row
street-dwellers pushing shopping carts. But increasingly, the crisis in Los
Angeles today is about a less visible (but more numerous) group of
“economically homeless” people. These are people who have been driven onto the
streets or into shelters by hard times, bad luck and California’s irresponsible
failure to address its own housing needs.
Consider Nadia, whose story has
become typical. When she decided she had to end her abusive marriage, she knew
it would be hard to find an affordable place to live with her three young
children. With her husband, she had paid $2,000 a month for a three-bedroom
condo in the San Fernando Valley, but prices were rising rapidly, and now
two-bedroom apartments in the area were going for $2,400 — an impossible rent
for a single parent who worked part time at Magic Mountain.
Nadia
and her children are among the economically homeless — men, women and, often
enough, families, who find themselves without a place to live because of some
kind of setback or immediate crisis: a divorce, a short-term illness, a loss of
a job, an eviction. In many cities across the nation, these are not necessarily
problems that would plunge a person into homelessness. But here they can. Why?
Because of the shockingly high cost of housing in Los Angeles.
Perhaps the most important thing that
anyone should take away from Times' editors' take on Nadia's situation is that
she is functional adult who is more than capable of improving her lot. Later in
the editorial, the LA Times' editors disclose that she was able to get her
family into a homeless shelter and that she has been able to secure a full time
job doing data entry at an insurance company, where only a few of her
co-workers know of her homeless status.
Nadia is far from alone in Los Angeles.
Meanwhile, north of Los Angeles, Santa Barbara is one of the wealthiest
cities in California. There, the New Beginnings counseling center has made arrangements to
allow up to 150 Californians who are either living in their cars or in recreational vehiclesto
be able to park them overnight in the otherwise empty parking lots of local
churches and government offices.
The
clients can park after 7 p.m., but have to clear out as early as 6 a.m. The
benefit is that the vehicles are no longer parked on city streets, which riles
some residents and merchants. And because the lots are monitored by New
Beginnings, the clients, who all go through a screening process, can at least
feel safe while they sleep.
Santiago Geronimo
works in the kitchen of a high-end Santa Barbara restaurant and until recently,
he, his girlfriend and her son Luis lived in a two-bedroom apartment shared by four
adults and three kids. But the girlfriend, Luisa Ramirez, lost her retail clerk
job because of a back injury, and they've lived in a Ford Explorer since
September. Their new home is a church parking lot on the Goleta border.
There
is a common element among many of California's employed homeless, in that many
were living in apartments or houses until one of their household's members
experienced a job loss. Beyond that, many were employed with relatively good
incomes until they lost their jobs, where they soon found that their available
employment options were limited to low-paying jobs that weren't enough to pay
their rents or mortgages.
Then
the evictions came, and they became homeless. All across the state.
Steve Lopez, a LA Times columnist, asked a good question about why
California's working population doesn't move to where housing is cheaper:
You might ask why people of
lesser means don't head to less expensive areas than Santa Barbara — it's a
fair question, and I've written about people who eventually did make such a
move. In Santa Barbara, the answers I got were the same ones I've heard
elsewhere in coastal California. People hold open the option of leaving, but
many are connected to specific places by history, family and employment
connections, and they're not quite ready to give up on a turnaround, move to a
place they don't know, and start over from scratch.
Besides that, local
economies rely on those of lesser means, so where are they supposed to live?
"You know," said Phil, "there's a huge
Hispanic population that does all the damn work around here. Every restaurant
you go into, you can watch them slaving away. And they're taking care of
people's gardens and everything else, and they wind up with eight or 10 people
living in a one-bedroom place."
Until that doesn't work, as Santiago Geronimo found out.
The truth is that many Californians have tried to move to greener
pastures, as many have from California's economically-distressed Central
Valley, where that region's oil industry has yet to recover from
the decline of oil prices from July 2014 through February 2016. According to
Moody's, for every job lost in the oil and gas industry, an additional 3.43 jobs may be lost in
other sectors, creating a negative deficit that other, more strongly growing
sectors of the economy must be in overdrive to overcome, just to get to the
point where any positive economic growth may be recorded. California's Central
Valley lost thousands of oil and gas industry jobs
during the downturn, where some of the impact of those losses are also being
felt in other communities throughout
the state's interior.
In Bakersfield, in Kern County, where many of the state's oil and gas
industry jobs are centered, the city's homeless shelters were forced to turn away Californians
seeking shelter earlier this year because they ran out of space to accommodate
them during a short cold snap, when having to sleep outdoors became too
intolerable.
Some of the economically displaced from California's Central Valley have
migrated to where jobs are available in the state's thriving metropolises, such
as San Francisco and Los Angeles, where they've run into the same situation of
excessively high rents. Consequently, they've joined the ranks of the employed
homeless.
Others are fleeing the state
altogether, paradoxically seeking to escape the
"prosperity" of the state's coastal cities, with the housing shortage-driven soaring
rents and declining quality of life in
those cities becoming a primary motivation for
their flight.
All these things together would appear to have set California on a very
different course than the rest of the United States. At the very least, where
the trends for homelessness are concerned.
For his part, the state's governor, Jerry Brown, refused to declare the
state's homelessness crisis to be an emergency in 2016, which denied the
state's counties and cities any additional resources to combat homelessness.
The state's data for homeless in 2017 shows the results of that decision, where
at the national level, if not for California, the trend for homelessness in the
U.S. would have improved.
CUT
LA RAZA’S WELFARE AND FIND THE FUNDS TO BUILD THE WALL AGAINST THE LA RAZA
HEROIN CARTELS! http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/monica-showalter-cut-billions-in.html
Adios, Sanctuary La Raza
Welfare State of California
A fifth-generation Californian laments his
state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are
coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over
2.6 million. The Federation for American
Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government
services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and
criminal justice system costs.
California
Wants to Secede? Let's Help Them!
California
is a part of America. But it’s no longer American. It is a foreign state. It is
a fugitive state. The U.S. Constitution and the rule of law no longer apply in
California. Call it, “The People’s Socialist Republic of California.” It’s a
state without a country. But it’s certainly no longer American in any
way.
Liberals
in California want to secede. They are trying to put it on the ballot. They
call it “Calexit.” I say, “Glory Hallelujah." Let’s help make it
happen. I propose 63 million Trump voters join the team. Let's work 24/7 to
turn their dream into a reality!
Millions
of illegal aliens live in California; drive in California with official
state-issued drivers’ licenses; and of course, use those licenses to vote in
California. Millions. That’s precisely how Hillary won
California by over 4 million votes.
California
supports illegal aliens over legal, law-abiding American citizens. They support
illegals getting free college tuition, while children of native-born Americans
pay full fare. They support illegals over police and ICE. Many liberals in
California want to abolish ICE. They want no borders and no immigration
law.
The
Attorney General of California has warned any business owner who cooperates
with ICE will face prosecution by the state of California. You
heard correctly. California will put the business owner in prison, for
cooperating with federal law, to protect the criminal breaking the law.
The
Mayor of Oakland famously played Paul Revere to warn illegal felons “ICE is
coming. ICE is coming.” The Feds report over 800 felons evaded arrest because
of that stunt. How many legal, law-abiding, native-born Americans will be robbed,
raped, or murdered in the coming weeks because of that act of sedition?
A
California judge just sided with the ACLU and barred LA County from enforcing
gang restrictions that dramatically lowered crime. California has once again
sided with hoodlums and gang-bangers over the law-abiding taxpayers.
In
Oakland, a coffee shop prohibits employees from serving police, in order to
create a “safe space” for their customers. Californians hate and distrust
police more than illegal felons and thugs who speak no English and wear gang
tattoos. Really.
All of
this is sheer madness. But California has taken it to a whole new level.
Just
this week the California Senate appointed the first-ever illegal alien to an
official statewide post. Lizbeth Mateo, a 33-year old illegal
alien-turned-attorney, will serve on the official state committee that doles
out money to illegals attending college. In California, illegals now decide how
taxpayer money is spent.
President
Trump loves to brand (see "Crooked Hillary"). Let’s brand California.
It’s not a “Sanctuary State.” It’s a “Fugitive State.” It’s a place that
chooses to let felons and fugitives run free. It’s a place where the rights of
criminals are far more important than protecting legal, law-abiding American
citizens who pay taxes. We are the second class citizens in California.
Here’s
the way to fix the problem. Liberal Californians want to secede. I'm joining
the movement. How about you?
Conservatives
should beg California to secede. We should make it easy for them. We should
help pay for it. Pass the hat. Every conservative should chip in $20. I’ll
throw $1000 to get the ball rolling.
Just
think of elections. Without California, Trump and all future Republican
presidential candidates would win, without breaking a sweat. Without
California, we’d easily win the popular vote. And we'd win the electoral vote
by a landslide.
Next
think of Congress. California has 53 House seats. Democrats lead 39-14, for a
net gain of 25 seats. Send California packing and the GOP gains a 25 House seat
lead. We would dominate the House for decades to come.
And of
course, the GOP would gain an automatic two seats in the Senate through the
subtraction of California. As it stands now, those two U.S. Senate seats are
deep blue Democrat forever. But if California secedes a 51-49 GOP lead
instantly moves to 51-47.
If 63
million Trump voters just gave an average of $20 each to the "Calexit
movement" that’s over $1.2 billion dollars. That’s enough money to help
California secede, with enough left over as a down payment on building a wall…
with California.
Majorities Say
Government Does
Too Little for Older
People, the Poor and
the Middle Class
Partisan, age gaps in views of government help for
younger people
Majorities
of Americans say the federal government does not provide enough help for older people
(65%), poor people (62%) and the middle class (61%). By contrast, nearly
two-thirds (64%) say the government provides too much help for wealthy people.
The
national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted Jan. 10-15 among 1,503 adults,
finds that views on government help for the poor, the middle class and the
wealthy – as well as for older people – have changed little in recent years.
This is the first time this series has included a question about younger
people.
There are
partisan differences in views of government support for all groups included in
the survey. However, the gap is somewhat narrower in views of government help
for older people than for other groups. While 73% of Democrats and
Democratic-leaning independents say the federal government does not do enough
for older people, a smaller majority of Republicans (58%) say the same.
The
partisan gap is much wider in views of government help for younger people.
Nearly seven-in-ten Democrats (69%) say the federal government does not provide
enough help for younger people. Republicans are divided: Nearly equal shares
say the government does too little (29%) and too much (27%) for younger people,
while 36% say it provides about the right amount of help.
In
addition, there are sizable age differences in views of government help for
younger people – but not in how much the government does for older people. A
majority of those younger than 50 (58%) say the government does not do enough
for younger people, compared with 44% of those 50 and older. Nearly identical
shares of those under 50 (65%) and those 50 and older (66%) say the federal
government does not do enough for older people.
Views of government
help for poor, wealthy, middle class
The
partisan divide in views of government aid for the poor is wider than for other
groups. Fully 82% of Democrats say the federal government does not provide
enough help for poor people, compared with just 36% of Republicans. About as
many Republicans say the government does too much for the poor (33%) as say it
does too little; 27% say the help the government provides is about right.
Pew
Research Center’s recent report on the public’s political values found that
partisan differences in attitudes about aid to the poor and needy have widened
considerably over the past two decades. In that study, 71% of Democrats said
the government should do more to help the needy even if it meant going deeper
in debt, compared with 24% of Republicans.
Democrats
and Republicans also differ in their attitudes about the help the government
provides to wealthy people. A large majority of Democrats (77%) say the federal
government provides too much help to the wealthy. As with views about
government help to the poor, Republicans are divided. Nearly half of
Republicans (46%) say the federal government provides too much help for wealthy
people, 42% say it provides about the right amount, while 6% say it does not
provide enough help.
Partisan
differences in opinions about the federal government’s help for the middle
class are not as pronounced. Seven-in-ten Democrats say the government does not
provide enough help for the middle class, compared with about half of
Republicans (51%).
Republican
attitudes about government help to the poor, middle class and wealthy differ
significantly by family income. Democratic opinions vary much less across
income levels.
Nearly
half of Republicans with incomes under $40,000 (47%) say that the government
does not provide enough assistance for poor people. This is considerably higher
than those who make between $40,000 and $75,000 or $75,000 or more; only about
three-in-ten in these income brackets say that poor people do not receive
enough assistance (32% and 28%, respectively).
A similar
pattern is seen on opinions about government help for the middle class. A
majority (59%) of lower-income Republicans say the middle class does not
receive enough help. That compares with about half of Republicans with higher
family incomes.
And while
58% of Republicans with incomes of less than $40,000 say the government
provides too much help to wealthy people, only about four-in-ten (41%) of those
with incomes of $40,000 or more say the same.
Large
majorities of Democrats across income categories say the federal government
does not provide enough help for the poor and middle class, and that it
provides too much help for the wealthy.
Drug
Rehab Centers are Fueling Homeless Epidemic in California
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/12/19/drug-rehab-centers-are-fueling-homelessness-in-california/
Kevork
Djansezian/Getty Images
Drug rehabilitation or “rehab” centers are increasingly being seen
as a contributing factor in the homeless epidemic that has swept across
the Golden State.
“There’s
evidence to suggest a portion of the growth [of homelessness] in some Orange
County cities, and to a lesser degree in Los Angeles, can be attributed to the
rehab industry’s aggressive recruitment of addicts – and their lucrative
insurance payments – from around the country,” the Orange
County Register noted in a recent article.
The issue rests in the fact that the drug rehab centers’
business models actually wind up leaving addicts stranded on the streets. The
rehab model is also highly lucrative, bringing in hundreds of thousands to
millions of dollars per year.
Often, once a patient’s insurance money runs out, rehab homes
and facilities will kick him or her out on the street, which results in relapse
and, often, homelessness.
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, over 60
percent of people who receive drug rehabilitation will relapse. Many of
these individuals wind up homeless.
In
2015, Forbes reported:
The National
Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency estimates that over 23 million Americans (age 12 and older) are
addicted to alcohol and other drugs. According to the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), just under 11% (2.5
million)
received care at an addiction treatment facility in 2012. SAMHSA also estimates
that the market for addiction treatment is about $35 billion per year.
According to Los Angeles County’s annual homeless count, the
region’s homeless population has grown 23 percent since 2016. The study
also found that the number of homeless people in L.A. County whose last
residence was out of state increased by 21 percent.
The Register points out that in
Florida, there is a strong link between rehab and drug-treatment facilities and
homelessness, and particularly in Palm Beach County, where government
counts reportedly found a 73 percent increase over the past two years in the
number of homeless youth between the ages of 18 and 24.
“The (rehab
patients) are not going back home to the Northeast,” Palm Beach County State
Attorney Dave Aronberg, who leads the county’s Sober Home Task Force, told
the Register. “The
incentives are too great to remain here: the free rent, the free
transportation, the lifestyle. They’ve set up these individuals for failure.”
Adelle
Nazarian is a politics and national security reporter for Breitbart News.
Follow her on Facebook and Twitter.
CAN YOU EVEN BELIEVE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS
COUNTRY AS D.C. WORKS OUT TAX CUTS FOR THE
SUPER RICH AND DEREGULATES WALL STREET'S
BIGGEST PLUNDERING BANKSTERS.
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS ARE
HOMELESS AS RENTS SOAR.
WE CAN END THE HOMELESS AND HOUSING CRISIS BY
SENDING 40 MILLION LOOTING MEXICANS BACK OVER
THE OPEN BORDERS.
EVERY AMERICAN IS ONLY ONE PAYCHECK AND TWO
ILLEGALS AWAY FROM LIVING IN THEIR CAR!
HOMELESS CRISIS IN LOS ANGELES, MEXICO’S SECOND
LARGEST
CITY, WORSENS BY THE DAY….
Approximates the great depression
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/11/homeless-crisis-in-mexicos-second.html
Homeless man found
dead in donation bin in San Diego, California
By Kevin
Martinez
18 December 2017
A man was found dead in a bin used for
clothing donations in the City Heights neighborhood of San Diego, California
last Friday. Police were called to the scene around 7:15 a.m., a few blocks
away from the San Diego Police Department’s (SDPD) Multi-Cultural Community
Relations building.
Authorities say the man was in his 40s
and appeared to be homeless. Foul play was not suspected in his death and it is
unclear how long he was stuck in the bin before he died. The man may have been
trying to get warm clothing before he suffocated to death.
The man’s name has not been released,
but local news media spoke with a woman at the scene who say the man was a
friend of those who lived in a nearby homeless encampment.
The donation bin where the man was
discovered was marked “Clothing & Shoes” and was located in a shopping
center parking lot one block away from the San Diego Rescue Mission, a homeless
shelter.
The number of homeless deaths has
increased significantly over the last several years in the city. At least 117
homeless people died on the streets of San Diego last year, according to the
San Diego Rescue Mission. That number does not include those lost to the
Hepatitis A outbreak, which killed 20, mostly homeless individuals. The year
before there were 90 deaths on the streets of America’s “finest city,” and in
2014 there 56 deaths.
Some of last year’s casualties included
a 21-year-old who overdosed on heroin and a 62-year-old who died from an
accident that caused blunt force injuries to his head. Of the 117 deaths
listed, 26 were in their 60s.
San Diego has the fourth largest
homeless population in the United States, with an estimated 9,160 people
homeless on any given night, according to a report by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). Only New York City, Los Angeles County and
Seattle/ King County in Washington had larger homeless populations.
During a one-night count in January, the
number of homeless actually increased by 0.7 percent to 553,742 people over the
previous year. This marks the first year-over-year increase in the national
homeless population since 2010. In California, the number increased by 13.7
percent to 134,278, which means out of every 10,000 Californians, 34 are
homeless. In San Diego, the number increased by 5 percent.
Homelessness has largely increased due
to the lack of affordable housing and little or no government assistance to
prevent people from sliding into poverty. Especially on the West Coast, where
rent rises faster than the average paycheck, those who face the prospect of
losing shelter have little or no recourse than staying with friends or in
vehicles, or on the streets.
While nationwide, the number of homeless
living unsheltered in tents, cars and on the street is 35 percent, in San Diego
the number is 61.6 percent. Statewide, California has the highest rate of
unsheltered homeless in the US with 68.2 percent of the homeless population
unsheltered.
RVs Become Only Housing Option
for Many in Unaffordable San Francisco
Housing prices and the homeless epidemic in Northern California are two
factors that have contributed to what is being described as a “crisis” in which
trailers and recreational vehicles (RVs) have become the only viable option for
residents of the Bay Area.
“We’ve never
seen it like this,” Tom Myers, executive director of Community Services Agency
of Mountain View, told the San Jose Mercury News. “We have to be prepared
that this will be the new normal for us. It’s a crisis.” According to the
publication, San Francisco averages more than three complaints a day about RV
communities.
“I
have to do whatever I have to do,” Robert Ramirez, 54, who lives on lives on
government assistance and collecting recyclable items, told the Mercury News. He has been living
in his RV for six months. He is currently in San Jose but will likely be asked
to move in a short amount of time.
The
median cost of a two-bedroom apartment is approximately $2,500 in San Jose and
$2,200 in Oakland.
RV
residents, while they do not consider themselves homeless, are reportedly often
included in overall homeless counts. Since 2015, the number of homeless people
has jumped to nearly 40 percent.
The
stretch along South 7th Street in San Jose has become an RV haven for people
who cannot afford the city’s skyrocketing rents.
During
her annual State of the City address last month, Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf
called on her constituents to open their doors and residences to the city’s
homeless. “Give up that Airbnb. Fix up that back unit,” Schaff reportedly said.
In
2015, SF Weekly noted: “Although it’s illegal to
inhabit a vehicle in San Francisco between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m., police rarely
enforce that law.”
Adelle Nazarian is a politics and national security reporter for
Breitbart News. Follow her on Facebook and Twitter.
Drug Rehab Centers are Fueling Homeless
Epidemic in California
http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/12/19/drug-rehab-centers-are-fueling-homelessness-in-california/
by ADELLE NAZARIAN19 Dec 201732
Drug rehabilitation
or “rehab” centers are increasingly being seen as a contributing factor
in the homeless epidemic that has swept across the Golden State.
“There’s
evidence to suggest a portion of the growth [of homelessness] in some Orange
County cities, and to a lesser degree in Los Angeles, can be attributed to the
rehab industry’s aggressive recruitment of addicts – and their lucrative
insurance payments – from around the country,” the Orange County Register noted in a recent
article.
The
issue rests in the fact that the drug rehab centers’ business models actually
wind up leaving addicts stranded on the streets. The rehab model is also highly
lucrative, bringing in hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars per year.
Often,
once a patient’s insurance money runs out, rehab homes and facilities will kick
him or her out on the street, which results in relapse and, often,
homelessness.
According
to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, over 60 percent of people who
receive drug rehabilitation will relapse. Many of these individuals wind
up homeless.
In
2015, Forbes reported:
The
National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependency estimates that over 23 million Americans (age 12 and older) are addicted to alcohol and other
drugs. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA), just under 11% (2.5 million) received care at an
addiction treatment facility in 2012. SAMHSA also estimates that the market for
addiction treatment is about $35 billion per year.
According
to Los Angeles County’s annual homeless count, the region’s homeless population
has grown 23 percent since 2016. The study also found that the number of
homeless people in L.A. County whose last residence was out of state increased
by 21 percent.
The Register points out that in
Florida, there is a strong link between rehab and drug-treatment facilities and
homelessness, and particularly in Palm Beach County, where government
counts reportedly found a 73 percent increase over the past two years in the
number of homeless youth between the ages of 18 and 24.
“The
(rehab patients) are not going back home to the Northeast,” Palm Beach County
State Attorney Dave Aronberg, who leads the county’s Sober Home Task Force,
told the Register. “The incentives are
too great to remain here: the free rent, the free transportation, the
lifestyle. They’ve set up these individuals for failure.”
Adelle Nazarian is a politics and national security reporter for
Breitbart News. Follow her on Facebook and Twitter.
...... the
entire reason America's borders are wide open and employers are permitted to
hire illegals is to keep wages depressed!
"Shielding American workers from
foreign competition gave rise to the middle class which, in turn, created the
"American Dream."
"The US jobs report for November,
released Friday, provides
further evidence that the much vaunted economic “recovery”
in the United States has overwhelmingly benefited Wall
Street, whose stock bonanza is based above all on stagnant
wages and the destruction of working-class living standards."
JOE LEGAL v LA RAZA JOSE ILLEGAL
Here’s how it breaks down; will make you
want to be an illegal!
THE
DEVASTATING COST OF MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS
Will Trump’s Amnesty double these figures?
Wages remain mostly
stagnant despite unemployment hitting new lows
THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY'S VISION OF AMERICA:
DEATH OF THE GOP AND 49 MEXIFORNIAS!
Adios, Sanctuary
La Raza Welfare State of California
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs.
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs.
BLOG:
MANY DISPUTE CALIFORNIA’S EXPENDITURES FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN
MEXIFORNIA JUST AS THEY DISPUTE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS. APPROXIMATELY HALF THE
POPULATION OF CA IS NOW MEXICAN AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE LIKE
BUNNIES. THE $22 BILLION IS STATE EXPENDITURE ONLY. COUNTIES PAY OUT MORE WITH
LOS ANGELES COUNTY LEADING AT OVER A BILLION DOLLARS PAID OUT YEARLY TO
MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. NOW MULTIPLY THAT BY THE NUMBER OF COUNTIES IN
CA AND YOU START TO GET AN IDEA OF THE STAGGERING WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE ERECTED SANS ANY LEGALS VOTES. ADD TO THIS THE FREE
ENTERPRISE HOSPITAL AND CLINIC COST FOR LA RAZA’S “FREE” MEDICAL WHICH IS
ESTIMATED TO BE ABOUT $1.5 BILLION PER YEAR.
Liberals
claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true.
It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute
only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6
billion, or at least $1,800 per household.
Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
"If the racist "Sensenbrenner
Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil
disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with
the immigrant civil rights and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements
to enable us to either form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming
of the existing Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and
that is to elect our own governors of all the states within Aztlan."
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.
If Immigration Creates
Wealth, Why Is California America's Poverty Capital?
California used to be home to America's
largest and most affluent middle class. Today, it is
America's poverty capital. What went
wrong? In a word: immigration. According to the
U.S. Census Bureau'...: The
Golden State is peddling fool's gold lately.
California used to be
home to America's largest and most affluent middle class. Today, it
is America's poverty capital. What went wrong? In a
word: immigration.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau's Official Poverty Measure, California's poverty rate hovers
around 15 percent. But this figure is misleading: the Census Bureau
measures poverty relative to a uniform national standard, which doesn't account
for differences in living costs between states – the cost of taxes, housing,
and health care are higher in California than in Oklahoma, for
example. Accounting for these differences reveals that California's real poverty rate is
20.6 percent –
the highest in America, and nearly twice the national average of 12.7
percent.
Likewise, income inequality in California is
the second-highest in America, behind only New York. In fact, if California
were an independent country, it would be the 17th most unequal country on Earth,
nestled comfortably between Honduras and Guatemala. Mexico is
slightly more egalitarian. California is far more unequal than the
"social democracies" it emulates: Canada is the 111th most
unequal nation, while Norway is far down the list at number 153 (out of 176
countries). In terms of income inequality, California has more in
common with banana republics than other "social democracies."
More Government, More Poverty
High taxes, excessive regulations,
and a lavish welfare state – these are the standard explanations for
California's poverty epidemic. They have some merit. For
example, California has both the highest personal income tax rate and the
highest sales tax in America, according to Politifact.
Not only are California's taxes high,
but successive "progressive" governments have swamped the state in a
sea of red tape. Onerous regulations cripple small businesses and
retard economic growth. Kerry Jackson, a fellow with the Pacific
Research Institute, gives a few specific examples of how excessive government
regulation hurts California's poor. He writes in a recent op-ed for
the Los Angeles Times:
Extensive environmental regulations
aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions make energy more expensive, also
hurting the poor. By some estimates, California energy costs are as
much as 50% higher than the national average. Jonathan A. Lesser of
Continental Economics ... found that "in 2012, nearly 1 million California
households faced ... energy expenditures exceeding 10% of household income."
Some government regulation is
necessary and desirable, but most of California's is not. There is
virtue in governing with a "light touch."
Finally, California's welfare state
is, perhaps paradoxically, a source of poverty in the
state. The Orange Country Register reports that California's
social safety net is comparable in scale to those found in Europe:
In California a mother
with two children under the age of 5 who participates in these major welfare
programs – Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (food stamps), housing assistance, home energy assistance,
Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children – would
receive a benefits package worth $30,828 per year.
... [Similar] benefits
in Europe ranged from $38,588 per year in Denmark to just $1,112 in
Romania. The California benefits package is higher than in
well-known welfare states as France ($17,324), Germany ($23,257) and even
Sweden ($22,111).
Although welfare states ideally help
the poor, reality is messy. There are three main problems with the
welfare state. First, it incentivizes poverty by rewardingthe
poor with government handouts that are often far more valuable than a
job. This can be ameliorated to some degree by imposing work
requirements on welfare recipients, but in practice, such requirements are
rarely imposed. Second, welfare states are expensive. This means higher taxes and therefore slower economic
growth and fewer job opportunities for everyone – including the poor.
Finally, welfare states are magnets
for the poor. Whether through domestic migration or foreign
immigration, poor people flock to places with generous welfare
states. This is logical from the immigrant's perspective, but it
makes little sense from the taxpayer's. This fact is why socialism
and open borders arefundamentally incompatible.
Why Big Government?
Since 1960, California's population exploded from 15.9 to 39 million
people. The growth was almost entirely due to immigration – many
people came from other states, but the majority came from
abroad. The Public Policy Institute of California estimates that 10 million
immigrants currently reside in California. This works out to 26
percent of the state's population.
BLOG: COME TO
MEXIFORNIA! HALF OF LOS ANGELES 15 MILLION ARE ILLEGALS!
This figure includes
2.4 million illegal aliens, although a recent study from Yale University suggests that the
true number of aliens is at least double that. Modifying the initial figure implies that
nearly one in three Californians is an immigrant. This
is not to disparage California's immigrant population, but it is madness to
deny that such a large influx of people has changed California's society and
economy.
Importantly, immigrants vote
Democrat by a ratio higher than 2:1, according to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies. In California,
immigration has increased the pool of likely Democrat voters by nearly 5
million people, compared to just 2.4 million additional likely Republican
voters. Not only does this almost guarantee Democratic victories,
but it also shifts California's political midpoint to the left. This
means that to remain competitive in elections, the Republicans must abandon
or soften many conservative positions so as to cater to the center.
California became a
Democratic stronghold not because Californians became socialists, but because
millions of socialists moved there. Immigration turned California
blue, and immigration is ultimately to blame for California's high poverty
level.
March 23, 2018
Is California Governor
Jerry Brown Mentally Ill?
Leftists are relentlessly
selling their bogus narrative that Trump is insane. Here are samples
of leftists' headlines: "Lawmakers Met With Psychiatrist About Trump's
Mental Health," "President Trump's Mental State An 'Enormous Present
Danger,'" "The Awkward Debate Around Trump's Mental Fitness,"
"The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists Assess."
So what has Trump done to
convince leftists that he must be crazy? Unlike Republicans, Trump
fearlessly confronts fake news media, calling them out when they
lie. Unlike Obama's punish-evil-America-first presidency, Trump has
America's best interest at heart. Unlike leftists seeking to
dissolve our borders, Trump plans to build a wall to protect our people and our
economy. Insanely, leftists cheered when Obama allowed
Ebola into America, claiming it was racist and unfair for Americans not to be
subjected to the disease. Unlike Obama, Hillary, Democrats, and fake
news media's war on Christianity (forcing a 100-year-old order of Catholic
nuns to fund contraception and forcing Christian businesses to service
same-sex ceremonies), Trump vows to defend religious liberty.
So I guess, according to
leftists' perverse way of thinking, that Trump must be crazy, along with the 63
million Americans who voted for him.
Governor Brown signed a
new law making California a sanctuary state, doubling down on his bizarre quest
to undermine American citizens. In essence, Brown gave federal law,
President Trump, and legal California residents his middle
finger. Numerous California families have suffered devastating
losses of family members killed by illegals with long felony records who have
been deported several times and welcomed back with open arms by
Brown. One mom whose son was killed by an illegal with two DUIs and
two felonies said Brown should be arrested for treason. Isn't it
reasonable to question Brown's sanity?
Liberal governing has
transformed beautiful California into the poverty
capital of America with the worst quality of life. Crazy
taxes,
crazy high cost of living, and crazy overreaching
regulations have crushed the middle class, forcing the middle class to
exit the Sunshine State. All that is left in California are illegals
feeding at the breast of the state, rapidly growing massive
homeless tent cities, and the mega-rich. Would a sane governor take pride
in causing this to happen to his state?
Headline: "San
Francisco Is A Literal [s-]hole, Public Defecation Map Reveals." Can
you imagine homeless people pooping on the streets being so pervasive that an
interactive map was created to help citizens avoid the piles of
poop? Human feces carries infectious
diseases. What
kind of irrational logic deems posing such health risks to constituents an act
of compassion? Is Governor Brown crazy?
Insanely, three fourths
of California's taxpayer dollars – more than $30 billion – is spent on
illegal aliens. Meanwhile, despite the highest taxes in the nation,
California is $1.3 trillion in debt – unemployment is at a staggering
11%. California's wacko giveaways to illegals include in-state
tuition, amounting to $25 million of financial aid. Nearly a million
illegals have California driver's licenses. L.A. County has 144%
more registered voters than there are residents of legal voting
age. Clearly, illegals are illegally
voting.
Get this, folks:
Americans are spending almost a billion dollars a year on auto insurance for
illegals. Brown is gifting illegals billions in welfare and housing
while his constituents cannot find a place to live.
Ten years ago, a buddy of
mine excitedly moved his family from Maryland to California to accept the
highest-paying job of his career. Despite his lucrative salary, he
was forced to move back east due to the outrageously high cost of
living. My buddy said if he were an illegal, practically everything
would be free. His story inspired me to write and record a Beach Boys-style
song titled "Can't Afford the Sunshine."
Once again, I ask you,
folks: would a rational governor do what Brown is doing to his
constituents? Is Governor Jerry Brown mentally ill?
Laura Ingraham: ‘California Is Almost Acting Like It’s a Separate Country’
Earlier this
week on Fox News Channel’s “The Ingraham Angle,” host Laura Ingraham slammed
California and its leaders for its sanctuary city policies and its open
defiance of the federal government seeking to uphold existing immigration law.
Transcript
as follows:
INGRAHAM: The radical takeover of California, that’s the focus
of tonight’s ANGLE.
I still remember the first time I traveled to Southern
California, it was the summer of 1984 and Los Angeles is hosting the Olympics.
Reagan was president and Republican George (inaudible) was the state’s
governor. Now, he was a moderate conservative, a law and order kind of guy.
The whole place, to me at least, felt like a Beach Boy song, the
weather, the people, the lifestyle was all, you know, beautiful stuff. But
today, the sunshine not with understanding, California is a very different
place. It’s now a place where state officials actively thwart federal
authorities trying to stop violent criminal offenders.
Oakland’s mayor, Libby Schaaf, went so far as to issue a warning
to immigrant communities that an ICE raid was forthcoming. Well, the president
sounded off on that today.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: What the mayor of
Oakland did the other day was a disgrace where they had close to 1,000 people
ready to be gotten, ready to be taken off the streets. Many of them, they say
85 percent of them were criminals and had criminal records, and the mayor of
Oakland went out and she went out and warned them all, scatter.
So instead of taking in a thousand, they took in a fraction of
that. She said get out of here. She is telling that to criminals and it’s
certainly something that we are looking at with respect to her individually.
What she did is incredible and very dangerous from the standpoint of ICE and
Border Patrol, very dangerous. She really made law enforcement much more
dangerous.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
INGRAHAM: Now, for her part, Mayor Schaaf is deflecting that
criticism and she is going straight to the r-word.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
MAYOR LIBBY SCHAAF, OAKLAND: The attorney general is trying to
distract the American people from a failed immigration system by painting a
racist, broad brush of our immigrant community as dangerous criminals.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
INGRAHAM: Now who is mentioning skin color or ethnicity or where
people are from. That’s just pathetic. California, the way you see this playing
out, is almost acting like it’s a separate country all together, not a separate
state. Well, I think Attorney General Jeff Sessions was 100 percent correct
yesterday when he labeled state officials radical extremists for perpetuating
the lawlessness.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JFFF SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL: Federal law determines
immigration policy. State of California is not entitled to block that activity.
Somebody needs to stand up and say no, you’ve gone too far. You cannot do this.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
INGRAHAM: But California AG Javier Becerra shot back. He argued
that the state sanctuary laws are constitutional adding our folks are very busy
doing public safety around the state. We don’t have to do the immigration work
for immigration officials. Excuse me. Public safety?
Well, that’s what we are supposed to believe when your own
Oakland mayor warned the illegal aliens ahead of time when she got wind of the
ice raid that was about to happen? Today, the White House released a partial
list of the crimes committed set free despite the lawful request of immigration
authorities. Check it out.
There is a Guatemalan citizen who was arrested last august for
injuring his spouse. While the Sonoma County jail provided ice with a whopping
24 minutes in the before it released the alien. A few weeks later, the Santa
Rosa Police Department in California arrested that same individual as a suspect
in the murder of his girlfriend.
Another Guatemalan, an alleged gang member was arrested by the
San Francisco police more than 10 times between 2013 and 2017 for charges
including rape, domestic battery, second degree robbery, assault, vehicle
theft, and on each occasion, what happened was ice requested notification of
his release so then ice could take him into custody.
Each time ICE’s request was declined by California. And then a
citizen of Mexico was arrested by Santa Clara County for drug possession on
January 11th, 2017. He was later convicted of child cruelty, felony possession
purchase of controlled substances and, of course, possession of marijuana. He
was released from local custody.
The list goes on and on. And we could literally do an entire
show just on the myriad ways that California sanctuary policies have endangered
the lives of innocent, law abiding citizens. And, of course, law enforcement
and, of course, legal immigrants.
California AG Becerra and Governor Moon Beam Brown are living in
alternative universe. They deny that they even have sanctuary laws in place.
Yet, here’s what their new statutes stipulate. In violation of federal
statutes, local officials cannot tell the feds when illegals in custody are
about to be released.
And they are banned under this law from transferring criminal
immigrants to federal officials. Now, we are talking about undocumented
criminals here. And the state of California is also so concerned about the
welfare of the illegal immigrants, that they imposed a state-run inspection of
immigrants detained by the federal government.
So, basically, they are trying to regulate federal immigration
detention and, perhaps most outrageously, one California law now requires
private business owners to — they can’t voluntarily cooperate with ICE agents.
Now, in fact, they have to notify illegal employees before any workplace
inspections take place or those private business owners face heavy fines.
Now, you cannot get more radical and rapidly open borders than
that. Though California officials are triggered over the sessions’ lawsuit, it
may be, may be the beginning of restoring some sanity to this state.
Republicans, let’s face it, largely have been shut out of
California politics now for years u and we are a very long way from the days
when Pete Wilson was governor back in the 1990s. Permissive liberal social
welfare policies and the embrace of illegal immigrants have plunged the state
into a spiral of homelessness.
It’s now at a crisis point declared by San Francisco and Los
Angeles and even Orange County. We reported on this before is grappling with
homeless encampments and the crime and health issues that come along with them.
This is not what the people of California want. How do I know that?
Well, a UC Berkeley poll just found that 74 percent of
Californians wanted to end sanctuary cities including 55 percent of Hispanics,
and 73 percent of Democrats. Now, if that’s not a cry for sanity or a cry for
help, I do not know what is.
Sessions and the Trump administration are throwing the golden
state a lifeline with these sanctuary lawsuits because if they’re successful,
perhaps the good vibrations, political and otherwise, can roll through
California once again. And that’s THE ANGLE.
( CALIFORNIA - BELOW IS LINK
TO ABOVE AND ADIOS – HOMELESS)
MEXIFORNIA: WHERE LA RAZA AND THEIR CARTELS
LOOT FIRST!
CALIFORNIA…. LAND OF POVERTY, WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY
BREEDERS and MEXICANS WHO JUMPED THE BORDERS TO VOTE FOR MORE!
California became a Democratic stronghold not because Californians
became socialists, but because millions of socialists moved
there. Immigration turned California blue, and immigration is
ultimately to blame for California's high poverty level.
California used to be home to America's largest and most affluent middle class. Today, it is America's poverty capital. What went wrong? In a word: immigration. SPENCER P. MORRISON
California used to be home to America's largest and most affluent middle class. Today, it is America's poverty capital. What went wrong? In a word: immigration. SPENCER P. MORRISON
*
No comments:
Post a Comment