Understanding LA RAZA / UNDIOSus: The U.S. tax
dollar funded Mexican fascist party which is the fastest growing political
party in America
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/michelle-malkin-understanding-us-funded.html
MEXICO WILL ELECT ALL FUTURE AMERICAN PRESIDENTS… Now go and watch the pols hispander!
If the
illegals are violent criminals, de Leon, governor Jerry Brown and attorney
general Xavier Becerra believe they are still better people and protect them
from deportation. And this fall one million illegals could be voting in California alone.
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATS' VOTING SCAM
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/270524/california-democrats-voting-scam-lloyd-billingsley
The Golden State does favors for illegal immigrants -- who may return
the favor at the voting booth.
June 22, 2018
“The
California state budget on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk puts tens of millions of
dollars into programs that could help undocumented immigrants fight federal
efforts to deport them,” the Sacramento Bee reports, “including opening up
$10 million to hire lawyers for unaccompanied minors trying to stay in the U.S.”
For that crowd, the Democrats’ $200 billion budget has even more to give.
The
budget “expands funding for immigration legal services offered through the
Department of Social Services and public colleges,” and “includes $1.6 million
to build a team of eight attorneys and investigators in the Labor
Commissioner's office at the Department of Industrial Relations.” This team
will enforce AB 430, “a state law that requires businesses to tell their
employees when they’re contacted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.” As
the report notes, “employers face penalties of $2,000 to $10,000 if they fail
to notify their workers of a pending immigration action.”
Last
year’s budget “put $45 million into providing legal services to immigrants,”
which the Department of Social Services deploys to “hire nonprofit
organizations that will work on immigration cases.” The new funding “steers
some of that money directly to colleges. It gives $10 million to community
colleges for immigration legal services, $7 million to the California State
University system and $4 million to the University of California.” Still, it’s
not done.
“The
upcoming budget also more than triples legal funding for undocumented minors,”
The Bee reports. “Last year, the Department of Social
Services received $3 million for those cases. In the next budget, the
department gets $10 million to help young undocumented immigrants.”
David
Chiu, the San Francisco Democrat who wrote AB 430, explains that “Donald
Trump’s out-of-control deportation force is constant threat to our immigrant
communities.” While Trump Derangement Syndrome is doubtless a factor, taxpayers
might consider the upcoming mid-term elections.
As
the Los Angeles Times reported in 2015,
California’s 2015 voter registration law “is intended to streamline the process
of signing up to vote and encourage more participation in elections.” It
kicks in “when people go to the DMV to obtain or renew a driver's license.”
Politicians deny that anybody will be automatically registered to vote.
“We’ve
built the protocols and the firewalls to not register people that aren’t
eligible,” secretary of state Alex Padilla told the Times. “At
the latest, for the 2018 election cycle, I expect millions of new voters on the
rolls in the state of California.” He got them.
According
to the DMV, as of March 2018, more than one million undocumented immigrants have
received driver’s licenses. Did any vote in the 2016 presidential
election?
California
Senator Dianne Feinstein denies that widespread voter fraud occurs and Alex
Padilla refuses to release data from voter rolls. So legal residents and
taxpayers have good reason to wonder what he is hiding.
State
legislators who take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution now reward the
violation of immigration law, and punish those who approve and follow federal
law. The largesse for illegals also violates state law, the 1996 Proposition
209, which bars ethnic preferences in state education, employment and
contracting.
California
state universities privilege illegals with in-state tuition and as the budget
shows, even pay their legal bills. Neither would apply to a legal African
American or Asian American student from Michigan or Nevada. Senate boss Kevin
de Leon also violated state law by giving preference to Mexican national Lizbeth Mateo, or whatever her real
name is, for a post on the California Student Opportunity and Access Program
Project Grant Advisory Committee.
So California violates
state law, defies federal law and budgets tens of millions of dollars for
millions of illegals, the vast majority Mexican nationals. They get protection
from the federal government, preference in education, and even payment of their
legal bills. In return, they vote for California Democrats, in the style of
Mexicans who vote for the dominant Partido Revolucionario
Institucional (PRI) party in return for favors.
In
effect, California Democrats are a branch of the PRI and form a Mexican
occupational government (MOGO) serving the interests of false-documented
Mexican nationals.
Assembly
speaker Anthony Rendon wants the state to “step up and work with Mexico” instead of the U.S.
federal government. Normally those who represent the interests of foreign
governments are required to register as agents of those governments.
Meanwhile,
California has given driver’s licenses to more than one million illegals. The
federal government should verify how many of that group show up to vote this
fall. As a
State Department investigation confirms, false documented illegals do vote repeatedly in federal,
state, and local elections. Illegal voting is a serious crime and so is
human trafficking.
The
false-documented “unaccompanied minors” who get $10 million in the budget are
those whose parents chose to break up their own families and put their own
children into the hands of criminal smugglers. California’s MOGO regime is okay
with that and even rewards it.
Back
in 1987, governor George Deukmejian returned $1.1 billion directly
to the people “to protect this money for the taxpayers.”
California now has a budget surplus of $9 billion but governor Jerry
Brown returns nothing to the people and ignores crumbling infrastructure and
fathomless pension debt. The three-time presidential loser would rather spend
taxpayers’ money to protect people who aren’t supposed to be here.
I.R.S.
ILLEGALS STOLEN 1.3 MILLION IDENTITIES!
THEY
STEAL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS TO STEAL JOBS, DRIVE ILLEGALLY, CONTRACT IN THE
TRADES ILLEGALLY, AND VOTE FOR MORE ILLEGALLY and do it by invitation of the
Democrat Party!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/irs-documets-13-million-identity-thefts.html
Mexicans cheat,
distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, STEAL and kill as if it’s a normal
way of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically
opposed to America’s culture. FROSTY WOOLDRIDGE
''California is going to be a Hispanic state,"
said Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it
should leave."
(THIS IS DATED. MEXICO NOW HAS INVADED ALL STATES )
And M.E.Ch.A's goal is even more radical: an
independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this organization gives to the seven states of the U.S.
Southwest – Arizona, California,
Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah."
The letter notes that the percentage in L.A.
County may be as high as 144%.
JUDICIAL
WATCH:
ILLEGALS
VOTING IN MASSIVE NUMBERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA
‘Eleven of California’s 58 counties have
registration rates exceeding 100% of the age-eligible
citizenry.’
‘California has the highest rate of inactive
registrations of any state in the country. Los Angeles County has the highest
number of inactive registrations of any single county in the country’
Judicial
Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens
Justin Sullivan / Getty
Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a
letter to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The
letter reads, in part:
NVRA
Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so as to
maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting federal
elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA to protect
the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of ineligible voters
to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the electoral process and
undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of elections.
…
As
the top election official in California, it is your responsibility under
federal law to coordinate California’s statewide effort to conduct a program
that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.
Judicial
Watch lays out the specifics:
“[T]here were
more total registered voters
than
there were adults over the age of 18
living
in each of the following eleven (11)
counties:
Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%),
Los
Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San
Diego
(138%), San Francisco (114%), San
Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano
(111%),
Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).”
The
letter notes that the percentage in L.A.
Country may
be as high as 144%.
The
letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does not
remove from the rolls “persons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal conviction,
and to remove noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.”
It
gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correct alleged violations
of the law.
Padilla
has been one of the main voices in opposition to President Donald
Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, refusing
to share voter data with it on the argument that doing so would
“legitimize false claims of massive election cheating last fall.”
President
Trump has claimed that he would have won the popular vote in the 2016
presidential election if not for illegal voting, and his administration
has singled
out California as a possible contributor to that margin.
The
Election Integrity Project is a California-based volunteer organization
that monitors voting irregularities.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was
named one of the “most
influential” people in news media in 2016.
He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, is available from Regnery.
Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
August 5, 2017
So addicts must show photo IDs to get
off drugs, but not to vote?
The homeless,
downtrodden, and poor who show up at drug detox centers all must show photo
identification to get treatment. It's done to prevent them from going to
more than one center for whatever maintenance fix they may be receiving at the
first center. It is obvious that the
government knows everyone has the capability to get a photo ID, so why do so
many Democrats block that requirement when it comes to voting? They use the false
arguments of voter intimidation while dismissing the real issue that maintaining
a fair election is extremely important to maintaining our freedoms.
These are the same
Democrats (and their media allies) who are complaining that Russia supposedly
interfered in our election process. Yet they do everything they can to
block commonsense photo ID requirements that the majority of the public
supports to ensure fair elections. They call people racists who support
these laws. The fact that they fight these photo ID requirements shows
they really don't care about the integrity of the voting process.
The ID requirements at
drug treatment facilities are intended to prevent people from enrolling in
multiple programs and selling opioid medication such as methadone on the black market, said a spokesman from
the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, adding
that programs would be liable for misuse of the medications.
Some detox centers will
admit a person without ID first and make time later to sort out the person's
identity, but doing so comes at risk of running afoul of federal and state
regulations on dispensing medications, experts said.
The government requires
the poor and elderly to have a photo ID to get food stamps, to open a bank
account, to get welfare, to get Medicaid, and to get Social Security among many
other things. Yet..
Democrats will go to
court to stop a state requiring people to get a photo ID to vote, using the
argument that it is racist. The fact that they require photo IDs for so
many other things the poor and minorities have to do shows what a crock that
argument is.
The only reason to block the photo ID laws for voting is to
open up voting to fraud.
Who will influence
the 2018 elections more: Russia or Mexico?
By Ed Straker
Exactly how many votes is Russia
alleged to have cast in the 2016 elections? I believe that the
number is zero.
Exactly how many votes have citizens
of Mexico and Central America cast in the 2016 elections? We don't
know the exact number, but we know that it is much
more than zero.
A 2014
study in the online Electoral Studies Journal shows that in the
2008 and 2010 elections, illegal immigrant [sic; should be
"aliens" –ed.] votes were in fact quite high.
"We find that some noncitizens
participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large
enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College
votes, and congressional elections," wrote Jesse T. Richman [and] Gulshan
A. Chattha, both of Old Dominion University, and David C. Earnest of George
Mason University.
More specifically, they write,
"Noncitizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote
needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other
Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress."
Specifically, the authors say that illegals may have cast as many as 2.8
million votes in 2008 and 2010. That's a lot of votes. And when you
consider [that] the population of illegal inhabitants has only grown since
then, it's not unreasonable to suppose that their vote has, too.
So why is Russia getting all the
attention? Russia, at worst, operated a small-scale propaganda
campaign on places like Twitter and Facebook before the
election. The amount of propaganda it disseminated was far, far less
than 1% of the liberal propaganda put out daily by The New York Times, The
Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and many others who said Trump is a
racist, Trump hates women, Trump hates poor people, etc. So Russian
"interference" was basically negligible.
Yet you wouldn't know that from
reading the headlines.
Russia is using fake accounts on
social media – many of them bots – to spread disinformation, the officials
said. European elections are being targeted, too, and the attacks
were not likely to end this year, they warned.
"We expect Russia to continue
using propaganda, social media, false-flag personas, sympathetic
spokespeople[,] and other means of influence to try to exacerbate social and
political fissures in the United States," Dan Coats, the director of
national intelligence, told the Senate Intelligence Committee at its annual
hearing on worldwide threats.
Oh, no – bots are spreading
disinformation! Let me know when these bots produce 1% of the
disinformation produced by The New York Times on a daily basis.
Trump initially tried
to investigate real interference in our elections. He set up a
commission to investigate voter fraud chaired by Kansas secretary of state Kris
Kobach. But when the liberal media cried that the commission was all
about voter suppression, Trump
folded like a cheap umbrella. He shut down the commission before
it could complete its research into what is probably massive voter fraud on the
part of Mexican and other foreign nationals.
And so Republicans have accepted
Democratic talking points. They talk only about Russian
"interference" and are so cowed that they won't talk about illegal
aliens voting. That's why we hear only about Russia, Russia, Russia,
because like so many political topics – amnesty for illegal aliens, attempting
to redefine marriage, boys in girls' bathrooms – Republicans are afraid to
speak out.
Judicial Watch Sues California and Los Angeles Over Dirty
Voter Registration Rolls
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-california-los-angeles-dirty-vote
DECEMBER 13, 2017
‘Eleven of California’s 58
counties have registration rates exceeding 100% of the age-eligible
citizenry.’
‘California has the highest rate of inactive registrations of any
state in the country. Los Angeles County has the highest number of inactive
registrations of any single county in the country’
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a
federal lawsuit against Los Angeles County and the State of California over
their failure to clean their voter rolls and to produce election-related
records as required by the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) (Judicial
Watch, Inc.et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No.
2:17-cv-08948)). The lawsuit was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California’s Western Division on behalf of
Judicial Watch, Election Integrity Project California, Inc., and Wolfgang
Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully
registered voters in Los Angeles County.
Judicial Watch argues that the State of California and a
number of its counties, including the county of Los Angeles, have registration
rates exceeding 100%:
Eleven of California’s 58 counties have registration rates
exceeding 100% of the age-eligible citizenry.
Los Angeles County has more voter registrations on its voter
rolls than it has citizens who are old enough to register. Specifically,
according to data provided to and published by the EAC, Los Angeles County has
a registration rate of 112% of its adult citizen population.
The entire State of California has a registration rate of
about 101% of its age-eligible citizenry.
Judicial Watch points out that this is due in part to the
high numbers of inactive registrations that are still carried on California’s
voter rolls:
About 21% of all of California’s voter registrations, or more
than one in five, are designated as inactive.
California has the highest rate of inactive registrations of
any state in the country…. Los Angeles County has the highest number of
inactive registrations of any single county in the country.
Although these inactive registrations should be removed after
a statutory waiting period consisting of two general federal elections,
California officials are simply refusing to do so.
Judicial Watch explains that, even though a registration is
officially designated as “inactive,” it may still be voted on election day and
is still on the official voter registration list. The inactive registrations of
voters who have moved to a different state “are particularly vulnerable to
fraudulent abuse by a third party” because the voter who has moved “is unlikely
to monitor the use of or communications concerning an old registration.”
Inactive registrations “are also inherently vulnerable to abuse by voters who
plan to fraudulently double-vote in two different jurisdictions on the same
election day.”
Judicial Watch sent a written request for public records on
November 16, 2017, and another on November 29, 2017, seeking information about
“the number of inactive registrations on the voter rolls in Los Angeles
County,” but was told each time that there were no responsive records.
Last summer, Judicial Watch sent a broader request for voter
roll records that Los Angeles County and the State of California are required
by the NVRA to keep and to make publicly available. Nothing was produced in
response to this request. Judicial Watch points out that it is impossible to
believe that there were no responsive records:
Los Angeles County, with over five million active voters and
massive list maintenance responsibilities, and the Secretary of State of
California [must] have exchanged emails responsive to [Judicial Watch’s]
request for “all email or other communications between the Secretary’s Office
and all California County voter registration officials concerning . . .
[i]nstructions to the counties concerning their general list maintenance
practices and obligations” and “[n]otices to the counties concerning any
failure to comply with their voter list maintenance obligations.” Such
emails should have been produced.
Section 8(a)(4) of the NVRA requires
states to implement a program to remove ineligible registrants; and to turn
over relevant records and information. Judicial Watch argues:
Los Angeles County is failing to properly conduct the list
maintenance required by the NVRA by failing to properly train employees,
failing to require and enter registrants’ birthdates, and failing to timely
process reports that registrants have died, have committed disqualifying felonies,
are mentally incompetent, or have registered twice.
Judicial Watch asks that the court enjoin Los Angeles County
and the state of California from further violating the NRVA, and compel them to
“develop and implement a general program that makes a reasonable effort to
remove from Los Angeles County’s rolls the registrations of ineligible
registrants.” Judicial Watch asks to inspect and copy the requested voter roll
records.
Judicial Watch sent a notice-of-violation
letter in August 2017 to threatening to sue
California and certain of its counties over their violations of the NVRA.
California was one of 12
states to receive such letters from Judicial Watch.
“California may have the dirtiest election rolls in the
country,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Federal law requires
states to take reasonable steps to clean up their voting rolls. Dirty voting
rolls can mean dirty elections. This lawsuit aims to ensure that citizens of
California can have more confidence that their elections are fair and honest.”
Judicial Watch Senior Attorney and Director of its Election Integrity
Project Robert Popper recently provided
testimony to the Presidential Advisory Commission on
Election Integrity concerning the NVRA. Popper was formerly Deputy Chief of the
Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department.
Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters threatening
to sue 11
other states having counties in which the number of
registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens, as calculated by
the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey: Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina and Tennessee. Judicial Watch informed the states that should they
fail to take action to correct violations of Section 8 of the NVRA, it would
file suit.
Judicial Watch previously filed successful lawsuits under the
NVRA against Ohio and Indiana that
resulted in those states taking several actions to clean up their voting rolls.
Judicial Watch is currently suing Kentucky over
its failure to remove ineligible voters as required by the NVRA, and is suing
the State of Maryland and Montgomery
County over their failure to release voting-related
records.
Judicial Watch is being assisted by Charles H. Bell Jr., of
Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, LLP; and H. Christopher Coates of Law Office of
H. Christopher Coates.
JOHN BINDER
CALIFORNIA MOVES CLOSER TO FINAL SURRENDER TO
LA RAZA SUPREMACY
DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP PER LA RAZA:
NO TEST, NO BACKGROUND CHECKS
ON CRIMINALITY, NO BACK TAXES, NO
FINES.... JUST JUMP STRAIGHT TO VOTING BOOTHS!
AND VOTE OFTEN!!!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/07/john-binder-californias-surrender-to.html
In 2013, California lawmakers passed legislation
that allowed illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses if they can prove to
the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) their identity and state residency. The
plan was one of the largest victories to date by the open borders lobby.… JOHN BINDER –
BREITBART.com
The biggest losers in Mexico's election? The Democrats
Every election has winners and losers, and Mexico's is no
exception. While the press is making much of Mexico's centrist PRI
and center-right PAN parties being the big losers in last night's election of
socialist Andrés Manuel López-Obrador in Mexico, the real loser is actually up
north, in the U.S. Democratic Party.
Sounds strange until you look at the details.
After all the ideological compatibility between AMLO's new lefty
MORENA party and the increasingly socialist U.S. Democrats seems to be
identical.
Both favor heavy social spending, forced unionization of workers,
political patronage, Chicago-style political muscle, and fealty to the ideals
of the Socialist International. It's what most socialists do until
they run out of Other People's Money.
Democrats have staked their future on uneducated, needy illegals
forming the base of their party's fortunes. In Mexico, AMLO has done
the same thing. The problem comes because the Mexicans in question
are the same people.
AMLO's social spending policies are likely to draw Mexicans
illegally here in the U.S. back to Mexico. If you have a choice of
taking welfare benefits here or welfare benefits there, it's likely you'll go
for them in your home country, where the language is the same, the Migra isn't
out looking for you, and you know your way around the culture. That's bad news for the Democrats, who rely on illegals to lard
up their electoral college votes in blue states, increase federal spending
based on head counts here, and actually vote illegally in elections,
particularly in districts where very few people are in the country legally.
It goes to show that even with ideological conformity, nations have
interests, and interests most certainly can conflict.
For many years, I had wondered why what passes
for Mexico's conservatives always seemed to be so
fiercely aligned to U.S. Democrats. Why was
former Mexican president Vicente Fox, Mexico's
first elected conservative via the PAN party,
always such a shill for Democrats? Why was
President Felipe Calderón, who came after him,
almost as obnoxious? Why did these people so
advocate for an end to U.S. borders and denounce
the American people as Nazis for opposing them,
despite their being fairly conservative and
ideologically recognizable on every other issue?
It turns out their political fortunes were built on getting as
many indigent Mexicans out of the country as possible. Their
governments benefited from their absence, both from remittances and in the way
they lowered social costs for the Mexican government in terms of housing them,
educating them, and providing them with income and health care among other
things. For a conservative government focused on fiscal discipline,
it was most certainly in their interest to drive as many of Mexico's poor to El
Norte, the better to get the gringo to pay, an old Mexican custom dating from
the war of 1848.
Democrats in the U.S., in turn, lapped up the new migrants, with
California's Democratic gov. Jerry Brown announcing "you're all welcome
here." His party benefited, and the more, the
better. The Catholic bishops also benefited, hence Steve Bannon's
admittedly harsh analysis that the Church was all in for illegals even as it
claimed to believe in the rule of law, because of its interest in "filling
the pews."
Now comes AMLO, whose big plan is to enact social welfare programs
in Mexico, a move that is sure to draw many Mexicans back to their home country. It
makes sense from his point of view and the viewpoint of his national interest,
given that Mexico can no longer afford to lose
people. Demographically, the median age is rising there, the
population growth has gone flat, and incomes have passed the $7,000-a-year
threshold, below which is said to trigger illegal immigration.
Nations always have interests, and this one conflicts with the
U.S. Democratic Party's interest, which, up until now, aligned with the
interests of Mexico's conservatives.
AMLO, if you look carefully at his words, seems cognizant of
Democrats recognizing this and maybe getting angry about it, thus he has
offered up to his ideological coevals in the States the "human right"
of illegal immigration to the U.S. as a sop, using other people's countries
instead of his own. Here are his words:
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO)
declared mass immigration to the United States a "human right" for
all North Americans during a speech Tuesday.
"And soon, very soon – after the victory of our movement – we
will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in
the world," Obrador said, adding that immigrants "must leave their
towns and find a life in the United States."
What we are looking at here is a bid to ship illegals from other
countries through Mexico to the U.S. (to keep Democrats happy), while
implicitly discouraging Mexican illegal immigration, which has drained the
country of talent. There is no other explanation for such a
policy. Turning Mexico into a road stop for illegals from Central
America and elsewhere by calling it a "human right" is frankly toxic
for Mexico, because it will empower cartels and give Mexico's government nothing,
not even remittances, and plenty of enmity with the U.S. What's
more, it should serve as an electoral mobilizer for Republicans, who will be
angry at the move.
Net effect: another loss for Democrats, in terms of lost people it
intended to build its party fortunes on and in energizing
Republicans. They're not going to like this.
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA "The Race" NOW CALLS ITSELF UNDIOSus AND IS FUNDED WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS.
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA
“THE RACE”by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called
"The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing
identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have
succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this
week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza,
the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."
Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who
called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media
have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
Here
are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses
for illegal aliens.
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition
discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S.
citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes
cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal
authorities.
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on
the southern border.
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
10. "The Race" opposed the state of
Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to
illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
8. "The Race" bitterly protested
common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed
post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
6. Former "Race" president Raul
Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S.
English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was
referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group
dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United
States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and
advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while
avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a
poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP
Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
4. "The Race" is currently leading a
smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called
for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off
the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut
up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race"
president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be
tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment
rights."
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic
nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8
million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in
Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez
Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los
Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White
water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of
collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain …
ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of
life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of
the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy
-- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian
Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The
fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.
ALIEN
NATION: Secrets of the Invasion
May
2006 – ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion – Why America's government invites
rampant illegal immigration
It's
widely regarded as America's biggest problem: Between 12 and 20 million aliens
(MOST SOURCES SUGGEST THERE ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY NEARLY 40 MILLION ILLEGALS
HERE NOW) – including large numbers of criminals, gang members and even
terrorists – have entered this nation illegally, with countless more streaming
across our scandalously unguarded borders daily.
The
issue polarizes the nation, robs citizens of jobs, bleeds taxpayers, threatens
America's national security and dangerously balkanizes the country into unassimilated
ethnic groups with little loyalty or love for America's founding values.
Indeed, the de facto invasion is rapidly transforming America into a totally
different country than the one past generations have known and loved.
And
yet – most Americans have almost no idea what is really going on, or why it is
happening.
While
news reports depict demonstrations and debates, and while politicians promise
"comprehensive border security programs," no real answers ever seem
to emerge.
But
there are answers. Truthful answers. Shocking answers.
In
its groundbreaking May edition, WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine
reveals the astounding hidden agendas, plans and people behind America's
immigration nightmare.
Titled
"ALIEN NATION," the issue is subtitled "SECRETS OF THE INVASION:
Why government invites rampant illegal immigration." Indeed, it reveals
pivotal secrets very few Americans know. For example:
Did
you know that the powerfully influential Council on Foreign Relations – often
described as a “shadow government" – issued a comprehensive report last
year laying out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North
American economic and security community" with a common "outer
security perimeter"?
Roughly
translated: In the next few years, according to the 59-page report titled
"Building a North American Community," the U.S. must be integrated
with the socialism, corruption, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada.
"Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S.,
Mexico and Canada. As Phyllis Schlafly reveals in this issue of Whistleblower:
"This CFR document asserts that President Bush, Mexican President Vicente
Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin 'committed their governments' to
this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.
The three adopted the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America'
and assigned 'working groups' to fill in the details. It was at this same
meeting, grandly called the North American Summit, that President Bush pinned
the epithet 'vigilantes' on the volunteers guarding our border in
Arizona."
The
CFR report – important excerpts of which are published in Whistleblower – also
suggests North American elitists begin getting together regularly, and presumably
secretly, "to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of
the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support transatlantic
relations." The Bilderberg and Wehrkunde conferences are highly secret
conclaves of the powerful. For decades, there have been suspicions that such
meetings were used for plotting the course of world events and especially the
centralization of global decision-making.
Did
you know that radical immigrant groups – including the League of United Latin
American Citizens (LULAC), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational
Fund (MALDEF), the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA) and the
National Council of La Raza (La Raza) – not only share a revolutionary agenda
of conquering America's southwest, but they also share common funding sources,
notably the Ford and Rockefeller foundations?
''California
is going to be a Hispanic state," said Mario Obeldo, former head of
MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it should leave." And MEChA's goal
is even more radical: an independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this
organization gives to the seven states of the U.S. Southwest – Arizona,
California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah. So why would the
Rockefeller and Ford foundations support such groups? Joseph Farah tells the
story in this issue of Whistleblower.
Why
have America's politicians – of both major parties – allowed the illegal alien
invasion of this nation to continue for the last 30 years unabated? With
al-Qaida and allied terrorists promising to annihilate major U.S. cities with
nuclear weapons, with some big-city hospital emergency rooms near closure due
to the crush of so many illegals, with the rapid spread throughout the U.S. of
MS-13, the super-violent illegal alien gang – with all this and more, why do
U.S. officials choose to ignore the laws of the land and the will of the people
to pursue, instead, policies of open borders and lax immigration enforcement?
The
answers to all this and much more are in Whistleblower's "ALIEN NATION"
issue.
Is
there hope? Or is America lost to a demographic invasion destined to annihilate
its traditional Judeo-Christian culture, and to the ever-growing likelihood
that nuclear-armed jihadists will cross our porous borders and wreak
unthinkable destruction here?
There
most definitely is hope, according to this issue of Whistleblower. Although
most politicians of both major political parties have long since abdicated
their responsibility for securing America's borders and dealing effectively
with the millions already here illegally, there are a few exceptions – most
notably Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo.
May's
Whistleblower includes an exclusive sneak preview of Tancredo's forthcoming
blockbuster book, "In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and
Security." In an extended excerpt, Whistleblower presents Tencredo's
expert and inspired analysis of exactly how to solve the nation's most vexing
problem.
One new Mexican president. Dozens of new reasons to build the wall.
In Mexico, it is often impolite to tell someone "No." If you want to spare someone's feelings, many people say "Maybe."
Everyone knows that means "No."
Mexico stopped worrying about American feelings long ago. Among the fashionable public officials and academics, scorn has been the ruling emotion for decades. We see that more recently in the last week's elections.
Pretending otherwise is just too much work in Mexico today. The new president declares he is a socialist, but he will be hard pressed to show how his new socialist policies are at all different from the old socialist policies that govern so many parts of Mexican life. That's what we said about Venezuela, come to think of it.
Those who predict that their "Fill in Blank" Latin American country has finally bottomed out and is now turning around are often, even invariably, wrong.
But at least admitting they are socialists has the added benefit of sticking a finger in the eye of their terrible neighbors to the north – who everyone knows ruined Mexico by stealing a good chunk of the country in 1848.
Anyone who reads the daily papers in Mexico is reminded of that 157-year-old treaty every day: for most of the country, the national slogan and curse remains "Mexico, so far from God, so close to the United States." We can even hear it today from Mexican nationals and their descendants in the U.S. who glorify La Raza at the expense of their adopted country.
Oh, and by the way, Americans are still waiting for any kind of public display of support for those who died on 9-11. Mexicans largely ignored it, when they were not supporting it behind closed doors at their local universities.
The truly troubling pronouncements out of Mexico City are even easier to find. The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration.
Then members of López-Obrador's Cabinet-in-waiting started talking about the war on drug cartels, and why should Mexico do America's dirty work?
The first statement does not need much interpretation, other than the obvious but often ignored: the new president of Mexico is encouraging his countrymen to invade the United States. Not with guns and soldiers, but with campesinos and huaraches.
It's a bitter and hostile act that we should treat as such.
The new talk about amnesty for drug-dealers is even crazier. This is just an admission of what anyone who cares to already knows: Mexico is run by a collection of drug cartels and other violent outlaws. This collection of criminals has killed thousands of public officials, policemen, and reporters – all in the name of preserving a criminal status quo that no one even feels like pretending does not exist anymore. They even write songs glorifying them.
They get what they want when they want it.
That is why we cannot build the Coulter-Trump Border Wall fast enough, tall enough, and proudly enough.
In addition to writing scintillating bestsellers about black violence in America, good ol' Colin Flaherty also covered Mexico for several newspapers and radio stations in San Diego, back in the day.
No comments:
Post a Comment