Wednesday, January 16, 2019

PELOSI'S OPEN BORDERS - PELOSI'S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY FOR THE BANKSTER-FUNDED DEMOCRAT PARTY'S GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BILLIONAIRES

IF ONLY THERE WERE A WALL: REPEATEDLY DEPORTED ILLEGAL ALIEN CHILD MOLESTER ARRESTED



 
2
If only there were some sort of barrier that would prevent criminals from coming and going from this country.
Jose Manuel Tiscareno Hernandez was arrested around 8:30 a.m. Saturday in Conroe,  the release said. Hernandez began abusing the child when they were only 11 years old.
When investigators executed a search warrant at a Conroe home in the 400 block of Gladstell, they learned Hernandez was planning to flee to Mexico. Investigators also collected other evidence at another location on Friday, the release said.
Hernandez has been deported to Mexico multiple times, authorities said.
He is now being held inside the Montgomery County Jail and a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement hold has been requested because of the crime committed and his immigration status, according to the release.
This is what Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and other Democrats shut down the government to protect.


Pelosi’s Border Policy: More Guards at the Front Door, Open Back Door



A migrant near the border fence between Tijuana, Mexico, and San Diego. President Trump has said there is a national security crisis at the border.
Daniel Ochoa De Olza/Associated Press
9
5:39

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to drain political support and funding from the planned border wall by repeatedly urging more federal spending to improve the official gateways through the border.

“If you want infrastructure, we need more infrastructure at the Ports of Entry,” she told reporters January 3.  She continued:
If you want to detect drugs, as we all do, then there is technology that can scan these cars coming through. We’re spending about $40 million, we should be spending about $300 million to do that, and that is by the border control people’s own numbers.
Breitbart TV



Current Time 0:18
/
Duration 1:43
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
“Pelosi is drawing attention to a real issue,” said Mark Krikorian, the director of the Center for Immigration Studies. He continued:
The Ports of Entry are a major source of smuggling, illegal aliens and drugs and what have you. But that does not mean you can leave the back door open.
In her response to President Donald Trump’s January 8 national address calling for a border wall, Pelosi again focused on the Ports of Entry:
We can build the infrastructure and roads at our ports of entry. We can install new technology to scan cars and trucks for drugs coming into our nation. We can hire the personnel we need to facilitate trade and immigration at the border. We can fund more innovation to detect unauthorized crossings.
Trump repeatedly makes the obvious counterpoint — that the drug smugglers and labor traffickers can always drive around any improved security at the Ports of Entry if there is no wall to stop them.
On January 14, Trump told a farm industry convention:
You can’t have openings because if you have an opening, they go here, and they just sort of go over this way, they find the opening spot, they come in …
Much of [the drug trafficking] comes through areas that are not your portals, including meth and cocaine and heroin and fentanyl. Heroin alone … kills 300 Americans a week, and 90 percent of it – at least – crosses the southern border.
On January 4, Trump told reporters that “We can’t let gaps. Because if you have gaps, those people are going to turn their vehicles, or the gangs — they’re going to coming in through those gaps.  And we cannot let that happen.”
On January 6, Trump also approved Pelosi’s call for more spending on the Ports of Entry, effectively denying  Pelosi the ability to treat it as an alternative to the border wall.
January 6 priority list from the Office of Management and Budget asked Congress to provide $5.7 billion for 234 miles of border wall, $631 million to buy extra devices to screen vehicles for drugs as they cross the border, and $800 million for extra “humanitarian needs” for the growing wave of job-seeking migrants. The extra funding would include money for “temporary facilities [at the border] for processing and short-term custody of this vulnerable population.”
But on January 11, Pelosi’s Ports of Entry talking point was added to the Democrats’ weekly address, given by California Rep. Scott Petes:
Our nation’s investments in Ports of Entry support a thriving international economy.  They also provide critical border security.  Customs agents inspect, weigh and x-ray vehicles and bags.  They make sure travelers have proper identification and valid visas – that they are properly vetted and screened before entering the United States.
That’s what real border security looks like, and I can tell you that San Diegans want that border security.  But we do not want a wall.
Trump has made 3-5 concessions in the border wall fight. But estb. media hides Democrats' refusal to offer anything in exchange. So Trump sees an incentive to escalate via a national emergency to get a wall. IOW, media's tilt skews DC political incentives http://bit.ly/2VIcUEM 

Pelosi’s talking point “seems to be a political expedient, something to give a talking point to Democrats when they are asked what kind of border control they do support,” said Krikorian. “Unfortunately, it brings to mind the scene from Blazing Saddles when the posse was stopped by a tollbooth in the desert. In real life, the posse ignores the toll booth.”
“You need to have proper vigilance at the front door but also lock the back door,” Krikorian said. “It seems that the Speaker is saying is the back door is fine, don’t worry about it.”
Before Trump was elected, Pelosi said little about improving security at the Ports of Entry, Krikorian said:
This new-found interest in the Ports of Entry is curious because where was she three, four, five years ago? Was she supporting major investments in the Ports of Entry back then? Maybe I missed it, but it smells like a political distraction.
Pelosi’s concern about the Ports of Entry is just one of many ideological and practice responses that Democrats offer to Trump’s border wall.
In her January 3 video, she also argues that the wall is an “immorality,” “an old way of thinking,” “is not who we are as a nation,” highlighting the Democrats’ support for open borders and diversity. She also said the wall would waste money, be ineffective, and is a political distraction from unpopular policies.
On January 10, Pelosi also argued that Trump’s pro-American immigration policy is discriminatory. She said:
Comprehensive immigration reform is what this debate should be about. And quite frankly when the president talks about this being national security issue, no it really, isn’t. It is about a policy that is discriminatory as to where people are coming into this country.

Nationwide, the U.S. establishment’s economic policy of using legal migration to boost economic growth shifts wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the market with cheap white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor. That flood of outside labor spikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor of blue-collar and white-collar employees.
The cheap labor policy widens wealth gaps, reduces high tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high tech careers, and sidelines at least five million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions.
Immigration also steers investment and wealth away from towns in Heartland states because coastal investors can more easily hire and supervise the large immigrant populations who prefer to live in coastal cities. In turn, that investment flow drives up coastal real estate prices, pricing poor U.S. Latinos and blacks out of prosperous cities, such as Berkeley and Oakland.


THE PELOSI DOCTRINE: SERVE BILLIONAIRES WITH EVEN CHEAPER LABOR AND EVEN WIDER OPEN BORDERS.
MORE MONEY LOST FROM FOOD STAMP FRAUD THAN IS SPENT ON A WALL TO DEFEND AMERICAN AGAINST THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS OPERATING OVER, UNDER AND IN OUR OPEN BORDERS!

BORDER AGENT RESCUES DROWNING MIGRANT INVADERS…. Mexico ships them back over the border to register Democrat and collect their anchor baby welfare!

 

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/pelosis-open-borders-border-patrol.html

 

*

"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally.  His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY

*


"They will destroy America from within.  The leftist billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion. They have nothing but contempt for us who must endure the consequences of our communities being intruded upon by gangs, drug dealers and human traffickers.  These people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY

*

The immigration debate has been raging for years.  Advocates for open borders can be found on both sides of the political aisle and in a wide variety of special interest groups who have come to see the immigration system that delivers an unlimited supply of cheap and exploitable labor, an unlimited supply of foreign tourists, and unlimited supply of foreign students and, for the lawyers, an unlimited supply of clients. MICHAEL CUTLER

GEORGE S OROS AND THE CLINTON GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BANKSTERS AND WIDEOPEN BORDERS

*
NEW YORK — Demand Justice, an organization founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and associated with a “social welfare organization” financed by billionaire activist George S oros, is raising money for an eventual court fight against what the group describes as President Trump’s proposed “racist, unnecessary wall.”
*
*
“Obama would declare himself president for life with S oros really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”
*
“Hillary was always small potatoes, a placeholder as it were. Her health was always suspect. And do you think the plotters would have let a doofus like Tim Kaine take office in the event that Hillary became disabled?”

 We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of 

THE PELOSI DOCTRINE: SERVE BILLIONAIRES WITH EVEN CHEAPER LABOR AND EVEN WIDER OPEN BORDERS.
MORE MONEY LOST FROM FOOD STAMP FRAUD THAN IS SPENT ON A WALL TO DEFEND AMERICAN AGAINST THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS OPERATING OVER, UNDER AND IN OUR OPEN BORDERS!
BORDER AGENT RESCUES DROWNING MIGRANT INVADERS…. Mexico ships them back over the border to register Democrat and collect their anchor baby welfare!

BORDER AGENT RESCUES DROWNING MIGRANT INVADERS…. Mexico ships them back over the border to register Democrat and collect their anchor baby welfare!


 

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/pelosis-open-borders-border-patrol.html

 

*

"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally.  His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY

*

"They will destroy America from within.  The leftist billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion. They have nothing but contempt for us who must endure the consequences of our communities being intruded upon by gangs, drug dealers and human traffickers.  These people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY

*

The immigration debate has been raging for years.  Advocates for open borders can be found on both sides of the political aisle and in a wide variety of special interest groups who have come to see the immigration system that delivers an unlimited supply of cheap and exploitable labor, an unlimited supply of foreign tourists, and unlimited supply of foreign students and, for the lawyers, an unlimited supply of clients. MICHAEL CUTLER
VIDEO:
THIS AMERICAN LIFE
NPR PROGRAM ON AMERICA UNDER LA RAZA OCCUPATION – GRIM!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/american-life-america-under-mexican.html

We spent eight months and did over a hundred interviews to try to bypass the usual rhetoric and get to the bottom of what really happened when undocumented workers showed up in one Alabama town. Pictured: Albertville “Miss Chick” 1954.

“Open border advocates, such as Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the CIS has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegals were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, CA, with its 2.6 million illegals, would be booming.” STEVE BALDWIN – AMERICAN SPECTATOR

 



The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave



Heather Mac Donald 

Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status. In Los Angeles, for example, dozens of members of a ruthless Salvadoran prison gang have sneaked back into town after having been deported for such crimes as murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and drug trafficking. Police officers know who they are and know that their mere presence in the country is a felony. Yet should a cop arrest an illegal gangbanger for felonious reentry, it is he who will be treated as a criminal, for violating the LAPD’s rule against enforcing immigration law. 

The LAPD’s ban on immigration enforcement mirrors bans in immigrant-saturated cities around the country, from New York and Chicago to San Diego, Austin, and Houston. These “sanctuary policies” generally prohibit city employees, including the cops, from reporting immigration violations to federal authorities.

No comments: