Saturday, February 16, 2019

BETO "BETOMATIC" O'ROURKE VOWS TO SERVE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S AGENDA OF WIDER OPEN BORDERS, BOTTOMLESS BAILOUTS FOR BANKSTERS AND ANYTHING THAT PUTS MORE MONEY IN DEM DONOR BILLIONAIRES' POCKETS

IS BETOMATIC A CLONE OF BANKSTER-OWNED BARACK OBAMA, THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST WHO SURRENDERED OUR BORDERS FOR 8 YEARS AS HE AND HOLDER SERVICES THEIR CRIMINAL BANKSTERS?

There are many parallels between “Betomania” and “Obamamania,” and O’Rourke has been called the “white Obama.”

He is married to the daughter of a billionaire, so if nominated, Democrats would have a hard time attacking Republicans for supporting a billionaire president without being accused of hypocrisy. 

 He also questioned whether the Constitution was still relevant, which makes one wonder how seriously he would take the oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” should he be sworn in as president. 

WORDS OF A PSYCHOPATH

"In his 2006 autobiography The Audacity of Hope, then-Senator Obama wrote, “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”  That is why Obama won the presidency, and should O’Rourke win too, that is why he will have won" 

Beto's Chances



One purported top contender for the Democrats’ presidential nomination so far has stayed on the sidelines: former Representative Robert Francis O’Rourke of Texas, better known as “Beto” O’Rourke.  A rising star in the Democratic Party, even after his unsuccessful attempt to win Ted Cruz’s Senate seat last year, he has been the subject of numerous media puff pieces, and liberals are going gaga over him the same way they did over Barack Obama in 2008.
O’Rourke is a polarizing figure.  To some, he is an optimistic, clean-cut, inspirational politician at a dark and foreboding time.  To others, he is a living embodiment of the “how do you do, fellow kids?” meme; a 46-year old man trying a bit too hard to seem cool and appeal to youngsters, skateboarding onto stage and live-streaming his dental appointment on Instagram. 
Though they laugh and roll their eyes as him, Republicans should not underestimate O’Rourke.  He is a formidable campaigner, having visited all of Texas’s 254 counties during his bid for Cruz’s Senate seat.  He has a dedicated and passionate base of supporters in Texas and the rest of the country.  He raised an enormous amount of money, more than any Senate candidate in historyHe came close to winning a Senate race in a solid red state, losing to Cruz by a mere 3 points.  And that is another reason Democrats are so excited about O’Rourke: they have their eyes on Texas. 
The state is slowly turning purple, thanks to immigration and residents of California and other blue states moving there.  Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton by only 9 points in 2016, while George W. Bush defeated John Kerry by 23 points in 2004.  Texas voted for Trump by a smaller margin than did Iowa and by only a slightly larger margin than did Ohio.  Republicans can no longer take Texas for granted, and Democrats believe they can win Texas if they run the right candidate. 
Another reason he could win the nomination: Democrats are nostalgic for Obama, and O’Rourke reminds them of him.  There are many parallels between “Betomania” and “Obamamania,” and O’Rourke has been called the “white Obama.”  O’Rourke also reminds Democrats of a Kennedy, another reason for his appeal.  He even has the same first and middle names as John F. Kennedy’s younger brother, Robert F. Kennedy. 
Liberals want to forget that Trump ever existed.  They want it to be the Obama years forever, and they think if the right candidate is elected, the country can get back to business as usual and the enormous rifts that have been growing in our country will simply disappear.  O’Rourke often laments the divided state of America and talks about how he wants to unite the country.  O’Rourke and his supporters don’t realize that uniting the country is a forlorn hope.  We can’t “bridge the divide” when half the country thinks MAGA hats are equivalent to KKK hoods. 
Twenty years ago, O’Rourke might have been a shoe-in for the nomination.  But times have changed.  He is a white male in a party increasingly hostile to white males and which seeks and celebrates greater diversity in its leadership.  John Kerry may be the last white male Democrats ever nominate for president. 
Aside from hatred of white males, there is another reason Democrats prefer their nominee be nonwhite and/or a woman.  As president, any criticism of Obama from the Right was dismissed as rooted in racism, and likewise any criticism of Clinton during her presidential bid was dismissed as rooted in misogyny.  So long as Democrats run candidates not white males, they can dismiss any criticism of them as rooted in some form of bigotry. 
If O’Rourke runs for president, Democrats lose this perceived opportunity.  Even if he isn’t nominated for president, O’Rourke could be chosen as vice president to keep his supporters behind the ticket.  In keeping with tradition, O’Rourke is an Irish Catholic -- for some reason, all recent vice-presidential nominees have been Irish Catholics: Joe Biden, Paul Ryan, Tim Kaine and Mike Pence (although Pence converted to Evangelical Christianity). 
Discounting his race and gender, O’Rourke still faces obstacles to getting the Democratic nomination.  He is very much an establishment Democrat in an increasingly progressive party, although he has publicly taken progressive positions, such as defending the NFL protesters and advocating for the impeachment of Trump.  He is married to the daughter of a billionaire, so if nominated, Democrats would have a hard time attacking Republicans for supporting a billionaire president without being accused of hypocrisy. 
Perhaps most importantly, O’Rourke has twice been arrested.  In 1995, he was arrested for attempted burglary for breaking into the University of Texas at El Paso, but the charges were dropped.  Three years later, he was arrested fordriving while intoxicated, after crashing into a truck and attempting to flee the scene.  In an op-ed, O’Rourke acknowledged the incident, calling it a “serious mistake for which there is no excuse.”  However, during a debate with Cruz, hefalsely claimed, “I did not try to leave the scene of the accident.” 
But a controversial past doesn’t always rub off on a candidate.  Obama associated with a communist professor who planted bombs and a pastor who said, “God damn America,” and it didn’t seem to hurt his candidacy.  The Gore campaign revealed close to election day in 2000 that Bush had a DUI, yet he still won.  And up until his death in 2009, Democrats still admired the “Lion of the Senate” Ted Kennedy, despite the Chappaquiddick incident. 
O’Rourke has many weaknesses, and his popularity may be less than we are led to believe.  Last Monday, Trump and O’Rourke held dueling rallies in El Paso. 
Video screen grab via RCP
Trump’s rally was attended by more people than O’Rourke’s rally, despite El Paso being his home town.  If O’Rourke can’t get more people to attend his rally than the president’s in the city where he was born and lived his whole life, is he really much of a threat to Trump?  Perhaps he’ll run for John Cornyn’s Senate seat instead and lose that race as well. 
There is also the question of his preparedness for the office of President of the United States.  In January, O’Rourke gave a lengthy interview to the Washington Post.  Aside from being totally opposed to a border wall, he had little to say on the issues aside from “I don’t know” and “I don’t necessarily understand.”  He also questioned whether the Constitution was still relevant, which makes one wonder how seriously he would take the oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” should he be sworn in as president. 
Last month, a website called draftbeto.org, which wants to do just that, released a short video in support of a Beto candidacy.
Much like O’Rourke himself, the video is full of meaningless platitudes and contains no concrete policy proposals. 
But what if that’s what the American people want?  What if voters don’t want someone with concrete policy proposals, but someone who makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside?  Did Obama win because of the issues, or because he promised Americans “hope and change?”  Did Trump win because of the issues, or because he promised to “make America great again?”  Elections have been decided by whichever side can best sell their candidate since at least the “Tippecanoe and Tyler too” campaign in 1840. 
O’Rourke is an empty suit that parrots liberal talking points, and supporters project their views onto him.  He is popular because of this, not in spite of it.  In his 2006 autobiography The Audacity of Hope, then-Senator Obama wrote, “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”  That is why Obama won the presidency, and should O’Rourke win too, that is why he will have won. 
Thomas OMalley can be contacted at thomasomalley861@yahoo.com


Beto Advocates Tearing Down Existing Wall on Texas Border






Beto O’Rourke, the Democratic former Texas congressman, addresses supporters before an anti-Trump march in El Paso, Texas, U.S., February 11, 2019. (REUTERS/Loren Elliott )

Former congressman Beto O’Rourke said Thursday evening that he would “absolutely” tear down the existing fencing separating his hometown of El Paso, Texas from Mexico.
“Yes, absolutely. I’d take the wall down,” O’Rourke told MSNBC’s Chris Hayes when the host referenced a question posed by Representative Dan Crenshaw (R., Texas) on Twitter ahead of the interview.




.@BetoORourke should answer a simple question tonight with respect to the border debate:

If you could snap your fingers and make El Paso’s border wall disappear, would you?

Because this DHS graph shows that when the wall was built, illegal crossings dropped significantly.



O’Rourke, who was elevated to the national spotlight during his recent failed Senate bid, argued that the fencing has not made the residents of El Paso safer and has directly contributed to the death of migrants.
“[The border wall] has cost us tens of billions of dollars to build and maintain, and it has pushed migrants and asylum seekers and refugees to the most inhospitable, the most hostile stretches of the U.S.-Mexico border, ensuring their suffering and death,” O’Rourke said. “More than 4,000 human beings — little kids, women and children — have died. They’re not in cages, they’re not locked up, they’re not separated — they’re dead.”
Department of Homeland Security data included in Crenshaw’s tweet indicates illegal border crossings in El Paso and other border towns have decreased significantly since fencing was erected.
Following the interview, Crenshaw immediately praised O’Rourke for being honest about his intentions.

At least Beto is honest about his open border policy. Most Dems claim to support a secure border while simultaneously undermining it at every turn.

Should also note: El Paso mayor stated “The fence has worked.” Residents have “stated that they felt more secure with the fence.”



10
O’Rourke has denied that he is an advocate for open borders in the past but has repeatedly argued that physical barriers of any kind cause migrant death.
“The number of people dying at the U.S.-Mexico border in some years has grown,” O’Rourke said during a town hall in El Paso in December. “In some years has grown because it’s connected to that wall that we have already built that pushes people who are at their most desperate and vulnerable to ever-more inhospitable stretches of the Chihuahua Desert.”
THE ENTIRE REASON OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN IS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
The past 40 years have seen the consolidation of a plutocratic elite, which has subordinated every aspect of American society to a single goal: amassing ever more colossal amounts of personal wealth. The top one percent have captured all of the increase in national income over the past two decades, and all of the increase in national wealth since the 2008 crash.

DEMOCRATS and their FAKE NEWS DEMOCRAT MEDIA support - - -
1) Illegal Immigration;
2) Birthright citizenship / ILLEGAL parents;
3) Chain Migration;
4) Lottery Immigration;
5) VISA overstays;
6) Sanctuary States, and Sanctuary Cities.
7) Doing away with ICE.
.
And because they refuse to completely FUND the Border Wall - they have proven that they support:
1) drug trafficking,
2) sex trafficking,
3) Latin American Gangs, and other Crimes.
The Democrat Party’s Platform:
1) 40 million voting illegals will finish off the GOP
2) 40 million illegals will provide generations of anchor baby breeding ‘cheap’ laborers which will cost legals hundreds of billions.
3) 40 million illegals will cause a staggering housing crisis across America’s open borders.
4) Democrats will keep their mouths closed on the staggering crime rate that follows their LA RAZA party base of illegals.

DEMOCRATS want the US Taxpayers to support ILLEGALS at all levels of Government. (Current cost approx. $115 BILLION each year at all levels of government. It costs approx. $10,000 per year for the education of 1 child.)

HERITAGE FOUNDATION:

AMNESTY WOULD DOUBLE U.S. POPULATION, POVERTY, HOUSING AND HOMELESS CRISIS

*

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/03/heritage-foundation-amnesty-would-add.html

*

"Critics argue that giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled Illegal alien population." JOHN BINDER

*

"Additionally, under current legal immigration laws, if given amnesty, the illegal alien population would be allowed to bring an unlimited number of their foreign relatives to the U.S. This population could boost already high legal immigration levels to an unprecedented high. An amnesty for illegal aliens would also likely triple the number of border-crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border." JOHN BINDER
 Beto O’Rourke: Tear Down Existing Border Wall



Former Rep. Robert Francis "Beto" O'Rourke (D-TX), the failed 2018 Senate Democrat nominee in Texas, said in an interview with MSNBC's Chris Hayes at the border that he would tear down existing border wall along the U.S. border with Mexico.
Paul Ratje/AFP/Getty Images
  Washington, D.C.4,098
2:14














Former Rep. Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke (D-TX), the failed 2018 Senate Democrat nominee in Texas, said in an interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes at the border that he would tear down existing border wall along the U.S. border with Mexico.









Embedded video

Democrat Beto O'Rourke says he wants to knock down the existing border barriers on the southern border

MSNBC's Chris Hayes: "If you could, would you take the wall down now? Knock it down?"

O'Rourke: "Yes, absolutely. I would take the wall down."



Hayes asked a question that was tweeted by Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), which is whether O’Rourke would tear down existing wall in El Paso despite the fact the wall there is working.








.@BetoORourke should answer a simple question tonight with respect to the border debate:

If you could snap your fingers and make El Paso’s border wall disappear, would you?

Because this DHS graph shows that when the wall was built, illegal crossings dropped significantly.



“If you could, would you take the wall down here now?” Hayes asked O’Rourke.
“Yes, absolutely, I would take the wall down,” O’Rourke replied.
O’Rourke is widely reported to be considering a run for the White House in 2020 as a Democrat against President Donald Trump. In response to O’Rourke’s push to tear down existing border wall, Donald Trump, Jr., the president’s eldest son who introduced his father at the El Paso rally earlier this week, joked on Twitter that he wants O’Rourke to run for president:
Trump’s campaign manager Brad Parscale also said that he wants to know if the other Democrats running in 2020, or potentially running, support O’Rourke’s radical view of tearing down existing wall:
At the El Paso rally on Monday night, Trump shifted his theme from “Build the Wall” to”Finish the Wall.”
On Thursday night, a veto-proof majority in Congress approved a widely unpopular spending bill that has other immigration problems in it but also funds the construction of 55 miles of new border wall along the U.S. border with Mexico. Trump is expected to sign the bill, thereby averting another government shutdown, but also to declare a national emergency wherein he will use executive authorities already delegated constitutionally and statutorily to the president to build the rest of the wall.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed on Thursday that Trump will declare a national emergency to build the rest of it.
What is particularly interesting, though, about this position from O’Rourke is that he is arguing the border–with a current wall in some places–has never been safer, but he wants to tear that wall down. This is before Trump even ever builds any new wall.






29 Migrants Found in Tractor-Trailers at Texas Border Checkpoints



Border Patrol K-9 Checks Tractor-Trailer for suspected human smuggling activity. (Photo: U.S. Border Patrol)
File Photo: U.S. Border Patrol
   61
2:08












Border Patrol agents in the Laredo and Rio Grande Valley Sectors found nearly 30 migrants in the sleeper and cargo areas of tractor-trailers as they attempted to sneak through inland Border Patrol checkpoints this week.

Falfurrias Station agents assigned to the immigration checkpoint located on U.S. Highway 281 observed a tractor-trailer approaching for inspection on February 12. During an initial walk-around, a K-9 agent alerted to the possible presence of drugs or human cargo in the truck’s trailer. The agents referred the vehicle to a secondary inspection station for further evaluation, according to Rio Grande Valley Sector Border Patrol officials.
During the inspection, agents unlocked the trailer and discovered 10 migrants inside. Agents identified the migrants as coming from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Mexico, officials stated.
The agents arrested the driver and seized the tractor-trailer. The migrants will be processed according to Rio Grande Valley Sector guidelines.
A few days earlier, Laredo North Station agents assigned to the Interstate 35 immigration checkpoint observed a tractor-trailer approaching the checkpoint for inspection. During an immigration interview with the driver and front-seat passenger, the agents asked the driver to open the curtain to the truck’s sleeper area. The agents observed several people inside the sleeper area.
Officials stated that the driver and passenger are U.S. citizens. They identified the 19 people packed into the sleeping area as illegal immigrants.
The Laredo Sector Border Patrol officials did not release any information about the nationalities of 19 the illegal immigrants. The driver will be held for referral for possible human smuggling charges.
Bob Price serves as associate editor and senior political news contributor for the Breitbart Border team. He is an original member of the Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTX and Facebook.






Spending Bill Allows Mexican Cartel-Connected Texas Counties to Stop Border Wall


Gulf Cartel Gunman
Breitbart Border / Cartel Chronicles
4:19












A key provision in the spending bill being presented to President Trump for signing stipulates that the federal government give specific Texas border counties the opportunity to derail any efforts to build barriers, fencing, or walls by simply opposing the construction of the border security measures–but many of the specified counties have a long and recent history of top officials taking bribes from the Mexican Gulf Cartel. Ultimately, the bill allows county offices with historic ties to the Gulf Cartel to stop U.S. border barriers from being constructed in the region.

Local government officials spoke out against the building of additional border barriers and have relied on the judgment of local law enforcement officials. As Breitbart News reported, the bill being presented to President Trump has a stipulation that would require the approval of local governments in order to move forward with the construction of any border barriers. However, the three counties where the border barriers were expected to be built are Starr, Hidalgo, and Cameron–three counties that in less than 20 years have seen five sheriffs and numerous top law enforcement officials sent to prison for receiving bribes from the Mexican Gulf Cartel, or other acts of public corruption.
The following are a few of the top law enforcement officials who were sent to prison or are currently being tried in corruption cases:
— Former La Joya Police Chief Geovani Hernandez is facing various drug trafficking charges for allegedly helping Mexico’s Gulf Cartel move cocaine and marijuana in order to pay for his campaign to a higher office. Hernandez is still awaiting trial.
— Former Hidalgo County Sheriff Lupe Trevino just finished serving a five-year prison sentence after pleading guilty to having taken money from convicted Mexican drug lord Tomas “El Gallo” Gonzalez in exchange for favors. During the investigation into Treviño’s dealings with Gonzalez, close to 20 Texas law enforcement officials pleaded guilty or were tried and convicted for various corrupt activities dealing with drug trafficking. Treviño’s son Jonathan Treviño is serving a 17-year prison sentence for being the de facto leader of a drug task force called Panama Unit that raided narcotics stash houses only to sell the seized contraband on the side.
— Former Cameron County Sheriff Conrado Cantu is serving a 24-year prison sentence for his role in protecting Gulf Cartel members living in his county and their businesses. Cantu helped protect the cartel’s drug trafficking, money laundering, and underground casinos.
— Former Starr County Sheriff Raymundo “Ray” Guerra spent 5 years and four months in prison for his role in helping members of Mexico’s Gulf Cartel move drugs freely through his county.
— Former Starr County Sheriff Eugenio “Gene” Falcon spent two years in prison for bribery and conspiracy to commit fraud. Falcon was accused by the FBI of taking bribes from a Starr County Bondsman in exchange for sending customers his way. However, according to news reports from the time, Falcon was known to have connections with Mexican drug lords and drug traffickers in the region. Falcon allegedly looked the other way since the drugs were moved through Starr County and were not distributed locally, as Texas Monthly reported in 1998.
— Former Hidalgo County Sheriff Brigido “Brig” Marmolejo was arrested and eventually convicted in 1994 after a 10-month long investigation. According to prosecutors, Marmolejo took a monthly $5,000 bribe and additional sums of money from top Mexican drug trafficker Homero Beltran Aguirre. The bribe was meant to earn preferential treatment for Beltran Aguirre who at the time he was being housed at the Hidalgo County Jail. Marmolejo would at times let Beltran Aguirre use his office so the drug lord could have conjugal visits from his wife or girlfriends. After serving his sentence, Marmolejo retired from the public eye.
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and Stephen K. Bannon.  You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook. He can be contacted at Iortiz@breitbart.com. 

Brandon Darby is the managing director and editor-in-chief of Breitbart Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Ildefonso Ortiz and Stephen K. Bannon. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. He can be contacted at bdarby@breitbart.com.

VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY LIKE TEXAS’ NARCOMEX BORDER COUNTIES THAT VOTED VIVA BETOMATIC?
BETO O’ROURKE HAS BEEN ENDORSED BY MEXICO. HOW IMPORTANT WILL THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES BE?


*

“In 2018, a volunteer for the Beto campaign urged followers to transport undocumented aliens (ILLEGALS) to the polls.”
*
“Many liberals believe that anyone in the United States – citizen or non-citizen – should be able to vote.  If they want to make that argument and change the law to make it happen, they are more than welcome to try.  Of course, if they run on that issue, they will get slaughtered at the polls.  So instead of going to the American people and working to change the law, they try an underhanded dirty trick to achieve the same goal.” APOLO VILLALOBOS

"American elites continue focusing on a global order while ignoring the decline of the United States. A broken America will be unable to meet any geopolitical threats abroad. Any national security strategy that does not begin with securing our own national security at home will be doomed to fail." DANIEL GREENFIELD

Knowing that the wall will become a reality if the President gets the cash brings out the cheap-labor-express, wealthy power brokers like the Billionaires for Open Borders: Michael Bloomberg; Rupert Murdoch; other distinguished members of the Forbes 500; and, as Lou Dobbs often reminds us, the "globalists, the Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, Koch brothers and Wall Street." 
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST BETO O’ROURKE… openly endorsed by Mexico!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/rep-beto-orourke-celebrates-his.html
O’Rourke tweeted his support for hundreds of undocumented people into American communities.
*
“Many thanks to volunteers & donors who ensure that we take care of families being released by ICE in El Paso. 200 to be released today. Over 500 tomorrow.” BETO O’ROURKE
*
 We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico….. AND THE ENEMY IS THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY!




O’Rourke: ‘Hard to Make a Rational Case’ for Emergency Declaration – ‘The Border Has Never Been as Safe and Secure’


  364
0:53








During a portion of an interview with MSNBC set to air on Thursday’s “All In,” former Representative Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) stated that it is difficult to “make a rational case” for a national emergency declaration, putting troops on the border, or additional border barriers, and “The border has never been as safe and secure as it is now.”
O’Rourke said, “It’s hard to make a rational case for an emergency declaration or troops on the border or any amount of additional border walls or border fencing or steel slats, even if it’s not 5.5 billion, even if it’s only 1.25. The border has never been as safe and secure as it is now.”
Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

PHONY BILLIONAIRE SWAMP KEEPER TRUMP VOWS HE WILL BEND OVER FOR THE KOCH BROTHERS AND KEEP AMERICA FLOODED WITH FOREIGNERS SUCKING UP JOBS AND WELFARE.
*
The Kochs and their network of donors have opposed any reductions to legal immigration to raise American workers’ wages; reforms to save U.S. taxpayers billions by ending welfare-dependent legal immigration; and an end to the country’s birthright citizenship policy that rewards illegal aliens’ U.S.-born children with American citizenship.

The Washington, DC-imposed mass legal immigration policy is a boon to corporate executives, Wall Street, big business, and multinational conglomerates, as America’s working and middle class have their wealth redistributed to the country’s top earners through wage stagnation.
 JOHN BINDER

No comments: