THE BIDEN INVASION - Health inspections for foreign nationals entering our country illegally have gone out the window. That's enabled the importation of many diseases which affect livestock and other agricultural output, and already these things are happening. Legal immigrants and even returning U.S. citizens must pass these inspections to protect the U.S. food supply. But under Joe Biden's catch-and-release, illegals are exempt from such cumbersome requirements. MONICA SHOWALTER
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
A NATION UNRAVELING - STOCKTON POLICE FACE 80 STUDENTS - This time the cops did not blow any heads off!
According to Killedbypolice.net, at least 808 people have been killed by police so far
this year, outpacing last year’s deaths by 20 victims.... and they ALL GET
AWAY WITH IT!
"Police in
the United States are trained to see the
working class and poor as a
hostile enemy.
Anything
less than complete submissiveness is
grounds for officers to unleash deadly
force on
their victims. In some instances, even the most
casual
encounters with police
have proven to be
deadly."
"In the overwhelming majority of police killings, of
which there are more than one thousand every year, no officer is ever
charged. In the few cases where charges are brought, most are found not
guilty. The Supreme Court has made it nearly impossible to convict a
police officer for murder stating that an officer is permitted to use
deadly force as long as he or she believes that either they or others are
in danger."
No
matter the outcome of the investigations authorized by the new attorney
general, William Barr, and the supposedly ongoing investigation by the DOJ
inspector general, the basic facts cannot be denied. Law enforcement
at the highest levels in this country has proven to be corrupt. The
faith that the American people once placed in the federal justice system has
been lost and may never be regained. The consequence of this
universal distrust is permanent damage to the underlying belief and faith in
the entire system and our country.
The
Department of Justice, the FBI, the CIA, and other domestic intelligence
agencies have once again been shown as political weapons to be used against
political enemies. This is not new. J. Edgar Hoover used
the FBI as his personal investigative tool to keep various members of Congress
in check and prosecute various enemies of his and the presidents he served
during his reign of terror. Robert (Bobby) Kennedy was John F.
Kennedy (the president)'s brother. Could there have been any undue
family influence on how Robert Kennedy carried out his
duties? Strangely, no one at the time in the press seemed to have
had a problem with this relationship. The attorney general and the
DOJ are primarily political tools of the president, who appoints the attorney
general. Why would the president appoint an enemy? But
suddenly this has become page one since it involves Trump and his appointees.
Congressional
oversight of the activities of the DOJ and its subsidiaries is 100%
political. Facts, truth, and the law have nothing to do with how
members of Congress, especially Democrats, carry out their supposed
"oversight" functions. The uproar regarding the Mueller
investigation would never have occurred if Hilary Clinton had been elected
president. No investigation of anything would have been
initiated. The attorney general would have been a friend and
supporter of Clinton, just as Holder and Lynch were friends and supporters of
Obama. Why is Trump different? Because
the Democrats hate him for "stealing" their
rightful power and control.
True
oversight of the Department of Justice can be accomplished only by a separate
and distinct investigative unit not under the direct political control of the
Congress.
Much
of the Judicial Branch of the government is highly politicized. One
need only look at the Ninth Circuit in California or the naked overreach of
district judges issuing rulings against this president that have national
implications and effect.
Given
the political history of the judicial system, I still suggest that the oversight
function of the DOJ and its subsidiaries be vested in the Supreme Court as the
least of all evils. I recognize the dangers inherent in giving nine
unelected judges such power. But history has shown that the present
procedures are seriously flawed. Trusting elected political animals,
whose existence depends on the whims of the mobs to which they cater, to behave
in a rational, logical, and lawful manner is like asking elephants to walk a
tightrope.
A
separate Supreme Court–monitoring unit whose function would be akin to the
existing inspector general's office of the various agencies with an independent
I.G. in each organization reporting to the Court might make more
sense. Another option would be a monitoring unit funded and
populated by the states.
Both
of these suggestions would be akin to the Civilian Review Boards that exist in
many cities to monitor the actions of local police
departments. Members of such commissions or boards could be drawn
from the wide spectrum of civic-minded civilian occupations, not just judges or
law enforcement people. The tasks would be so great as to negate the
possibility of volunteer members. This would call for full-time
dedicated, honest citizens. Where are Diogenes and his lamp when so
desperately needed?
Certainly,
a lot of thought and honest evaluation would have to be given to the exact
development, function, makeup, and legality of any such board, but I submit
that something must be done to rectify the dangerous situation that now
exists. Neither Congress nor the president will ever agree to this
type of monitoring, which would mean giving up some of their political
grandstanding activities in front of the TV cameras. But what is to
stop the Court from instituting a parallel monitoring ability on its
own? Inadequate or no funding from Congress? Where there
is a will, there is a way.
Is
this another item of change to be considered by the so-called Convention of
States?
Can
any republic such as the United States continue to exist when its philosophy of
equal justice for all is built on a foundation of shifting political
sands? From fixing speeding tickets to manufacturing evidence to
spying on citizens, the trust the people have had in law enforcement at all
levels has always been looked upon by the populace with a wink and a
nod. We cannot continue down the path to an equivalent KGB or
Gestapo type of justice system.
The
existence of corrupt law enforcement agencies and individuals is certainly not
unique in history. One needs only to remember the famous quote of
the Roman poet Juvenal: "Quis custodiet ipsos
custodes?" ("Who guards from the guards themselves?")
Police:
80 California High School Students Attack Officers, Cause Lockdown
Bear Creek High School in
Stockton, California, was placed on lockdown last week after an estimated 80
students attacked police officers who arrived on campus to detain one student
for fighting with school staff.
Stockton police estimated
that about 80 Bear Creek High School students were involved in a physical
altercation with police officers on Friday morning as the officers were
detaining one student for fighting with school staff, according to Stockton Record.
Video footage
captured the chaotic brawl, which shows scores of students surrounding the
officers in what appears to be an attempt to stop them from detaining the
student. Moments later, one student in the crowd can be seen throwing a garbage
can at the officers while the others jeer and shout.
Watch below:
Stockton police arrived at the high school on Friday morning to detain one
student who had been reported for fighting with school staff, but when the
student resisted arrest, it spurred around 80 other students to engage in a
physical struggle with officers and school staff members, according to police.
“During
this detention, officers were struck by several students and a garbage can was
thrown at officers and school staff,” said the Stockton Police Department.
The
incident resulted in the Lodi Unified School District placing the school
on lockdown.
“I don’t know what’s going on
with these kids,” said a concerned parent to FOX 40 News,
“I don’t know, even with the authority there and they’re still being too much.
It’s scary, it’s dangerous.”
“When
you go to school, you’re supposed to respect the authority that’s trying to
keep you safe while you’re here on campus,” added former Bear Creek High
student Kira Elkins.
Stockton
police did note, however, that no officers, students or staff members were
injured during the physical altercation, adding that the student who had been
initially detained was cited for resisting arrest.
It
remains unclear whether the other students involved will be charged.
No comments:
Post a Comment