VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal
that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the
world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components
of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500
audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly
philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
*
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hateful
Hillary Hopes to Run Again
https://townhall.com/columnists/jeffcrouere/2019/05/11/hateful-hillary-hopes-to-run-again-n2546172
Source: AP Photo/Kathy Willens
Hillary Clinton is the gift that just keeps on giving to President Donald
Trump and the Republican Party. She will not leave the political stage and
continues to keep herself in the public eye. After completing a rather unsuccessful
speaking tour with her husband, former President Bill Clinton, in which ticket
prices were slashed dramatically to fill empty seats, Hillary Clinton decided
to visit New Hampshire, the site of the first presidential primary in 2020.
Not only is Clinton not ready to endorse any of the
almost two dozen declared Democratic presidential candidates, she is still
flirting with a third race for the presidency. It seems Hillary is a horrible
listener and did not get the message from the 2016 election that the voters of
America don’t like her.
Despite being given CNN debate questions from her
friend Donna Brazile, Hillary had to cheat to defeat Senator Bernie Sanders and
win the 2016 Democratic Party presidential nomination. In the general election,
she outspent political novice Donald Trump by a two-to-one margin and still
lost in an electoral vote landslide. What was truly amazing about her defeat
was that she had 95% of the media on her side and decades of political
experience on her team, but was still defeated by a candidate who had never run
for any political office. Trump understood the importance of campaigning in
states like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which were ignored by
Hillary.
Ever since Election Night of 2016, Hillary has
harbored a deep animosity against both Donald Trump and the American people who
rejected her. She was never a gracious loser and claimed that she was a victim
of a great injustice. On her speaking tour, at an event in Los Angeles, Clinton
said that despite running “the best campaign,” a candidate can “still have the
election stolen from you.”
Clinton was obviously referring to her loss, for which she continues to
offer a variety of lame excuses. Of course, the real reason for her stunning
loss was that she was an awful candidate. According to Kellyanne Conway, White
House Counselor and former Trump Campaign Manager, Hillary Clinton possesses a
“fierce inability, intractable inability to connect with Americans.”
Instead of admitting the truth, Hillary regularly points to “Russian meddling”
as one of the reasons for her defeat, even though her campaign was one that
peddled the phony Steele dossier. This salacious and unverified document was
produced by Russian sources working through anti-Trump former British agent
Christopher Steele. It led to the spying on Trump aide Carter Page and the
unprecedented surveillance of an opposing political party’s presidential
campaign by U.S. intelligence agencies.
While Hillary’s campaign was not successful in
electing her President, it was successful in setting up Donald Trump for years
of unfair and potentially illegal harassment. Trump was the true victim of a
smear and spying campaign, while Hillary was given every possible advantage.
For example, she should have been indicted by the Department of Justice, but
her husband mysteriously met with then U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch on
the tarmac of the Phoenix airport. They supposedly discussed golf and
grandchildren, but, soon thereafter, then FBI Director James Comey exonerated
Hillary despite mountains of evidence, such as her improper handling of
classified emails.
Hillary Clinton was allowed to scrub her computer,
destroy her cell phones and was questioned by the FBI in the presence of her
attorneys, who were given immunity. She was the beneficiary of a double
standard of justice from the very beginning, while her opponent was targeted
and surveilled.
Her continuing comments are both laughable and sad. They reflect an
individual with an inability to accept reality. She plays the victim card,
while ignoring her tremendous flaws as a candidate and the massive advantages
that she enjoyed.
Hillary Clinton will never be able to move past the
2016 election for everything was arranged for her to win. She just did not
expect a candidate like Donald Trump to arise and espouse a powerful message
that connected with 63 million American voters.
Obviously, Hillary wants to run for President again
and take on Donald Trump in a 2020 election rematch. While she continues to
harbor this fantasy, it will only hurt the Democratic Party and boost President
Trump’s chances for re-election. As long as she continues to mount a pseudo
campaign highlighted by her long list of grievances, Hillary Clinton will serve
as a great reminder to the American people that they made the right choice in
the 2016 election.
Jeff Crouere is
a native New Orleanian and his award winning program, “Ringside Politics,” airs
locally at 7:30 p.m. Fridays and at 10:00 p.m. Sundays on PBS affiliate
WLAE-TV, Channel 32, and from 7-11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990-AM & www.Wgso.com. He is a political columnist, the
author of America's Last Chance and
provides regular commentaries on the Jeff Crouere YouTube channel and on www.JeffCrouere.com. For more information,
email him at jeff@jeffcrouere.com
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
Bill
And Hillary Tour Underwhelms In Ticket Sales, Attendance
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/12/01/bill-hillary-tour-underwhelms-ticket-sales-attendance/
Post–Mueller Report Reminder: The Russians Would Have Loved President Hillary Clinton
Had Daniel Patrick Moynihan been around for today's politics, fellow New York Democratic politician Representative Hakeem Jeffries may well have provided the inspiration for his astute quote: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."
During the recent House Judiciary Committee hearing, Representative Jeffriesasserted that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report showed that Moscow "artificially" placed President Donald Trump in the White House. As the House Democratic Caucus chair, and not said as some off-the-cuff remarks, Jeffries further insisted that "Russia interfered with our elections, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue."
Jeffries's contention flies in the face of the Mueller report's clear and unambiguous conclusion: yes, Russia did interfere in the election, but the investigation "did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign." Jeffries overlooks the fact that two years of intense investigation by a Mueller team of handpicked lawyers — largely Democratic donors and Clinton-supporters — did not return any findings supporting the charge of "collusion" (to the dismay of Democrats.)
Had Congressman Jeffries approached his solemn congressional oversight duties with objectivity, impartiality, and an open mind, the idea of Russia "colluding" with Donald Trump and his campaign — or even Russian support for Donald Trump — would never have made any sense to him.
Congressman Jeffries, like most Americans, must watch enough TV crime dramas to know that their favorite TV sleuths always seek to establish motive for a crime. Motive goes a long way to explain "who done it" and, more importantly, why. With Russia, TV's best would also have been at a loss to make a case against President Trump because there was never a persuasive explanation for collusion comporting with events and information tempered by a dose of perspective. What was Russia's motive, and what did the Russians stand to gain from colluding with Donald Trump?
Russia could have achieved its objectives — more easily and at less cost — with the pliable globalist President Hillary Clinton. In reality, autocrats, dictators, and warlords around the world wanted the more malleable Hillary Clinton instead of the nationalistic and assertive Donald Trump who campaigned on, and then adopted, a more aggressive "America first" leadership approach to defense and foreign policy.
That point is even more compelling, given the Trump administration's more uncompromising U.S. policy vis-à-vis Russia. Russia felt — in the Trump administration's first year alone — consequences of a more assertive United States. In November 2017, the U.S. approved the $10.5-billion sale of Patriot anti-missile systems to NATO ally Poland to counter perceived Russian aggression. In December, the U.S. authorized the transfer of anti-tank weapons to Ukraine to help that nation defend against Russian-backed separatists. U.S. troop presence in Eastern Europe was increased over Obama-era levels to bolster European defenses, while the U.S. imposed monetary sanctions targeting individual Russian actors and companies (rather than punishing that nation's sovereign debt.)
Further, the Trump administration persisted in convincing U.S. NATO allies to increase defense spending. In even more direct confrontations, Russian mercenaries and other pro-Syrian regime forces attacking U.S. troops in Syria were killed, while U.S. opposition to Russian president Putin's largest geo-economic project, the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline to Europe, threatens to pinch billions of dollars in revenue from an energy-dependent Russian economy.
Instead, Russia would fondly remember President Obama's secretary of state. Her inane "reset button" set the tone. Mr. Putin had surveyed the Hillary Clinton of Benghazi infamy and noted the facilitation of the transfer of largeuranium assets to Russia. The U.S. obliged the Kremlin by removing missile defense systems from Central Europe and never did more than complain about Crimea's annexation. The Obama administration's fuzzy line-in-the-sand indecisiveness over Syrian chemical weapons made way for Russia's effectivemilitary intervention in Syria. President Putin surely approved of Mr. Obama's concessions to Iran on the nuclear deal, and it was President Obama who notably told former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev that Vladimir Putin should give him more "space" because after his election he would "have more flexibility." He had, in essence, passed out samples of what a Clinton administration would allow.
In Hillary Clinton, Russia saw a candidate more interested in globalists' demands from Paris, Katowice, and Davos than tough issues like global proxy wars, Russian revanchism, nuclear proliferation, and NATO solidarity. Given the world's pre-election political and media consensus, a Clinton victory was almost assuredly a given inside the Kremlin. Albeit speculative, Vladimir Putin was probably just as surprised as CNN to wake up that November Wednesday morning in 2016 to learn the "impossible" had materialized.
Did Russia interfere in the 2016 election by other means? That answer is assuredly "yes," but there was no organized scheme of coordination, conspiracy, or "collusion" with the Trump campaign. It wasn't necessary and would pay no dividends. Clinton was Russia's preferred candidate.
So why would Russia interfere? Quite simply, to sow (more) discord and acrimony among the political parties and voters to undermine American government, society, and leadership. After the Trump victory, the Russian agitprop apparatus shifted to organizing anti-Trump demonstrations that American media all too obligingly covered. For all that, Kremlin actors likely exchanged high fives and fist bumps for their handiwork's amplified effects. You can bet they'll be back with more meddling in 2020.
All 400-plus pages of the Mueller report — redacted or not — are now a historical document. The more important question now is, whom does Russia — and whom do other global bad actors — wish to see in the White House come 2020? Whom would Vladimir Putin or Xi Jinping prefer to face in a stare-down with the stakes higher and the objectives being the Baltics, Central Asia, or the South China Sea? Which candidate does Iran or North Korea prefer to see in the White House? If our 2016 experience is prologue, such actors will both overtly and covertly default to the Democratic candidate.
U.S. competitors and adversaries want to see us fiscally exhaust ourselves on social programs instead of defense and security. They hope we are more interested in Davos, Paris, and climate change than Russian adventurism. They seek the further breakdown of societal mores and law and order and will take pleasure in watching Americans further divided by identity politics, bathroom protocols, and political animus.
One last, but not small, point for Congressman Jeffries and others. With Russian (and likely other) interference in the 2016 presidential election, one person was ultimately responsible for this nation's defense and security as "commander-in-chief." That was Barack Obama. With the known determined organized foreign interference, he ultimately failed in oath-sworn responsibilities to keep the nation's democratic processes secure and free from that interference.
In any thorough and continued forensic untangling of relevant events, shouldn't Americans know more about what all really happened? For the future, if we can acknowledge it in objective, impartial, and even bipartisan ways, our national security apparatus can be more and better prepared to combat, and maybe prevent, any new foreign interference during the 2020 campaigns, election, and beyond.
Chris J. Krisinger (colonel, USAF ret.) served in policy advisory positions for both the Pentagon and the State Department. He was a National Defense Fellow at Harvard University.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic
party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not
a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL
BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone
virtually unreported by Corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the
Clintons’
longstanding support for
“open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed
in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open
borders frequently comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy
foreign audiences and donors.
THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIA CONNECTION
*
WITH THESE
TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
*
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided
Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
///
THE
SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of
collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved
with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in
donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty
percent of all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the
financial benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton
Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She
would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from
under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Bill
And Hillary Tour Underwhelms In Ticket Sales, Attendance
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/12/01/bill-hillary-tour-underwhelms-ticket-sales-attendance/
Bill
and Hillary Clinton have taken their show on the road. Ticket sales for “An
Evening with the Clintons” are not what they once might have been, according to
all reports. With stops deliberately booked in what are assumed to be
Clinton-friendly cities, the aging power couple seems to be having trouble
filling seats.
It’s
not exactly a whirlwind tour. The schedule is downright lethargic in the
beginning. The first stop on November 27 was in Toronto, Canada with a stop the
next night in Montreal. The next stop on the schedule is Houston on December 4. In light of the passing of
former President George H.W. Bush, that date may be canceled or changed. But,
that’s all there is to the tour until 2019. They start back up in April 2019 in
New York City and continue through May, ending in Las Vegas on May 5. Does
anyone else think it’s odd that a former U.S. president and a former
Secretary of State began a self-promoting tour in Canada? Maybe it’s just me.
The
venue in Toronto only sold 3,300 tickets. Whole sections of the arena were
empty. I checked the website for ticket prices and for
the Houston stop, the cheap seats go for $15.00 and the most expensive ticket
price I could find was $1146.00. That’s a real bargain, especially
compared to the book tour events (it’s not just a book tour, they are events)
scheduled for former First Lady Michelle Obama. The high-end prices for the Michelle tour go for $10,000. That is
what I found and it’s not a stop in Houston but in Dallas at the American
Airlines Center. The Clinton venue in Houston is smaller.
Anyway,
you won’t be surprised to read that a good bit of the Clinton question and
answer conversation centers around her bitterness toward President Trump. He
lives rent-free in her head.
And
the former secretary of state was prepared to mock Trump’s
interview with the Washington Post just hours after it published, shaking her head at Trump
telling the paper “my gut tells me more sometimes than anybody else’s brain can
ever tell me.”
You “literally you can’t make
this stuff up,” she said. “A dozen times a day your head is spinning.”< And
near the end of the event, Hillary Clinton returned to Trump's gut, criticizing
him for saying he does not "believe" a recently released dire
government report on climate change. "It just riles me up," she said.
"If you won't listen to people who actually spend time over decades
studying problems, my goodness, your gut is not the answer to everything that
is important in the world, I'm sorry."
The
tour comes at a time when speculation is strong on whether or not Hillary will
actually make another attempt at a presidential run. She joked about standing
for Parliament in Canada when asked about any plans to run but you know she’s
thinking about. I don’t think she ever stops thinking about it. She’s consumed
with anger that Donald Trump won. While the next generation of Democrats is
ready to move up, the Clintons (especially Hillary) refuse to leave the stage.
It’s no wonder ticket sales are slow. Why would anyone pay money to listen to
them when almost any day an interview or quote is available in print or on
television? It’s not like either of them are saying anything new.
Also,
there’s the re-emergence of Monica Lewinsky. She’s been telling her story after
all these years. Don’t expect either Clinton to be asked about that whole
scandal, though. It’s not happening. The former horndog-in-chief
still gets a pass on the difficult questions.
But the kickoff comes at a
tenuous time for the Clintons: Not only is their standing in the Democratic
Party in question after neither was particularly prolific during the midterms,
but the event comes amid a renewed focus on Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica
Lewinsky, a moment in history that has gained more attention recently because
of a multi-part series on the affair on A&E and other retrospectives. The
Lewinsky affair and other allegations against of sexual impropriety Bill
Clinton are also being re-examined in the light of the #MeToo era.
One topic that Hillary is quick
to criticize President Trump on is his relationship with Saudia Arabia. It’s
ironic given the Clinton Foundation’s refusal to state that they will no longer
accept financial
donations from The Kingdom as others
have.
“We
have a president who is part of the cover-up as to what happened in that
consulate or embassy when Mr. Khashoggi was murdered,” Clinton said. “And we
have a president and those closest to him who have their own personal
commercial interests.”
But the Clinton Foundation, to
which donations declined dramatically after Clinton’s 2016 defeat, has taken
multi-million dollar contributions from Saudi Arabia in the past and isn’t
ruling out continuing to accept them.
The
Clinton Foundation accepted between
$10 and $25 million from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, with donations coming as
late as 2014. A now-defunct group named “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” which was
reportedly co-founded by a Saudi Prince and often worked as a PR front for the
kingdom, also donated between $1 and $5 million.
Implying
corruption about the sitting president in business dealings is probably not the
best idea. She and her husband have a legacy
of corruption. She
should just sit that conversation out.
More Trouble For The Clintons: FBI Raids The Home of DOJ Whistleblower Who Ratted on The Clinton Foundation
FBI
agents spent six hours raiding the home of Department of Justice whistleblower
Dennis Nathan Cain on Nov. 19th. According to Cain's lawyer, he was in
possession of documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One.
He had handed them over to the DOJ’s inspector general and both the House and
Senate Intelligence committees, The Daily Caller News Foundation reported.
From The Daily Caller:
The Justice
Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that
federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding
former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom,
the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, a document reviewed by The
Daily Caller News Foundation alleges.
The delivered documents also show that then-FBI Director Robert
Mueller failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to
Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One, the document reviewed by TheDCNF alleges. Mueller is now the special counsel investigating whether the Trump
campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 election.
Although
Cain handed over the documents, the whistleblower’s lawyer, Michael Socarras,
said the raid was excessive and went against whistleblower protections.
“The
bureau raided my client to seize what he legally gave Congress about the
Clinton Foundation and Uranium One,” Socarras told The DCNF.
A
special agent from the FBI's Baltimore division believed Cain had stolen
federal property and demanded to be let into the house. Cain let the agent know
that he was protected under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection
Act and that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz recognized
his whistleblower status. He also made the agent aware that he had submitted
the classified information to the Senate and House Intelligence committees. At
that point the special agent in charge of the sting direct 16 other agents to begin
a sweep Cain's property.
Cain
immediately handed over the documents to the FBI out of fear. Despite having
the documents, the FBI continued their raid.
“After
asking and getting my approval to do so, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz had a member
of his staff physically take Mr. Cain’s classified document disclosure to the
House and Senate Intelligence committees,” Socarras said. “For the bureau to
show up at Mr. Cain’s home suggesting that those same documents are stolen
federal property, and then proceed to seize copies of the same documents after
being told at the house door that he is a legally protected whistleblower who
gave them to Congress, is an outrageous disregard of the law."
Cain
came across the classified information while working for a government
contractor. Under whistleblower protections, the inspector general is to share
that information with the attorney general. At that time, the attorney general
was Jeff Sessions.
“The
[whistleblower act] authorizes employees of contractors to take government
property and give it to the two intelligence committees confidentially,”
Socarras said.
Here's
how the information was handed off:
Cain met with a
senior member of Horowitz’s office at a church close to the White House to
deliver the documents to the IG, according to Socarras.
Cain sat in a pew with a hoodie and sun glasses, Socarras said.
Cain held a double-sealed envelope containing a flash drive with the documents.
The IG official met him and, without saying a word, took the pouch over Cain’s
shoulder and left.
No comments:
Post a Comment