That’s a problem, granted. But the bigger disaster is this: Illegal immigrant criminals are destroying the United States, and one of the nation’s major political parties think it’s in its interest to continue the “fundamental transformation” of America … into a Third World hellhole.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission recently released its 2018 report on federal sentencing statistics: 42.7 percent of offenders were illegal aliens. Sixty-three percent of all non-citizens charged with drug trafficking last year were living in the country illegally.
BARACK OBAMA and ERIC HOLDER’S SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY: The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain. NEIL MUNRO
LA
RAZA DRUG CARTELS CUT OUT HEART OF LIVING MAN.
THE
LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS HAUL BACK OVER AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS NEARLY $60 BILLION
DOLLARS YEARLY. THEY OWN THE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM!
MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPTION and LOOTING OF AMERICA by
INVITATION OF THE GLOBALIST LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY for WIDER OPEN
BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/01/mexicos-invasion-of-america.html
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that
Obrador has previously proposed
ranting AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.
“America is now Mexico’s
social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the
Mexican ruling class,”
Carlson added."
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed
social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,”
Carlson added."
"The man likely to be the next president of Mexico just called for mass migration to the US" RICK MORAN
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all
the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,”
Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in
the United States.” RICK MORAN
Judge Blocks Emergency $1 Billion for Border Wall
1:48
A federal judge in Oakland, California, is blocking a $1 billion portion of President Donald Trump’s $8 billion emergency budget for building the border wall.
The blocked project used $1 billion allocated by Congress for anti-drug accounts. The preliminary injunction will apply while the judge fully considers the lawsuit filed by the Sierra Club and the Southern Border Communities Coalition, which includes leaders from pro-migration and environmental groups, as well as from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
“Plaintiffs also have shown a likelihood of success as to their argument that Defendants fail to meet the ‘unforeseen military requirement’ condition for the reprogramming of funds under Section 8005,” said the judge, U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam.
The administration’s “argument that the need for the requested border barrier construction funding was ‘unforeseen’ cannot logically be squared with the Administration’s multiple requests for funding for exactly that purpose dating back to at least early 2018,” he added.
The lawsuit also suggested that another $1.5 billion may be blocked because, in part, “the Court finds that Plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of irreparable harm to their members’ aesthetic and recreational interests in the areas known as El Paso Sector Project 1 and Yuma Sector Project 1.”
Gilliam was nominated to the bench by former President Barack Obama in 2014.
The case is Sierra Club, v. Trump, No. 19-cv-00892-HSG in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. The decision can be read here.
Federal judge's ruling to halt wall points to a judicial system out of control and in need of curbs
An Obama-appointed federal judge has done it again: Ruled in favor of unelected left-wing activists to block much of President Trump's border wall. According toThe Hill:
A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on Friday, partially blocking President Trump's plan to fund a border wall with Mexico using money from the Defense Department.California U.S. District Court Judge Haywood Gilliam, who was appointed by former President Obama, issued the order, which does not fully halt construction but would limit additional border fencing to specific areas. It would also block the transfer of about $1 billion in Pentagon funds from various projects to pay for the construction of a wall.
Pay no attention to that migrant surge at the border or the will of 63 million Americans who voted to elect Trump to stop them.
The judge made the ruling under this reasoning instead:
Gillam argued "irreparable harm" would result if the administration were allowed to proceed while the case is pending."Because the Court has found that Plaintiffs are likely to show that Defendants’ actions exceeded their statutory authority, and that irreparable harm will result from those actions, a preliminary injunction must issue pending a resolution of the merits of the case," he said in court.Gillam cited the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches outlined in the Constitution, particularly Congress's power of the purse, in making that determination.“The position that when Congress declines the Executive’s request to appropriate funds, the Executive nonetheless may simply find a way to spend those funds ‘without Congress’ does not square with fundamental separation of powers principles dating back to the earliest days of our Republic,” he wrote.
Irreparable harm because there's a border wall to keep criminals and welfare-seekers out? The criminals and foreign moochers have interests well above those of American voters and denying them so much as a day inside the United States to break one law after another and avail themselves of Americans' earnings does them "irreparable harm"?
What garbage. What's more, there's nothing here about shifting funding around that hasn't been established as 'precedent' - something lefties love to extol - given that President Obama shifted funds around from federal bureaucracies to keep Obamacare afloat after a Republican Congress denied him the funding he wanted. Obama also ruled by executive order - as in the case of DACA - and even President Trump's efforts to rescind those flimsy executive orders have been blocked by the activist-judicial industrial complex. See, it's only O.K. if Democrats do it, that's the real message we are seeing from this politicized judge.
It joins a collection of federal overturnings of President Trump's efforts to keep the country safe and secure at its southern border and beyond. A recent news item from the New York Times reported that Attorney General William Barr complained that federal judges had blocked Trump on executive orders and attempts to govern 37 times in the past year, more than all the nationwide injunctions from federal judges issued in all of the 20th century put together.
“Nationwide injunctions undermine the democratic process, depart from history and tradition, violate constitutional principles, and impede sound judicial administration, all at the cost of public confidence in our institutions and particularly in our courts as apolitical decision makers,” Mr. Barr said.He emphasized that the separation of powers, rather than the granting of certain rights, protected the United States from tyranny. “As Justice Scalia colorfully quipped, ‘Every banana republic has a bill of rights,’” Mr. Barr said.
What we are seeing here is a power grab from a ravenous left-wing judiciary, intent on making the most outrageous rulings at the request of any left-wing activist group to supersede the will of the people. They will have their way no matter what the voters, those godawful deplorables, think, and an eager corps of left-wing judges with no respect for law except in how it serves leftwingery, are glad to help out. This is not democracy, this is rule by a leftist nomenklatura, a Deep-State adjunct which has already disgraced itself over the FISA approval process in the invented Russia collusion narrative.
Americans within the majority are not without power here - this latest injunction underscores the need to get rid these judges' power by getting rid of the current bounder House ruled by impeachment-obsessed Democrats. It shows how necessary it is to elect a bunch of representatives interested in what's going on in the country, including the threats we face, and ensuring that no petty left-wing activist playing victim can superced it. These congressional Democrats are at the root of the problem because they would block any such necessary reform. They need to be thrown out. Then, when a Republican (or non-crazy Democrat) Congress is elected, the first order of business, even ahead of the border crisis, should be judicial reform.
One of the three branches of government is out of control here and it's not the one headed by Donald Trump.
“Attorney
General Eric Holder's tenure was a low point even within the disgraceful
scandal-ridden Obama years.” DANIEL GREENFIELD / FRONTPAGE MAG
Senate
Hearing: Obama’s DACA and Flores Orders Spiked Illegal Migration
NEIL MUNRO
23 May 201918
4:54
The illegal
migration of “family units” and “unaccompanied alien children” spiked after
former President Barack Obama signed off on the “DACA” amnesty and the Flores court order, according to a graphic
used by the chairman of the Senate Homeland Defense Committee.
Committee
chairman Rep. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., touted the jarring graphic by printing it
on paper cups used by the committee members. The graphic contradicts claims by
Democrats that the huge wave of Central American economic migrants are really
refugees from a humanitarian disaster caused by crime and crop failures in
Central America.
Officials
expect almost one million Central American migrants in the 12 months prior to
October 2019. The migrant wave includes hundreds of thousands of people in
“family units.” These units consist of adults who bring youths and
children to help trigger the border catch-and-release loophole.
The
primary catch-and-release loophole is the Flores court order, because it requires
border agencies to release migrants within 20 days if they bring children. Once
released, the migrant adults take jobs in American workplaces and their
children are sent to the schools used by the children of blue-collar Americans.
The Flores decision “has been
the essential driver, frankly, for the increase in family units,” said Kevin
McAleenan, the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security in a May
23 committee hearing. He continued:
That
certainty, that knowledge, that they will be allowed to stay in the US.
indefinitely, pending a court [asylum] proceeding that could be years away … is
a huge draw. Smugglers have capitalized on that. They’re advertising that fact.
We hear that routinely from our interviews with families.
The
2015 extension of the 1993 Flores judgment
was accepted by the Obama administration, even though it requires border
agencies to release migrants within 20 days if they bring children. Obama’s
legal team could have fought the decision by filing appeals with higher courts,
but it instead signed an agreement to implement the decision.
Under
policies set by judges, the 2015 agreement by Obama, ACLU activists, and the
judge binds President Donald Trump, even though he did not approve it, and even
though the Supreme Court did approve the extension.
Obama’s
2012 DACA amnesty offered a sanctuary from deportation, plus work permits and
Social Security Numbers, to roughly 800,000 migrants who had been smuggled over
the border by their parents. The giveaway is legally
shaky, but it prompted many other illegal migrants to get their
children delivered from Central America by smugglers to U.S. border agencies,
which then passed the children to the parents.
This
government-enabled smuggling
operation helped bring tens of thousands of carefuly smuggled Unaccompanied
Minor Children (UACs) into the United States. Very few migrants have been sent
home, according to federal data.
Democratic
legislators have refused to reform the border rules, ensuring that 100,000
migrants — including 40,000 children — walked over the border in April 2019,
into the nation’s job sites and schools.
However,
Trump’s deputies are preparing a regulation that would allow them to detain
migrants with children for more than 20 days.
But
Obama holdovers in the agencies have slowed the regulation. The Flores requirement that
state officials set up a health and safety inspection process for family
detention centers has also delayed the regulatory fix.
Democrats
say the migration is a humanitarian crisis but deny their role in creating the
disaster, which is now emptying parts of Guatemala.
The US govt's appetite
for more cheap labor is distorting Central America's economy by encouraging
& subsidizing migration instead of boosting local investment &
job-growth via trade. http://bit.ly/2VHmkPG
Central American Towns Empty as Migrants Rush
to U.S. Border Loopholes
Trump’s
deputies are also developing other programs to stop the flow, such as the “Remain
in Mexico” program, which prevents migrants from getting jobs while they wait
for court hearings. If denied jobs, the migrants would not be able to pay the
travel costs owed to the Mexican cartels and will not make the trip.
Trump's 'Remain in
Mexico' program is helping ensure that pregnant migrants cannot cheat the legal
asylum process by birthing a child in the U.S. Pro-migration groups are aghast.
http://bit.ly/2X3qNhr
Los Angeles Times: Border Agencies Return
Pregnant Migrants to Mexico
This
year’s inflow of one million illegal migrants from Central American is only a
small slice of the immigration economy.
Each
year, roughly four million young Americans join the workforce after
graduating from high school or university.
But
the federal government then imports about 1.1 million legal immigrants and
refreshes a resident population of roughly 1.5 million white-collar visa
workers — including roughly one million H-1B workers — and approximately
500,000 blue-collar visa workers.
The
government also prints out more than one million work permits for foreigners,
tolerates about eight million illegal workers, and does not punish companies
for employing the hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants who sneak across
the border or overstay their legal visas each year.
This
policy of inflating the labor supply boosts economic
growth for investors because
it ensures that employers do not have to compete for American workers by
offering higher wages and better working conditions.
This
policy of flooding the
market with cheap foreign white-collar graduates and
blue-collar labor shifts
also enormous wealth from young employees
towards older investors even as it also widens wealth
gaps, reduces high-tech
investment, increases state
and local tax burdens, and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
It also pushes Americans
away from high-tech careers and sidelines millions of marginalized
Americans, including many who are now struggling with
fentanyl addictions. The labor policy also moves business investment and
wealth from the heartland to the coastal
cities, explodes rents
and housing
costs, shrivels real
estate values in the Midwest and rewards investors for creating low tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
Nancy Pelosi is promising
to raise wages via gov't socialism, but Trump's "Hire American"
immigration/labor-supply policy is nudging wages up by 3-4 percent a year. Yes,
politicians competing over rival wage-raising policies would be a great thing. http://bit.ly/2Vgymzk
Wage Raises: Donald Trump, Nancy Pelosi Tout
Rival Plans
EconomyImmigrationPoliticsBarack Obamacatch and releaseDACAFlores court
orderH-1BimmigrantimmigrationMigrantmigrationRemain in MexicoUACs
///
DACA
Amnesty Would Render Border Wall Useless, Cost Americans $26B
Eric Baradat/AFP/Getty- mages
5:36
A deal in which
President Trump accepts an amnesty for millions of illegal aliens enrolled and
eligible for President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
program in exchange for minor border wall funding would be counterproductive to
the “America First” goals of the administration, depressing U.S. wages in the
process ahead of the 2020 election.
As
Breitbart News has extensively chronicled, Attorney
General Jeff Sessions ended the DACA program last year, although it’s
official termination has been held up in court by left-wing judges.
Since
then, a coalition of establishment Republicans and Democrats have sought to ram
an amnesty for up to 3.5 million DACA-enrolled and eligible illegal aliens
through Congress, an initiative supported by the donor class.
CLOSE | X
Such a plan, most recently, has been
touted in an effort to negotiate a deal in which Trump receives anywhere
between $1.6 tand $5 billion for his proposed U.S.-Mexico border wall in
exchange for approving a DACA amnesty for millions.
The
amnesty would render the border wall useless, as it would not only trigger
increased illegal immigration at the border — which is already set to hit
the highest annual level in a
decade next year — but increased legal immigration to the country.
Last
year, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen admittedthat even
discussion of a DACA amnesty increased illegal immigration at the
southern border, as migrants surge to the U.S. in hopes of making it into the
country to later cash in on the amnesty.
Kansas
Secretary of State Kris Kobach previously predicted that a
DACA amnesty would trigger an immediate flood of a million illegal aliens
arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border. In 2014, when Obama enacted DACA by
Executive Order, the temporary amnesty caused a surge at the southern border,
as noted by the Migration Policy Institute.
In
terms of legal immigration, a DACA amnesty would implement a never-ending flow of
foreign relatives to the DACA illegal aliens who can be readily sponsored for
green cards through the process known as “chain migration.”
According to Princeton
University researchers Stacie Carr and Marta Tienda, the average number of
family members brought to the U.S. by newly naturalized Mexican immigrants
stands at roughly six. Therefore, should all 1.5 million amnestied illegal
aliens bring six relatives each to the U.S., that would constitute a total
chain migration of nine million new foreign nationals entering the U.S.
If the number of amnestied illegal
aliens who gain a pathway to citizenship under an immigration deal were to rise
to the full 3.3 million who would be eligible for DREAM Act amnesty, and if
each brought in three to six foreign family members, the chain migration flow
could range from 9.9 million to 19.8 million foreign nationals coming to the
U.S.
At
this rate of chain migration solely from a DACA amnesty, the number of legal
immigrants arriving to the U.S. with family relations to the amnestied
population would potentially outpace the population of New
York City, New York — where more than 8.5 million residents live.
Should the goal of Trump’s proposed
border wall be to reduce illegal immigration and eventually incentivize
lawmakers to reduce legal immigration levels — where the U.S. imports 1.5
million immigrants every year — to raise the wages of America’s working and
middle class, a DACA amnesty would have the opposite impact, increasing illegal
and legal immigration levels.
The
president has also touted the wall as a benefit to American citizens in terms
of cost. A border wall is projected to cost about $25 million, a tiny figure
compared to the $116 billion that
illegal immigration costs U.S. taxpayers every year.
A DACA amnesty, coupled with a
border wall, would have steep costs for American citizens — wiping out the
cost-benefit to taxpayers of the wall.
For
example, a DACA amnesty would cost American taxpayers about $26 billion, more than
the border wall, and that does not include the money taxpayers would have to
fork up to subsidize the legal immigrant relatives of DACA illegal aliens. And
because amnesties for illegal aliens tend to be larger than initially predicted,
the total cost would likely be even higher for taxpayers.
Additionally,
about one in five DACA
illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at
least one in seven would
go on Medicaid, the CBO has estimated.
The number of DACA illegal aliens
who will go on Medicaid following an amnesty is likely to be much larger than
what the CBO reports.
Previous research by the Center for Immigration Studies indicates that
the average immigrant household in the U.S. takes 44 percent more Medicaid
money than the average American household. The research also noted that 56
percent of households led by illegal aliens have at least one person on
Medicaid.
Another
study, reported by Breitbart News, indicates
that the CBO estimate of DACA illegal aliens who would end up on Medicaid after
an amnesty is the lowest total possible of illegal aliens who would go on the
welfare program.
Meanwhile, a DACA amnesty would drag increasing U.S. wages down
for the country’s working and middle class, delivering benefits to the business
lobby while squashing the intended goals of the Trump administration ahead of
the 2020 presidential election. The plan is also likely to hit the
black American community the hardest, as
they are forced to compete for blue collar jobs against a growing illegal and
legal immigrant population from Central America.
On Tuesday, Trump said he would be
willing to shut down the federal government in order to secure funding for his
proposed border wall. Democrat leaders Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Rep. Nancy
Pelosi (D-CA) have previously indicated that they would be willing to swap an
amnesty in exchange for funding border “security measures.”
Trump ‘immigration reform’
ignores real problem
President Donald Trump participates in a roundtable on
immigration and border security at the U.S. Border Patrol Calexico Station in
Calexico, Calif., Friday April 5, 2019. Trump headed to the border with Mexico
to make a renewed push for border security as a central campaign issue for his
2020 re-election. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
Trump
‘immigration reform’ ignores real problem
President Donald
Trump participates in a roundtable on immigration and border security at the
U.S. Border Patrol Calexico Station in Calexico, Calif., Friday April 5, 2019.
Trump headed to the border with Mexico to make a renewed push for border
security as a central campaign issue for his 2020 re-election. (AP
Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
By HOWIE CARR | howard.carr@medianewsgroup.com | Boston
Herald
OK, so President Trump’s “immigration reform plan” is
nothing more than a campaign document, a talking point, to impress the likes of
the Wall Street Journal (which gave him a big wet kiss of an editorial
Saturday) and the Chambers of Commerce.
But as everyone knows, the problem isn’t so much who we are
keeping out of the country – educated, English-speaking people with a work
ethic – as opposed to the shiftless, lawless hordes we are allowing to swarm
across the southern border in untold numbers.
The problem is most of these undocumented Democrats are
future recipients of at least one welfare handout, and even worse, they include
a sizable contingent of future MS-13 gangbangers, drive-by shooters, identity
thieves and fentanyl dealers.
On Thursday, at the White House, the president
halfheartedly raised the specter of these marvelously educated foreign college
grads being forced to return home. But c’mon, how many MIT and CalTech grads
really get the heave-ho?
When he announced for president in 2015, Trump famously
said, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best.”
Now it’s worse, much worse, because it’s not only Mexico flushing its
criminal underclass into the U.S., it’s Honduras, El Salvador, Guatemala and
every other country where they’ve been running TV ads telling their unwed
mothers, winos and freelance criminals that all they need to do is tell the
gringos that they’re seeking “asylum,” and then it’s off to the welfare
free-stuff office.
As the old song goes, “Everything free in America.”
The
U.S. Sentencing Commission recently released its 2018 report on federal
sentencing statistics: 42.7 percent of offenders were illegal aliens. Sixty-three
percent of all non-citizens charged with drug trafficking last year were living
in the country illegally.
Look what happened at the Quincy District Court Friday. ICE
was staking it out, looking to grab a Dominican heroin/cocaine dealer with a
phony Puerto Rican identity. He didn’t show.
On
Thursday, in Texas, a “Dallas man,” as the Associated Press described him, was
charged with the murders of 11 elderly American women between the ages of 76
and 94, as he stole their jewelry and other valuables. In the third paragraph,
the AP copped to the truth – the serial killer was “a Kenyan citizen who was
living in the U.S. illegally.”
Here’s another recent headline: “ICE arrests Salvadoran
murder suspect, gang associate in South Dakota.”
Question:
Since when is South Dakota a border state? Answer: Since Barack Obama was
president, maybe even before then.
As
George W. Bush used to say, they’re only doing the jobs Americans won’t do.
Jobs that apparently include fentanyl and meth dealing, not to mention dismemberment
of their underworld rivals and too many instances of domestic abuse and drunken
driving to even recount? In case you missed it, ICE has picked up 141 illegal
immigrant drunken drivers in recent weeks, just in New England.
Here’s a recent headline from the Worcester Telegram:
“Three men arrested in Millbury in alleged scheme to defraud banks.”
“Three men” – that’s the dead-giveaway phrase. The only
remaining question is, in what paragraph will the paper mention the perps’
immigration status?
In this story, the answer was, the 17th: “The detective
said the three suspects each had passports from Ghana. She said she was unsure
of their citizenship status.”
I’m not unsure at all. Are you?
Next, a few recent press releases from the feds in New
England. First, from the eastern district of Massachusetts:
“Dominican National Pleads Guilty to Identity
Theft/Defendant stole identity of US Army Specialist … Dominican National
Sentenced for Social Security Fraud … Dominican National Pleads Guilty to
Social Security Fraud and Identity Theft … Brazilian National Sentenced for ATM
Skimming.”
Here are a few from Connecticut:
“Third Nigerian National Admits Role in Business E-Mail
Compromise Scheme Targeting CFO’s and Controllers … Mexican National Convicted
of Illegal Reentry for a Third Time … Citizen of Peru Charged with Illegally
Reentering US.”
That Peruvian illegal immigrant was a drug dealer and
warrant defaulter.
Let’s
not slight Rhode Island: “15 Individuals Convicted, Sentenced in Heroin and
Cocaine Trafficking Conspiracy.”
Unfortunately, the R.I. U.S. Attorney’s Office buried the
lede about the drug outfit headed by one Juan Valdez: “Eleven of the ‘Operation
Triple Play’ defendants, many of whom had been living in the United States with
stolen identities, including the three brothers who led the drug trafficking
organizations, have or will face deportation proceedings … Juan Valdez was
previously deported from the United States on four occasions.”
Look, I understand, every resort,
restaurant and hotel owner in New England needs H2B visa workers to get through
the resort season. That’s a problem, granted. But the bigger disaster is this:
Illegal immigrant criminals are destroying the United States, and one of the
nation’s major political parties think it’s in its interest to continue the
“fundamental transformation” of America … into a Third World hellhole.
MICHELLE MALKIN
15 THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE AMERICAN
TAX-FUNDED MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “The Race” NOW CALLING ITSELF
UNIDOSus.
"This is country
belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common
teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught
to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program
funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA
$800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The Democrat Party’s Legacy of the
'Hispanicazation' of America
No comments:
Post a Comment