Tuesday, May 21, 2019

THE REAL ECONOMY - FORD SLASHES 7,000 WHITE COLLAR JOBS

Ford slashing 7,000 white collar jobs

In a scene played out just a few months ago at General Motors, hundreds of engineers, managers, technicians and other white-collar workers at Ford will lose their jobs this week as part of Ford’s plan to cut 7,000 salaried workers, ten percent of its global white-collar workforce, by August.
The job cuts are part of a restructuring of the global auto industry. Over the last six months, job cuts have been announced by GM (14,000), Volkswagen (7,000), Jaguar Land Rover (4,500), and Tesla (3,000). This is driven by Wall Street and other global investors who are pushing carmakers to cut costs and increase profit margins as sales fall in the major North American, Chinese and European markets, trade tensions sharpen, and signs continue to mount of a new global recession.
The job cuts further expose the lies about a 
“booming economy” peddled by the Trump 
administration and echoed by the Democrats.
While the stock market, corporate profits and 
CEO pay continue to rise, millions of workers 
live in a state of perpetual economic 
insecurity.
Ford's World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan
Workers leaving Ford’s World Headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan, Monday afternoon told World Socialist Web Site reporters that there would be meetings this week where human resource managers would inform employees whether they had a job or not. The cuts have been hanging over the heads of workers for seven months, ever since Ford CEO Jim Hackett announced the company’s $11 billion global cost-cutting campaign, euphemistically dubbed “Smart Redesign.”
According to the Detroit Free Press, “Ford employees packed boxes with their belongings on Friday and headed home for the weekend, not knowing what would happen Monday as word spread to prepare for what employees predict will be ‘Armageddon’ in Dearborn.”
“A lot of people are going to be leaving Ford,” one manager told the newspaper. “It may well be in the hundreds, if not thousands. I don’t know if I’ll have a job past Tuesday.” Another said, “The cuts appear to heavily be a cost cutting measure against future pension level costs.”
In an internal email, Hackett said, “notifications to employees in North America affected by wave four of Smart Redesign will begin [Tuesday],” and the “majority will be completed by May 24.” He added that “restructuring work continues in Europe, China, South America,” and “we expect to complete the process in those markets by the end of August.”
In April, Ford said it would cut 5,000 jobs in Germany. It is also ending production at a transmission plant in Blanquefort, France, near Bordeaux, closing three factories in Russia, and shuttering its oldest factory in Brazil as part of the company’s exit from the commercial truck business in South America. Ford also laid off 2,000 workers at its joint venture in Chongqing, China, after sales in the country fell by 40 percent.
According to Ford spokesmen, 500 salaried workers in the US will be involuntarily laid off this week and a total of 800 by June. With the 1,500 US employees the company claims have already accepted so-called voluntary buyouts, the total number of white-collar Ford workers forced out of their jobs in the US has reached 2,300.
The exact number of global job cuts could likely be much higher than the 7,000 announced in Hackett’s letter. Estimates by industry analysts have suggested that layoffs, buyouts and retirements of Ford employees and contractors could reach 25,000 globally, far more than the job cuts announced by GM late last year.
In a gesture of corporate magnanimity, Hackett—who made $17.7 million last year, 276 times the median compensation of a Ford worker—assured “team members” that Ford had moved away from past practices of forcing fired workers to leave company property “immediately.” Instead, the company would give them “the choice to stay for a few days to wrap up and say good-bye.”
Wall Street investors, who have long been punishing Ford’s stock prices, have bid it up by 34 percent since the company began its jobs bloodletting. Ford intends to double its profit margin in order to boost stock buybacks and dividend payouts, the latter of which rose to $2.3 billion last year.
In March, Ford announced it was hiring as its new chief financial officer Tim Stone, the former vice president of finance for Amazon who led the $14 billion acquisition of Whole Foods. Stone, who takes over as Ford CFO on June 15, brings his expertise from a company that has perfected the exploitation of its workers, electronically monitoring their every move and measuring their restroom time, in a manner that would put Henry Ford’s time-motion study experts to shame.
Announcing the company’s first-quarter profits last month, Hackett told investors that the results were proof that his push to cut costs and improve profitability around the globe is working. “We have a solid plan to create value in the near term and the long term,” Hackett said. “The results clearly demonstrate the benefit of our fitness actions. There’s more to come.”
Despite one-time downsizing charges, Ford made $1.1 billion in first quarter profits. In North America, it made $2.2 billion in profits, up 14 percent from 2018, and its profit margin rose to 8.7 percent from 7.8 percent. Hackett has called 2019 the “year of action.” Like GM, Ford management plans to use the threat of mass layoffs in this summer’s contract negotiations to demand sweeping concessions, particularly in healthcare benefits, from Ford’s nearly 60,000 hourly workers in the US.
The carmakers have relied on decades of collusion with the United Auto Workers to slash hundreds of thousands of jobs, halve the wages of new hires and vastly expand the number of disposable part-time temporary workers. Predictably, the UAW has nothing to say in response to Ford’s job-cutting plan because the union supports it.
There is a growing sense, however, that blue-collar and white-collar autoworkers have to unite to fight layoffs and a realization that such a fight must be organized by workers themselves, independently of the UAW.
A comment posted by a salaried Ford worker on the web site thelayoff.com expressed this determination and more broadly the growing anti-capitalist sentiments gripping ever-wider sections of workers.
“Ford is no longer an automotive or a mobility company. It’s a profit company. Its sole focus is to deliver good quarterly results and returns to shareholders. And this problem is not at all restricted to Ford. We are at a point in our economy where the only focus is on profit margins and returns. Any loyalty large companies may have had to their employees in the past is nonexistent.”
The worker said he was “absolutely NOT advocating for something like the UAW, which has evolved to have its own hierarchy and has been repeatedly found to be conspiring with the auto companies themselves at the expense of the hourly workers. The UAW is corrupt and is a bad example of what collective representation should be.
“Separately and individually we have no leverage against the company. But if we were able to collectively say stop it with the layoffs or we will all walk off the job, we would have power over the company. We’ve seen this pattern repeat itself enough times in the past that even after this round of cuts is over, it’s likely that we’ll just be facing them again a few years from now. The only way we can do anything to stop this cycle is to band together.”
Pointing to the broader issues, he concluded, “Inequality has been skyrocketing in this country for decades, and I only ask everyone to recognize that the threats we face as the working class are only going to grow from here on. But as the workers that actually make this company run day to day, we need to find a way to band together to ensure our future job security.”
Indeed, the relentless assault on jobs poses the need to build new organizations of struggle, including factory and workplace committees that are democratically controlled and will not bow to Wall Street’s dictates. But the task of unifying autoworkers and other sections of workers coming into struggle, like teachers, hospital, Amazon and other workers, must be combined with the fight for a new political perspective and strategy.


The fight for the social right to a good-paying and secure job for all workers requires an irreconcilable opposition to the nationalism promoted by Trump, the Democrats and the unions and the fight to unite the working class in the US and around the world on the basis of a socialist program. This includes the transformation of the other auto giants into publicly owned utilities run on the basis of human need, not private profit.

AMERICA: THE RICH GET MUCH RICHER 

AND THE MIDDLE CLASS GETS 

BLUDGEONED…. Illegals get the jobs!

*
Why do the billionaire class all want wider open borders and hordes more “cheap” labor illegals? It’s all about keeping wages depressed for greater profits!

*

“Today’s society benefits those who shaped it, and it has been shaped not by working men and women, but by the new aristocratic eliteBig banks, big tech, big multi-national corporations, along with their allies in the academy and the media—these are the aristocrats of our age. They live in the United States, but they consider themselves citizens of the world” Sen. Josh Hawley 

*
*
"This is how they will destroy America from within.  The leftist billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion of millions of migrants.  They have nothing but contempt for those of us who must endure the consequences of 
our communities being intruded upon by gang members, drug dealers and human 
traffickers.  These people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY

“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.” THEODORE ROOSEVELT
*

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com

*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes."
*

"The tax overhaul would mean an unprecedented windfall for the super-rich, on top of the fact that virtually all income gains during the period of the supposed recovery from the financial crash of 2008 have gone to the top 1 percent income bracket."

*

Graph from the Economic Policy Institute

Decades of decaying capitalism have led to this accelerating divide. While the rich accumulate wealth with no restriction, workers’ wages and benefits have been under increasing attack. In 1979, 90 percent of the population took in 70 percent of the nation’s income. But, by 2017, that fell to only 61 percent.
*

Millionaires projected to own 46 percent of global private wealth by 2019


While the wealth of the rich is growing at a breakneck pace, there is a stratification of growth within the super wealthy, skewed towards the very top.

At the end of 2014, millionaire households owned about 41 percent of global private wealth, according to BCG. This means that collectively these 17 million households owned roughly $67.24 trillion in liquid assets, or about $4 million per household.
By Gabriel Black
*
The massive increase in the value of the stock market, which only a small segment of the population participates in, means that the top 10 percent of the population controls 73 percent of all wealth in the United States. Just three men—Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates—had more wealth than the bottom half of America combined last year.

DESTROYING AMERICAN ONE INVADING ILLEGAL AT A TIME…
IS THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE THE GREATEST ENEMY OF THE AMERICAN (Legal) WORKER?
What this means is that what is good for Main Street will not be good for Wall Street and Big Biz, at least not in the short run. What benefits the American worker -- fair trade policy and tight immigration control -- will initially hurt Big Biz and Wall Street. 

Ford Motor Co to Cut 10% of White Collar Jobs as Part of Global Restructuring

BY REUTERS
May 20, 2019 Updated: May 20, 2019
DETROIT—Ford Motor Co said on May 20 that it will eliminate about 10% of its global salaried workforce, cutting about 7,000 jobs by the end of August as part of its larger restructuring in a move that will save the No. 2 automaker $600 million annually.
Ford Chief Executive Officer Jim Hackett said in an email to employees that the cuts include both voluntary buyouts and layoffs, and a spokesman added it freezes open positions as well. About 2,300 of the affected people are employed in the United States, the spokesman said.
“To succeed in our competitive industry, and position Ford to win in a fast-changing future, we must reduce bureaucracy, empower managers, speed decision making, focus on the most valuable work and cut costs,” Hackett said in the email.
Ford has been restructuring its operations globally to improve profitability and speed product development, making or announcing cuts in Europe, South America, and Russia.
The automaker also has signed a deal with Germany’s Volkswagen AG to join forces on commercial vans and pickup trucks. The companies are also negotiating a broader alliance for electric and self-driving vehicle development.

A Volkswagen logo appears on the wheel of a VW Passat GTE Variant on display
A Volkswagen logo appears on the wheel of a VW Passat GTE Variant on display at the annual general meeting of German car manufacturing giant Volkswagen in Berlin, on May 14, 2019 . (John Macdougall / AFP/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump has pushed boosting auto sector employment, criticizing automakers, especially General Motors Co for cutting jobs, but has focused primarily on blue-collar cuts at factories rather than white-collar reductions.

President Trump awaits arrival of Swiss Federal President Maurer
President Donald Trump at the White House on May 16, 2019. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)

The White House did not immediately comment on Monday about Ford’s salaried cuts.
Restructuring work continues in Europe, China, South America, and the International Markets Group and the Dearborn, Michigan-based company expects to complete the process in those markets by the end of August, said Hackett, who has described 2019 as a year of transition for the company.
Within the cuts, Hackett said it will eliminate close to 20% of upper-level managers, a move intended to reduce bureaucracy and speed up decision making. Before the redesign of its operations, Ford had up to 14 organizational layers, but that will be cut to nine by year-end, Hackett said.
Notification to North American employees will begin on Tuesday and the majority will be completed by May 24, he said.
The Ford family are the controlling shareholders. Hackett said it would give those affected by the job cuts a few days to wrap up and say goodbye, emphasizing Ford’s position as a family company. That stood in contrast to how GM handled layoffs earlier this year where employees were asked to leave immediately.
By Ben Klayman

Kamala Harris: ‘America’s Economy Is Not Working for Working People’



Kamala Harris Los Angeles (Joel Pollak / Breitbart News)
Joel Pollak / Breitbart News
JOEL B. POLLAK
   1,935
5:09

LOS ANGELES, California — Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) received a raucous welcome on home turf on Sunday, as her campaign held its first organizing rally of the 2020 Democratic primary at Los Angeles Southwest College.

Roughly 2,000 supporters and curious Democratic voters attended, filling one half of the gymnasium on a windy weekend afternoon. Harris was preceded by several local politicians who have endorsed her, including Los Angeles City Council President Herb Wesson; California Secretary of State Alex Padilla; and first-term Rep. Katie Hill (D-CA).
“We are at an inflection moment in the history of our country,” Harris told the crowd. It is a time, she said, for Americans to ask: “Who are we?”
The answer, she said, had to be: “We are better than this.”
Signs throughout the audience riffed on the campaign’s “For the People” slogan, including “Justice for the people” and “Fearless for the people.”
There were some hiccups at the event — a sign of the trouble the campaign has had finding its stride.
The crowd was placed to the side of the stage, meaning that Harris’s supporters were out of most camera angles during her speech. Speakers kept urging supporters to text “fight” to a devoted campaign number, but a sign on the podium told supporters to text the word “fearless.” And after several lively warmup speeches, the action paused for several minutes while Tina Turner’s “What’s Love Got to Do With It?” played over the PA system.
Harris referred to the Charlottesville riots, and the recent synagogue shootings in Pittsburgh and Poway, in calling on her supporters to “speak out” against hate.
“Let’s speak truth: America’s economy is not working for working people,” she added, reprising her message from Nevada last week. She mocked the idea that the economy is “great,” saying it was “fine if you own stocks.” She also claimed that unemployment numbers were good because people were “working two or three jobs to put food on the table.” She added that women earn “80 cents on the dollar” compared to men, and vowed to force companies to close the gap.
Harris also promised to repeal President Donald Trump’s tax cuts on “day one” in office, and said health care was a “right.” She added: “Women’s access to reproductive health care is under attack.
“And we will not stand for it,” she declared, to loud cheers and stomps in the bleachers.
She also talked up gun control, saying that children should not have to ask, “Why, Mommy and Daddy,” when faced with the prospect of school shootings.
She drew cheers by interjecting: “Or — ‘Why, Mommy and Mommy?’ or ‘Daddy and Daddy’?”
If elected, she said, she would give Congress “one hundred days to pull their act together” on gun control. And if it did not, she would use an executive action to impose background check requirements on anyone selling more than five guns a year.
She added that America needed criminal justice reform because people could be shot “because of the color of [their] skin.”
She also addressed immigration policy — “Separating babies from their parents at the border is not border security” — and declared that “climate change is real.”
She added, to cheers, that “Russia interfered in the election” in 2016, and slammed President Trump for accepting Russian President Vladimir Putin’s word over that of U.S. intelligence agencies.
And Harris closed with a call to national unity that has become her refrain on the campaign trail, noting that “the vast majority of us have so much more in common than what separates us.”
California’s primary will be more important in 2020 than in previous years, after the state moved it from June to March. It will be held on Super Tuesday, March 3, 2020 — the fifth primary contest of the election cycle.
Some in the audience were committed Harris voters; others were unsure.
Rame Shor, a professor at the college, told Breitbart News that he was supporting Harris because “she has better experience” than other candidates. He added that he believes she can catch former vice president Joe Biden, who currently leads in the polls by double-digit margins, because of what he called her strong level of grassroots support.
Gaby Mohaupt of Los Angeles was unsure if she would vote for Harris, but told Breitbart News that she would back any candidate that stood for pro-choice policies against the recent spate of pro-life legislation in Republican states.
“I’m open-minded,” she said, “but leaning toward a woman.”
Emmett Keith-Jones, a PTA official from Riverside County, drove to L.A. from Temecula to attend the event. He said he would support Harris because he had met her personally, and because “she understands the diversity of California.”
Asked about Biden’s lead, he said, “I don’t think that matters much.
“It’s just like with Obama. We just need Oprah to say something,” he joked.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

No comments: