Silicon Valley Tech Firms Donate $254,717 to Elizabeth Warren
Listen to the Article!
By Corinne Weaver | October 23, 2019 7:57 AM EDT
Even though Democratic presidential candidate Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) wants to break up Big Tech and regulate it, those who profit from the tech industry support her anyway.
Warren had her most successful fundraising quarter yet, raising $125,305 from employees at Facebook, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and their subsidiaries. Overall, in the past year, Warren has raised $254,717 from tech employees. Six hundred and sixty tech workers total gave to Warren’s campaign. Overall, Silicon Valley tech workers have donated a total of $1,206,976 to Democratic candidates.
The Massachusetts senator has by far the most radical plan when it comes to dealing with Big Tech companies. She wrote back in March for Medium that she planned on breaking up Big Tech companies, saying, “That’s why my administration will make big, structural changes to the tech sector to promote more competition — including breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google.”
Morning Consult writes that Mayor Pete Buttigieg received the second highest number of political donations, amounting to $237,919 this year. Facebook has deep ties to Buttigieg’s campaign, going back as far as CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s time at Harvard University.
Warren may have collected the most money, but candidate Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) has attracted more people. Morning Consult estimates the number of tech workers who donated to Sanders at 869.
Warren announced in October that she would not accept donations of more than $200 from executives at tech companies or banks. The senator wrote in Medium that “when I’m the Democratic nominee for president, I’m not going to change a thing in how I run my campaign: No PACs. No federal lobbyists.”
Facebook has been a target of Warren’s complaints from the beginning, and the candidate even posted a false ad on Facebook to demonstrate her issue with the lack of fact-checking. After Zuckerberg announced that he would not fact-check politicians, Warren tweeted, “Facebook is accepting millions of dollars from Trump to run political ads, including ones with misinformation and outright lies. Ads that TV stations won't even run.”
Zuckerberg has said in leaked audio to
the Verge that he was concerned about
Warren’s plan to regulate Big Tech,
particularly Facebook. He said, “I mean, I
don’t want to have a major lawsuit against our
own government. ... But look, at the end of
the day, if someone’s going to try to threaten
something that existential, you go to the mat
and you fight."
This bipartisan immigration bill will change the face of America
Video: Michelle Malkin Speaks at the Freedom Center
the Verge that he was concerned about
Warren’s plan to regulate Big Tech,
particularly Facebook. He said, “I mean, I
don’t want to have a major lawsuit against our
own government. ... But look, at the end of
the day, if someone’s going to try to threaten
something that existential, you go to the mat
and you fight."
This bipartisan immigration bill will change the face of America
In July of this year, the
U.S. House overwhelmingly passed H.R. 1044, the Fairness for High-Skilled
Immigrants Act. The bill had broad bipartisan support, with
Democrats voting 224-8 in favor of it and Republicans voting for the act by a
measure of 140-57. The legislation represents one of the most horrific acts of
aggression against the American worker in decades. It reveals that
American immigration policy is really just a competition among various groups
struggling for supremacy, with Congress ceding control of immigration to the
most powerful foreign actors: India and China.
Currently, a cap is in
place that limits the number of H-1B tech visas so that no more than 7% of the
total number of those visas come from any one country. H.R. 1044
eliminates this cap. The primary benefactors of this removal are the
Indian tech workers who have been brought over to this nation and face a
backlog due to this cap as well as the workers in India who seek to come to the
U.S. It is estimated that once this legislation goes into effect,
India will receive more than 90% of these visas for the next
decade. The legislation also increases the per-country cap on
family-based immigrant visas from 7% to 15%.
As if this were not
enough, the legislation also alters the number of EB-5 investment visas that a
nation can purchase — opening the door to mass migration from China.
In 2017, the U.S.
issued roughly 180,000 H-1B Visas. Assuming
that each of those visa-holders brought over a wife and two children and 90% of
those Visas came from India, this would mean an addition of roughly 6.5 million
new Indian residents over the next decade. This would more than
triple the Indian population in the U.S. even before chain migration kicked in.
The average pay for tech
workers in the US is $39,000 a year. The effect this legislation
would have on this already low salary as well as to the established culture of
the nation will be catastrophic, to say the least.
The list of congressional
representatives who support and oppose this legislation shows that politics
does indeed make strange bedfellows. Included among the narrow swath
of opponents are the normal cadre who oppose mass migration as well as those
who oppose the bill for personal reasons, such as Congresswoman Ilhan Omar from
Minnesota and Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib from Michigan. Omar is an
immigrant from Somalia, and Tlaib is the daughter of Palestinian
immigrants.
So why does an immigrant
and the daughter of immigrants oppose legislation that would open a massive
door to large numbers of immigrants? The answer to this question is
as simple as it is painful. These representatives want immigration
to come from their native lands, and H.R. 1044 reduces or eliminates immigrants
from those nations in favor of India and China. In effect, America
is up for grabs, and Congresswoman Omar and Congresswoman Tlaib see this
legislation as detrimental to their people's ability to gain a larger foothold
in America.
Ten of the 23 Republican
representatives from Texas cosponsored the bill (the state with the highest
Republican support). A total of 16 of those 23 voted for the
legislation. Texas already has an immigration problem, and this
legislation would exacerbate this problem for the Republican party.
Ernst and Young and Deloitte LLP are two of the
largest recipients of H-1B Visas. These two companies have donated
an average around $10,000 to 16 or 17 Texas Republican congressional
representatives in each of the last few election cycles. The
interesting part about this is that many of the representatives who received
this money voted against the legislation, and some that received none of it
voted in favor of the bill.
Newly elected congressman
Dan Crenshaw (District 2) cosponsored the legislation. He and
Congressman Weber (District 14) are two notable exceptions to the list that
received money from Deloitte and E&Y. Congressman
Crenshaw's third highest donor is a firm that
specializes in real estate known as Ilan Investments. The company
donated more than $11,000 to Congressman Crenshaw's campaign and is owned by an
Indian-American named Chowdary Yalamanchili. Congressman Randy Weber
(District 14) voted for the legislation and received more than $13,000 over two
election cycles from the Azhar Chaudhary Law Firm — which specializes in H-1B
visas.
In addition to this,
there was a great deal of lobbying around this bill. The examples
of Crenshaw and Weber show that if you sorted through the maze of money around
direct donations, PAC money, and lobbyists, you would eventually find something
that could be seen as revealing a quid pro quo for every
congressman who voted for the legislation.
What was needed in this
case was for each congressman to explain why he feels the need to drastically
alter immigration policy in this manner. There was very little
debate on this legislation, and this is the single most revealing aspect of
it. For reasons that no one can really nail down, Congress feels the
need to alter immigration to heavily favor two nations in support of an
employment field that is already overcrowded and should be a staple of the
American middle class. The fact that they seemed to feel no need to
consult with the American people or explain this action reveals the true nature
of the relationship between Congress and the American people.
Winning: Companies Hire
Americans Instead of
Foreign Visa Workers
Americans Instead of
Foreign Visa Workers
AP
President Donald Trump’s
populist “Hire American” policy is forcing employers to hire more Americans at
higher wages, theWall Street Journal admits.
The pressure is highlighted by seasonal employers in Massachusetts
who were forced to hire Americans when Trump’s populist coalition stymied their
lobbying efforts to expand the use of H-2B foreign contract workers. According
to the Journal, which has long urged the large-scale use of
foreign workers:
“I have more Americans working than I’ve ever had,” says Josh
Aronie, executive chef at the Home Port Restaurant in the Vineyard fishing
village of Menemsha. He also reports his restaurant has been short of staff and
many of the workers he does have don’t know the basics of cooking or even how
to read the orders…
Nationwide data on the leisure and hospitality sector also shows a
tightening labor market. In June, average hourly earnings in the sector
increased 4% from a year earlier, according to government data analyzed by
Moody’s Analytics …
At the Home Port Restaurant in Menemsha, Mr. Aronie recalls
meeting with his small staff in a panic this June just a few days before the
scheduled opening. He had applied for 18 H-2B visa workers and received
none. Because
of the staffing crunch, the restaurant initially was open just five nights a
week, and didn’t open for lunch until late July. Mr. Aronie jokes about the
qualification he requires for hiring: “Are you breathing? Excellent.” He has
paid a premium to hire three people via a Boston-based temp agency.
Many seasonal employers prefer to hire H-2B workers instead of
Americans because those visa workers must stay with the company for the entire
season and must work at government-set hourly rates. Those lower rates for
seasonal workers also allow employers to pay lower rates to full-time,
year-round American staff.
Employers also prefer foreign workers because the current pool of
unemployed Americans includes many immature and untrained youths, unmotivated
adults on government aid programs, plus marginalized Americans, such as
inner-city youths and unemployed drug users who are the customers of the
Mexican drug cartels.
Amid pressure from donors, GOP leaders tried this year to expand
the H-2B program from roughly 115,000 H-2B workers up to roughly 200,000
resident H-2B workers. But the lobbyists and GOP leaders — including House
Speaker Paul Ryan — were largely
blockedby John Kelly when he was serving as the secretary of the
Department of Homeland Security. Kelly allowed only an extra 15,000 H-2B
workers, and promised to oppose any increase in 2018.
The public’s opposition to greater use of H-2B has also forced
employers in other states to recruit and pay Americans. The Journal reported:
In Alaska, Silver Bay Seafoods, a big user of the program,
received 31 H-2B visas this year for workers to help process salmon, down from
more than 900 in 2016. The company responded by spending more than $1 million
to recruit workers in 32 states, plus U.S. territories such as Puerto Rico and
the U.S. Virgin Islands.
“It’s very difficult to find people to do this work,” says Joe
Misenti, general counsel for Silver Bay. The company succeeded in hiring about
1,600 workers, replacing all of the foreign workers with Americans, counting
those from the U.S. territories.
Read it all here.
The same trend is visible in the agriculture sector, where the loss
of cheap illegal aliens is forcing employers to raise wages and also to
hire Americans to build and operate labor-saving farm machinery.
The result of the H-2B fight boosts the growing evidence that
young Americans will gain if the federal government reduces the annual inflow
of foreign temporary workers.
In 2016, for example, federal data shows that former President
Barack Obama gave federal “Employment Authorization Document” work permits
to at
least 2.3 million migrants for U.S. jobs, and approved visas for roughly 500,000
outsourcing workers, such as the H-1B white-collar workers, H-2B blue-collar
workers and H-2A agriculture workers. Those temporary workers were in addition
to the routine inflow of 1 million legal immigrants and roughly 400,000 illegal
immigrants.
The combined inflow delivered almost 4
million legal foreign workers to Americans’ economy in 2016, just as 4 million young
Americans turned 18 and began looking for decently paid jobs.
Many polls show that Americans
are very generous, they do welcome individual immigrants, and they do want to
like the idea of immigration. But the polls also show that most Americans are
increasingly worried that large-scale legal immigration will change their
country and disadvantage themselves and their children.
The current annual flood of foreign labor spikes profits and Wall Street
values by cutting salaries for manual and
skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives
up real estate prices, widens
wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’
schools and college education, and
sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their
families.
Video: Michelle Malkin Speaks at the Freedom Center
Who's really behind America's immigration crisis?
Mon Oct 21, 2019
Editor’s
note: Below are the video and transcript of Michelle Malkin's talk in
Beverly Hills for the David Horowitz Freedom Center on October 15th. She
discusses her latest book: Open Borders Inc.:
Who's Funding America's Destruction. Don't miss it!
Michelle Malkin from DHFC on Vimeo.
Transcript:
Michelle Malkin: As many of you may know, I cut my teeth and
started my newspaper journalism career in Southern California, in the
Valley. And I was just joking with a tablemate of mine that I literally
lived in a closet in Canoga Park in my early years. I was an editorial
writer and columnist for the Los Angeles Daily News. And so much of what
I observed, reported on, exposed in those early newbie years as a journalist,
colored the career that I've laid out for myself over the last 25-plus years.
And as many of you who are longtime Californians, native
Californians, know, everything that we're experiencing now with regard to open
borders and Open Borders, Inc. started here. This was ground zero.
And I had my journalistic antennae tuned to grassroots citizens in this state
who were the early warning sentinels, who were exposing and decrying the
fissures that were beginning to show in our civic culture -- the balkanization
of the school system, the impact of the open borders infrastructures Cloward-Piven
strategy, which David and the Center have for so long exposed, of completely
overwhelming our health, education, welfare, public safety and national
security systems.
I was here when Proposition 187 came into existence. And
that too was, I think, a prescient outbreak, revolt, of grassroots citizens
against Open Borders, Inc. And of course, over the last 25-plus years,
anytime that citizens have actually had a direct vote and referendum on
immigration matters, it is always in favor of sovereignty and against open
borders and Open Borders, Inc.
So I've described this latest book, this seventh book of mine,
"Open Borders, Inc.: Who's Funding America's Destruction?" as the
third in my Star Wars trilogy of books on immigration. And I was very
humbled to be able to talk about my first book, "Invasion," in 2002
at one of David's early gatherings. That book was fueled by my outrage in
the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. And I sought to document how
every lapse in immigration enforcement had paved the path for the 19 hijackers
who came in through the front door.
This is one of my biggest pet peeves, okay? So I will see a
lot of young people purporting to represent the Right and right-thinking
people, declaim that they are against illegal immigration and for legal
immigration. Can we graduate beyond this kindergarten level of expressing
our views and thoughts and analysis of immigration policy? All 19
hijackers came through the front door, the vast majority of them through the
Bush-created Visa Express program. That is a legal immigration
program. That is a legal means of getting into the country. I get
it. You are against people traipsing across the border illegally.
But are you for that? Are you for the Diversity Visa lottery program,
which has been the bane of our immigration system now for 20 years? We've
had Republicans promise over and over again to kill this program, which still
is preserved to this day, of randomly giving out the privilege of entering this
country.
How many of you are naturalized Americans yourself? Raise
your hands. Yes. Anyone come here through the Diversity Visa
lottery program? Handing out the privilege of coming into this country
randomly, like the lotto, is probably the most insane thing that I've heard any
sovereign country consider doing.
Many of you will remember that there was an attack at the El Al
counter at LAX in 2002. Hesham Hadayet. How to get into this
country randomly through the Diversity Visa lottery program. There are
countless examples of people who were not vetted properly, who did not offer
some sort of special skill or special fealty to our Western principles,
culture; who didn't have to demonstrate any type of willingness to assimilate
to American values, who've come through that legal pipeline into the country.
So "Invasion" connected the dots between our blind
tolerance for mass uncontrolled immigration to the 9/11 terrorist
attacks. And there's a scene I'll never forget. And I lived in the
Beltway swamp. This is the kind of refugee that I endorse, refugees from
the Beltway swamp. But when I was there, I would often have to do
business and work around the Fairfax County area. And after 9/11, I
visited the same 7-Eleven and DMVs that the 9/11 hijackers did, where they
hooked up with illegal alien day laborers who helped provide them with the
state IDs that helped them get onto the planes and board the planes that they
then drove into the Pentagon, the Twin Towers and Shanksville,
Pennsylvania. And you couldn't connect the dots any more clearly or
efficiently than that, allowing a swamp of upwards of 30 million illegal aliens
in the country, not just border trespassers and deportation evaders, but visa
overstayers. Forty percent of the people who are here illegally are visa
overstayers. And this is a lesson that 3,000 people sacrificed their
lives for America to learn. And we still refuse to learn it to this day.
So flash forward to the launch of "Open Borders, Inc."
and my book tour. I went back to the Beltway swamp, because it is an
occasional hazard. And I helped lead a rally to show support for
Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. As part of my book tour, I've
become a community organizer for America. We need more of those.
Right?
(Applause)
And put out a call for patriots and citizens in one of my other
former adopted home counties, Montgomery County, Maryland, which is ground zero
in the battle against extremist radical sanctuary policies that are endangering
America. And nearly a thousand people came out on our side. On our
side. This is a county where Soros organizations have held sway over an
extremist county council for years now, paving the way for MS-13 to hijack the
streets, hijack the schools.
And one of the lead organizations there, which you may be familiar
with, is a group called Casa de Maryland, directly subsidized by George Soros
-- tax exempt, nonprofit, previously led by the now chief of the Democratic
National Committee, Thomas Perez, which was one of the forerunners in the
amnesty movement, lobbying successfully for driver's licenses for illegal
aliens, in-state tuition discounts for so-called "dreamers," doing
everything that they can to obliterate the fundamental difference between legal
and illegal aliens.
And this group had a political arm, Casa in Action, that had
supported and given campaign donations to the Montgomery County Executive, Marc
Elrich. He showed up at the Stand With ICE rally on the other side, with
the amnesty mob, with people who were wearing Antifa T-shirts. And the
people on the other side, who I call sanctuary anarchists, outlaws, tried to
drown out an Angel Mom and an Angel Wife who talked about the bloody
consequences of open borders and how they had been permanently separated from
their family members because of this revolving door that benefits criminal
aliens.
Well, that night, I debated one of the leaders of Casa de
Maryland. And I started out by talking about how I had bought my first
house in Montgomery County, how my two children were raised in Montgomery
County, and how we used to be able to go to a local mall and play land and
local parks with our then baby and toddler and feel safe.
But in Germantown, where I had bought my house, multiple criminal
aliens had preyed upon young girls and teenagers, one an 11-year-old who was
gang raped by two criminals who had already been issued final orders of
deportation, after multiple encounters with the law. Another 16-year-old
girl was the victim of a home invasion robbery in Germantown, not far from
where I had raised my kids. Her suspected rapist had also been
apprehended multiple times at the border, issued an NTA, a notice to appear;
which really should be called an NTD, a notice to disappear. And the only
reason why these incidents became news and then national news, because I'm sure
-- raise your hand if you heard about this over the summer -- in the course of
one month, 10 of these suspects had finally been caught after going through the
revolving door.
Why do we know about them? Not because of the county.
The county doesn't keep statistics like that. They don't want to
know. No papers, no problems. The only reason we know about it is
because brave local police officers were so disgusted with sanctuary policies
that tied their hands behind their backs and gagged their mouths, and prevented
them from communicating and cooperating with federal immigration agents.
And so I laid this all out in this local debate on a DC TV station
with this smirking Soros minion sitting next to me. This was the week of
the 18th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks that we were debating.
And so I started talking about the nexus between mass uncontrolled immigration
and national security. And her response was to laugh. To laugh out
loud. And then, the so-called moderator -- moderator -- immoderator --
said, "That's a different topic," and interrupted me, and prevented
me from finishing the thought. We just keep hitting the snooze button and
indulging in this collective amnesia about what the fundamental lessons
should've been, that we should've learned and acted upon. Every September
11th, there are platitudes: never again, never forget. And then amnesia
sets in all over again.
The second in my Star Wars trilogy of immigration books shifted
focus to the economic impact on American workers. That book was called
"Sold Out," and it was coauthored with an incredible patriot, a
former American computer software programmer, who is now a lawyer who
represents the best and brightest American IT workers who've been negatively
affected by the H-1B visa program and other pipelines that have been
abused by big business, with its insatiable thirst for cheap foreign labor.
This book was initially prompted by my exasperation, on both sides
of the camera, of watching TV news segments try to explain the phenomenon of
these illegal alien caravans that have escalated under the Trump
Administration. So watching them, but also being on the other side of the
camera, and being asked a question and only having two minutes to answer, who's
funding this, who's behind it? And by the time I start my answer, the
segment is over.
So I sought to cram as much information in the middle of two
covers to answer that question, and to provide people with intellectual
ammunition -- uh-oh, I said ammunition, that's a trigger word. I said
trigger, that's a trigger word, too -- so that they have as much knowledge and
data and facts to counter the daily onslaught of Open Borders, Inc. propaganda.
I have sought over the course of my career to highlight the work
of so many independent investigators, think tanks, organizations like David's,
that have done the yeoman's work in this regard. A lot of the information
will not be necessarily new to you all. But I think what I did was take
all of the puzzle pieces and piece them together to paint, I think, as vivid a
picture as possible of how these hundreds of organizations and dozens of very
powerful CEOs and open borders philanthropists work in concert to sabotage our
borders and undermine our sovereignty.
People have asked me, "What was the most surprising thing
that you learned in the course of writing the book?" And I would
have to say that, looking from 14,000 feet -- and that is almost literal,
because I'm on my mountaintop in Colorado Springs -- what was most daunting was
documenting the billions of dollars of taxpayer subsidies that are underwriting
our own destruction and, along with that, the billions of dollars that people
may unwittingly and unknowingly be donating to charities and organizations that
they think are doing good for those communities.
And I'll start with the Catholic Church. I am a
Catholic. And I have long known about -- and I'm sure -- how many
Catholics in the room here, yes -- we all know about the social justice
hijacked wing of the Church. We've got this nightmare of a Pope who has
designated himself the global leader of the anti-Trump Resistance every single
day. We know about the radical ties between the bishops in Chicago and
Saul Alinsky himself. Much of the work that David's researchers have done
has illuminated this, the funding mechanism created by Saul Alinsky and Bernard
Sheil, the Chicago bishop, in the late '60s. That was the permanent
legacy of the community organizing wing of the U.S. Conference of Catholic
Bishops, the Industrial Areas Foundation.
And these groups have persisted decade after decade. During
the Bush years, they were at the forefront of organizing the illegal alien
marches that we saw, where the American flag was flown upside-down and replaced
with the Mexican flag. And the sort of militant and most grievance
mongering of the open borders protestors showed their faces before there was a
PR makeover. Right? Because, remember that, after the defeat, they
realized they needed to clean up, give everybody a little American flag and
stop talking about La Raza, and the borders crossed us, we didn't cross the
borders. Right? No more Reconquista talk for a little while.
But they can only hold it in for so long. Right?
And there was an outbreak of that as I was finishing up the manuscript
this summer for "Open Borders, Inc." in my adopted home state of
Colorado. At an ICE facility right outside of Denver, in Aurora,
Colorado, these Antifa and Abolish ICE forces laid siege to the grounds of the
facility. The police had been ordered to stand down. And the
American flag at the facility was torn down and replaced with a Mexican flag
and a defaced "Blue Lives Matter" flag.
Again, sort of looking at this from 14,000 feet, you can see the
natural progression of the cop bashing that David and so many of his
compatriots first exposed in the '60s and '70s. The Weather Underground,
the Black Liberation Army. They morphed into the MoveOn mob and the
Answer Coalition, the Soros funded organizations; whether it was ACORN morphing
into the Code Pink people. Then it became the Occupy movement. And
these were the people that were defecating on police cars in New York
City. And now, under Trump, it's the same people. You know, they
even have some of the same signs, targeting immigration enforcement now, and
physically intimidating and harassing 20,000-plus ICE agents across the
country.
There was an op-ed piece in the New York Times earlier this year
championing the doxing -- in other words, the revealing of the private
information -- of ICE agents and their families. And these are the people
who call us inciters to violence and hatred. In the book, I have a
screenshot of a tweet that was allowed to stand on Twitter for many days, that
was posted by Occupy Wall Street New York's chapter, graphically showing the
murder of an ICE agent and what illegal aliens should do if they encounter
them, basically garroting them.
This week, we had this hoo-hah about some meme video that was
shown at a conference at the Trump Doral Hotel. And yet, the same people
who are decrying that as some incitement to violence have had nothing to say
about the shots that have been fired at ICE facilities in San Antonio.
There was a protest at the house of the warden of the Aurora, Colorado
facility, where the Antifa mobsters threatened not only the warden and his
family but shouted at the "pigs" of the Aurora Police Department who
were there to protect the house and the neighborhood and told them to "go
home and swallow bullets."
Hardly a peep about what happened in Tacoma, Washington, at the
ICE facility there, where the paid Soros-Lite minions included an Antifa thug
who attempted to firebomb the building. Did you hear about that?
Not a peep.
There's one other huge factor in perpetuating these gross
caricatures of our ICE agents as somehow KKK or Nazis or SS guards; the most
noxious rhetoric aimed at them. And that is Hollywood itself.
Right? And here we are, in the land of high walls and bulletproof windows
and armed 24/7 guards. Many of the social justice groups have infiltrated
the Screenwriters' Guild. And they're weaving their open borders
ICE-bashing narratives into sitcoms and movies. And they are allowed to
advocate physical violence against ICE agents and then put a laugh track
underneath.
Some of you may remember, before it died a necessary death, the
revival of Murphy Brown in the past year. And for Thanksgiving, they had
an episode where there was an ICE raid that was going to target a family friend
who had a food truck. And Murphy Brown threatened to spatchcock the ICE
agents if they did their job. Any culinary folks here know what
spatchcocking is? Do you want to say what it means?
Unidentified Audience Member: [Inaudible]
Michelle Malkin: And crack it open.
Unidentified Audience Member: [Inaudible]
Michelle Malkin: Yes. For roasting. This is what they
wanted to do to ICE agents. And yet, this week, we've got this hue and
cry, and there's going to be op-eds out the wazoo about a meme of Trump.
But that's allowed.
The underwriting of that agenda in Hollywood, unfortunately,
doesn't just come from the Left. And I document in the book about the
Chrissy Teigens and John Legends of the world directing millions of dollars to
illegal alien propaganda groups. These are the same groups that are
taking cases on behalf of illegal aliens all the way up to the Supreme
Court. So, you know, I've told people outside of the Hollywood zone that
they should think twice about downloading another John Legend song.
Because you can defund Open Borders, Inc. in small ways in your own home.
It's easy not to give him money when you know where it's going.
And when people open up the newspapers every day and see that our
President's plenary powers are once again being stymied by these rogue judicial
sanctuary anarchists -- I mean, at least Antifa, they wear their black masks;
we know that they're the enemy. But it's the anarchists in black robes
who are doing so much more damage and causing so much more peril to our
country.
But it's not just the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. All
across this country, we have these judges who are issuing nationwide
injunctions from their lower court benches affecting the entire country and
throwing monkey wrenches into every aspect of immigration enforcement, whether
it's slamming shut the revolving door of the deportation abyss, trying to get a
handle on the asylum racket, stopping the "dreamer" scheme that
issued 800,000 work permits. That's what it's really about. It's
not about hopes and dreams; it's about work permits.
And the entire illegal alien lawyers lobby, of course, is
subsidized by both Soros and Hollywood and, again, our own tax dollars.
Pretty much every law school, public and private, in this country runs clinics
where they take their law school students down to the border to conduct Know
Your Rights seminars, where they're -- I mean, you wonder where they're cooking
up all of the fraudulent claims? It's at the Know Your Rights seminars.
So the Catholic Church, the Hollywood elite, the legal
infrastructure, and the deliberate overwhelming of every aspect of our system
-- if that wasn't enough -- and this is something that so many patriots have
faced over the years, but it's escalating now -- is that there's an
intersection between the war on our borders, the war on our sovereignty and the
war on free speech.
There is a chapter, that I think is especially important and
especially relevant to David's group and all of you who support him, on the
Southern Poverty Law Center. And of course, the SPLC has now infiltrated
the inner sanctums of Silicon Valley. And that is what's most daunting.
And I'll tell you, just from a personal perspective as somebody
who was an early adopter in the social media space, it seems so quaint now,
this idea, when I first started out on the internet in 1999. I mean, I
started a blog before "blog" was even a word. I used this
clunky program called Microsoft FrontPage to construct a website that took all
day to update, for just like a single paragraph. And when I talk to young
people, I say, "You don't understand what 2400 baud sounded
like." Remember that? And then, when it would finally finish,
"Yes! One new paragraph on the internet!" But the idea that you
could just plant your flag and never have to be concerned that the political or
ideological nature of your content would get your website pulled, those days
are over.
And as I was putting this manuscript to bed, one of the
researchers that I most admire, a solo practitioner named Ann Corcoran -- and
I'm saying it in the past tense -- had an incredible website called Refugee
Resettlement Watch. And this is an aspect of our failure to have a
rational immigration system that is very discriminating -- and yes, we can say
that word, discriminating -- this is one aspect that has been neglected until
recently. And she highlighted cases of fraud, cases of lack of community
input, subversion of local control.
You wonder how the Twin Cities became the Twin Cities? It
was because of the United Nations, Soros NGOs, and religious contractors.
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is a biggie. But in Minnesota, it was
the Lutheran Immigrant and Refugee Services. And when I've talked about
this, there are lot of conservative Lutherans who protest, they don't want to
hear it. Well, that's not our Senate; that's someone else's. Both
Senates, whether it's the conservative one or the more liberal ELCA, have
supported the work of the Lutheran Immigrant and Refugee Services, which is one
of the biggest profiteers in the refugee resettlement space.
And Ann Corcoran had been reporting on this for upwards of 10
years and woke up one morning earlier this summer to find that WordPress, which
is the blogging software that she uses -- and that I use, by the way -- had
determined that her work had violated some community guidelines or
standards. There's no appellate process, and she has spent the last
several months trying to rebuild 10 years' worth of reporting on this racket.
So I finished this book with a special sense of urgency.
Because the tactics of the SPLC, which named Ann Corcoran one of its agents of
hate, along with me and David, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Ben Carson -- these are
the groups that have labeled me a white supremacist.
(Laughter)
I'm not doing a very good job of it, am I? They're the same
groups that have attacked me since the launch of the book as -- yes, and I know
many of you have also borne these slings and arrows and chuckled about it -- an
anti-Semite. I am married to the grandson of Ukrainian Jews.
Doesn't matter. They have gotten away with slapping these defamatory
labels on peaceful patriotic citizens for decades. You would've thought,
after the internal crumbling of the SPLC in the past year, whistleblowers
coming out of the woodworks to talk about sexual harassment, racial harassment,
Morris Dees finally slinking away -- even many left-wing publications and
reporters talking about the fraud of the poverty palace. And within weeks
of that scandal finally blowing up, there was the New York Times and the
Washington Post reverting back to form, quoting the SPLC as the absolute moral
authority on who's a hater, who's a xenophobe, who's a racist.
When is this going to stop? After the House Republicans,
when they were in power, defunded ACORN, didn't you have a sense of hope?
All right! We're just getting started! What happened? ACORN reconstituted
itself into five different other community organizations that still do their
work. Many of these groups are going to be getting money to conduct the
census. We continue to subsidize our own destruction. And these
establishment Republicans in the swamp have allowed it to happen. They've
enabled it either by default, by neglect or, unfortunately -- and this has been
a theme of so much of my work over the last 25-plus years, and it's a note I'll
end on now -- too many of these Republicans themselves are charter members of
Open Borders, Inc. who are lining their own pockets.
Some of you might've seen a speech that I did at CPAC earlier this
year. Anybody? Thank you. You can watch it on YouTube if you
haven't seen it yet. But I was disgusted by the fact that after two days
into the conference, only 13 minutes total had been spent on the most important
existential issue of our time. And that is, it's not just immigration.
It is the right of self-determination of any country to decide who gets in, how
many; and what we do when we detect people who don't belong here in the first
place.
And the numbers are everything. The numbers are
everything. It's not just the 30 million who may be here illegally, and
that's probably a lowball figure. It's the one million new green cards
that we issue every year. It's the overwhelming that I've talked about,
the 700,000 visa overstayers, the half million deportation evaders; and then
all of these legal pipelines which are being exploited to the detriment of
American citizens, American families and American workers.
And I gave the speech. And I pointed out that the organizers
of CPAC itself had allowed people to come inside their tent who have targeted
many of the patriots who've warned about our problems. Van Jones got to
cuddle up to Matt Schlapp onstage at CPAC. Van Jones, who has been one of
the most active hit men of the Soros-funded Left. And yet, many
nationalist patriots were banned from even entering the ballroom to listen to
my speech. There's something wrong with that kind of enterprise which has
been converted into a pay-for-play system for Open Borders, Inc.
I tell a story in the preface of the book about how after I
finished my speech, I had to go backstage to get out of the venue. And I
was stopped by a couple of people who thanked me for my speech. Then
there were people who sort of avoided me. And then there were the
clueless, three-piece-suited lobbyists who came up to me. And remember
what I said at the beginning about this platitude of "I'm against illegal,
I'm for legal." So a lobbyist comes up to me. Says, "Oh,
I really appreciated what you had to say." Hadn't listened to me.
"I'm against illegal immigration, too. But here's my business
card. We really ought to talk about how you can support expansion of the
H-2 program for seasonal workers." Low-wage foreign workers.
Did you not hear anything I just said?
This is the Beltway mentality. This is what we face.
Because these people are inside the tent. And I will say it again --
fragging from inside the tent is so much more dangerous than the bombs and
grenades that are lobbied from outside. And that is not a comfortable
message. It's definitely not one that I'm going on Fox News to talk about
a lot, although I'm happy to, if anyone wants me to.
But going forward, I think, especially as we head into this deep
plunge of an election cycle, it's easy to make fun of the clown car of the
Democratic presidential candidates. That's easy. What's harder is
to combat the people from inside the tent that are sabotaging the best
opportunities we have to seize back control of our country. We've got
good people in the West Wing. They're the ones who are revamping the
Refugee Resettlement program who are doing everything they can do in their
power to fight back against judicial anarchy and reclaim the powers of the
President over immigration policy.
The last platitude that just gets on my nerves is that our laws
are broken. Our laws are not broken. Our will to enforce them is.
(Applause)
I will stop here, because I think I am going to answer questions?
Unidentified Participant: Yes.
Michelle Malkin: And I appreciate your time. Thank you.
(Applause)
Yes?
Unidentified Audience Member: [Inaudible]
Unidentified Participant: Wait. We've got the mic.
I'll come to you next. But we'll start here, and then I'll come over.
Michelle Malkin: Yes, ma'am?
Unidentified Audience Member: I'm going to assume that Trump takes
back the House and the Senate. What can we expect on immigration,
assuming that?
Michelle Malkin: It depends on who we're sending to the House and
the Senate. And what I have seen over the last couple of years,
unfortunately, are groups funded, for example, by the open borders Libertarians
-- the Koch Foundation, for example -- to combat patriots that would be sent to
Washington to help provide ground troops and support for President Trump.
There was a race up in Northern California where a longtime grassroots
immigration enforcement hawk, Tim Donnelly, was going up against a Never
Trumper moderate. And for some reason, forces in the White House
convinced Trump to endorse the guy who hated him instead of the guy who
supported him.
And so when you have this open borders, Never Trump faction that
does things like what 11 Republican senators did in the last couple of weeks --
two weeks ago, you might've seen the headlines -- 11 GOP senators voted against
the emergency declaration at the border that was supported by President
Trump. If we keep sending people like that back to the House and Senate,
what's the point?
Unidentified Audience Member: Yeah. I know you didn't quite
-- there's kind of an elephant in the living room that I don't know if you
really talk about in your book or not, but it's human trafficking, like the sex
trafficking. I mean, that's what's really kind of behind this is the mass
enslavement of these people that is even -- you know, because, like I said,
they're being brought as a permanent basically slave class to vote in and
destroy this country, like is being done throughout Europe. I don't know
how much you discuss that. But that seems kind of the elephant in the
living room I wanted to say.
Michelle Malkin: Yeah. Chapter one, which is called,
"Sin Fronteras: All Aboard The Caravan Cartel," talks about the
misery that is enabled and induced by people who hide behind the compassion
curtain. And that includes many of the Catholic organizations that stand
up all of these illegal alien shelters, from Central America all the way up
through Mexico and into the interior of our country. I mean, the
inducements that they are creating, the pull factors, the magnets, of illegal
alien family, parents, who are paying coyotes to drag their underage girls, who
are then subjected to the worst kind of abuse. And then, the coyotes, who
pay the drug cartels derecho de piso to get across the finish line into the
country. And at some point, there needs to be some sort of journalistic
and political and ideological jujitsu to turn the table of that narrative that
we're the ones that don't care, that we don't care about human rights, that we
don't care about women.
And I think the Montgomery County, Maryland example was a perfect
opportunity to do that, to put that laser focus on the fact that most of the
victims of these criminal aliens going through the revolving door are
themselves members of these illegal alien communities.
Unidentified Participant: We'll go here. And then, Carl,
you're next.
Unidentified Audience Member: Yeah. You're one of the good
naturalized citizens in this country. So the country needs people like
you and other naturalized citizens that are contributing greatly to our economy
and to our country. How would you design an immigration policy that
attracts those people that are going to benefit the country in a manner that
gets our economy going forward, as opposed to just getting people who are here
to undermine our country?
Michelle Malkin: So just to refresh a little bit about my own
personal background -- my parents came here legally from the Philippines in
1970. They had to know English fluently before they even stepped foot on
American soil. They had to pay all of their medical fees and undergo
medical screening. I was born here. And my father was a
neonatologist at a time when that specialty was really just coming into the
fore. And so he had to demonstrate an extreme benefit to the country,
because there weren't many people who were involved in his specialty. And
he was at the Johns Hopkins University with one of the godfathers of
neonatology and then ran the NICU unit at the Atlantic City Medical Center for
almost 30 years.
My mom was a public schoolteacher and taught everything from
so-called bilingual education -- and of course, those of you in California know
why I say "so-called" bilingual education, right? Because it's
really native language maintenance that helps school districts collect a $2,000
per pupil fee. That was a shock to my mom, a revelation. She was
outraged to learn that she was participating in that and stopped doing
it. Because she knew, even in her own life, of course, that English is
the language of success. Of course, that's a trigger, you're not allowed
to say that, either.
And so both of my parents, by virtue of their own educational
background and work skills, demonstrated that they were not going to be public
charges in America. And of course, we've got all of these left-wing
groups suing over that reform by President Trump.
What does an ideal immigration system look like? Well, we
can't know until we have what I have advocated since I came out with
"Invasion" in 2002, a complete immigration moratorium. We need
to take a breather.
(Applause)
Then we can systematically go through every single aspect, both
physical control of our land, sea and air ports of entry. We have to look
at the consular offices overseas and what they're doing to vet people who are
applying for short-term visas and green cards. Every single program --
and I've documented this in my entire trilogy -- has been overwhelmed.
There is no control. We have to reassert control.
And then, that of course includes thinking about the magnets that
are drawing people here to break our laws. That includes rethinking
birthright citizenship. And it means ditching chain migration. And
then, when it comes to elevating special skills, we have to be very vigilant
and make sure that we are not shortchanging American workers. Because the
H-1B program is proof of concept that, even if you have special skills as your
criteria, it is being abused and sabotaged by big business forces.
Unidentified Participant: We're going to do two more
questions. Carl, and then we'll see about the last one.
Unidentified Audience Member: Yeah. Ms. Malkin, in your
discussion, you mentioned the New York Times twice. A couple of weeks
ago, the New York Times came out with a publication that said the United States
as a nation didn't start with the pilgrims in 1620 or with the Declaration of
Independence in 1776; but in 1619, when 20 or 40 black slaves were imported
into Jamestown. Which means that the United States is fundamentally a
racist, white supremacist nation that has no right to any sovereignty, has no
right to make any borders. Could you comment on that?
Michelle Malkin: Yes.
So that curriculum now will be spread in thousands of
government-run school districts across the country. And it is merely a
supplement to all of the sovereignty undermining propaganda that has
metastasized in the school system for the last 30 years. Think about
that. And couple it with the fact -- and I report on this in the book --
that the SPLC has a curriculum called -- and they always have the most
brilliant and anodyne sounding names -- Teaching Tolerance. Teaching
Tolerance. This is in 10,000 school districts. And what they're
doing with that curriculum is obliterating the difference, again, between legal
and illegal immigration. They teach the children how to be junior
lobbyist for the illegal alien dreamer agenda. And they teach the
kindergarteners how to draw signs that say, "migration is beautiful"
and "no human being is illegal." Everything starts in K through
12.
And that is my warning to -- I understand that we absolutely have
to focus on all of the craziness and the orthodoxies that have infested higher
education. But I think the mistake is that we haven't paid nearly enough
attention to what's going on in K through 12.
My friend, Brigitte Gabriel, who has an organization, Act for
America, did an analysis of middle school textbooks and how they are
whitewashing violent jihad in their propagandizing about radical Islam.
When you've got the teachers' unions, who put "Rules for Radicals" as
the number-one book on their teachers' reaching list, we've ceded the game
right there.
And again, I practice what I preach. I homeschooled, with my
husband, my youngest child for five years. And I think that's probably
the best immunization. That's the one kind of vaccine I support these
days is the vaccine against liberal virus, right? But it goes to show you
that we have to pay attention down-ballot as well. And that's something
that's not going to get on the Drudge Report or Fox News. But I absolutely
support more people, like the people in this room, running for school boards
across the country.
Unidentified Participant: Okay. Brent's going to get the
last question. But before that, Michelle is going to sign books at the
table in the back of the room here. And we still have books for sale out
by the registration.
Unidentified Audience Member: Hello. God bless you,
Michelle.
(Applause)
Michelle Malkin: Thank you, appreciate that.
Unidentified Audience Member: You are what I call one of the
modern American matriarchs and the authentic feminists. With the
situation with the viciousness of the Cloward-Piven invasion, euphemistically
called immigration, what is it that women don't realize? And how can they
be spoken to to recognize they are the direct victims of this fraud?
Michelle Malkin: I need to think about how to answer that.
Because, you know, I've done this for a long time. And I had the passion
to expose radical open borders ideology early on in my career because I
understood what a privilege it was for my parents to come here. And they
always inculcated that in me. And, you know, you hear this word
"privilege" bandied about now as if it's some sort of
expletive. And the problem isn't that we should apologize for privilege;
it's that we should be grateful for it.
And then, when I had my own kids, the nature of my passion
changed. Because I thought about what my parents were able to bestow on
my brother and me. And the urgency of writing "Invasion," and
the thousands of columns and blog posts that I've done over the years, was
fueled by my desire to leave a better place for my own children. And
that's obviously what binds us all together as fellow American citizens is that
we want to preserve and protect the American dream for ourselves and our
posterity.
And for so many addled left-wing women not to see that they are
cheating themselves and their futures, it alarms me to no end. And again,
I just want to come back to the fact that it's women who are paying the most
attention to what goes on in the classroom. And it's women who need to
take more responsibility for inculcating in their children this sense of
gratitude that I'm talking about.
When I look at the faces of the congressional brat pack, and
Alexandria Open Borders --
(Laughter)
-- and how vile and ugly that hatred they have for the blessings
that we enjoy every day, I know that I'm going to be in this fight for a long
time. And I know you will be, too.
Thank you.
(Applause)
No comments:
Post a Comment