The
Left and the Democratic Party are now so committed to open borders and illegal
immigration that they cannot reverse course without a major upheaval within
their ranks. Do they really give a damn about the African American population,
native born or naturalized Hispanics, and the low-income white working
families? Or, are the potential votes of the illegal population more
important? With the spending plans outlined above how will they buy off
these groups as there will be no money or jobs? How will they avoid the
inevitable friction and potential hostility with so many in the marketplace and
a limited number of jobs in the low-income sector?
Democrats turning California into
a third-world hellhole: Going without electricity edition
Democrats are turning California into a third-world hellhole
without electricity, water, and freedom.
Due to Democrats' love for trees, at least 800,000 Californians
will be without power for several days. Instead of properly managing
California forests to reduce the chances of big fires, Democrats are saying
Californians have to go without lights, refrigerators, and
air-conditioning. Democrats could also avoid this by not making the
power company financially liable for all forest fire damages, but since
PG&E is a company, not an illegal alien, the Democrats couldn't care less
about doing what's best for California.
While they try to blame climate change and the infrastructure, the
reality is that neither of those has caused any significant changes in the last
ten years — but now, suddenly, due to Democrat policies, Californians have to
start living in the 18th century.
The Democrats who run California also refuse to build more water
storage capacity even though the state's population has dramatically increased,
ensuring that water has to be rationed during droughts.
Democrats are turning California into a third-world country
economically. The income inequality between the über-rich Silicon
Valley workers and the rest of Californians is huge, just like in third-world
countries, while the elites live in luxury and the rest live in squalor.
Democrats are doing a great job manufacturing poverty and
homelessness even as they fail to instill hope in Californians.
California has four times more homeless per capita and three times more poor per
capita than the rest of America. Half the homeless in America are in
California, even though California has only 12% of the U.S.
population. Also, blacks are six times more prevalent in the San Francisco homeless population than they
are in California in general.
The homeless explosion has brought the return of third-world
diseases like typhus to California — not to mention streets littered with human
feces.
Democrats are trying to keep people from having cars, just like
the people of the Third World. After all, a car gives people the
freedom to move, and freedom is a bad thing in the minds of Democrats since it
limits the power the government has over citizens.
Recently, Gavin Newsom, the Democrat governor, transferred
millions of dollars that the voters had been ensured would go to improve the
state's failing road infrastructure to a fund designed to convince Californians
to give up their cars.
Democrats are also working to make cars unaffordable for any but
the richest Californians.
Californians pay $1.53 more for a gallon for gasoline than the rest of
America. That's $21 more for a tank of gasoline. Facebook
employees won't notice it, but the poor in California who can't afford to live
near their jobs are paying through the teeth.
Like all third-world tyrants, Democrats are doing everything they
can to eliminate democracy in California.
The jungle primary, where the top two candidates in the primaries
go against each other, has resulted in many races where two Democrats are
running against each other, giving voters who don't agree with the Democrats'
failed policies no one to vote for.
California is doing nothing to ensure that people who shouldn't
vote don't vote. Instead, the people running the state are doing
everything possible to let illegal aliens vote. When illegal aliens
go pick up their driver's licenses, they're automatically enrolled to vote
unless they say they're not citizens.
California is also trying to end democracy by keeping the
Republican presidential candidate off the ballot. Democrats passed
an unconstitutional law to keep any candidate who didn't release his tax
returns off the ballot solely to keep Californians from voting for Trump.
Finally, the Democrats are going after freedom of the
press. An undercover journalist revealed that Planned Parenthood was
selling aborted baby parts. Instead of investigating that illegal
practice, Democrat Kamala Harris decided to put the journalist on trial.
Democrats keep telling us California is the future if they get
elected. That means that poverty, homelessness, the end of
democracy, and a press that reports only what Democrats want heard are what
Democrats are promising us.
If you're an immensely wealthy Google employee, California is
Heaven. If you're not, it's becoming more and more like Hell.
You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations
about the obvious, and feel free to follow him on Twitter.
Google Bans Confederate Flag, Celebrates Communists
The
Left and the Democratic Party are now so committed to open borders and illegal
immigration that they cannot reverse course without a major upheaval within
their ranks. Do they really give a damn about the African American population,
native born or naturalized Hispanics, and the low-income white working
families? Or, are the potential votes of the illegal population more
important? With the spending plans outlined above how will they buy off
these groups as there will be no money or jobs? How will they avoid the
inevitable friction and potential hostility with so many in the marketplace and
a limited number of jobs in the low-income sector?
Democrats turning California into
a third-world hellhole: Going without electricity edition
Democrats are turning California into a third-world hellhole
without electricity, water, and freedom.
Due to Democrats' love for trees, at least 800,000 Californians
will be without power for several days. Instead of properly managing
California forests to reduce the chances of big fires, Democrats are saying
Californians have to go without lights, refrigerators, and
air-conditioning. Democrats could also avoid this by not making the
power company financially liable for all forest fire damages, but since
PG&E is a company, not an illegal alien, the Democrats couldn't care less
about doing what's best for California.
While they try to blame climate change and the infrastructure, the
reality is that neither of those has caused any significant changes in the last
ten years — but now, suddenly, due to Democrat policies, Californians have to
start living in the 18th century.
The Democrats who run California also refuse to build more water
storage capacity even though the state's population has dramatically increased,
ensuring that water has to be rationed during droughts.
Democrats are turning California into a third-world country
economically. The income inequality between the über-rich Silicon
Valley workers and the rest of Californians is huge, just like in third-world
countries, while the elites live in luxury and the rest live in squalor.
Democrats are doing a great job manufacturing poverty and
homelessness even as they fail to instill hope in Californians.
California has four times more homeless per capita and three times more poor per
capita than the rest of America. Half the homeless in America are in
California, even though California has only 12% of the U.S.
population. Also, blacks are six times more prevalent in the San Francisco homeless population than they
are in California in general.
The homeless explosion has brought the return of third-world
diseases like typhus to California — not to mention streets littered with human
feces.
Democrats are trying to keep people from having cars, just like
the people of the Third World. After all, a car gives people the
freedom to move, and freedom is a bad thing in the minds of Democrats since it
limits the power the government has over citizens.
Recently, Gavin Newsom, the Democrat governor, transferred
millions of dollars that the voters had been ensured would go to improve the
state's failing road infrastructure to a fund designed to convince Californians
to give up their cars.
Democrats are also working to make cars unaffordable for any but
the richest Californians.
Californians pay $1.53 more for a gallon for gasoline than the rest of
America. That's $21 more for a tank of gasoline. Facebook
employees won't notice it, but the poor in California who can't afford to live
near their jobs are paying through the teeth.
Like all third-world tyrants, Democrats are doing everything they
can to eliminate democracy in California.
The jungle primary, where the top two candidates in the primaries
go against each other, has resulted in many races where two Democrats are
running against each other, giving voters who don't agree with the Democrats'
failed policies no one to vote for.
California is doing nothing to ensure that people who shouldn't
vote don't vote. Instead, the people running the state are doing
everything possible to let illegal aliens vote. When illegal aliens
go pick up their driver's licenses, they're automatically enrolled to vote
unless they say they're not citizens.
California is also trying to end democracy by keeping the
Republican presidential candidate off the ballot. Democrats passed
an unconstitutional law to keep any candidate who didn't release his tax
returns off the ballot solely to keep Californians from voting for Trump.
Finally, the Democrats are going after freedom of the
press. An undercover journalist revealed that Planned Parenthood was
selling aborted baby parts. Instead of investigating that illegal
practice, Democrat Kamala Harris decided to put the journalist on trial.
Democrats keep telling us California is the future if they get
elected. That means that poverty, homelessness, the end of
democracy, and a press that reports only what Democrats want heard are what
Democrats are promising us.
If you're an immensely wealthy Google employee, California is
Heaven. If you're not, it's becoming more and more like Hell.
You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations
about the obvious, and feel free to follow him on Twitter.
Google would never feature Nazi sympathizers on its site. It very prominently pulled the Confederate flag from its shopping site. Communists though are cool. Every lefty knows that.
And so its list of "Latino Trailblazers" includes Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo, terrible artists and worse human beings.
The Google bio states, "Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera are considered among the greatest Mexican artists. Kahlo is best known for her bold, self-portraits and paintings and Rivera for his large, vibrant frescoes and murals. The married couple famously lived together in Casa Azul, two houses connected by a rooftop bridge in Mexico City."
That's like describing Adolf Hitler as an Austrian housepainter. It's not exactly the whole story.
For Frida Kahlo, along with Diego Rivera, was a lifelong and pointedly unapologetic left-wing radical and, at various intervals, member of Mexico’s Communist party. One of her last works, Self Portrait with Stalin (1954), depicts the recently deceased Soviet dictator with the artist modestly arrayed in the foreground. So close, in fact, was Kahlo’s identification with communism and so resolute her devotion to Stalin that in 1940 she was briefly suspected by Mexican authorities of complicity in the murder (in Coyoacán near Mexico City) of Stalin’s nemesis Leon Trotsky, whose assassin she knew.
And Kahlo had an affair with Trotsky. Making the whole story even uglier.
Diego Rivera broke with Stalin over, in part, his alliance with Hitler. He may have even become an FBI informant. Kahlo was made of sterner stuff and proved willing to denounce her 'husband' and Trotsky.
Both were Communists. If they hadn't been, it's doubtful that lefties would still be celebrating their ugly bad art.
There's been pushback from Trump's ambassador to Mexico.
U.S. Ambassador Christopher Landau, who was appointed by President Donald Trump and sworn in last month, must navigate a volatile bilateral relationship."I admire her free and bohemian spirit, and she rightly became an icon of Mexico around the whole world. What I do not understand is her obvious passion for Marxism, Leninism, Stalinism. Didn't she know about the horrors committed in the name of that ideology?" he wrote in Spanish.
Of course the media spins criticising an ideology responsible for the mass murder of millions as "offensive."
The Mexican Communist Party weighed into the debate, saying: "Ambassador Landau, Comrade Frida was consistent with humanism, the search for democracy and freedom of Mexico's workers and people, and therefore she was a Marxist-Leninist, and of course Stalin's admirer. Don't show your ignorance anymore, imitating Trump."
Remember, this is what they are.
And Google, which controls the internet, is fine with Stalinism. No Confederate flags allowed, Comrade. But red ones are fine.
Can the Democratic Party Govern America?
I recently had a lunch meeting with a
client of 25 years who is a lifelong member and financial supporter of the
Democratic Party. While we managed to avoid politics as best we could,
the inevitable subject of Donald Trump and the Democratic presidential field
reared its head. Once my friend got past the usual left-wing
talking points about Trump, I asked him a simple question. Given the
current state of the American Left and their domination of the Democratic Party
would the Democrats be able to govern a nation of 330 million people the size
of the continent of Europe if they assumed all the reins of power in Washington
D.C.? I was met with a blank stare and a stammered “I really don’t know.”
So, for the benefit of my friend and
his fellow Democrats and leftists some further questions to help them answer
that fundamental inquiry.
This same cabal that would be charged
with governing the nation has, for the past three and a half years,
marginalized, physically confronted and repeatedly accused 63 million Americans
who voted for Donald Trump of being not only racists but fascists and white
supremacists, as well as homophobic, xenophobic and among the most vile people
on the face of the earth. What will be their intentions for these
rightfully incensed citizens? Ignore them and hope they go away (which
they will not)? Or succumb to their base in order to stay in power and
continue to vilify nearly half of the voters in 2020, thus potentially fomenting
serious ongoing confrontations and retaliation.
Over the years 154 million fundamentalist, evangelical or
Catholic Christians have been denigrated, mocked and pilloried for their
beliefs as religious liberty is under continual assault by the Left and the
Democratic Party. What can this segment of society look forward to under
a government committed to promoting unfettered abortion and infanticide as well
as a determination to purge society of its basic Judeo-Christian
foundation? It is almost certain that the hierarchy of the party, in
order to placate their base, will continue, by litigation, administrative
decrees, and intimidation, to force their secularism on the nation.
How will they respond to what will be increasing anger and resentment by
48% of the population?
In a nation of 330 million people
there will always be those who will commit mass murder. When and if the
current iteration of the Democratic Party takes over, these occurrences will
increase. The left has always blamed rhetoric and guns as the primary
causation. Thus, when mass murders occur, a Democratic Party in power
will have no choice but to appease their left-wing voters (the bulk of their
base) and continue to ignore underlying factors such as societal breakdown and
mental illness and actively focus on limiting speech and gun control.
Currently 235 million Americans either own or could see
themselves owning a gun. How will the Democrats in power go about confiscating
guns in a nation of 3.8 million square miles? Utilize a national registry
of all gun owners? Outlaw all semi-automatic weapons? Impose
onerous taxes and insurance requirements making gun ownership unaffordable?
Pass open-ended red flag laws allowing virtually anyone to file a
complaint against someone, ostensibly based in their suspicions, thus allowing
the police to seize the guns of the accused? As for speech, will certain
words, phrases and organizations, as determined by the Left, be considered
inciteful and dangerous and thus outlawed? How will the Democrats deal
with the inevitable resistance and potential violent pushback from upwards of
72% of the nation’s citizenry?
Once in power, the Democrats are
committed to Medicare for all, reparations for African Americans, and new
environmental programs amid a myriad of spending programs. The estimated
average annual cost of these proposals exceeds $6 Trillion over and above
current spending. At present the federal government spends $4.7 Trillion
(which includes $1 Trillion of deficit spending). Income taxes account for 50% of all government revenue
and Social Security and Medicare withholding account for 36%. Thus,
individuals account for 86% of all revenue. In order for the Democrats to
pay for these programs, revenue from individual taxpayers would have to be
increased by 200%.
As the Democrats have promised not to
touch Social Security and Medicare withholding, all the increase would have to
be in the income tax arena. Based on the most recent IRS analysis the effective average income
tax rate would have to be 80% on the top 10% of income tax filers, a rate of
65% on the next 40%, and a rate of 40% on the bottom 50% of filers. This does
not include Social Security and Medicare withholding of another 8 to 12
percentage points plus an average state income tax rate of 8.5 percentage
points. Further, the corporate tax rate would have to be increased from a
current rate of 21% to 60%.
How would the Democrats enforce these
new rates as people either refuse to pay or go into the underground
economy? How would they pay for massive unemployment and welfare
benefits as a result of an avalanche of layoffs and business closures?
What are their plans for the recession and potential depression that would
ensue? From whom would the government borrow money and at what exorbitant
interest rate? Would they successfully coerce the Federal Reserve into printing
trillions of dollars in new money creating massive uncontrolled inflation?
On the other hand, if they do not
initiate some if not all of these programs, how do they placate their base and
voters without blaming it on the other side as they are wont to do -- thus
further antagonizing and pitting segments of society against each other.
Recently the Democratic Party has
become the party of open borders and amnesty as well as ultimate citizenship
for upwards of 22 million illegal immigrants and with
open borders at least another 2-4 million more every year. The vast
majority of these illegal immigrants are functionally illiterate and lacking in
employable skills.
Currently 30% of all working families
(or nearly 50 million Americans) are essentially unskilled and low income but
above the poverty threshold. 60% of these are families headed by racial/ ethnic minorities. African-Americans, while 13%
of the population (41 million), account for nearly 30% of low income working
families. Another 39 million Americans live below the poverty level.
Thus, a total of 89 million live in low-income families or in
poverty. Yet the Democratic Party, that claims to be the champion of
minorities and low-income families, is pushing to ultimately legalize upwards
of 22 to 30 million unskilled illegal immigrants (equal to 55 to 73% of the
current African American population) which will devastate low income working
American families.
The Left and the
Democratic Party are now so committed to open borders and illegal immigration
that they cannot reverse course without a major upheaval within their
ranks. Do they really give a damn about the African American population,
native born or naturalized Hispanics, and the low-income white working
families? Or, are the potential votes of the illegal population more
important? With the spending plans outlined above how will they buy off
these groups as there will be no money or jobs? How will they avoid the
inevitable friction and potential hostility with so many in the marketplace and
a limited number of jobs in the low-income sector?
In summary, while the
current American Left dominated Democratic Party and its propaganda arm, the
mainstream media, may be good at sowing confusion, communicating overt
falsehoods and vilifying their opponents in order to win elections, they cannot
and will never be able to successfully govern a nation of 330 million people
the size of the continent of Europe. If they ever fully control all the levers of
power, this nation will, in due course, cease to exist.
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.),
Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) speak at a press
conference at the U.S. Capitol on July 15, 2019. (Holly Kellum/NTD)
Marxists Work to Reinforce
‘The Squad’ in 2020
August 19, 2019 Updated: August 19, 2019
Share
Commentary
Not content with Reps. Rashida Tlaib,
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , Ilhan Omar, and Ayanna Pressley—the far-left congresswomen
collectively known as “The Squad”—the
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and allied Marxist groups are targeting
multiple congressional seats with far-left candidates in 2020.
No one is safe. The DSA and its pro-China
allies, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) and Liberation Road (formerly Freedom
Road Socialist Organization, or FRSO), are targeting dozens of seats currently
held by Republicans, moderate Democrats, and even by insufficiently Marxist
members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. Most will not make it past the
primaries, but some have at least a reasonable chance of being elected.
Here are four serious far-left contenders
who could be reinforcing “The Squad” in January 2021.
Cori Bush
Cori Bush is targeting Missouri’s 1st Congressional District, which
encompasses St. Louis, Florissant, and Ferguson. Her Democratic primary
opponent is William Lacy Clay Jr., a veteran of both the Congressional
Progressive Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus, who has represented the
district since 2001, succeeding his father William Lacy Clay Sr. In 2018, Bush
stood against Clay Jr., losing by about 20 percentage points.
A native of St. Louis, Bush is a registered
nurse, an ordained pastor, an activist, and a “community organizer.” She first
came to prominence during the Ferguson anti-police protests of 2014, where she played
a significant, if largely covert, role.
During a BlogTalkRadio
show broadcast in August 2015, Bush was
reporting “on the ground” as she described the scene days after “shots rang
out” in Ferguson: “I’m right on the ground. I’m right here in the middle
of it, so there’s chanting behind me. As a matter of fact, I was riding in a
car … circling the neighborhood with flags and with our masks on.”
Prominent in the activist community, Bush
was a recipient of the 2015 “Woman of Courage” Award from the Emmett Till
Legacy Foundation and the 2016 Delux Magazine “Power 100” Award, according to
her website. She was named one of the ‘Top 50 Women of St. Louis” by Gazelle
Magazine, and an “Unsung Human Rights Hero” by the St. Louis Coalition for
Human Rights in 2017. She also received the 2018 “Community Activist” award
from the Missouri Association of Black Ministers. In 2017, she was elected the
first vice-chairperson of the Missouri Democratic Party Progressive Caucus.
District 1 is heavily Democratic, so if
Bush can manage to beat Clay Jr., she will almost certainly win the seat.
Working in her favor is her close
connection to two of Missouri’s most influential Marxist groups: St. Louis DSA
and the local CPUSA. These groups can muster nearly 1,000 activists and have
already elected many local officials, including several state representatives.
Early this year, St. Louis Communist Party leader Tony Pecinovsky (supported by Bush and running as a Democrat) lost a race for St.
Louis Board of Aldermen Ward 14 with a respectable 48 percent of the vote.
Bush is a regular at the local Communist
Party HQ—the St. Louis Workers Educational Society. During her 2018 campaign,
Bush celebrated her birthday at an event in St Louis. Guest speakers included
DSA member Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
In July 2017, Bush joined a Sit-In to Save
Health Care at Republican Sen. Roy Blunt’s office in Clayton, Missouri. Bush
was joined by members of the St. Louis DSA, Socialist Alternative, and the St.
Louis Workers’ Education Society.
Bush already has the endorsement of Justice
Democrats—famous for selecting and electing Ocasio-Cortez in 2016.
Albert Lee
Albert Lee is targeting Oregon’s 3rd Congressional District, which
encompasses all of deep blue Portland. The very safe Democrat district has been
held since 1996 by Earl
Blumenauer, a long-time member of the Congressional
Progressive Caucus. Blumenauer beat his last Republican opponent 73 percent to
20 percent, so if Lee can win the primary, he’s almost guaranteed a seat in
Congress.
Lee is currently the Dean for Business and
Computing at the Sylvania Campus of Portland Community College.
He is active in TriMet’s Transit Equity
Advisory Committee, the City of Portland’s Citizen Review Committee, the
executive board of the Giving Tree NW, Health Care for All Oregon, the NAACP,
Korean American Coalition of Oregon, and the Democratic Party of Oregon. He is
a member of Portland DSA and the DSA front BerniePDX/Our Revolution, and on the
board of directors of the far-left Asian Pacific
American Network of Oregon—all groups with considerable electoral experience.
Currently, Lee is seeking Portland DSA’s
endorsement. If he gets both local and national DSA endorsement, Lee will have
an army of small donors and several hundred free doorknockers and phone-bankers
on his team.
While the incumbent Blumenauer has ties to
some DSA veterans, that may not do him much good. The DSA is likely to throw
the old Jewish white “progressive” under the bus in favor of the young
Korean/black socialist.
Lee is supporting Paige Kreisman in her run for Oregon Assembly District 42. Kreisman is a
self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist and member of both the DSA and CPUSA.
Lee is also supporting Doyle Canning, who is running for Congress in Oregon’s 4th District against Congressional
Progressive Caucus co-founder Peter DeFazio. Canning has long been associated
with FRSO/Liberation Road activists.
Mike Siegel
Mike Siegel is contesting Texas’s 10th Congressional District, which stretches
from just north of Austin almost to Houston, against incumbent Republican
Michael McCaul. In 2018, Siegel lost to McCaul by only four points in what is
normally a safe Republican district, so the second time around, he may be even
more of a threat.
Siegel is an assistant city attorney in
Austin. He has worked as a public school teacher with Teach for America and
co-founded two nonprofit education organizations.
Siegel’s far-left credentials are
impeccable. He’s the son of Oakland, California-based activist/attorney Dan Siegel, once
the West Coast leader of the Communist Workers Party, a group known for its
blind loyalty to China and North Korea.
At Cornell University, Mike Siegel was president
of the far-left National Lawyers Guild student chapter. He also served as an
intern at the equally radical Center for Constitutional Rights, researching
issues such as civil liability for military contractors. He also worked as
legal coordinator for the “Winter Soldier: Iraq and Afghanistan” conference
presented by the FRSO front group Iraq Veterans Against the War.
In 2018, Mike Siegel was heavily
supported by several DSA-controlled groups
including Our Revolution–Central Texas, Left Up to US, and Texas Alliance for
Retired Americans. Austin DSA membership coordinator Jacob Aronowitz also served on Mike Siegel’s 2018 staff.
By July 2019, the Siegel campaign had
garnered a number of key national and local endorsements, such as: far-left California congressman Ted Lieu; DSA front
organization Progressive Democrats of America; International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers; National Union of Healthcare Workers; and leftist Mike
Floyd of the Pearland ISD school board.
Austin DSA and neighboring Williamson
County DSA can muster over 1,000 members between them. Austin DSA is currently
supporting one of its own comrades, Heidi Sloan,
against Republican Roger Williams in District 25. However, they will almost
certainly support Siegel as well if they think he has any chance of defeating
McCaul.
Eva Putzova
Eva Putzova is contesting the Democratic primary in Arizona’s District 1,
which encompasses all of the northern and eastern part of the state. Her
opponent is incumbent “moderate” Democrat Tom O’Halleran, who in 2018 defeated
his Republican opponent by about 8 points.
Putzova, a Slovakian immigrant, has been
very active in public life in Flagstaff. She was elected to the Flagstaff City
Council in November 2014 to a four-year term. She also served on the Board of
Directors of Flagstaff Arts Council, the Audit Committee, the Economic
Collaborative of Northern Arizona, and the Northern Arizona Intergovernmental
Public Transportation Authority.
In 2016, she led a successful local citizen
initiative, “raising Flagstaff’s minimum wage to $15 by 2021, implementing one
fair wage by 2026, and establishing local labor standards enforcement,”
according to her former councilmember
bio.
Putzova was also a “board member of Friends
of Flagstaff’s Future—a multi-issue organization that advocates for a socially
and environmentally just Flagstaff.” She has also “contributed to the goals of
local commissions and committees, including the Regional Plan Citizen Advisory
Committee, Coconino Community College Citizen Review Panel, Citizen Review
Commission for Flagstaff Regional Five-Year and Long-Range Transit Plan, and
the Greater Flagstaff Economic Council.”
Currently, Putzova works as the director of
communications for Restaurant Opportunities Centers United, a far-left labor
organization with ties to FRSO/Liberation Road.
For several years, Putzova has been active
in the Flagstaff branch of Progressive Democrats of America, a national
organization closely affiliated with the DSA. The national organization is
supporting Putzova, one of their earliest endorsements of the 2020 election cycle. She is also close to Our
Revolution—Flagstaff Progressives, which on a national scale is also heavily
dominated by DSA members.
Putzova is also very close to Flagstaff
DSA, which will likely support her in her
upcoming battles with O’Halleran and any Republican challenger.
We Ain’t Seen Nothing Yet
While many U.S. voters have been shocked by
the antics of “The Squad” and the Democrats’ increasingly obvious shift to the
hard left—we ain’t seen nothing yet.
The Democrats have been edging left since
the 1960s. The socialist shift accelerated dramatically under President Barack
Obama and went into overdrive with the Bernie Sanders campaign of 2016.
Currently, the DSA, CPUSA, and
FRSO/Liberation Road are contesting for ground in the Democratic Party at every
level, from county commissions and education boards to the House of
Representatives and even the U.S. Senate. It’s only a matter of time until they
completely dominate a once-great political party.
Whether Bush, Lee, Siegel, and Putzova win
or not in 2020 is largely immaterial. There are hundreds more like them
standing in line, waiting for their shot.
The Trump administration and the Republican
Party are right to campaign against socialism and communism in 2020. Only by
waking up millions of U.S. voters to the imminent Marxist threat can we have
any hope of saving this great republic.
Trevor Loudon is an author, filmmaker, and
public speaker from New Zealand. For more than 30 years, he has researched
radical left, Marxist, and terrorist movements and their covert influence on
mainstream politics.
Views expressed in this article are the
opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch
Times.
No comments:
Post a Comment