"While America’s working and middle class have been subjected to compete for jobs against a constant flow of cheaper foreign workers — where more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled immigrants are admitted to the country annually — the billionaire class has experienced historic salary gains." JOHN BINDER
Fact Check: Kamala Says Trump ‘Sold Out Working People’ Despite Smashing Economic Records
5:48
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) claimed that President Trump has “sold out working people” despite smashing economic records, telling her audience that we need a new commander in chief because, “dude gotta go.”
Harris on Monday posted a video of her response to the question, “If there’s one thing that you think President Trump has done right, what would that be?”
The presidential hopeful, who continues to sink in the polls, paused and looked around the room, prompting chuckles.
“I’m at – I rarely am, I’m at a loss for words,” Harris said before accusing the president of selling out working people.
“He sold people out. He has sold people out. He sold out working people,” she proclaimed, and went on:
He came in office saying, he said, ‘I got you, working people. I got you.’ Everyone from farmers to autoworkers to UFCW workers. I got you. I see you. I got your back. And then he passed a tax bill benefiting the top one percent and the biggest corporations.
“We need a new commander in chief and we need a new president because dude gotta go,” she added:
Harris’s remark follows September’s jobs report, which showed the unemployment rate falling to 3.5 percent– the lowest level in 50 years.
As Breitbart News reported:
The jobs data for the two previous months were also revised upward, indicating that the labor market was stronger over the summer than previously indicated. Employment for July was revised up by 7,000 from 159,000 to 166,000, and August was revised up by 38,000 from 130,000 to 168,000. With these revisions, employment gains in July and August combined were 45,000 more than previously reported.…The last time the rate was this low was in December 1969, when it also was 3.5 percent.
Additionally, the unemployment rate for African American men fell to 5.4 percent in September – marking the lowest level since December 1973 – and the Hispanic unemployment rate dropped to the lowest level ever recorded, at 3.9 percent.
As Breitbart News’s Senior Editor-at-Large Rebecca Mansour extensively detailed, the president has accumulated an impressive list of accomplishments throughout his first term in office, including significant economic strides that have directly benefited the American worker:
More Americans are now employed than ever recorded before in our history. More than 6 million new jobs have been created since Donald Trump took office.Keep in mind that the labor participation rate has risen under Trump. That means Americans who had been sitting on the sidelines out of the job market for years are finally going back to work. Since January 2017, 4.2 million more Americans joined the civilian labor force, and 1.5 million fewer Americans are unemployed.In fact, the unemployment rate has reached a 50-year low under Trump. And when you drill down, the details are even more amazing. African-American and Hispanic unemployment has achieved the lowest rate ever recorded in our nation’s history. Women’s unemployment recently reached the lowest rate in 65 years. The unemployment rate for Americans without a high school diploma has also reached the lowest rate ever recorded.Those are real jobs and real opportunities for Americans. And thanks to President Trump’s immigration policies, this tight labor market has forced employers to invest in training American workers for the jobs they need to fill.“Americans are not only working, but they are making more money today than they have in the past,” Rick Manning from Americans for Limited Government noted. “The household median income rose to a record $61,372 in 2017, as more Americans are benefitting from wage gains earned.”…Over 500,000 new manufacturing jobs have been created since Trump took office. In fact, the U.S. economy added nearly as many manufacturing jobs during Trump’s first two years in office as it did during Obama’s entire second term. In 2018 alone, the manufacturing sector added more jobs than it had in any other year since 1997—a 20-year high. 1997—that’s before China was admitted into the World Trade Organization!…Trump is fulfilling his promise to reorient the nation’s trade policies to put America first, despite furious pushback and denunciations from Wall Street, K Street, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, and Madison Avenue.The centerpiece of this effort is the deal Trump negotiated with Mexico and Canada—called The United States Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA—which is a vast improvement on the flawed and outdated North American Free Trade Agreement. USMCA tightens rules of origin, including raising the North American content for auto manufacturing from 62.5 percent to 75 percent. It also guarantees Mexican workers the right to form and join unions, preventing U.S. workers from having to compete with exploited workers. Most importantly, the new agreement will need to be renewed every six years, allowing the agreement to be updated if the results are not acceptable to the U.S., Mexico, or Canada.
President Trump told Breitbart News during an exclusive Oval Office interview this year that he considers the revitalized economy one of the biggest accomplishments of his presidency thus far.
“Look at jobs. Best jobs record in 60 years. Best individual records for Asians, for African-Americans, for Hispanics ever. I think the economy—but I think a lot of things. Regulations—I think regulations led to the economy, the tax cuts,” Trump told Breitbart News in March.
Trump attributed the booming economy, largely, to his deregulation efforts.
“And that’s why the economy is so good,” Trump said. “And it’s been good even before I got the tax cuts.”
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) ripped what he called
the country’s “new aristocratic elite” for engineering the United States
economy against the American middle class.
Recent research revealed that while coastal, elite metropolis cities have flourished in the last decade, small town and rural American communities have suffered depopulation, mass job loss, and continued economic strain since the Great Recession.
The
billionaire class — the country’s top 0.01 percent of earners — have enjoyed
more than 15 times as much wage growth as America’s working and middle class
since 1979, new wage data reveals.
Study: Elite
Zip Codes Thrived in Obama Recovery, Rural America Left Behind
Wealthy
cities and elite zip codes thrived under the slow-moving economic recovery of
President Obama while rural American communities were left behind, a study
reveals.
Record high income in 2017 for top one percent
of wage earners in US
THE STAGGERING ECONOMIC INEQUALITY UNDER OBAMA'S ADMINISTRATION SERVING THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS.
Watch–Josh
Hawley Rips ‘Aristocratic Elite’ for Engineering U.S. Economy Against American
Middle Class
JOHN BINDER
16 May 2019184
6:00
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) ripped what he called
the country’s “new aristocratic elite” for engineering the United States
economy against the American middle class.
For his first major speech on the
Senate floor, Hawley slammed the “big banks, big tech, big multi-national
corporations, along with their allies in the academy and the media,” whom he
said have created an economic structure in which they, the well-connected,
benefit while the American working and middle class increasingly struggle to
get ahead.
Hawley said:
The chattering class often tells us
that all of this—the jobs, the despair, the loss of standing—is the result of
forces beyond anyone’s control. As if that’s an
excuse to do nothing. But in fact, it’s not true. [Emphasis added]
Today’s society benefits those who
shaped it, and it has been shaped not by working men and women, but by the new
aristocratic elite. Big banks, big tech, big
multi-national corporations, along with their allies in the academy and the
media—these are the aristocrats of our age. They live in the United States,
but they consider themselves citizens of the world. [Emphasis
added]
They operate businesses or run
universities here, but their primary loyalty is to their own agenda for
a more unified, progressive—and profitable—global order. These modern
aristocrats often claim to be a meritocracy. And many of them truly believe
they are. What they don’t see, or won’t acknowledge, is that the society they
have built works mainly for themselves. They’ve effectively run this
country for decades. And their legacy is national division and national decline.
[Emphasis added]
Defending the needs of the American
middle class against a growingly powerful “aristocratic elite” is the “crisis
of our time,” Hawley asserted.
“After years of sacrifice, the great
American middle is being pushed aside by a new, arrogant aristocracy,” Hawley
said. “The new aristocrats seek to remake society in their own image: to
engineer an economy that works for the elite but few else, to fashion a culture
that is dominated by their own preferences.”
“This town has embraced a politics
of elite values and elite ambition rather than building opportunities to thrive
in the great and broad American middle. This has left middle America—the great
American middle class—under siege: battling the loss of respect and work, the
decline of home and family, an epidemic of loneliness and despair,” Hawley continued.
“This is the crisis of our time.”
Specifically, Hawley blasted
multinational corporations for outsourcing American middle class jobs overseas
— wreaking economic, cultural, and social havoc on rural and small town
American communities in the process — and both political establishments for
treating American citizens as mere consumers.
“In places like the one where I grew
up, in middle Missouri, good-paying jobs that you can raise a family on are
going away,” Hawley said. “The jobs go overseas or south of the border or to
cities on the coasts. And once-vibrant towns decline, taking with them the
network of schools and neighborhoods and churches that make up middle class
life.”
Hawley continued:
Rural America has been particularly
hard hit. Rural Americans’ life expectancy has not just leveled off,
its actually dropped, and for women without a high school degree, that drop has
been staggering. In some rural places, residents struggle with outright
deprivation. [Emphasis added]
My home state contains some of the
poorest counties in America, all in rural places that once boasted thriving
small towns. As those communities struggle,
want sets in. But the crisis reaches well beyond economics. [Emphasis added]
The message that Washington has sent
our whole society is loud and clear: our elites are the people who matter—and those who aspire to join them. Everyone else is
unimportant or backwards. And millions of Americans are left with
the sense that the people who run this country view them with nothing but contempt
and value them as nothing but consumers. [Emphasis added]
Indeed, working and middle class
Americans have been hit the hardest from decades-long political consensus
between the Republican establishment and Democrats.
Recent research revealed that while coastal, elite metropolis cities have flourished in the last decade, small town and rural American communities have suffered depopulation, mass job loss, and continued economic strain since the Great Recession.
For instance, by 2016, elite
zip codes had a surplus of 3.6 million jobs, which is more than the combined
bottom 80 percent of American zip codes. While it only took about five years
for wealthy cities to replace the jobs lost by the recession, it took “at risk”
regions of the country a decade to recover, and “distressed” U.S. communities
are “unlikely ever to recover on current trendlines,” the report predicts.
Economic growth among the country’s
middle-class counties and middle-class zip codes has considerably trailed
national economic growth. For example, between 2012 and 2016, there were 4.4
percent more business establishments in the country as a whole. That growth was
less than two percent in the median zip code and there was close to no growth
in the median county.
While America’s working and middle
class have been subjected to compete for jobs against a constant flow of
cheaper foreign workers — where more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled
immigrants are admitted to the country annually — the billionaire class has
experienced historic salary gains.
A study by the Economic Policy
Institute found that the country’s top 0.01 percent have enjoyed more than 15 times as much wage growth as the
bottom 90 percent of wage earners. Between 1979 and 2017, working and middle
class Americans’ wages grew by only 22 percent. On the other hand, the
plutocrat class saw their salaries grow by more than 155 percent over the same
period.
Likewise, free trade deals like
NAFTA — supported by Republicans and Democrats — as well as China’s entering
the World Trade Organization (WTO) has eliminated nearly five million American
manufacturing jobs across the country, devastating steel towns and U.S.
autoworkers. One former steel town in West Virginia lost 94 percent of its
steel jobs because of NAFTA, with nearly 10,000 workers in the town being
displaced from the steel industry.
Billionaire Class
Enjoys 15X the Wage Growth of American Working Class
3:00
The
billionaire class — the country’s top 0.01 percent of earners — have enjoyed
more than 15 times as much wage growth as America’s working and middle class
since 1979, new wage data reveals.
Between 1979 and 2017, the wages of the bottom 90 percent — the
country’s working and lower middle class — have grown by only about 22 percent,
Economic Policy Institute (EPI) researchers find.
Compare that small wage increase over nearly four decades to the
booming wage growth of America’s top one percent, who have seen their wages
grow more than 155 percent during the same period.
Breitbart TV
The top 0.01 percent — the country’s billionaire class — saw
their wages grow by more than 343 percent in the last four decades, more
than 15 times the wage growth of the bottom 90 percent of Americans.
In 1979, America’s working class was earning on average about
$29,600 a year. Fast forward to 2017, and the same bottom 90 percent of
Americans are earning only about $6,600 more annually.
The almost four decades of wage stagnation among the country’s
working and middle class comes as the national immigration policy has allowed
for the admission of more than 1.5 million mostly low-skilled immigrants every
year.
(Public Citizen)
In the last decade, alone, the U.S. admitted ten million legal immigrants, forcing American workers to
compete against a growing population of low-wage workers. Meanwhile, employers
are able to reduce wages and drive up their profit margins thanks to the annual
low-skilled immigration scheme.
The Washington, DC-imposed mass immigration policy is a boon to corporate executives,
Wall Street, big business, and multinational conglomerates as every one percent
increase in the immigrant composition of an occupation’s labor force reduces Americans’
hourly wages by 0.4 percent. Every one percent increase in the immigrant
workforce reduces Americans’ overall wages by 0.8 percent.
Mass immigration has come at the expense of America’s working
and middle class, which has suffered from poor job growth, stagnant wages, and
increased public costs to offset the importation of millions of low-skilled
foreign nationals.
Four million young Americans enter the workforce every year, but
their job opportunities are further diminished as the U.S. imports roughly two
new foreign workers for every four American workers who enter the workforce.
Even though researchers say 30 percent of the workforce could lose their jobs due to automation by 2030, the U.S. has not
stopped importing more than a million foreign nationals every year.
For blue-collar American workers, mass immigration has not only
kept wages down but in many cases decreased wages, as Breitbart News reported. Meanwhile, the U.S. continues importing more foreign
nationals with whom working-class Americans are forced to compete. In
2016, the U.S. brought in about 1.8 million mostly low-skilled immigrants.
Study: Elite
Zip Codes Thrived in Obama Recovery, Rural America Left Behind
Getty Images
4:49
Wealthy
cities and elite zip codes thrived under the slow-moving economic recovery of
President Obama while rural American communities were left behind, a study
reveals.
The Economic Innovation Group research, highlighted by Axios, details the
massive economic inequality between the country’s coastal city elites and
middle America’s working class between the Great Recession in 2007 and Obama’s
economic recovery in 2016.
Between 2007 and 2016, the number of residents living in elite
zip codes grew by more than ten million, with an overwhelming faction of that
population growth being driven by mass immigration where the U.S. imports more
than 1.5 million illegal and legal immigrants annually.
The booming 44.5 million immigrant populations are concentrated mostly in the country’s major cities like Los Angeles,
California, Miami Florida, and New York City, New York. The rapidly growing
U.S. population — driven by immigration — is set to hit 404 millionby 2060, a boon for real estate developers, wealthy investors,
and corporations, all of which benefit greatly from dense populations and a
flooded labor market.
The economic study found that while the population grew in
wealthy cities, America’s rural population fell by nearly 3.5 million
residents.
Likewise, by 2016, elite zip codes had a surplus of 3.6 million
jobs, which is more than the combined bottom 80 percent of American zip codes.
While it only took about five years for wealthy cities to replace the jobs lost
by the recession, it took “at risk” regions of the country a decade to recover,
and “distressed” U.S. communities are “unlikely ever to recover on current
trendlines,” the report predicts.
A map included in the research shows how rich,
coastal metropolises have boomed economically while entire portions of
middle America have been left behind as job and business gains remain
concentrated at the top of the income ladder.
(Economic Innovation
Group)
(Economic Innovation Group)
Economic growth among the country’s middle-class counties and
middle-class zip codes has considerably trailed national economic growth, the
study found.
For example, between 2012 and 2016, there were 4.4 percent more
business establishments in the country as a whole. That growth was less than
two percent in the median zip code and there was close to no growth in the
median county.
The same can be said of employment growth, where U.S. employment
grew by about 9.3 percent from 2012 to 2016. In the median zip code, though,
employment grew by only 5.5 percent and in the median county, employment grew
by less than four percent.
“Nearly three in every five large counties added businesses on
net over the period, compared to only one in every five small one,” the report
concluded.
Elite zip codes added more business establishments during
Obama’s economic recovery, between 2012 and 2016, than the entire bottom 80
percent of zip codes combined. For instance, while more than 180,000 businesses
have been added to rich zip codes, the country’s bottom tier has lost more than
13,000 businesses even after the economic recovery.
(Economic Innovation
Group)
(Economic Innovation Group)
The gutting of the American manufacturing base, through free
trade, has been a driving catalyst for the collapse of the white working class and black
Americans. Simultaneously, the outsourcing of the economy has brought major
wealth to corporations, tech conglomerates, and Wall Street.
The dramatic decline of U.S. manufacturing at the hands of free
trade—where more than 3.4 million American jobs have been lost solely due to free trade with
China, not including the American jobs lost due to agreements like the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the United States-Korea Free Trade
Agreement (KORUS)—has coincided with growing wage inequality for white and
black Americans, a growing number of single mother households, a drop in
U.S. marriage rates, a general stagnation of working and middle class wages,
and specifically, increased black American unemployment.
“So, the loss of manufacturing work since 1960 represents a
steady decline in relatively high-paying jobs for less-educated workers,”
recent research from economist Eric D. Gould has noted.
Fast-forward to the modern economy and the
wage trend has been
the opposite of what it
was during the peak of manufacturing in the
U.S. An
Economic Policy Institute studyfound
this year that been 2009 and 2015, the
top
one percent of American families
earned about 26 times as much income
as the
bottom 99 percent of Americans.
Record high income in 2017 for top one percent
of wage earners in US
In 2017, the top one
percent of US wage earners received their highest paychecks ever, according to
a report by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI).
Based on newly released
data from the Social Security Administration, the EPI shows that the top one
percent of the population saw their paychecks increase by 3.7 percent in 2017—a
rate nearly quadruple the bottom 90 percent of the population. The growth was
driven by the top 0.1 percent, which includes many CEOs and corporate
executives, whose pay increased eight percent and averaged $2,757,000 last
year.
The EPI report is only
the latest exposure of the gaping inequality between the vast majority of the
population and the modern-day aristocracy that rules over them.
The EPI shows that the
bottom 90 percent of wage earners have increased their pay by 22.2 percent
between 1979 and 2017. Today, this bottom 90 percent makes an average of just
$36,182 a year, which is eaten up by the cost of housing and the growing burden
of education, health care, and retirement.
Meanwhile, the top one
percent has increased its wages by 157 percent during this same period, a rate
seven times faster than the other group. This top segment makes an average of
$718,766 a year. Those in-between, the 90th to 99th percentile, have increased
their wages by 57.4 percent. They now make an average of $152,476 a year—more
than four times the bottom 90 percent.
Graph from the Economic
Policy Institute
Decades of decaying
capitalism have led to this accelerating divide. While the rich accumulate
wealth with no restriction, workers’ wages and benefits have been under
increasing attack. In 1979, 90 percent of the population took in 70 percent of
the nation’s income. But, by 2017, that fell to only 61 percent.
Even more, while the
bottom 90 percent of the population may take in 61 percent of the wages, large
sections of the workforce today barely pull in any income at all. For
example, Social Security Administration data found that the bottom 54
percent of wage earners in the United States, 89.5 million people, make an
average of just $15,100 a year. This 54 percent of the population earns only 17
percent of all wages paid in America.
However unequal, these
wage inequalities still do not fully present the divide between rich and poor.
The ultra-wealthy derive their wealth not primarily from wages, but from assets
and equities—principally from the stock market. While the bottom 90 percent of
the population made 61 percent of the wages in 2017, they owned even less, just
27 percent of the wealth (according to the World Inequality Report
2018 by Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman).
The massive increase in
the value of the stock market, which only a small segment of
the population participates in, means that the top 10 percent of the
population controls 73 percent of all wealth in the United States. Just
three men—Jeff Bezos, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates—had more wealth
than the bottom half of America combined last year.
Wages are so low in the
United States that roughly half of the population falls deeper into debt every
year. A Reuters report from July found that the pretax net income (that is,
income minus expense) of the bottom 40 percent of the population was an average
of negative $11,660. Even the middle quintile of the
population, the 40th to 60th percentile, breaks even with an average of only
$2,836 a year.
As the Social Security
Administration numbers show, 67.4 percent of the population made less than the
average wage, $48,250 a year in 2017, a sum that is inadequate to support a
family in many cities—especially, with high housing costs, health care,
education, and retirement factored in.
For the ruling class,
though, workers’ wages are already too much. The volatility of the stock market
and the deep fear that the current bull market will collapse has made
politicians and businessmen anxious of any sign of wage increases.
In August, wages in the
US rose just 0.2 percent above the inflation rate, the highest in nine years.
Though the increase was tiny, it was enough to encourage the Federal Reserve to
increase the interest rate past two percent for the first time since 2008.
Raising interest rates helps to depress workers’ wages by lowering borrowing
and spending. As the Financial Times noted, stopping wage
growth was “central” to the Federal Reserve’s move.
Further analysis of the
Social Security Administration data shows that in 2017, 147,754 people reported
wages of 1 million dollars or more—roughly, the top 0.05 percent. Their
combined total income of $372 billion could pay for the US federal education
budget five times over.
These wages, however
large, still pale in comparison to the money the ultra-rich acquire from the
stock market. For example, share buybacks and dividend payments, a way of
funneling money to shareholders, will eclipse $1 trillion this year.
Whatever the immediate
source, the wealth of the rich derives from the great mass of people who do the
actual work. Across the United States and around the world, workers, young
people, and students have entered into struggle this year over pay, education,
health care, immigration, war and democratic rights. This growing movement of
the working class must set as its aim confiscating the wealth and power of this
tiny parasitic oligarchy. Society’s wealth must be democratically controlled by
those who produce it.
THE STAGGERING ECONOMIC INEQUALITY UNDER OBAMA'S ADMINISTRATION SERVING THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS.
THE ENTIRE REASON BEHIND AMNESTY IS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED AND
PASS ALONG THE REAL COST OF "CHEAP" MEXICAN LABOR TO THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE CLASS.
AND IT'S WORKING!
SEN. BERNIE SANDERS
“Calling
income and wealth inequality the "great moral issue of our time,"
Sanders laid out a sweeping, almost unimaginably expensive program to transfer
wealth from the richest Americans to the poor and middle class. A $1 trillion
public works program to create "13 million good-paying jobs." A
$15-an-hour federal minimum wage. "Pay equity" for women. Paid sick
leave and vacation for everyone. Higher taxes on the wealthy. Free tuition at
all public colleges and universities. A Medicare-for-all single-payer health
care system. Expanded Social Security benefits. Universal pre-K.” WASHINGTON
EXAMINER
YOU THOUGHT OBAMA INVITED OBAMANOMICS and started the assault on
the American middle-class?
NOPE!
“By the time of Bill Clinton’s election
in 1992, the Democratic Party had completely repudiated its association with
the reforms of the New Deal and Great Society periods. Clinton gutted welfare
programs to provide an ample supply of cheap labor for the rich (WHICH NOW
MEANS OPEN BORDERS AND NO E-VERIFY!), including a growing layer of black
capitalists, and passed the 1994 Federal Crime Bill, with its notorious “three
strikes” provision that has helped create the largest prison population in the
world.”
No comments:
Post a Comment