HILLARY
CLINTON, ONE OF THE MOST VILE WOMEN WHO EVER WALKED THE EARTH, HAS HAD A LONG
HISTORY OF ENABLING AND ABETTING SERIAL RAPIST. SHE’S MARRIED TO ONE!
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Why is no
one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after.
The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12
women on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting
back in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories
about him?
The corporate-controlled media in the United States has effectively shut down all reporting on the death of the politically connected multi-millionaire sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, only one week after his body was discovered in a prison cell in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan.
Epstein’s death was the most widely reported American event in the first few days of the week, with hours of coverage on cable television, the lead story on nightly network news programs, and pages upon pages of reporting in the New York Times, Washington Post and other leading daily newspapers.
There was ample reason for such attention, particularly by the standards of the sensation-obsessed American media. Epstein was, at least by reputation, both fabulously wealthy and dangerously predatory. He travelled in the highest circles of bourgeois society, hobnobbing with ex-presidents, future presidents, British royalty and numerous billionaires, some of whom he claimed to have enriched enormously.
And his crimes against teenage girls and young women had already resulted in a 2008 felony conviction that led to a slap on the wrist in jail time, in keeping with his status as a member of the class of super-rich “money managers.” Only hours before his death, moreover, 2,000 pages of new documents were released linking many prominent world figures, including Prince Andrew and several top Democrats, to Epstein’s sex-trafficking activities.
As to the death itself, that was sensational as well, with questions aplenty: How did it happen that after an alleged suicide attempt on July 23 Epstein was taken off suicide watch only six days later and returned to the cell where he died? Why was his cellmate removed, in violation of the normal protocol for a high-risk prisoner, only a few hours before his death? Why did the guards fail to do their rounds during the night of Epstein’s death, when they should have been checking on him every half an hour? Why was Epstein’s hyoid bone broken in several places, a medical finding more typical of homicide by strangulation than suicide by hanging, according to numerous experts?
The previous “suicide” attempt, if that was what it was, deserves greater scrutiny as well. Epstein was sharing a cell with a former New York policeman, Nicholas Tartaglione, who was facing four counts of murder as well as narcotics charges. The pairing would seem quite unusual, even provocative, given the disparity between the two in physical size and the likelihood that a former cop might be inclined to mete out punishment to a presumed pedophile and child rapist.
As it was, on July 23 Tartaglione summoned prison guards to find Epstein semi-conscious with “marks” on his neck. Epstein was resuscitated and placed on suicide watch. He later claimed to be afraid of Tartaglione and accused him of assault, which the ex-cop denied. After six days, Epstein was taken off suicide watch and put back in a regular cell, but with a different cellmate.
After Epstein’s death, social media was filled with speculation about the unusual circumstances in which he died and the possible motives of highly placed and political powerful individuals for doing away with him. The corporate media went into overdrive, led by the New York Times, to denounce such questions as “conspiracy theories,” without foundation in evidence—although the lack of evidence was due to the silence of the police and prison authorities as they sought to come up with a plausible explanation.
On Thursday came the revelation that Epstein’s hyoid bone had been broken in several places, which experts suggested was more typical in homicides than suicides. The Times again sought to tamp down speculation. Finally, on Friday, the chief medical examiner, who had delayed for several days drawing a conclusion, issued a formal finding that Epstein died a suicide. The corporate media immediately rubber-stamped this finding and sought to shut down any public questioning of it.
This was done so thoroughly that on Sunday, August 18, there was not a single reference to Epstein’s death on any of the five television interview programs. Over five hours of broadcast time, accounting, according to the transcripts, for 45,000 spoken words, the name Epstein was never mentioned.
This media silence is itself perhaps the most suspicious development in the entire Epstein case. Why was there no reference to the story which riveted public attention for several days last week? It had occasioned tweets by President Trump accusing various Democrats of collusion in his death, and statements by Democrats, such as New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, a candidate for president, that the timing of Epstein’s death was “too convenient.”
If this had become a non-story only eight days after Epstein’s lifeless body was found, the question must be asked: what is the American media seeking to hide?
Again, the New York Times has taken the lead in the cover-up. It published a lengthy front-page story in its Sunday edition under the headline, “Epstein Feared Misery of Jail in His Final Days,” which has only one purpose: further shoring up the suicide verdict by painting a picture of Epstein as so desperate to avoid spending time in his cell that he brought his lawyers in for hours of consultation where he could sit in a conference room.
The circumstances detailed by no less than seven reporters can be read quite differently from the conclusion drawn in the article. Perhaps Epstein was desperate to avoid his cell because he feared what was going to happen to him there. After all, he had barely escaped with his life on July 23.
Moreover, the Times reports: “Outside the meeting room, Mr. Epstein mounted a strategy to avoid being preyed upon by other inmates: He deposited money in their commissary accounts, according to a consultant who is often in the jail and speaks regularly with inmates there.” This again suggests fear on Epstein’s part of what others might do to him in prison.
Epstein’s own lawyers have indicated they do not accept the finding of suicide. “The defense team fully intends to conduct its own independent and complete investigation into the circumstances and cause of Mr. Epstein’s death,” they said in a statement. “We are not satisfied with the conclusions of the medical examiner.”
There are also reports that some jail staff members are not cooperating with the ongoing investigation into Epstein’s death.
Nolte: Ronan Farrow Claims
Hillary Clinton Pressured
Him to Kill Weinstein Story
9 Oct 20192,342
5:29
One of the many news-making
revelations in Ronan Farrow’s upcoming book, Catch and
Kill, is that he received pressure from Hillary Clinton to back off
his reporting on Harvey Weinstein.
The far-left Hollywood Reporter, which
received an advanced copy of the book, naturally buried this bombshell under no
fewer than 20 paragraphs and a headline that says nothing about Madame Clinton.
What we also learn is that while Weinstein’s move to leverage
his relationship with Hillary Clinton was successful in putting pressure on
Farrow, Weinstein was not able to leverage his relationship with filmmaker
Woody Allen (Weinstein financed and produced a number of Allen’s films) to help
him with Farrow.
Allen, who is Farrow’s father, reportedly told the
soon-to-be-disgraced mogul, “Jeez, I’m so sorry. Good luck.”
Weinstein also attempted to
leverage his long-term relationship with Hillary Clinton to pressure Farrow, he
writes. In summer 2017, while Farrow was trying to lock down an interview with
Clinton for his foreign policy book — while also still working on the Weinstein
story — he received a call from Clinton’s publicist, Nick Merrill, who told him
that the “big story” Farrow was working on was a “concern for us.” Then, in September 2017, according to an email cited in
the book, Weinstein wrote to Deborah Turness, the ex-president of NBC News who
now runs NBC News International, to propose a docuseries on Clinton. “Your
Hillary doc series sounds absolutely stunning,” Turness responded.
Weinstein’s tentacles even stretched
to Farrow’s own estranged father. Days before the Times story broke, Weinstein is said to have called Allen on a
film set in Central Park, soliciting advice about how to deal with his son.
Allen declined: “Jeez, I’m so sorry. Good luck.”
Please note that Merrill is
Hillary’s longtime publicist. He works for
her, and it seems unlikely he would do such a thing without her
instructions. What’s more, as of now, Merrill has not denied the reporting.
To understand just how awful Hillary’s behavior is here, you
have to keep in mind the context of the time, of what was happening in 2017.
To begin with, as Breitbart
News reported in December
2017, there are credible reports Hillary Clinton had known about Weinstein’s
alleged sexual misconduct and abuse going back to her failed 2016 presidential
campaign.
From the far-left New York Times:
[T]wo prominent women said they warned Mrs. Clinton’s team. In
2016, Lena Dunham, the writer and actress, said she was troubled by the
producer’s visible presence during Mrs. Clinton’s presidential run, hosting
fund-raisers and appearing at campaign events.
…
“I just want you to let you know that Harvey’s a rapist and this
is going to come out at some point,” Ms. Dunham said she told Kristina Schake,
the campaign’s deputy communications director. She recalled adding, “I think
it’s a really bad idea for him to host fund-raisers and be involved because
it’s an open secret in Hollywood that he has a problem with sexual assault.”
…
Ms. Dunham said she also warned Adrienne Elrod, a spokeswoman
for Mrs. Clinton who was leading efforts with celebrity campaigners. As far as
Ms. Dunham could tell, the campaign had not responded to her concerns about Mr.
Weinstein. Weeks before Election Day, the producer helped organize a
star-packed fund-raiser: an evening on Broadway with Julia Roberts,
Anne Hathaway and others.
But even without this reporting, what we also know is that
Weinstein’s alleged misconduct and abuse were no secret in Hollywood and
Washington, DC. Report after report after report confirm that “everyone knew,”
but no one did anything because 1) Weinstein had the power to make or break
your Hollywood career and 2) Weinstein raised a ton of money for Democrats —
most especially, the Clintons; most especially, Hillary Clinton.
On top of that, at the time, it was no secret Farrow was working
on what would be a Pulitzer-winning Weinstein exposé. Everyone knew because
Farrow was reaching out to everyone to put the story together.
According to Farrow, Weinstein
understood this report could completely destroy his life, career, and
reputation (which it did), and so, the Oscar-winning producer went so far as to
try to intimidate Farrow, using everything from spies to threats aimed at
Farrow’s employers at NBC News. Farrow says Weinstein told NBC he would expose
the network’s top star, Matt Lauer — meaning the alleged sexual
misconduct that eventually unraveled the Today Show anchor’s career.
For the record, NBC News denies
being threatened with Lauer. Nevertheless, NBC did refuse to run Farrow’s
Weinstein story. Eventually, the far-left news outlet sent its own reporter and
his bombshell story down the road to the New Yorker, where Farrow would not only win a
Pulitzer, but launch the #MeToo movement that took down Lauer anyway.
Anyway, this Hillary Clinton bombshell could not come at a worse
time for the two-time presidential loser, a time when she appears to be
seriously flirting with the idea of a 2020 rematch with President Trump. She
might want to remember that during their 2016 battle, Trump was not afraid to
remind voters that Hillary played a leading role to personally destroy the
women who claimed to have been raped, abused, molested, and mistreated by her
husband, former President Bill Clinton.
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF
SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure
herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why is no
one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after.
The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12
women on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting
back in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories
about him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
THE GRIFTERS:
HILLARY CLINTON AND HER
SERIAL
RAPIST HUSBAND
“The couple
parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid
speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton
Foundation.”
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Where were the HOWLERS
when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the
prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
No comments:
Post a Comment