AL SHARPTON: The Fraudster Charity Huckster
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/huckster-al-sharpton-sells-his-life.html
NAN is
Sharpton's preferred extortion vehicle. He demands "donations" from
corporations or he will single them out for "community action,"
including boycotts and protests. RICK MORAN / AMERICAN THINKER
Democratic candidates pay homage to him
and he
is great friends with the Clintons. But he's still
just a two-bit street hustler who few will call out
for his excesses because
they fear the racial
backlash. RICK MORAN / AMERICAN
THINKER
Democratic presidential nomination
Billionaire media and financial services mogul Michael Bloomberg announced Sunday morning that he was entering the contest for the Democratic presidential nomination, two days after his campaign purchased $37 million worth of television time for an unprecedented two-week advertising campaign to begin Monday.
Bloomberg, elected to three terms as mayor of New York City as a Republican and an independent, who registered as a Democrat only in 2018, aims to use his massive wealth to influence the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. He had previously pledged to spend at least $500 million to defeat Trump. He could spend far more than that in a bid to get himself elected.
The scale of the advertising campaign is truly staggering. The $37 million advertising “buy” completed Friday is more than the combined advertising carried out by all other Democratic candidates since the campaign began, with the exception of fellow billionaire Tom Steyer, who has pumped $32 million into promoting his own campaign over the past few months, with no noticeable result.
Michael Bloomberg speaks at a news conference (AP Photo/John Locher, File)
The $37 million Bloomberg spent last week is less than 0.1 percent of his estimated fortune of $53 billion, and yet it exceeds the $33 million war chest accumulated by Senator Bernie Sanders over the eight months since he launched his campaign. Sanders has the largest amount of cash raised from campaign contributions, almost entirely over the internet, but both Steyer and now Bloomberg have surpassed him in the size of their campaign kitty.
According to press reports citing advertising industry sources, Bloomberg’s campaign has bought up television time on an unprecedented scale. The New York Times called it “a show of financial force that signals his willingness to use his vast personal fortune to reshape the Democratic presidential race.”
Bloomberg has bought more than $100,000 in advertising time in 56 media markets, spread largely over the two dozen states that hold primaries on March 3 and the subsequent two weeks, when two-thirds of all Democratic convention delegates will be chosen. This includes ad buys of more than $1 million each in New York City, Los Angeles, Houston and Miami.
It seems dismally appropriate that Bloomberg’s campaign launch will take place during Thanksgiving week, already saturated by advertising for “Black Friday” sales. The billionaire candidate will be marketed like the latest Christmas toys and electronic devices, albeit with even less truth in packaging.
Under the campaign strategy outlined by his aides, Bloomberg will effectively concede the Iowa and Nevada caucuses and the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries, the first four contests, held in February, which select a relatively small number of delegates, only 155 combined, but in the past have served to winnow the field of candidates.
Instead, Bloomberg will focus on television advertising in the 14 “Super Tuesday” states with primaries on March 3, which include California, Texas, Georgia, Virginia and Massachusetts, and the 13 other states that follow between March 7 and March 17, including Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Illinois, Missouri and Washington. These contests combined will select more than 2,400 delegates, about two-thirds of the total.
Bloomberg seeks either to buy the nomination for himself or accumulate a sufficient number of delegates to block the nomination of either of the two “left” candidates, Sanders and Senator Elizabeth Warren, who claim to support major tax increases on the wealthy.
Campaign aides to former Vice President Joe Biden, South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Senator Amy Klobuchar have already indicated that Bloomberg’s entry could help their campaigns, since his advertising will be largely aimed against Sanders and Warren and against supposedly “left” policies like Medicare for All and the Green New Deal.
Another possibility is that if Sanders or Warren should win the Democratic nomination despite his intervention, Bloomberg’s enormous advertising campaign could put him in position to run as an “independent” candidate and very likely throw the election to Trump.
His top campaign strategist, Howard Wolfson, has already tried to debunk criticism that Bloomberg’s campaign was driven by concern over a potential Sanders or Warren nomination. “He didn’t just wake up and say, ‘Oh my God, the socialists are going to be running the country; I better run for president,’” Wolfson said. “He woke up and said, ‘Oh my God, Donald Trump is going to be reelected; I better run for president.’”
Campaign aides cited a series of polls showing that Biden’s campaign was falling behind in Iowa and New Hampshire, and that Trump was now even with Warren and Sanders in many of the Midwest battleground states, including Wisconsin and Michigan.
It is clear that two factors have combined to spur Bloomberg to join a contest which he publicly disavowed last February. The first is the damage done to the Biden campaign by the revelations of the actions of his son Hunter Biden in Ukraine, where he raked in $50,000 a month serving on the board of a corrupt gas company, Burisma. While the Democrats intend to impeach Trump for seeking a Ukrainian investigation of the Bidens, the reporting on Hunter Biden’s role may have dealt his father’s presidential campaign a fatal blow.
The second factor is the rise of Elizabeth Warren in polls in all four of the February contests, and in national polls as well, and the recovery of Sanders since his heart attack in September. The combined support for the two candidates stands at close to 40 percent in most states, a clear signal that large numbers of voters are attracted by their attacks on social inequality and against the domination of American politics by corporations and billionaires.
Even though Sanders and Warren themselves are fervent supporters of the profit system—Warren says she is “capitalist to my bones,” while Sanders’ “socialism” is purely rhetorical—the financial aristocracy is fearful that even their watered-down appeals against corporate greed are too dangerous, under conditions of mounting struggles of the working class against big business.
In addition to his vast wealth, initially accumulated through the sale of data terminals used in every stock brokerage and financial office, Bloomberg has a thoroughly reactionary record as mayor of New York City from 2001 to 2013. He was particularly identified with the police-state tactic known as “stop and frisk,” under which working people, particularly blacks and Latinos, were subjected to arbitrary police harassment.
At the peak of “stop and frisk,” in 2011, police made 685,724 stops without a warrant or probable cause, nearly all involving men, and nearly 90 percent black or Hispanic, most without any result in terms of criminal prosecution. In only 0.15 percent of the cases, about one in 700 stops, was a weapon found.
Bloomberg adamantly upheld stop and frisk throughout his terms as mayor, and as recently as earlier this year, when he defended the program from criticism by civil liberties and anti-racist groups. But last Sunday, a week before he announced his presidential campaign, he visited a black church in Brooklyn to publicly “apologize” for stop and frisk and declare that he had been wrong.
According to press accounts, Bloomberg followed up the church service with a phone call to the Reverend Al Sharpton, who is always willing to provide a bit of absolution to a high-profile offender against workers and youth, provided a check is in the mail.
The ex-mayor’s financial empire will help his campaign with more than money. The entire editorial board of Bloomberg News has resigned, with seven of them taking lucrative positions on the staff of the Bloomberg for President campaign, in what amounts to a devastating exposure of the real nature of the capitalist press.
Bloomberg can also expect a friendly reception from the New York Times. Two members of its stable of columnists have already declared their gushing support, neoconservative Bret Stephens and Thomas Friedman, the leading editorial cheerleader for the Iraq War.
Friedman wrote that it was “nonsensical” that “‘billionaire’ has become a dirty word and a disqualifying status for many in the left of the Democratic Party.” He added that he wanted a Democratic candidate who would promote capitalism, “not one who tries to rile up the base by demonizing our most successful entrepreneurs.”
Michael Bloomberg speaks at a news conference (AP Photo/John Locher, File)Bloomberg News to Make Editorial Changes for Owner’s Presidential Run
Washington (AFP) – Bloomberg News on Sunday outlined several editorial changes it will make as it adjusts to a novel situation: covering its owner as he runs for president.
Former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg confirmed he is joining the crowded field of Democrats seeking to take on his fellow New York billionaire, President Donald Trump, just three months before the first primary.
“There is no point in trying to claim that covering this presidential campaign will be easy,” said John Micklethwait, editor-in-chief of Bloomberg’s namesake news agency, in a staff email. He cited the company’s policy of not writing about itself or direct competitors.
Micklethwait outlined a few editorial changes the agency will make but stressed they would make campaign coverage decisions on a case-by-base basis, rather than following an “exhaustive rulebook.”
“The place where Mike has had the most contact with Editorial is Bloomberg Opinion: our editorials have reflected his views,” Micklethwait wrote. As a result, the company will end its policy of unsigned editorials.
They will also suspend the editorial Board, in part because several Board members will take leaves of absence to join Bloomberg’s campaign.
Micklethwait said he intends for the company to cover the campaign’s news “in much the same way as we have done before,” with the exception that articles will explicitly state that Bloomberg News’ owner is a candidate.
In the email, Micklethwait added that they will not investigate Bloomberg’s family or foundations — the same would go for his Democratic rivals — but would publish or summarize investigative pieces on all Democratic candidates.
“Bloomberg News has handled these conflicts before,” Micklethwait wrote, pointing to Bloomberg’s mayoral campaign when the media agency adopted similar coverage policies.
Bloomberg is poised to run as a centrist, and analysts suspect that he could take away some of the support enjoyed by fellow moderate Joe Biden.
Some believe that his “self-made man” image and support for fighting global warming makes him the best challenger for Trump.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
///
GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS
The judge found these releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election.”
*
“Clinton also failed to mention how he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
///
VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
*
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
///
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
1. Globalism: Google VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2. Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the most.
HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone virtually unreported by Corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the Clintons’
longstanding support for “open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open borders frequently comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy foreign audiences and donors.
THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIA CONNECTION
*
WITH THESE TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
*
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
///
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
////
(SOROS AND HILLARY CLINTON NO WALL)
GEORGE SOROS AND THE CLINTON GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BANKSTERS AND WIDE OPEN BORDERS
*
NEW YORK — Demand Justice, an organization founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and associated with a “social welfare organization” financed by billionaire activist George S oros, is raising money for an eventual court fight against what the group describes as President Trump’s proposed “racist, unnecessary wall.”
*
*
“Obama would declare himself president for life with S oros really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”
*
“Hillary was always small potatoes, a placeholder as it were. Her health was always suspect. And do you think the plotters would have let a doofus like Tim Kaine take office in the event that Hillary became disabled?”
“There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds,” states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no talking to him,” the memo added.
(PAY-TO-PLAY BRIBES INDIAN)
HILLARY CLINTON: Serving the super-rich and filling her bottomless pockets as she does!
*
"And this being Hillary, with her stated presidential ambitions still remaining, it's also a distinct possibility that donations to the Clinton Foundation are still being sought, especially since they have dropped to nearly nothing now that Clinton has no influence to sell. With Hillary, it's always about money. Her stint as secretary of state was completely about pay to play, after all." MONICA SHOWALTER – AMERICAN THINKER
Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
*
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER*
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
*
THE GRIFTERS:
HILLARY CLINTON AND HER SERIAL RAPIST HUSBAND
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
Why Hillary and Her Wall Street Donors Don’t Want Trump’s Wall…
NO BILLIONAIRE WANTS TO PAY LIVING WAGES TO ANY LEGALS!
"Hillary and her party supporters desperately need illegal immigrants: Hillary is bought and paid for." Michael Bargo, Jr.
*
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
THE GRIFTERS: HILLARY, BILLARY and CHELSEA… global looters!
"But there is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons, thoroughly practiced
grifters that they are, as well as their increasingly shady daughter, will not
hesitate to use such classified information as they may be able to access for
personal and political enrichment. They've been doing it for decades, and
they're not about to stop now." RUSS VAUGHN
CLINTON MAFIA AND THEIR BANKSTERS AT GOLDMAN SACHS
WHO IS TIGHTER WITH THE PLUNDERING BANKSTERS? CLINTON, OBAMA or TRUMP?
The Clinton White House famously abolished the Glass–Steagall legislation, which separated commercial and investment banking. The move was a boon for Wall Street firms and led to major bank mergers that some analysts say helped contribute to the 2008 financial crisis.
Bill and Hillary Clinton raked in massive speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, with CNN documenting a total of at least $7.7 million in paid speeches to big financial firms, including Goldman Sachs and UBS. Hillary Clinton made $675,000 from speeches to Goldman Sachs specifically, and her husband secured more than $1,550,000 from Goldman speeches. In 2005 alone, Bill Clinton collected over $500,000 from three Goldman Sachs events.
(TOP BANKS CHARITIES, BILLS WHORES)
Hillary Clinton is simply the epitome of the rabid self – a whirlpool of selfishness, greed, and malignance.
It may well be true that Donald Trump has made his greatest contribution to the nation before even taking office: the political destruction of Hillary Clinton and her infinitely corrupt machine. J.R. Dunn
"Hillary will do anything to distract you from her reckless record and the damage to the Democratic Party and the America she and The Obama's have created."
THE FINAL DAYS OF HILLARY CLINTON: MISTRESS of the SWAMP, GLOBAL BRIBES SUCKER and LOOTER OF THE POOR
“If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.” ROBERT ARVAY – AMERICAN THINKER com
HILLARY & BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
BARACK OBAMA, LA RAZA FASCISM and the
CULTURE of DEM CORRUPTION
They Destroyed Our Country
“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook;
yet they promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet
they made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They
understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made
him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”
THE RISE TO POWER OF BANKSTER-OWNED BARACK
OBAMA
'Incompetent' and 'liar' among most
frequently used words to describe the president: Pew Research Center
The larger fear is that Obama might be
just another corporatist, punking voters much as the Republicans do when they
claim to be all for the common guy.
CRONY CAPITALISM ...the rise of Barack
Obama and the fall of America!
OBAMA'S ASSAULT ON AMERICA -WHY WALL
STREET, ILLEGALS, CRIMINAL BANKSTERS and the 1% LOVE HIM, AND THE MIDDLE CLASS
GETS THE SHAFT TO PAY FOR HIS CRONY CAPITALISM
CEO pay is higher than ever, as is the
chasm separating the rich and super-rich from everyone else. The incomes of the
top 1 percent grew more than 11 percent between 2009 and 2011—the first two
years of the Obama “recovery”—while the incomes of the bottom 99 percent
actually shrank.
Meanwhile, Obama is pressing forward with
his proposal, outlined in his budget for the next fiscal year, to slash $400
billion from Medicare and $130 billion from Social Security… AS WELL AS WIDER
OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, NO LEGAL NEED APPLY TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED
FINALLY, AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT STANDS
UP TO SHARPTON
An in-depth look at the “con man.”
July
30, 2019
Al Sharpton has been in the public limelight for just over 30
years – ever since he first burst upon the scene by promoting the fake story of
a white-on-black gang rape in upstate New York in 1987. But not until now has
America had a president with enough courage to tell the nation exactly what Sharpton
is: “Al is a con man, a troublemaker, always looking for a score,” said Donald
Trump on Monday. In response, Sharpton did the only thing he's ever
really learned how to do: He accused the president of harboring “a particular
venom for blacks and people of color.” What a surprise. “Trump says I’m a
troublemaker & con man,” Sharpton added. “I do make trouble for bigots.”
Let's take a brief look at some of the career highlights of this
self-anointed “troublemaker for bigots” shall we?
Supporting a Communist Front and Angela Davis
The February 9, 1971 edition of the Communist Party USA newspaper Daily World, noted that
Sharpton had recently addressed a White Plains, New York rally in support of a
CPUSA front group called The Committee to Free Angela Davis. At that
time, the Marxist revolutionary Davis was in prison for her role in abetting
the murder of a California judge.
Sharpton Praises the Marxist Holiday, Kwanzaa
On December 24, 1971, the New York Times quoted Sharpton praising Kwanzaa, the race-centered winter holiday that had been recently established by Maulana Karenga, a Marxist black nationalist who had once been arrested for assaulting and torturing two women. The philosophy underlying Kwanzaa is known as Kawaida, a variation of classical Marxism that also includes enmity toward white people. Practitioners of Kawaida believe that one's racial identity “determines life conditions, life chances, and self-understanding” -- just as Marxists identify class as the determining factor of one's life conditions.
The Tawana Brawley Racial Hoax
Sharpton first entered America’s national consciousness on a large scale in November 1987, when he injected himself into the case of a 15-year-old black girl named Tawana Brawley, who claimed that she had been abducted and raped by a gang of six whites in Dutchess County, New York. Despite a complete absence of any credible evidence to support Miss Brawley’s story, Sharpton assumed the role of special adviser to the girl. In the autumn of 1988, after conducting an exhaustive review of the facts, a grand jury released its report showing beyond any doubt that the entire Brawley story had been fabricated, and that at least $1 million of New York taxpayers’ money had been spent to investigate a colossal hoax.
The Central Park Jogger Case
Sharpton Praises the Marxist Holiday, Kwanzaa
On December 24, 1971, the New York Times quoted Sharpton praising Kwanzaa, the race-centered winter holiday that had been recently established by Maulana Karenga, a Marxist black nationalist who had once been arrested for assaulting and torturing two women. The philosophy underlying Kwanzaa is known as Kawaida, a variation of classical Marxism that also includes enmity toward white people. Practitioners of Kawaida believe that one's racial identity “determines life conditions, life chances, and self-understanding” -- just as Marxists identify class as the determining factor of one's life conditions.
The Tawana Brawley Racial Hoax
Sharpton first entered America’s national consciousness on a large scale in November 1987, when he injected himself into the case of a 15-year-old black girl named Tawana Brawley, who claimed that she had been abducted and raped by a gang of six whites in Dutchess County, New York. Despite a complete absence of any credible evidence to support Miss Brawley’s story, Sharpton assumed the role of special adviser to the girl. In the autumn of 1988, after conducting an exhaustive review of the facts, a grand jury released its report showing beyond any doubt that the entire Brawley story had been fabricated, and that at least $1 million of New York taxpayers’ money had been spent to investigate a colossal hoax.
The Central Park Jogger Case
In April 1989, a 28-year-old white woman, dubbed the “Central Park jogger,” was
brutally gang-raped and nearly beaten to death in New York’s Central Park by a
group of black and Hispanic teenagers. Despite the defendants’ graphic and
detailed confessions, which were captured on videotape and delivered mostly in
the presence of their parents or guardians, Sharpton insisted that the boys
were innocent victims of “a fit of racial hysteria” that was sweeping the criminal-justice
system and all of American society. Charging that the jogger’s boyfriend was
the real rapist in the case, Sharpton organized protests outside the courthouse
where the five suspects were being tried, chanting, “The boyfriend did it!” and
smearing the victim as a “whore!” All five suspects were convicted for their
involvement in the crime and were sentenced to prison terms ranging from 5 to
13 years. Their convictions would later be overturned in 2002 when another man,
who was already serving a life prison sentence for other felonies,
confessed to having committed the 1989 rape in Central Park. But there was
never any doubt that all five of the original defendants had been intimately
involved in the brutalization of not only the young woman, but of several other
victims in Central Park that same night.
Racial Slurs Against Black Political Adversaries
In the early 1990s, Sharpton derided moderate black politicians with close ties to the Democratic Party as “cocktail-sip Negroes” or “yellow ni**ers.”
The Anti-Semitic Riots in Crown Heights
In the summer of 1991, Sharpton injected himself into the unrest that followed an August 19 incident where a Hasidic Jewish driver had accidentally run over and killed a 7-year-old black boy named Gavin Cato in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn, New York. Reporter/columnist Jeff Dunetz wrote that immediately after the child’s death: “A false rumor began to spread that the Hasidic ambulance crew had ignored the dying black child in favor of treating the Jewish men. This falsehood was later used by Al Sharpton to incite the crowd.”
Efraim Lipkind, a former Hasidic resident of Crown Heights who had witnessed the riots of 1991, stated the following in a July 1994 sworn deposition: “Then we had a famous man, Al Sharpton, who came down, and he said Tuesday night, kill the Jews, two times. I heard him, and he started to lead a charge across the street to Utica.”[1] According to the New York Times, more than 250 neighborhood residents went on a rampage that first night, mostly black teenagers, many of whom were shouting “Jews! Jews! Jews!” Three hours after the tragic crash, 29-year-old Australian Jewish scholar Yankel Rosenbaum was attacked by a gang of black teens who stabbed him to death. All told, Crown Heights was engulfed by race riots for three days and nights. Sharpton reacted to the chaos by repeatedly shouting the mantra, “No justice, no peace!” “We must not reprimand our children for outrage,” he declared, “when it is the outrage that was put in them by an oppressive system.”
Sharpton Derides Mayor Dinkins As a “Ni**er Whore”
During the administration (1989-93) of New York City mayor David Dinkins (an African American), Sharpton angrily denounced Dinkins (when the latter was unsupportive of Sharpton’s activism) in the following terms: “David Dinkins, you wanna be the only ni**er on television, only ni**er in the newspaper, only ni**er that can talk. Don’t cover them, don’t talk to them, ’cause you got the only ni**er problem. ‘Cause you know if a black man stood up next to you, they would see you for the whore that you really are.” (Click here for audio.)
Racial Slurs Against Black Political Adversaries
In the early 1990s, Sharpton derided moderate black politicians with close ties to the Democratic Party as “cocktail-sip Negroes” or “yellow ni**ers.”
The Anti-Semitic Riots in Crown Heights
In the summer of 1991, Sharpton injected himself into the unrest that followed an August 19 incident where a Hasidic Jewish driver had accidentally run over and killed a 7-year-old black boy named Gavin Cato in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn, New York. Reporter/columnist Jeff Dunetz wrote that immediately after the child’s death: “A false rumor began to spread that the Hasidic ambulance crew had ignored the dying black child in favor of treating the Jewish men. This falsehood was later used by Al Sharpton to incite the crowd.”
Efraim Lipkind, a former Hasidic resident of Crown Heights who had witnessed the riots of 1991, stated the following in a July 1994 sworn deposition: “Then we had a famous man, Al Sharpton, who came down, and he said Tuesday night, kill the Jews, two times. I heard him, and he started to lead a charge across the street to Utica.”[1] According to the New York Times, more than 250 neighborhood residents went on a rampage that first night, mostly black teenagers, many of whom were shouting “Jews! Jews! Jews!” Three hours after the tragic crash, 29-year-old Australian Jewish scholar Yankel Rosenbaum was attacked by a gang of black teens who stabbed him to death. All told, Crown Heights was engulfed by race riots for three days and nights. Sharpton reacted to the chaos by repeatedly shouting the mantra, “No justice, no peace!” “We must not reprimand our children for outrage,” he declared, “when it is the outrage that was put in them by an oppressive system.”
Sharpton Derides Mayor Dinkins As a “Ni**er Whore”
During the administration (1989-93) of New York City mayor David Dinkins (an African American), Sharpton angrily denounced Dinkins (when the latter was unsupportive of Sharpton’s activism) in the following terms: “David Dinkins, you wanna be the only ni**er on television, only ni**er in the newspaper, only ni**er that can talk. Don’t cover them, don’t talk to them, ’cause you got the only ni**er problem. ‘Cause you know if a black man stood up next to you, they would see you for the whore that you really are.” (Click here for audio.)
On another occasion, Sharpton referred to Dinkins as “that
ni**er whore turning tricks in City Hall.”
The Racist Kean College Speech
In 1994, Sharpton delivered an incendiary speech at New Jersey’s Kean College, where he said: “White folks was in the cave while we [blacks] was building empires … We built pyramids before Donald Trump ever knew what architecture was … we taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it.”
The Kean College speech also featured Sharpton explaining that America’s founders consisted of “the worst criminals, the rejects they sent from Europe … to the colonies.” “So [if] some cracker,” he continued, “come and tell you ‘Well, my mother and father blood go back to the Mayflower,’ you better hold you pocket. That ain’t nothing to be proud of, that means their forefathers was crooks.” Sharpton later defended his use of the word “cracker,” calling it merely a colloquial term used to describe a certain kind of equal-opportunity bigot: “It’s certainly not a racist term and certainly not an anti-Semitic term,” said Sharpton, “because a cracker hates [both] Jews and blacks.”
The Deadly Boycott of Freddy’s Fashion Mart
In 1995, Sharpton led his National action Network in a racially charged boycott against Freddy’s Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned business in Harlem. The boycott started when Freddy’s owners announced that because they wanted to expand their own business, they would no longer be subletting part of their store to a black-owned record shop. The street leader of the boycott, Morris Powell, was also the head of Sharpton’s “Buy Black” Committee. (In the 1970s, Powell had been confined to a mental hospital after he had attacked a police officer with a lead pipe while shouting, “I am going to kill you, pig.” He eventually escaped from that hospital and, in the eighties, went on trial for breaking a Korean woman’s head during another protest.)
Powell and his fellow anti-Freddy’s protesters repeatedly and menacingly told passersby not to patronize the “crackers” and “the greedy Jew bastards [who are] killing our [black] people.” Some boycotters openly threatened violence against whites and Jews––all under the watchful, approving eye of Sharpton, who referred to the proprietors of Freddy’s as “white interlopers.” The subsequent picketing became ever-more menacing in its tone until one of the participants eventually shot (non-fatally) four whites inside the store and then set the building on fire––killing seven employees, most of whom were Hispanics.
In the aftermath of that atrocity, Kareem Brunner, a black security guard employed by Freddy’s, testified to the State Supreme Court that he personally had heard the boycotters say such things as: “Kill the crackers”; “Get the Jew bastards”; “This block is for blacks only”; and “Get the Jew owners out.”
Appearance at a Socialist Scholars Conference
In 1998 Sharpton was a featured speaker at the Socialist Scholars Conference in New York.
Speaker at the Million Youth March
Along with the notorious anti-Semites Malik Zulu Shabazz and Khalid Abdul Muhammad, Sharpton co-organized an infamous September 5, 1998 “Million Youth March” which was held in Harlem, New York and was sponsored by the New Black Panther Party. The event drew about 6,000 people and ended in clashes between the attendees and city police. Just prior to the rally, Shabazz had threatened to kill any police officers who might be tempted to “interfere” with the proceedings. Then, in his address to the marchers, Shabazz stated: “The only solution any time there is a funeral in the black community, is a funeral in the police community.” “I don’t care what the Jews say,” he added. “You [blacks] are the only people that have been in bondage for over 400 years. You are the true chosen people of God, and it is not the so-called Jew.” Sharpton, in his own remarks to the crowd, praised former Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammed as well as Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan, and Khalid Abdul Muhammad.
“Redeem the Dream” Rally
In August 2000, Sharpton held a “Redeem the Dream” rally at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC, where one of the featured speakers was Malik Zulu Shabazz. At that event, Shabazz called on black young people, including “gang members,” to unite against their “common enemy” — “white America” and its allegedly racist police departments. He also articulated a “black dream that when we see caskets rolling in the black community … we will see caskets and funerals in the community of our enemy as well.”
Sharpton’s Closeness to Khalid Abdul Muhammad
In February 2001, when Khalid Abdul Muhammad died in a hospital as a result of a brain aneurysm he had suffered, Sharpton was at Muhammed’s side. He then gave Muhammad’s family $10,000 to help cover his funeral expenses. Among the more noteworthy things Muhammad had said during his career as an activist:
In February 2001, when Khalid Abdul Muhammad died in a hospital as a result of a brain aneurysm he had suffered, Sharpton was at Muhammed’s side. He then gave Muhammad’s family $10,000 to help cover his funeral expenses. Among the more noteworthy things Muhammad had said during his career as an activist:
- He
said that Jews had provoked Adolf Hitler when they “went in there, in
Germany, the way they do everywhere they go, and they supplanted, they
usurped.”
- He
declared that blacks, in retribution against South African whites of the
apartheid era, should “kill the women,…kill the children,…kill the
babies,…kill the blind,…kill the crippled,…kill the faggot,…kill the
lesbian,…kill them all.”
- He
praised Colin Ferguson, a black man who had shot some twenty white and
Asian commuters (killing six of them) in a racially motivated 1993
shooting spree aboard a New York commuter train, as a hero who possessed
the courage to “just kill every goddamn cracker that he saw.”
- He advised blacks that
“[t]here are no good crackers, and if you find one, kill him before he
changes.”
The Duke Lacrosse Case
In March 2006, a black stripper accused three white
members of the Duke University lacrosse team of having beaten, raped and
sodomized her during an off-campus party. These charges triggered an
instantaneous eruption of outrage among left-wing civil-rights activists.
Sharpton, for his part, declared that these “rich white boys” had attacked a
“black girl,” and warned that if arrests were not made immediately, there would
be no peace. He further claimed that “this case parallels Abner
Louima, who was raped and sodomized in a bathroom [by a New York City police
officer] like this girl has alleged she was…. and just like in the Louima case,
you have people here saying she fabricated it….” It later became evident,
however, that the plaintiff’s charges were indeed entirely fabricated, and all
charges against the defendants were dropped.
Disparaging Mormonism
When Mitt Romney, a Mormon, ran unsuccessfully for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, Sharpton said: “As for the one Mormon running for office, those who really believe in God will defeat him anyways, so don’t worry about that; that’s a temporary situation.”
Praising the Council on American-Islamic Relations
In September 2012, Sharpton was a guest speaker at the annual fundraising banquet of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), where he called CAIR “one of the most important civil-rights organizations in the United States today.” Also addressing that same convention was Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Two years later, Sharpton keynoted the 2014 incarnation of this same CAIR event.
Sharpton Derides Black Political Adversaries As “Negroes”
In June 2016, Sharpton led a rally at his National Action Network headquarters in support of black Assemblyman Keith Wright, who at that time was running in a Democratic primary election as part of his quest for the House of Representatives seat that would soon be vacated by the retiring congressman Charles Rangel. At the rally, Sharpton derided Wright’s primary opponents, who also were black, in terms suggesting that he viewed them as race traitors: “You’re supposed to be attracted to these Negroes you ain’t never seen before,” said Sharpton. “I mean, they must have a laboratory to just create these Negroes.”
Conclusion: President Trump Was 100 Percent Right
In summation, it is clear that President Trump's assessment of Sharpton was entirely accurate. Sharpton is indeed a “con man” and a “troublemaker.” In fact, those words are far more charitable than a disgusting reprobate like him deserves.
NOTE:
Disparaging Mormonism
When Mitt Romney, a Mormon, ran unsuccessfully for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, Sharpton said: “As for the one Mormon running for office, those who really believe in God will defeat him anyways, so don’t worry about that; that’s a temporary situation.”
Praising the Council on American-Islamic Relations
In September 2012, Sharpton was a guest speaker at the annual fundraising banquet of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), where he called CAIR “one of the most important civil-rights organizations in the United States today.” Also addressing that same convention was Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Two years later, Sharpton keynoted the 2014 incarnation of this same CAIR event.
Sharpton Derides Black Political Adversaries As “Negroes”
In June 2016, Sharpton led a rally at his National Action Network headquarters in support of black Assemblyman Keith Wright, who at that time was running in a Democratic primary election as part of his quest for the House of Representatives seat that would soon be vacated by the retiring congressman Charles Rangel. At the rally, Sharpton derided Wright’s primary opponents, who also were black, in terms suggesting that he viewed them as race traitors: “You’re supposed to be attracted to these Negroes you ain’t never seen before,” said Sharpton. “I mean, they must have a laboratory to just create these Negroes.”
Conclusion: President Trump Was 100 Percent Right
In summation, it is clear that President Trump's assessment of Sharpton was entirely accurate. Sharpton is indeed a “con man” and a “troublemaker.” In fact, those words are far more charitable than a disgusting reprobate like him deserves.
NOTE:
[1] Jonathan Mahler, “Sharpton’s Image As New Moderate Dimmed by
Video,” Forward (December
22, 1995), p. 4.
Al Sharpton Is Not a Civil-Rights Hero
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/07/al-sharpton-is-not-a-civil-rights-hero/
He’s made a career of inciting violence and
vomiting lies. And Democrats have cheered him on
KYLIE SMITH
I imagine David Duke being a
regular, esteemed guest and former honored host on Fox News Channel. Imagine
every Republican presidential candidate scrambling to praise him whenever he’s
in the news. Imagine David Duke being given a prime speaking slot at the
Republican National Convention or President Trump welcoming him to the White
House and openly soliciting his support. Imagine Duke appearing on White House
visitor logs more than 70 times during Trump’s administration.
Imagine all of this and you’ll have some idea of how the right
and even, I think, the center of American political thought reacts to seeing Al
Sharpton continue to be cosseted by the Democratic party and its allies in the
media. Sharpton should long ago have been ruled out of bounds.
Employing the morally disastrous logic that the enemy of your
enemy is your friend, the Democrats have allowed President Trump to troll them
into extolling Sharpton. Trump is incorrect about many things, but he fairly
described Sharpton as a racist. Sharpton is a “con man, a troublemaker, always
looking for a score,” Trump tweeted. “Hates Whites & Cops!” That’s a lot
closer to the truth than the framing of Democrats, who bent the knee to
Sharpton as though he were some sort of civil-rights hero rather than a
huckster.
.@TheRevAl has spent his life fighting for what's right and working
to improve our nation, even in the face of hate. It's shameful, yet
unsurprising that Trump would continue to attack those who have done so much for
our country.
.@TheRevAl is a champion in the fight for civil rights. The fact
that President Trump continues to use the power of the presidency to unleash
racist attacks on the people he serves is despicable. This hate has no place in
our country. It's beneath the dignity of the office.
.@TheRevAl has dedicated his life to the fight for justice for all.
No amount of racist tweets from the man in the White House will erase that—and
we must not let them divide us. I stand with my friend Al Sharpton in calling
out these ongoing attacks on people of color.
Sharpton holds the position of America’s Senior Spokesman for
Civil Rights only because it’s been some time since he’s done anything so
egregiously contemptible that it made the front page; the Left simply assumes
short memories have sanitized Sharpton’s reputation. I almost wrote
“inflammatory reputation,” but that word might be too literal given the arson
attack that followed one of his most notorious hate campaigns.
After a black boy, Gavin Cato, was accidentally killed by a
motorcade of Jews in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, in 1991, Sharpton delivered an incendiary eulogy
at the funeral:
All we want to
say is what Jesus said: If you offend one of these little ones, you got to pay
for it. No compromise, no meetings, no coffee klatch, no skinnin’ and grinnin’.
For extra incendiary effect, he urged the crowd to think of Jews
as “diamond merchants” responsible for apartheid in South Africa, and he
marched at the head of an angry group of demonstrators on the Jewish sabbath.
Rioters subsequently murdered Yankel Rosenbaum, a Jewish youth, in retaliation.
Twenty years later Sharpton issued a watery not-quite apology in the form of
a Daily News op-ed.
Four years later, in 1995, Sharpton inflamed tensions on
Harlem’s 125th Street that culminated in the murders of seven people in an
arson attack. The owner of the building in dispute was actually a black
Pentecostal church, whose leaders had asked a Jewish tenant to evict a black
subtenant, who enlisted the aid of Sharpton and other race-baiters to whip up
street protests. At one such demonstration, Sharpton shouted,
There is a
systemic and methodical strategy to eliminate our people from doing business
off 125th Street. I want to make it clear . . . that we will not stand by and
allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his
business.
A fellow protest leader said, “We’re going to see that this
cracker suffers. Reverend Sharpton is on it.” One protester, wielding a gun,
entered the store in December, crying, “It’s on now, all blacks out!” He set
fire to the store and killed seven before shooting himself dead. Sharpton
didn’t apologize.
It can hardly be stated often enough that the reason Sharpton
first came to prominence was for promoting a vicious lie. In 1987, Tawana
Brawley, a black upstate New York teen who wished to conceal from her father
the fact that she had run away from home, concocted a story about being raped
for four days by six white men, smeared with feces that spelled out racial
slurs, and left in a dumpster. At the time, hate-crime hoaxes were all but
unknown, and New York was still reeling over a genuine hate-crime attack, of a
black youth in Howard Beach, Queens. After a jury ruled that the Brawley case
was a hoax, state supreme-court justice S. Barrett Hickman wrote, “It is
probable that in the history of this state, never has a teenager turned the
prosecutorial and judicial systems literally upside-down with such false
claims.” A local district attorney accused by Sharpton of being one of
Brawley’s attackers, Steven Pagones, lost his job. It took him ten years to
carry out and win a defamation action against Brawley, Sharpton, and another civil-rights
activist. Sharpton never apologized for any of this.
Hatred is Hatred, whether from the Left or Right
The
Reverend Not So Sharpton is not considered a hater. He was much
sought after by 12 of the Democrat presidential
candidates,
who made the pilgrimage to his humble abode to kiss his ring.
When
it was time to renew his television show, his credentials were examined (but
the ratings were ignored), and yes, he was qualified because he is still
black. That seems to be the reason Al is a television
star. Al is paid $500,000 annually by MSNBC for his television
work, and he pays himself over $200,000 from his civil rights non-profit
organization.
You
might think a television star with a net worth of up to $5 million and
annual income of over $700,000 could pay his bills, but Al still owes $4.5 million in
state and federal taxes, and he often forgets "to pay travel agencies,
hotels, and landlords," according to the records. In 2015, Al
paid almost $2 million on his back taxes.
In
2004, Al bought himself a Rolls-Royce Phantom for his
50th birthday. That is the most expensive production car in the
world, with a base price of $475,000.
That
is one Baptist who was not held under water long enough!
Just
kidding, but he is not my kind of Baptist.
A
black killer in Dallas who killed five police officers and injured 14 other
innocent people said, "I want to kill white people, especially white
cops." When asked if the shooting should be considered a hate
crime, President Obama said, "It's hard to know what his motives
are." Can't Obama understand clear English? The
killer was a hater, and his race or political position did not
matter. By being a defender of hate, does that make Obama a hater?
It
seems hate is identified depending on the hater and the hatee.
A
French rapper named Nick Conrad has a song titled
"Hang Whites!" that declares,
"I enter day care centres, I kill white babies, Grab them quickly and hang
their parents, Take them apart to pass the time." In one scene,
the rapper and an associate drag a white person along a street and kick him in
the head. The lyrics include calls to kill white people and their
children.
That's
hate by a self-described "black artist, Parisian, proud sophisticate"
— or more precisely, a French jerk who shot to fame with his hate-filled
"song."
Thaddeus
Matthews, Memphis disc jockey, interviewing Charlotte Bergmann, a black,
female conservative Republican candidate for Congress, called her a
"token negro" and "curly-haired nigga." He
added, "I'm so sick of your s---, yourself, and I'm about to put
your a-- up outta here," he said. "You are a token
negro that white folk have control over." As she got up to
leave, she tried to shake his hand, and he refused, saying, "I don't need
to shake your hand. I'm scared because some of that whiteness might
rub off on me."
Thad,
the black hater of whites, is still a disc jockey in
Memphis. Charlotte won her primary but lost in the 2018 general
election.
The
mother of Michael Brown (the teen thug who was killed by a police officer in
Ferguson after Brown tried to take the officer's gun) is running for city
council! But Momma's comments will haunt her. She wrote
on social media after two police officers were shot, "If my FAM woulda got
JUSTICE in August maybe those two comps wouldn't have got shot LAST
NIGHT..." Also, "F--- THEM 2 COPS...DON'T GOT NO SYMPATHY
FOR THEM OR THEY FAMILIES…Aint no FUN when the Rabbit got the GUN."
That
too is undisguised, unreasonable, and uncontrolled hate and indicates a problem
in public education.
Maggie
Gallagher cited a book that
expresses extreme hatred toward conservative Christians in America who
"tend to hold relatively high levels of social power." So Many Christians,
So Few Lions: Is There Christianophobia in the United States? was authored by
George Yancey and David A. Williamson, who asked people about conservative
Christians. "'I want them [conservative Christians] all to die
in a fire,' said one man with a doctorate[.] ... 'The only good Christian is a
dead Christian,' said another man with a doctorate. 'I abhor them
and I wish we could do away with them,' said a woman with a master's
degree. 'A tortuous death would be too good for them,' said a
college-educated man. 'They should be eradicated without hesitation
or remorse,' said an elderly woman with a master's degree."
Hate
is not defined by education, race (and yes, of course blacks can be racists),
religion, national origin, politics, or financial status.
"Look
at thus [sic] chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist's
arrogated entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while
feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate
their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes." This was
so eloquently spoken by white Georgetown University professor Christine Fair. Chrisy is no longer
teaching at Georgetown; she is "on leave."
No
sane person will defend hate, but many haters use hate as a weapon and often go
into battle with Christian conservatives. Since the progressive
cannot defend his castle in ruins (liberalism), he fires the only bullet in his
possession: "You're a hater." That is supposed to settle
the argument in favor of progressives!
Pseudo-intellectuals
like Georgetown's Michael Eric Dyson said after George Zimmerman was acquitted in the killing of
Trayvon Martin that it would be a good thing for more white children to be
murdered so Americans could better understand racism. Mike is also a
Baptist preacher, but not a historical or biblical Baptist, for sure.
Sarah
Jeong is a member of the New York Times editorial
board. She wrote: "Dumba-- f------ white people marking up the
internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on a fire
hydrant." Also, "Are white people predisposed to burn
faster in the sun, thus logically only being fit to live underground like
groveling goblins[?]" Finally Sarah's "White men are
b-------"; "#CancelWhitePeople"; "oh man it's kind of sick
how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men" and "f---
white women lol."
Sarah
is still with the Times!
According
to a report from Newsweek,
Trinity College professor Johnny Eric Williams is making waves
again. Breitbart News reported in June
2017 that Williams had argued that first responders should have let
Representative Steve Scalise die after he was shot during a practice for the
congressional baseball game. Williams also shared a blog post by an
anonymous author that asked black people to withhold life-saving help from
white people in need.
In
a recent social media post, Williams wrote that "whiteness is terrorism[].
... If you see them [whites] drowning. If you see them in a burning
building. If they are bleeding out in an emergency
room. If the ground is crumbling beneath them. If they are
in a park and they turn their weapons on each other: do nothing," the post
read.
Of
course, hatred is hatred whether from the Left or right or in the middle;
however, all the haters quoted today have been from far out in left field.
Dr. Don Boys is a former member of
the Indiana House of Representatives who ran a large Christian school in
Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA Today for 8
years. Boys authored 18 books, the most
recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! EBook
is available here with the printed edition (and other
titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow him on Facebook at Don Boys, Ph.D. and visit his
blog. Send
request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to
his articles, and click here
to support his work
with a donation.
REPORT:
Al Sharpton Paid $1 Million by His Own Charity in 2018
17 Nov 2019127
2:46
Rev. Al
Sharpton received more than $1 million from the National Action Network (NAN)
in 2018, tax filings reportedly show.
Sharpton
was paid $1,046,948 by the
non-profit, and he also got “a $324,000 salary — 32% higher than his 2017 pay —
in addition to a $159,596 bonus and $563,352 in ‘other compensation,'”
according to the New York Post.
The report continued:
The Harlem-based nonprofit — which Sharpton controls as
president and CEO — said the extra cash was to make up for the years from 2004
to 2017 when he didn’t get his full pay. NAN said it hired an executive
compensation firm that determined the good reverend was owed $1.252 million —
but he was generously willing to take $500,000 less.
“Fifteen years, you are talking about since 2004 when I came
back after running for president,” Sharpton commented. “For anybody else it
would be laughable.”
The reverend also claimed that, like anyone else, he deserved
the raise.
“It’s a six-day-a-week job and several hours a day and when [the
compensation firm] compared it to other companies, other nonprofits, that’s the
salary that they would get.”
Saturday,
NAN said in a press release that
the organization experienced strong financial support during 2018, and it
anticipated the same for 2019.
Sharpton posted the announcement to his Twitter account.
NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK (NAN) REPORTS AN
INCREASE IN FINANCIAL SUPPORT IN 2018 & A STRONG FINANCIAL FORECAST FOR
2019 AFTER A SUCCESSFUL BIRTHDAY FUNDRAISER WHICH GENERATED A SIGNIFICANT
RETURN ON NAN’S PURCHASE OF REV. SHARPTON LIFE STORY RIGHTS
“National Acton Network (NAN) is reporting that donations in
2018 increased by approximately a million dollars from 2017, helping the organization
to expand programmatic initiatives in technology and voter engagement, while
also boosting NAN staffing across the country,” the statement read.
The release continued:
Finally, the revenue from Rev. Sharpton’s birthday has already generated
hundreds of thousands of dollars for NAN, and when a final tally is made, the
Board is confident it will exceed in one-year what they put up for his life
rights in ten-years. This doesn’t include the revenue they will get for use of
his historic photo archives and other items for a documentary, as well as
commitments for a one-person play and more.
Despite his
recent pay raise, Sharpton reportedly still owes $698,470.99 in back taxes
to the state of New York for three of his companies, according to the Post.
No comments:
Post a Comment