Judicial Watch Corruption Chronicles, November 27, 2019
https://www.judicialwatch.org/corruption-chronicles/sanctuaries-to-release-illegal-immigrants-jailed-for-rape-murder-child-molestation/
“What is driving that kind of growth? Over 10-12 million legal immigrants in California were born abroad. Immigrants birth 900,000 babies annually. (www.cis.org, Dr. Steven Camarata) Something in the range of 4 to 5 million illegal immigrants live and work in California. Most do not pay taxes and others pay on forged identification.”
CALIFORNIA:
AMERICA'S FIRST FAILED STATE
By Frosty Wooldridge
NewsWithViews.com
In 1965, California housed a reasonable 15 million people.
No traffic jams, little air pollution and everyone spoke English. Route 66,
from Chicago to Los Angeles, ended at the Santa Monica Pier. Americans drove to
Yosemite National Park for a delightful weekend of hiking. Tony Bennett sang,
“I left my heart in San Francisco.”
California ranked among the top five educational systems in
America. Hollywood produced incredible movies with Gregory Peck, Susan Hayward,
John Wayne, Cary Grant, Marilyn Monroe, Robert Redford, Paul Newman and Jane
Russell. I loved Gary Cooper. Bing Crosby sang away our troubles and Bob Hope
laughed away our cares.
Few criminals plied the streets of cities in California.
Everyone pledged their allegiance to the United States of America and our stars
and stripes. Skiers and surfers plied the waves and moguls.
But in 1965, something happened in the Halls of Congress
called the “Immigration Reform Act” pushed by the late Teddy Kennedy that
changed the 200,000 annual incoming immigrants from compatible countries to 1.2
million third world immigrants annually. Senator Howard Metzenbaum said, “He
let the flood gates wide open.”
Within 40 years, the United States galloped from 193 million
people to 315 million in 2012. Kennedy’s bill will add another 138 million
people by 2050-a scant 38 years from now. From a net exporter of oil, we now
import 7 out of 10 barrels at a cost of trillions of dollars. Kennedy’s
egregious mistake changed the ethnic, linguistic and cultural foundation of
America into what we see in California today. Also, Houston, Chicago, Miami,
Detroit and New York.
His single act changed the entire history of America from
success to utter and growing chaos on multiple levels.
California reached a mind-blowing 38 million people in 2011.
It adds 1,655 people net gain daily. It adds over 400 vehicles 24/7 on its
already crushed highways. (Source:www.CapsWeb.org) California expects to add 20
million people within 30 years.
What is
driving that kind of growth? Over 10-12 million legal immigrants in California
were born abroad. Immigrants birth 900,000 babies annually. (www.cis.org, Dr.
Steven Camarata) Something in the range of 4 to 5 million illegal immigrants
live and work in California. Most do not pay taxes and others pay on forged
identification.
For every added person, 25.4 acres of land must be destroyed
to build homes, schools, roads, malls and everything else to support that
person. Known as “ecological footprint”, it destroys wilderness and arable
land. Thus, California leads the country in animal and plant extinction rates.
Worse, California with its seething, hungry human mob sucks
up so much water from the Colorado River that it fails to reach the ocean. As
it adds another 20 million people, it will destroy millions upon millions of
acres of farmland.
On the educational front, over 100 languages now paralyze
California school systems. From the top five states in education, California
sank to the bottom five in the United States. English has become a foreign
language in California.
As to crime, MS-13 gangs work with the 20,000 member “18th
Street Gang” to power drugs, guns and other contraband into the streets of
America. Pot farms grow in national parks.
As to cultural breakdown, California now features major
Mexican cock fighting organizations throughout the state. Police caught one
group of 300 Mexicans last week as they roared and screamed at their blood
sport:
In Freemont, California, the call to worship for its
dominant Muslim immigrant audience heralds from the growing network of Mosques.
Women’s rights degrade, female genital mutilation grows, arranged marriages are
commonplace and honor killings take place. (Covered up by the liberal press, of
course.)
Yosemite features wall to wall crowds that make any chance
for a wilderness experience a hike into human dominated wilderness frenzy.
Most of the children born in California today feature
Mexican parents living on American welfare. The EBT program or Electronic
Benefits Transfers rewards single mothers unlimited financial support for every
baby they produce. And they produce them by the tens of thousands. One mother
said on a recording, “I get everything for free…I don’t know why anyone would
want to work in America.”Write me at frostyw@juno.com and I will send you the
live video of the interview.
Thus, California runs a $24 billion debt that cannot be
paid. Ultimately, California will bankrupt into chaos. It suffers from a
Faustian Bargain that degrades into Hobson’s Choice.
With so many languages, so many ethnic tribes and so many
cultures fighting for dominance in California, how will it survive the next 20
million added people? The TV journalist Bill Moyers asked the famed science
fiction writer Isaac Asimov, “Which is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or
the population explosion?
“The latter absolutely!” said Asimov. “To bring about
nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To
bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the
destruction of our most cherished values—there is no need to do anything. We
need only do nothing except what comes naturally—and breed. And how easy it is
to do nothing."
Asimov followed up with a penetrating reality check brought
about by overpopulation: “...democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human
dignity cannot survive it. Convenience and decency cannot survive it. As you
put more and more people into the world, the value of life not only declines,
it disappears. It doesn't matter if someone dies. The more people there are,
the less one individual matters.”
California
will become our first third world country within our country. It pretty well
has reached that status in 2012. It’s a failing state like Mexico. Corruption
is a mechanism by which a third world country operates. Illiteracy drives a
failed state. California defines that reality.
I suspect that Houston, Chicago, Detroit and other heavily
dominated immigrant cities will follow California. How come I see this “thing”
accelerating and most Americans apathetically sit by and do nothing? Our kids
will curse our inaction and historians will laugh at the stupidity of mass
immigration, diversity and multiculturalism as it took the greatest country in
the world down to its knees. Tragically, we did nothing to stop it.
To show you where we’re headed in-depth, read Pat Buchanan’s
epic work: Suicide of a Superpower.
Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews
top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at
www.themicroeffect.com at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time
zone.
BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals
call it their DREAM ACT)
BOOK:
MEXIFORNIA –
THE SHATTERING OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
WITH THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION
"Victor Davis Hanson brings a lifetime of experience in
California's Central Valley to this indictment of multiculturalism and mass
immigration." -- Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies
READER’S REVIEW (source: AMAZON)
If you don't understand something or disagree with a concept
then the best way to conceal your ignorance or discredit the idea is to call it
"racist". Dr. Hanson did not have to go very far out on a limb to
make the point that non assimilation of Chicanos to American culture is
divisive and destructive - and that it is the new immigrant that is failing to
adapt. Great book, on point and very timely.
*Starred Review*
Classics professor Hanson is also,
like generations of his family before him, a fruit farmer in California's
central valley. He has employed immigrants, seen them flood his community
during the last 30 years of mass flight from Mexico, and endured the crime
associated with illegal immigrants. Hanson is immensely sympathetic to poor
Mexicans, however, and the most powerful chapter here outlines the harried life
of the illegal alien. But he hates to see the ordered culture in which he grew
up drowned by an alien inundation whose undeserving beneficiaries are Mexico's
kleptocratic rulers, for whom an open border is a safety valve expelling the
potential for democratic change. The four solutions to the mess that Hanson
enumerates include continuing de facto open borders but insisting on rapid
acculturation; patrolling the border effectively and reducing legal
immigration; imposing "sweeping restrictions on immigration" and
ending Mexican chauvinism in the U.S.; and allowing present policies to make California
increasingly mirror an unreformed Mexico. Hanson thinks that the U.S.
"still need not do everything right" to prevent social collapse in
the Southwest and that the totalitarian uniformity of valueless mass culture
may soften that collapse. He also sees very clearly what has brought this
crisis on: the American globalist ideology's lust for cheap labor and emphasis
on "raw inclusiveness" instead of "standards and taste."
*
Review
"Hanson's 'Mexifornia' is that rare book that combines
scholarship with personal experience to provide genuine insight into a complex
issue." -- Linda Chavez, author of An Unlikely Conservative
*
"Victor Davis Hanson brings a lifetime of experience in
California's Central Valley to this indictment of multiculturalism and mass
immigration." -- Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies
• Hardcover: 150 pages
• Publisher: Encounter Books; 1 edition (July 25, 2003)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1893554732
• ISBN-13: 978-1893554733
ALL REVIEWS ARE FROM AMAZON.com
REVIEW 1
This review is from: Mexifornia: A
State of Becoming (Hardcover)
This book shows how Mexico sends
their poor to America to work, so they don't have to improve their own country,
and how we use these people for cheap labor so that we can sell things for less.
It's a deal made between the two countries. The trouble is, it's not what
American citizens want. The "servants of the people", the
representatives, are not listening to us, so it's always exciting to read
something that really tells it like it is.
This book is written from the
viewpoint of someone who actually lives with these Mexican immigrants. The rich
people who want to use them in their businesses for cheap labor don't live with
them; the liberal elites who push for them to get amnesty don't live with them.
This guy lives among them, and knows the problems first hand, and as I
suspected, there are many, and they're not pretty.
He writes very bluntly about the
problems, but not without sympathy for the Mexican immigrants whose own country
won't take care of them. With all the new books out and the discussions going
on about legal and illegal immigration, and what the American people want, I'm
hoping that these problems will be solved. This book is one of the best on the
subject, because it is written from a viewpoint of personal experience.
*
REVIEW 2
Victor Hanson combines scholarship
(Professor at Cal State) with personal experience (life long resident and
farmer in central CA. who has Mexican-American family and friends) to present a
thoughtful look at the illegal Mexican immigration crisis. Hanson argues that
the reason for this crisis is that both ends of the political spectrum have
vested interests in continuing the unabated entry of illegal Mexicans.
Republicans wish to placate business interests with cheap labor and Democrats
hope for a future electoral base. Hanson further explains that this wave is not
like the earlier waves of Polish, Jewish, or Italian immigration which was of a
fixed duration and where the connection of the new immigrant to the Homeland
was more thoroughly severed.
This book is well written and to
the point (approx. 140 pages). I have also seen Victor Hanson on several
political talk shows. He is well spoken and mild mannered which is a welcome
relief from the cacophonous diatribe we too often get on cable news channels.
*
REVIEW 3
As one who shares the author's
ethnic,cultural and geographical heritage, I thought Hanson did a marvelous job
of assessing California's major social issue, and one of America's primary problems.
Like Hanson, I was born and reared in Fresno County, albeit some 25 miles from
his native Selma. I can attest to the accuracy of his description of Selma and
the Central Valley in the 1950's.
As a child, my associates included
Hispanics; as a teenager working in the fig and peach orchards, my fellow
workers were Hispanic. During my professional career, I have hired and promoted
many Hispanics.
Hanson's Scandinavian ancestors
(from Sweden) and mine (from Denmark) came to America legally and without
speaking English, but they succeeded--without bilingual classes, welfare,
government subsidies, or that phenomenon known as "affirmative
action", which is being rapidly unmasked as nothing, more or less, than
"reverse discrimination". Hanson deftly exposes the race industry as
an amalgam of organizations and individuals who are quick to attack the Anglo
for any slight, either real or imagined, but who, in the long run, seem not to
do much for those whom they purport to serve.
As a criminologist, I am well aware
of the violence committed by Hispanic Gangs, and the fact that those gangsters
who do not wind up in the morgue soon become expensive inmates in our
overcrowded prison system, costing taxpayers some $25k per year each. I am
equally aware of the many outstanding Hispanic officers, prosecutors, and
judges with whom I've worked.
Hanson has eloquently described the
failure of our educational programs to work toward an assimilated America, as
well as the failure of the "separatists" in the race industry.
The one failure which, to my
surprise, he did not identify is that of our elected officials who establish
public policy. When Hanson and I were youngsters/young men in the Central
Valley, the politicians seemed to act in the best interests of their
constituencies. Today,by and large, our politicians have little integrity, but
rather pander incessantly to special interests which, in turn, provide them
with campaign funds, endorsements,and precinct workers.It is common knowledge
that, in Sacramento, legislative votes are "for sale" almost daily.
Until we can restore some integrity among our public officials, we will not
move toward a better California--better for Hispanics, Anglos, African Americans,
Asians, and all others!
Except for his failure to discuss
the lack of integrity among many of our elected officials, Hanson has done an
admirable job. Mexifornia should be on the "must read" list of all
who are concerned about the future of Californians, nothwithstanding the color
of their skins!
*
DICK LAMM, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO
REVIEW 4
We know Dick Lamm as the former
Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant.
Last week there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC,
filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant
college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest
book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal
was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across
the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado
Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy
America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the
destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is
too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy! America. It is not
that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold
Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An
autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"
"Here is how they do it,"
Lamm said: "First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or
multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can
survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing
languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual;
however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar,
Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and
bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension,
and
tragedy." Canada, Belgium,
Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities
press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided.
Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques,
Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on: Second, to destroy
America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain
their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are
equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of
faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and
discrimination by the majority.
Every other explanation is out of bounds.
Third, "We could make the
United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate
diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly
recently: "The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural
experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without
the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an
American, we! are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us
together." Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their
own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the
salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have
various cultural subgroups living
in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing
their similarities."
"Fourth, I would make our
fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second
underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I
would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high
school."
"My fifth point for destroying
America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots
of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of
'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success
was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority
population."
"My sixth plan for America's
downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would
celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than
similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other
- that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable
society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it
takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks
believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language
and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the
Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these
bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and
geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.
"E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if
we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize
America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, I would place
all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult
of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century -
that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or
'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a
bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the
large foundations fund the! doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it
impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That
because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would
make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of
millions of them."
In the last minute of his speech,
Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said,.
"Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book "Mexifornia."
His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel
America. deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."
There was no applause. A chilling fear
quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference Every
American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding
methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today.
Discussion is being suppressed.
Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and
national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that practice female genital
mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing
into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take
note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and
growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In
that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building:
"War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance
is strength."
Governor Lamm walked back to his
seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of
this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get
this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a
California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American
Dream.
California's
Accelerating Demise
The end is
nearing, and it's not that far away anymore. Oh, make no mistake, California
will still be here, but very shortly, it won't be much like anything that
people who have lived here for awhile have known.
The culture, the quality of life,
pristine environment, and enviable public school systems are rapidly being
segregated into ever-shrinking areas of affluence.
Anyone who has read this blog knows
that the focus here is on illegal immigration.
Is the presence of people who are unlawfully in the country the only
thing that has led to the Golden State's desperate financial and demographic
situation, however? Clearly, no. There's been plenty of irresponsible spending
by California politicians that is, at most, only marginally related to the
millions of the undocumented who have set up house here.
Still, you can't escape the facts;
facts that are so plain and obvious that one doesn't need to hold an MBA degree
to see that much of California's economic ruin has resulted from nearly
unfettered unlawful immigration from Latin America. We're rapidly absorbing the
poorest and least educated that countries in that area of the world gladly send
north, and the bills for having done this are coming due. California's illegal
alien and anchor baby population is well over twice the size of any other
state's, and not surprisingly, our state's budget deficit is also over twice
the size of any other state's.
When you lack money, you borrow.
California certainly has, out the yin yang. In fact, California is so far in
debt that its credit rating is the lowest of all 50 states. And when you can't borrow anymore, you do
without. California is ...
Because we have been so busy
building public
schools (among other things) to keep up with an
exploding
Hispanic population, and repeatedly
raising public school teachers'
compensation to
convince educators to work in dreary academic
conditions
surrounded by limited-English learners
and street criminals, we essentially
stopped
constructing prisons. Well the illegal alien
children, and the offspring
of current and former
illegal aliens, who now make up the bulk of public
school
students here, have been graduating at rates
below 50%.
Where does a person with little
education, who has been raised in a family where skirting laws is everyday conduct,
commonly wind up? You guessed it. Over half of the people in California jails
and prisons are current and former illegal aliens, and their children. In fact, we have so many illegals and anchor
babies that our "gray bar hotels" are stuffed. Jam-packed to the degree that the Supreme
Court recently ruled they violate 8th Amendment protections against cruel and
unusual punishment OK, so just build more prisons,
right? Sure ... with what money? We already spent it on teachers, free public
school breakfasts and lunches, new grade school campuses, discounted college
tuition for illegal aliens, and prison guards who watch over our growing
population of people who didn't seem to benefit from the money we've been
laying out to educate/babysit them.
The bottom line: California will be
releasing tens
of thousands of convicts because government
officials don't have
any other choice.
Therefore, when we say the Golden State "won't be much
like anything that people who have lived here for awhile have known," that
isn't hyperbole or agenda motivated exaggeration. It's simply reality. The most
basic function of government is to protect people and property. California's
government increasingly can't because the money is all gone, and so are many of
the citizen taxpayers who never wanted any part of this grand liberal
immigration experiment and politically correct nonsense, to begin with.
“The legal age of sexual consent in Mexico is
12 years old. Sex with children at this age and younger is socially acceptable
in Mexico. For example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded guilty to sexual assault
on a 10-year-old girl in West Virginia. His excuse: sex with young girls was
common with his people. He said, "I was unaware that it was a crime."
FROSTY WOOLDRIGE
America Vs Mexico:
Clashing Cultures
By Frosty Wooldridge
Anyone understand why Mexicans fail miserably
at creating a successful civilization? Ever wonder why millions of them invade
the United States in search of a better life? Have you noticed that once they
arrive, they create the same kind of 'society' in the United States?
Unconsciously, they create the same conditions they left behind. You can take
the boy out of the ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the boy.
For example, in Denver in December, illegal
alien Navi dragged his girlfriend to death behind his car. Illegal alien Cruz
shot his girlfriend dead in the back because she wouldn't reconcile with him.
Illegal alien Ruizz ran over and killed Justin Goodman, but Ruizz drove away
from the scene leaving Goodman to die. In Greeley, Colorado they suffered 270
hit and run accidents in one year. Over 80 percent of hit and run wrecks in
Denver involve illegal aliens. Denver boasts the drug smuggling capital of the
West as well as the people smuggling mecca of the country. Illegals cheat,
distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it's a normal way
of life. For them, it is.
Mexico's civilization stands diametrically
opposed to America's culture. Both countries manifest different ways of
thinking and operating.
With George Bush's push to create the
"Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" by dissolving
our borders with Mexico, he places all Americans at risk.
Would you become friends with neighbors who
throw their trash on city streets and parks, create ghettoes wherever they
enclave their numbers, promote corruption, deal in violence, encourage drug
use, manifest poverty, endorse sexism and downgrade education?
America's culture and Mexico's culture remain
diametrically opposed to one another. America's fought Mexico and won. Today,
Mexico invades America with sheer numbers of poor.
However, cultures rarely change and neither do
their people.
As you can see from the ten points below,
everything about Mexico degrades everything about America. For further
information, you may visit
www.immigrationshumancost.org and www.limitstogrowth.org where
you will find a plethora of information by a brilliant journalist Brenda
Walker. Her original report may be viewed on www.Vdare.com on January 17, 2007
under the title: "Ten Reasons Why America Should Not Marry Mexico." I
suggest you read more of her work. She
exemplifies incisive, sobering and shocking information.
These ten point stem directly from Brenda
Walker's work. Let's examine why America must not entangle itself by merging
with Mexico.
The legal age of sexual consent in Mexico is
12 years old. Sex with children at this age and younger is socially acceptable
in Mexico. For example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded guilty to sexual assault
on a 10 year old girl in West Virginia. His excuse: sex with young girls was
common with his people. He said, "I was unaware that it was a crime."
Mexicans remain the most sexist males next to
Islamic men. Both boast the most misogynous cultures in the world. Rape and
other violence toward women are not treated as serious crimes. In Mexico, a
custom known as "rapto" whereby men kidnap women for sex is regarded
as harmless amusement. Mexican society regards women little more than objects.
Crime and violence remain mainstays of Mexican
culture. Drug cartels and the Mexican army coordinate their massive efforts to
promote drug distribution not only in Mexico but into the USA. Mexico City
suffers the second highest crime rate in Latin America. Kidnapping remains
second only to Columbia for ransom money. Beheadings, killings and gun fire
erupt at drug distribution points on the US/Mexican border.
Spontaneous hanging continues in Mexico. A mob
beat up and burned to death two policemen on live television in 2004 in Mexico
City. As Brenda Walker wrote, "Mexicans do not have the same belief as
Americans that the law is central to the equitable functioning of a complex
nation. It's the Third World."
Mexicans abhor education. In their country,
illiteracy dominates. As they arrive in our country, only 9.6 percent of fourth
generation Mexicans earn a high school diploma. Mexico does not promote
educational values. This makes them the least educated of any Americans or
immigrants. The rate of illiteracy in Mexico stands at 63 percent.
Drunk driving remains acceptable in Mexico. As
it stands, 44,000 Americans die on our nation's highways annually. Half that
number stems from drunken drivers. U.S. Congressman Steve King reports that 13
American suffer death from drunken driving Mexicans each day. Alcoholism runs
rampant in Mexican culture. They suffer the most DUI arrests.
Mexicans set the benchmark for animal cruelty.
Mexicans love dog fighting, bullfighting, cock fighting and horse tripping.
Those blood sports play in every arena and backyard in Mexico. They expand into
America as more Mexicans arrive. They also engage in "steer-tailing"
where the rider yanks the animal's tail in an attempt to flip it to the ground.
In horse tripping, they run the animals at full gallop around a ring, then, use
ropes to trip them at full speed. It's a death sentence as the horses break
their legs, teeth, shoulders and necks-all to the delight of the cheering
Mexican fans.
As La Raza confirms, Mexicans maintain the
most racist society in North America. "For the Hispanic race, everything;
for anyone outside the race, nothing!" Guadalupe Loaeza, a journalist,
said, "Mexican society is fundamentally racist and classist. The color of
your skin is a key that either opens or shuts doors. The lighter your skin, the
more doors open to you."
Corruption becomes a mechanism by which Mexico
operates. Corruption remains systemic. The Washington Post wrote, "Mexico
is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the hemisphere." They
feature drug cartels, sex slave trade, people smuggling, car theft cartels,
real estate scam cartels, murder for money and, you must bribe your mail man to
get your mail.
Last, but not least, Mexicans are Marxists.
They promote a one-party government. As with any kind of Marxism, brutal
totalitarian rule keeps the rich in power and everyone else subservient.
As we allow millions of Mexicans to colonize
our country, we can't help but be caught up in these ten deadly cultural traits
of Mexicans. With over 12 million Mexicans here today, the predictions grow to
as many as 20 even 40 million Mexicans in a few decades as they come here for a
better life.
The fact remains, as they come to America for
a better life, they make our lives a living hell.
By Patrick Garry
Human Events Online
https://humanevents.com/2019/11/21/the-real-purpose-behind-the-immigration-debate/
The
Real Purpose Behind the Immigration Debate
How progressive framing of the immigration issue exposes their true vision for America.
How progressive framing of the immigration issue exposes their true vision for America.
By Patrick Garry
Human Events Online
https://humanevents.com/2019/11/21/the-real-purpose-behind-the-immigration-debate/
By
The current
debate over immigration is noticeably different from any other time in our
political history. Not long ago, the Democratic Party argued that unregulated
increases in immigrant labor would threaten America’s most vulnerable workers.
In his 1996
State of the Union address, President Bill Clinton proudly told
Congress: “After years of neglect, this administration has taken a strong stand
to stiffen the protection of our borders.” The Democratic Party platform from
that year read:
“Today’s Democratic Party also believes we must remain a nation of laws. We
cannot tolerate illegal immigration and we must stop it.”
The progressive discourse on immigration
contradicts centuries of immigration history. And how they approach this debate
is extremely revealing.
But
times, along with ideologies, have long-since shifted.
Now, according to the
progressive left, any enforcement of immigration laws reflects despicable
national racism. Illegal immigrant detention centers are described as
“concentration camps,” federal immigration officers are branded as
Gestapo-like, and national border enforcement is said to arise from the same
evil impulses underlying genocide.
But
the progressive discourse on immigration contradicts centuries of immigration history.
And how they approach this debate is extremely revealing.
Historically,
the United States has become a nation of immigrants through the legal admission
of migrants from all over the world who seek to thrive under our strong social
institutions. What progressives seek, however, is a fragmented,
resource-strapped nation dependent on an intrusive bureaucratic administration
to survive.
WHAT THE IMMIGRATION DEBATE REVEALS ABOUT PROGRESSIVE POLITICS
TODAY
Early
this summer, a progressive movement erupted and coalesced around the
slogan “Abolish ICE.” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the largest
investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security and was established in
2003 in response to the 9/11 terror attacks. In July, Vice President Mike Pence visited
ICE headquarters in Washington to reaffirm the agency’s
critical role in national security:
“I
want to make it clear to all of you and all of those looking on, under
President Donald Trump, we will never abolish ICE … Just when you thought the
Democrats couldn’t move farther to the left, leading members of the Democratic
Party, including candidates for higher office, are actually openly advocating
for the abolition of ICE, an agency that protects the American people and our
communities every single day.”
But when they’re pushed
to clarify what “abolishing” even means in the context of ICE, progressive politicians
quickly reveal their corrupting worldview. According
to Representative Mark Pocan of Wisconsin, who went as far as
to co-author
legislation to terminate ICE, what progressives seek is a more
robust system to adjudicate which illegal immigrant should or should not stay.
It’s the “indiscriminate, random use of deportations” they object to.
This
more nuanced understanding of “Abolish ICE” is consistent with the progressive
push for a larger and more active federal government. The role of this
ever-expanding government will expand as under-prepared immigrants are released
into under-prepared American communities, both of which will need more
significant federal aid and regulation to cope with the fallout.
Modern progressives seek a dramatic
transformation of society—a change that requires “abolishing” existing social
norms and institutions.
This
push for bigger government provides the key to understanding the otherwise
baffling progressive position on immigration. Modern progressives seek a
dramatic transformation of society—a change that requires “abolishing” existing
social norms and institutions. This explains the progressive attacks on
religion, the family, and now the nation-state.
The
growth of government helps achieve a more destructive goal; it crowds out other
social institutions. As the federal government further expands its role in
society, the breathing space allocated to all other institutions diminishes.
Progressives vilify the past and all our inherited institutions rooted in
history. Their drive to create a new multicultural, politically correct secular
society dominated by a powerful federal government corresponds to their desire
to eradicate all other sources of social authority that progressives depict as
oppressive and intolerant.
As Chris Arnade reveals
in his new book, Dignity,
institutions like churches provide the primary source of identity and dignity
to working-class Americans.
But
progressives, who cannot control these institutions with the secular government
they are continually strengthening, seek to eradicate the loyalties commanded
by those institutions. By discrediting the old social order grounded in family
ties, patriotic duties, and traditional moral codes, progressives aggressively
pursue a fragmented society composed of increasingly isolated individuals that
require extensive bureaucratic administration to live. Unrestricted
immigration—”open borders”—further breaks down American cultural unity and
social order, creating an atomized citizenry beholden to secular government
elites.
The
progressive attack on immigration laws, therefore, reflects a much larger
attack on the very notion of national governance and sovereignty. But this
attack is not a frontal attack; it is hidden behind the tyranny of a new moral
discourse.
THE TYRANNICAL MORAL DISCOURSE
OF THE LEFT
Some
progressives frame their position in terms of fundamental rights, asserting
that non-citizens have a fundamental right to enter and live in America. Not
only is such a “right” absent from any source of controlling law, but the
existence of such a right would undermine the legitimacy of national
borders—the very notion of statehood.
The charge of discrimination has become an
irredeemable scarlet letter in contemporary society.
The
“rights discourse” of the left is further undermined by their selective, hypocritical
treatment of our actual rights. Religious freedom, for instance, is key freedom
enshrined in this country’s founding documents, and yet progressives treat
religion as a mode of oppression that needs to be regulated. Freedom of
political speech is another fundamental individual right in a thriving
democracy, and yet progressives continually target free expression, demanding
the legislation of politically incorrect speech.
Of
course, if you were to point out this hypocrisy, you’d risk being branded a
racist.
During
the 1980s, it was conservatives that articulated the more compelling narrative
around public morals, based on traditional religious values and individual
virtue. Recently, though, the left has seemingly seized the moral high ground
through its unrelenting moralistic crusade against hate and discrimination.
The trope is simple:
every undesirable act or idea is infused with the same kind of diabolical
discrimination underlying early American slavery. Recently, the New York City
Commission on Human Rights banned the
use of the phrase “illegal alien” by employers, housing providers, and law
enforcement, asserting that mere use of the term constitutes a “discriminatory”
act.
Through legal admission and naturalization
processes and admitting more immigrants than any other country on earth,
America has always been a nation of immigrants.
The
charge of discrimination has become an irredeemable scarlet letter in
contemporary society. It can be used to end careers and silence all manner of
speech—even the free exchange and Socratic dialogue one would expect on a
college campus. Instead of confronting actual harm and social decay,
progressives have strategically focused on words and language.
It’s
no wonder then that the debate has skewed in their favor.
Through
legal admission and naturalization processes and admitting more immigrants than
any other country on earth, America has always been a nation of immigrants. Its
very identity is rooted in the immigrant experience. Despite this identity,
however, the progressive left now argues that American laws, institutions, and
social mores are rooted in anti-immigrant bias. Since immigration is tied up
with citizenship, and citizenship tied up with nationhood, nationhood and
nationalism get collapsed into “white nationalism,” as progressives attempt to
morally discredit any enforcement of immigration laws as a manifestation of
white racism. Any regulation of immigration is characterized as racist, and any
border enforcement reflects an act of hate.
This
is where we are in 2019: upholding laws is considered an act of hate.
ANTI-ASSIMILATION IS
ANTI-AMERICAN
Immigrants are encouraged by the progressive left to cross the
border illegally, but are not encouraged to learn and speak the English
language, severely limiting their opportunities and upward mobility. They often crowd into
sanctuary cities administered by a progressive elites whose advocacy of
stringent land-use regulations has made affordable housing nearly extinct.
The dependency of illegal immigrants mirrors
the dependency that progressive policies foster for the whole of society.
These immigrants must then scramble for low-wage jobs, facing
relentless competition from the unregulated and unpredictable influx of new
immigrants.
They come to a society in which their traditional forms of community, like
families and neighborhoods and religions, face constant attacks from a
progressive left that sees such entities as sources of exclusion and
discrimination. As a result, immigrants find themselves in a quandary. They
have been allowed to enter a strange country illegally, but now find themselves
in a state of dependency, with only the progressive promise of federal aid to
rescue them. And although they need a guiding national narrative to help them
adjust and adapt to their new home, the liberal message refuses to provide such
a narrative.
The
dependency of illegal immigrants mirrors the dependency that progressive
policies foster for the whole of society. By undercutting religion, free
enterprise, educational choice, and family structure, progressives deny to the
rest of society the structural support and opportunities that the elite still
enjoy. And when such pillars of support are removed, a vulnerable population
becomes ever more dependent on the largesse of a federal bureaucracy controlled
by progressive elites, which further entrenches elites in power.
The
progressive stance on immigration isn’t really about protecting fundamental
rights or granting new opportunities and freedom to struggling migrants. It’s
about expanding the reach and control of big government.
Some
“progressive revolution.”
No comments:
Post a Comment