“The figures show that
the majority of California's growth will be in the Latino population, said
Dowell Myers, a professor of urban planning and demography at USC,
adding that "68% of the growth this decade will be Latino, 75%
next and 80% after that.”
"When we hear stories about the homelessness in California and elsewhere, why don't we hear how illegal aliens contribute to the problem? They take jobs and affordable housing, yet instead of discouraging illegal aliens from breaking the law, politicians encourage them to come by lavishing free stuff on them with confiscated dollars from this and future generations." JACK HELLNER
“Extensive research by economists
like George Borjas and analyst Steven Camarota reveals that the country’s
current mass legal immigration system burdens U.S. taxpayers and America’s
working and middle class while redistributing about $500 billion in wealth
every year to major employers and newly arrived immigrants. Similarly, research
has revealed how Americans’ wages are crushed by the country’s high immigration levels.” JOHN BINDER
Trump administration: California regulations,
high home costs causing record homelessness
by Paul Bedard
The Trump
administration is pushing back on California’s efforts to blame it for a
historic homeless crisis, noting that the state is sitting on $450 million in
federal aid and doing nothing to slash regulations that have driven up the
price of a single low-income unit to $750,000.
The flashpoint came this week in a San Francisco Chronicle editorial that pushed California’s claim
that the administration’s policies are to blame and that the president is
fighting “against proven homeless policy in California.”
According to the editorial, “It’s Trump’s ongoing battle
with the state about homelessness that has the greatest chance of creating
immediate, negative effects for both California residents and the cities in
which they live.”
Immediately, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development pushed back, revealing that the state has $450 million in housing
vouchers for the homeless that are unused and has made no move to cut
regulations that can double the price of taxpayer-funded housing
for the poor.
The department also described as unrealistic Gov. Gavin
Newsom’s call for federal funding help to build enough units to house the
state’s 60,000 homeless.
from ILLEGALS along with their CRIME
RATES!
Times Staff Writers
Over the next half-century,
California's
population will explode
by nearly 75%, and
Riverside will surpass its
bigger neighbors to
become the second most
populous county after
Los Angeles, according to
state Department of
Finance projections released
Monday.
California will
near the 60-million mark in 2050, the study found, raising questions about how the
state will look and function and where all the people and their cars will go.
Dueling visions pit the iconic California building block of ranch house, big
yard and two-car garage against more dense, high-rise development. But whether
sprawl or skyscrapers win the day, the Golden State will probably be a far
different and more complex place than it is today, as people live longer and
Latinos become the dominant ethnic group, eclipsing all others combined. Some
critics forecast disaster if gridlock and environmental impacts are not
averted. Others see a possible economic boon, particularly for retailers and
service industries with an eye on the state as a burgeoning market. "It's
opportunity with baggage," said Jack Kyser, chief economist for the Los
Angeles County Economic Development Corp., in "a country masquerading as a
state. "Other demographers argue that the huge population increase the
state predicts will occur only if officials complete major improvements to
roads and other public infrastructure. Without that investment, they say, some
Californians would flee the state. If the finance department's calculations
hold, California's population will rise from 34.1 million in 2000 to 59.5
million at the mid-century point, about the same number of people as Italy has
today. And its projected growth rate in those 50 years will outstrip the
national rate — nearly 75% compared with less than 50% projected by the federal
government. That could translate to increased political clout in Washington,
D.C. Southern California's population is projected to grow at a rate of more
than 60%, according to the new state figures, reaching 31.6 million by
mid-century. That's an increase of 12.1 million over just seven counties. L.A.
County alone will top 13 million by 2050, an increase of almost 3.5 million
residents. And Riverside County — long among the fastest-growing in the state —
will triple in population to 4.7 million by mid-century. Riverside County will
add 3.1 million people, according to the new state figures, eclipsing Orange
and San Diego to become the second most populous in the state. With less
expensive housing than the coast, Riverside County has grown by more than
472,000 residents since 2000, according to state estimates. No matter how much
local governments build in the way of public works and how many new jobs are
attracted to the region — minimizing the need for long commutes — Housing
figures that growth will still overwhelm the area's roads. USC Professor Genevieve
Giuliano, an expert on land use and transportation, would probably agree. Such
massive growth, if it occurs, she said, will require huge investment in the
state's highways, schools, and energy and sewer systems at a "very
formidable cost."If those things aren't built, Giuliano questioned whether
the projected population increases will occur. "Sooner or later, the
region will not be competitive and the growth is not going to happen," she
said.If major problems like traffic congestion and housing costs aren't
addressed, Giuliano warned, the middle class is going to exit California,
leaving behind very high-income and very low-income residents. "It's a
political question," said Martin Wachs, a transportation expert at the
Rand Corp. in Santa Monica. "Do we have the will, the consensus, the
willingness to pay? If we did, I think we could manage the growth. "The
numbers released Monday underscore most demographers' view that the state's
population is pushing east, from both Los Angeles and the Bay Area, to counties
such as Riverside and San Bernardino as well as half a dozen or so smaller
Central Valley counties. Sutter County, for example, is expected to be the
fastest-growing on a percentage basis between 2000 and 2050, jumping 255% to a
population of 282,894 , the state said. Kern County is expected to see its
population more than triple to 2.1 million by mid-century. In Southern
California, San Diego County is projected to grow by almost 1.7 million
residents and Orange County by 1.1 million. Even Ventura County — where voters
have imposed some limits on urban sprawl — will see its population jump 62% to
more than 1.2 million if the projections hold. The Department of Finance
releases long-term population projections every three years. Between the last
two reports, number crunchers have taken a more detailed look at California's
statistics and taken into account the likelihood that people will live longer,
said chief demographer Mary Heim. The result? The latest numbers figure the
state will be much more crowded than earlier estimates (by nearly 5 million)
and that it will take a bit longer than previously thought for Latinos to
become the majority of California's population: 2042, not 2038. The figures
show that the majority
of
California's growth will be in the Latino population, said
Dowell Myers,
a professor of urban planning and demography
at USC,
adding that "68% of the growth this decade will be
Latino, 75%
next and 80% after that."That should be a wake-up call for voting
Californians, Myers said, pointing out a critical disparity. Though the state's
growth is young and Latino, the majority of voters will be older and white — at
least for the next decade." The future of the state is Latino
growth," Myers said. "We'd sure better invest in them and get them up
to speed. Older white voters don't see it that way. They don't realize that
someone has to replace them in the work force, pay for their benefits and buy
their house."
MULTI-CULTURALISM and the
creation of a one-party globalist country to serve the rich in America’s open
borders.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/12/em-cadwaladr-impending-death-of.html
“Open border advocates, such as
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to
California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the CIS has
documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills.
How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to
dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegals were
contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, CA, with its 2.6 million
illegals, would be booming.” STEVE BALDWIN – AMERICAN SPECTATOR
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the high number of
Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
FINISHING AMERICA OFF: THE
FOREIGN INVASION FOR “CHEAP” LABOR
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-fall-of-america-by-invitation-tens.html
Open the floodgates of our
welfare state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the
world and in a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone. JOHN
BINDER
But many
less-skilled migrants play their largest role by simply shifting small slices
of wealth from person to person, for example, by competing up rents in their
neighborhood or by competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest
examples can be seen in agriculture.
Overall, the
Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via immigration shifts
wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the market
with cheap white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor.
"Critics argue that
giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an
immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien
population." JOHN BINDER
The U.S.-born baby is, of course, a U.S. citizen,
whose illegal alien parents are eligible to receive, on the baby’s behalf, food
stamps, nutrition from the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program, and
numerous tax benefits, including the EITC.
Most importantly, the newborn is deportation
insurance for its parents. Illegal aliens facing deportation can argue that to
deport one or more parents would create an “extreme hardship” for the new baby.
If an immigration officer agrees, we’ve added a new adult to the nation’s
population. At age 21 the former birthright citizen baby can formally apply for
green cards for parents and siblings, and they, in turn, can start their own
immigration chains.
US now has more Spanish speakers than Spain – only Mexico
has more
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/29/us-second-biggest-spanish-speaking-country
·
US has 41 million native speakers plus 11 million who are bilingual
·
New Mexico, California, Texas and Arizona have highest
concentrations
372,000 born to immigrants every year, 33,000
to ‘tourists’
by Paul Bedard
Illegal and visiting
immigrants give birth to enough children in the United States every year to top
the populations of St. Louis, Pittsburgh, or Anaheim, and at least 33,000 are
considered “birth tourists” eager to win their children birthright citizenship
and themselves a quick ticket in, according to two new reports out Thursday.
The Center
for Immigration Studies, using federal statistics, has found that there are
39,000 births a year to foreign students, guest workers, and others on
long-term temporary visas, plus an additional 33,000 births annually to
tourists.
The group that advocates for immigration reform added,
“These births are in addition to the nearly 300,000 births each year to illegal
immigrants.”
Steven Camarota, the report's lead author and the center's
director of research, said, “Our analysis makes clear that the number of
children born to visitors is not trivial; and over time the numbers are
substantial.”
And, he added, “It seems doubtful that the framers of the
Fourteenth Amendment could have anticipated that tens of thousands of people
each year would automatically be granted citizenship simply because their
parents were on a temporary visit to the United States at the time of their
birth.”
“Birth tourism” has been ripped by critics as a top
immigration scam. Not only, under the Fourteenth Amendment, do children born in
the U.S. receive birthright citizenship, but it opens the door to their
parents, and eventually their extended family, to getting citizenship or legal
status.
The key findings from Camarota’s reports are:
- Primarily foreign students, guest workers, and exchange
visitors, give birth to about 39,000 children annually or 390,000 each
decade.
- Many news stories in recent years have focused on
"birth tourism," which describes the phenomenon of pregnant
women coming to America shortly before their due dates so their children
are born in the U.S. and are awarded U.S. citizenship. Based on a comparison
of birth records and Census Bureau data, we estimate there were 33,000
births to women on tourist visas in the second half of 2016 and the first
half of 2017. This translates to perhaps 330,000 such births each decade.
- We estimate that at least 90% of the fathers of children
born to non-immigrant women were not U.S. citizens, almost all of them on
a temporary visa themselves or illegal immigrants. This means at least
35,000 children were born to a non-immigrant mother and were awarded U.S.
citizenship at birth solely because they were born on U.S. soil and not
because their parents were citizens or Lawful Permanent Residents (green
card holders).
No comments:
Post a Comment