Democrats
Nervous as ‘Profiles in Corruption’ Book Looms
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/01/10/democrats-nervous-as-profiles-in-corruption-book-looms/
10 Jan 2020Washington, D.C.2,089
6:05
Top
Democrats are signaling not-so-subtly that they are nervous as a
forthcoming book from Peter Schweizer that will expose widespread corruption in
the Democrat Party drops in just ten days.
The cover of
the soon-to-be-published book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of
Power by America’s Progressive Elite, was revealed by Axios’s
Mike Allen on Thursday:
Exclusive: Peter Schweizer book,
"Profiles in Corruption," out Jan. 21 https://www.axios.com/peter-schweizer-profiles-in-corruption-book-2020-democrats-02c25a0a-7705-4198-800b-eba92c770ecf.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic …
Peter Schweizer's new book, "Profiles in
Corruption," takes aim at 2020 Democrats
The cover features photos of 2020 Democrat presidential
frontrunners former Vice President Joe Biden, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen.
Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), as well as fellow 2020 candidates Sens. Amy Klobuchar
(D-MN) and Cory Booker (D-NJ), and former 2020 candidate Sen. Kamala Harris
(D-CA).
Schweizer is a Breitbart News contributing editor and the
president of the Government Accountability Institute (GAI). He has written
multiple bestselling books exposing corruption in Washington.
While little is known publicly about the book thus far, Allen
quotes Schweizer as saying he spent a year and a half investigating for it, and
that it is “a sweeping, detailed look at how the leading figures of
progressivism have leveraged the power of their positions.” Allen reported
that the book features chapters on each of them, as well as Los Angeles Mayor
Eric Garcetti and Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH).
It has also been revealed that the
book will expose the “Biden Five,” a group of Biden’s family members beyond son
Hunter Biden who have siphoned tens of millions of dollars from taxpayers and
from guaranteed loans. As Breitbart News reported, the Burisma Ukrainian natural gas company scandal surrounding
Hunter Biden that was at the center of the House Democrats’ partisan
impeachment push in Congress is just “the tip of the iceberg” when it comes to
Biden corruption, and much more will be exposed in this book.
Schweizer’s last two books were
filled with explosive revelations about career politicians. Clinton Cash, his 2015 book,
uncovered significant corruption swirling around the Clinton Foundation and
Clinton Global Initiative and how the Clintons orchestrated a massive
international pay-for-play political scheme. Secret Empires, his most recent book, uncovered
much about Joe and Hunter Biden as well as other career politicians. Much of
the revelations about Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma originated in Secret Empires.
So it’s no surprise that since these
initial revelations about the explosive Profiles
in Corruption book out on Jan. 21, the book has rocketed near
the top of Amazon’s bestseller list, and interest in it has spiked
considerably.
What’s new is that a spokesman for
another top Democrat–former U.S. president Bill Clinton–is now formally
denouncing the book. Angel Urena, the press secretary for former President
Clinton, tweeted in response to Allen’s story announcing the book a claim that
various investigations spawned in part by Clinton Cash have not been fruitful. In so
doing, Urena urges the media and political class to not “aid” Schweizer in exposing
the corruption of Biden, Harris, Warren, Sanders, Booker, Klobuchar, Garcetti,
and other Democrats, but instead to just ignore it all:
After a two year investigation, Trump’s DOJ has exonerated the @ClintonFdn.
Reminder that said investigation was based at least partly on allegations in Clinton Cash. Schweizer is fixing to lie again, question is will we - again - aid him in doing so. https://twitter.com/mikeallen/status/1215270164540747780 …
Reminder that said investigation was based at least partly on allegations in Clinton Cash. Schweizer is fixing to lie again, question is will we - again - aid him in doing so. https://twitter.com/mikeallen/status/1215270164540747780 …
Urena earlier retweeted this from
the Washington Post:
Justice Dept. winds down Clinton-related inquiry once championed by Trump.
It found nothing of consequence. https://wapo.st/2QFeSpd
Justice Dept. winds down
Clinton-related inquiry once championed by Trump. It found nothing of...
The Washington Post story that Urena has been
pushing announced that U.S. Attorney John Huber’s investigation into the
Clinton Foundation has informally concluded. But the same Washington Post story says
that Huber never interviewed many people he should have, and was more of a
“nebulous” “reviewer” than an “investigator.”
The Post wrote:
Huber’s tasking was nebulous from the start. Some people
involved in the matters he was said to be reviewing expressed surprise that
they were not contacted by the U.S. attorney, and wondered privately what he
was doing. Some in the Justice Department considered him more reviewer than
investigator. He would get involved, people familiar with the matter said, only
if other cases were not being handled properly.
Urena’s insinuation that because Huber’s
lackluster-at-best review of the matter that really was not much of an
investigation after all per the same Washington
Post story he’s pushing to try to claim his bosses the
Clintons are in the clear means that Clinton
Cash did not somehow live up to its hype is just not true.
In fact, Clinton Foundation
donations plummeted after Hillary Rodham Clinton–Bill’s wife and the 2016
Democrat presidential nominee–lost the election to President Donald Trump four
years ago. What’s more, many independent investigations like stories in the New York Times by Jo Becker have upheld
the key findings in the book surrounding the Clinton Foundation and the Uranium
One scandal.
Even the George Soros-funded Center
for Responsive Politics admits in a news story that the Clinton Foundation’s
backers seem to have lost interest in the organization in the wake of Clinton’s
2016 election loss. In November 2019, OpenSecrets News–the Center for
Responsive Politics’ publication arm–published a piece detailing the sharp drop in donations to the Clinton
Foundation under the headline: “Clinton Foundation cash flow continues to drop
years after 2016 election loss.”
The organization wrote:
The Clinton Foundation’s $30.7 million revenue last year is less
than half the $62.9 million it raised in 2016 as Clinton was at the height of
her presidential campaign. Each of the two years since Clinton’s loss in the
2016 election has seen the organization’s revenue drop to record lows, raising
less than any fiscal year in more than a decade — a sharp contrast to the $249
million raised during Clinton’s first year as secretary of state.
What Urena’s tweets casting doubt on
Schweizer’s forthcoming book more accurately demonstrate, however, is that the
official channels of the highest levels of the Democrat Party–Urena is former
President Bill Clinton’s press secretary–are worried about this Profiles in Corruption book
and what it may reveal about top Democrats. And they’re so worried they’re
already, ten days before its public release, publicly rebutting the book before
they even see what’s in it.
Schumer: ‘No Person Has Done More to Destroy the Honor and Values of America Than Donald Trump’
Tuesday on ABC’s “The View,” Minority Leader Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) accused President Donald Trump of doing more than any other person “to destroy the honor and values of America.”
When asked about the killing of Qasem Soleimani, Schumer said, “This president plays so fast and loose with the truth, not only on that issue. The other day he just said he’s defending, protecting our health care, our preexisting conditions. He’s doing everything to undermine it. And the families of America need good health care.”
He added, “He, you know, I’m going to make a broader point, and it relates to impeachment and everything else. The greatest thing America has is its honor and its values. That’s what the Founding Fathers focused on. That’s what all of our great political thinkers have focused on, and no person, no person has done more to destroy the honor and values of America than Donald Trump, and that’s why I think he’s got to go.”
Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
Incorporated on
Oct. 23, 1997, just as word started to leak of Bill Clinton’s dalliance with
Monica Lewinsky and while doubts crested concerning foreign funding for the
Clinton legal defense effort, the main Clinton charity was originally named
“The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation” in papers filed with the
Arkansas Secretary of State by three lawyers.
TOGETHER, WE CONTINUE PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
Our Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
Clinton Foundation
bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But what the Clintons
do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people.
And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich
themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has
no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on
the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
HILLARY
& BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street
The Clinton Looting of the Poor of Haiti
“The couple
parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
IT WAS BILL CLINTON WHO UNLEASHED WALL STREET’S BIGGEST
CRIMINAL BANKSTERS…. And haven’t they sucked up the banksters’ gratuities
since?
Only Barack Obama has serviced banksters more than Hillary
and Billary!
“Clinton also failed to mention how
he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to
make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of
millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”
FROM DAY ONE THE CLINTONS HAVE BEEN A CRIME TIDAL WAVE!
Anatomy of a Clinton Scam
“The bigger the lie, the more likely the
buy-in” -- that must be the theory underlying a plan relentlessly executed by
Bill and Hillary Clinton to suck money from the public in support of a supposed
“charity” currently known as “Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Unlike the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation that was originally funded primarily by the Gates family, the
Clinton Foundation was meant to take money from the general public, and from
governments.
So, affairs of the Clinton Foundation
were never supposed to be directed by the Clinton family. But public records
apparently prove that strict rules governing the conduct of public charities
are not applied when it comes to long-time “public servants” such as the
Clintons.
Incorporated but not Organized
However, to qualify for federal
tax-exemption, a charity must be formally organized not simply by lawyers but
by, at least three truly independent directors, who needed to adopt articles of
incorporation and bylaws in a formal organizational meeting before the entity
conducted official operations. Bylaws for this entity may not have been
formally adopted by initial directors (referred to as “Trustees”) until Dec.
23, 1997 as you can see for yourself by reviewing these materials available
through the main Clinton Foundation website.
A reasonable question to ask is: what did
“The William J. Clinton Presidential Foundation” do, if anything, prior to
adopting bylaws, and how did they accomplish these actions before becoming
formally ''organized ``?
“Formless aggregations of individuals”
are not “organizations”
Well before Dec. 23, 1997, Clinton allies
laid groundwork required to erect the Clinton Foundation in a portion of Little
Rock that had long been run-down, depressing local property values.
However, the IRS explains that
only “organizations” are eligible for exemption from taxes, not “formless
aggregations of individuals”:
“An individual,
partnership, or formless aggregation of individuals, however, cannot qualify
for exemption under IRC 501(c)(3). If it is determined that no organization
exists, the applicant will be advised that no ruling or determination letter
can be issued [emphasis added].”
Newspaper accounts, court records and
other publicly available information show that early efforts on behalf of the
“Clinton Foundation” were not conducted in corporate form, but instead loosely
and informally, chiefly by Clinton political supporters.
“[Little
Rock] Mayor Dailey said he received word from Skip Rutherford, local
coordinator for the Presidential Library at 7:00 AM, that President and Mrs.
Clinton has selected the site along the Arkansas River in Little Rock as the
location for the proposed William Jefferson Clinton Presidential Library
[emphasis added].”
In this C-SPAN clip, Rutherford is clearly
seen explaining widespread activities carried out through Nov. 7, 1997:
In 1997, and for years afterward, Bill and
Hillary Clinton were not lawfully designated directors, trustees, officers, or
agents of the purported legal entity that was supposed to operate the
presidential library and research center only in Little Rock.
How did Bill and Hillary Clinton have
lawful authority to pick the site for Bill’s presidential library?
Moreover, did The William J. Clinton
Presidential Foundation even exist as a lawfully organized corporate entity in
1997?
Admissions Against Interest
Under siege late in 1997, in 1998, and
then safely through the Impeachment trial by early 1999, the Clinton team must
have been sure that loyal elements within the Arkansas Attorney General’s
office, the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Attorney General’s office
would never prosecute those responsible for operating the Clinton Foundation
illegally so long as the Clintons remained resident inside the White House.
Though required to do so, the Clinton
Foundation never filed an informational return (on Form 990, or 990EZ) for the
“short period” from Oct. 23, 1997 through Dec. 31, 1997. This is important
because, somehow, the Clinton Foundation acquired financial resources
sufficient to pay lawyers and fund operations starting late in October. And a
key unanswered question remains: “who advanced them the money?”
In a report to Michigan government
authorities, filed in July 1998, Rutherford explained why the Clinton
Foundation did not file an IRS Form 990 or 990EZ for 1997 because:
“The
organization [was] not in existence last fiscal year--[Not Applicable]
[emphasis added].”
In the second informational return the
Clinton Foundation ultimately did file with the IRS for 1999, on Nov. 20, 2000,
an officer of the entity admitted, under penalties of perjury:
“The
Foundation began operations in 1998 [emphasis added] and is in the early stages
of raising funds to meet the exempt purposes. Program development is in the
very early planning stage and no significant program service expenses have been
incurred.”
So, The William J. Clinton Presidential
Foundation did not exist in 1997, even as elements within the IRS rushed to
grant federal tax-exemption to the entity back to Oct. 23, 1997 as this “Determination Letter,” found on the Clinton Foundation website clearly states.
Times were certainly different from 1997
through 2000, but we remember when the IRS rigorously and ruthlessly enforced key charity laws and regulations under President
Obama.
Are former Presidents above the law?
Stillborn in 1997, the Clinton Foundation
has managed to grow into a network of entities, none of which has ever lawfully
been organized or operated. This allegation is now supported by some 200 podcasts, averaging two hours in length each, most of which are
accompanied by pull-down slide presentations that readily take viewers and
should take investigators into details of what seems to be the largest set of
unprosecuted charity frauds in history:
Bob Mueller, James Comey and Rod
Rosenstein may have “missed” the early development of this scam, from 2001
through 2005 when the FBI and DOJ “investigated” the Clinton Foundation as these redacted
records reveal.
And, on the 10th anniversary of
devastating disasters that flattened portions of Haiti, Hillary Clinton
actually crowed about US Attorney John Huber’s unconfirmed decision to wind
down the latest “investigation” of potential Clinton Foundation crimes:
This week, the Justice Department determined that the
lies that were peddled about me, my family, & @ClintonFdn are without merit.
I couldn’t be more grateful to everyone that stuck with us while we continued to focus on the work. Let’s keep going.
https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2020/annual-fund-m …
I couldn’t be more grateful to everyone that stuck with us while we continued to focus on the work. Let’s keep going.
https://bbis.clintonfoundation.org/2020/annual-fund-m …
TOGETHER, WE CONTINUE PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST
The Clinton Foundation’s record of
exploiting natural disasters to source funds for which they never account is as
long as it is shameless.
Americans across the political spectrum
must push our government authorities to hold operators of the Clinton charity
scam network to account.
“Bleachbit” notwithstanding, overwhelming
evidence of unprosecuted charity frauds dating to Oct. 23, 1997 hides in plain
sight
Check applicable laws, then check facts
for yourselves and remember these words from John Adams:
“Facts are
stubborn things [emphasis
added]; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of
our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
During the 2016 election cycle, the
mainstream media failed to probe the heart of the more
recent Clinton Foundation scandal -- how the Clinton family may have exploited Hillary’s
position as Secretary of State and her standing as presidential frontrunner
through November 2016.
Building fortunes through operating
charities is a monstrous affront to decent, law-abiding people of all political
persuasions, so it is not a partisan thing, here, to attack the Clintons for
their known public record of transgressions.
In fact, a better question might be to
wonder why Democrats, including Bernie Sanders, are not much more insistent
that ongoing Clinton charity scams be fully exposed, and aggressively
prosecuted by state, federal and foreign governments.
Our Russia Collusion Nightmare: All Hillary's Fault?
The
biggest political scandal in the history of the United States. Three
years of constant lies told by government agents, political operatives, and
deceitful news personalities. Thousands of hours of criminal
investigative interviews; thousands of written stories and television segments;
thousands of leaks and insinuations and threats. All to take down
the legitimately elected American president, Donald J. Trump.
Now
that some light is finally revealing just how rotten this whole nonsense has
been from the very beginning, the most maddening aspect of all is the one thing
not said nearly enough: every bit of this frame-up job to hang the American
president for being a Russian agent and traitor to his nation began as a way to
inoculate Hillary Clinton from her largest political vulnerabilities going into
the 2016 campaign.
Aside
from her questionable health and a lifetime of scandal, Hillary had two sizable
liabilities (of her own creation) that threatened her ability to win the
general election: (1) her use of the Clinton Foundation as a vehicle for
laundering bribes from foreign governments and moneyed interests and (2) her
decision to conduct the business of the State Department (as well as to discuss
our nation's most guarded secrets) on an unsecured private email server that
had been hacked by known and unknown foreign governments and adverse
entities. Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash did a remarkable job exposing the Clinton
Foundation as a spectacular pay-to-play operation that had allowed Hillary to
trade the powers of her office for personal aggrandizement (including the sale
of 20% of America's uranium to Russia for, among other things, $145 million
transferred to her foundation). And even though the Obama Justice
Department was doing its best to minimize the revelation of Hillary's gross
breach of national security and slow-walk any repercussions, the American
people were discovering that life-and-death secrets had been entrusted to a
person with such disregard for our well-being that she stored them on a
personal server in a downstairs bathroom.
For
a normal person with a modicum of ethical concern, sense of shame, or patriotic
duty, these crimes would have been more than sufficient to prompt withdrawal
from an election for the country's highest office. This type of
honest self-reflection and private admission of guilt is alien to the Clintons,
though, so what would have represented immovable obstacles to anyone else
became just another set of political variables that had to be neutralized in
her favor.
I
can just imagine the conversation Hillary had with her most trusted advisers —
not the ones with the official titles like Robby Mook and Brian Fallon, whose chief
value lay in their expendable nature and the ease with which Hillary could roll
them up into any unexpected scandal to be disposed with the trash at a future
time of her convenience. I mean the real group of confidants, the
ones who have "the ends justify the means" tattooed on their souls
and have gotten away with more crimes than we'll ever know. If
you're Sid Blumenthal or John Podesta or Cheryl Mills or Marc Elias or Lanny
Davis and you know where some of the bodies are buried along the spectacular
trail of Clinton corruption through the years, then the prospect of a massive
pay-to-play scandal or criminal indictment for mishandling top-secret
intelligence or engaging wittingly or unwittingly in espionage is just another
bump on the long road of progressive relativism and Clinton
nihilism. If Clinton Cash and FBI investigators come knocking, you
simply accuse all your political opponents of being the real grifters and
foreign agents.
That's
exactly what Team Hillary did. They leveled allegations of criminal
bribery at Jeb Bush; they questioned Marco Rubio's loyalty to the United
States; but Donald Trump was the prize. A man who had spent a
lifetime in the exotic world of luxury real estate around the globe while
mixing it up with all kinds of powerful figures in that often shady world was
the ideal mark, and he also happened to be a political novice who the Democrats
universally believed would lose in a landslide of historical dimensions for
political lore long to come. When Paul Manafort joined his team just
before the kickoff to the general election and brought with him a lifetime of
political baggage that included skullduggery around Russia's zone of interest,
it must have seemed as if Christmas had come early for the Clinton team. (Kind
of makes you wonder how coincidental this unforced error really was.)
And
so, after a lifetime in the public eye, starring in a popular television show,
and rubbing elbows with celebrities and politicians of all stripes, Donald
Trump woke up one day to find himself being generally slandered (and libeled)
as a Russian spy by the information merchants who control America's airwaves
and print media. That had to have made him laugh, considering that
the press had spent most of his foray into politics demeaning him as a greedy
capitalist playboy nationalist who selfishly placed America's interests before
those of our common world.
Yes,
before John Brennan devised a global espionage ring to frame President Trump as
a national security risk and enable the FBI to open up counterintelligence
investigations into his political associates; before Jim Comey and Andrew
McCabe attested to false information with the FISA Court; before Robert Mueller
put the screws to General Flynn in order to sink a lifetime defender of America
for political purposes; before President Obama initiated changes to security
classification that opened up scurrilous investigative records on
President-Elect Trump to an exponentially greater number of bureaucrats with
partisan motivations; before Susan Rice left an electronic CYA memorandum at
12:15 P.M. on Inauguration Day of 2017 noting that Sally Yates and James
Clapper and John Brennan and Joe Biden and Jim Comey had all agreed in the Oval
Office with President Obama to continue any investigations "by the
book"; before Samantha Power unmasked hundreds of names picked up during
the course of electronic surveillance that were deemed to somehow implicate the
new president in wrongdoing; even before the Clinton operatives and Fusion GPS
and Christopher Steele first started composing the fan fiction now known as
"the Dossier" — before all of this and everything else we have been
forced to endure for three long years, there was Hillary Clinton, doing what
she and her people know best: accusing her political opponent of the very
crimes she had committed herself.
As
awful as this orchestrated campaign against President Trump has been, it is
absolutely maddening to realize that none of it would have happened had Hillary
Clinton not engaged in one of the greatest pay-for-play operations in American
history while placing our most guarded secrets (as well as the very lives of
our soldiers and civilians) on a silver platter for those governments and
adversaries who wish us the most harm in this world. Three years of
Russian hysteria happened only because of the deep corruption of Hillary
Clinton.
This
scheme of political projection and wicked treachery should go down as a final
reminder that America survives today only because President Trump managed to
prevail against the nearly insurmountable wave of our government's intelligence
agencies, the justice system, media propagandists, and the combined wills of
the Democrats and NeverTrump Republicans intending to swamp him.
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton Foundation
bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
The Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer
raise enough money to cover its expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential
campaign failed to propel her into an office from which she could dispense
political favors. Clinton Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax
years have demonstrated that without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are
interested in supporting it.
The Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in
2018, according to newly released tax
records, marking the second
consecutive year of losses since Hillary Clinton's humiliating defeat to
President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million,
including $24.2 million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the
alleged "charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's
total expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8
million.
The previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of
$16.1 million. In total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million
since Hillary Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in
November 2016.
The contrast with previous years when political favors were a lure
is striking:
The Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249
million) in 2009, the year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's
secretary of state. By 2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2
million in revenue, and went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between 2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total
revenue in excess of $1.1 billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million.
Needless to say, Clinton's stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016
election appears to have had a significant impact on the foundation's ability
to raise money.
US Attorney for Utah, John Huber, has been tasked with
investigating the Clinton Foundation. So far there has not been a single leak
out of his office over its work. That could mean either that they have turned
up nothing, or that the investigation and grand jury are proceeding with the
secrecy that the law demands.
VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal that she's back in the game
because she's selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire
crowd and laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds
of ways for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences,
after all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support
she has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service” into
admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the
top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a
political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists
essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business
support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal
fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid
speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton
Foundation.”
HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the
rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE
BRIBES SUCKING LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came
to power in Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is
long and tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been
to enrich themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about
lying, cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the
Perons of America. They eventually set up a "foundation"
and the money kept rolling in.
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her
PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The
left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her
campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal
gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to
the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of
all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign
chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board
of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA
McCARTHY
Had
Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more
millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors
and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE
PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
“There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He
does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds,”
states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
No comments:
Post a Comment