The mask slips: On a phone call, Obama called Trump a 'fascist' from the start
Just how bad was it in swampville when President Trump was beginning to take off in the polls ahead of the 2016 election?
Well, here's a pretty credible conversation recorded for a documentary intended to tell the election story for the benefit of Hillary Clinton's fans:
Barack Obama called Donald Trump a "fascist" in a phone conversation with Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia during the 2016 presidential election, Kaine says in a video clip featured in an upcoming documentary about Hillary Clinton.Kaine, Clinton's running mate on the Democratic ticket, recounts the call during an exchange with Clinton that was caught on camera in 2016. Kaine's wife, Anne Holton, was also present."President Obama called me last night and said: 'Tim, remember, this is no time to be a purist. You've got to keep a fascist out of the White House,'" Kaine says before adding with a laugh that Obama "knows me and he knows that I could tend to err."Clinton replies, nodding, "I echo that sentiment."She then puts her hands to her chest and says, "But that's really — the weight of our responsibility is so huge."
Weight of responsibility? Almost like Nancy Pelosi with her impeachment gravitas, wearing black, declaring "prayerful" drivel, telling her giggling leftists to stifle it and pretend to be serious while the cameras were on.
Except it's quite possible wretched Hillary and malevolent Obama really did believe it.
Three things stand out about this telling little conversation:
One, Obama is an ideologue. Claiming that Trump is a fascist has zero, repeat zero, basis in reality. Fascists don't cut taxes and regulations, for one, fascists are all in for state takeovers of industry to start, quite similar to what was attempted in the Obama administration, actually.
To call Trump a "fascist" is the statement of a far-left fanatic. "Fascist" is an old-time Communist Party U.S.A. epithet hurled by that crowd since the 1941 Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union, derived from the USSR's party line after Hitler's betrayal of Stalin's Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 1939. Up until that date, Communists and fascists (read: National Socialists) were pretty comfortable with one another. "Fascist" became an epithet hurled by communists all down the Comintern clientele abroad despite both sides being socialist in character. The term was then carried forward by the red diaper babies who first led the "filthy speech" movement of the early 1960s and then the "New Left" of the late 1960s, particularly in its truly crazed fringes such as the Weather Underground movement. Surprise, surprise, that was led by Obama's mentor, Bill Ayers.
Fanatic is right. So despite that "Mr. Cool" exterior, Obama was a fanatic all along.
Two, hurling the term "fascist" at Trump wasn't just a sign of the detritus from the '60s in the Obama persona, it was also the talk at the time of Antifa and other crazies, plotting at the time to disrupt any Trump presidency. It suggests Obama was in tune with these Occupy Wall Street derivatives, the craziest of the crazy on the far left as it was. Someone on the Obama side was in touch with those people, either echoing how they felt, or quite possibly, directing the maniacs. That bears further watching. He was talking then like they talk now, and that kind of talk wasn't common before Trump.
Three, a mask has slipped. Obama maintained that "no drama Obama" persona for the cameras, first staying aloof from the election as it moved through, and later smiling and treating president-elect Trump all nice in public to suggest he was doing a gracious transition. He also portrayed himself repeatedly as a reasonable "moderate." Now it's obvious that all along, he was a far leftist and a churning storm of discontent, desperate to win at any cost. He was speaking like an Antifa-style leftist to Kaine and Hillary Clinton, a desperate man desperate to ensure that Hillary won the election. It also circumstantially supports that Obama was desperately plotting to shut down Trump behind the scenes all along. His minions were doing unmaskings of innocent Americans caught up in intelligence dragnets, for one, quite illegally. Team Obama was beginning to manufacturie the lie that Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election from Hillary Clinton that would reappear in force after Trump unexpectedly won the election. They were paying big dollars for the phony Steele dossier, which even Trump critic Fiona Hill identified as a suspect Russian desinformatsiya magnet. They were paddling as fast as they could under the water surface while presenting a calm, detached persona to the public - and fully disposed to commit mischief because in the world of the far-left, the end justifies the means.
Well, the Kaine call told us a lot about the Obama disposition shortly before Hillary Clinton lost the election to Trump, leaving a fanatic with his hands on a lot of figurative nuclear buttons that he dispatched to stop Trump.
A mask indeed is off, revealing a fanatic.
Image credit: Washington Post shareable YouTube s
Obama spearheads campaign against Sanders’ nomination as Democratic
presidential candidate
Obama panicking about his legacy?
Advises left to pick any Democrat
Obama Seeks Brother of "Chicago Mob Boss" for Top White House Post
How One California Marxist
Is Indoctrinating Millions of School Children
More Voters
Educational
Change
Barack
Obama Launches ‘Redistricting U’ Campaign for ‘Fair Maps’
Sean Gallup/Getty
Images
Former President Barack Obama on Monday unveiled a new initiative to
influence redistricting efforts across the United States.
CHICANO MARXISTS PREPARE FOR BATTLE
WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
CHICANO MARXISTS PREPARE FOR BATTLE
WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
https://sacramentocitizen.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/chicano-marxists-prepare-for-battle-with-trump-administration/
Obama spearheads campaign against Sanders’ nomination as Democratic
presidential candidate
The first votes for the Democratic presidential nomination will
be cast in two months’ time, in the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary.
With former President Barack Obama taking the lead, the Democratic
Party is moving to ensure that issues of social inequality and wealth
distribution are excluded from the elections.
An article in Politico last
week (“Waiting for Obama”) reported that the “Democratic establishment is
counting on [Obama] to stop Trump and, perhaps, stave off Bernie as well.”
While noting that Obama’s public position is that he will
support whatever candidate is nominated, the article states, “There is one potential
exception: Back when Sanders seemed like more of a threat than he does now,
Obama said privately that if Bernie were running away with the nomination,
Obama would speak up to stop him.”
The report conforms to what Obama has said in statements over
the past two weeks to party donors and fundraisers in Washington, DC and
California. He claimed that the American people were opposed to any radical
change. “This is still a country that is less revolutionary than it is
interested in improvement,” Obama said. “They like seeing things improved. But
the average American doesn’t think we have to completely tear down the system
and remake it… They just don’t want to see crazy stuff.”
He continued, “We also have to be rooted in reality and the fact
that voters, including the Democratic voters and certainly persuadable
independents or even moderate Republicans, are not driven by the same views
that are reflected on certain, you know, left-leaning Twitter feeds. Or the
activist wing of our party.”
BLOG: BARACK OBAMA'S BANKSTER INFESTED ADMINISTRATION
SPEARHEADED THE GREATEST TRANSFER OF WEALTH TO THE RICH IN AMERICAN HISTORY!
While he did not name them, the meaning was clear, as the New York Times noted:
“His comments offered an implicit critique of Senators Bernie Sanders and
Elizabeth Warren…”
The concern of the Democratic Party establishment is not over
Sanders and Warren, both of whom are tested political operatives. Rather, they
do not want to run an election that appeals even in a limited way to the
class-based concerns of the vast majority of the population.
Beginning with Obama’s statement that the 2016 election was an
“intramural scrimmage” between two sides of the same team, the Democrats have
sought to redirect popular hostility to Trump behind their militarist,
anti-Russia campaign, the focus of the impeachment drive. This will be combined
with efforts to promote divisions based on race and gender.
Obama was only the most prominent spokesman for a right-wing
campaign throughout the month of November, including commentaries and
editorials in the Times and
the Washington Post (owned
by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos), an op-ed from former Treasury Secretary
Lawrence Summers, and public statements from billionaires Warren Buffett, Bill
Gates, Mark Cuban and Leon Cooperman, all attacking proposals by Warren and
Sanders for a tax on accumulated wealth.
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg went even further, officially
announcing himself as a belated candidate for the Democratic presidential
nomination and funding a $30 million advertising blitz that began last week.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi joined in with an attack on the
health care proposal identified with Sanders and Warren. “I’m not a big fan of
Medicare-for-all,” she said on Bloomberg TV, the cable network controlled by
the billionaire now-candidate. She claimed that “there is a comfort level that
some people have with their current private insurance.”
Both Warren and Sanders have responded by shifting to the right.
Warren has backpedaled on her “Medicare for All” proposal, releasing a “Plan B”
that backtracks on the main component of her campaign.
For his part, Sanders was queried in last month’s Democratic
presidential debate about Obama’s repudiation of revolution. “Is President
Obama wrong?” the moderator asked Sanders. The Vermont senator shelved his
rhetoric about “political revolution” and meekly replied, “No, he’s right. We
don’t have to tear down the system, but we do have to do what the American
people want.”
Both Sanders and Warren accept the fraudulent presentation of
the Obama administration as a “progressive” government that laid the basis for
further social reforms. They make no criticism of Obama’s bailout of Wall Street,
his wage-cutting attacks on auto workers, or his slashing of federal support to
public education and other social programs. They do not address the undeniable
political fact that it was the alignment of the Obama administration with
corporate America that drove sizeable sections of workers to turn their backs
on the Democratic Party and either vote for Trump or stay home on Election Day
in 2016.
Most critically, they support the foreign policy consensus in
the Democratic Party that underlies the campaign to impeach Trump, not for his
real crimes against immigrant workers and the democratic rights of the American
people, but for his transgressions against the demands of the
military-intelligence apparatus in relation to Ukraine, Russia and the Middle East.
Warren has publicly embraced the Trump administration’s efforts
to strangle Venezuela with financial sanctions, while tacitly supporting the
overthrow of Bolivian President Evo Morales by a right-wing US-backed campaign
in which the Bolivian military played the central role. Sanders has referred to
the overthrow of Morales as a “coup,” but offers no alternative to the
aggressive assertion of US imperialist interests around the world, which is
supported by both the Democrats and Republicans.
And like most Democrats, Sanders has criticized Trump’s trade
war policies towards China from the right, demanding even more aggressive
protectionist measures that would only add fuel to the mounting global tensions
that bring with them the danger of a third world war.
The working class cannot defend its social rights to good-paying
jobs, decent schools, medical care and other social services, or fight the
growing danger of imperialist war, by means of the Democratic Party. This
requires the independent mobilization of the working class in both industrial
and political struggle, through strikes, mass demonstrations and the building
of an independent political movement directed against the capitalist system
based on a socialist program.
Obama panicking about his legacy?
Advises left to pick any Democrat
President Obama, who has
yet to endorse anyone for president, has one piece of advice for voters: Pick a
Democrat, any Democrat, doesn't matter who.
PJMedia captures the
sense of panic in one of Obama's addresses to the barons of Silicon
Valley:
"Everybody needs to chill
out about the candidates, but gin up about the prospect of rallying behind
whoever emerges from this process," Obama told the millionaire techies,
according to far-left news channel CNN.
"There will be differences" between them, he added, "but I want
us to make sure that we keep in mind that, relative to the ultimate goal, which
is to defeat a president and a party that has ... taken a sharp turn away from
a lot of the core traditions and values and institutional commitments that
built this country," those differences are "relatively minor."
"The field will
narrow and there's going to be one person, and if that is not your perfect
candidate and there are certain aspects of what they say that you don't agree
with and you don't find them completely inspiring the way you'd like, I don't
care," he went on to say. "Because the choice is so stark and the
stakes are so high that you cannot afford to be ambivalent in this race."
Which is nuts advice to
that audience, given that several of the candidates are all but pledging to put
those companies out of business. Should Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook,
go vote for Elizabeth Warren, who can't stop singling him out as her model bad
guy? It's not exactly in tune with what the Silicon Valley is up against. How
about Bernie Sanders? Should they vote for a guy like that? Some will, but
probably not the ones who know that the Sanders idea is annihilation.
What we have here is
Obama being Obama, always looking out for himself.
The only real reason he
could really be so tin-earred toward his audience is that a Democrat in
place instead of a Republican would be his best hope of saving his legacy.
President Trump's been
dismantling that piece by piece, and any president who manages to stay in power
is going to leave a mark.
The problem with Obama is
that his legacy is built on water. Having rammed through signature legislation
such as Obamacare on strictly partisan lines, and having enacted regulations
such as DACA by executive order after Congress refused to pass his
proposed legislation, dismantling his one-man rule is pretty much a given,
a matter of time, given that pendulums swing for a reason. President Trump's
unusual election was likely a bid to correct Obama's nonpartisan rule by
fiat at least in part, he was only possible because Obama was so extreme.
Historically, only bipartisan bills stand the test of time as power shifts from
one side of the political aisle to the other. Unless your party's rule is
permanent, unpopular fiats are going to get swept aside in favor of better
stuff. That's the real way democracy works. Obama's legacy as I noted here,
was all but certain to be erased as the pendulum swings, and doubly so if
voters give the next party a stronger mandate on a second term.
Obama always dismissed
bipartisanship as Republican recalcitrance, and never attempted to cut deals
with them. He was always the holy one, calling his one man rule things such
as "core traditions and values and institutional commitments that
built this country," as he said above. It's a laughable statement if there
ever was one, given his far-left and Marxist past and associations.
In any case, the
ex-president can see the writing on the wall as Trump surges in the polls, and
most Democratic presidential candidates fall flat on their faces. (How's Joe
Biden doing these days, Barack?) They're all a disaster and he knows they're a
disaster yet they're his only hope for keeping a scintilla of his legacy
intact. So he throws out that desperate plea to vote for anyone, for nothing
more than to beat Trump.
For all of George Bush's
shortcomings, we never saw the man do that.
But Obama's a bit
different.
Color me doubtful that
anyone listens to him.
Obama Seeks Brother of "Chicago Mob Boss" for Top White House Post
The roaches and
con-artist, fake journalist on cable news are all lying about William Daley
being all this and all that, this man is an open borders, down with America,
free trade globalist. MSNBC and Gretta "the Scientology"
Van Susteren from Fox News are knowingly deceiving the public about D. Issa
& his letter to "business owners"=which they made into such a BIG
DAM DEAL, but no one says anything when Barrack Hussein Obama, comes around
with all of these shady bankers, hedge fund managers and Wall St. Tycoons,
which he puts in his cabinet. All of Obama's meeting with Wall
Street asking, "What can I do for you?" is never something covered by
Keith Oberman or Rachel Maddow.
(Bloomberg) -- President
Barack Obama is considering naming William Daley, a JPMorgan Chase & Co.
executive and former U.S. Commerce secretary, to a high-level administration
post, possibly White House chief of staff, people familiar with the matter
said.
BOOK
Obamanomics: How Barack
Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate
Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You
Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE,
Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was
supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big
Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In
Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the
mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather
than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all
while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and
regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.
Congressman Ron Paul
says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read
Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says,
“Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field
guide to the Obama years.”
If you’ve wondered what’s
happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial
sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding
“stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately,
Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s
getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book
names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
Goldman Sachs, GE,
Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was
supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big
Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.
Investigative reporter
Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White
House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering
corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate
America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In
this explosive book, Carney reveals:
* The Great Health Care
Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and
more government control
* The Global Warming
Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain
your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and Wall
Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the
West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
* Stimulating K
Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and
created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the GOP needs to
change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics
Praise for Obamanomics
“The notion that ‘big
business’ is on the side of the free market is one of progressivism’s most
valuable myths. It allows them to demonize corporations by day and get in bed
with them by night. Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best. It
reveals how President Obama is exploiting the big business mythology to
undermine the free market and stick it to entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and
consumers. It’s an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
—Jonha Goldberg, LA Times
columnist and best-selling author
“‘Every time government
gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich.’ With this astute observation, Tim Carney
begins his task of laying bare the Obama administration’s corporatist governing
strategy, hidden behind the president’s populist veneer. This meticulously
researched book is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand how
Washington really works.”
—David Freddoso,
best-selling author of The Case Against Barack Obama
“Every libertarian and
free-market conservative who still believes that large corporations are trusted
allies in the battle for economic liberty needs to read this book, as does
every well-meaning liberal who believes that expansions of the
welfare-regulatory state are done to benefit the common people.”
—Congressman Ron Paul
“It’s understandable for
critics to condemn President Obama for his ‘socialism.’ But as Tim Carney
shows, the real situation is at once more subtle and more sinister. Obamanomics
favors big business while disproportionately punishing everyone else. So-called
progressives are too clueless to notice, as usual, which is why we have Tim
Carney and this book.”
—Thomas E. Woods, Jr., best-selling
author of Meltdown and The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to American History
· Hardcover:
256 pages
· Publisher:
Regnery Press (November 30, 2009)
· Language:
English
· ISBN-10:
1596986123
· ISBN-13:
978-1596986121
"When Obama was still a senator,
he declared at a campaign stop while addressing SEIU, “Before
immigration debates took place in Washington, I spoke with Eliseo
Medina and SEIU members."
How One California Marxist
Is Indoctrinating Millions of School Children
August 22, 2019 Updated: August 22, 2019
Commentary
Democratic
Socialists of America (DSA) is coming for your children.
Not content
with taking over school boards and sending comrades into the teaching
profession, the United States’ largest Marxist group is also writing the
textbooks your children study.
California DSA member Duane Campbell helped write the new
History-Social Science Framework for the state, which was adopted in 2017.
Sacramento-based Campbell, a DSA comrade since at least 1983, is an emeritus
professor of bilingual/multicultural education at California State
University–Sacramento and former chair of the Sacramento DSA. He is also the author of “Choosing Democracy: A Practical Guide to
Multicultural Education.”
According to
Campbell, “Because of California’s large size and market, what goes into
California textbooks frequently also gets written into textbooks around the
nation.”
In the mid-1990s, Campbell was a
contributing editor to Oakland-based Maoist-leaning CrossRoads magazine, which sought to “promote dialogue and build new
alliances among progressives and leftists … to bring diverse Marxist and
socialist traditions to bear, while exploring new strategies and directions for
the progressive political movements.”
In the mid-2000s, Campbell was a
contributor to a Bay Area socialist blog called Educational Justice, described as
being “from a collective of progressive education activists—stuff about
teaching, thinking, parenting, social justice, desegregation,
self-determination, economic justice, music, creativity, and building
progressive movements for our future.”
Other
contributors included Tom Edminster, a teacher’s unionist and DSA member; Karen
Zapata of Teachers 4 Social Justice; and Eric Mar, a Freedom Road Socialist
Organization supporter and, like Campbell, a member of Progressives for Obama.
As a young man, Campbell was one of several
communist or socialist organizers with Cesar
Chavez’s United Farm Workers union, an experience
he now wants to impart to America’s youth.
Campbell has served on DSA’s leadership
body, the National Political Committee, and has also served on the DSA’s Latino
Commission and Anti-Racism Commission. In 2017, Campbell was co-chair of
the DSA Immigrant’s Rights Committee. Campbell is steeped in Marxist racial politics.
More Voters
The DSA’s interest in education is completely political. Inspired by
Italian Communist Party theoretician Antonio Gramsci, DSA seeks to infiltrate
U.S. society’s main opinion-forming institutions to change the popular
consciousness in a socialist direction. In the more short-term, DSA is
committed to both expanding the Latino vote and pushing it to the left to give its
allies in the Democratic Party an unchallengeable majority in national
elections.
Campbell’s DSA comrade, Eliseo Medina, was
also active in the United Farm Workers union under Chavez. Medina transferred
to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), rising to executive vice
president. As one of the most influential advocates for amnesty for illegal immigrants in the country, Medina served
as an informal immigration adviser to then-President Barack Obama.
When Obama was still a senator, he
declared at a campaign stop while
addressing SEIU, “Before immigration
debates took place in Washington, I
spoke with Eliseo Medina and SEIU
members.”
At the America’s Future Now! conference
in Washington on June 2, 2009, Medina addressed attendees on the necessity of
“comprehensive immigration reform.”
“When they
voted in November, they voted overwhelmingly for progressive candidates. Barack
Obama got two out of every three voters that showed up.
“So I think
there’s two things that matter for the progressive community:
“Number one:
If we are to expand this electorate to win, the progressive community needs to
solidly be on the side of immigrants. That will expand and solidify the
progressive coalition for the future. …
“Number two:
[If] we reform the immigration laws, it puts 12 million people on the path to
citizenship and eventually voters. Can you imagine if we have, even the same
ratio, two out of three?
“If we have
eight million new voters … [we] will create a governing coalition for the long
term, not just for an election cycle.”
Campbell wants
to use his influence on the education system to play his part in DSA’s
revolutionary program.
Educational
Change
In the early 2010s, Campbell set up a
network to change the California history and social studies textbooks, which
had mainly been written by objective historians appointed by Gov. Ronald
Reagan.
Wrote Campbell:
“I have spent
more than six years working on this project—and it was well worth it. The important
changes we achieved were produced by years of collective advocacy, lobbying,
letter writing, and organizing. After being blocked in our efforts in 2008, we
created the Mexican American Digital History site, then organized a statewide
network of scholars and community activists to pressure the State Board of
Education.
“At each
stage, we had to explain why this tedious process of changing the Framework was
important. We received assistance from civil rights groups and Latinos in the
Democratic Party. Similar and parallel campaigns were organized within the
Filipino, Hmong, South Asian, and LGBT communities.”
According to
Campbell, this work will result in a new “progressive” path of learning for
California’s school children:
“History and
social science textbooks in public schools in California and most of the nation
are racist, class-biased, and ignore LGBT history. This condition will change
in California in 2017 when new textbooks are adopted.
“Under a
unanimous decision by the California Board of Education made on July 14, 2016,
California students will finally be encouraged to know the history of Latino
civil rights leaders like Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta and Filipino labor
leaders like Larry Itliong, as well as an accurate and inclusive history of
LGBT activists as a part of the history of California and the nation. These
topics are currently substantially absent from public school textbooks.”
That’s right—now young Californians can
learn all about Campbell’s old boss Chavez, a man who trained for six years in Chicago with the father of “community organizing”
himself: Saul Alinsky. They’ll also learn about Chavez’s right-hand woman Dolores Huerta, a longtime DSA comrade
and general communist hang-around.
Chavez worked
with a lot of Communist Party USA supporters, including Filipino labor
organizer Larry Itliong—who will also be profiled in the new curriculum.
This is
supposedly all about fairness and giving minorities equal treatment. Teaching
kids about communists, it seems, will make them better students and more
engaged citizens—especially the more than 1 in 10 students who Campbell claims
are homosexual:
“In the
current books … the 51 percent of students who are Latino, the 11.5 percent who
are Asian, and the estimated 11 percent of students who are LGBT, do not see
themselves as part of history, for many their sense of self is marginalized.
“As I argued
in a prior book, marginalization negatively impacts their connections with
school and their success at school. This has resulted in a nearly 50 percent
dropout rate for Latinos and some Asian groups and LGBT students.”
Campbell then
goes on to reel off a whole list of leftist individuals and the radical events
they inspired, including the occupation of Alcatraz Island in San Francisco Bay
by communist-inspired militants, the communist-inspired American Indian
Movement and the standoff at Wounded Knee in South Dakota, the Marxist-led La
Raza Unida Party, and the communist-led Chicano Moratorium against the Vietnam
War.
And, of
course, the 11 percent of California’s children who are allegedly LGBT
shouldn’t feel left out. Their far-left champions are profiled, too:
“California activists like Harvey Milk and Cleve Jones were part of a broader
movement that emerged in the aftermath of the Stonewall riots, which brought a
new attention to the cause of equal rights for homosexual Americans.”
Coincidentally,
these educational priorities may end up helping DSA’s revolutionary electoral
strategy. According to Campbell:
“School
marginalization also contributes directly to low-level civic engagement. An
accurate history would provide some of these students with a sense of self, of
direction, of purpose. History and social science classes should help young
people acquire and learn to use the skills, knowledge, and attitudes that will
prepare them to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives. …
“And, while
California and the nation have a general problem with low civic engagement
among young people, it is also true that the state has a very specific problem
with the rate of Latino and Asian voter participation in civic life.
“Rates of
voting and voter registration provide a window into civic engagement. The
proportion of state voter registration that is Latino and Asian has remained
far below the proportions of these groups in the state’s overall population. …
“We know that
we can do better. California has the largest school population of any state,
with more than 6,226,000 students in school in 2015, more than 11 percent of
the United States total.”
So, not only will millions of California
school children be moved to the left by Campbell’s pro-communist propaganda, but they
will also likely vote in significantly higher numbers.
This will, of
course, consolidate the left’s already iron-grip on California politics, but
will likely affect other states as well.
One
well-placed Marxist operative can negatively influence millions, even hundreds
of millions, of people.
Every
pro-American school board in the country should immediately review and probably
ban all history and social studies textbooks coming out of California.
Trevor Loudon is an author, filmmaker, and
public speaker from New Zealand. For more than 30 years, he has researched
radical left, Marxist, and terrorist movements and their covert influence on
mainstream politics.
Views expressed in this article are the
opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch
Times.
Barack
Obama Launches ‘Redistricting U’ Campaign for ‘Fair Maps’
27 Aug 2019343
1:52
Former President Barack Obama on Monday unveiled a new initiative to
influence redistricting efforts across the United States.
The
initiative, Redistricting U, will send activists to provide free training and
tools to volunteers involved in redistricting efforts and guide groups on
how to “be leaders in the movement for fair maps.”
“Training is
at the heart of organizing. It’s why I’ve always made it a priority – from my
2008 campaign until now,” Obama wrote in a tweet announcing Redistricting
U, which is part of the All On The Line campaign.
In
February, Obama’s Organizing For Action and former Attorney General
Eric Holder’s National Redistricting Action Fund joined forces to create the All On The Line
campaign — aimed at thwarting the use of so-called gerrymandering across the
country.
Training is at the heart
of organizing. It’s why I’ve always made it a priority – from my 2008 campaign
until now. And it’s why I’m proud to announce @allontheline’s in-person training initiative,
Redistricting U. Join us: http://allontheline.org/redistrictingu
“The
movement for fair maps will determine the course of progress on every issue we
care about for the next decade,” Obama said. “And we can’t wait to begin
organizing when the redistricting process starts in 2021. We need to build this
movement from the ground up – right now.”
“The
movement for fair maps will determine the course of progress on every issue we
care about for the next decade. And we can’t wait to begin organizing when the
redistricting process starts in 2021. We need to build this movement from the
ground up — right now,” Obama said in a
statement on the initiative’s website.
“It’s
why I made it a priority in my 2008 campaign and throughout our larger movement
for change in the years since,” the former president added.
The
initiative is part of a larger push by the Obamas for voting reform. In
2018, former first lady Michelle Obama created the
When We All Vote initiative aimed at increasing voter turnout across the
country.
Xavier Becerra
As Fox News pointed out in a
2003 interview on the Sean
Hannitty Show, Becerra has a devout relationship with MEChA, as well as The Fabian Society. But don’t go looking
for the clip; it is apparent Becerra’s people have been busy at work cleaning
up his inline reputation and record. KATY GRIMES
CHICANO MARXISTS PREPARE FOR BATTLE
WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
CHICANO MARXISTS PREPARE FOR BATTLE
WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
https://sacramentocitizen.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/chicano-marxists-prepare-for-battle-with-trump-administration/
As Chicanas
and Chicanos of Aztlán, we are a nationalist movement of Indigenous Gente that
lay claim to the land that is ours by birthright. As a nationalist movement we
seek to free our people from the exploitation of an oppressive society that
occupies our land. Thus, the principle of nationalism serves to preserve the
cultural traditions of La Familia de La Raza and promotes our identity as a
Chicana/Chicano Gente.
By Katy Grimes and Megan Barth
CA Marxists Ramping Up Destabilization of the Golden State
Immediately following the November election, California Governor
Jerry Brown appointed U.S. Rep. Xavier Becerra (D) to replace State Attorney
General Kamala Harris, who won election to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the
retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer.
Many wonder why Xavier Becerra was chosen by Brown. But all
anyone has to do is peek into the radical California Legislature, and
fanatical Gov. Jerry Brown, to see the trend of militant Marxist,
Socialist, Jesuit, Liberation Theology, Latino activism on the increase.
The goal by these extremists in California is to push
the state, and eventually the country to such a crisis, a reorganization
is the only cure. That is what Communists do. Modern day “Progressives” as they
like to be called, like Brown and Becerra, refer to themselves as
Multiculturalists and Progressives. But as history very clearly demonstrates,
using Marxism as the cure to anything in society is a very dark
fairytale.
The term “progressive” is simply another
way of saying “socialist” or “Marxist;” But it’s as important to recognize how
liberation theology factors into the radical Latino lawmakers: In Latin
America, the big enemy is not Marxism, it is capitalism. And the main enemy of
liberation theology, according to its founder, the Rev. Gustavo Gutierrez of
Peru, and many of its adherents, is the United States–Michael Novak, the author of the 1984 ”Freedom With Justice: Catholic Social Thought
and Liberal Institutions.” Novak describes liberation theology as
“gaining its excitement from flirting with Marxist thought and speech.”
Xavier Becerra
As Fox News pointed out in a
2003 interview on the Sean
Hannitty Show, Becerra has a devout relationship with MEChA, as well as The Fabian Society. But don’t go
looking for the clip; it is apparent Becerra’s people have been busy at work cleaning
up his inline reputation and record.
“I got to be the first in my
family to go to college” thanks to MEChA, Becerra said.
Hannity repeatedly pressed
Becerra on why he would belong to a group that preaches racial discrimination,
prompting the Bustamente backer to complain, “Are you calling me a racist?”
When the Fox host pointed out
that MEChA favors the return of California to Mexico, Becerra still declined to
criticize the group, saying, “I got a lot of help from people in the
organization who have promoted education for kids and who continue to do that.
… What I know is what they do.”
MEChA is a Hispanic separatist organization (400 chapters
nationwide and in many high schools) that encourages anti-American activities,
civil disobedience, and romanticizes Mexican claims to the “lost Territories”
of California and the Southwestern United States, in a Chicano country called
“Aztlan.” The official national symbol of MEChA is an eagle holding a
machete-like weapon and a stick of dynamite.
The Fabian Society and Fabian
Socialism uses the teachings of John Maynard Keynes as their
catechism of political economy. Like Marxism, it embraced the idea of a
Communist Utopia, where the State owned everything and controlled every aspect
of the public’s lives. They have installed Fabian Socialism and Keynesism as the new faith,
both in the Universities and in Government bureaucracy. Keynes supported
statism and socialism, and managed and planning economies. U.S.
President Barack Obama has long advocated the use of Keynesian
economic concepts — despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent,
a fraud, and accused of being a pedophile.
These groups have worked
diligently behind the scenes to implement their Socialist policies
into our government, labor unions and throughout academia. They have infected
the working class, demanding higher and higher wages, resulting often in
welfare and other government handouts once their employers are ruined.
They use illegal
immigrants as messengers of their ideology, demeaning patriotism,
and America. And they have manipulated the political process so that only
those candidates well-versed in Marxism receive the attention of the
corporate Media.
Illegal Immigration and Marxism
Even though the law doesn’t allow them to vote, illegal
immigrants are changing the landscape of the U.S. government, especially in
California, by impacting the census’ through mass migration. California
allows illegal aliens to vote.
Former Mechista Rep. Xavier
Becerra, the U.S. congressman for California’s 31st District, says what
all leftist Latino lawmakers say: their (illegal) constituents still pay taxes
and contribute to society, therefore
they should vote. — “An individual doesn’t have to be a citizen to pay taxes –
you pay taxes if you work in this country, you pay taxes if you purchase
something,” Becerra said.
Led by Los Angeles County Federation
of Labor head Maria Elena Durazo, a group of
socialist and Communist California labor officials and Democrat Party
operatives created a program to target Latinos and immigrants (illegal and
legal) to permanently drive California politics far to the left, Democrat
political consultant Richie Ross wrote in CalBuzz in
2010. Ross openly boasts of targeting the Latino community’s fear of
anti-illegal immigration measures, to drive the community even further into the
arms of the Democratic Party.
In 1994, then-Governor Pete Wilson
put Proposition 187 on the ballot. It was called the nation’s first
anti-immigrant initiative, but in fact the goal of Proposition 187 was to
make illegal aliens ineligible for public benefits including public social
services, public health care services, and public school education. It came in
the middle of a deep recession in California and was popular partly because the
fiscal estimate from the California Legislative
Analyst’s Office said that it would save
the state about $200 million/year.
Latinos and Communists
The two most significant Marxist
groups in the United States, the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, are both committed to increasing the Latino vote in order to
give Democrats a permanent electoral majority.
Maria Elena Durazo,Los Angeles County Federation of Labor head,
is closely associated with both groups. She is is also well connected
to former LA Mayor and Gubernatorial hopeful Antonia Villaraigosa, as well as
former California State Senator Gil Cedillo, both long time
immigration activists.
“Durazo, Villaraigosa and Cedillo,
all trained under legendary Los Angles Communist Party USA activist,
Democratic Party activist and “immigration reform” pioneer Bert Corona,”
Trevor Loudon wrote in 2013. All three have
long ties to both the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of
America, and coincidentally were all prominent California supporters of
presidential candidate Barack Obama and long time ally of both the Communists and DSA.
(former mayor of Mexico’s second
largest city of Los Angeles) Villaraigosa has a long history with MEChA. As a
student, he headed the UCLA chapter of MEChA, but left UCLA six weeks before
graduation to become a full-time organizer with Corona’s Centro de Action Social Autonoma.
Another radical activist isRep. Luis
Gutierrez (D-IL), a co-sponsor of the 2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Gutierrez, a former member of the
Marxist-Leninist Puerto Rican Socialist Party, chairs the Immigration Task Force of the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus. Longtime amnesty activists Gutierrez and Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), both members of the Congressional Progressive
Caucus, worked on the amnesty effort.
Communists seek to use amnestied illegals to build a “permanent progressive
majority.” Most thinking Americans know that Democrats only care about illegals
for the winning voting bloc they can provide, but most are unaware that this
idea was hatched and developed by the American Communist Party, which Richie
Ross clearly explains in his op ed:
The campaigns we developed
broke new ground, organized new union workers, and increased the political
impact Latino voters have had on California politics – simultaneously tripling
their number of registered voters, increasing the Democratic share of that vote
by 50%, and doubling the percentage of the total votes cast in California from
Latinos.
Through the rest of the 1990′s
our campaigns focused on legislative races in Los Angeles. We
succeeded. But it was all small.
In 2000, our message was
controversial (until it worked). “If you want to make a difference,
voting isn’t enough. Don’t bother voting unless you sign our pledge to
get 100% of your family to vote.” Latino turnout rose… and accounted for
14% of the votes cast according to the State’s voter registration and voting
history records.
The Enemies Within
Trevor Loudon’s 2013 book, Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the
U.S. Congress, “profiles fourteen Senators and more than fifty
Representatives. Their ties to Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of
America, Workers World Party, the Institute for Policy Studies, Council for a
Livable World and other radical anti-American organizations.”
Loudon identifies Bert Corona, as the “Communist Father of the
‘Immigrants Rights’ movement” in 1960. In 1964, Corona, Cesar Chavez and future
Democratic Socialists of America member Dolores Huerta forced Congress to end
the guest worker “Bracero” program. Later, Corona sought ways to address
“problems confronting Mexicans in the United States who had no visas or
citizenship documents” – in other words, illegal aliens – including “how to
defend persons detained by immigration authorities and how to help immigrants
acquire disability and unemployment insurance and welfare.”
Loudon writes:
On March 11, 1998, Los Angeles Democratic
Socialists of America leader Steve Tarzynski wrote an email to another
Los Angeles DSA leader Harold Meyerson.
Tarzynski listed 25 people he
thought should be on an “A-list” of “25 or so leaders/activists/intellectuals
and/or “eminent persons” who would gather periodically to theorize/strategize
about how to rebuild a progressive movement in our metropolitan area that could
challenge for power.”
Tarzynski listed himself, Harold Meyerson, Karen Bass, Sylvia Castillo, Gary Phillips, Joe Hicks, Richard Rothstein, Steve Cancian, Larry Frank, Torie Osborn, Rudy Acuna, Aris Anagnos, Abby Arnold, Carl Boggs, Blase Bonpane, Rick Brown, Stanley Sheinbaum, Alice Callahan, Jim Conn, Peter Dreier, Maria Elena Durazo, Miguel Contreras, Mike Davis, Bill Gallegos, Bob Gottlieb, Kent Wong, Russell Jacoby, Bong Hwan Kim, Paula Litt (and Barry Litt, with a question mark), Peter Olney, Derek Shearer, Clancy Sigal and Anthony Thigpenn.
Included in a suggested elected
officials sub-group were Mark Ridley-Thomas, Gloria Romero, Jackie Goldberg, Gil Cedillo, Tom Hayden, Antonio Villaraigosa, Paul Rosenstein and Congressmen Xavier Becerra, Henry Waxman and Maxine Waters.
In further preparation for battle, the California legislature
just hired former Attorney General, Eric Holder. “Having the former attorney
general of the United States brings us a lot of firepower in order to prepare
and safeguard the values of the people of California.” Kevin de Leon, the
Democratic leader of the Senate, said in an interview. “This means we are very,
very serious.”
Very serious, and very Marxist, indeed.
Part 2 of this series will be
published next we
As Chicanas
and Chicanos of Aztlán, we are a nationalist movement of Indigenous Gente that
lay claim to the land that is ours by birthright. As a nationalist movement we
seek to free our people from the exploitation of an oppressive society that
occupies our land. Thus, the principle of nationalism serves to preserve the
cultural traditions of La Familia de La Raza and promotes our identity as a
Chicana/Chicano Gente.
By Katy Grimes and Megan Barth
CA Marxists Ramping Up Destabilization of the Golden State
Immediately following the November election, California Governor
Jerry Brown appointed U.S. Rep. Xavier Becerra (D) to replace State Attorney
General Kamala Harris, who won election to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the
retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer.
Many wonder why Xavier Becerra was chosen by Brown. But all
anyone has to do is peek into the radical California Legislature, and
fanatical Gov. Jerry Brown, to see the trend of militant Marxist,
Socialist, Jesuit, Liberation Theology, Latino activism on the increase.
The goal by these extremists in California is to push
the state, and eventually the country to such a crisis, a reorganization
is the only cure. That is what Communists do. Modern day “Progressives” as they
like to be called, like Brown and Becerra, refer to themselves as
Multiculturalists and Progressives. But as history very clearly demonstrates,
using Marxism as the cure to anything in society is a very dark
fairytale.
The term “progressive” is simply
another way of saying “socialist” or “Marxist;” But it’s as important to
recognize how liberation theology factors into the radical Latino lawmakers: In
Latin America, the big enemy is not Marxism, it is capitalism. And the main
enemy of liberation theology, according to its founder, the Rev. Gustavo
Gutierrez of Peru, and many of its adherents, is the United States–Michael
Novak, the author of the 1984 ”Freedom With Justice: Catholic Social Thought
and Liberal Institutions.” Novak describes liberation theology as
“gaining its excitement from flirting with Marxist thought and speech.”
Xavier Becerra
As Fox News pointed out in a
2003 interview on the Sean
Hannitty Show, Becerra has a devout relationship with MEChA, as well as The Fabian Society. But don’t go
looking for the clip; it is apparent Becerra’s people have been busy at work
cleaning up his inline reputation and record.
“I got to be the first in my
family to go to college” thanks to MEChA, Becerra said.
Hannity repeatedly pressed
Becerra on why he would belong to a group that preaches racial discrimination,
prompting the Bustamente backer to complain, “Are you calling me a racist?”
When the Fox host pointed out
that MEChA favors the return of California to Mexico, Becerra still declined to
criticize the group, saying, “I got a lot of help from people in the
organization who have promoted education for kids and who continue to do that.
… What I know is what they do.”
MEChA is a Hispanic separatist organization (400 chapters
nationwide and in many high schools) that encourages anti-American activities,
civil disobedience, and romanticizes Mexican claims to the “lost Territories”
of California and the Southwestern United States, in a Chicano country called
“Aztlan.” The official national symbol of MEChA is an eagle holding a
machete-like weapon and a stick of dynamite.
The Fabian Society and Fabian
Socialism uses the teachings of John Maynard Keynes as their
catechism of political economy. Like Marxism, it embraced the idea of a
Communist Utopia, where the State owned everything and controlled every aspect
of the public’s lives. They have installed Fabian Socialism and Keynesism as the new faith,
both in the Universities and in Government bureaucracy. Keynes supported
statism and socialism, and managed and planning economies. U.S.
President Barack Obama has long advocated the use of Keynesian
economic concepts — despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent,
a fraud, and accused of being a pedophile.
These groups have worked
diligently behind the scenes to implement their Socialist policies
into our government, labor unions and throughout academia. They have infected
the working class, demanding higher and higher wages, resulting often in welfare
and other government handouts once their employers are ruined. They use illegal immigrants as
messengers of their ideology, demeaning patriotism, and America. And
they have manipulated the political process so that only those candidates
well-versed in Marxism receive the attention of the corporate Media.
Illegal Immigration and Marxism
Even though the law doesn’t allow them to vote, illegal
immigrants are changing the landscape of the U.S. government, especially in
California, by impacting the census’ through mass migration. California
allows illegal aliens to vote.
Former Mechista Rep. Xavier
Becerra, the U.S. congressman for California’s 31st District, says what
all leftist Latino lawmakers say: their (illegal) constituents still pay taxes
and contribute to society, therefore
they should vote. — “An individual doesn’t have to be a citizen to pay taxes –
you pay taxes if you work in this country, you pay taxes if you purchase something,”
Becerra said.
Led by Los Angeles County Federation
of Labor head Maria Elena Durazo, a group of
socialist and Communist California labor officials and Democrat Party
operatives created a program to target Latinos and immigrants (illegal and
legal) to permanently drive California politics far to the left, Democrat
political consultant Richie Ross wrote in CalBuzz in
2010. Ross openly boasts of targeting the Latino community’s fear of
anti-illegal immigration measures, to drive the community even further into the
arms of the Democratic Party.
In 1994, then-Governor Pete Wilson put
Proposition 187 on the ballot. It was called the nation’s first
anti-immigrant initiative, but in fact the goal of Proposition 187 was to
make illegal aliens ineligible for public benefits including public social
services, public health care services, and public school education. It came in
the middle of a deep recession in California and was popular partly because the
fiscal estimate from the California Legislative
Analyst’s Office said that it would save
the state about $200 million/year.
Latinos and Communists
The two most significant Marxist
groups in the United States, the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, are both committed to increasing the Latino vote in order to
give Democrats a permanent electoral majority.
Maria Elena Durazo,Los Angeles County Federation of Labor head,
is closely associated with both groups. She is is also well connected
to former LA Mayor and Gubernatorial hopeful Antonia Villaraigosa, as well as
former California State Senator Gil Cedillo, both long time
immigration activists.
“Durazo, Villaraigosa and Cedillo,
all trained under legendary Los Angles Communist Party USA activist,
Democratic Party activist and “immigration reform” pioneer Bert Corona,”
Trevor Loudon wrote in 2013. All three have
long ties to both the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of
America, and coincidentally were all prominent California supporters of
presidential candidate Barack Obama and long time ally of both the Communists and DSA.
(former mayor of Mexico’s second
largest city of Los Angeles) Villaraigosa has a long history with MEChA. As a
student, he headed the UCLA chapter of MEChA, but left UCLA six weeks before
graduation to become a full-time organizer with Corona’s Centro de Action Social Autonoma.
Another radical activist isRep. Luis
Gutierrez (D-IL), a co-sponsor of the 2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Gutierrez, a former member of the
Marxist-Leninist Puerto Rican Socialist Party, chairs the Immigration Task Force of the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus. Longtime amnesty activists Gutierrez and Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), both members of the Congressional Progressive
Caucus, worked on the amnesty effort.
Communists seek to use amnestied illegals to build a “permanent
progressive majority.” Most thinking Americans know that Democrats only care
about illegals for the winning voting bloc they can provide, but most are
unaware that this idea was hatched and developed by the American Communist
Party, which Richie Ross clearly explains in his op ed:
The campaigns we developed
broke new ground, organized new union workers, and increased the political
impact Latino voters have had on California politics – simultaneously tripling
their number of registered voters, increasing the Democratic share of that vote
by 50%, and doubling the percentage of the total votes cast in California from
Latinos.
Through the rest of the 1990′s
our campaigns focused on legislative races in Los Angeles. We
succeeded. But it was all small.
In 2000, our message was
controversial (until it worked). “If you want to make a difference,
voting isn’t enough. Don’t bother voting unless you sign our pledge to
get 100% of your family to vote.” Latino turnout rose… and accounted for
14% of the votes cast according to the State’s voter registration and voting
history records.
The Enemies Within
Trevor Loudon’s 2013 book, Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the
U.S. Congress, “profiles fourteen Senators and more than fifty
Representatives. Their ties to Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of
America, Workers World Party, the Institute for Policy Studies, Council for a
Livable World and other radical anti-American organizations.”
Loudon identifies Bert Corona, as the “Communist Father of the ‘Immigrants
Rights’ movement” in 1960. In 1964, Corona, Cesar Chavez and future Democratic
Socialists of America member Dolores Huerta forced Congress to end the guest
worker “Bracero” program. Later, Corona sought ways to address “problems
confronting Mexicans in the United States who had no visas or citizenship
documents” – in other words, illegal aliens – including “how to defend persons
detained by immigration authorities and how to help immigrants acquire
disability and unemployment insurance and welfare.”
Loudon writes:
On March 11, 1998, Los Angeles Democratic
Socialists of America leader Steve Tarzynski wrote an email to another
Los Angeles DSA leader Harold Meyerson.
Tarzynski listed 25 people he
thought should be on an “A-list” of “25 or so leaders/activists/intellectuals
and/or “eminent persons” who would gather periodically to theorize/strategize
about how to rebuild a progressive movement in our metropolitan area that could
challenge for power.”
Tarzynski listed himself, Harold Meyerson, Karen Bass, Sylvia Castillo, Gary Phillips, Joe Hicks, Richard Rothstein, Steve Cancian, Larry Frank, Torie Osborn, Rudy Acuna, Aris Anagnos, Abby Arnold, Carl Boggs, Blase Bonpane, Rick Brown, Stanley Sheinbaum, Alice Callahan, Jim Conn, Peter Dreier, Maria Elena Durazo, Miguel Contreras, Mike Davis, Bill Gallegos, Bob Gottlieb, Kent Wong, Russell Jacoby, Bong Hwan Kim, Paula Litt (and Barry Litt, with a question mark), Peter Olney, Derek Shearer, Clancy Sigal and Anthony Thigpenn.
Included in a suggested elected
officials sub-group were Mark Ridley-Thomas, Gloria Romero, Jackie Goldberg, Gil Cedillo, Tom Hayden, Antonio Villaraigosa, Paul Rosenstein and Congressmen Xavier Becerra, Henry Waxman and Maxine Waters.
In further preparation for battle, the California legislature
just hired former Attorney General, Eric Holder. “Having the former attorney
general of the United States brings us a lot of firepower in order to prepare
and safeguard the values of the people of California.” Kevin de Leon, the
Democratic leader of the Senate, said in an interview. “This means we are very,
very serious.”
Very serious, and very Marxist, indeed.
Part 2 of this series will be
published next we
No comments:
Post a Comment