When Biden took office, one of his first acts was the elimination of our border security. Like a power-hungry dictator, Biden simply decided to ignore our immigration laws. His catastrophic border policy resulted in untold millions of unidentified foreign citizens from around the world pouring into our country. Its impact is now being felt in cities across the country. The worst is yet to come. PETER LEMISKA - AND WE'RE ALREADY THERE!!!
Monday, January 27, 2020
Pseudo Christian and Poster Boy for Planned Parenthood Pete Buttigieg and the Baby Butchers
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS THE NATION RIGGED TO PAY OUT HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS FOR THEIR ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE AND THEN BUTCHER HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF UNBORN
Hispandering
Buttigieg: 'Undocumented Immigrants Are Taxpayers' Who 'Are Subsidizing the
Rest of Us'….. For real?!?
Los
Angeles County alone hands Mexican anchor baby breeders more than a BILLION in
welfare. This same Mex-occupied county has a Mexican tax-free underground
economy estimated to be in excess of $2 BILLION.
As Breitbart News has reported, U.S. households
headed by foreign-born residents use nearly twice the welfare of households
headed by native-born Americans.
*
Simultaneously, illegal immigration next year is on track
to soar to the highest level in a decade, with a potential 600,000
border crossers expected.
*
“More than 750 million people want to migrate to another country
permanently, according to Gallup research published Monday, as 150 world
leaders sign up to the controversial UN global compact which critics say makes
migration a human right.” VIRGINIA HALE
* For example, a DACA amnesty would cost American taxpayers about
$26 billion, more than the border wall, and that
does not include the money taxpayers would have to fork up to subsidize the
legal immigrant relatives of DACA illegal aliens.
Cardinal Burke: No Catholic Can Justify Policies That Promote Abortion and Biden Consistently Does
Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, an American and a judge at the Vatican's highest court, said that no "devout Catholic" can support abortion or vote for pro-abortion legislation, and stressed that presidential contender Joe Biden "has a consistent record of being pro-abortion."
During FNC's The Story With Martha MacCallum, prior to Friday's March for Life in Washington, D.C., MacCallum asked the cardinal, "You've spoken out about Joe Biden, whose running for the Democratic nomination, Catholic, that he shouldn't receive Communion because he is pro-choice, and has said that privately he believes that abortion is wrong but that he stands by Roe v. Wade. What do you say about that decision?"
Cardinal Burke replied, "Well, no devout Catholic, no practicing Catholic can be in favor of abortion, can justify voting for legislation policies that promote abortion, and he has a consistent record of being pro-abortion."
"And it's not that he -- this isn't a question of a confessional belief," said Burke. "This has to do with the natural law. The first precept of natural law is the defense of human life."
Burke continued, "And so, you can't say why privately I think it's wrong -- imagining he means by that as a Catholic he thinks it's wrong -- but then in his public life that he can act as if it's not morally evil."
"It's one of the greatest moral evils," said the cardinal.
Martha MacCallum also asked Cardinal Burke what he thought about President Donald Trump participating in the March for Life.
Joe Biden and the former president of Planned Parenthood, America's largest abortion provider, Cecile Richards. (Screenshot)
The cardinal said, "I think it's wonderful news. It couldn't be anything more important for a nation than to rather respect for human life. And that the president himself would be witness to this. It's really, it's a wonderful moment."
Trump "agrees with those of us who are working and fighting to restore the respect for the dignity of human life," said Burke. "It's not a political issue. It's a question of agreeing about a fundamental truth."
A baby murdered by saline-injection abortion. (Priests for Life)
"The fact that I can praise the president for this doesn't mean that I praise him for everything else that he says and does," said Burke. "So, this kind of -- this is making a political issue out of something that's fundamental and moral issue."
New danger: Younger voters not jazzed about Democrats, Yang 8%, Buttigieg 3%
The 2020 Democratic presidential candidates are falling short of former President Barack Obama’s support among younger voters, raising a new hurdle to the party’s bid to dump President Trump.
A new poll of voters under 30 — millennials and Generation Z — have also abandoned younger candidates in the race, such as former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, favoring the oldest in the race, Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden.
Forbes/Zogby poll
The Forbes Under 30 Poll, conducted by John Zogby Strategies, found that Sanders is the favorite of younger voters at 32%. Biden is second at 16%. Andrew Yang is at 8%. Buttigieg is last at 3%, tied with Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.
The analysis included a warning about the level of support younger voters have for the Democrats. “Any of these candidates is going to need to shore up young, undecided voters if he or she is going to beat Trump: Barack Obama carried 66% and 60% of young voters in 2008 and 2012, respectively,” said the Forbes report.
The survey conducted candidate matchups with Trump, and Sanders came close to Obama, beating Trump 58% to 34%.
It’s a pattern that played out in the 2016 election with Hillary Clinton, winning 55% of the younger vote.
WATCH: Buttigieg Has a Disgusting Response to a Pro-Life Democratic Woman
Former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg told a pro-life woman in Iowa she had no place in the Democratic Party. The comment came during a town hall with Fox News' Chris Wallace in Des Moines, Iowa when a voter asked Buttigieg if he supported a change in the party's language.
"I am a proud pro-life Democrat, so do you want the support of pro-life Democrats, Democratic voters? There's about 21 million of us," voter Kristen Day asked Buttigieg. "And, if so, would you support more moderate platform language in the Democratic Party to ensure that the party of diversity and inclusion really does include everybody?"
"Well, I respect where you're coming from and I hope to earn your vote, but I'm not going to try to earn your vote by tricking you," he replied with a smile. "I am pro-choice and I believe that a woman ought to be able to make that decision."
The crowd applauded and Buttigieg attempted to spin his answers.
"Here's what I can tell you – I know that the difference in opinion that you and I have is one that we have come by honestly and the best that I can offer – and it may win your vote, if not I understand – the best that I can offer is that if we can't agree on where to draw the line, the next best thing we can do is agree on who should draw the line," he explained. "And, in my view, it's the woman who's faced with that decision in her own life."
The crowd applauded again and Wallace reminded Buttigieg of one important tidbit: President Donald Trump made history on Friday when he became the first president to address the annual March for Life rally in Washington, D.C.
"I'm curious, Kristen, were you satisfied with the mayor's answer?" Wallace asked.
The voter replied, saying she was unsatisfied with Buttigieg's response. He failed to answer the second part of her question, which is whether or not he would support a change in the party's language and platform.
"And the second part of the Democratic platform contains language that basically says we don't belong, we have no part in the party because it says abortion should be legal up to nine months, that the government should pay for it and there's nothing that says people have a diversity of views on this issue should be included in the party," the voter explained.
Kristen reminded Buttigieg that back in 1999 the Democratic Party platform had language that recognized that people have various views on abortion "but we're a big tent party that includes everbody."
She reiterated the second part of her question. He didn't come out and directly say "no" but his response could be summed up that way.
"Well, I support the position of my party, that this kind of medical care needs to be available to everyone and I support the Roe v. Wade framework that holds that early in pregnancy there are few restrictions and late in pregnancy there are very few exceptions," he responded with a smile. "And again, the best I can offer is we may disagree on that very important issue and, hopefully, we'll be able to partner on other issues."
By Michael W. Chapman | January 27, 2020 | 10:57am EST
No comments:
Post a Comment