“And
then we have to get to work on the healing of our homeland, repairing the many
social and cultural injuries and injustices caused by turbo-capitalism.”
WHILE THE
CRONY BANKSTERS LOOTED AND PLUNDERED WITH IMPUNITY, THE GLOBALIST DEMS WERE
HANDING OUR BORDERS OVER TO THE MEX INVADERS!
Yes, Luttwak’s was a lonely voice in
1994. And yet he knew that he was on to something; in 1998 he published
the equally prescient Turbo-Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy. Describing the contemporary system,
he noted, “It enriches industrializing poor countries, impoverishes the
semi-affluent majority in rich countries, and greatly adds to the incomes of
the top 1 percent on both sides who are managing the arbitrage.”
In the memorable words of Stephen K. Bannon, head honcho at the Trump presidential campaign and then for
a time the top strategist in the Trump White House, “The globalists
gutted the American working class and created a middle class in Asia.”
THE FRIGHTENING TAKE DOWN OF AMERICA
BY THE CRIMINAL FAMILIES OF BUSH, CLINTON AND OBAMA
Virgil:
How Bill Clinton and Neoliberal Trade Policies Led to the Rise of Fascism
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2020/01/04/virgil-how-bill-clinton-and-neoliberal-trade-policies-led-to-the-rise-of-fascism/
4 Jan 20202,346
14:11
If Virgil told you about an article
arguing that the current system can’t handle the challenges of
globalization—pointing to “the completely unprecedented personal economic
insecurity of working people, from industrial workers and white-collar clerks
to medium-high managers”—you might be inclined to react as follows: “That’s old
news. I’ve read a hundred
articles making that point, again and again, over the last few years—quite a
few of them, in fact, at Breitbart News.”
Okay, but what if Virgil told you that
this particular article was written in…1994? As in, a full quarter-century
ago? In other words, way ahead of its time?
It’s worth recalling that back in
1994, in the wake of the end of the Cold War, the elites were in love with
globalization; they were avidly consuming utopian books such as The
Borderless World, The End of History, and The Twilight
of Sovereignty.
And yes, 1994 was the year that the
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) went into effect. As President
Bill Clinton said as he signed the trade
treaty, “NAFTA means jobs. American jobs, and good-paying American
jobs.” In fact, Clinton mentioned the word “jobs” a full 50 times
in that speech. Indeed, all that repetition might make one think that the
42nd president was trying really hard to convince Americans
that he was telling the truth about their jobs.
BLOG:
THE CLINTONS HAVE FROM DAY ONE BEEN SERVANTS OF BIG BANKS AND LA RAZA, THE MEX
FASCIST PARTY THEY ENDLESSLY HISPANDER TO
Interestingly, as Clinton spoke in
support of the trade deal, he was joined at the podium by former presidents
Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush; in other words, at the elite level, support
for NAFTA was virtually unanimous. Everything would be wonderful, we were
assured, if the globalists got their way.
Yet back then, one observer was
having none of this giddy optimism. In April 1994, veteran D.C.
think-tanker Edward Luttwak, writing in the London
Review of Books, argued that trade deals such
as NAFTA were hollowing out Middle America—and that the elite didn’t either
notice or care: “Neither the moderate Right nor the moderate Left even
recognizes, let alone offers any solution for, the central problem of our days:
the completely unprecedented personal economic insecurity of working people,
from industrial workers and white-collar clerks to medium-high managers.”
Luttwak’s point was that
globalization and trade were a threat to the cultural and economic structures
of each and every developed country. That is, long-standing and intricate
systems of work and life were now being exposed to the “tidal waves of change
in the global economic ocean.”
Defenders of such planetary
tidal-waving said that it was inevitable, given that countries such as Mexico
and China were entering the world economy—and that as they did so, of course
they would be making big waves. And yet Luttwak’s point was that the
elites were neither noticing nor caring about the societal impact of these
waves crashing on the home country.
BLOG: VISIT MEXICO'S SECOND LARGEST CIT OF LOS ANGELES TO
WITNESS WHAT THE CRASHING WAVES TRULY LOOKS LIKE
Luttwak was especially cutting in
his dismissal of the Republican response: “In this situation, what does the
moderate Right … have to offer? Only more free trade and globalization,
more deregulation and structural change, thus more dislocation of lives and
social relations.”
Luttwak added that Republicans were
in the curious position of being economic libertarians and, at
the same time, social conservatives. That is, they were
more than a little schizophrenic, because wide-open economics typically
pulverizes any particular cultural heritage. As he put it, the
standard Republican “after-dinner speech is a two-part affair, in which
part one celebrates the virtues of unimpeded competition and dynamic structural
change, while part two mourns the decline of the family and community ‘values’
that were eroded precisely by the forces commended in part one.”
Okay, so Luttwak gets credit for
being ahead of his time—way ahead. He had grasped the reality that
economic growth and transformation is dislocating, especially when that
economic growth is differentialized within the society, as owners prosper and
workers suffer.
As Luttwak put it, the voguish
business-consultant jargon of the era—concepts such as “restructuring” and
“re-engineering”—was mostly just code words for downsizing and
outsourcing. That is, a given company might “grow” by slicing domestic
employment and moving production overseas, but it was growing only its own
profits, not its contribution to American society.
Yes, Luttwak’s was a lonely voice in
1994. And yet he knew that he was on to something; in 1998 he published
the equally prescient Turbo-Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy. Describing the
contemporary system, he noted, “It enriches industrializing poor countries,
impoverishes the semi-affluent majority in rich countries, and greatly adds to
the incomes of the top 1 percent on both sides who are managing the arbitrage.”
As we all know, it took a couple of
decades for people to see that Luttwak’s critique was dead-on. Back in the
’90s and ’00s, the elite consensus held that if planetary
arbitrageurs—operating in financial and informational hubs such as New York
City and San Francisco—were prospering, that was a good enough sign that
everyone was prospering. In this reckoning, what’s good for Goldman Sachs
and Google is good for America. And of course, if more immigrants—legal or otherwise—were needed
to serve in the service economy, well, that was good, too.
BLOG:
THE ENTIRE REASON FOR OPEN BORDERS IS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED AND PASS ALONG
THE TRUE COST OF ALL THAT "CHEAP" LABOR TO MIDDLE AMERICA. THERE IS
NO BILLIONAIRE WHO IS NOT AN ADVOCATE FOR AMNESTY, NON-ENFORCEMENT AND WIDER
OPEN BORDERS.
We can add that this smug view was
bipartisan: President George W. Bush shared Bill Clinton’s economic opinions;
indeed, if anything, Bush was even more of an enthusiast for closer integration
with Mexico. (Although, of course, Bush ended devoting most of his
presidency to the folly of closer integration with Iraq and
Afghanistan.) And as for Barack Obama, he was another globalist—seeking
closer integration with many countries, including China.
Thus it took until the 2016 election
for a presidential candidate to say, “Enough!” That candidate, of course,
was Donald Trump. (And in an odd way, some of Trump’s anti-globalization
arguments were echoed by another prominent ’16 candidate, Sen. Bernie Sanders.)
President Donald Trump
speaks to auto workers at the American Center for Mobility March 15, 2017, in
Ypsilanti, Michigan. Trump discussed his priorities of improving conditions to
bolster the manufacturing industry and reduce the outsourcing of American jobs.
(Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
In the memorable words of Stephen
K. Bannon, head honcho at the Trump presidential
campaign and then for a time the top strategist in the Trump White House, “The
globalists gutted the American working class and created a middle class in
Asia.”
By now, most national politicians,
in both parties, pay at least lip service to the Luttwak-Bannon argument;
there’s a realization that the American middle class paid the price while the
bi-coastal elite reaped the reward. And that’s why the various
trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific trade deals favored by the Obama
administration, and Hillary Clinton, seem to be dead.
And as an aside on the 2020
presidential campaign, post-Clinton Democrats, having finally soured on
Bill-and-Hill-style neoliberalism, are now targeting White House hopeful Pete
Buttigieg for his association with McKinsey
& Co. That’s the notorious and scandal-plagued “management consulting” firm that’s been at the forefront
of so many corporate decisions to lay off and to outsource, among other forms
of international skullduggery. Buttigieg is easily recognized as the candidate most likely to
revive those globalist trade deals, in keeping with his overall Harvard
mentality; no wonder he’s so popular with the Sonoma crystal wine-cave fundraisers.
Okay, so Luttwak stands as a
prophet. However, let’s hope that he isn’t proven to be right about everything that
he wrote back in 1994. After all, the headline atop Luttwak’s piece, a
quarter-century ago was scary. It bannered, “Why Fascism is the Wave of
the Future.” That’s right, the “F” word, Fascism.
Luttwak was careful to point out
that Fascism started out separate and distinct from Nazism. That
is, the Fascist movement of Benito Mussolini, who took power in Italy in 1922,
may have been un-democratic and illiberal, but it was not Hitlerian in its
war-mongering, antisemitic, and genocidal evil. In fact, within the early
Italian Fascist movement, Jews were well represented. But then, of
course, Mussolini took on a catastrophic turn in the 1930s, after Hitler came
to power in Germany, and Italy signed on to Hitler’s Axis.
September 1937: Italian
fascist dictator Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany,
in Munich. (Fox Photos/Getty Images)
Mussolini was later fully and
criminally complicit in Hitler’s wickedness, and yet still, Luttwak is right to
draw a distinction between early Fascism and Nazism.
And so it’s with the early-Mussolini
model in mind that Luttwak argued, back in ’94, that severe economic
dislocation would open the door to unpleasant political reaction:
… and that is the space that remains
wide open for a product-improved Fascist party, dedicated to the enhancement of
the personal economic security of the broad masses of (mainly) white-collar
working people. Such a party could even be as free of racism as
Mussolini’s original was until the alliance with Hitler, because its real stock
in trade would be corporativist restraints on corporate Darwinism, and delaying
if not blocking barriers against globalization.
Luttwak himself is no Fascist, and
yet as a learned historian and acute observer, he could see, a quarter-century
ago, that global trends were pushing Americans toward the point where an
anti-liberal backlash would come in full force.
Interestingly, in that 1994 article,
the American figure that Luttwak pointed to, as an early indicator, was Ross
Perot, the businessman-turned-populist. Perot was no Fascist, but his
success as a political outsider was, indeed, a stark repudiation of the liberal
and bipartisan status quo. Just two years earlier, Perot had, of course,
run for president as an independent, winning an impressive 19 percent of the
national vote. And what was one of Perot’s signature issues? Why, it
was his opposition to NAFTA. That trade deal, he said, would create a
“giant sucking sound,” as American jobs went south of the border.
U.S. independent
presidential candidate Ross Perot delivers his concession speech to the crowd
gathered November 3, 1992, at his election night headquarters. (PAUL
RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images)
Perot was mocked at the time, and
yet, of course, he has been proven right, and Clinton—plus fellow NAFTA
cheerleaders Bush 41 and Bush 43—have been proven wrong. Just as Luttwak
said it would, NAFTA turbo-charged North America, enriching the fat cats of
Wall Street and Silicon Valley, while sending regular jobs from Ohio to
Mexico.
BLOG: MOST OF WALL STREET AND ALL BILLIONAIRES ARE GENEROUS
DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA "The Race" NOW CALLING
ITSELF UNIDOSus - UNDER OBAMA, LA RAZA WAS FUNDED WITH TAX DOLLARS AND
OPERATED OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE.
But
okay, just one last thing: What about that “F” word, “Fascism”? If Luttwak
was correct in his economic and social predictions, might he be correct, too,
in his political prediction, about the coming of a “product-improved Fascist
party”?
Today,
many on the left have their answer: Donald Trump is a Fascist. A
Google search of “Donald Trump” and “Fascist” elicits millions of hits,
including an October 2016 Washington Post op-ed entitled,
“How fascist is Donald Trump?” And just on December 21, Rep. Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez, speaking to an audience in California, declared, “It is
fascism, what we’re evolving into.”
Of
course, the left was playing the “Fascist” smear game long before
Trump. Both Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan were routinely labeled as
Fascists, as was George W.
Bush. And in 2004, the leading liberal group Moveon.org went
there, equating Bush
to, yes, Hitler.
Indeed,
as the liberal Atlantic magazine acknowledged in
2016, it’s been a standard tactic of the left to smear just about every Republican
as a “Fascist.” So as we can see, the left’s demagoguery has cheapened the
word “Fascist” to the point of irrelevance; today, the “F” word is simply just
one more insult in the left-wing arsenal.
So
no, Trump is not a Fascist, and neither are Republicans. In fact, come to
think of it, if we wanted to envision Fascism in the 21st century—allowing for
changes in style and fashion—we might think of Antifa, which is the
hipster name for Anti-Fascist.
As
Breitbart News has pointed out, Antifa
ideologists believe that violent thuggery on the streets is a key part of their
strategy for provoking civil strife—and that, of course, is classic
Fascism. So in other words, when we see the word “Antifa,” we should just
delete the “Anti” and know that we’re seeing “Fa.”
An unidentified Rose City
Antifa member flicks off to the police during a demonstration between the left
and right at Pioneer Courthouse Square on June 29, 2019 in Portland, Oregon.
(Moriah Ratner/Getty Images)
Andy Ngo, a
Portland-based journalist, is seen covered in unknown substance after
unidentified Rose City Antifa members attacked him on June 29, 2019 in
Portland, Oregon. (Moriah Ratner/Getty Images)
An Antifa demonstrator
has a heated exchange with a pro-Trump supporter during the Denver March
Against Sharia Law in Denver, Colorado on June 10, 2017. (JASON CONNOLLY/AFP
via Getty Images)
Of
course, there’s more going wrong with American society than just Antifa
hooliganism. The sort of churn that Luttwak lamented a quarter-century ago
has been profoundly damaging to the social fabric, and we see it in the
worsening of societal indicators, including flattened wages, family breakdown,
opioid use, and gun violence, including mass shootings.
And yes, it’s possible that if the deterioration continues, some
sort of strong antidote—more precisely, a horrible “antidote”—could
emerge.
So
if we want to make sure we can fend off even the threat of Fascism, we should
start with leadership that’s both strong and wise. Strong leaders stand up
to extremist Antifa-type violence, of course, and yet, at the same time, they
are wise enough to solve the underlying social conditions that contribute to
extremism.
After
all, Italian Fascism emerged from the wreckage of World War One. And we
can add that Communism—another terrible extremism that’s a kind of mirror to
Fascism—emerged in Russia at around the same time, in the wake of the same
war. And a decade later, Nazism emerged from the war, too, as well as from
the Depression.
So
obviously we start our anti-Fascism plan with a commitment to overall peace and
prosperity. That is, no stupid foreign wars, no crazy economic policies. And
then we have to get to work on the healing of our homeland, repairing the many
social and cultural injuries and injustices caused by turbo-capitalism.
GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION
FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS
The judge found these
releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall
Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of
the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look
behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United
States during a presidential election.”
SUCKING IN THE
BANKSTERS’ BRIBES: DID THEY SERVE THEIR BANKSTERS WELL?
“Clinton also failed to mention how he
and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires,
in part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street
bankers.”
GEORGE SOROS AND
THE CLINTON GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BANKSTERS AND WIDE OPEN BORDERS
NEW YORK — Demand Justice, an
organization founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential
campaign and associated with a “social welfare organization” financed by
billionaire activist George S oros, is raising money for an eventual court
fight against what the group describes as President Trump’s proposed “racist,
unnecessary wall.”
“Obama would declare himself president for life with Soros
really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”
“Hillary was always small potatoes, a placeholder as it were. Her health
was always suspect. And do you think the plotters would have let a doofus like
Tim Kaine take office in the event that Hillary became disabled?”
THE GRIFTERS: HILLARY, BILLARY and CHELSEA… global
looters!
"But
there is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons, thoroughly practiced
grifters
that they are, as well as their increasingly shady daughter, will not
hesitate
to use such classified information as they may be able to access for
personal
and political enrichment. They've been doing it for decades,
and
they're
not about to stop now." RUSS VAUGHN
CLINTON MAFIA AND THEIR BANKSTERS AT GOLDMAN SACHS
WHO IS TIGHTER WITH THE PLUNDERING BANKSTERS? CLINTON,
OBAMA or TRUMP?
The Clinton White House
famously abolished the Glass–Steagall legislation, which separated commercial
and investment banking. The move was a boon for Wall
Street firms and led to major bank mergers that some analysts say helped
contribute to the 2008 financial crisis.
Bill and Hillary Clinton
raked in massive speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, with CNN documenting a total
of at least $7.7 million in paid speeches to big financial firms, including
Goldman Sachs and UBS. Hillary Clinton made $675,000 from speeches to Goldman
Sachs specifically, and her husband secured more
than $1,550,000 from Goldman speeches. In 2005 alone, Bill Clinton collected over
$500,000 from three Goldman Sachs events.
Hillary Clinton is simply the epitome
of the rabid self – a whirlpool of selfishness, greed, and malignance.
It may well be true that Donald Trump has made his greatest
contribution to the nation before even taking office: the political destruction of Hillary Clinton and her
infinitely corrupt machine. J.R. Dunn
"Hillary will do
anything to distract you from her reckless record and the damage to the
Democratic Party and the America she and The Obama's have created."
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic
party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not
a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL
BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone
virtually unreported by Corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the
Clintons’
longstanding support for
“open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed
in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open
borders frequently comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy
foreign audiences and donors.
The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes bribery,
embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of justice.
Secretary Hillary Clinton and the Deep State: A RICO Criminal
Conspiracy
We who elected President Trump
understood our elected officials and the Deep State were sandbagging Trump and self-dealing public funds.
It was no secret that President Trump is no angel, unpresidential, blunt, and
crude, and a disruptor. Trump was hired to drain the swamp.
I watched this kabuki theater unfold over the last several
years. Through my eyes as a shopworn gumshoe, I will explain what is happening.
My investigative curiosity was first piqued by the ATF Fast and Furious scandal
and continues through the recent House impeachment show trial. There is a
common element running through all of these cons — the
actions of an organized crime conspiracy. A group of people either
acting alone or in concert with others committed crimes with a common purpose -
a criminal enterprise as described in "CRIMINAL RICO: 18 USC. §§1961-1968 A
Manual For Federal Prosecutors."
The players acted together – in the
usurpation of power, the abuse of power by public officials, bribery, thefts by
fraud including federal funds, money laundering, perjury and the obstruction of
justice, the violations of fundamental of civil rights, aided and abetted in
the commission of these crimes and or to conceal these crimes. Criminals will
lie and can't keep their lies straight. Their methods and behaviors are the
same, whether engaging in street crimes or elaborate white-collar financial
schemes. The only difference is when more money is involved, the perps are more
adept in concealing, covering up their sins, and hiding where the money went.
Many of these scandals are well known to the American Thinker readers.
I will focus my comments on Hillary's home brew sever and the Clinton
Foundation as an example of how RICO can be used to prosecute the players.
FBI Director James Comey indicted
Hillary Clinton for her home brew server at his press conference. Comey then
egregiously concluded that there was no evidence of criminal intent purportedly
“required” to prosecute. Comey bastardized the Federal Espionage Act in absolving Hillary Clinton.
FBI's investigation of Clinton's emails was low-balled. There was never a real
search for the truth. The outcome was preordained. My jaw dropped wide open. I
knew the fix was in. FBI Director Comey lied to the people with a straight
face. Why?
The chance meeting of Bill Clinton
and AG Loretta Lynch on the airport tarmac was no mere coincidence. This chat
was not about the grandkids. Bill Clinton was there to convey a specific
message to Lynch that there would be no indictment of Hillary. Hillary
Clinton's email case must tank. This would have constituted bribery, if AG Lynch was
assured she would continue as AG in Clinton Administration. This meeting
took place only weeks before Comey's press conference dumping Hillary Clinton's
email case.
The Deep State needed Hillary Clinton
to win the 2016 presidential election, or the dike holding back the truth would
burst. Trump, the disruptor, was an immediate threat to both the Republicans,
Democrats, and the Deep State. If the truth
were laid bare, it would expose the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, the
Senate and House, and many executive departments for these abuses of power,
corruption, bribery, frauds, and thefts of public funds.
High-level government officials and
the Deep State committed many serious felonies either in furtherance of or to
conceal the crimes committed in the pay to play scam. In
exchange for favorable consideration by Secretary Clinton, those who benefited
would donate to the Clinton Foundation. The FBI started and
stopped investigations into the Clinton Foundation at least twice as reported
by the Washington Post. Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton Cash, is the most damning. Dinesh D'Souza slammed the Foundation
in the National Review, as did The Federalist.
The status of the investigation of the Foundation by US
Attorney John Huber's is unknown. Rudy Giuliani said there was enough to
pursue "Clinton Inc" as
racketeering under RICO. The Foundation and its affiliated nonprofits require a real
investigation with an in-depth forensic audit to determine where the money
went. In financial crimes investigation, the prime rule is "follow the
money, honey." Illicit nonprofits have many ways to divert funds by
inflating salaries, expenses, and money laundering.
Illegal nonprofit schemes are
difficult to prosecute without hard evidence and the testimony of insiders. The
motive of Hillary Clinton's use of the home brew server was to conceal emails
from FOIA requests that would provide the hard evidence. Hillary Clinton destroyed
the data on her server and cell phones with the knowledge of the FBI. It took
years for Judicial Watch and others to pry and recover
some of these damning emails from the foot-dragging executive departments that
were complicit and knew what was going on.
RICO initially was used to target mob
families. RICO is also a useful tool to fight white collar conspiracies. They
both have the same hierarchy of low-level crooks led by the top players, linked
together with a common purpose. RICO has tools to squeeze the low-level
operatives to gather evidence to prosecute, jail, and seize assets of the
conspirators. The critical element required is a pattern of criminal
or racketeering activity. This pattern is proved by showing two predicate
crimes were committed within ten years. The list of predicate crimes is extensive and includes
bribery, embezzlement, fraud, theft, money laundering, and obstruction of
justice. The typical five-year statute of limitations for most federal
felonies is extended to ten years from the last criminal act or acts committed
to conceal the conspiracy, i.e., lying under oath and similar actions to
obstruct justice. The prison sentences are steep. The effect is to cut off the
head of the organization and not just the low-level players.
The criminal activity extends back to
the ATF's Fast and Furious program through the House impeachment show trial to
cover up the illegal acts of the Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, the
Department of State, the DOJ, the FBI, and the CIA. A telltale sign that
the DOJ under US Attorney General Barr is willing to play hardball and may use
RICO, came when he spoke to the Federalist Society: "Barr accuses liberal 'resistance' of
trying to 'sabotage' Trump." AG Barr said this, "shows FBI launched Trump campaign
investigation on the 'thinnest of suspicions." AG Barr is the new sheriff in town, he wears a
badge, has guns and will travel, can impanel grand juries, indict and arrest
people, and is not limited in his jurisdiction, like DOJ IG Horowitz.
The collective actions of the Deep
State are and were a silent coup to delegitimize a Presidential candidate. Once
elected to impede and resist the duly elected President. The President's law
enforcement and intel agencies were corrupted at the highest level and went
rogue.
Organized crime can't exist without
corrupt law enforcement. As I wrote in a letter to President Trump earlier this
year:
.
. . I believe you understand the gravity of the situation and of its importance
to the very survival of our Country as we know it. If the people involved are
not held accountable for their actions, we will be no different than some Third
World Banana Republic.
Failure
to act will destroy our founding principle of the Rule of Law as stated by
President John Adams, "We Are a Nation of Laws, Not of Men" and we
cannot allow a two-tiered justice system to prevail.
Ron Wright is a retired detective from Riverside PD, CA. BA in
political science CSUF, M. Adm. University of Cal, Riverside. Facebook at Ron
T. Cop.
Soros-Linked
Group Gets Six GOP Governors to Resettle More Refugees
A pro-mass immigration organization
with links to billionaire George Soros has successfully lobbied six Republican
governors to resettle more refugees in their states.
For Fiscal Year 2020, President
Donald Trump will continue cutting refugee
admissions by reducing former President Barack Obama’s refugee inflow by at
least 80 percent. This reduction would mean a maximum of 18,000 refugees can be
resettled in the U.S. between October 1, 2019, and September 30,
2020. This is merely a numerical limit and not a goal federal officials are
supposed to reach.
Coupled with the refugee reduction,
Trump signed an executive
order that gives localities, counties, and states veto power over whether
they want to resettle refugees in their communities.
Executives at World Relief and the
Evangelical Immigration Table — an organization with links to the Soros-funded
National Immigration Forum — have been lobbying governors across the country to
bring more refugees to their states. So far, six Republican governors have
signed off to resettle refugees in their states, including North Dakota Gov. Doug
Burgum and Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey.
Jenny Yang, vice president for
advocacy at World Relief, an evangelical agency whose work includes
resettlement, has been steering an effort to lobby governors to keep
their states open to refugees. [Emphasis added]
She said about 16 governors
have submitted written consent, six of them Republicans. Gov. Doug Ducey,
Republican of Arizona, agreed after receiving a letter supporting resettlement
signed by 250 evangelical leaders. Gov. Greg Abbott, Republican of Texas,
who leads the state that received the most refugees last year, has not yet
offered his view, despite a plea from the mayor of Fort Worth to continue
accepting refugees. [Emphasis added]
Refugee contractors, like
the Lutheran Social Services organization, have deployed a campaign to get
mayors, local officials, and governors to admit more refugees to their states.
Those contractors’ budgets every year are reliant on ensuring that as many
refugees are resettled across the U.S. as possible.
It remains unclear which six
Republican governors, aside from Burgum and Ducey, have been successfully
lobbied by the Soros-linked group.
This week, the Evangelical
Immigration Table sent letters to the governors of California, Florida,
Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin to ask them to bring
refugees to their states.
The federally mandated refugee
resettlement program has brought more than 718,000 refugees to the U.S. since
January 2008 — a group larger than the entire state population of Wyoming,
which has 577,000 residents. In the last decade, about 73,000 refugees have
been resettled in California, 71,500 resettled in Texas, nearly 43,000
resettled in New York, and more than 36,000 resettled in Michigan.
Refugee resettlement costs American
taxpayers nearly $9 billion every five
years, according to the latest research. Over the course of five years, an
estimated 16 percent of all refugees admitted will need housing assistance paid
for by taxpayers.
AXIS OF EVIL, GREED AND
CORRUPTION: THE SOROS – OBAMA – CLINTON CONSPIRACY
“The
Lawlessness of the Obama Administration: A never-ending story.” Michael
Barone – American Historian – Washington
Examiner
His ambition is without borders -- “The Soviet Empire is
now the Soros Empire.” “I’m the Pope’s boss now.” And so on, ad nauseum. Yet, like other
tyrants, he is untouchable. Those he has made richer and more powerful protect
him.
‘Deplorable’
Americans however confounded Soros by not voting for “What can we do for you,
George?” Hillary Clinton.
GEORGE SOROS AND
THE CLINTON GLOBALIST AGENDA FOR BANKSTERS AND OPEN BORDERS
NEW YORK — Demand Justice, an organization
founded by former members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and
associated with a “social welfare organization” financed by billionaire
activist George Soros, is raising money for an eventual court fight against
what the group describes as President Trump’s proposed “racist, unnecessary
wall.”
THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush
fund
“There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with
foundation funds,” states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business with that of the foundation. Many people within the foundation have
tried to caution him about this but he does not listen, and there really is no
talking to him,” the memo added.
GLOBALIST BARACK OBAMA AND NANCY PELOSI’S CONSPIRACY TO
SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY AND KEEP AMERICA FLOODED WITH DEM VOTING ILLEGALS
"Along with Obama, Pelosi and
Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the
eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY
One of the most disgusting things to come out of the
Obama administration was "Operation Fast and Furious," where members
of the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) allowed
illegal gun sales to go through – commonly referred to as "gun
walking" – in order to track buyers and sellers they believed were
connected to the Mexican drug cartels. Nearly 2,000 firearms were sold and were
eventually found throughout the United States and Mexico. Two of them were used
to k ill Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. BETH BAUMANN
THE CONSPIRACY TO SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY
The Democrat Party’s
secret agenda for wider open borders, more welfare for invading illegals, more
jobs and free anything they illegally vote for…. All to destroy the two-party
system and build the GLOBALISTS’ DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP
WAGES DEPRESSED.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/frontpage-hidden-agenda-of-pueblo-sin.html
Demonstrably and
irrefutably the Democrat Party became the party whose principle objective is to
thoroughly transform the nature of the American electorate by means of open
borders and the mass, unchecked importation of illiterate third world peasants
who will vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats and their La Raza welfare
state. FRONTPAGE MAG
CLOSET MUSLIM BARACK OBAMA’S CONSPIRACY FOR A THIRD TERM FOR LIFE
First, destroy Trump and put Hillary away if she doesn’t end up in
jail.
HE PARTNERS WITH ZUCKERBERG, SOROS AND LOUIS FARRAKHAN
“Obama would declare himself president for life with Soros
really running the show, as he did for the entire Obama presidency.”
“Hillary was always
small potatoes, a placeholder as it were. Her health was always suspect. And do
you think the plotters would have let a doofus like Tim Kaine take office in
the event that Hillary became disabled?”
“Obama has the
totalitarian impulse. After all, he went around saying he didn't have
Constitutional authority to legalize the illegals, and then he tried anyway.
The courts stopped him.”
“The bottom line 2 is
this: Barack Obama is a Communist. This was all an Obama operation. Why is
anyone surprised that a communist (Obama) tried to subvert an election. That is
what Communists do. It is Barack Obama and his people like Brennan and Clapper
behaving to type. That's what Maduro does in Venezuela. That's what the Castro
brothers did. That's what every communist and socialist nation does. THEY FIX ELECTIONS!!”
“Hillary
kept a secret server overflowing with national security info which, more than
likely, was hacked. June 28, 2016, on a Phoenix tarmac, Bill Clinton met with
Attorney General Loretta Lynch to seal a deal insuring Hillary would not be
prosecuted.”
“Obama, of course, covered
up his own role, depicting his presidency as eight years of heroic
efforts to repair the damage caused by the 2008 financial crash. At
the end of those eight years, however, Wall Street and the financial
oligarchy were fully recovered, enjoying record wealth, while
working people were poorer than before, a widening social chasm that
made possible the election of the billionaire con man and Demagogue in November
2016.”
David Bernstein & The Heritage Foundation - “Lawless: The
Obama Administration’s Unprecedented Assault on the Constitution and the Rule
of Law.”
“The
Lawlessness of the Obama Administration: A never-ending story.” Michael
Barone – American Historian – Washington
Examiner
George Soros: A New Kind
of Tyrant?
The
venomous careers of Hitler and Stalin provoked the study of totalitarian
regimes as the very epitome of evil, depriving their citizens of freedom and of
life itself. A state captured by a demagogue is considered a sure sign of
danger ahead -- hence the alleged justification by the Left for their hysteria
over “rabble rouser” Donald Trump’s election. Overlooked until more recently
are the unelected, bloated bureaucratic fiefdoms and regulatory encroachments
of both national and global government and non-governmental institutions, which
have created the opportunity for a sinister, large scale violation of political
power.
This
new abuse was foreshadowed in the career of FBI architect and director, the
corrupt J. Edgar Hoover. It has been notched up to a planetary level of
hyper-coordination by George Soros as preliminary to the installation of his
global Open Society. In this grandiose plan, state governments (specifically
the USA) will be reduced to the level of relay stations for a supranational, Sauron-like
centralization of power.
What
unites the totalitarian and the new tyrant are three personality
characteristics, proposed by Professor John D. Mayer in his 1993 article, “The Emotional Madness of the Dangerous Leader.” The first is
indifference. The tyrant is consumed by a single-minded, fanatical purpose and
has no regard for the suffering wreaked on others during its implementation.
The second is intolerance of those whose opinions differ, facilitated through
control of the media, secret and insider knowledge, revenge against anyone who
thwarts, and a paranoid mania to shut down all opposition. The third character
trait (the foundation of the previous two), is psychopathic grandiosity. The
power-abuser assumes a messianic pose of unifying society under a utopian plan
and persuading others to participate. The very intensity of the tyrant’s
narcissism is transferred to vulnerable supporters eliciting a narcotic rush of
enthusiasm.
What
is easily overlooked is that the sham scheme is not a political health remedy,
but a device for maintaining the megalomaniac’s sense of personal omnipotence.
In Soros’ own words, “Next to my fantasies about being God, I also have very
strong fantasies of being mad. In fact, my grandfather was actually paranoid.”
Soros seems disarming in his frankness. But delusions of grandeur preclude
self-knowledge, as Soros’ next statements reveal. “I have a lot of
madness in my family. So far I have escaped it.”
Soros
has spilled bucketloads of words proclaiming he is
“amoral,” “self-interested,” and that “normal rules do not apply” to him. “I am
unnatural. I am a sort of deux ex machina. I’m very comfortable with my public
persona, because it is the one I have created myself.” And this from the man
who controls politicians and bureaucrats like a boss giving dictation to his
secretary. This is the man who has perfected the subversion of governments, who
has robbed failing states, and lavishly endowed every organization and movement
destructive of traditional Western society, from abolishing the Electoral
College to abolishing life itself if it is in utero, drug-addicted, or senile. His ambition is without borders -- “The Soviet Empire is
now the Soros Empire.” “I’m the Pope’s boss now.” And so on, ad nauseum. Yet, like other
tyrants, he is untouchable. Those he has made richer and more powerful protect
him.
In
March 1933 the Germans voted. They could have voted for the moderate Center
Christian party. Instead they voted in Hitler. ‘Deplorable’ Americans
however confounded Soros by not voting for “What can we do for you, George?”
Hillary Clinton. Yet where are the congressional and Senate investigations
into Soros? Where is the RICO indictment? Governments have been bought. The
media has been bought. The Soros NGO empire operates an invasive, parasitic web
currently devouring the body politic of the USA and many other nations besides.
What
Trump’s election has revealed is the limitation of the Presidency in
withstanding the transfer of power to unelected, publicly unaccountable
bureaucrats, and venal politicians, more concerned with their benefices than
their constituents. That void has allowed Soros to install himself as de facto puppet-master. We require bureaucracy,
and we cannot prevent the existence of associations, but there is an
urgent need for reform by abolishing permanency in government and establishing
citizens’ tribunals of appeal against abuses of administrative power.
Recently
in an interview on his simpering NPR, Soros confessed he was unprepared for the populist
opposition to
his insurrectionary agenda. Let us continue our opposition. Let us demand Soros
be investigated and brought to justice as conditional for obtaining our
vote. Those with connection to him must be banned from public office, and his
assets frozen. Then his parasitical minions will shrivel, like leeches desiccated
by a pinch of salt. If not, although we may escape the mass slaughter of the
twentieth century, it will be at the cost of vassalage beneath a tyrant like
George Soros.
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Book deals. The way to get rich upon leaving public office, just as
congressional insiders make themselves rich in public office by trading on
insider information, as described by Peter Schweizer in "Throw Them All Out."
#1 New York Times Bestseller!
Peter Schweizer
has been fighting corruption―and winning―for years. In Throw Them All Out, he
exposed insider trading by members of Congress, leading to the passage of the
STOCK Act. In Extortion,
he uncovered how politicians use mafia-like tactics to enrich themselves. And
in Clinton Cash,
he revealed the Clintons’ massive money machine and sparked an FBI
investigation.
Now he explains
how a new corruption has taken hold, involving larger sums of money than ever
before. Stuffing tens of thousands of dollars into a freezer has morphed into
multibillion-dollar equity deals done in the dark corners of the world.
An American bank
opening in China would be prohibited by US law from hiring a slew of family
members of top Chinese politicians. However, a Chinese bank opening in America
can hire anyone it wants. It can even invite the friends and families of
American politicians to invest in can’t-lose deals.
President Donald
Trump’s children have made front pages across the world for their dicey
transactions. However, the media has barely looked into questionable deals made
by those close to Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Mitch McConnell, and
lesser-known politicians who have been in the game longer.
In many parts of
the world, the children of powerful political figures go into business and
profit handsomely, not necessarily because they are good at it, but because
people want to curry favor with their influential parents. This is a relatively
new phenomenon in the United States. But for relatives of some prominent
political families, we may already be talking about hundreds of millions of
dollars.
Deeply researched and packed with shocking revelations, Secret Empires identifies
public servants who cannot be trusted and provides a path toward a more
accountable government.
Schweizer:
Biden Needs to Address Ukraine Accusations ‘Front and Center’
11 Oct 201910
1:18
Breitbart News senior contributor
Peter Schweizer, author of “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class
Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” on Friday stressed the importance of 2020 Democratic
presidential candidate Joe Biden addressing the Ukraine issue involving him and
his son, Hunter.
Flashback–Biden:
U.S. Needs More H-1B Foreign Workers for Corporations
JOHN BINDER
17 Jun 2019162
3:44
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden advocated for bringing more H-1B
foreign visa workers to the United States to compete against American graduates
and professionals in high-paying science, technology, and engineering jobs.
Biden told
attendees of the Export-Import Bank’s 2013 Annual Conference that not only
did the U.S. need to bring more H-1B foreign visa workers to the country for
corporations, but that foreign students graduating from American universities
should “literally” be given green cards to permanently stay in the U.S.
Biden said:
We also think
its essential to reform the immigration system. Every year … our
university system generates roughly 40,000 people with PhDs and master degrees
in areas of science and technology that we need and we make sure that they’re
promptly escorted back to their country. At the very same time, we’re
spending hundreds of millions of dollars on STEM education. It makes no
sense in my humble opinion. [Emphasis added]
Sending
them back to their country denies them a visa even when they have a job waiting for
them. Instead of sending them home, we should be a stamping a green
card on their diploma as they walk across the stage. Literally, I mean this
literally, not figuratively, literally. If they have a job here, they
should be able to stay here. We should want them here. [Emphasis added]
Ladies and
gentlemen, we’ve also proposed adding additional H-1B visas so that
American employers can hire the best and the brightest no matter where they
come from if they can’t be found here. [Emphasis added]
Every
year, more than 100,000 foreign workers are brought to the U.S. on the H-1B
visa and are allowed to stay for up to six years. There are about 650,000
H-1B visa foreign workers in
the U.S. at any given moment. Americans are often laid off in the
process and forced to train their foreign replacements, as highlighted by
Breitbart News. Nearly 70
percent of all H-1B visas are rewarded to Indian nationals.
More
than 85,000 Americans annually potentially lose their jobs to foreign labor
through the H-1B visa program. Oftentimes, importing a foreign worker on
the H-1B visa is the first step in a multinational corporations’ effort to
outsource the American job, as the foreign worker arrives in the U.S., is
trained in the job, and then is eventually sent back overseas with the job.
While
Biden advocated for more labor market competition against America’s
professionals and graduates, foreign workers have already crowded out Americans
in the tech hub of Silicon Valley, California.
“We have no voice in Washington,” said one American
mother and STEM worker who was replaced by an H-1B. “There are 500 lobbyists
for Big Tech, for cheap labor via the H-1B, L-1, OPT, and H4 EAD programs. Who
wants to hear from us?”https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/05/americans-replaced-by-foreign-h-1bs-theres-no-shortage-of-u-s-workers/ … via @JxhnBinder
Americans Replaced
by H-1B Visas: 'There's No Shortage' of U.S. Workers
Analysis
conducted last year reveal that 71
percent of tech workers in Silicon Valley are
foreign-born, while the tech industry in the San Francisco, Oakland, and
Hayward area is made up of 50 percent foreign-born tech workers.
Last
year, U.S. businesses and corporations attempted to outsource nearly
420,000 American jobs to foreigners through the H-1B visa program — a number
that outpaces the population of Tampa, Florida.
As
Breitbart News previously reported, more than
2.7 million H-1B foreign workers have been approved to come to the U.S. to take
American jobs between 2007 and 2017. During that same period, businesses tried
to outsource almost 3.5 million American jobs to foreign workers instead of
hiring Americans.
About
four million young Americans enter the workforce each year, many looking for
white-collar jobs in the STEM fields. Those Americans’ prospects of finding
work are crippled by the country’s legal immigration process, which admits
more than 1.5 million immigrants and hundreds of thousands of foreign visa
workers annually.
"While America’s working and middle class
have been subjected to compete for jobs against a constant flow of
cheaper foreign workers — where
more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled immigrants are admitted to the country annually — the billionaire class has experienced historic salary
gains." Sen. Josh Hawley
more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled immigrants are admitted to the country annually — the billionaire class has experienced historic salary
gains." Sen. Josh Hawley
"This is how they will destroy
America from within. The leftist billionaires who
orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing
us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion of
millions of migrants. They have nothing but contempt
for those of us who must endure the consequences of
our communities being intruded upon by gang members,
drug dealers and human
traffickers. These people have no intention
of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have
contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY
“Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible
government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the
people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance
between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the
statesmanship of today.” THEODORE ROOSEVELT
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do
it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly
entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends.
They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power
and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by
now." ---- Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes."
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes."
Watch–Josh Hawley Rips ‘Aristocratic Elite’ for Engineering U.S. Economy Against American Middle Class
JOHN BINDER
16 May 2019184
6:00
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) ripped what he called the country’s “new
aristocratic elite” for engineering the United States economy against the
American middle class.
For
his first major speech on the Senate floor, Hawley slammed the “big banks, big
tech, big multi-national corporations, along with their allies in the academy
and the media,” whom he said have created an economic structure in which they,
the well-connected, benefit while the American working and middle class
increasingly struggle to get ahead.
Hawley
said:
The chattering class often tells us that all of this—the jobs,
the despair, the loss of standing—is the result of forces beyond anyone’s
control. As if that’s an excuse to do nothing. But in fact,
it’s not true. [Emphasis added]
Today’s society benefits those who shaped it, and it has been
shaped not by working men and women, but by the new aristocratic elite. Big
banks, big tech, big multi-national corporations, along with their allies in
the academy and the media—these are the aristocrats of our age. They live
in the United States, but they consider themselves citizens of the
world. [Emphasis added]
They
operate businesses or run universities here, but their primary loyalty
is to their own agenda for a more unified, progressive—and profitable—global
order. These modern aristocrats often claim to be a meritocracy. And many
of them truly believe they are. What they don’t see, or won’t acknowledge, is
that the society they have built works mainly for themselves. They’ve
effectively run this country for decades. And their legacy is national division
and national decline. [Emphasis added]
Defending
the needs of the American middle class against a growingly powerful
“aristocratic elite” is the “crisis of our time,” Hawley asserted.
“After
years of sacrifice, the great American middle is being pushed aside by a new,
arrogant aristocracy,” Hawley said. “The new aristocrats seek to remake society
in their own image: to engineer an economy that works for the elite but few
else, to fashion a culture that is dominated by their own preferences.”
“This
town has embraced a politics of elite values and elite ambition rather than
building opportunities to thrive in the great and broad American middle. This
has left middle America—the great American middle class—under siege: battling
the loss of respect and work, the decline of home and family, an epidemic of
loneliness and despair,” Hawley continued. “This is the crisis of our time.”
Specifically,
Hawley blasted multinational corporations for outsourcing American middle class
jobs overseas — wreaking economic, cultural, and social havoc on rural and
small town American communities in the process — and both political establishments
for treating American citizens as mere consumers.
“In
places like the one where I grew up, in middle Missouri, good-paying jobs that
you can raise a family on are going away,” Hawley said. “The jobs go overseas
or south of the border or to cities on the coasts. And once-vibrant towns
decline, taking with them the network of schools and neighborhoods and churches
that make up middle class life.”
Hawley
continued:
Rural
America has been particularly hard hit. Rural Americans’ life
expectancy has not just leveled off, its actually dropped, and for women
without a high school degree, that drop has been staggering. In some rural
places, residents struggle with outright deprivation. [Emphasis added]
My home state contains some of the poorest counties in America,
all in rural places that once boasted thriving small towns. As those
communities struggle, want sets in. But the crisis reaches well beyond
economics. [Emphasis added]
The message that Washington has sent our whole society is loud
and clear: our elites are the people who matter—and those
who aspire to join them. Everyone else is unimportant or backwards.
And millions of Americans are left with the sense that the people who
run this country view them with nothing but contempt and value them as nothing
but consumers. [Emphasis added]
Indeed,
working and middle class Americans have been hit the hardest from decades-long
political consensus between the Republican establishment and Democrats.
Recent research revealed that while coastal, elite metropolis cities have flourished in the last decade, small town and rural American communities have suffered depopulation, mass job loss, and continued economic strain since the Great Recession.
For
instance, by 2016, elite zip codes had a surplus of 3.6 million jobs,
which is more than the combined bottom 80 percent of American zip codes. While
it only took about five years for wealthy cities to replace the jobs lost by
the recession, it took “at risk” regions of the country a decade to recover,
and “distressed” U.S. communities are “unlikely ever to recover on current
trendlines,” the report predicts.
Economic
growth among the country’s middle-class counties and middle-class zip codes has
considerably trailed national economic growth. For example, between 2012 and
2016, there were 4.4 percent more business establishments in the country as a
whole. That growth was less than two percent in the median zip code and there
was close to no growth in the median county.
While America’s working and middle class have been subjected to
compete for jobs against a constant flow of cheaper foreign workers — where
more than 1.2 million mostly low-skilled immigrants are admitted to the country
annually — the billionaire class has experienced historic salary gains.
A
study by the Economic Policy Institute found that the country’s
top 0.01 percent have enjoyed more than 15 times as much
wage growth as the bottom 90 percent of wage earners. Between 1979 and 2017,
working and middle class Americans’ wages grew by only 22 percent. On the other
hand, the plutocrat class saw their salaries grow by more than 155 percent over
the same period.
Likewise,
free trade deals like NAFTA — supported by Republicans and Democrats — as well
as China’s entering the World Trade Organization (WTO) has eliminated nearly
five million American manufacturing jobs across the country,
devastating steel towns and U.S. autoworkers. One former steel town in
West Virginia lost 94
percent of its steel jobs because of NAFTA, with nearly 10,000 workers in
the town being displaced from the steel industry.
JAMES WALSH
THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA… first ease millions of illegals over our
borders and into our voting booths!
How the
Democrat party surrendered America to Mexico:
“The
watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama
administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices
Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington
Times
"This
is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a
common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is
taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational
program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA
$800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General
Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by
roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the
mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to
make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two
pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.
“The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the
Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger
illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty,
the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals,
according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”
No comments:
Post a Comment