The Tenuous Future of the Democratic Party
We’ve now witnessed seven Democratic debates ahead of the Iowa Caucus this February. At this point, it’s clear that Biden, Sanders, and Warren have a legitimate shot at becoming the nominee, whereas the rest will likely go home after the first few primaries. These frontrunners are now the subject of a growing dilemma that’s undermining party unity and raising questions about its future vision.
Four years ago, the Republican Party had to grapple with the rise of Trump, who undermined Republican orthodoxy whenever it suited him. Democrats enjoyed watching Trump make a mockery of his fellow candidates and the entire primary process as he split the Party and severed the head of the Republican establishment. Little did they know that Trump, whom they didn’t consider a serious candidate, could galvanize enough popular support to actually become president and remake the Republican Party altogether.
Currently, Democrats are facing a similar dilemma. The leading candidates have very different visions for the Party and for the country. It remains unclear whether or not unity can exist between the (comparatively) moderate establishment faction of the Party, represented by Biden, and the radical anti-establishment faction, represented by Sanders and Warren.
Hillary’s shocking defeat in 2016 gave the populist movement on both sides of the aisle momentum to last a generation. Trump’s presidency will leave its mark on Republican politics just as Reagan’s presidency did 30 years ago with the revitalization of Goldwater conservatism and an America-first foreign policy. The same can be said for Democratic politics, as Sanders and Warren are claiming to fight for the American worker over the greed of the corporate elite.
However, unlike with Trump in 2016, there’s no clear frontrunner behind whom voters can rally. Biden has proven to be too mistake-prone to gain a significant polling edge; Sanders hasn’t proven from his 2016 bid that he can rally enough support among African Americans and Evangelicals in the Deep South; and it’s unclear how Warren’s personality and charisma will be received by the electorate.
Another, more immediate problem looms over Democratic candidates as they try to oust Trump in November: Trump’s impeachment trial. From watching the primary debates, it’s clear that impeachment is the elephant in the room that the candidates want to avoid. The reason for this is simple: each candidate feels that he/she has something unique to offer and wants his/her ideas and platforms to shine through the shadow of a messy, highly politicized impeachment trial that isn’t popular with independents.
Jumping on the impeachment bandwagon not only makes the candidates look opportunistic and, ironically, undemocratic but also fuels the narrative that Democrats are running primarily on an anti-Trump platform, which, as evidenced by Hillary’s campaign, is an optic that isn’t likely to get out the vote. As such, handing out 30 engraved souvenir pens with Pelosi’s name on them at a joyous impeachment ceremony served only to strengthen the narrative that Trump’s impeachment is merely a Democratic ploy to overturn the results of the 2016 election.
So far, the winning party in this fight is President Trump, who can sit back and watch a bumbling impeachment trial unfold while Democratic candidates vie for supremacy on the debate stage. Moreover, Trump can rejoice over the fact that Democrats have not learned from their mistake of gambling all their chips on a Mueller investigation that failed to uncover the treasonous evidence they hoped would sink the President.
All of this amounts to a Democratic Party with an uncertain future. The problem is threefold: Democrats can’t agree on a unified vision for the future of their party, they can’t formulate a coherent strategy to defeat Trump at the ballot box, and House members went all-in on an impeachment that isn't likely to survive past the Senate trial.
On the other hand, who can blame them? Democrats know all too well that a second term for Trump will allow him to double-down on his platform, which, at least for now, is presiding over a healthy and robust economy. Trump’s reelection would ensure that hard-fought Democratic initiatives, such as nationalized healthcare, gun control, and a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants, would be shelved and set back for another four years.
Perhaps most importantly, Democrats realize that a two-term Trump would likely have the opportunity to appoint a third and maybe even a fourth judge to the Supreme Court, which would ensure a conservative interpretation of the Constitution for decades to come. Therefore, in the eyes of Democrats, it’s easy to see why desperate times call for desperate measures.
However, if Democrats cannot unify around a single vision and mount a campaign against Trump issue by issue, they will again fall prey to the event about which they were in denial in 2016 - another victory for Trump at the ballot box.
Schweizer:
Warren, Klobuchar Have ‘Cashed in’ from Corruption
Schweizer:
Warren, Klobuchar Have ‘Cashed in’ from Corruption
21 Jan 202023
2:10
Author Peter Schweizer on
Tuesday’s “Fox & Friends” discussed his new book, Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive
Elite, which offers a look into some of
the shady dealings of the United States’ political leaders.
After detailing the corruption seen
among former Vice President Joe Biden and his family, Schweizer described how
his fellow 2020 Democratic presidential candidates Sens. Elizabeth Warren
(D-MA) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) had “cashed in” from corruption.
Schweizer said there is a
“three-layer cake of corruption” with Warren.
“[Warren] was actually a government
consultant paid by the U.S. Congress in the 1990s to rewrite our bankruptcy
laws,” Schweizer outlined. “OK, that’s all fine and good, but she did the
typical Washington crony move: She cashed in. After she rewrote those laws,
what did she do? She went to the corporations who would benefit from the law
and said, ‘Hire me, and I will help you interpret the law that I myself wrote.’
And she made millions of dollars doing that.”
He continued, “She’s also got a
daughter who set up a business. She was setting up that business while
Elizabeth Warren was head of the TARP Oversight Committee, and what ends up
happening is the daughter gets her business financed and gets advisors from the
very investment banks that Elizabeth Warren’s TARP Committee was bailing out.”
Schweizer said Klobuchar has
“mastered the art of shaking down contributors and then pushing their
legislation.”
He stated, “[Klobuchar] was a
prosecutor before she was a U.S. Senator — very selective, did not go after people
that were donors of hers, who were clearly engaged in corruption. And as a U.S.
Senator, she has mastered the art of shaking down contributors and then pushing
their legislation. There are instances where dozens of executives from a
corporation over a three-day period will give her the donation, and then
literally a few days later, she introduces legislation on their behalf.”
Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent
Corruption
blinders of the media and other Democrats
The judge found these
releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall
Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of
the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look
behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United
States during a presidential election.”
*
THE LOOTING
OF AMERICA:
BARACK
OBAMA AND HIS CRONY BANKSTERS set themselves on America’s pensions next!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/obamanomics-assault-on-american-middle.html
The new aristocrats,
like the lords of old, are not bound by the laws that apply to the lower
orders. Voluminous reports have been issued by Congress and government panels
documenting systematic fraud and law breaking carried out by the biggest banks
both before and after the Wall Street crash of 2008.
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and every other major US
bank have been implicated in a web of scandals, including the sale of toxic
mortgage securities on false pretenses, the rigging of international interest
rates and global foreign exchange markets, the laundering of Mexican drug
money, accounting fraud and lying to bank regulators, illegally foreclosing on
the homes of delinquent borrowers, credit card fraud, illegal debt-collection
practices, rigging of energy markets, and complicity in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi
scheme.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
Democrats as a protection
racket? Ed Buck makes it a trifecta
Democratic donor Ed
Buck arrested on drug charges after new overdose at his West Hollywood home
Judicial Watch: Only Crimes in Russia Scandal Are from ‘Obama
Gang’
OBAMA NEEDED THESE ILLEGALS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, WHAT WAS LEFT OF THEM AFTER OBAMA'S CRONY BANKSTERS' PLUNDER.
THE
MAN WHO WOULD BE DICTATOR
Barack
Obama’s Russia Connection
https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/06/barack-obamas-russian-connection-who.html
If
Obama was a fully recruited agent of Moscow, tasked with giving Russia a
significant military advantage over the United States, and economically
weakening and socially dividing the nation, how would he have conducted his
presidency (or his post-presidency) any differently? TREVOR LOUDON
*
///
Democrats Allow Communists to Infiltrate Their
Party Across the Nation
OPERATION
OBOMB:
DESTABILIZE AMERICA TO LAY GROUNDS FOR A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/seth-barron-obama-and-building-of.html
*
Democrats Have Become a
Disfigured Reflection of the Party They Once Were
Democrats' Contempt for the Sanctity of Life
Hillary's going to get in
They Destroyed Our Country
“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they
promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they
made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They understood
he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king,
doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”
Corruption
blinders of the media and other Democrats
Most journalists
and Democrats didn’t express any concerns when:
- VP Biden
threatened (promised) Ukraine that he would cut off a billion dollars in
aid to them if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating a company his
son was involved with.
- Hunter
Biden got paid $50,000 a month as a board member of a corrupt Ukrainian
gas company when he had no expertise on the product of the company.
- Obama
promised the very dangerous Russia and Putin that he would be flexible if
he was reelected (somehow no one at FBI or elsewhere was ever concerned
that Russia may have tried to influence the 2012 election to elect the
flexible president.)
- Hillary,
Obama and many others violated the nation's security laws by using her
non-government computer.
- Obama
gave kickbacks to union supporters when he violated the nation's
bankruptcy law with the bailout of GM.
- Obama
used taxpayer dollars to reward political supporters like at Solyndra.
- Hillary,
through her family and foundation, got huge amounts of speech money and
donations from foreign countries. Russia, for example, got Uranium for
their generosity. (If there is any doubt about whether they were
kickbacks, that should have disappeared when the donations dried up and
speech fees dropped or dried up when she no longer could return favors)
- Obama
shipped over $1 billion in taxpayer money in unmarked bills, to Iran
tyrants, who still pledge death to America, to get a deal.
- Obama
dictatorially stopped a years’ long investigation into a billion dollar a
year drug running ring by terrorists to appease Iranian tyrants because he
was more concerned about his legacy than the safety, health and lives of
the American people.
- Hillary
and the DNC paying over $10 billion to buy a fake dossier from a foreign
national to destroy Trump. It appears they didn't think they could beat
him based on the truth or their policy proposals.
- Obama
and his administration, including the FBI, Justice Department, the
intelligence agencies and the State Department, using the fake dossier as
a source for FISA warrants and to infiltrate the Trump campaign with
informants. (they obviously didn't believe their record or policies would
win the votes). Instead of the media and other Democrats caring about this
pure corruption they have participated in perpetuating the lies about
Russian collusion for over three years.
- The
Obama Administration, at the Justice Department, EPA and CFPB using
taxpayer money for political purposes and political supporters by creating
slush funds from money confiscated from businesses that they pretended
would go to victims.
If the media and Democrats want to investigate anything, how
about a possible corrupt payback from Netflix to Obama? Obama gave the very
wealthy Netlfix, Google and others huge financial benefits with net neutrality
and Netflix gave the Obama's a huge contract even though they had no video
production expertise or experience. It is similar to paying Biden's son huge
amounts of money with no expertise.
But now when President Trump may have said something to a
foreign leader about investigating corruption by Biden's son, that is supposed
to be an impeachable offense. Shouldn't a President want political corruption
by politicians to be investigated? Shouldn't the media and other Democrats be
more concerned about the corruption itself than the phone call?
From this story, it appears that the media and other
Democrats believe that every phone call that Trump makes to a foreign leader
should become public knowledge if any bureaucrat makes a whistle blower report
when they disagree with something the president does. That would certainly be
cumbersome, and foreign leaders would no longer want to have discussions if
every discussion could be made public.
Elizabeth Warren says she wants to get rid of corruption but
not once have I heard her complain about the massive corruption during the
Obama years or at her precious CFPB, so she really doesn't care.
Isn't it odd that no bureaucrats seemed to care about the
corruption of Obama/Biden? It shows why we need to drain the swamp.
GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION
FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS
The judge found these
releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall
Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of
the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look
behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United
States during a presidential election.”
*
“Clinton also
failed to mention how he and Hillary cashed in after his
presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires, in
part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street
bankers.”
THE LOOTING
OF AMERICA:
BARACK
OBAMA AND HIS CRONY BANKSTERS set themselves on America’s pensions next!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/obamanomics-assault-on-american-middle.html
The new aristocrats,
like the lords of old, are not bound by the laws that apply to the lower
orders. Voluminous reports have been issued by Congress and government panels
documenting systematic fraud and law breaking carried out by the biggest banks
both before and after the Wall Street crash of 2008.
Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and every other major US
bank have been implicated in a web of scandals, including the sale of toxic
mortgage securities on false pretenses, the rigging of international interest
rates and global foreign exchange markets, the laundering of Mexican drug
money, accounting fraud and lying to bank regulators, illegally foreclosing on
the homes of delinquent borrowers, credit card fraud, illegal debt-collection
practices, rigging of energy markets, and complicity in the Bernie Madoff Ponzi
scheme.
///
VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal
that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the
world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple
parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid
speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton
Foundation.”
*
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
///
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An
executive nearly broke down crying because
of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay
at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
Democrats as a protection
racket? Ed Buck makes it a trifecta
The New York Times has been trying to
dismiss the arrest of Ed Buck, a Democratic fatcat who had a thing
for injecting young black men with drugs before paying them for sex, as a
"small-time Democratic donor," but the facts on the ground suggest he
was a rather big one. And maybe that's a function of the paper's desire to
protect its masters, the Democrats. They aren't known as Democratic operatives with
bylines for nothing.
While Buck once identified himself as a conservative Republican,
according to the Los Angeles Times, he became a national figure when he
spearheaded the effort to impeach Arizona’s Republican Gov. Evan Mecham in the
1980s. He later made large donations to Democrats, including more than $500,000
since 2007, according to court documents filed by Moore's mother in a wrongful
death suit pertaining to her son.
At the
federal level, those include contributions to prominent Washington lawmakers as
well as 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. At the local
level, Buck has donated more than $51,000 to Los Angeles city and county
officials,
candidates, and affiliated parties dating to 2008.
In 2012, Buck
contributed $100 to the campaign for Jackie Lacey for Los Angeles County District Attorney, and four years later, gave $1,400
to Eric
Garcetti for
Mayor of Los Angeles. Both Lacey and Garcetti still hold their titles.
The highest
contribution was $13,000, according to the court papers, to former West
Hollywood Mayor John Duran when he ran for county supervisor in 2014.
That doesn't sound too small-time to me.
And in fact, his ideological
switcheroo sounds as though he found the Democrats a more suitable protection
racket for his perversions than the Republicans. Who needs political beliefs
when the real belief is perversion and that's what he needs protected?
It's actually part of the pattern
with these scandals. Pervert with big vices donates cash to Democrats to ensure
his protection from the cops. Harvey Weinstein knew it, that was what his
Planned Parenthood and other woke cause donations bought for him - a capacity
to prey on young actresses trying to win roles. Jeffrey Epstein knew it too,
donating to leftist Bill Clinton causes in order to buy enough influence to
enable him to prey on underage girls with impunity, spiriting them to his
pervert island for himself along with his highly connected Democrat
buddies. Both had added payoffs in that Weinstein then had the power to
threaten actresses and reporters who threatened to tell on him, while
Epstein had blackmail material on very powerful people which kept them on
his string.
Now we have the sorry case of Ed Buck, a
creep who enjoyed paying for sex with young black men while poisoning them
with drugs, and then relying on his political donations to ensure the cops
looked the other way. Note that quite a few of his donations were to Los
Angeles local officials, all of them Democrats. Assuming this tweet's images
are not manipulated, look at the range of Buck's Democrats:
https://abc7.com/democratic-donor-ed-buck-arrested-on-drug-charges/5547905/ … Democratic donor Ed Buck
arrested on drug charges after new overdose at his West Hollywood home! @realDonaldTrump @POTUS @SenSchumer @tedlieu @HillaryClinton @CBSThisMorning @GayleKing I see 3 dead people
killed by Ed Buck ... WTF? @FBI @LAPDWestLA
Democratic donor Ed
Buck arrested on drug charges after new overdose at his West Hollywood home
A THIRD death in this guy's house. WTF!? Ed
Buck donated money to Chuck Schumer, Ted Lieu, & Hillary Clinton... was
given a free pass / no repercussions after the first two black guys died (18
months apart) from drug fueled speed & poppers homosexual parties.. @CBSNews
Combine it with media malfeasance - the
mainstream media tried to turn down Ronan Farrow's report on Weinstein, it
tried to pin the Epstein scandal on President Trump, and now it's trying to
persuade us that Buck was just small fry, and the protection racket
seems complete.
With so many of these perverts turning up
in the Democrat donor base as well as organizations such as Planned Parenthood,
one wonders if these are the only ones out there. Is the Democratic Party held
together in no small part by freaks using politics as their 'vaccination'
from scrutiny? Are their perversions and the need to protect them at the root
of why these groups are so powerful and Democrats are so extreme and inflexible
on issues such as abortion? Might that be why they're so out of step with even
the Democratic voting public? And why are the Democrats the more hospitable party
for such a sorry scenario? Why are they the party of perverts? It actually isn't just these three, it's quite a few of
them as I noted here. A lot of such characters have turned up in a very, very
short time and the pattern is exactly the same for each. How many more are
there? What does Ted Lieu, Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats
who've benefited from Buck's bucks have to say about this? And why aren't
all of the Democrats confronting this?
*
IN THE November 2006
election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform. And so, the newly
appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.,
is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior of her colleagues. But
for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own ethical conflict of
interest, say congressional ethics experts.
*
“All in all, it was an incredible victory
for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red China than other
any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
*
“Our entire
crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a
kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the
way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN
THINKER.com
Judicial Watch: Only Crimes in Russia Scandal Are from ‘Obama
Gang’
Katie Pavlich's Latest Books, Fast and Furious: Barack Obama's
Bloodiest Scandal and the Shameless Cover-Up are available on Amazon
FOR EIGHT YEARS BARACK OBAMA AND ERIC HOLDER SABOTAGED HOMELAND
SECURITY TO EASE MORE MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS AND VOTING
BOOTHS.
OBAMA NEEDED THESE ILLEGALS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, WHAT WAS LEFT OF THEM AFTER OBAMA'S CRONY BANKSTERS' PLUNDER.
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered
documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with
the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the
American dole.” Washington Times
THE
MAN WHO WOULD BE DICTATOR
Barack
Obama’s Russia Connection
https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/06/barack-obamas-russian-connection-who.html
If
Obama was a fully recruited agent of Moscow, tasked with giving Russia a
significant military advantage over the United States, and economically
weakening and socially dividing the nation, how would he have conducted his
presidency (or his post-presidency) any differently? TREVOR LOUDON
*
We are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia –
President Trump’s voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair
election process.
///
Democrats Allow Communists to Infiltrate Their
Party Across the Nation
“Obama’s new home in Washington has been described
as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney
general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll” and has
aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former high-level Obama
campaign staffers now work with a variety of groups organizing direct
action against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for example, features
lectures by former campaign executive Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
*
“Professor Paul Kengor has extensively researched the
Chicago communists whose progeny include David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and
Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and
you have many of the key players who put Obama into power.”
*
We
are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia – President Trump’s
voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair election process.
OPERATION
OBOMB:
DESTABILIZE AMERICA TO LAY GROUNDS FOR A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/seth-barron-obama-and-building-of.html
*
“Obama’s new home in Washington has
been described as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition.
Former attorney general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll”
and has aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former
high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a
variety of groups organizing direct action against
Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for example, features
lectures by former campaign executive Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
BARACK OBAMA:
Was he America’s first closet Communist president?
Obama choose Communists and Marxists for the highest,
most powerful positions in our land, including his closest political advisors,
and his head of the CIA. These facts are not in dispute. Most are
openly admitted by the people in question, as necessary damage control.
Our press chooses not to report them.
*
Professor Paul
Kengor has extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include
David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly
Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put Obama
into power.
WAS THE RUSSIAN
HOAX ONLY OBAMA’S ATTEMPT TO PUT ASIDE TRUMP FOR AN OBAMA THIRD TERM FOR
LIFE???
*
*
They Destroyed Our Country
“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they
promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they
made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They
understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made
him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”
*
These people were engaged in a massive political conspiracy. The
Democrats made a decision from the outset—beginning with the election campaign
of the favored candidate of Wall Street and the CIA, Hillary Clinton—that they
would not oppose Trump on his anti-working-class social policy or his
authoritarian hostility to democratic rights and promotion of anti-immigrant
racism, but on issues of imperialist foreign policy.
*
“Obama’s
new home in Washington has been described as the “nerve center” of the
anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney general Eric Holder has said
that Obama is “ready to roll” and has aligned himself with the
“resistance.” Former high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a variety of groups
organizing direct action against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,”
for example, features lectures by former campaign executive
Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
Barack Obama’s plot for a third term for life
A Muslim dictatorship like his crony paymasters, the 9-11
invading Saudis who have financed him for decades.
“Obama has the totalitarian impulse.
After all, he went around saying he didn't have Constitutional authority to
legalize the illegals, and then he tried anyway. The courts stopped him.”
*
What was Obama’s motive? Simple, he knew if he did that
for Hillary, he’d own the next President of the United States, and could
blackmail her with the truth till the end of time. It literally would have
given him a 3rd and 4th term.
THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIAN CONNECTION
*
WITH THESE
TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
*
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided
Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
Democrats Have Become a
Disfigured Reflection of the Party They Once Were
In
an amazingly prophetic story by Isaac Bashevis Singer entitled "The Gentleman
from Cracow," about life in the village of Frampol, where "the food
was scarce and the water foul," one day, a young man, a doctor,
arrives in a carriage drawn by eight horses. He tells the villagers
that his wife and baby have just died in childbirth, and his rabbi had advised
him that his melancholy would disappear in Frampol. He begins to
spend a lot of money in the town, and the town prospers as never
before. He finally decides to marry one of the local
women. On the day of the wedding, "the gentleman from Cracow
revealed his true identity." Who is he? Singer
reveals him to us: "He was no longer the young man the villagers had
welcomed, but a creature covered with scales, with an eye in his chest, and on
his forehead a horn that rotated at great speed. His arms were
covered with hair, thorns, and elflocks, and his tail was a mass of live
serpents, for he was none other than Ketev Mriri, Chief of the Devils."
The
above story could be a parable about the Democratic Party, which can now
rightly be called the Leftocratic Party, as it has embraced extremist socialist
and communist views. Its members have morphed from being a voice of
hope as one of America's two great parties to being properly characterized as
unbelievable liars in their animus toward Pres. Donald J. Trump, voices of
perversion as they publicly condemn any reservations expressed about
"gender fluidity," and anti-prosperity as they wax indignant about
Trump's disengagement from various multilateral deals that drain our
economy. Practical and realistic concerns about Islamic terrorist
threats are dismissed with outraged, scowling faces as vicious, maniacal
racism. Further, the so-called impeachment hearings distorted or
discarded almost every time-honored legal norm under our rule of law.
The
Leftocrats are apologists for evil (not just disagreeable) foreign regimes and are against
fundamental Constitutional ideas and structures such as the Tenth Amendment as
they resist federal disengagement from setting nationwide education
priorities. Leftocrats have been vehemently calling for abolition of
the Electoral College. They are cursing the president from every
podium and venue that presents itself and thereby undermine the separation of
powers and demonstrate disrespect for the law of the land since our president
is head of the Executive Branch.
We
see in their contempt for federal marijuana laws, the institution of sanctuary
cities, and their hostility to border enforcement a deranged lack of
perspective regarding the health of our citizens, many of whom are struggling
with or dying from drug usage. The opioid epidemic we face is clearly
connected to the opioid supply, and that, in turn, is clearly a border
issue. Yet they put aside the well-being of so many poor souls
caught by the hook of addiction into ignoring border enforcement in order to
score political hate points against the president. Instead of
looking at border issues in terms of law and national health, they turn
enforcement into an ugly, defamatory argument about American and Trumpian
racism. Only 14 years ago, they were able to agree with Republicans
on the need for stronger border enforcement, whereas now they try to block
every Trump attempt — mandated by the American people — to bring order out of
chaos on our southern border.
Their
ideas of fairness, justice, family, morality, generosity, love, responsibility
are not American in any meaningful way. Instead of promoting
political ideals consistent with the U.S. history of Judeo-Christian ideas and
ideals (based upon a Protestant foundation derived from English speaking
Protestants, albeit with overlays of other Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish
traditions), they have derived most of their ideas from abstractions based
in cultural Marxism.
The
phrase "melting pot" had gained wide currency in 1908, during the
great wave of Slavic, Jewish, and Italian immigration, when Israel Zangwill's
play "The Melting Pot" was produced. In it, a character says with enthusiasm, "America is God's
crucible, the great melting-pot where all the races of Europe are melting and
re-forming!"
Beginning
in the 1960s, instead of the melting pot, the multiculturalists — rooted in the
cultural Marxism of Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Eric
Fromm, Antonio Gramsci, and others — began
affirming the diversity "salad bowl" image. Our national
motto: E pluribus unum ("out of many one") has
been stood on its head, whereby the goal of the nation is purported as
fulfilled only by highlighting and praising the distinctions of every
sub-cultural group in the U.S. by age, ethnicity, immigrant status, sexual
deviancy (preference), and all "protected classes." The
cultural Marxists want us to believe that the melting pot ideal was a deception
imposed on society as a whole by white, male, straight Christians and that the
melting pot ideal lacked truth, democratic values, and social
vigor. The masses and certain groups in particular were shunted
aside, dispossessed, ignored, or brutalized. America, despite its
apparent successes, was sucking the hope and lifeblood out of the masses of
people.
For
those of us who have witnessed the progress of African-Americans since the days
of Jim Crow and have experienced the economic and social progress of
generations produced by the dirt-poor, non-English-speaking immigrants, the
harsh criticisms of America by the Leftocrats has morphed into an outrageous
and almost demonic defiance of reason. Where is the balance, the
display of reasonableness, the acceptance of others? Instead, we see
an unbridled, vulgar, destructive mindset on display everywhere in the party of
derangement. Just consider the language used about Trump by Robert De Niro or the mock bloody beheadings of our
president. Consider the evil assassin who tried to kill Republican congressmen in Florida.
The
Democrats now rightly can be renamed Leftocrats. Their hostility to
President Trump has reached pathological dimensions or worse. Their
mantras about the "top 1%" or "top 0.1%" have become the
tip of a spear of seemingly bottomless hatred for our president, our history,
our legal structures, our institutions, our religious heritage, our language,
and our achievements in every sphere of human endeavor. They have
left the realm of constructive criticism and have moved even beyond destructive
criticism into the pathological domain of hysterical dementia — or, as with
Singer's story, a level of unhingedness even beyond the ken of psychiatry.
Democrats' Contempt for the Sanctity of Life
Ed Buck, a prominent Democrat donor and fundraiser, has
been charged with battery,
administering illegal drugs, and operating a drug house. The charges
paint a disturbing picture of this wealthy scion of liberal
politics. At this time, two men have been identified as having died
and a third having been seriously harmed, but prosecutors are said to have
found hundreds of photographs "of men in compromising positions" who may have
been lured to Buck's home with the promise of money, shelter, and drugs.
This case raises many questions, not just concerning the several
felonies with which Buck has been charged, but about the morality of this and
other prominent liberals. On what basis could any human being engage
in sexual conduct with "hundreds" of unfortunate human beings, using
them like playthings and then casting them aside? What does such
conduct suggest about the capacity of some individuals to use others for their
personal pleasure, regardless of the dangerous consequences
involved?
Certainly, conservatives are far from perfect, but at least
conservatives do not flaunt their iniquities. Conservatives as
individuals possess all the imperfections of other men, but they still ascribe
to an ideal of goodness and virtue. The same cannot be said for
liberals, who believe that they should rack up as much pleasure as possible in
this world because they are sure there's no life after death.
For liberals, what happens in the Oval Office stays in the Oval
Office. Many Democrats thought Bill Clinton was just being Clinton
and that there was nothing especially immoral about conducting affairs with
aides, state employees, actresses, and nursing home managers. Was this
because they did not appreciate the sanctity of those who served as mere
diversion for our 42nd president?
Just what is so appealing to liberals about promiscuity,
anyway? Is it just sex, or is there a special satisfaction in
transgressing traditional moral codes? Is it the idea that one is
"bigger" than the law? Or is it that liberals believe that
the rules no longer apply? Is it beneath them to believe in marital
fidelity and lifetime devotion to one's spouse? Liberals think they
are too sophisticated for this kid of trust, just as they think telling the
truth is Boy Scout stuff and election promises are made to be
broken. "If you like your doctor, you can keep your
doctor." Yeah, right.
Conservatives are different. We at least hold up the
ideal of devotion, honesty, and truth-telling, and though we're not perfect, we
try to be. That's especially the case when it involves the sanctity
of life. Conservatives defend the unborn, defend their families, and
defend their God-given liberties. Conservatives know that all of
God's creation is sacred, and it is that knowledge that makes them act with
restraint and care. That is the essence of conservatism.
The essence of liberalism, as I see it, is a lack of restraint
rooted in egotism and self. The Warren presidential campaign is a
perfect example. If elected, Elizabeth Warren will, according to her
own admission, attempt
to closely regulate all large businesses, eliminate fracking
and the jobs that go with it, provide Medicare for All, dictate health care
decisions (including practically unlimited abortion "rights"),
eliminate capital punishment, raise taxes on the wealthy and on corporations,
provide free college, cancel student debt, eliminate the Electoral College, ban
assault weapons, open our borders, legalize marijuana, and significantly cut
the defense budget.
Warren's policies show her
to be an extremist driven by ideology rather than concern for the individuals whom
she would tax, endanger, disenfranchise, and tyrannize with regulation and
social mandates. Where is her concern for the individuals whose
lives she would alter so radically with her sweeping reforms? Those
lives are sacred, their right to prosper and save is sacred, and their right to
safety and security is sacred. Warren does not seem to have thought
much about the dangers of unrestrained immigration or the fact that a weakened
national defense will put all Americans at risk. What is she
describing is tyranny, plain and simple.
The most obvious example of liberal denial of the sanctity of
life, of course, is liberals' position on abortion. For any person
who truly believes in the sanctity of life, abortion must be
repugnant. One point six million abortions, terminating
approximately one quarter of all pregnancies, are performed every year in the
U.S. At this rate, that would amount to 80 million abortions over
the past 50 years. Imagine the loss of those beautiful human souls.
Or are they
beautiful? Liberals do not believe so. They tell us that
the earth has become overpopulated. It is "the earth" that
matters and not human beings. Or they say the mothers of those
unborn children would not be able to care for them and that the children would
just become a burden on the State. The "burden on the
State" is more important than the unborn child.
What you will never hear from a liberal is the idea that every
child, born and unborn, is sacred. A child is worth that burden and
worth the stress he purportedly places on "the earth." A
time is coming when America will wish that it had those 80 million souls to
defend it and help it prosper. That ability to contribute to society
and pursue economic opportunity, and to fight if necessary to defend one's
home, is another side of what makes every child sacred. Children are
sacred because of their capacity for goodness, beauty, and life, but also
because they will grow into adults who take responsibility for themselves and
for their neighbors.
Would any conservative vote to end the life of 80 million human
beings?
I believe that every human being is God's creation and that
everyone is born with the potential to contribute and achieve. Our
Founders believed in limited government because they too believed in human
potential, and they feared the tyranny of authoritarianism. They had
reason to fear, having lived under the yoke of British colonial rule.
It is no accident that those who seek a vast expansion of
government power today also oppose the sanctity of life. A free
people engaged in productive endeavors will never vote for a socialist who will
suppress their freedom. What today's tyrants fear above all is a
public that believes in the sanctity of life and is willing to stand up for it.
Jeffrey Folks is the author
of many books and articles on American culture including Heartland
of the Imagination (2011).
So is running for president now a corrupt Democrat's 'get out of jail free'
card?
Based on today's
standards, promoted in Congress and the press, Democratic Party candidates,
such as Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, can greatly enrich their
families with massive amounts of money from foreign parties, and a Republican
president or its Justice department are not even allowed to bring up their
names, let alone research their obvious corruption. Most of the media and
other Democrats are now calling President Trump's bid to get to the bottom of
the ongoing corruption we see 'impeachable' and they couldn't care less about
corruption as they preach that no one is above the law.
Democrats can seek trash
on their Republican opponents from foreign nationals and not only do most
journalists and other Democrats not care, they can use a fake dossier
full of opposition research as grist for an FBI investigation in their bid to
take out Trump. Then, if Trump brings up Biden’s name to a foreign leader, they
call that illegal and impeachable.
A Democrat, her staff and
many at the State Department and other agencies can continually violate the
nation's security laws (as Clinton did) and the Justice Department inexplicably
lets her off. Most journalists and other Democrats support her and call it
partisan to look at the clear violations of the law as they lecture everyone
that no one is above the law.
A Democrat and her spouse
can physically and mentally abuse women (again, the Clinton pair) and seek to
destroy anyone who gets in their way as they amass power. Most
journalists and other Democrats don’t give a damn about any of the abused women
with credible claims against Bill or Hillary Clinton even as they say how
pro-women they are.
A Democrat commits fraud
throughout her adult life by lying about her heritage to move up the economic
ladder (Elizabeth Warren) and most journalists and other Democrats will support
her. In fact, they've made her the frontrunner in the current Democratic
nomination for president polls.
Democrat candidates can
seek to destroy and impeach Judge Brett Kavanaugh based on articles the media
has published with no evidence to support the stories. And the media pretends
their stories are based on facts. How can they expect the public to believe
them when they ran years of stories on Russian collusion when there was never
any evidence?
Democrat candidates
continually lie about what Trump said in Charlottesville and lie about
Ferguson, Missouri to gin up racial hate and violence and they are
supported wholeheartedly by the complicit media as they pretend they are the
party of unity and the truthful party.
Democrat bureaucrats in
the Obama administration, at Justice, CIA, other intelligence agencies and at
the State Department continually lie to justify spying to take out Trump while
they protect Hillary from prosecution. But if the Trump administration looks at
the origins of the fake Russian collusion narrative, that is impeachable and
partisan. The compliant media doesn’t give a darn about the clear violations of
the law and abuse of power while they continually say that no one is above the
law.
A Democrat president
can violate the Constitution with DACA, be flexible with Russia, give kickbacks
to Iran tyrants, stop an investigation into drug running by terrorists to
appease Iran, violate bankruptcy laws, have slush funds at Justice, CFPB and
EPA to reward political supporters, illegally unmask names of people
surrounding Trump, leave Americans to die in Libya while concocting a lie, spy
illegally on thousands of Americans, imprison reporters, look the other way as
his Secretary of State violates security laws and takes kickbacks, Look the
other way as Obama administration officials such as Eric Holder, John Brennan,
James Clapper, Susan Rice and others commit perjury, withhold documents from
Congress for years on Fast and Furious, prosecute whistleblowers for violation
of the espionage act, cage and separate children at the border and all his
conversations with foreign leaders will remain private.
As the media watched all
this clear corruption unfold throughout eight years of Obama, almost all
journalists and other Democrat supported him, called him brilliant and to this
date pretend the Obama administration was scandal-free as they tell the public
that no one is above the law.
Known serial liars
Clapper, Brennan, Holder, plus creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti are
treated as reliable sources by almost all media outlets as they trash Trump.
Meanwhile, whatever Trump
does is impeachable, even if it is only bringing up Biden’s name to investigate
clear corruption. According to the media, as they collude with other Democrats,
it appears that every one of Trump’s phone calls should be made public.
And any disgruntled
Democrat bureaucrat who leaks information, whether or not they had firsthand
knowledge, should be treated as a protected whistleblower instead of a leaker.
Republicans are welcome
as reliable sources in the media, like Senators Mitt Romney, John McCain or
Jeff Flake, as long as they are trashing Trump. Otherwise they are not
welcome.
It is so hard to spot the
bias as the media trashes Trump and his supporters, daily, with every name in
the book and lecture the public that no one is above the law and how the
Democrat party is the party of unity.
Image credit: Photo illustration by
Monica Showalter with use of image by Michael Vadon, via
Wikimedia Commons // CC BY-SA 2.0.
Hillary's going to get in
It
is no longer a matter of if but of when. All doubts about Hillary's 2020
plans should have been erased by her appearances this week promoting the book
that she and her daughter “wrote” to say nothing about her mien! She
endlessly reprised her absurd claim
that the election was stolen from her, called for Trump's impeachment, and even
admitted to her gutsiness for standing by her man.
I
think she has always been in the race, covertly, and that she and Bill always
assumed that no candidate would arrive at the convention with enough delegates
to win the nomination on the first ballot, at which point she could be put
forth as a compromise.
Biden's
done for; there is no way he is going to survive the imbroglio surrounding his
son's machinations and profiteering in Ukraine and China. There's too
much there there. It will become inescapable, even to the unwashed, that
the only reason money flowed to Hunter Biden was to gain influence with Joe or
gain benefits through Joe and his network of friends and allies.
Joe’s
always been a placeholder for Hillary, whether he realizes it or not. It’s all
has changed now because Biden's done, and could precipitate Hillary's early
entry into the fray, as not only Biden but Bernie Sanders may be leaving the
field. With their supporters potentially up for grabs, Elizabeth Warren could
end up with a first ballot victory.
Hillary
has to know that she is considered to be unlikable, but I think it is a given
that no one likes Warren,
either. Daniel Greenfield compares her to Hillary here:
Warren’s likability deficit has nothing to do
with her gender....[She ripped] off asbestos victims while pocketing a tidy
sum....The ‘Hillariness’ of Warren doesn’t [just] lie in their shared fabulism
or lack of ethics....[her] a complete lack of qualifications....[or because
both are] inauthentic scolds who suffer from hall monitor syndrome. They spent
their entire lives breaking every rule they could find while awkwardly
fantasizing about running every tiny detail of everyone else’s
lives....[They're] both unlikable because you can’t picture either one having
any fun....[C]ombine that with an obsessive need to monitor, regulate and
eradicate other people’s fun, and you have the miserable essence of the
progressive movement.
Hillary,
and Bill, know that this is their [third] last chance, and they're not going to
let another woman snatch it from her, as that “articulate and
bright and clean and a nice-looking” black guy or that entitled creep
did. So, keep an eye out, for “when” is going to be sooner than anyone
expected.
Now,
can she win this time? Only a fool would count her out. She won't
lose Biden's supporters. Just being a woman will get her many of Warren's
female supporters. Despite Trump's inroads with African-American and
Hispanic voters, she'll find considerable support in those groups. Wall
Street, Hollywood, and the MSM love her. Traditional Democrats, not
wanting four more years of uproar, may return to the fold over Ukraine and the
like.
She'll
work harder this time, if she can uphold under the effort, bringing
Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin into the picture.
She'll be better prepared to debate Trump, but that may not mean much since
Trump's hard to out-debate.
Settle
into the chair, get out the popcorn, the show's about to begin. If you
doubt it, then I have a walking trail in Chappaqua to sell you.
The author is retired, his profile may be
found on LinkedIn, and he usually responds to emails sent
to ringchadburn@hotmail.com
.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment