Did
you know illegals kill 12 Americans a day?
“In other words, it would be much harder to arrest an illegal
alien in this country than it is to arrest you. They’re the protected class
here. You’re just some loser who’s paying for it all.” TUCKER CARLSON
But believe it or not, we save the nuttiest part of this
legislation for last, and here’s what it is. What could be more destructive
than changing U.S. law specifically to allow rapists, child molesters, and drug
dealers to stay in America? How about this: using taxpayer money to bring
deported criminals back into America. That’s right. This bill would not only
abolish your right to control who lives in your country, but it invents a brand
new right, “the right to come home.” TUCKER CARLSON
A growing wing of the Democratic Party views America itself as
essentially a legitimate, a rogue state in which everything must be destroyed
and remade — our laws, our institutions, our customs, our freedoms, our
history, our values. TUCKER CARLSON
(CNSNews.com) - Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) made more than 105,000 criminal arrests last year and
removed more than 145,000 criminal aliens, “to include the arrests of nearly
10,000 gang members and the removal of another 6,000,” acting ICE Director Matt
Albence said Thursday.
MEXICO DOES NOT WANT THEIR CRIMINALS BACK.
206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206
criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.
Why do Americans still protect the illegals??
Carlson
Warns of ‘Radical’ New Way Forward Act Protecting Criminals from Deportation —
‘Makes the Green New Deal Look Like the Status Quo’
7 Feb 2020232
10:45
During his monologue on Thursday, Fox News Channel host Tucker
Carlson sounded an alarm for what he deemed to be a radical piece of
legislation engineered and championed by congressional Democrats that would
change longstanding immigration policy and law in America.
The bill, called the New Way Forward Act, would remove the
threat of deportation for immigrants convicted of serious crimes.
Transcript as follows:
Crime and violence are the clearest possible signs that a
society isn’t functioning as it should. If they increase to a certain point,
societies don’t function at all, and we should be worried about that always. We
ought to be doing all that we can to build a place, a country where people who
follow the law are rewarded; those who flout it are punished, and above all,
children can live in peace and safety.
They used to be obvious. It’s not obvious anymore. At this
moment, there’s a bill pending in the Congress called the New Way Forward Act.
It’s received almost no publicity, and that’s unfortunate, as well as
revealing. The legislation is sponsored by 44 House Democrats, including
Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. It is roughly 4,400 words long. That
means, it’s almost exactly as long as the U.S. Constitution. Like the
Constitution, it is designed to create a whole new country.
BLOG: CALIFORNIA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON
SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY. HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.
ACCORDING TO FORMER CA ATTORNEY GENEARL KAMALA HARRIS, HALF THE
MURDERS IN MEXIFORNIA ARE NOW BY MEX GANGS.
93% OF THE MURDERS IN MEXICO’S SECOND LARGEST CITY OF LOS
ANGELES ARE BY MEXICANS.
The bill would entirely remake immigration system with the
explicit purpose of ensuring that criminals are able to move to the United
States and settle here permanently with immunity. They may think we’re exaggerating for effect, but we’re not
exaggerating, not even a little bit. The New Way Forward Act is the single most
radical piece of legislation we have ever seen proposed in this country — ever.
It makes the Green New Deal like the status quo. The document produced by
Democrats to promote the bill says this, and we’re quoting it verbatim, “Convictions
should not lead to deportation.”
Now, keep in mind, we’re not talking about convictions for
double parking or even for DUI. The bill targets felony convictions, serious
crimes that could send you to prison for years, and should. A press release
from Congressman Jesus Garcia of Illinois is explicit about this. Garcia brags
that the bill will break the “prison to deportation pipeline.” Something
most of us are for. So how does the bill do that? Well, under current U.S. law,
legal U.S. immigrants can be deported if they commit “aggravated felony” or a
crime of moral turpitude that is a vile, depraved act like molesting children.
Under the New Way Forward Act, crimes of moral turpitude are
eliminated entirely as justification for deportation and the category of
aggravated felony gets eliminated, too.
So what does that mean? Consider this. Under current law,
immigrants who commit serious crimes, robbery to fraud to child sexual abuse,
must be deported regardless of the sentences they receive. Other crimes, less
severe ones like racketeering require deportation if the perpetrator receives
at least a one-year sentence.
Under this bill, they will no longer be any crime that
automatically requires deportation. None. And one crime, falsifying a passport
would be made immune from deportation, no matter what, because apparently, 9/11
never even happened, and we no longer care about fake government documents. By
the way, if you just renewed your driver’s license to comply with the Real ID
Act, you must feel like an idiot. Because immigrants are getting a pass, you’re
not.
Under the proposed legislation for crimes that would still allow
deportation, the required prison sentence would rise from one year to five
years. We checked the Bureau of Justice Statistics. According to Federal data,
crimes like car theft, fraud and weapons offenses all carry average prison
sentences of fewer than five years. And that’s just looking at averages. There
are people who commit rape, child abuse, even manslaughter, and get sentences
with fewer than five years. Lots of them actually.
If the New Way Forward Act passes, immigrants who commit those
crimes and receive those sentences would remain in this country, and of course,
they will be eligible for citizenship day one, too, of course. But even that is
understanding the law’s effect. Even a five-year prison sentence wouldn’t
necessarily be enough to trigger deportation. The bill would grant sweeping new
powers to immigration judges allowing them to nullify a deportation order.
The only requirement for that is, “The immigration judge find
such an exercise of discretion appropriate in pursuant of humanitarian purposes
to ensure family unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.” Talk
about open-ended. In other words, anti-American immigration judges, and
there are a lot of those in this country would have a blank check to open the
borders. You would not be voting on this. It would happen anyway.
Is this shocking you yet? Because we’re just getting started. We
read this proposed legislation. Here’s another point.
Current U.S. law makes drug addiction grounds for deportation,
because why wouldn’t it? This bill would eliminate that statute. Current law
also states that those who have committed drug crimes abroad or “any crimes
involving moral turpitude are ineligible to immigrate here.” The New Way
Forward Act abolishes that statute. So a Mexican drug cartel leader could be
released from prison, can freely come to America immediately. And if he
wants, he can come here illegally, and it still wouldn’t be a crime because —
and you are waiting for this part — the bill also decriminalizes illegal entry
into America even by those we’ve previously deported.
In other words, you break our law, we send you out, you come
back, you break it again, you can stay.
According to a document promoting this bill. Criminalizing
illegal entry into America is “white supremacist.” That’s a quote, white
supremacist. Now, by this point, you’re beginning to wonder, are we making this
up? We’re not making it up. In fact, we’re barely halfway through the bill. The
legislation doesn’t just make it harder to deport illegal immigrants who commit
crimes. It doesn’t just make it easier for criminals to move here illegally,
though it does both, the bill would also effectively abolish all existing
enforcement against illegal immigration.
To detain illegal immigrants, I.C.E. would have to prove in
court that they are dangerous or a flight risk. But of course, I.C.E. wouldn’t
be allowed to use a detainee’s prior criminal behavior as proof of danger.
That’s banned. I.C.E. would have to overcome even more hurdles if the detainee
claims to be gay or transgendered. If they’re under 21 or if they can’t speak
English, an interpreter isn’t immediately available, they get a pass.
In other words, it would be much harder to arrest an illegal
alien in this country than it is to arrest you. They’re the protected class
here. You’re just some loser who’s paying for it all.
But believe it or not, we save the nuttiest part of this
legislation for last, and here’s what it is. What could be more destructive
than changing U.S. law specifically to allow rapists, child molesters, and drug
dealers to stay in America? How about this: using taxpayer money to bring
deported criminals back into America. That’s right. This bill would not only
abolish your right to control who lives in your country, but it invents a brand
new right, “the right to come home.”
It orders the government to create a “pathway for those
previously deported to apply to return to their homes and families in the
United States” as long as they would have been eligible to stay under the new
law. It’s retroactive in other words. D.H.S. must spend taxpayer dollars
transporting convicted criminal illegal aliens back into the United States. I
am not making this up.
So who would be eligible for these flights? Tens of thousands of
people we kicked out of this country for all kinds of crimes: Sexual abuse,
robbery, assault, drug trafficking, weapons trafficking, human trafficking.
From 2002 to 2018, four hundred and eighty thousand people were deported for
illegal entry or re-entry into America. And under this bill, you’d have to buy
each of them a plane ticket to come home.
Those tickets alone would cost about a billion dollars, and
that’s before Democrats make you start paying for these criminals free
healthcare, too, which they plan to do and have said so. The New Way Forward
Act fundamentally inverts every assumption you have about this country. Under
this legislation, the criminals are now the victims. Law enforcement is
illegitimate. It’s racist, just like the country you live in, just like you
are.
Now, the only solution is to get rid of both. America would be
better off as a borderless rest stop for the world’s predators and parasites. That’s the point of this. And we’re not overstating it, go read
it. This is a big deal. This is not a small thing. It’s not renaming a Post
Office. It’s hard to believe any American would put these ideas on paper, much
less try to pass them into law. And yet remarkably, that’s happening.
And even more remarkably, the press has ignored it. This isn’t
happening in secret. It is happening in the House of Representatives. Scores of
Democrats have backed this bill. But the legislation has not been mentioned in
“The New York Times.” It has not been mentioned on CNN, a news or even in
self-described conservative outlets like “National Review.” No mention.
Consider if this were working the other way. If a lone — I don’t
know Republican state legislator from Minot, North Dakota had proposed to build
this extreme that would remake America completely, the President himself would
be expected to answer for it. CNN would demand that he disavow it even if
you’ve never heard of it before. But when one-fifth of the entire Democratic
Caucus backs a bill demanding that you import illegal alien felons and then pay
for it, it’s a non-event in the American media. They don’t think you should
know about it. And that’s dangerous, if we’re being honest.
Whether the press cares or not, these are the stakes of the 2020
election, and you have a right to know what they are. A growing wing of the
Democratic Party views America itself as essentially a legitimate, a rogue
state in which everything must be destroyed and remade — our laws, our
institutions, our customs, our freedoms, our history, our values.
And of course, what’s the point of all of this? An entirely new
country in which resistance is crushed, and they’re in charge forever.
THE
INVADING CRIMINALS:
A county by county
chart:
Immigration, Citizenship, and the Federal Justice System,
1998-2018
By Mark Motivans
DOJ Office of Justice Programs, August 2019
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/icfjs9818.pdf
Highlights: Based on fiscal years—
The portion of total federal arrests that took place in the five judicial
districts along the In 1998, 63% of all federal arrests were U.S.-Mexico border
almost doubled from 1998 of U.S. citizens; in 2018, 64% of all (33%) to 2018
(65%) (table 6). federal arrests were of non-U.S. citizens Ninety-five percent
of the increase in federal (figure 1 and table 4). arrests across 20 years was
due to immigration Non-U.S. citizens, who make up 7% of the offenses (table 1).
U.S. population (per the U.S. Census Bureau In 2018, 90% of suspects arrested
for federal for 2017) , accounted for 15% of all federal immigration crimes
were male; 10% were arrests and 15% of prosecutions in U.S. district female
(table 9).
DOJ: 64% of Federal Arrests in
2018 Were of Non-U.S. Citizens
Listen to the Article!
(CNSNews.com)
- Approximately 64 percent of the arrests that the federal government made in
fiscal 2018 were of non-U.S. citizens, according to a report released today by the Justice Department’s
Bureau of Justice Statistics.
That
represents a dramatic change from just two decades ago, when approximately 63
percent of federal arrests were of citizens and only approximately 37 percent
were of non-citizens.
Crimes by
Illegal Immigrants Widespread Across US – Sanctuaries
Shouldn’t Shield Them
Democrats seek to suppress Sanders victory in Iowa
The effort by the Democratic Party establishment to conceal or suppress reports of Senator Bernie Sanders’ victory in the Iowa caucuses reached a new stage Thursday with Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez calling on the Iowa Democratic Party to “immediately begin a recanvass” of the state.
The twitter statement by Perez came only hours after the final figures from the Iowa Democratic Party showed Sanders more than 6,000 votes ahead of former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg in the February 3 caucuses, and behind by only two “state delegate equivalents,” out of 2,152, in the process that will lead to the awarding of Iowa’s delegates to the Democratic national convention.
With all but one of nearly 1,800 precincts tallied, Sanders led Buttigieg by 43,671 to 37,557 votes, with Senator Elizabeth Warren in third place with 32,553, among initial ballots cast at the caucuses. Sanders had 24.8 percent of the vote compared to 21.3 percent for Buttigieg.
Democratic presidential candidate Senator Bernie Sanders speaks to supporters in Des Moines, Iowa, February 3, 2020 [Credit: AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais]
Sanders had a smaller lead in the second round, after those backing “unviable candidate” (those with less than 15 percent support) were allowed to switch their votes. Buttigieg’s lead in “state delegate equivalents” arises from the overrepresentation of rural areas, where he ran stronger, in the apportioning of delegates.
The statement by Perez appeared to have two purposes: to provide cover for the Democratic Party in response to widespread accounts of inaccuracies and contradictions in the Iowa vote reporting, including a lengthy account posted on the New York Times website Thursday; and to further muddy the outcome of the caucuses, in which Sanders won a clear popular vote victory despite the effective tie in the number of delegates won.
Sanders wiped out Buttigieg’s narrow lead in delegates thanks to votes in satellite caucuses, which were held outside normal hours or outside the state to accommodate voters unable to attend the regular caucuses that began at 7 p.m. Monday night. In two results reported Thursday, one satellite caucus for night-shift workers at a food processing plant in Ottumwa, and the other for students and workers at Drake University in Des Moines, Sanders collected nine “state delegate equivalents” compared to zero for Buttigieg.
It is noteworthy that Perez issued his statement knowing that Sanders was about to hold a press conference in New Hampshire, where he is campaigning for the February 11 primary, to declare victory in Iowa. Sanders again refused to make any criticism of the Iowa Democratic Party for delaying the report of the results for many days.
In his tweet, Perez acknowledged “problems that have emerged in the implementation of the delegate selection plan” and urged a complete recanvass “in order to assure public confidence in the results.” A DNC official told the press that this would involve a hand audit of worksheets and reporting forms from every precinct and satellite caucus, checking for inconsistencies, mathematical errors and other mistakes. The scale of such an effort could postpone any final report of the Iowa results for days, and perhaps even until after the New Hampshire primary, the second contest in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Tom Perez (Credit: Flickr.com, Gage Skidmore)
Iowa state Democratic Party Chairman Troy Price said that he was prepared to order a recanvass, but only if requested by one of the campaigns, not by Perez, who has no actual authority to order the review. None of the campaigns has yet requested a recanvass, and it is not clear that any of them will, since those candidates who finished below the top two, including Warren, former Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Amy Klobuchar, want the public to forget about Iowa as quickly as possible.
The dueling statements from Perez and Price conceal their underlying political alignment: Price was the Iowa state director for Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016 before becoming state chairman; Perez was the choice of the Clinton wing of the party to head the DNC, narrowly defeating Representative Keith Ellison, backed by Sanders and Pete Buttigieg in his first national effort. Both Price and Perez are adamantly opposed to the nomination of Sanders, who calls himself a “democratic socialist.”
The New York Times account, under the headline, “Many Errors Are Evident in Iowa Caucus Results Released Wednesday,” was based on a precinct-by-precinct analysis that suggested both math errors in the tallies and more serious violations of rules governing the caucuses, including more people voting in the second round than in the first, and votes being subtracted from “viable” candidates, when their totals should only have increased.
The Times claimed there was no pattern in the errors, in terms of favoring Buttigieg or Sanders, the two leading candidates. Its analysis did not include well publicized and cruder errors in the initial count, such as awarding hundreds of Sanders votes to former Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, who did not campaign in Iowa, and hundreds of Warren votes to billionaire Tom Steyer. These mistakes were publicly corrected by the Iowa Democratic Party, but they obviously did not add to the credibility of the overall result.
The figures showed the gap between Buttigieg and Sanders, in terms of “state delegate equivalents,” narrowing to near nonexistence. That did not stop the bulk of the corporate media from continuing to present Buttigieg as the surprise victor in Iowa and Sanders as the second-place finisher, and even claiming that Sanders’ comfortable lead in the polls ahead of the New Hampshire primary was in danger.
An example of this was a headline on the website of Newsweek magazine, which read, “Pete Buttigieg Gaining Quickly In New Hampshire As Bernie Sanders Stalls: Poll.” The article was actually reporting a poll in which Sanders led with 31 percent of the vote, with Buttigieg in second place at 21 percent. The report admitted that “Sanders maintains a healthy lead in the state where he won more than 60 percent of votes in the 2016 contest.”
The main concern of the Democratic establishment is not Sanders himself—a proven defender of capitalism and a longtime collaborator with the Democratic Party leadership in the Senate and House. It is that the nomination of a candidate who publicly (if less and less frequently) embraces the socialist label and who professes his opposition to war and militarism could provide encouragement to the leftward movement of millions of working people and youth who are looking for a way to fight back against the capitalist system.
There are further signs of the deep political crisis wracking the Democratic Party. Campaigning in New Hampshire, former Vice President Biden took up the anti-socialist cudgel wielded by Trump in his State of the Union address. “If Senator Sanders is the nominee for the party, every Democrat in America up and down the ballot, in blue states, red states, purple states, easy districts and competitive ones, every Democrat will have to carry the label Senator Sanders has chosen for himself,” Biden said. “He calls him—and I don’t criticize him—he calls himself a democratic socialist.”
The Biden campaign was in visible crisis, purging both the Iowa state director and the Iowa field director after the dismal showing there, and shifting advertising money from the South Carolina primary on February 29 to the Nevada caucuses February 22 in an effort to avoid losing the first three contests in the Democratic race. Biden admitted in one campaign appearance Wednesday that the Iowa caucus had been a “gut punch” to his campaign.
Meanwhile, the Sanders campaign announced that it had raised $25 million from more than 648,000 donors in January, the best fundraising month of the campaign, with an average donation of $18, most of it on-line. These included 219,000 first-time donors. A campaign statement declared, “Working class Americans giving $18 at a time are putting our campaign in a strong position to compete in states all over the map.” According to Sanders aides, “teacher” was the most common occupation, and the top five employers of those making contributions were Amazon, Starbucks, Walmart, the US Postal Service and Target.
No comments:
Post a Comment