Religious freedom watchdog groups are accusing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) of using the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic as an opportunity to intensify their crackdown on religion, bulldozing some churches and placing others under heavy surveillance.
“China is now holding itself up as a model for fighting the coronavirus. But fighting the pandemic hasn’t stopped communist officials from persecuting Christians,” Todd Nettleton, a spokesman for the nonprofit group Voice of the Martyrs (VOM), told Fox News on Tuesday.
Another prominent activist, Bob Fu of China Aid, shared a video of Chinese officials demolishing a church in the city of Yixing:
Other churches have reportedly been vandalized by Chinese officials and orders have been given that effectively ban “unregistered” religious services on the grounds of public health. On the bright side, VOM saw the prevalence of medical masks due to the coronavirus as an opportunity to evade China’s pervasive facial-recognition systems and proselytize with less fear of being identified and persecuted.
Buddhists and Taoists also reported the suppression and demolition of their temples, a process that appeared to be intensifying just as the coronavirus exploded out of Wuhan. Worshipers bitterly noted that local officials have a habit of abruptly deciding that temples built with their approval failed to meet some obscure building code and must be demolished immediately. Not even hoisting Communist flags and papering temples with posters of China’s authoritarian ruler Xi Jinping was enough to save the targeted temples.
“Unconditional cooperation with the government means that no photos of the demolition can be taken, no negotiations initiated, and no compensation demanded. This is typical behavior of the CCP government,” one Buddhist complained to the Bitter Winter human rights website.
“The Communist Party is as evil as a mafia. Under the tyranny of those modern bandits, even sacred Buddhist temples cannot enjoy peace,” said another.
Churches that do not get knocked flat are encrusted with surveillance cameras to terrorize the congregations, and perhaps build up “evidence” of incorrect speech that can be used as an excuse to wipe out the church, as detailed in another Bitter Winter post:
According to a Three-Self preacher from Lankao county in Henan’s Kaifeng city, powerful cameras, over 10,000 RMB (about $ 1,400) each, have been installed in at least eight Three-Self churches, images from which are displayed on a large screen in the hall of the county’s Two Chinese Christian Councils. Who leads Sunday services, what sermons are about, and how many congregation members are present—everything is under the government’s close surveillance.
“The surveillance equipment is powerful; it can catch every single word in the church,” a Three-Self church director in Lankao county explained. “We can get into trouble for making an incautious remark. Believers don’t dare to even chitchat with each other under such surveillance.” He once received a phone call from a local official less than one hour after he complained about the government.
In August 2019, over 100 cameras were installed in several Three-Self churches in Yi’nan county in Linyi, a prefecture-level city in the eastern province of Shandong. A local government insider revealed to Bitter Winter that the Religious Affairs Bureau and United Front Work Department use the cameras to monitor activities in churches, and those refusing to have cameras installed would be shut down.
As some preachers and church directors learned to their cost, unplugging the security cameras is treated as a crime and swiftly punished by arrest, interrogation, confiscation of church property, and possibly destruction of the church, or even the personal residence of the preacher. According to several sources in China, the CCP now grades churches on a 100-point scale of obedience, deducts points for offenses such as improperly-displayed Communist flags and slogans, and shuts houses of worship down if their score falls under 60.
Reps. Jim Banks (R-IN) and Seth Moulton (D-MA) introduced a bill condemning the Chinese government for its handling of the coronavirus outbreak, in a sign of bipartisan anger against China.
The bill expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the “Governmentof the People’s Republic of China made multiple, serious mistakes in the early stages of the COVID–19 outbreak that heightened the severity and spread of the ongoing COVID–19 pandemic.”
The text said those mistakes:
…include the Chinese Government’s intentional spread of misinformation to downplay the risks of the virus, a refusal to cooperate with international health authorities, internal censorship of doctors and journalists, and malicious disregard for the health of ethnic minorities.
Banks, a U.S. Navy reservist, said in a statement:
As the Chinese Communist Party pushes propaganda and lies to try and blame the United States for coronavirus, we need to make the case to the world that China is ultimately responsible for this outbreak. They tried to cover-up news of the virus, jailed doctors warning of a possible pandemic, and prevented the CDC from coming to study the disease. In all, they cost the globe two months in time to prepare for this virus. I hope this begins a conversation about how China can be held accountable for their negligent coronavirus response.
Moulton, a Marine veteran, said in a statement:
The Chinese Communist Party’s leaders responded to the coronavirus outbreak first with disinformation and misdirection. China’s leaders kicked out American journalists who were covering the virus’ spread and the lives it claimed. China’s leaders silenced doctors, some of whom died sounding the alarm to the world. And while the clock was ticking, China’s leaders were focused on spreading propaganda that said the American military caused the virus, downplaying its severity.
He continued, criticizing Trump, but said, “The American people should hold our leaders accountable, and their representatives should hold China accountable for its part in this pandemic.”
GOP Reps. Kevin Hern (OK), Austin Scott (GA), Trent Kelly (MS), Brian Babin (TX), Barry Loudermilk (GA), Adam Kinzinger (IL), Greg Steube (FL), Larry Bucshon (IN), Mike Rogers (AL), Dan Crenshaw (TX), Mike Gallagher (WI), Kelly Armstrong (ND), Guy Reschenthaler (PA), Michael Waltz (FL), and Jason Smith (MO), Anthony Gonzalez (OH), Denver Riggleman (VA), Jim Hagerdorn (MN), Ralph Norman (SC), Rick Crawford (AR), Bill Johnson (OH), Elise Stefanik (NY), Randy Weber (TX) have co-sponsored the bill.
FEINSTEIN
HAS SPENT HER POLITICAL LIFE STALKING THE HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS
THAT PUT HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS IN HER POCKETS.
SHE HAS
AVOIDED PROSECUTION BY VOTING AGAINST ANY ETHICS BILLS AND HER HUSBAND, RICHARD
BLUM'S HANDING OUT "CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION" BRIBES TO EVERY DEMOCRAT
OUT THERE!
IN THE
November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform. And
so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior
of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own
ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics experts.
“All in all, it was an
incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red
China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
“Our
entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become
a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This is the
way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan
Senator
Who Employed Chinese Spy Endorses Joe Biden for President…don’t you wonder
why???
A high-profile U.S. senator (DIANNE FEINSTEIN) with professional and
personal ties to China — including once employing one of its spies — is backing
former Vice President Joe Biden amid mounting questions over his son’s business
dealings with the communist regime.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), a
former chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, announced her
endorsement of the former vice president on Tuesday, claiming to have
witnessed Biden’s “fortitude” and leadership during their overlapping tenures
in Congress.
Feinstein said in a statement:
I’ve worked closely with Vice
President Biden and I’ve seen firsthand his legislative ability, his
statesmanship, and most importantly his moral fortitud. During his time in
Congress and in the White House, Joe Biden has been a tireless fighter for hard
working American families.
The endorsement comes as Biden’s
presidential campaign is besieged by scandal regarding the lucrative business
dealings his youngest son, Hunter, had with foreign governments.
Only hours before Feinstein’s
endorsement, the Chinese government announced it would not
investigate how Hunter Biden ended up at the center of one its top private
equity firms. The Chinese foreign ministry made the decision after President
Donald Trump publicly called for a probe of Hunter Biden’s dealings with Bohai Harvest
RST (BHR). In particular, Trump has noted that the circumstances surrounding
BHR’s creation could have posed a conflict of interest for Joe Biden.
As Peter Schweizer, senior
contributor at Breitbart News, revealed in his bestselling book Secret Empires: How the American Political
Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends, Hunter
Biden inked the multibillion-dollar deal that created BHR with a subsidiary of
the state-owned Bank of China in 2013.
The timing of the lucrative deal has
been brought into question as it came only 12 days after Hunter visited China
with his father aboard Air Force Two. Officially, the then-vice president
was visiting the country amid escalating tensions over islands in the South
China Sea and decided to bring his granddaughter and son along. In a March
2018 interview with Breitbart News Tonight ,
however, Schweizer detailed the political machinations that preceded Hunter
Biden’s $1.5 billion venture with China:
In December of 2013, Vice President
Joe Biden flies to Asia for a trip, and the centerpiece for that trip is a
visit to Beijing, China. To put this into context, in 2013, the Chinese have
just exerted air rights over the South Pacific, the South China Sea. They
basically have said, ‘If you want to fly in this area, you have to get Chinese
approval. We are claiming sovereignty over this territory.’ Highly
controversial in Japan, in the Philippines, and in other countries. Joe Biden
is supposed to be going there to confront the Chinese. Well, he gets widely
criticized on that trip for going soft on China. For basically not challenging
them, and Japan and other countries are quite upset about this.
Since its creation, BHR has invested
heavily in energy and defense projects across the globe. As of
June, Hunter Biden was still involved with BHR,
sitting on its board of directors and owning a minority stake of the fund
estimated to be worth more than $430,000.
Such dealings at the center of
politics and business, while perhaps not illegal, are not exclusive to the
Biden family alone. As a few noted at the time of Feinstein’s endorsement, the
senator and her husband have their own close ties to the communist country.
During her tenure as mayor of San
Francisco in the late-1970s and early-1980s, Feinstein took advantage of the
newly normalized diplomatic relations between the U.S. and China by
establishing one of the first sister city partnership between San Francisco and
Shanghai. Through that partnership, Feinstein led trade delegations to China in
which she and her husband, Richard Blum, became acquainted with some of the
country’s most prominent political leaders.
As the Federalist noted in August 2018, Feinstein
and her husband leveraged those relationships to boost their own wealth. In
1986, Feinstein and Jiang Zemin — the then-mayor of Shanghai, who would later
ascend to the presidency of the People’s Republic of China — “designated
several corporate entities for fostering commercial relations.” One of those
firms was Shanghai Pacific Partners, which employed Blum as a director. Blum
reportedly had an interest of upwards of $500,000 in a project backed by
Shanghai Pacific Partners.
After Feinstein was elected to the
Senate in 1992, Blum continued profiting off their ties to China. A the same
time, the freshman lawmaker was pitching herself as a “China hand” to
colleagues, even once claiming “that in my
last life maybe I was Chinese.” Through her seat on the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, Feinstein led the fight on a number of initiatives seen as
being favorable to China, including granting the country permanent
most-favored-nation trading status in 2000.
Despite Feinstein and her husband
having a close relationship with Jiang, the Chinese government targeted the senator
as part of its espionage operations. In the early 2000s, the Chinese Ministry
of State Security (MSS) recruited a longtime employee of the senator to gather
information about the inner workings of her congressional and district offices.
Feinstein only learned of the staffer’s duplicity in 2013, after he’d already
been on her payroll for more than 20 years.
“While this person, who was a liaison
to the local Chinese community, was fired, charges were never filed against
him,” Politico reported in 2018,
speculating that because “the staffer was providing political intelligence and
not classified information—making prosecution far more difficult.”
Apart from the convoluted history of
the senator’s ties to China, the political timing of Feinstein’s endorsement
also caught many off guard. The California Democrat, who hosted a
fundraiser on Biden’s behalf last week alongside House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) daughter, is only the most recent figure from the
Democrat establishment to openly pledge support for the former vice president.
Feinstein’s endorsement, however, was not totally expected, especially since
her seamate, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA), is mounting a bid of her own for the
Democrat nomination. In fact, earlier this year, Feinsten flirted with the
notion of remaining neutral in the 2020 contest out of respect for Harris.
Compounding the political picture is
that most polls show Biden no longer the favorite to win California,
having fallen behind Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).
Feinstein, however, did not address
any of that when endorsing the former vice president on Tuesday. Instead, the
senator offered platitudes about Biden’s work to enhance gun control and how
his campaign was a “fight to restore the soul of the nation.”
HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating strategic technology transfer in return for money
is an old Clinton game. The Chinese bought their way to access of
considerable space technology when Bill Clinton was president. Remember
Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND
RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING
TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
Chinese
Ambassador Lauds Hillary Clinton’s Attack on President Trump: ‘Justice Always
Speak Loudly’
An ambassador from China is lauding Hillary Clinton’s recent
attack on President Trump.
“The president is turning to racist rhetoric to distract from
his failures to take the coronavirus seriously early on, make tests widely
available, and adequately prepare the country for a period of crisis,” Clinton
wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.
“Don’t fall for it. Don’t let your friends and family fall for
it.”
That prompted a response from a representative of the communist
regime, the Chinese ambassador to South Africa, Lin Songtian.
He shared a tweet from China News Service, a regime-owned
agency:
The attached article listed
several Americans, namely Clinton and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), criticizing Trump
for blaming China.
“It is true,” Lin wrote regarding Clinton’s attack that Trump
calling coronavirus a “Chinese virus” is “racist rhetoric.”
“Justice always speak [sic] loudly.”
Clinton has repeatedly taken potshots at Trump during the
coronavirus crisis.
“Hospitals are already running out of ventilators and beds. Nurses
are using bandanas as masks,” she typed on Thursday.
Arming China -- The Bill Clinton
Connection
We even
sold them our factories.
March 19, 2020
Michael
Ledeen
Conversations on social media are beginning
to stress the urgency of reconsidering our relationship with the People’s
Republic of China. It was only recently that most Americans discovered that
most of our pharmaceuticals are manufactured in China, and that the Chinese are
in a position to withhold them during an emergency of the sort we now face.
Recent stories have documented Chinese
espionage, including the bribery of top American biochemists at places like
Harvard, that entailed the constant travel of U.S. experts between China and
the United States. Given the short memories of American political leaders,
these stories have made it appear as though espionage is of very recent
vintage.
But it is not so. The United States has
been arming China for more than 20 years.
In the Spring of 1997, Stephen Bryen and I
wrote a detailed account in Heterodoxy , a magazine edited by David
Horowitz and Peter Collier, dealing with American export controls of militarily
useful technology. It was entered into the Congressional Record by
Tillie Fowler, a Florida representative.
The theme of the account was how the
Clinton Administration was arming China. Knowingly and deliberately.
It is often said that, in the world of
advanced technology, embargoes or export controls cannot possibly work, because
if they don't get it from us, they'll get it from somebody else.
This is false. To compete with the U.S.
militarily, China has to get our technology, and, most of the time, that means
getting it directly from us.
Steve and I knew that Bill Clinton and his
foreign policy team were busily arming Beijing, which in turn armed “rogue
nations” such as Iran, Iraq, Syria and Libya. Remember this all happened about
25 years ago. We noted that, on the one hand, it did make sense to sell a very
limited amount of advanced military technology to the Communist Chinese, for
example devices for nuclear safety, or for certain military systems with
important civilian applications, such as satellite launchers. But the Clinton
Administration was not doing that. Instead, it was executing a
deliberate policy—apparently one that had full approval from the top levels of
the Administration, despite the vigorous opposition from government agencies
and from individual officials infuriated at the flow of top technology to
China. This often took the form of selling off some of our finest factories to
China, at pennies on the dollar, and included our finest supercomputers and the
key element to modern jet engines, which had been blocked for export to the
Soviet bloc.
The Pentagon redefined supercomputers as
“civilian” products, and some 46 of them, including IBM, Convex (later, Hewlett
Packard) and Silicon Graphics, were sold, many of them to the Chinese defense
industry, or being put to use in nuclear weapons design.
This represents a truly terrifying
hemorrhage, for supercomputers are the central nervous system of modern
warfare. The sales of 46 supercomputers give the Chinese more of these crucial
devices than are in use in the Pentagon, the military services, and the
intelligence community…
They enable the Chinese to more rapidly
design state-of-the-art weapons, add stealth capability to their missiles and
aircraft, improve their anti-submarine warfare technology, and dramatically
enhance their ability to design and build smaller nuclear weapons suitable for
cruise missiles. Thanks to the folly of the Clinton Administration, the Chinese
can now conduct tests of nuclear weapons, conventional explosives, and chemical
and biological weapons on supercomputers.
That was the first wave. In the years
since, we have bent over backwards to enable the Chinese to strengthen
themselves, and it wasn’t until President Trump shut down air travel to and
from the PRC in early 2020—in response to the global virus pandemic, not in the
name of national security—that we began to get a grip on the massive influx of
Chinese spies. But it’s important to remember that it all began with an
American decision to arm China.
There are those who say that we had to
strengthen China to act as a bulwark against Russia, but I don’t buy that. The
big shift to Chinese manufacture came because they could make things far more
cheaply than others could. That’s the profit motive, not national security.
Photo: Gage Skidmore
Stunning! Hillary Clinton thanked by Chinese diplomat for
criticizing Trump as racist over ‘Chinese flu’ label
Hillary
Clinton has chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese propaganda
effort to evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on the world
that an ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on Twitter in
the name of “justice.”
Perhaps
in the twisted worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to
side with the progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly
plans to displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s
hegemon.
Here
is the tweet spotted by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As
American Thinker readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is
well established, and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When
was "German measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many
progressive politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then
known, the “Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to
denying its culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US
soldiers had seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China
has been behaving like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of
pharmaceuticals (and thereby kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a
time of crisis has never before been a winning strategy, except when one’s
homeland is defeated, at which point one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps
the former Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by
the dominant media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There
will be a reckoning.
Hillary
Clinton has chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese
propaganda effort to evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on
the world that an ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on
Twitter in the name of “justice.”
Perhaps
in the twisted worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to
side with the progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly
plans to displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s
hegemon.
Here
is the tweet spotted by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As
American Thinker readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is
well established, and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When
was "German measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many
progressive politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then
known, the “Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to
denying its culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US
soldiers had seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China
has been behaving like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of
pharmaceuticals (and thereby kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a
time of crisis has never before been a winning strategy, except when one’s
homeland is defeated, at which point one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps
the former Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by
the dominant media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There
will be a reckoning.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic
party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not
a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL
BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone
virtually unreported by Corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the
Clintons’
longstanding support for
“open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed
in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open
borders frequently comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy
foreign audiences and donors.
The Rebirth of Our Nation and the End of Globalism
For
the last few decades, we have watched the left's advancement of globalism,
multiculturalism, and a world with no borders, to the detriment of our
nation-state. Nationalism was viewed with disdain by the media elite
and their counterparts in academia as an outdated paradigm to be relegated to
the dustbin of history.
In
their effort to advance their mission, they created NAFTA, and under Bill
Clinton, free trade with China was initiated in 2000. China was
officially welcomed into the World Trade Organization in 2001 with promises to
reform tariffs and policies, tariff reductions, and open
markets. China also received Most Favored Nations Status. Its
admittance significantly resulted in it receiving the lowest tariffs, fewer
trade barriers, and the highest import quotas.
Many
of America's once thriving manufacturing companies moved their operations
overseas, where cheap labor and fewer stifling regulations promised hefty
profits and less governmental interference. As a result, millions
lost their jobs in cities throughout the United States. The Rust
Belt, once the manufacturing heartland of America in states such as Michigan,
Wisconsin, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, experienced urban decay
and losses in population due to deindustrialization. Our
leading auto manufacturers, steel suppliers, pharmaceuticals, and clothing
manufacturers suddenly became a thing of the past. Cities like
Detroit lost their base, as did Cleveland, a large supplier of
steel. Currently, the Chinese produce 50% of the world's
steel. American aluminum manufacturers during the '50s and '60s
provided 80% of the world's supply, but by 2014, it had dwindled to 32%. We
used to be a sizable supplier of rare earth minerals, but today, 80% of rare
earth minerals critically needed in the production of cell phones, missile
systems, hybrid cell batteries, and solar panels is mined in
China. Additionally, 80% of our pharmaceuticals are now manufactured
in Communist China. As China employed unfair trade deals that
imposed huge tariffs upon our goods, it became clear that we were losing our
economic edge and taking a backseat to a rising tyrannical world
power.
Under
the watch of Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Hussein Obama, the
outsourcing to China continued unabated. There were conservatives
within the GOP, particularly the Freedom Caucus, who objected, but they were
quickly overruled by the establishment Republican old-guard globalists such as
the late John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, and Paul
Ryan. Obama's philosophy was to "lead from behind," and
behind we fell. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that if
one is behind, one is not in the lead, but Obama sold that unbelievable
illogical slogan to millions of gullible empty heads. For eight long
years under Obama, our GDP never grew beyond 2%, and he shamelessly warned that
without a magic wand, manufacturing jobs were never going to come back . While cities
throughout Asia and the Middle East were building new skyscrapers, our
infrastructure was falling apart. Highways, bridges, and city
streets were old and in need of repair. Many urban areas such as
Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, and Los Angeles were rotting from within.
The
entrance of President Trump, known for the art of the deal, into the
Presidential campaign four years ago was met with ridicule and scorn by the
elites in the media. For years, he had watched the decline of the
United States from a distance. His decision to enter the race should
not have been surprising. He hinted as far back as 1988 that he would consider a presidential run if needed.
With
America on the decline, new, bold leadership was indeed
needed. Ultimately, it would take an outsider with financial
independent means, not beholden to a corrupt oligarchy or the many various
lobbying groups in operation, to reverse course. He entered the race
with a mission to restore America's stature by making America great
again. At odds with the elite globalists who had dominated D.C. for
many years, he quickly became their target since the restoration of America's
greatness required an end to the reign of corruption that governed much of
D.C. His election to office marked the beginning of the end of their
sweetheart deals made on the side while lining their pockets in return for
either looking the other way or by literally selling out our country.
With
the aid of the politicization of the FBI, the CIA, and our Justice Department
under Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrats along with their Deep State
counterparts invented a Russian collusion hoax; the Mueller report, which found
no grounds for indictment; and the Ukrainian quid pro quo charge — and with
less than a year left in his administration, they moved to
impeach. They failed miserably! The economy was booming
with low unemployment and a soaring stock market. The re-election of
President Trump was promising and looked imminent, but it came to a screeching
halt when the Chinese either intentionally or negligently unleashed the Wuhan
virus upon the world in December of last year. Instead of focusing
their energy upon a menacing totalitarian communist state on the world stage,
House Democrats obsessed with Trump Derangement Syndrome, along with their
sidekicks in the complicit mainstream media, spent all of December and January
razor-focused upon a bogus impeachment trial.
The
use of biological warfare is illegal and criminal. When threatened
with exposure, China retaliated with the threat of withholding much needed
pharmaceuticals now needed more than ever.
The
promise of globalization and the end of borders as advanced by leftists, who
like to label themselves as Progressives, is now in
question. Political pundits who for years advanced policies that led
to our dependency for goods that we once manufactured now have the gall to
blame the president when it was their policies that led to the rise of China
and our dependency.
Totalitarian
communist states can never be trusted. Their word is no good, and
their signatures upon treaties are as worthless as their word.
Consequently,
President Trump is now a wartime president. He has amassed the best
and the brightest among us in today's battle. The future is an
unknown, but if he succeeds at winning the next round, and I believe he will,
our economy will bounce back stronger than ever. If the past three
years under President Trump are any indication, we will survive and thrive once
again under his leadership. The Chinese and his Democrat nemesis may
rue the day they construed his demise. Against all odds, his finest
hour may by upon us as President Trump rallies our country against an enemy
unleashed by a tyrannical regime. In so doing, history will regard
him as the president who saved American exceptionalism during a time of
hardship and war. It is he who will be credited with the rebirth of
our nation, while globalism will be relegated to the dustbin of history, where
it belongs.
Shari Goodman is a political activist,
writer, public speaker, and optimist. She has written for Israel
Today, WND, American Thinker, and other publications.
No comments:
Post a Comment