HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating strategic technology transfer in return for money
is an old Clinton game. The Chinese bought their way to access of
considerable space technology when Bill Clinton was president. Remember
Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND
RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING
TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
Chinese
Ambassador Lauds Hillary Clinton’s Attack on President Trump: ‘Justice Always
Speak Loudly’
An
ambassador from China is lauding Hillary Clinton’s recent attack on President
Trump.
“The president is turning to racist rhetoric to distract from
his failures to take the coronavirus seriously early on, make tests widely
available, and adequately prepare the country for a period of crisis,” Clinton
wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.
“Don’t fall for it. Don’t let your friends and family fall for
it.”
The president is turning to racist rhetoric
to distract from his failures to take the coronavirus seriously early on, make
tests widely available, and adequately prepare the country for a period of
crisis.
Don't fall for it. Don't let your friends and family fall for it.
Don't fall for it. Don't let your friends and family fall for it.
That prompted a response from a representative of the communist
regime, the Chinese ambassador to South Africa, Lin Songtian.
He shared a tweet from China News Service, a regime-owned
agency:
It is true. Justice always speak loudly. https://twitter.com/Echinanews/status/1240941153479876609 …
The
attached article listed several
Americans, namely Clinton and Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA), criticizing Trump for
blaming China.
“It is true,” Lin wrote regarding Clinton’s attack that Trump
calling coronavirus a “Chinese virus” is “racist rhetoric.”
“Justice always speak [sic] loudly.”
Clinton has repeatedly taken potshots at Trump during the
coronavirus crisis.
“Hospitals are already running out of ventilators and beds.
Nurses are using bandanas as masks,” she typed on Thursday.
Arming China -- The Bill Clinton
Connection
We even
sold them our factories.
March 19, 2020
Michael
Ledeen
Conversations on social media are beginning to stress the urgency
of reconsidering our relationship with the People’s Republic of China. It was
only recently that most Americans discovered that most of our pharmaceuticals
are manufactured in China, and that the Chinese are in a position to withhold
them during an emergency of the sort we now face.
Recent stories have documented Chinese espionage, including the
bribery of top American biochemists at places like Harvard, that entailed the
constant travel of U.S. experts between China and the United States. Given the
short memories of American political leaders, these stories have made it appear
as though espionage is of very recent vintage.
But it is not so. The United States has been arming China for more
than 20 years.
In the Spring of 1997, Stephen Bryen and I wrote a detailed
account in Heterodoxy, a magazine edited by David Horowitz and
Peter Collier, dealing with American export controls of militarily useful
technology. It was entered into the Congressional Record by
Tillie Fowler, a Florida representative.
The theme of the account was how the Clinton Administration was
arming China. Knowingly and deliberately.
It is often said that, in the world of advanced technology,
embargoes or export controls cannot possibly work, because if they don't get it
from us, they'll get it from somebody else.
This is false. To compete with the U.S. militarily, China has to
get our technology, and, most of the time, that means getting it directly from
us.
Steve and I knew that Bill Clinton and his foreign policy team
were busily arming Beijing, which in turn armed “rogue nations” such as Iran,
Iraq, Syria and Libya. Remember this all happened about 25 years ago. We noted
that, on the one hand, it did make sense to sell a very limited amount of
advanced military technology to the Communist Chinese, for example devices for
nuclear safety, or for certain military systems with important civilian
applications, such as satellite launchers. But the Clinton Administration was
not doing that. Instead, it was executing a deliberate
policy—apparently one that had full approval from the top levels of the
Administration, despite the vigorous opposition from government agencies and
from individual officials infuriated at the flow of top technology to China.
This often took the form of selling off some of our finest factories to China,
at pennies on the dollar, and included our finest supercomputers and the key
element to modern jet engines, which had been blocked for export to the Soviet
bloc.
The Pentagon redefined supercomputers as “civilian” products, and
some 46 of them, including IBM, Convex (later, Hewlett Packard) and Silicon
Graphics, were sold, many of them to the Chinese defense industry, or being put
to use in nuclear weapons design.
This represents a truly terrifying hemorrhage, for supercomputers
are the central nervous system of modern warfare. The sales of 46
supercomputers give the Chinese more of these crucial devices than are in use
in the Pentagon, the military services, and the intelligence community…
They enable the Chinese to more rapidly design state-of-the-art
weapons, add stealth capability to their missiles and aircraft, improve their
anti-submarine warfare technology, and dramatically enhance their ability to
design and build smaller nuclear weapons suitable for cruise missiles. Thanks
to the folly of the Clinton Administration, the Chinese can now conduct tests
of nuclear weapons, conventional explosives, and chemical and biological
weapons on supercomputers.
That was the first wave. In the years since, we have bent over
backwards to enable the Chinese to strengthen themselves, and it wasn’t until
President Trump shut down air travel to and from the PRC in early 2020—in
response to the global virus pandemic, not in the name of national security—that
we began to get a grip on the massive influx of Chinese spies. But it’s
important to remember that it all began with an American decision to arm China.
There are those who say that we had to strengthen China to act as
a bulwark against Russia, but I don’t buy that. The big shift to Chinese
manufacture came because they could make things far more cheaply than others
could. That’s the profit motive, not national security.
Photo: Gage Skidmore
Stunning! Hillary Clinton
thanked by Chinese diplomat for criticizing Trump as racist over ‘Chinese flu’
label
Hillary Clinton has
chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese propaganda effort to
evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on the world that an
ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on Twitter in the name
of “justice.”
Perhaps in the twisted
worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to side with the
progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly plans to
displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s hegemon.
Here is the tweet spotted
by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As American Thinker
readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is well established,
and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When was "German
measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many progressive
politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then known, the
“Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to denying its
culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US soldiers had
seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China has been behaving
like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of pharmaceuticals (and thereby
kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a time of crisis has never before
been a winning strategy, except when one’s homeland is defeated, at which point
one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps the former
Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by the dominant
media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There will be a
reckoning.
Hillary Clinton has
chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese propaganda effort to
evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on the world that an
ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on Twitter in the name
of “justice.”
Perhaps in the twisted
worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to side with the
progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly plans to
displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s hegemon.
Here is the tweet spotted
by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As American Thinker
readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is well established,
and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When was "German
measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many progressive
politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then known, the
“Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to denying its
culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US soldiers had
seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China has been behaving
like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of pharmaceuticals (and thereby
kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a time of crisis has never before
been a winning strategy, except when one’s homeland is defeated, at which point
one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps the former
Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by the dominant
media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There will be a
reckoning.
No comments:
Post a Comment