Even though it has gone virtually unreported by
corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively
documented the Clintons’ longstanding support
for “open borders.” Interestingly,
as the Los Angeles Times observed in 2007, the
Clinton’s praise for globalization and open borders
frequently comes when they are speaking before a
wealthy foreign audiences and donors.
The Rebirth of Our Nation and the End of Globalism
For the last few decades, we have watched the left's advancement of globalism, multiculturalism, and a world with no borders, to the detriment of our nation-state. Nationalism was viewed with disdain by the media elite and their counterparts in academia as an outdated paradigm to be relegated to the dustbin of history.
In their effort to advance their mission, they created NAFTA, and under Bill Clinton, free trade with China was initiated in 2000. China was officially welcomed into the World Trade Organization in 2001 with promises to reform tariffs and policies, tariff reductions, and open markets. China also received Most Favored Nations Status. Its admittance significantly resulted in it receiving the lowest tariffs, fewer trade barriers, and the highest import quotas.
Many of America's once thriving manufacturing companies moved their operations overseas, where cheap labor and fewer stifling regulations promised hefty profits and less governmental interference. As a result, millions lost their jobs in cities throughout the United States. The Rust Belt, once the manufacturing heartland of America in states such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, experienced urban decay and losses in population due to deindustrialization. Our leading auto manufacturers, steel suppliers, pharmaceuticals, and clothing manufacturers suddenly became a thing of the past. Cities like Detroit lost their base, as did Cleveland, a large supplier of steel. Currently, the Chinese produce 50% of the world's steel. American aluminum manufacturers during the '50s and '60s provided 80% of the world's supply, but by 2014, it had dwindled to 32%. We used to be a sizable supplier of rare earth minerals, but today, 80% of rare earth minerals critically needed in the production of cell phones, missile systems, hybrid cell batteries, and solar panels is mined in China. Additionally, 80% of our pharmaceuticals are now manufactured in Communist China. As China employed unfair trade deals that imposed huge tariffs upon our goods, it became clear that we were losing our economic edge and taking a backseat to a rising tyrannical world power.
Under the watch of Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Barack Hussein Obama, the outsourcing to China continued unabated. There were conservatives within the GOP, particularly the Freedom Caucus, who objected, but they were quickly overruled by the establishment Republican old-guard globalists such as the late John McCain, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, and Paul Ryan. Obama's philosophy was to "lead from behind," and behind we fell. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that if one is behind, one is not in the lead, but Obama sold that unbelievable illogical slogan to millions of gullible empty heads. For eight long years under Obama, our GDP never grew beyond 2%, and he shamelessly warned that without a magic wand, manufacturing jobs were never going to come back. While cities throughout Asia and the Middle East were building new skyscrapers, our infrastructure was falling apart. Highways, bridges, and city streets were old and in need of repair. Many urban areas such as Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, and Los Angeles were rotting from within.
The entrance of President Trump, known for the art of the deal, into the Presidential campaign four years ago was met with ridicule and scorn by the elites in the media. For years, he had watched the decline of the United States from a distance. His decision to enter the race should not have been surprising. He hinted as far back as 1988 that he would consider a presidential run if needed.
With America on the decline, new, bold leadership was indeed needed. Ultimately, it would take an outsider with financial independent means, not beholden to a corrupt oligarchy or the many various lobbying groups in operation, to reverse course. He entered the race with a mission to restore America's stature by making America great again. At odds with the elite globalists who had dominated D.C. for many years, he quickly became their target since the restoration of America's greatness required an end to the reign of corruption that governed much of D.C. His election to office marked the beginning of the end of their sweetheart deals made on the side while lining their pockets in return for either looking the other way or by literally selling out our country.
With the aid of the politicization of the FBI, the CIA, and our Justice Department under Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrats along with their Deep State counterparts invented a Russian collusion hoax; the Mueller report, which found no grounds for indictment; and the Ukrainian quid pro quo charge — and with less than a year left in his administration, they moved to impeach. They failed miserably! The economy was booming with low unemployment and a soaring stock market. The re-election of President Trump was promising and looked imminent, but it came to a screeching halt when the Chinese either intentionally or negligently unleashed the Wuhan virus upon the world in December of last year. Instead of focusing their energy upon a menacing totalitarian communist state on the world stage, House Democrats obsessed with Trump Derangement Syndrome, along with their sidekicks in the complicit mainstream media, spent all of December and January razor-focused upon a bogus impeachment trial.
The use of biological warfare is illegal and criminal. When threatened with exposure, China retaliated with the threat of withholding much needed pharmaceuticals now needed more than ever.
The promise of globalization and the end of borders as advanced by leftists, who like to label themselves as Progressives, is now in question. Political pundits who for years advanced policies that led to our dependency for goods that we once manufactured now have the gall to blame the president when it was their policies that led to the rise of China and our dependency.
Totalitarian communist states can never be trusted. Their word is no good, and their signatures upon treaties are as worthless as their word.
Consequently, President Trump is now a wartime president. He has amassed the best and the brightest among us in today's battle. The future is an unknown, but if he succeeds at winning the next round, and I believe he will, our economy will bounce back stronger than ever. If the past three years under President Trump are any indication, we will survive and thrive once again under his leadership. The Chinese and his Democrat nemesis may rue the day they construed his demise. Against all odds, his finest hour may by upon us as President Trump rallies our country against an enemy unleashed by a tyrannical regime. In so doing, history will regard him as the president who saved American exceptionalism during a time of hardship and war. It is he who will be credited with the rebirth of our nation, while globalism will be relegated to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.
Shari Goodman is a political activist, writer, public speaker, and optimist. She has written for Israel Today, WND, American Thinker, and other publications.
Chinese
Ambassador Lauds Hillary Clinton’s Attack on President Trump: ‘Justice Always
Speak Loudly’
KYLE OLSON
Stunning! Hillary Clinton thanked by Chinese diplomat for criticizing
Trump as racist over ‘Chinese flu’ label
THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly
dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating strategic technology transfer in return for money
is an old Clinton game. The Chinese bought their way to access of
considerable space technology when Bill Clinton was president. Remember
Charlie Trie, Loral, and the rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND
RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING
TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
Chinese
Ambassador Lauds Hillary Clinton’s Attack on President Trump: ‘Justice Always
Speak Loudly’
KYLE OLSON
An ambassador from China is lauding Hillary Clinton’s recent
attack on President Trump.
“The president is turning to racist rhetoric to distract from
his failures to take the coronavirus seriously early on, make tests widely
available, and adequately prepare the country for a period of crisis,” Clinton
wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.
“Don’t fall for it. Don’t let your friends and family fall for
it.”
The president is turning to racist rhetoric to distract from his failures
to take the coronavirus seriously early on, make tests widely available, and
adequately prepare the country for a period of crisis.
Don't fall for it. Don't let your friends and family fall for it.
Don't fall for it. Don't let your friends and family fall for it.
That prompted a response from a representative of the communist
regime, the Chinese ambassador to South Africa, Lin Songtian.
He shared a tweet from China News Service, a regime-owned
agency:
It is true. Justice always speak loudly. https://twitter.com/Echinanews/status/1240941153479876609 …
The attached article listed several Americans, namely Clinton and Rep. Ted Lieu
(D-CA), criticizing Trump for blaming China.
“It is true,” Lin wrote regarding Clinton’s attack that Trump
calling coronavirus a “Chinese virus” is “racist rhetoric.”
“Justice always speak [sic] loudly.”
Clinton has repeatedly taken potshots at Trump during the
coronavirus crisis.
“Hospitals are already running out of ventilators and beds.
Nurses are using bandanas as masks,” she typed on Thursday.
Arming China -- The Bill Clinton
Connection
We even
sold them our factories.
March 19, 2020
Michael
Ledeen
Conversations on social media are beginning
to stress the urgency of reconsidering our relationship with the People’s
Republic of China. It was only recently that most Americans discovered that
most of our pharmaceuticals are manufactured in China, and that the Chinese are
in a position to withhold them during an emergency of the sort we now face.
Recent stories have documented Chinese
espionage, including the bribery of top American biochemists at places like
Harvard, that entailed the constant travel of U.S. experts between China and
the United States. Given the short memories of American political leaders,
these stories have made it appear as though espionage is of very recent
vintage.
But it is not so. The United States has
been arming China for more than 20 years.
In the Spring of 1997, Stephen Bryen and I
wrote a detailed account in Heterodoxy, a magazine edited by David
Horowitz and Peter Collier, dealing with American export controls of militarily
useful technology. It was entered into the Congressional Record by
Tillie Fowler, a Florida representative.
The theme of the account was how the
Clinton Administration was arming China. Knowingly and deliberately.
It is often said that, in the world of
advanced technology, embargoes or export controls cannot possibly work, because
if they don't get it from us, they'll get it from somebody else.
This is false. To compete with the U.S.
militarily, China has to get our technology, and, most of the time, that means
getting it directly from us.
Steve and I knew that Bill Clinton and his
foreign policy team were busily arming Beijing, which in turn armed “rogue
nations” such as Iran, Iraq, Syria and Libya. Remember this all happened about
25 years ago. We noted that, on the one hand, it did make sense to sell a very
limited amount of advanced military technology to the Communist Chinese, for
example devices for nuclear safety, or for certain military systems with
important civilian applications, such as satellite launchers. But the Clinton
Administration was not doing that. Instead, it was executing a
deliberate policy—apparently one that had full approval from the top levels of
the Administration, despite the vigorous opposition from government agencies
and from individual officials infuriated at the flow of top technology to
China. This often took the form of selling off some of our finest factories to
China, at pennies on the dollar, and included our finest supercomputers and the
key element to modern jet engines, which had been blocked for export to the
Soviet bloc.
The Pentagon redefined supercomputers as
“civilian” products, and some 46 of them, including IBM, Convex (later, Hewlett
Packard) and Silicon Graphics, were sold, many of them to the Chinese defense
industry, or being put to use in nuclear weapons design.
This represents a truly terrifying
hemorrhage, for supercomputers are the central nervous system of modern
warfare. The sales of 46 supercomputers give the Chinese more of these crucial
devices than are in use in the Pentagon, the military services, and the
intelligence community…
They enable the Chinese to more rapidly
design state-of-the-art weapons, add stealth capability to their missiles and
aircraft, improve their anti-submarine warfare technology, and dramatically
enhance their ability to design and build smaller nuclear weapons suitable for
cruise missiles. Thanks to the folly of the Clinton Administration, the Chinese
can now conduct tests of nuclear weapons, conventional explosives, and chemical
and biological weapons on supercomputers.
That was the first wave. In the years
since, we have bent over backwards to enable the Chinese to strengthen
themselves, and it wasn’t until President Trump shut down air travel to and
from the PRC in early 2020—in response to the global virus pandemic, not in the
name of national security—that we began to get a grip on the massive influx of
Chinese spies. But it’s important to remember that it all began with an
American decision to arm China.
There are those who say that we had to
strengthen China to act as a bulwark against Russia, but I don’t buy that. The
big shift to Chinese manufacture came because they could make things far more
cheaply than others could. That’s the profit motive, not national security.
Photo: Gage Skidmore
Stunning! Hillary Clinton thanked by Chinese diplomat for criticizing
Trump as racist over ‘Chinese flu’ label
Hillary
Clinton has chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese
propaganda effort to evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on
the world that an ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on
Twitter in the name of “justice.”
Perhaps
in the twisted worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to
side with the progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly
plans to displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s
hegemon.
Here
is the tweet spotted by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As
American Thinker readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is
well established, and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When
was "German measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many
progressive politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then
known, the “Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to
denying its culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US
soldiers had seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China
has been behaving like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of
pharmaceuticals (and thereby kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a
time of crisis has never before been a winning strategy, except when one’s
homeland is defeated, at which point one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps
the former Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by
the dominant media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There
will be a reckoning.
Hillary
Clinton has chosen sides, and she is so firmly enlisted in the Chinese
propaganda effort to evade responsibility for foisting the COVID-19 virus on
the world that an ambassador from that country has publicly endorsed her on
Twitter in the name of “justice.”
Perhaps
in the twisted worldview of pathological Trump hatred, it is a good thing to
side with the progenitor of a plague upon the world, the country that openly
plans to displace the United States and establish itself as the world’s
hegemon.
Here
is the tweet spotted by Rep. Paul Gosar:
As
American Thinker readers know, identifying a virus by its place of origin is
well established, and has never before been regarded as “racist.” When
was "German measles" w=ever denounced as a racist name? Many
progressive politicians and media figures called Coronavirus, as it was then
known, the “Wuhan virus” early on. When China’s strategy turned to
denying its culpability and some propaganda organs absurdly claimed that US
soldiers had seeded the virus in China, the claims of racism started appearing.
China
has been behaving like an enemy, threatening to cut off supplies of
pharmaceuticals (and thereby kill Amercans). Siding with an enemy in a
time of crisis has never before been a winning strategy, except when one’s
homeland is defeated, at which point one becomes a Quisling.
Perhaps
the former Secretary of State was misled into thinking this was a wise move by
the dominant media efforts in support of China’s propaganda line.
There
will be a reckoning.
THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly
dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic
party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not
a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:
SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL
BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION
Even though it has gone
virtually unreported by
corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the
Clintons’ longstanding support for “open borders.” Interestingly,
as the Los Angeles Times observed
in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for
globalization and open
borders frequently comes when they are
speaking before a wealthy
foreign audiences and donors.
No comments:
Post a Comment