THEY STARTED TWO WARS TO PROTECT THEIR SAUDIS
PAYMASTERS (WHO DO YOU THINK FUNDED THE BUSH PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY?) AND HAVE
SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS AND HOMELAND SECURITY FOR ENDLESS HORDES OF ‘CHEAP’
LABOR.
House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret
Relationship between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties
Audible Audiobook – Abridged
How did the Bushes, America's most powerful political
family, become gradually seduced by and entangled with their Saudi
counterparts?
Why did the Bush administration approve the secret airlift of
140 Saudis, including two dozen relatives of Osama bin Laden, just after
September 11? Did one of the Saudi royals on the planes have any advance
knowledge of the attacks?
What specifically chosen words did George W. Bush say on
national television during the 2000 election campaign to trigger Muslim
support? How did Saudi-funded Islamic groups propel Bush to victory in Florida,
thus winning him the presidency?
The answers to these questions
lie in a largely hidden relationship between the House of Bush and the House of
Saud that began in the mid-1970s. An amazing weave of money, power, and
influence, it takes place all over the globe and involves war, covert
operations, and huge deals in oil and defense industries. But, most
horrifyingly of all, the secret liasion between these two great families helped
trigger the Age of Terror and give rise to the tragedy of 9-11.
Reviewed in the United
States
Verified Purchase
This book will test you.
When you wonder aloud why Congress doesn’t get anything done, foreign wars
continue without reason and deficits are so high, most are unable to see the
cause. Unger doesn’t explain it all but he explains the relationship between
money and power better than any book I’ve read to date.
The storyline of the book takes you through how the rich Saudi ruling class and really a group of Texan oilmen bonded over business. When you read about the genesis of the relationship in the 70s during the first part of the book, it looked merely like the cozy insider-only type of stuff that is common in the fabric of corporate America and most human relationships.
But the nuance Unger uncovers with his hawk-like ability to pull minutiae from rivers of source material outlines a darker agenda. His fact finding mission lays bare a Saudi elite trying to nudge the levers of power in Washington. And with this insight, Unger explains the nearly invisible pattern in which money buys powers in America. Unger’s work uncovers so many conspicuous connections amongst so many smart, ambitious men that coincidence is ruled out as the cause. Complicity makes the case here as well as any outsider like Unger can.
But the circumstantial nature of this book cannot be completely swept away. Unger has grokked the nefarious nature of this relationship but is missing the proverbial smoking gun. There is no ipso facto ‘A funded B which lead to C relationship’ outlined in the book. The closest we get to this as a reader is when the Bin Laden family and other Saudi royals are ferried out of the country while the FAA has all airspace on lockdown, a fascinating story that makes the TSA’s security theatre we endure at every airport comically irksome.
Recommending this book is easy, but to whom I would make that recommendation is difficult. If you sometimes watch/read the news with an open mind and wonder, “How did we get to this place?”, then I’d put this book on your list. If you’re knowledge of the middle east and current events is low, try paying attention to that news first, watch for the patterns and then read this to learn the connections. Most importantly though, any citizen trying to understand the ways in which money buys power in the modern nation-state needs to read this book.
The storyline of the book takes you through how the rich Saudi ruling class and really a group of Texan oilmen bonded over business. When you read about the genesis of the relationship in the 70s during the first part of the book, it looked merely like the cozy insider-only type of stuff that is common in the fabric of corporate America and most human relationships.
But the nuance Unger uncovers with his hawk-like ability to pull minutiae from rivers of source material outlines a darker agenda. His fact finding mission lays bare a Saudi elite trying to nudge the levers of power in Washington. And with this insight, Unger explains the nearly invisible pattern in which money buys powers in America. Unger’s work uncovers so many conspicuous connections amongst so many smart, ambitious men that coincidence is ruled out as the cause. Complicity makes the case here as well as any outsider like Unger can.
But the circumstantial nature of this book cannot be completely swept away. Unger has grokked the nefarious nature of this relationship but is missing the proverbial smoking gun. There is no ipso facto ‘A funded B which lead to C relationship’ outlined in the book. The closest we get to this as a reader is when the Bin Laden family and other Saudi royals are ferried out of the country while the FAA has all airspace on lockdown, a fascinating story that makes the TSA’s security theatre we endure at every airport comically irksome.
Recommending this book is easy, but to whom I would make that recommendation is difficult. If you sometimes watch/read the news with an open mind and wonder, “How did we get to this place?”, then I’d put this book on your list. If you’re knowledge of the middle east and current events is low, try paying attention to that news first, watch for the patterns and then read this to learn the connections. Most importantly though, any citizen trying to understand the ways in which money buys power in the modern nation-state needs to read this book.
Josh Hawley: Abolish the World Trade Organization in Wake of
Coronavirus
5 May 2020414
3:45
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) says the
World Trade Organization (WTO) should be abolished in the wake of the Chinese
coronavirus.
In an op-ed for the New
York Times, Hawley credits the WTO with helping to empower “China’s
rise” while weakening American workers:
BLOG: BUSH'S VISION OF
'NEW WORLD ORDER' HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING BUT HIS CARLYLE
GROUP/HALLIBURTON WAR MACHINE AND SAUDIS BIG OIL WHICH HIS FAMILY STARTED TWO
WARS AGAINST THE IRAQIS TO ADVANCE. JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
But in the early 1990s, with America’s
principal adversary gone, Western policymakers were in a messianic frame of
mind. President George H.W. Bush promised a “new world order” of “open
borders, open trade … and open minds,” a new international system based on
liberal values to bring peace to the world. He and other internationalists wanted
a new economic system to match. [Emphasis added]
…
Take the World Trade Organization. Its
mandate was to promote free trade, but the organization instead allowed some
nations to maintain trade barriers and protectionist workarounds, like China,
while preventing others from defending themselves, like the United
States. Foreign agriculture won concession after concession, while
American farmers struggled to get fair access to markets.Meanwhile, the W.T.O.
required American workers to compete against Chinese forced labor but did
next to nothing to stop Chinese theft of American intellectual property and
products. [Emphasis addd]
Under the W.T.O.’s auspices, capital and
goods moved across borders easier than before, no doubt, but so did jobs. And
too many jobs left America’s borders for elsewhere. As factories closed,
workers suffered, from small towns to the urban core. Inflation-adjusted,
working wages stagnated and upward mobility flatlined. [Emphasis added]
Enough is enough. The W.T.O. should
be abolished, and along with it, the new model global economy. The quest
to turn the world into a liberal order of democracies was always
misguided. It always depended on unsustainable American sacrifice and
force of arms. And its companion economic order has, in a similar vein,
succeeded mostly in weakening American workers and industry. [Emphasis added]
The U.S., Hawley writes, ought to “seek
new arrangements and new rules” to restore the nation’s economic sovereignty —
which includes returning to the economic system before the WTO’s creation,
where reciprocal trade “protected our national interests and the nation’s
workers.” Hawley writes:
That means returning production to this
country, securing our critical supply chains and encouraging domestic
innovation and manufacturing. It means striking trade deals that are truly
mutual and truly beneficial for America and walking away when they are not. It
means building a new network of trusted friends and partners to resist Chinese
economic imperialism.
Since the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted and China entered the World Trade Organization
(WTO), nearly five million American manufacturing jobs have
been eliminated from the American economy — 3.4
million of which are due to U.S. free
trade with China. The mass elimination of working- and middle-class jobs
and depressed U.S. wages due to NAFTA and China’s entering the WTO have
coincided with a more than 600 percent increase in trade deficits.
Of the 3.4 million American jobs lost
due to free trade with China, about 2.6 million — or about three-fourths — were
lost in the crippled manufacturing industry. U.S. trade deficits with China
have eliminated American jobs in all
50 states.
Bush
Center Slams Trump: We Want More Migration
3 May 202022
7:11
The
economics director at President George W. Bush’s advocacy center slammed
President Donald Trump’s popular, pro-American immigration policy.
The May 1 slam came just before Bush posted a May 2 video urging
national unity in the coronavirus crash that has pushed more than 25 million
Americans out of jobs.
“The most important thing to
remember in this is that we don’t want [Trump’s] temporary policy to become
permanent immigration policy,” economic director Laura Collins said a video
posted on the center’s Twitter account. She continued:
We know immigrants are good for the economy. We know they’re
good for our culture. We know they’re in this fight with us together, and we’re
going to meet them working with us side by side in any recovery after the
pandemic is over.
Trump’s April 22 immigration
policy says the economic needs of American employees are more
important than the immigration preferences of foreigners. His policy
temporarily trims the annual inflow of legal immigrants and directs agencies to
review visa worker programs in 30 days.
Polls show the public — including recent
immigrants — is overwhelmingly aligned
with Trump in prioritizing jobs for Americans over welcomes for legal
immigrants.
The visa worker programs targeted by
Trump are extremely important to the Fortune 500. In response, the companies’
lobbyists and progressives allies have quickly launched a hard-nosed lobbying campaign and a soft-focus PR campaign to protect the programs and mass migration.
Immigrants and native-born Americans have
always been on the same team driving American innovation and economic growth.
It will take #AllOfUS, working together, to restore the United States. https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/diversity-inclusion/495352-jose-andres-naacp-and-others-launch-pro …
Jose Andres, NAACP and others launch pro-immigrant
coronavirus
BLOG: FOR EVERY ILLEGAL CAUGHT AT THE BORDER IT IS ESTIMATED THAT 8 ARE NEVER CAUGHT. NOW DO THE MATH AND YOU WILL SEE WHY WE HAVE 40 MILLION OF THEM IN OUR OPEN BORDERS VOTING DEMOCRAT FOR MORE!
Congress now accepts 1 million legal immigrants per year.
It also allows companies to keep roughly 2 million cheap and
complaint foreign visa-workers in U.S. jobs. The 2 million workforce includes
roughly 1.5 million foreign white-collar visa workers, plus roughly 400,000
foreign blue-collar guest workers, in professional or seasonal jobs needed by
roughly 26 million unemployed Americans.
Collins touted the corporate PR campaign, dubbed #AllofUs, in
her video slamming Trump’s pro-employee policy.
.@LVTCollins explains how it will take #AllOfUs, immigrants and native-born Americans, to defeat COVID-19. And once our
nation emerges from quarantine, it will take all of us working together to
restart our economy.
“The stated objectives of this executive order were to preserve
medical supplies in a pandemic for American immigrants already here and to
preserve job openings in any recovery for American workers that can be first in
line,” Collins said her video posted May 1.
She continued:
Unfortunately, this executive order is not going to accomplish
either of those objectives.
First of all, the virus affects all of us equally. It doesn’t
care who we are, or where we’re from. Current travel restrictions and
quarantine protocols in place, protect us from viral spread regardless of where
we’re from. And so there’s not really a need to prevent more people from coming
in in terms of slowing down viral spread. We know the virus is here and it’s
spreading. And what we’re doing is working.
However, Collins’ main focus is the economic worry that Trump’s reform
may permanently reduce the unending inflow of foreign workers, consumers, and
renters preferred by CEOs and investors. She said:
We know immigrants are good for the economy. We know immigrants
don’t compete with native-born Americans for jobs. And we know that before the
pandemic, there were millions of unfilled jobs in the United States.
If we assume that in any recovery, all those jobs come back,
every American that wants a job will have the ability to fill the jobs that
were there. We’re still going to have shortages and we’re going to need
immigrants there to help fill those jobs.
We simply don’t have a labor force at full employment, big
enough to fill all the jobs in the economy.
Immigrants — like the birth of Americans’ children — help grow
the economy. They expand the labor force, boost retail sales, spike real estate
values, fuel the stock market, and expand the number of companies. A growing
economy can be good for all — but it is especially good for wealthy people who
can invest in company stocks.
Yet every annual wave of immigrants also causes much economic
harm to the roughly 220 million Americans (and recent legal immigrants) who
work for a living, or who are educating themselves to take jobs in a few years.
Every new wave of legal immigrants
and illegal migrants competes for existing jobs and force down Americans’
wages. The arrivals also expand
poverty, reduce pressure on investors to
buy productivity-boosting
machines, drive up the price of good
housing, and add congestion to K-12 schools and universities.
Immigrants, and especially visa
workers, also
push Americans out of
careers and technological
research, and they distort Americans’
politics by expanding cultural
diversity and identity politics.
Over the last 30
years, since George Bush’s father signed
a 1990 bill roughly doubling immigration, the government’s massive inflow of
immigrants has kept Americans wages
almost flat (until 2018) and so has
turbocharged the U.S. stock market.
The establishment’s immigration policy has worked with free
trade to shift much wealth from middle-class employees and the heartland states
towards the stock market and the major coastal cities.
Trump was elected in 2016 to help reverse the establishment’s
economic policy.
Since 2017, he has mostly stopped illegal migration, and
he pushed wages up for blue-collars in 2018 and 2019. He has also trimmed legal
immigration, and his April 22 policy sets the stage for incremental,
significant reductions in the visa worker programs, such as the little-known
B-1 and OPT visa programs.
Business lobbies strongly oppose reductions in immigration and
visa workers.
Public opinion has shifted strongly against mass migration, so a bipartisan
front of #AllofUScare billionaires is using
Christian & patriotic themes to help preserve their supply of
wage-cutting workers & rent-raising consumers. https://bit.ly/2VUqCXo
'All of Us Care' Billionaires Defend Migration Using
Christianity, Patriotism
Collins’ pro-migration views reflect George W. Bush’s
pro-business leaning and his 2001 push to allow U.S. employers to bypass Americans
and instead hire any willing workers from anywhere on the globe. The 2001 Twin
Towers attack stopped Bush’s “Any Willing Worker” plan.
Collins insisted, “We know immigrants don’t compete with
native-born Americans for jobs.”
If immigrants “do jobs that Americans won’t do”, we should be
able to identify occupations in which the workers are nearly all foreign-born.
However, among the 474 separate occupations defined by the Department of
Commerce, we find only a handful of majority-immigrant occupations, and none
completely dominated by immigrants (legal or illegal). Furthermore, in none of
the 474 occupations do illegal immigrants constitute a majority of workers.
For example, companies provide the reward of green cards to
roughly 50,000 foreign visa-workers each year after those foreign workers have
taken technology jobs from Americans via the H-1B and other visa programs.
Business groups warn the Trump administration: 'Extend work permits for our
foreign visa-workers or we'll have "hundreds and thousands" of open
jobs for unemployed American voters.'#H1Bhttps://bit.ly/2YlijWd
Fortune 500 to Agencies: Help Keep U.S. Jobs Filled with
200,000-plus Visa Workers
EconomyImmigrationPoliticsAny Willing
WorkerGeorge W.
BushH-1BImmigrantsimmigrationMigrantsmigrationOpen Bordersvisa workers
Exclusive–Jeff Sessions: Why Bring Foreign Workers to U.S. When
30,000,000 Americans Are Jobless?
4,746
3:07
United
States Senate candidate Jeff Sessions says there is no shortage of American
labor, calling out lawmakers and their “corporate friends” for supporting a
continued flow of foreign workers to the U.S. to take jobs in the midst of mass
unemployment.
In an
exclusive interview with Alexander Marlow on SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart
News Daily, Sessions said it is critical that lawmakers defend the
interests of unemployed Americans who have been laid off due to forced business
closures spurred by the Chinese coronavirus crisis.
LISTEN:
“We have 30
million unemployed … We don’t have jobs in the United States,” Sessions said.
“There are no jobs now. We’ll lay off more people this week then we did last
week.”
“Why would
we bring in foreign workers to take jobs when we don’t have jobs for the
American people,” Sessions asked. “What theory is it that they’re operating
under when they try to justify such a policy position? It’s certainly not in
the interest of the American people. It’s in the interest of their corporate
friends and some ideology that they adhere to … so I do think that it’s time for
this Congress to deliver on its promises that the president made in the
campaign.”
Sessions
said more Republican lawmakers must be stepping up to the plate to take on
China, holding the communist regime accountable for wrecking the U.S. economy.
A select committee in the House and Senate, Sessions said, ought to be formed
to determine the truth behind China’s role in spreading the coronavirus to the
world.
“Where are
the rest of the Republicans? Where are they? I mean this is a big issue,”
Sessions said. “This party owes it to the American people to defend our
interests — American interests. And I don’t think there’s been near enough
action.”
“I would
think the first thing we need to do is to rally the people who understand the
significance of this and have what I call for, is a select committee to study
this pandemic and how it started,” Sessions continued. “We did that after the
attack on Pearl Harbor … where House and Senate appoint select members of
congress … and the charge is what did China know and what did they do, when did
they act on it or not, and did they lie about it? The world needs to know.”
As Breitbart
has reported, existing U.S. legal immigration law
greatly benefits China. Visa programs such as the EB-5 visa for wealthy foreign investors, the
F-1 student visa, and J-1 visas allow about 180,000 Chinese nationals to
enter the country every year in addition to the 60,000 to 70,000 Chinese
nationals who secure green cards annually.
There are
nearly 500,000 Chinese students in the U.S. in
any given year — more than any other nation — taking seats in university
classrooms and looking to eventually obtain Optional Practical Training (OPT)
authorization to take entry-level jobs in white-collar professions.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart
News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
No comments:
Post a Comment