Thursday, May 28, 2020

SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN, MY PARTY IS FOR WAR, WAR PROFITEERING AND OPEN BORDERS WITH MEXICO - I CAN'T EVEN COUNT THE MONEY I'VE MADE AS A WAR PROFITEER


WE KNOW THERE IS NO ONE ON EARTH WHO LIKES SQUANDERING MONEY ON DEFENSE COMPANIES THAT WAR PROFITEER SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN!
SHE’S MADE A VAST FORTUNE, ONE OF MANY, IN THE WAR INDUSTRY


BRIBES AND DEALS SIPHONED THROUGH HER PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM FROM THE FOLLOWING:

1. Wells Fargo (Banking)
2. Northrop Grumman (Defense)
 3. Bank of America (Banking)
 4. General Atomics (Defense)
5. General Dynamics (Defense)


Hidden in the New House Coronavirus Relief Bill: Billions for Defense Contractors

A section of the HEROES Act championed by Virginia Democrat Gerry Connolly would cover executive compensation and other perks for defense and intel contractors. The legislation’s wording mirrors what an industry group proposed.

by Jake Pearson

Virginia Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly on the floor of the House of Representatives on April 23. (House Television via AP)
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.
When they passed another bill this month to help the tens of millions of Americans left unemployed and hurt by the COVID-19 pandemic, Democrats in the House of Representatives touted the $3 trillion legislation’s benefits to working people, renters, first responders and others struggling to get by.
They made no mention of the defense contractors.
Tucked away deep in the nearly 2,000-page Health and Economic Recovery Omnibus Emergency Solutions, or HEROES, Act, is a section that will funnel money to defense and intelligence companies and their top executives, according to experts.
The section of the new bill seeks to “clarify” a provision of the $2 trillion CARES Act that passed on March 27. That legislation reimburses firms for the wages and benefits of contract employees who must be kept “in a ready state, including to protect the life and safety of Government and contractor personnel,” but who can’t work because federal offices are closed or they’re following stay-at-home orders.
In language that mirrors what an industry group proposed, the HEROES Act goes beyond just reimbursing wages. It says that such firms can bill the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies for a range of other costs associated with “the financial impact incurred” of keeping workers employed during the health crisis. That includes for “fees,” a term of art in federal contracting, and “general and administrative expenses,” a catch-all phrase associated with the costs of running a business such as paying executives, running the corporate office and even marketing and sales.
The Senate has yet to take up the new House bill, so the companies have not reaped a windfall yet. But experts say that if the Senate passes a new bill, this clause would likely survive.
The legislation was effectively a stealthy way to bail out the defense and intelligence government contracting industry and their executives at taxpayer expense, said Mandy Smithberger, who directs the Center for Defense Information at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group.
Others agreed. “It’s one thing for the government to say, ‘We’ll keep the workers going,’” said Charles Tiefer, a University of Baltimore School of Law professor who specializes in government contracting. “But this is money for the firm.”
In a statement provided by a spokesperson, Rep. Gerry Connolly, a Democrat who championed the relief bills’ contracting sections and whose Virginia district is home to many contract employees and companies, said the legislation’s goal was to make sure these firms “can survive this crisis and recover their lost revenue.”
He said the HEROES Act language wasn’t intended as a “loophole” for firms to bill for expenses like corporate headquarter costs and said he would “object if the Trump Administration interpreted it as such.” But he didn’t answer questions about why he fought to include the broader HEROES Act language that would allow for such charges or why its text matched what an industry group had proposed.
The defense and intelligence agencies have increasingly become reliant on hundreds of thousands of government contractors for everything from fighting on the battlefield to setting up classified computer systems to cleaning offices. At the Department of Defense, which spends more than all other government agencies combined on contractors, the amount obligated for such agreements jumped from $189 billion in fiscal year 2000 to $320 billion in fiscal 2017, according to a July 2018 Congressional Research Service report.
While small businesses that contract with the government would qualify for the reimbursement outlined in the COVID-19 relief bills, major multinational corporations like Raytheon Technologies and market champions like Amazon Web Services would too.
The taxpayer price tag for the section would be enormous.
Already the federal bailout for just payroll and benefits for defense contractor employees stuck at home outlined in the CARES Act will run in the “billions and billions,” the Pentagon’s top acquisition official, Ellen Lord, told reporters in an April 23 press briefing.
Executive compensation, fees and other expenses would be on top of that.
In federal contracting, general and administrative expenses relate to all the costs of running a home office, including support staff whose jobs can’t be billed to any one government contract and the salaries of executives. (The Bipartisan Budget Act caps the amount executives can be paid from a government contract at $540,000 a year, though the firms can augment that through other means, including by using profits from a government contract.)
The HEROES Act language introduces its own ambiguity about what firms can charge when it comes to what are referred to as “fees.” In certain federal contracts, the recipients are paid a fee on top of their costs. In others, fees refer to money contractors pay to third parties like lawyers and accounting firms. The new language opens the door for contractors to count those as billable, even if work isn’t being done, said Tiefer, the contracting expert.
“And now they still collect even though some of their workers are home,” he said.
At issue is a section in the CARES Act that reimburses contractors at “minimum applicable contract billing rates.” The vaguely worded term touched off a blitz of inquiries and suggestions in the weeks after the CARES Act passed from Beltway firms who perform IT, security and other national defense services for the federal government. The HEROES Act section pushed by Connolly seeks to “clarify” that.
The Intelligence and National Security Alliance, a trade group that says it represents more than 160 companies that do work for the Department of Defense and the intelligence community, was among the firms that lobbied for the new language. In an April 15 letter to the DOD, Larry Hanauer, the group’s vice president for policy, suggested that the term “minimum applicable contract billing rates” should mean “an employee’s base hourly wage rate, plus indirect costs, fees, and general and administrative expenses.”
That language made it into the HEROES Act, which defined “minimum applicable contract billing rates” to include costs “such as the base hourly wage rate of an employee, plus indirect costs, fees, and general and administrative expenses.”
Peggy O’Connor, an INSA spokeswoman, said nobody from her organization discussed the HEROES Act with Connolly’s office and she didn’t know how the group’s suggested definition of “minimum applicable contract billing rates” wound up in the bill.
“There were a lot of letters drafted by various organizations,” she said. “We posted ours, as well as various government guidance memorandum on our website, which is open to the public.”
The industry’s largest trade organization, the Professional Services Council, issued a statement thanking Connolly for his efforts after the HEROES Act passed the House on May 12. A spokeswoman for PSC declined to answer questions about the bill’s language or the group’s interactions with Connolly ahead of the vote.
The six-term congressman has long been an advocate for contracting firms and before joining Congress worked for the Science Applications International Corp., a government contractor that became Leidos. Among his top contributors since taking office in 2008 are government contractors Northrop Grumman, Leidos and Deloitte LLP.

Dump the F-35 program plagued with excessive costs and failing weapons

Wasteful, counterproductive spending is a threat to U.S. military readiness that should be rooted out now before taxpayers are saddled with “sustainment costs” that will burden future generations.
That’s just one of several takeaways from a just-released government accountability report analyzing the many defects of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. With government spending proceeding at an unprecedented and dangerous level in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, now is the time for the Trump administration to search for ways to offset the impact of future stimulus efforts.
While it’s important for our military to exploit its technological prowess with an eye toward China and other rising threats, there appears to be a misguided effort to pack everything into one plane ranging from stealth technology to vertical takeoff ability.
At a time when the economy is in recession and the national debt is rising, defense spending must be smart and efficient. But since its inception in 2001, the F-35 has been bedeviled with cost overruns that are coming back to bite taxpayers without delivering any return on their investment.
The major findings from the Government Accountability Office report should give defense planners good reason to hit the pause button. They don’t need to go back very far into the history of the program to see that it has gone sideways.
From 2018 to 2019, the GAO reports the total cost estimate of the F-35 acquisition program increased by $22 billion from $406 billion to over $428 billion.
These costs are supposedly tied in with needed hardware and software upgrades. But where does it all end? The answer seems to be that it doesn’t since the acquisition costs are just the beginning. The sustainment costs, the costs needed to keep the program running once it's activated for its planned 66-year life cycle, are eye-popping. GAO reports costs will hit $1.2 trillion, bringing the total cost of the F-35 program to more than $1.6 trillion.
But what about military readiness? Is there an argument to made that the F-35 will give the United States the critical edge it needs in 21st-century warfare that justifies its exorbitant costs? Once again, GAO findings strongly suggest otherwise. In fact, the F-35 program is beset with thousands of “deficiencies” that directly affect its fighter capabilities.
“Through 2019, F-35 program test officials had identified over 3,200 deficiencies,” the GAO report says. “Deficiencies represent specific instances where the weapon system either does not meet requirements or where the safety, suitability, or effectiveness of the weapon system could be affected. The test officials categorize deficiencies according to their potential impact on the aircraft’s performance.”
The prospects for improving and altering the F-35 to the point where it can be transformed into a lean, mean fighting machine are bleak. A $17 billion Lockheed Martin Corp. diagnostic system used to analyze the F-35 and detect potential flaws in need of repairs is itself laced with flaws. Maintenance crews at military bases reportedly said they spent an average of 5,000 to 10,000 hours each year tracking information that the diagnostic system should have tracked automatically.
The runaway costs of the F-35 have not escaped the notice of President Trump, who tweeted about the fighter jet's many problems. Now is the time for him to pull the plug on the costly mess that subtracts needed resources away from other vital projects.
Kevin Mooney (@KevinMooneyDC) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog. He is an investigative reporter in Washington, D.C., who writes for several national publications.

 Senator Dianne Feinstein
  • Website
  • SF Office
    (415) 393-0707
  • DC Office
    (202) 224-3841
  • Los Angeles Office
    (310) 914-7300

 

WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN SUCKS OFF BRIBES AND DEALS SIPHONED THROUGH HER PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM FROM THE FOLLOWING:

1. Wells Fargo (Banking)
2. Northrop Grumman (Defense)
 3. Bank of America (Banking)
 4. General Atomics (Defense)
5. General Dynamics (Defense)


SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN RANKS AS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

 

SHE HAS AMASSE A STAGGERING FORTUNE AS SHE STALKED THE HALLS OF CONGRESS SNIFFING OUT DEALS THAT SHE AND BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER VOTED ON THAT DROPPED HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS INTO THE POCKETS OF FEINSTEIN’S PIMP-HUSBAND RICHARD BLUM

 

BLUM HAS HANDED OUT CAMPAIGN “CONTRIBUTIONS” BRIBES TO VIRTUALLY ALL MAJOR DEM POLS SO THEY KEEP THEIR MOUTHS CLOSED ABOUT FEINSTEIN’S STAGGERING CORRUPTION.

 

FEINSTEIN HAS VOTED AGAINST ALL SENATE ATTEMPTS TO CURB SIPHONING OFF BRIBES TO FAMILY MEMBERS IN THE FORM OF “CONSULTANT” FEES.

 

BARBARA “BRIBES” BOXER MADE A VAST FORTUNE SHE SIPHONED OVER TO HER SON, OAKLAN LAWYER DOUG BOXER.

 

PELOSI HAS SIPHONED OFF BRIBES TO HER HUSBAND. AND THEN THERE ARE THE BACK ROOM DEALS BLUM MADE TO PROFIT ON FEINSTEIN’S RED CHINA CONNECTIONS.

 

JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY AS THESE TRAITORS DESTROY OUR COUNTRY AND FILL THEIR POCKETS DOING IT!

 


*
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics experts.

“All in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon

“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes.  This is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan  AMERICAN THINKER.com

 

 

 

A SEARCH FOR FEINSTEIN AND WAR 


PROFITEER

 

 

Search Results

Web results

Dianne Feinstein: War profiteer and war criminal | Freepress.org


1.      
Jul 5, 2013 - Dianne FeinsteinWar profiteer and war criminal ... Senator Feinstein has been quick to be at the forefront of defending these programs and ...

Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering - Antiwar.com Original


1.      
Feb 28, 2006 - If the antiwar movement takes on the Democrats for their bitter shortcomings, a few liberals are bound to criticize us for not hounding Bush instead. ... According to the Center for Public Integrity, Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum has racked in millions of dollars from Perini, a ...

Dianne Feinstein: War Profiteer - Antiwar.com Original


1.      
Oct 11, 2009 - Dianne FeinsteinWar Profiteer. Justin Raimondo ... A particularly brazen example of the latter is SenDianne Feinstein, Democrat of California ...

Feinstein Family War Profits - Daily Kos


1.      
May 11, 2006 - Senator Dianne Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, could well be called ... ties and war profiteering, as it did in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, then ... senator's spouse gleaning off the spoils of war and passing it along to ...

Senator Feinstein - War Profiteer by Marriage. - Daily Kos


1.      
Feb 28, 2006 - Is this the kind of Democrat we want serving us? We already have Lieberman, Biden, Dodd and a host of other DINOs. It's about time for ...

Sen. Feinstein as a Merchant of Death - LewRockwell


1.      
Apr 4, 2007 - Democratic Blood Money and Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering ... Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California silently resigned from ...

Army contract for Feinstein's husband / Blum is a director of ...


1.      
Apr 22, 2003 - URS Corp., a San Francisco planning and engineering firm partially owned by California SenDianne Feinstein's husband, landed an Army ...

Democratic Blood Money and Senator Feinstein's War ...


1.      
Apr 5, 2007 - Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein of California silently resigned ... Here's a brief rundown of the Feinstein family's blatant war profiteering.

(DV) Frank: Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering


1.      
Senator Feinstein's War Profiteering by Joshua Frank www.dissidentvoice.org. March 1, 2006. Send this page to a friend! (click here). It happens all the time.

The Greatest Threat to Campus Free Speech is Coming From ...


1.      
2.      
Sep 25, 2015 - ... about Israel that Dianne Feinstein and her war-profiteering husband ... Illinois Democratic Senator Dick Durbin — is merely illustrative of this ...
Page 2 of about 28,100 results (0.42 seconds) 

Search Results

Web results

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's Husband, Richard Blum, Grows Fortune


1.      
Jul 16, 2015 - Richard Blum, husband of U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein, has ... has a $50,000–$100,000 investment in Colony American Homes War I and no ...

Code Pink, Raging Grannies ask Feinstein to return profits to ...


1.      
Apr 9, 2007 - of corruption and war profiteering. Feinstein releases statement ... Senator Dianne Feinstein and Richard C. Blum. Feinstein has since broken ...

The CIA: the double life of Dianne Feinstein | Editorial ...


1.      
Mar 11, 2014 - Editorial: The exasperation with the Democratic senator from California is that she hasn't also directed her outrage at the NSA.

War Profiteering – Underground Network


1.      
2.      
War profiteers are people, corporations, or any actors that profit from war. ... US Senator Dianne Feinstein, who voted in favor of the Iraq Resolution, and her ...

Sen Dianne Feinstein's Husband Top Iraq War Profiteer - Democratic ...


1.      
Jul 24, 2008 - 32 posts - ‎28 authors
That's because Blum's wife, Senator Dianne Feinstein, appears to have used her seat on the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee ...

Dianne Feinstein - Wikipedia


1.      
2.      
Dianne Goldman Berman Feinstein is an American politician serving as the senior United ... At the age of 86, Feinstein is the oldest sitting U.S. Senator. ... committee has coincided with the Senate Report on Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq and the ...
Political party‎: ‎Democratic
Children‎: ‎Katherine
Education‎: ‎Stanford University‎ (‎BA‎)
Constituency‎: ‎At-large district (1970–1978); 2nd ...
Missing: profiteers ‎| Must include: profiteers

Political positions of Dianne Feinstein - Wikipedia


1.      
2.      
Dianne Feinstein is the current senior senator in the U.S. Senate representing California. ... Feinstein supported the Iraq war resolution in the vote of October 11, 2002; she has since claimed that she was misled by President Bush on the ...
Political party‎: ‎Democratic
Missing: profiteers ‎| Must include: profiteers

Censored 2009: The Top 25 Censored Stories of 2007-08


Peter Phillips, ‎Andy Lee Roth, ‎Project Censored - 2011 - ‎Political Science
And in December 2007, Judicial Watch ranked Senator Feinstein as one of ... Sources “The Diane Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal,” Rush Limbaugh, ...

The Economics of War: Profiteering, Militarism and Imperialism


Imad A. Moosa - 2019 - ‎Political Science
Profiteering, Militarism and Imperialism Imad A. Moosa ... (2003) has reported that US senator Dianne Feinstein, who voted in favour of the invasion of Iraq, and ...

Kissinger's Shadow: The Long Reach of America's Most ...


Greg Grandin - 2015 - ‎Biography & Autobiography
Iran-Contra and Senator John Kerry's hearings on the CIA's use of drug ... activities in Nicaragua, and now to Senator Dianne Feinstein's torture report, and the ... the press; Blackwater; Abu Ghraib; war profiteering; the torture memos; drones.

Page 3 of about 24 results (0.37 seconds) 

Search Results

Web results

Combating War Profiteering: Are We Doing Enough to ...


Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One ... Jr., Delaware HERB KOHL, Wisconsin DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California RUSSELL ...

The Corruption of Senator Feinstein - Indybay


1.      
2.      
PDF
Dec 10, 2015 - SenDianne Feinstein's husband wins CA rail contract . ... The Feinsstein Family held war profiteering contracts in Afghanistan, Bolivia and ...

The Dianne Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal - The Rush ...


1.      
Mar 29, 2007 - The Dianne Feinstein War Profiteering Scandal. Mar 29 ... 'SenDianne Feinstein has resigned from the Military Construction Appropriations ...

Images for sen. dianne feinstein war profiteers


Web results

Diane Feinstein's Conflict of Interest in Iraq | Town Square ...


1.      
Feb 24, 2008 - Shortly before my expose of Senator Dianne Feinstein's conflict of interest was published in January ... Blum & Feinstein - Corrupt War Profiteer

Feinstein quits committee under war-profiteer cloud - WND


1.      
Mar 28, 2007 - SenDianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has abruptly walked away from her responsibilities with the Senate Military Construction Appropriations ...

Dianne Feinstein: War Profiteer | Dyncorp Sucks


1.      
Oct 12, 2009 - A particularly brazen example of the latter is SenDianne Feinstein, Democrat of California and formerly the mayor of what is generally ...

Lev Parnas on Maddow: Trump Knew 'Exactly What Was ...


2 days ago - “It was never about corruption,” Parnas said, referring to the unreliable Trump-team claim that the administration wanted to go after profiteering ...

How to Profit Off War: Iraq, Afghanistan and Big-Money ...


1.      
2.      
Jan 18, 2015 - war profiteer is any person or organization that profits from warfare or by selling weapons and other goods to parties at war. The term has ...



No comments: