On
a fundamental level, Obama understands that America is not the systemically
racist cesspool he allowed it to be portrayed as under his watch. Yet he
was Machiavellian enough to let this yarn spin itself for the purpose of political
advantage.
Another prominent Democrat who
supports the
room Barack Obama launched his
political career.
"That phase of the takeover was
started in 2008 by
President Barack
Obama. Throughout his eight years in
office, Obama practiced divisiveness and
hammered away at the Second Amendment while pouring gallons of fuel
on the fire of the "Black Lives Matter" lie. His
administration was rampant with corruption, pushing the envelope
with every new scandal." RICK HAYES
Illegal
Immigration and Marxism
Even though the law doesn’t allow them to vote, illegal immigrants are
changing the landscape of the U.S. government, especially in California, by
impacting the census’ through mass migration. California allows illegal
aliens to vote.
The Obama Years Sowed the Seeds for the Current Societal Chaos
The election of Barack
Obama in 2008 and the unfathomable defeat of his hand-picked successor Hillary
Clinton in 2016 rendered inevitable the societal chaos and attempted cultural
revolution presently roiling the country. This entire wretched
spectacle comes with a label of origin: Manufactured by Obama and Associates.
After nearly 40 years of
gradual infiltration and eventual domination of the Democrat party, as well as
the media, entertainment and education establishments, the radicalized American
left in 2008 achieved a major objective.
BLOG EDITOR: NO ONE CAN
REMEMBER A SINGLE THING BARACK OBAMA DID FOR BLACK AMERICA AS HE AND HOLDER
SABOTAGED AMERICAN LAWS, VOTING AND BORDERS TO FLOOD AMERICA WITH DEM VOTING
MEXICANS.
They found their ideal
stealth candidate, Barack Obama. Not only was he, beneath the façade of
glibness and conviviality, a fellow Marxist/socialist, but more importantly, he
was able to take advantage of decades of inculcated racial guilt among the
populace.
Thus began the final
stages of the grand strategy to fundamentally transform the nation, following
the installation of the most radical administration in the history of the
country. Revealingly, the victors were unabashedly shameless in their
triumph. In their myopic belief that they and their fellow travelers were
permanently ensconced in government, the Obama administration and their
sycophants in the media did not hesitate to openly advocate and implement
policies not wanted by the electorate. Whether health care reform,
amnesty for illegal aliens, unfettered and unrestrained voting and attendant
fraud, gun control or packing the judiciary with likeminded leftists, their
primary purpose was not, as they proclaimed, to improve the lives of the
citizenry but to make certain the radical left would be permanent occupants in
the corridors of power.
Additionally, and for the
same overall objective, Barack Obama and his henchmen deliberately fanned the
flames of race and identity politics to further divide the populace and foment
riots that would dramatically enhance the power of the central
government. Obama never missed an opportunity to pour gasoline on the
flames of violence and racial animosity, whether it was justifying voter
intimidation by the Black Panthers in Philadelphia, the Trayvon Martin incident
in Florida, the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri or the Freddie
Gray episode in Baltimore, among others. Thus, Obama gave his tacit
imprimatur to the formation of the Marxist Black Lives Matter Organization and
wordlessly sanctioned violence and looting in any racially charged incident in
the future.
Therefore, every action,
policy and pronouncement made during the eight years of the Obama
Administration must be viewed through the prism of Marxist/socialist
megalomania and self-aggrandizement.
The destructive
political/economic philosophies of Marxism and socialism are embraced by modern
day self-absorbed supremacists not to improve the lot of the proletariat but to
achieve permanent political power. The governing end-product of Marxist
thought is the same as monarchies and oligarchies -- the domination of a state
by a select class or individual. Today’s progressives or
Marxists/socialists are no different than those other rulers throughout the
history of mankind who fervently believed they were pre-ordained as a class to
rule the masses.
As modern democratic
societies will not accept the concept of an authoritarian dictator or monarch,
a powerful central government dominated by true believers, with its trappings
of legitimacy, serves as a substitute. For this strategy to succeed, the
public must, over time, be manipulated and intimidated by the unrelenting
provocation of class animosity, and unique to America, insoluble racial conflict.
In due course, a
progressively larger swath of an intentionally ill-educated populace is gulled
into accepting the premise that only government -- and not the individual --
can provide societal peace and the guarantee of economic security for everyone.
This cannot be accomplished in a country such as the United States in an era of
adversity but rather one of overwhelming peace and prosperity when the public
is quiescent and content.
The last period of true
national hardship was the 1930s and the Great Depression. In the
intervening eighty years, as the United States evolved into the most powerful
economic and military force the world has ever seen and its citizens the most
prosperous, there has been an inexorable and near irreversible march to government
domination of the citizenry. Parallel to this track has been the rise of
an ever-increasingly radicalized American Left.
Over this same period,
the bulk of the electorate, reveling in their prosperity and international
status, assumed the nation was in reasonably good hands with the two political
parties whose motives and agenda were rarely, if ever, questioned. Most
did not realize that by the mid 2000’s the increasingly radicalized left had a
stranglehold on the Democratic Party.
Equally culpable for this
nation being in its current predicament is the feckless Republican Party. It
was, and remains, the only viable opposition, due to fact that the governmental
structure of the United States can only function with just two major political
parties. Over the recent decades the Republican party establishment was
more concerned about civility and status and were unwilling to fully warn the
populace of the consequences of an all-powerful central government and the
pitfalls inherent in the takeover of the education and entertainment
establishment by the left.
The majority of elected
and establishment Republicans were content to merely slow down the march to
socialism, which eventuated in Barack Obama and his fellow travelers assuming
the reins of power -- a man who will be remembered in the annals of American
history as the most destabilizing and least patriotic president ever elected.
The unfathomable loss to
Donald Trump in 2016 was the first major setback to the American left since the
election of Ronald Reagan. Their giddiness during the Obama years over
implementing their plans for permanent hegemony in American politics was
replaced with uncontrolled anger, pettiness and an insatiable determination to
exact revenge on those who dared deny them their birthright.
The left would have
reluctantly accepted a loss to a Mitt Romney clone, viewing it a setback,
albeit a minor one, that would simply delay the inevitable. But Donald
Trump together with all the factions that voted for him, as well as the conservative
media, represented an existential threat to their grandiose plans for
themselves. Their mortal enemies must not only be annihilated by any
means possible but their ashes strewn across the desert regardless of the
consequences to the nation as a whole.
Thus, the Russian
collusion hoax, the unremitting vilification of Donald Trump
and anyone connected to him, incessant and adolescent name calling, the
Ukraine impeachment debacle, never-ending lies and wholesale fabrications in
the media, the deliberate and ongoing attempt to prolong the unnecessary
anxiety over the Wuhan Virus pandemic, and now utilizing their militant army of
mind-numbed and oblivious automatons to promulgate violence and destruction
throughout the nation.
The actual target of this
treasonous and juvenile temper tantrum, aided and abetted by the credulous
buffoons in the media, is not Donald Trump. It is the citizenry and
everything this nation stands for and has accomplished in 244 years, so that
never again will the people insolently reject the Marxist/socialists as they
did after Obama, when the left stood on the brink of permanent domination.
To that end, instead of
nominating a stealth candidate, as in 2008, the nominee will be a
ventriloquist’s dummy in Joe Biden who will do and say whatever he is
told. All the while they are counting on the voting public to blame Trump
for the four years of carnage inflicted by the radical left. Accordingly,
the citizenry having learned their lesson about electing an irredeemable and
loutish outsider will overwhelmingly vote for Biden and the Democrats. Or
so these narcissistic cretins have convinced themselves.
Pollak: Barack Obama Wrote the Playbook on
Political Division
Left-wing
pundits have accused President Donald Trump of using his tweets last weekend to
launch a divisive re-election campaign.
David Axelrod, former adviser to
President Barack Obama, tweeted: “With his
deliberate, racist outburst, @realDonaldTrump wants to raise the profile of his
targets, drive Dems to defend them and make them emblematic of the entire
party. It’s a cold, hard strategy.”
That is debatable — but if so,
Axelrod should know; Obama did it first.
By 2011, Obama knew that re-election
would be difficult. The Tea Party had just led the Republicans to a historic
victory in the 2010 midterm elections, winning the House and nearly taking the
Senate. The economy was only growing sluggishly, and Obama’s stimulus had
failed to keep unemployment below eight percent, as projected. Moreover, the
passage of Obamacare had provoked a backlash against Obama’s state-centered
model of American society.
Facing a similar situation in the
mid-1990s, President Bill Clinton had “triangulated,” moving back toward the
middle, frustrating the GOP by taking up their issues, such as welfare reform.
But Obama rejected that approach.
Having watched his icon, Chicago mayor Harold Washington, settle for an incremental
approach when faced with opposition in the 1980s, only to die of a sudden heart
attack before fulfilling his potential, Obama chose the path of hard-left
policy — and divide-and-rule politics.
The first hint of his strategy
emerged during the debt ceiling negotiations in the summer of August 2011. As
Bob Woodward recounted in his book
about the crisis, The Price
of Politics, then-Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) had
wanted to reach a “grand bargain” with the president on long-term spending
cuts. But Obama blew up that agreement by demanding $400 billion in new taxes,
to his aides’ surprise. Obama wanted an opponent, not a deal. (Last week,
Boehner told Breitbart News
Tonight that Obama’s decision was his worst disappointment in
35 years of politics.)
In the fall of 2011, a new left-wing
movement, Occupy Wall Street, was launched. A mix of communists, anarchists,
and digital pranksters, the Occupy movement cast American society as a
struggle between the “99 percent” and the “one percent.”
Obama and then-House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
embraced the movement — and failed to distance themselves from it even as
it collapsed into
violence, sexual assault, and confrontations with police.
Instead, Obama picked up on Occupy’s
themes and used them to shape his campaign.
In December 2011, Obama gave a speech at
Osawatomie, Kansas — a place steeped in radical
symbolism — at which he doubled down on his left-wing policies. He focused on
the issue of economic inequality, and attacked the idea that the free market
could lift the middle class to prosperity. “This isn’t about class warfare.
This is about the nation’s welfare,” he insisted.
Then, in the spring of 2012, Obama
made a controversial play on race. When a black teen, Trayvon Martin, was
killed in Florida during a scuffle with neighborhood watch volunteer George
Zimmerman, Al Sharprton — who was serving as an informal adviser to Obama at
the time — made the local crime story
into a national racial controversy. Obama, following Sharpton’s lead, weighed
in: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama said at the time.
Poll numbers suggest that race
relations, which had been improving, dropped precipitously after that. But to
Obama, it was worth it: the campaign needed to find a way to motivate minority
voters. (Vice President Joe Biden did his part, telling black voters
that GOP nominee Mitt Romney was “gonna put y’all in chains.”)
Trump is pushing a non-racial,
nationalist message. But if he actually wanted to divide America for political
gain, he could learn from the master.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior
Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social Studies and
Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard. He is a winner of the
2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author
of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter
at @joelpollak.
Lloyd Marcus's
"The Source of BLM's Super-Power" concludes, "But most of all,
BLM's demands are evil. Everyday Americans must say, 'No!' putting
an end to BLM's takeover of America immediately."
Black Lives Matter Has
Super Powers? Here's the Kryptonite.
Lloyd Marcus's "The Source of
BLM's Super-Power" concludes, "But most of all, BLM's demands are
evil. Everyday Americans must say, 'No!' putting an end to BLM's
takeover of America immediately."
This
article gives everybody it reaches the power to send BLM, along with its
political, academic, and corporate supporters, crashing down in total
ruin. This material, all of which readers and other interested
parties can verify independently from the links — you don't have to take my
word for it — also has the potential to demolish the credibility of ActBlue,
the Democrats' key fundraising organization, and the left-leaning Thousand Currents organization. This
material is, to be quite blunt, what Kryptonite is to Superman, Valyrian Steel is to the White Walkers in Game of Thrones,
and a cross is to Dracula. The issue consists simply of BLM's
apparent misuse of 501(c)(3) tax-exempt money to influence the November
election.
An inaccurate story has been
circulating to the effect that Black Lives Matter is working with ActBlue to
launder money that goes to Democratic candidates. Open Secrets explains, "A
donation to BLM through ActBlue goes just to BLM, not any other
group." ActBlue is itself not 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, so there's
nothing more to see here, is there, folks?
There
is actually plenty to see, and the real truth is far worse than the debunked
rumor. While ActBlue is not 501(c)(3) tax-exempt, therefore it has
considerable leeway about what it does with its money, ActBlue
Charities, which accepts donations for the Black Lives
Global Network (the entity that apparently controls Blacklivesmatter.com)
is. Thousand Currents, which is BLM's fiscal sponsor, also is 501(c)(3)
tax-exempt. BLM is openly using its website to campaign against
President Trump. Web pages hosted by ActBlue Charities and Thousand
Currents also attack Trump, so these entities will have trouble saying "we
did not know."
We
need to clarify before we proceed that BLM Global Network is emphatically
not BLM Foundation, the noncontroversial
organization founded by Robert Ray Barnes. BLM Global Network is
represented at BlackLivesMatter.com, the same website linked by Thousand Currents
and which collects donations via ActBlue Charities. The fact that
the first Google result for "Black Lives Matter Foundation" links to
BLM Global Network's About page* suggests to
me that the latter organization is using the name of Barnes's organization to
mislead internet users into visiting BlackLivesMatter.com instead and possibly
donate money under the mistaken belief that they are supporting Barnes's far
less controversial organization. This tells me plenty, and nothing
good, about the ethics of BLM Global Network. For the purpose of
further discussion, "BLM" means BLM Global Network and not BLM
Foundation.
501(c)(3) Money Cannot be Used to Influence an Election
The
Internal Revenue Service says, "All 501(c)(3)
organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on
behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate running for public
office." While the corporations that are supporting BLM can
under some circumstances seek to influence
elections, they need to ask about how they and their brands will look to
customers, employees, and investors when this story about how BLM is using
tax-exempt support goes viral.
BLM Global Network is Openly Campaigning against Trump
501(c)(3)
tax-exempt organizations are permitted to discuss issues of public interest,
but they are not permitted to try to influence any election. BLM is
trying to do exactly that, and it is not even being subtle about it.
1. "Black Lives Matter
Global Network’s Statement Regarding Michael Cohen’s Testimony," hosted at
blacklivesmatter.com, says in part, "[W]e
are reminded that the 2020 election is around the corner. We can
make our voices heard by voting this Administration out of office."
2. "In Response to the
State of the Union" says in part, "Like
a Nazi trying to hide a neck tatoo [sic], Trump shows his true colors whenever
he shifts aimlessly from empty platitude to veiled threat."
3. Other pages on the BLM website
also criticize Trump, but these are not (my opinion) as blatant at those cited above.
4. Here is a CNN video in which BLM
co-founder Patrisse Cullors, who appears to be speaking on behalf of BLM Global
Networks rather than herself, says openly that the group intends to campaign
against Trump and therefore in favor of Biden, even if it doesn't mention
him. "[W]e are going to push for is a move to get Trump out[.]
... Our goal is to get Trump out."
I
infer from this evidence (my opinion) the situation depicted in the figure
below. If this is in fact the situation, then BLM and its
associates, including its supporters in the extreme left wing of the Democratic
Party and also its corporate supporters, are looking at an imminent,
inevitable, and probably catastrophic public relations debacle.
ActBlue Charities' and Thousand Currents' Own Roles
While
there is no proof that ActBlue Charities and Thousand Currents know that BLM
Global Network was using its website, and therefore their support, to influence
the presidential election, they cannot deny knowledge of the material they have
hosted on their own websites. Thousand Currents appears to have
taken down, in the June time frame, pages that disparage Trump. The
most egregious is however still available here, and it says, "If
we stand opposed to this president and administration, it is incumbent upon us
to support and be in solidarity with struggles being led by oppressed
communities[.] ... This administration is a failure."
ActBlue
Charities — and I made sure I selected only pages that cite 501(c)(3)
tax-exempt status as opposed to ActBlue pages that say explicitly that
donations to the listed causes are not tax-deductible — has several pages that
look like problematic uses of tax-exempt money.
1. Bayley's Fundraising Page
for Organizing to Win: Building Racial Justice with White Poor and Working
Class Communities, cites 501(c)(3) status and begins, "If we’re going to
successfully stop Trump, fight global racial inequality ..."
2. Sponsor the #JewishResistance at AIPAC says,
"Those of us opposing Trump are the true majority in this
country." The bottom of the page cites ActBlue Charities and
tax-deductible status.
3. Ru's IfNotNow Fundraising Page says, "Particularly living
under Trump’s presidency, the connection between an unquestioning support for
Israel (without a genuine regard for the real interests of Jews) and white
supremacist values has become crystal clear to the public."
These
are but three of many examples, and you can find more yourself with a Google
search on site:ActBlue.com and "Trump." Be sure, however,
to pay attention to only the pages that say "ActBlue Charities" and
cite 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status at the bottom. ActBlue also has a
non-tax-exempt arm that has far more leeway as to what it can do to influence
an election.
Widespread
publicity for these issues should collapse the Democrat left's center of gravity to deliver an electoral landslide in November. "Woke"
virtue-signaling corporations that have supported BLM Global Network will
scramble desperately to pretend that they never heard of it.
Civis Americanus is the pen name of an American Thinker
contributor who remembers the lessons of history, and wants to ensure that our
country never needs to learn those lessons again the hard way.
*
You may have to copy and paste hyperlinks to blacklivesmatter.com into your browser to get them to
work.
Red Tide Rising
On
September 21, a protest was held in Aurora, Colorado demanding abolishment of
U.S. borders and the Immigration & Customs Enforcement agency. Over
the last three years, a myriad of similar anti-ICE, open-border demonstrations
have been held in cities across America, all of which have been encouraged and
supported, tacitly or otherwise, by the Democratic Party.
One
of several Democratic front groups that participated in the protest calls
itself the Party for Socialism and Liberation/Denver. To make sure its
Marxist ideology doesn’t go unnoticed, the group’s Facebook page reads “Building a Worker’s
Paradise in the Heartland of World Imperialism.” PSL/Denver’s name
includes the word socialism, but the communist flag flown at its Aurora
protest shows that to this profoundly anti-American group, socialism and
communism are heads of the same snake.
The
open borders demonstration was also attended by members of Rocky Mountain
Antifa and Denver Communists, two other openly Marxist Democrat front groups.
In this video, a member of Denver
Communists confirms that the protestors are demanding elimination of U.S.
borders and an end to enforcement of U.S. immigration law. An image on the group’s Facebook
demanding
no borders and no nations.
A
borderless world without nations represents the culmination of the communist
dream of a world united under the banner of the hammer and sickle. For
that dream to be realized, America’s sovereignty must be yielded to an
international governing body run by the UN, a one-world globalist organization
run by an international assortment of socialists-cum-communists. Those
who call for a borderless world with no nations are effectively calling for a
permanent end to the United States in favor of a “new world order,” a world
where Americans would be indoctrinated to no longer see themselves as citizens
of their country, but as Citizens of the World.
Occupy
Denver is another anti-capitalist group that showed up for the demonstration in
Aurora. Hundreds of Occupy affiliates are active in cities, towns and
campuses across America. Like other Democrat identity politics groups,
Occupy affiliates are openly pro-communist -- Occupy Denver’s Facebook profile picture contains an image
of “the Raised Fist,” one of communism’s most recognizable call to arms.
Like other Democrat front groups, Occupy Denver helps the Democratic
Party advance its hostility toward the police by mocking and ridiculing law
enforcement officers, as shown in this photo on the group’s
Facebook. Another photo on the group’s
Facebook supports the Democrats’ class warfare election strategy with an ‘us
vs. them’ propaganda graphic declaring that the poor in America are exploited
victims of oppression, who therefore have a right to “destroy the system,” by
violence if necessary. Victim vs. oppressor ideology is the means of achieving
political power outlined in The Communist Manifesto.
The
ties that bind the modern Democratic Party to pro-communist groups and
organizations are unmistakable. Nowhere is that more evident than its
ties to the Occupy movement. At an Aug. 19, 2012 pre-rally
“People’s Assembly” meeting in the nation’s capitol, former labor boss/lifelong
Democrat Mike Golash, leader of Occupy DC and a member of the openly-communist
Progressive Labor Party, left no doubt about the intent of the Occupy movement
when he was caught on video telling student
occupiers “Our goal is to make revolution in the United States,
overthrow the capitalist system and build communism in America.”
Another
prominent Democrat who supports the
room
Barack Obama launched his political career.
And,
when Occupy Wall Street protests burst on the scene in 2011, the two most high
profile Democrats in America -- President Obama (“We are on their side”) and Speaker Nancy
Pelosi (“God bless them”) -- enthusiastically
supported the 99% vs. the 1%, victim vs. oppressor protests, as did virtually
every other high level official in the Democratic Party.
The
Aurora protestors who demanded no borders and no nations -- and millions more
like them who share their borderless world ideology -- have three things in
common:
●
They all are Americans who harbor deep contempt for their country.
●
They all are communist revolutionaries committed to overthrowing America’s
two-party capitalist system by any means necessary.
●
They all support and are supported by the modern Democratic Party, a
once-patriotic party that has quietly defected to the side of the hammer and
sickle.
The
choice you face in 2020
Overwhelming
evidence shows that the red tide of communism is rising in America, and rapidly
so. Whether it succeeds in upending our constitutional republic will be
determined by the next national elections.
An electrical engineering graduate of Georgia Tech and now
retired, John Eidson is a freelance writer in Atlanta.
CAN YOU THINK OF EVEN ON THING BARACK OBAMA DID FOR
BLACK AMERICA EVEN AS HE OPERATED 'LA RAZA' OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE?
Obama Still Leading from
Behind
Encouraging rioters and
protecting cop killer Joanne Chesimard, aka Assata Shakur, icon of Black Lives
Matter.
Wed Jun 10, 2020
“Black people have a reason to
hate. That’s how it is. For your sake, I wish it were otherwise, but it’s not
so. So you might as well get used to it.”
That sounds like a Black Lives
Matter speech but it’s actually the character identified only as “Frank”
in Dreams from My
Father. Young Barry’s grandmother had been frightened by a large
black man, and as Frank explained, “your grandma’s right to be scared.” Back in
the day, Frank explains, he would have to step off the sidewalk to let white
folks pass. Barry’s grandfather probably never told him about that because it
“makes him uncomfortable.”
Dreams from My Father is a fictitious account, as official biographer David Garrow
explained in the 2017 Rising
Star: The Making of Barack Obama, but it does contain real events
and characters. Garrow revealed what the “composite character” author had
already acknowledged, that “Frank” is Frank Marshall Davis, an African American
Communist so dedicated to the all-white Soviet dictatorship he landed on the
FBI’s security index.
Before Barry goes off to
college, Frank warns, “they’ll train you so good, you’ll start believing what
they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that shit.”
According to Frank, if the student should want to start “running things,” then
whites will “yank on your chain and let you know that you may be a
well-trained, well-paid nigger, but you’re a nigger just the same.”
In Chicago, the student meets
the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, “a dynamic young pastor. His message seemed to appeal
to young people like me.” As the Rev. Wright explains, “life’s not safe for a
black man in this country, Barack. Never has been. Probably never will be.” That
too sounds like the creed of Black Lives Matter, as David Horowitz explains,
created in 2013 by self-styled Marxist-Leninist revolutionaries “who selected
as their movement icon convicted cop-killer and Black Liberation Army member
Assata Shakur.”
In February 2015, at the height
of their riots and incitements, President Obama duly invited BLM to the White
House. They were better organized than he had been, the president said, and “I
am confident that they are going to take America to new heights.”
After the death of George Floyd
at the hands of a Minneapolis cop, Black Lives Matter headed a nationwide spree
of arson, looting and violence that claimed the lives of police officers,
including African Americans such as David Dorn. In a virtual town hall on the
matter, former president Obama named none of the victims and failed to condemn
any of the violence and destruction. On the other hand, he invoked
“institutionalized racism,” the “original sin” of our society.
The task of the protesters,
Obama said, is to make such sinners feel “uncomfortable,” the same term Frank
used back in the day, and “seize the moment.” That leaves plenty to ponder for
people of no color and African Americans alike.
Born in 1905, Frank Marshall
Davis studied journalism at Friends College then transferred to Kansas State.
In Livin’ the Blues: Memoirs of a Black Journalist and Poet (University of Wisconsin Press, 1992), Davis proudly notes
his inclusion in Who’s
Who in the Midwest and Who’s
Who in America. So in Frank’s day, there was plenty of opportunity
for blacks in America, and things were bound to get better.
Frank warned that college is
“an advanced degree in compromise” and the Rev. Wright said “life’s not safe
for a black man in this country,” and never would be. Yet somehow the
Hawaiian-born student formerly known as Barry Soetoro earned a law degree at
Harvard, became a U.S. Senator, and in 2008 was elected president of the United
States, the most powerful person in the world.
In 2015, during his second
term, the composite character president brought Black Lives Matter to the White
House. As the current insurrection surges, the former president mounts the
bully pulpit, invoking the “original sin” of institutionalized racism. He
exhorts the protesters to “make people uncomfortable” and “seize the moment.”
Leading the charge is Black
Lives Matter, whose icon is Assata Shakur also known as Joanne Chesimard.
In 1973, Chesimard shot and killed New Jersey state trooper Werner Foerster in
execution style, at point-blank range. The convicted murderer escaped prison
and fled to Cuba, an all-white Stalinist dictatorship leading the world in
black political prisoners.
In 2013, on the 40th
anniversary of Foerster’s murder, Joanne Chesimard became the first woman to
make the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist list. While
living in Cuba, FBI agent Aaron Ford said, she “continues to promote her
terrorist ideology. She provides anti-U.S.-government speeches, espousing
the Black Liberation Army’s message of revolution and terrorism.”
In March of 2016, President
Obama visited Cuba to push for an end
to the U.S. trade embargo. He did so with no conditions on the Castro regime
such as free elections, release of political prisoners, and no demand for the
return of Joanne Chesimard, also known as Assata Shakur. When her
protector Fidel Castro died in November, 2016, Obama recalled “the countless
ways in which Fidel Castro altered the course of individual lives,” and hailed
“the enormous impact of this singular figure.”
In 2016, the Stalinist’s life
mattered. In 2020, the former president is still leading from behind as rioters
loot, burn, and kill police officers in the style of Joanne Chesimard, an
inspiration to violent leftists of all skin shades.
Weather Underground terrorists
Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert named their son Chesa, after Joanne Chesimard, and the child was adopted by Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.
Chesa Boudin is now district attorney of San Francisco.
“It’s time for radical change
to how we envision justice,” the victorious Boudin said last year. “I’m
humbled to be a part of this movement that is unwavering in its demand for
transformation.”
Michelle Obama castigates whites for ‘running from us’
Speaking at an event in Chicago called the “Obama Foundation
Summit” (were any heads of state present?), Michelle Obama let slip her
resentment of white people. The grudge goes back to her childhood, and she does
not seem to see much progress in the behavior she attributes to
Caucasian-Americans. Fox News reports what the New
York Times doesn’t:
White Americans are “still running” elsewhere when minorities
and immigrants move into their communities, Michelle
Obama observed Tuesday.
(snip)
In a sit-down interview with journalist Isabel Wilkerson, in which
Obama was accompanied by her brother, Craig Robinson, an executive with the
NBA’s New York Knicks, Obama described when she first became conscious of
what’s been called “white flight.”
We were doing everything we were supposed to do – and better,”
Obama said of her family, recalling when they got a new address on Chicago’s
South Side. “But when we moved in, white families moved out.
“I want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us,”
she continued, according to the
Chicago Sun-Times. “And you’re still
running.”
This is remarkably un-self-aware, considering that the Obamas
currently reside in Kalorama and Martha’s Vineyard. How many blacks live near
their two mansions?
“I can’t make people not afraid of black people,” she said, according
to The Hill. “I don’t know what’s going
on. I can’t explain what’s happening in your head."
Maybe what’s going on in the heads of white people is the same as
what was going on in Jesse
Jackson’s head when he said:
“There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than
to walk down the street and hear footsteps... then turn around and see somebody
white and feel relieved.”
It would be wonderful if black crime rates were similar to those
of whites and Asians, but they aren’t. That’s is why many minorities flee from ghettos as soon as they
are financially able – a group that includes Barack and Michelle Obama.
Mrs. Obama is stoking racial resentment with her remarks, an
emotion that the Democrats use as part of their electoral strategy to drive
black turnout.
At least her statement castigating whites is consistent with her
oft-expressed position that she has “zero interest” in running for president.
Here is video of her remarks on race:
Hat tip: Ed Lasky
"That phase of the takeover was started in
2008 by President Barack Obama. Throughout his eight years in
office, Obama practiced divisiveness and hammered away at the Second Amendment
while pouring gallons of fuel on the fire of the "Black Lives Matter"
lie. His administration was rampant with corruption, pushing the
envelope with every new scandal." RICK HAYES
October
3, 2019
The Political Civil War is real
The
American Political Civil War, which began in November 2016, has so far
witnessed leftist Democrats initiating a series of unsuccessful offensive
maneuvers against the president and his allies. The unrelenting
Russian collusion bombardment did not produce the shock and awe promised by
leftist operatives such as Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy
Pelosi. And so a new front was opened up against the president,
having the appearance of impeachment proceedings that dealt with a routine
phone call from President Trump to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Sometimes
aggression must be met head on, with resolve to stop it in its
tracks. History reviles Neville Chamberlain not because he was
unsuccessful in halting German expansion, but because he couldn't identify or
didn't want to acknowledge the clear evidence of imminent war.
Chamberlain's
self-deception and fear helped pave the way in allowing an aggressor to gather
strength and strike when he had amassed enough power. In the same
way, it was the self-deception and cowardice of Republican members of Congress
that allowed the Democrat impeachment machine to gain control of the House
during the midterm elections.
But
the leftist Democratic Party has taken a different approach toward total
political and social conquest. Unlike the German war machine that
promised peace but delivered war, leftist Democrats do not promise any
compromises. Instead, they are openly mobilizing for political war
and are prepared to deliver on that threat, no matter the cost to the country.
And
to be clear, it will continue to be an all-out, extremely aggressive assault on
the president and any American who wants nothing more than to live in peace and
raise a family. To pretend that what is happening today is merely
dirty politics as usual would be the equivalent of British citizens identifying
descending V-1 rockets in the battle of Britain as no more than pesky mosquitoes.
It
is, thus far, a bloodless, political civil war to change America
forever. And it has already seen a coup attempt against the
president by the Left that desires a winner-take-all conclusion. And
because Leftist Democrats never conceived that anyone other than a person they
selected would become president, the rules, laws, and language must change and
contort to fit their agenda so they can finally seize power. Once in
power, the rules and laws dictated by the Left will become unrecognizable, and
there will be no bridge to cross to get back to the Constitution.
Politically
speaking, these leftist radicals have proven that they will attack all those
who want to remain living in a Republic. As in every past revolution
into socialism, the socialist victors demand complete obedience from the
conquered.
In
their own words, leftist Democrats confirm that they are counting on a
misinformed public in order to gain power. Take, as an example, the
statement made by Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare, where he brags
to a group of people how in order to pass Obamacare he relied on "the
stupidity of the American voter." Although Gruber doesn't
explain how the American voter becomes so "stupid," the evidence is
clear that the corrupt, indoctrinating media play a crucial
role. They dole out misinformation and deceit, as does the leftist
education system.
There
are no more pretenses, as the corrupt major media have all but announced their
alliance with the far left's aggressive goals. An article in the
October 2018 edition of Investor's
Business Daily points out this blatant one-sided absurdity that passes for
today's media:
To say that the big networks haven't exactly had
a love affair with Donald Trump, as they did with President Obama, is an
understatement. A new survey shows that not only is coverage of Trump
overwhelmingly negative, but the President's biggest accomplishment — the
roaring economy — gets almost no attention.
The
article goes on to say Trump receives 92% negative coverage and that the Media
Research Center watched network TV for four months and found that the coverage
surrounding Trump's economic boom was only 0.7% of the entire coverage.
It
cannot be overstated that for America to "change," there had to be a
push to revoke some or all of the Bill of Rights. That phase of the
takeover was started in 2008 by President Barack Obama. Throughout
his eight years in office, Obama practiced divisiveness and hammered away at
the Second Amendment while pouring gallons of fuel on the fire of the
"Black Lives Matter" lie. His administration was rampant
with corruption, pushing the envelope with every new scandal. Only
because outsider citizen Trump became President Trump do we now know that there
was no chance that justice would have ever been served for the victims of the
scandals of Benghazi, the IRS, and Fast and Furious while Obama was in
office. Just like the leftist Democrats of today, Obama was protected
by America's version of Pravda.
The
ongoing coup attempt against President Trump and his administration will
continue. The American people will get deluged with fake news and
lies from hostile media sources. There still exists a sliver of hope
in the name of William Barr. But even Barr holding a winning hand is
not enough to turn the tide against the waves of corruption slamming into
America. It will also take the selfless efforts of the average
American who demands liberty. It will take the courage and grit of
ordinary men and women to secure a victory — not just for the president, but
for America's bright future and the joy of living in ultimate freedom.
Mecha's (M.E.Ch.A.) own slogan reads, "For the race
everything. For those outside the race, nothing." (CALIFORNIA’S ATTORNEY
GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA IS A MEMBER OF THE MEX FASCIST SEPARATIST MOVEMENT OF
M.E.Ch.A.)
LA
RAZA: The Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “THE RACE” and the Reconquista and
surrender of America to NARCOMEX
VIVA
LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
The comparison to the Nazi
Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino
Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call
for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the
re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is
the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf
Hitler planned to called his utopia Germania).
"Despite the fact that the majority
of documented hispanics oppose illegal immigration, as do the majority of
Americans, Aztlan and La Raza race hate groups have become the
self-appointed voice for a separatist movement that threatens a violent
overthrow of the Constitutional system and a barbaric program of ethnic
cleansing. This is held up by the media as 'diversity' and to vociferously oppose
it is scorned as racism."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are
practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
"We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona,
New Mexico and Texas into the country of
Mexico."
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services
to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in California." --- Art Torres, Chairman of the California
Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA RAZA SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack
Obama and LA RAZA.
"The American Southwest
seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a
single shot." --- Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that
reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican
government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
“Make no mistake about it: the Latino community holds this election in your
hands. Some of the closest contests this November will be in states like
Florida, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico -- states with large Latino
populations.”
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
“I know how powerful this community is. Just think how powerful you could
be on November 4th if you translate your numbers into votes.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
BARACK OBAMA
SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF BARACK OBAMA IS A PRO-MUSLIM, ANTI-AMERICAN,
ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-JEWISH DICTATOR IN THE MAKING FOR GLOBALIST BANKSTERS AND
BILLIONAIRES.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future
electability), he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to
him in Chicago a church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American,
anti-white, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years,
Obama and Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth
he shoveled out from the trough at his altar.
The Crisis Obama Let Go to Waste
Barack
Obama's legacy is nothing if not consequential. In his decades as
"community organizer" among Chicago's poorest, most desperate
neighborhoods, he did nothing other than perpetuate complete dependence on Big
Brother. His Affordable Care Act, and its accompanying criminal penalties
for not engaging in commerce, scythed a mile-wide berth into
the already frayed concept of a citizenry living free from government coercion.
More ominously, Obama was able to entwine his instinctive Marxism with
a vision for America's path forward in a way his predecessors had been unable
to.
The
singular cunning of Obama was his success in realigning the "victim"
hierarchy almost completely from class to race. Free citizens in a market
society can climb or descend the social ladder, but race remains a constant
throughout. Race is our most recognizable difference, no matter its
superficial nature. In the deepest recesses of our prejudices, race is
pure tribalism. And in the darkest hours of human history, at our most
trying moments, and during our most vicious wars, people of all tribes have
taken refuge not within their class, but within their race or ethnicity.
The examples of Nazi Germany, of Bosnia, of Rwanda, and of the Armenians
in Turkey are but a few examples of the horrors lifelong friends and neighbors
of the same class can inflict on one another in the name of racial identity
politics.
This
isn't to say Marxism hasn't been peddled before under the guise of racial
identity grievance. Indeed, Lenin himself was able to provoke satellite
regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan to revolt from czarist Russia in the name
of ethnic separatism. In the United States, it has been tried repeatedly
since the 1960s. But as our nation's first (half) black president, Obama
was able sow division with absolute authority, and with minimal criticism by a
political class that either openly supported his aims or was petrified of
soliciting unsubstantiated accusations of racism.
And
sow division he did, with every chance he got.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future electability),
he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to him in Chicago a
church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American, anti-white, and
anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years, Obama and
Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth he
shoveled out from the trough at his altar. When asked to justify
his close association with this shameless bigot, Obama shrugged off such
concerns, comparing Wright to "an
old uncle who sometimes will say things that I don't agree with."
Obama distanced himself from Wright only when it started affecting his poll
numbers.
When
armed Black Panthers were caught threatening voters outside a Philadelphia
polling station in 2008, the Department of Justice under the Bush
administration charged (and convicted) them with violations of the Voting
Rights Act. Once in office, Obama had political appointees in the
DOJ dismiss the charges.
When
Cambridge Police (both white and black, not that it should matter) arrested his
black friend Henry Gates for disorderly conduct, Obama, after admitting that he
didn't know all the facts, stated that the police
"acted stupidly."
After
Trayvon Martin was shot by Afro-Peruvian (AKA "white Hispanic")
George Zimmerman, Obama intoned, "If I had a son,
he'd look like Trayvon." This implies that Martin was shot because
he was black, and not because he was repeatedly pummeling Zimmerman's head into
the pavement. Even Eric Holder's investigation concluded otherwise.
After
black nationalist Xavier Micah Johnson opened fire and murdered five Dallas
police officers in 2016 (as they protected a Black Lives Matter march), Obama
gave a eulogy at their funeral. The eulogy itself stands as perhaps one
of the most despicable moments of the Obama presidency. He used the
podium to equate the murder of the
Dallas police officers with the recent shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando
Castile (both of which were investigated and found justifiable, and neither man
was "unfairly targeted" because he was black, as Obama asserted).
It
was a speech as deft as it was cynical. Reading through the text, one
realizes more clearly the manipulation taking place that, when spoken, is less
detectable. He subtly but unmistakably steers the speech from a tribute
to the murdered officers to a damning indictment of our alleged systemic
racism, coupled with a defense of the paranoid style of the Black Lives Matter
movement. By the end of the speech, Obama had skillfully twisted the
events to the point where theoretical, faceless white racism was to blame for
the actual, documented racism of Xavier Johnson.
One
wonders if, had he attended Sterling's funeral, he would have lectured the
audience about murdered police.
At
this point, I must interject a side note regarding the aforementioned
shootings. Philando Castile was shot in a horrible case of mistaken identity. He closely
matched the description of a suspect from a recent armed robbery, and the
officer thought he was reaching for a gun he admitted to having. Alton
Sterling (who had a long arrest record that included
battery, burglary, and weapons charges) was shot because he was physically
fighting with police, despite being tasered several times. Police shot
him when he reached for the loaded .38 caliber revolver in his pants. His
shooting was completely warranted, and Baton Rouge is a safer place without
him. Neither the tragic shooting of Castile nor the justified shooting of
Sterling can in any reasonable way be attributed to racism, nor can they be
remotely likened to the premeditated slaughter of the five Dallas
officers. But such are the dots that Obama connected to hustle his race
narrative.
Obama
is notoriously thin-skinned to criticism, or to the suggestion that someone,
somewhere, might be smarter than he. This is the guy who claimed, with a straight face,
that he was a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, more knowledgeable
about policy than his policy directors, and a better political director than
his political director. Still, one assumes he was adroit enough to
recognize that objections to his policies, or questions of their
constitutionality, were not the default reactions of repressed racism. If
he had thought they were, he would have said so. On a fundamental
level, Obama understands that America is not the systemically racist cesspool
he allowed it to be portrayed as under his watch. Yet he was
Machiavellian enough to let this yarn spin itself for the purpose of political
advantage.
Obama
also understood the political pitfalls inherent in hiding behind the race card
in efforts to deflect policy debates he could not win. So he did one
better. He let his media sycophants do it for him. For the duration
of his presidency and beyond, these shrieking curs claw the flesh off their
faces at the slightest hint of criticism of Obama, his policies, or his style
of governance. I am unaware of a single instance in which he publicly
censured his groupies for their utter lack of nuance.
Therein
lies the biggest tragedy of Obama's legacy. As a biracial president, he
had a foot in both black and white America. He was uniquely positioned to
use this to the advantage of the entire country, to serve as a bridge of
healing and progress between races who have butted heads for far too long.
Instead, for eight continuous years, he chose to do the exact
opposite. He entrenched identity politics as deeply as he could, ripping
open wounds in the process, and divided this great nation perhaps past the
point of no return. He did this to spread a thoroughly debunked ideology,
the achievability of which his ego will never allow him to
admit he was mistaken about.
In
a 2008 speech in which Obama attempted to justify Jeremiah Wright's irrational
hatred, he said, "At times, that
anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to
make up for a politician's own failings." Never before has a poker
player so inadvertently revealed his own hand. When Obama spoke those
words, he was no doubt doing what he does best: thinking of himself.
Agenda of Black Lives Matter Is Far
Different From Slogan
Many see the slogan Black Lives
Matter as a plea to secure the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness for all Americans, especially historically wronged African Americans.
They add the BLM hashtag to their social media profiles, carry BLM signs at
protests, and make financial donations.
Tragically,
when they do donate, they are likely to bankroll a number of radical
organizations, founded by committed Marxists whose goals aren’t
to make the American dream a reality for everyone—but to transform America
completely.
This might be unknown to some of the world’s best-known companies, which have jumped on the BLM bandwagon.
Brands like Airbnb and Spanx have promised direct donations.
True,
others like Nike and Netflix have shrewdly channeled their donations elsewhere,
like the NAACP and other organizations that have led the struggle for civil
rights for decades. These companies are likely aware of BLM’s extreme agenda
and recoil from bankrolling destructive ideas. But it requires sleuthing to
learn this.
Companies
that don’t do this hard work are providing air cover for a destructive movement
and compelling their employees, shareowners, and customers to endorse the same.
Just ask BLM leaders Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and
Opal Tometi.
In
a revealing 2015 interview, Cullors said, “Myself and Alicia in particular are
trained organizers. We are trained Marxists.”
That
same year, Tometi was hobnobbing with Venezuela’s Marxist dictator Nicolás
Maduro, of whose regime she wrote: “In these last 17 years, we have witnessed
the Bolivarian Revolution champion participatory democracy and construct a
fair, transparent election system recognized as among the best in the world.”
Millions
of Venezuelans suffering under Maduro’s murderous misrule presumably couldn’t
be reached for comment.
Visit the
Black Lives Matter website, and the first frame you get is a large crowd with
fists raised and the slogan “Now We Transform.” Read the list of demands, and you get a sense of how
deep a transformation they seek.
One
proclaims: “We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear-family-structure
requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that
collectively care for one another.”
A
partner organization, the Movement for Black Lives, or M4BL, calls for
abolishing all police and all prisons. It also calls for a “progressive
restructuring of tax codes at the local, state and federal levels to ensure a
radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth.”
Another
M4BL demand is “the retroactive decriminalization, immediate release and record
expungement of all drug-related offenses and prostitution and reparations for
the devastating impact of the ‘war on drugs’ and criminalization of
prostitution.”
This agenda isn’t what most people signed up for when
they bought their Spanx or registered for Airbnb. Nor is it what most people
understood when they expressed sympathy with the slogan that Black Lives
Matter.
Garza
first coined the phrase in a July 14, 2013, Facebook post the day George
Zimmerman was acquitted of murdering Trayvon Martin. Her friend Cullors put the
hashtag in front and joined the words, so it could travel through social media.
Tometi thought of creating an actual digital platform, BlackLivesMatter.com.
The
group became a self-styled global network in 2014 and a “fiscally sponsored
project” of a separate progressive nonprofit in 2016, according to Robert
Stilson of the Capital Research Center. This evolution has helped embolden an
agenda vastly more ambitious than just #DefundthePolice.
The
goals of the Black Lives Matter organization go far beyond what most people
think. But they are hiding in plain sight, there for the world to see, if only
we read beyond the slogans and the innocuous-sounding media accounts of the
movement.
The
group’s radical Marxist agenda would supplant the basic building
block of society—the family—with the state and destroy the economic system that
has lifted more people from poverty than any other. Black lives, and all lives,
would be harmed.
Theirs
is a blueprint for misery, not justice. It must be rejected.
No comments:
Post a Comment