Saturday, July 2, 2022

JOE BIDEN'S 'FOREVER WARS' AND WIDE OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX - Who will pay for Biden’s new “forever war”?

 VIDEO: JOE BIDEN'S ORCHESTRATED INVASION.

Gov. Abbott: This will end with a new president


Who will pay for Biden’s new “forever war”?

This week, the United States and its NATO allies pledged to increase their troop presence in Europe seven-fold in order to prepare for what they called “warfighting against nuclear-armed peer-competitors”–that is, war against Russia and China.

The NATO members declared that they would increase their “high readiness forces” from 40,000 to 300,000. Biden announced the US would send another 20,000 troops to Europe amid the escalating war with Russia, accompanied by the permanent deployment of guided missile destroyers and F-35 aircraft.

Biden, flanked by Gen. Andrew Poppas and Gen. Mark Milley, in 2016. (AP Photo/Steve Ruark)

The US, which spends more on its armed forces than the next 10 largest militaries combined, has increased its military spending for six years in a row. Biden’s military budget for 2023, already the largest on record, was boosted another 6 percent by a vote in the Senate Armed Services Committee, bringing the total to $858 billion.

Since the start of the Biden administration, the US has pledged over $50 billion in military and economic aid to Ukraine. Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that the country needs at least $60 billion a year in aid to continue its war effort, a figure equivalent to nearly half of Ukraine’s pre-war economic output.

Last year, when Biden announced the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, he said, “We’ve been a nation too long at war. If you’re 20 years old today, you have never known an America at peace.” He declared, “It’s time to end the forever war.”

Now Biden is committing the American population to a new perpetual war, asserting that there are no limits to the resources that must be devoted to it.

Asked Thursday at a news conference at the NATO Summit in Madrid to “explain what that means to the American people” and whether he was pledging “indefinite support from the United States for Ukraine,” Biden said “We are going to support Ukraine as long as it takes.”

Another reporter asked about the “high price of gasoline in the United States and around the world,” inquiring, “How long is it fair to expect American drivers and drivers around the world to pay that premium for this war?”

Biden reiterated, “As long as it takes.”

No one thought to ask Biden an obvious question: How long will “it” take? What will be the cost of this open-ended war, and what will be the consequences?

The United States is spearheading a global conflict that threatens the lives of millions of people and, if it develops into a nuclear exchange, the fate of humanity itself.

Can anyone imagine, moreover, that a war against Russia, the aim of which is to overthrow the government of the world’s largest country, coupled with a war against China, the world’s second-largest economy, can be achieved without totally impoverishing the American population?

The social and economic consequences of the militarization of society pledged by the US and its allies at the NATO summit are incalculable. In every country, government spending on public health and social infrastructure is to be gutted to free up resources for the war effort. 

The costs of the war are to be imposed onto the working class through the dismantling of social programs and the demand that workers accept a reduction in real wages in the name of the “national interest.”

The eruption of the war has been accompanied by the total abandonment of any efforts to stop the spread of COVID-19. According to US government estimates, there will be 100 million new cases of COVID-19 this fall, more than the number of all COVID-19 cases previously reported to date. And Congress has refused to pass any additional pandemic funding, meaning that uninsured people will be forced to pay for COVID-19 vaccines, testing and treatments out of pocket.

This week, New York City announced that it is slashing public school funding by $215 million in what is expected to be a surge in austerity measures around the country.

Already, the war has fueled demands for slashing “entitlement” spending. “NATO Needs More Guns and Less Butter,” Glenn Hubbard, the former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year, demanding cuts in spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. “Spending offsets to accommodate higher defense spending would surely require slowing the growth in social insurance spending,” he wrote.

While out-of-control military spending against the backdrop of decades of Wall Street bailouts has contributed to the inflationary crisis, the US political establishment is seeking to impose the full burden of the crisis on the working class. The Federal Reserve has initiated a program of seeking to deliberately increase unemployment by raising interest rates, hoping to restore “balance” to the labor market by throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work.

The intensification of the war will take place against a tidal wave of layoffs, beginning in the technology and real estate sector and spreading through the auto industry. According to one tracker, there were 26,000 layoffs in the technology sector alone last month, up from 20,000 the month before.

The global war being initiated by the Biden administration is at one and the same time a war against the working class of the United States. Through war, the US ruling class is seeking to at once divert internal tensions outward through the creation of an external enemy and build up the forces of repression to crush strikes and social struggles.

Biden’s commitment to unlimited American involvement in the war with Russia enjoys the support of the entire US political establishment. The outcome of the NATO summit was hailed by the editorial boards of the major US newspapers, from the Democratic-aligned New York Times and Washington Post to the Republican-aligned Wall Street Journal.

“Whatever else happens in President Biden’s tenure, and no matter how long that tenure lasts, the events this week in Europe will ensure that his presidency is a consequential one,” the Post proclaimed.

Not a single Democratic member of Congress has criticized Biden’s pledge of endless resources for the war effort.

Despite the unending barrage of propaganda aimed at exciting public hated of Russia and China, the war in Ukraine is broadly unpopular. In a YouGov poll published this week, 40 percent of respondents said the US should be “less militarily engaged in conflicts around the world,” compared with 12 percent who said it should be more engaged.

Asked what Biden’s top priority should be, 38 percent said the White House should seek to address the surging cost of living, compared with 8 percent who said the US should “ensure a defeat of Russia in Ukraine.”

Forty-six percent of respondents said they “oppose the United States military becoming directly involved in combat in the Russia-Ukraine war,” compared to just 23 percent who support such a move.

The American population has not forgotten the crimes carried out by American imperialism against the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen and dozens of other countries subjected to US destabilization campaigns, proxy wars and murderous economic sanctions.

There does not, outside of the International Committee of the Fourth International, exist any organized political opposition to the war plans of US imperialism. The social basis for the building of a new anti-war movement is the working class. Just as imperialist war abroad is at the same time a war on the working class at home, so too the fight against war is at the same time a fight of the working class against inequality, exploitation and the capitalist profit system.

TX Dem Sheriff: Law Enforcement Leaders See ‘Complete Absence from Washington’ on Border

1:22

On Friday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Jose Diaz-Balart Reports,” Bexar County, TX Sheriff Javier Salazar (D) stated that in his talks with other law enforcement leaders in Texas, “the perception is that there’s been a complete absence from Washington, DC” on immigration and the border and called for help from President Joe Biden and asked Biden to communicate with law enforcement in the state.

Salazar said, “At present, we’ve got a governor that’s using this as a campaign stunt.”

He added, “Mr. President, we need your help. With all due respect, the perception here, what I’ve seen in talking to other law enforcement leaders in my precious state of Texas is the perception is that there’s been a complete absence from Washington, DC. Now, I know that you’ve got a whole world to protect and serve. However, here down in Texas, we need your help. We need you here to talk to us and see if we can be part of the solution. Right now, what we’re doing is we’re allowing the state government to control that narrative, and maybe they’re trying their best. I don’t know. But, at this point, the results that we’re seeing are just not satisfactory.”

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

Exclusive: 1,700 Migrants Arrested in Texas Border Town in One Day

Eagle Pass Texas
Randy Clark/Breitbart Texas
2:41

Eagle Pass, Texas — Del Rio Sector Border Patrol agents apprehended 1,772 migrants after they crossed the Rio Grande in a single day in Eagle Pass. The steady stream of migrants apprehended after crossing the river included one group numbering more than 500. On Thursday, the number of apprehensions exceeded any other single day total for the city according to the source.

A source operating under the umbrella of U.S. Customs and Border Protection told Breitbart Texas that Del Rio Sector agents lead the nation of late in apprehensions. The source said the increase in apprehensions is forcing the agency to deal with constant overcrowding at processing facilities. More than 2,000 migrants were arrested on Thursday throughout the Del Rio Sector — most chose to enter the United States in Eagle Pass.

The task of transporting the migrants from the apprehension point near the Rio Grande to a soft-sided processing center is stretching transportation resources to the breaking point. In addition, the source says the need to provide medical and humanitarian care along with processing the migrants mean most Border Patrol agents are not on routine field patrol, leaving the border wide open.

The CBP source, who is not authorized to speak to the media, told Breitbart Texas most of the encounters on Thursday were single adult migrants. In the largest group of migrants arrested, more than 400 of the 528 members of the migrant group were single adult males and females. The group was comprised of migrants from 14 different countries.

Nearly half of the group consisted of Venezuelan nationals. More than 150 migrants were from Cuba. More than 100 members of the groups were from Colombia, Peru, Nicaragua, Iran, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Chile, Honduras, Guatemala, Panama, and Mexico.

The source says the Border Patrol is seeing a flow of migrants from all parts of the world and has apprehended migrants in Eagle Pass from more than 100 unique countries this year. Arresting migrants from dozens of different countries each day has been the norm for the agency, according to the source.

Randy Clark is a 32-year veteran of the United States Border Patrol.  Prior to his retirement, he served as the Division Chief for Law Enforcement Operations, directing operations for nine Border Patrol Stations within the Del Rio, Texas, Sector. Follow him on Twitter @RandyClarkBBTX.

Convicted Illegal Alien Serial Killer, Accused of Killing 25 Elderly Americans, Indicted for Four Murders

Dallas County Sheriff's Office via AP
DCSO
4:33

Billy Chemirmir, a 48-year-old illegal alien accused of murdering 25 elderly Americans and convicted of murder this year, has been indicted for the murders of four of those Americans in Collin County, Texas.

In April, Chemirmir was convicted of murdering 81-year-old Lu Thi Harris, just one of his alleged 25 elderly victims. He is accused of murdering the victims, stealing from them, and then selling their belongings online from April 2016 to April 2018.

Chemirmir is believed to be Texas’s deadliest serial killer.

Now, Chemirmir has been indicted by Collin County prosecutors for four of the murders. The victims in the murder indictments are 90-year-old Marilyn Bixler, 79-year-old Diane Delahunty, 93-year-old Mamie Miya, and 82-year-old Helen Lee.

Lee was previously unnamed in the case.

“These indictments should serve as a reminder that every victim of a violent crime deserves to have their case investigated and prosecuted, and Collin County law enforcement and prosecutors will work every day to hold violent offenders accountable,” Collin County District Attorney Greg Willis said in a statement.

The Angel Families released a statement, writing:

We the families and loved ones of Marilyn Bixler, Diane Delahunty, Helen Lee, and Mamie Miya are grateful to hear of today’s four additional capital murder indictments. These indictments are another step in holding Billy Chemirmir accountable for the full extent of his horrible crimes. We’d like to thank police and prosecutors for listening to us, and for their continued efforts to see that justice is done for all the victims and their loved ones. [Emphasis added]

Chemirmir was previously indicted in Collin County on five counts of capital murder and two counts of attempted capital murder. The cases are pending and Chemirmir is set for trial in October.

Chemirmir’s conviction in April came after his initial murder trial in Dallas County was declared a mistrial when one juror on the 12-member jury ensured that the case’s verdict remained “hopelessly deadlocked,” according to the jury.

Aside from Harris, Chemirmir has been linked to 24 other victims:

  • 83-year-old Leah Corken
  • 82-year-old Juanita Purdy
  • 88-year-old Mary Brooks
  • 84-year-old Minnie Campbell
  • 82-year-old Ann Conklin
  • 75-year-old Rosemary Curtis
  • 85-year-old Norma French
  • 92-year-old Doris Gleason
  • 81-year-old Carolyn MacPhee
  • 81-year-old Miriam Nelson
  • 91-year-old Phyllis Payne
  • 94-year-old Phoebe Perry
  • 80-year-old Martha Williams
  • 82-year-old Joyce Abramowitz
  • 87-year-old Glenna Day
  • 89-year-old Solomon Spring
  • 90-year-old Doris Wasserman
  • 86-year-old Margaret White
  • 79-year-old Diana Delahunty
  • 93-year-old Mamie Dell Miya
  • 86-year-old Catherine Probst Sinclair
  • 90-year-old Marilyn Bixler
  • An 81-year-old “Jane Doe”
  • 82-year-old Helen Lee

Soon after Chemirmir’s arrest in May 2019, Breitbart News exclusively reported that Chemirmir, born in Kenya, first arrived in the U.S. on a B-2 tourist visa in July 2003. Though Chemirmir was supposed to only temporarily be in the U.S., he overstayed his visa and became an illegal alien, eligible for deportation.

Chemirmir’s expired United States visa. (Photo via Dallas County District Court)

Chemirmir’s expired United States visa. (Photo via Dallas County District Court)

Chemirmir’s Kenyan passport documentation. (Photo via Dallas County District Court)

Chemirmir’s Kenyan passport documentation. (Photo via Dallas County District Court)

Rather than being deported — which would have made him ineligible to ever secure legal status in the U.S. — Chemirmir was able to use a loophole in the nation’s legal immigration system, allowing him to obtain a green card after marrying an American citizen. In November 2007, Chemirmir was approved for a green card.

Chemirmir had a criminal record, Breitbart News exclusively learned, including convictions for drunk driving, trespassing, assault, and obstructing a police officer.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here

Biden Announces Plans For ‘Permanent’ US Army Base in Poland

By Patrick Goodenough | June 30, 2022 | 4:34am EDT

  
President Biden at the NATO summit in Madrid on Wednesday. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / Pool / AFP via Getty Images)
President Biden at the NATO summit in Madrid on Wednesday. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / Pool / AFP via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – The United States will “establish a permanent headquarters for the U.S. Army Fifth Corps” in Poland, President Biden said on Wednesday, as he laid out plans to boost the U.S. military presence in Europe in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Biden’s announcement in Madrid was warmly welcomed by Poland, which has been calling for a permanent presence of NATO forces since 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and began supporting armed separatists in eastern Ukraine.

“Something that for many seemed impossible came true today – we now have a permanent U.S. military presence in Poland,” tweeted Polish deputy foreign minister Marcin Przydacz. “This sends a clear signal to Moscow. We are committed to our joint security and we will continue to push for the strengthening of Poland’s defenses.”

Speaking alongside NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg at the NATO summit, Biden said the U.S. “will enhance our force posture in Europe and respond to the changed security environment, as well as strengthening our collective security.”

In addition to the Poland plan, he said the U.S. would increase the number of U.S. Navy destroyers based at a NATO naval facility in Rota, Spain, from four to six.

The Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are equipped with the Aegis missile defense system, capable of detecting, tracking and destroying ballistic missiles.

The U.S. also plans to send two more F-35 squadrons to Britain, where the RAF Lakenheath air base northeast of London late last year became the first permanent foreign site in Europe for U.S. F-35s.

Further, Biden said the U.S. would have an additional rotational brigade stationed in Romania, enhance rotational troop deployments in the Baltic states, “and station additional air defense and other capabilities in Germany and in Italy.”

Biden said the U.S. had surged 20,000 forces to Europe earlier this year, taking the number of troops currently stationed in Europe to an estimated 100,000.

“We’re going to make sure that NATO is ready to meet threats from all directions, across every domain: land, air, and the sea,” he said.

“In a moment when Putin has shattered peace in Europe and attacked the very, very tenets of the rules-based order, the United States and our allies – we’re going to step up. We’re stepping up. We’re proving that NATO is more needed now than it ever has been and it’s as important as it has ever been.”

In response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine in 2014, NATO established four multinational “battlegroups” on NATO’s “eastern flank,” led by the U.S. in Poland, Britain in Estonia, Canada in Latvia, and Germany in Lithuania – on a rotational basis.

This year NATO agreed to double the number of battlegroups, and is setting up four more in Bulgaria (led by Bulgaria), Romania (led by France), Slovakia (led by Germany), and Hungary (led by Hungary).  The U.S. Army will also contribute one cavalry troop each to the new battlegroups in Hungary, Bulgaria, and Romania.

Poland and the Baltic states have been at the forefront of NATO’s response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and among Kyiv’s most ardent backers. Poland has also taken in a record number of Ukrainians displaced by the war, almost 1.2 million.

In the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, the alliance pledged that it would not pursue “additional permanent stationing of substantial combat forces” on the territory of countries that formerly fell within the Soviet sphere but were on track to join NATO (in 1999, 2004 and 2009).

However, that assurance was tied to “the current and foreseeable security environment,” and to a Russian undertaking to “exercise similar restraint in its conventional force deployments in Europe.”

NATO leaders have argued that the security environment has changed dramatically since 2014 – and especially, since last February.

Stoltenberg said earlier this year that as NATO looked to enhance its presence in along the eastern flank, “the NATO-Russia Founding Act is not something that will create problems or hindrance for NATO to make the necessary decisions.”

In a teleconference briefing on Wednesday, U.S. Assistant Secretary for Defense Celeste Wallander called the decision to permanently station the U.S. Army Fifth Corps headquarters in Poland “a significant decision precisely because of the changed security environment and the recognition that the United States needs to have a longer-term capability to sustain our presence, our training, our activities, and our support to the countries of the eastern flank, both bilaterally and through the NATO battlegroups.”

Asked about the question of “permanently” stationing the headquarters in Poland in the light of the NATO-Russia Founding Act, Wallander said it was her understanding that the move would comply with the 1997 document, which refers specifically to “substantial combat forces.”

The U.S. Army Fifth Corps’ history dates back to World War I. It took part in the D-Day landings and liberation of Europe in World War II, helped to defend Europe during the Cold War, and fought in the Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Corps’ headquarters in Ansbach, Germany was deactivated as a result of a Pentagon defense posture review in 2012 but it was reactivated in 2020, became fully operational late last year, and last spring moved from Fort Knox, Ky. back to Germany.

US announces plans to flood Europe with troops and weapons

In remarks at the NATO Summit in Madrid, Spain, US President Joe Biden announced a sweeping increase in US troop deployments to Europe as part of a plan by NATO to militarize the continent for its ongoing war with Russia and escalating conflict with China.

The NATO summit formally invited Sweden and Finland to join the alliance, effectively doubling NATO’s land border with Russia and consummating the military alliance’s decades-long eastward expansion.

Speaking Wednesday, Biden praised the decision of the governments of Sweden and Finland to “move away from neutrality and the tradition of neutrality.”

Biden announced that the US would send another 20,000 troops to Europe, bringing its total deployment there to 100,000.

He pledged to increase the number of US Navy destroyers stationed in Spain’s Naval Station Rota to six.

He also announced the formation of a permanent US military headquarters in Poland, marking an unprecedented US military inroad into a former Warsaw Pact country.

He also announced an additional “rotational brigade” of 5,000 personnel headquartered in Romania, as well as sending two additional F-35 fighter squadrons to the UK and the stationing of additional air defense systems in Germany and Italy.

Biden declared: “NATO is ready to meet threats from all directions, across every domain: land, air and the sea.”

The announcement is the largest military expansion in Europe in decades, the Wall Street Journal commented.

Critically, the summit announced the publication of a new NATO “strategic concept,” defining Russia as the “most significant and direct threat to the allies’ security.” Russia was previously classified as a “strategic partner” in NATO’s 2010 strategy document.

For the first time, the NATO strategic concept also targeted China, declaring that it posed a “challenge” to the alliance.

Individual NATO members pledged unlimited support to the war effort, with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz declaring that Germany would continue to arm Ukraine “intensively—for as long as it is necessary to enable Ukraine to defend itself.”

Significantly, the leaders of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand joined the summit, leading Foreign Affairs to comment that “battle lines are being drawn that could last for generations.”

The UK is expected to expand its troops stationed in Estonia from 1,000 to 1,700.

The Guardian noted, “In total, eight frontline Nato battlegroups stretching from Estonia to Bulgaria, once designed to act as small initial defence force, are expected to be increased in size to a brigade level of 3,000 to 5,000 troops.”

The overwhelming response in the US media and political establishment to Biden’s further commitment of blood and treasure to the war effort was enthusiastic support.

Hailing NATO’s plans to expand its fighting forces seven-fold, the Washington Post declared that if “Ukraine’s steadfast resistance and the West’s firm stance” continue, “success will follow.”

The New York Times, for its part, praised the would-be dictator Donald Trump’s calls for the expansion of US military spending, declaring in an editorial that Trump “wasn’t wrong” to call for Europe to spend more on its military. The Times concluded, “In this fateful moment, NATO must take a serious look not only at deterring Russia but also at itself, its purpose and its readiness to really share that burden.”

The NATO summit also marked a significant shift in the use of the war in Ukraine to more aggressively target China. On Wednesday, the White House added five Chinese companies to a blacklist for allegedly helping the Russian war effort.

The Commerce department claimed that the companies “continue to contract to supply Russian entity listed and sanctioned parties.”

Warning that this was only the beginning, Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security Alan Estevez said, “Today’s action sends a powerful message to entities and individuals across the globe that if they seek to support Russia, the United States will cut them off as well.”

In a critical admission, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg acknowledged that NATO had been expanding its forces in preparation for conflict with Russia for years, declaring, “The reality is also that we have been preparing for this since 2014. … That is the reason that we have increased our presence in the eastern part of the alliance, why NATO allies have started to invest more in defense, and why we have increased [our] readiness.”

Indeed, NATO’s European members along with Canada have increased military spending by between 1 percent and 6 percent every year since the 2014 US-backed coup in Kiev.

Five months after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the central war aims of the US and NATO are emerging clearly. In an interview with CNN over the weekend, moderator Jake Tapper asked Secretary of State Antony Blinken whether Russia was “taking over” significant sections of the country.

In response, Blinken downplayed the significance of Ukraine losing whole swaths of its territory, declaring, “let’s not confuse the tactical with strategic.”

He added, “[w]hat’s really important is the strategic proposition that Putin will not succeed in what he’s tried to achieve. … He’s also tried to divide NATO. We’re about to go to a NATO summit, where the alliance is going to show greater unity, greater strength than in my memory.”

In other words, the “strategic” goal of the United States in provoking Russia to invade Ukraine was to create the conditions for a massive rearmament of Europe, under American aegis.

The immediate targets of this rearmament will be Russia and China, but the massive land forces being mobilized will be used no less at home than abroad.


Mayorkas refuses to enforce the nation’s immigration laws — such as the detention and deportation of illegal migrants. So he sought to pin the blame on cartels that help smuggle migrants, including the 51 migrants who died in the sealed truck in San Antonio, Texas.


WHO WORKS HARDER FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS THAN JOE BIDEN??? “Joe Biden is great on immigration. I guess depends on your perspective. If you’re a human trafficker, or drug dealer, you’d give him an A-plus, but the American people would give him an F. The crisis at our border was not only entirely predictable, it was predicted. I predicted that if you campaign all year long on open borders, amnesty, and health care for illegals, you’re going to get more migrants at the border. That’s what’s happen SEN. TOM COTTON


Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted at least 40 million migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.


What's more, Mexico generally benefits from shipping its surplus uneducated population to the states to take the pressure valve off the potential for unrest. Corrupt Mexican officials often reap "fees" from letting illegal migrants from other countries as well as their own pass through their territory. MONICA SHOWALTER

“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United States. Mexican drug cartels are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in virtually  every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH

 


NAFTA JOE BIDEN PLEADS WITH MEXICO AND LA RAZA TO VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR MORE. AND VOTE OFTEN!!!

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/06/joe-biden-folks-im-not-worried-about.html

"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!

JAMES WALSH

THE OBAMA-BIDEN HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA… first ease millions of illegals over our borders and into our voting booths!

 How the Democrat party surrendered America to Mexico:

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2014/07/james-walsh-hispanicazation-of-america.html

 

“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.”  Washington Times

 

"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!

The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.

 The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”

 

Disclosures: Biden Has Released Nearly 1.05 million SW Border Migrants into the U.S.

More people than Delaware, and 2,115 per day — not counting “got-aways” and unaccompanied kids


JOE BIDEN GAMES THE COURTS AS HE DOES THE LAWS AND BORDERS FOR HIS INVADING ILLEGALS!

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2022/06/gamer-lawyer-joe-biden-games-laws.html

The immigration courts are supposed to give people who are seeking to remain in the United States or have violated the immigration law a fair review of any claims they have made. The Biden administration is trying to turn the immigration court into, essentially, a free candy store, so that anyone who appears in front of the immigration court winds up getting some kind of benefit or being allowed to stay in the United States. And that’s not what the courts were designed to do.


Tom Cotton: Democrats Try to Profit from Migrant Deaths

boston bomber check
Demetrius Freeman-Pool/Getty Images
8:42

Pro-migration liberals are using the truckful of dead migrants to push for even more migration, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) said Wednesday.

“Liberals are responding to this tragedy by calling for amnesty,” he tweeted on June 29. “But this would invite MORE illegal immigration, human trafficking, and suffering [and] The last thing we need is to make this border crisis worse–but amnesty would do just that,” he added.

The Democrats’ effort to shift the public focus towards amnesty for at least 11 million illegal migrants also helps them obscure the central role of their border-opening policies in the June 27 deaths of 51 migrants.

The dead migrants were found in a truck, abandoned roughly 150 miles north of the U.S.-Mexican border.

Those dead migrants are just a small share of the migrants who die at seaon highways, in desertsrivers, jungles, and snow as they try to slip through the growing number of loopholes carved in the border by President Joe Biden’s progressive deputies.

A June 25 poll shows that only 11 percent of 1,500 adult citizens strongly approve of Biden’s immigration policies. Forty-one percent strongly disapprove, said the YouGov poll for The Economist magazine.

The attempted shift of focus was reported on June 29:

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said he has restarted his immigration reform talks with Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) while the senators have been traveling together throughout Europe this week.

[…]

“We’ve been talking the last couple days about reviving that [immigration] effort,” Durbin said in an interview. “And I think what happened at the border with finding 51 dead migrants in that tractor trailer is what I would call a ‘Uvalde moment.’ I hope it sparks an interest in finding a bipartisan approach to dealing with immigration.”

Durbin’s comment about a “Uvalde moment” is a reference to the massacre at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, which sparked Senate action on gun reforms and produced the first successful piece of legislation on the issue in decades.

“They’re just trying to use tragic deaths to their [political] advantage,” a Hill source told Breitbart News, adding: 

Those deaths would not have happened but for the Democratic [border welcome] policy that Joe Biden has put in place.

For Democrats, nothing short of totally open borders is a just alternative. In their eyes, anything short of unlimited, unchecked migration [of future Democratic voters] is always going to be to blamed for anything bad that happens … They have zero concern for the deaths of the 50 people in a box truck. They don’t have a preference on whether they die or not. If they did, Remain in Mexico would be in place right now, because that’s when we didn’t have box trucks full of people dying in the sun. 

“They’re happy to break as many eggs as they need to get what they want,” he said, adding:

They don’t mind if they screw over American citizens, they don’t mind if they screw up some of their election chances — [as long as] they can create a [migration] system in which immigration controls don’t have any effective meaning. Then it’s worth whatever price it took to get there. That’s why you can never shame them out of this [political] policy.

The mass inflow of migrants forces down wages for white-collar and blue-collar Americans, and raises families’ housing costs.

The mass inflow also aids drug smugglers, scrambles kids’ K-12 education, and minimizes the high-tech, labor-saving investment that is needed to help American employees stay ahead of their Chinese and European rivals. 

Police found 42 migrants dead in a tractor-trailer near San Antonio. (KSAT Video Screenshot)

Police found 42 migrants dead in a tractor-trailer near San Antonio. (KSAT Video Screenshot)

Yet Democrats also mask their policy of extracting young people from poor countries as noble support from Democrats for the helpless victims of oppression.

“This is horrific,” tweeted Mexico-born Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-IL) shortly after the bodies were found in the overheated trailer truck. “We need to end Title 42 and fix our broken immigration system so these unimaginable tragedies stop … People fleeing violence and poverty deserve a chance at a better life.”

Multiple media reports show the dead migrants were not refugees fleeing oppression, persecution, or war. Instead, they were ordinary economic migrants who were rationally using Biden’s’ loose-border policies to get themselves and their children into low-wage jobs in Americans’ workplaces. 

USA Today reported:

Authorities confirmed that one of the surviving Mexicans from the trailer was José Luis Guzmán Vásquez, 32, from San Miguel Huautla in the southern state of Oaxaca, according to Aida Ruiz García, director of the Oaxacan Institute for Migrant Attention.

A cousin, Alejandro López, told Milenio television that the family worked in farming and construction and migrated because “we don’t have anything but weaving hats, palms and handicrafts.”

Reuters also described the same motivations in a June 29 report from Oaxaca City, which is “a remote mountainous community in southern Mexico, where a single telephone connects a few indigenous families to the outside world”:

The last time [Javier] Flores called his family was June 19, when he told them he had already crossed the border and was hiding in a house in Texas, according to Velasco. Flores’ family is now anxiously hoping for news that he is alive.

“He told me he was going to look for a better life,” Flores’ mother, Virgilia Lopez, told Reuters. “To send his kids to school, help them get ahead and have a better future.”

Metro.co.UK reported on June 29:

Carla and Griselda Carac Tambriz – originally from the Colcajá canton, Nahualá, Sololá – died in the truck which may have been carrying as many as 100 people across the Mexican border into the US.

One of the youngsters reportedly said before embarking on their journey: ‘Let’s achieve our dreams and also help our family.’

The girls’ identities were confirmed to Guatemalan-based newspaper El Metropolitano by immigration consultant Fernando Castro Molina on Tuesday afternoon.

Extraction Migration

Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted at least 40 million migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.

This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wagesraises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.

Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states.

An economy built on extraction migration encourages wealthy elites to shift their sympathy to grateful migrants, and away from the despairing Americans at the bottom of society who sometimes vote against the elites’ political interests. That migration-enabled betrayal of fellow citizens then alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic civic culture.

The extraction migration economic policy is hidden behind a wide variety of noble-sounding excuses and explanations. For example, progressives claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants” that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees, and that the state must renew itself by replacing populations.

But the colonialism-like economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, and splits foreign families as it extracts human-resource wealth from the poor home countries. The migration policy also minimizes shareholder pressure on companies to build up beneficial trade with poor countries.

The polls show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

The opposition is growinganti-establishmentmultiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-basedbipartisanrationalpersistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to one another.

YOU WONDERED WHY YOU COULDN'T PAY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE? YOU'RE PAYING FOR MEXICO'S!

No comments: