VIDEO ON THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA
Miller on GOP candidates avoiding immigration, crime: Push messages where there is 'nowhere to hide'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S70-QBV6FoE
JOE BIDEN GETS MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS OVER THE BORDERS AND SCATTERED ALL OVER AMERICA. THE NEXT TIME YOU SEEM THEM THEY WILL BE IN YOUR JOB.
Unbelievable' video shows border agents opening gate to migrants
“Joe Biden is great on immigration. I guess depends on your perspective. If you’re a human trafficker, or drug dealer, you’d give him an A-plus, but theAmerican people would give him an F. The crisis at our border was not only entirely predictable, it was predicted. I predicted that if you campaign all year long on open borders, amnesty, and health care for illegals, you’re going to get more migrants at the border. That’s what’s happened since the election.” SEN. TOM COTTON
“Mexican authorities have arrested the former mayor of a rural community in the border state of Coahuila in connection with the kidnapping, murder and incineration of hundreds of victims through a network of ovens at the hands of the Los Zetas cartel. The arrest comes after Breitbart Texas exposed not only the horrors of the mass extermination, but also the cover-up and complicity of the Mexican government.”
Poll: Joe Biden’s Migration Is an ‘Invasion’ Says 54 Percent Majority
A majority of Americans say President Joe Biden is allowing a southern border invasion, according to a poll commissioned by the left-of-center, taxpayer-supported National Public Radio (NPR)
The 54 percent “Invasion” majority includes 76 percent of Republicans, 46 percent of independents, and even 40 percent of Democrats.
Just 19 percent of all respondents — or one in five — said the term is false.
Joel Rose, a pro-migration NPR journalist, lamented the mainstream 3:1 public judgment revealed by the July 28-29 survey of 1,116 adults, saying:
Republican leaders are increasingly framing the situation as an “invasion.” Immigrant advocates say the word has a long history in white nationalist circles, and warn that such extreme rhetoric could provoke more violence against immigrants.
Still, the polling shows that the word “invasion” has been embraced by a wide range of Americans to describe what’s happening at the border
“We are not actually screening enough people to make it safe for the rest of the country,” said poll respondent Michael Cisternino, a Republican from Nevada, in a follow-up interview. “We, the people of the United States, really don’t have control over who’s coming in, and where they’re going or what they’re going to do when they get there — if they’re criminals, if they’re not criminals,” Cisternino said.
Many migrants also credit Biden for the inflow. “He promised the Haitian community he will help them,” one migrant told Fox News in June 2022., adding: “He will recall Title 42. He will help us have real asylum.”
The Ipsos poll may understate the public’s view of Biden’s migration as an “invasion” because many respondents claimed ignorance or hid their views. For example, 36 percent of independents and 25 percent of Democrats said they “Don’t know” when asked about the invasion term.
The polling firm, Ipsos, claimed the data shows how “misleading information or politically charged rhetoric about immigration has taken root among a significant portion of the American public.”
The poll was taken as Biden’s inflow approaches three million economic migrants.
That tide of workers, consumers, and renters includes 2 million who were admitted under a variety of legal pretexts, plus roughly one million who sneaked past the distracted border guards. The flood is likely to help suppress wages for ordinary Americans, and also drive up rents and inflation.
In December, the Supreme Court will hear arguments that Biden and his deputies are willfully ignoring their obligation to detain job-seeking border crossers. The laws include 8 U.S.C. §§ 1226(c)(1), 1231(a)(2), and 1231(a)(1)(A), which say the attorney general “shall take into custody,” “shall detain,” and “shall remove” migrants.
However, the establishment media has tried to minimize coverage of the migration, For example, the Ipsos poll showed that only 48 percent of all respondents — and 38 percent of Democrats — understood that “The number of migrant apprehensions at the southern border was higher in 2021 than ever before.”
The data breakout in the Ipsos poll showed that 28 percent of all respondents said the invasion term is “Completely true.” That group includes 12 percent of Democrats, 51 percent of Republicans, and 24 percent of independents.
Another 25 percent said the term is “Somewhat true.” That group includes 29 percent of Democrats, 26 percent of Republicans, and 18 percent of independents.
The GOP majority which endorses the “invasion” term includes some who know that former President Donald Trump has been using the term. “We must stop the invasion at our southern border,” Trump said in August to loud applause at a CPAC event in Texas. The fix, he added, is for a GOP majority to cut off funding:
Republicans in Congress must make clear that on their watch not a single penny of taxpayer money will go to funding Joe Biden’s open border agenda. It’s a sick agenda. It’s a sick agenda. Makes no sense … Next year we have to use the purse strings to send a message to every would-be illegal alien all over the world. If you break into our country illegally you will be caught, we will detain you and we will quickly send you back to the place from which you came or put you in prison
But Trump’s opinion cannot be used to explain why 40 percent of Democrats favor the invasion term, according to the poll results.
Strangely, the poll asked respondents just one question about the pocketbook impact of Biden’s mass migration: “When jobs are scarce, employers should prioritize hiring people of this country over immigrants[?]” Forty-eight percent agreed, and 15 percent disagreed, including 23 percent of Democrats.
Biden’s two-year inflow is an economic shock equal to the number of Americans who entered the workforce during the first nine months of 2022.
The poll also showed that 71 percent of Republicans and 44 percent of independents believe the migration is a “major problem. Just 31 percent of Democrats described it as a major problem.
The Trump-created, Biden-canceled “Remain in Mexico” program is very popular. Fifty-seven percent of all respondents favoring a policy that “Requiring asylum seekers at the southern U.S. border to remain in Mexico until an immigration court can hear their case.” Just 25 percent opposed the plan.
Extraction Migration
Wall Street is built on Extraction Migration. The policy extracts human material — migrants — from poor countries and uses them as workers, renters, and consumers to shift vast wealth from ordinary people to billionaires and Wall St.
Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of legal and illegal migrants — plus temporary visa workers — from poor countries to serve as workers, managers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.
This policy of labor inflation makes it difficult for ordinary Americans to advance in their careers, get married, raise families, or buy homes.
Extraction migration slows innovation and shrinks Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to boost stock prices by using cheap stoop labor instead of productivity-boosting technology. The flood of cheap labor tilts the economy towards low-productivity jobs and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.
Migration undermines employees’ workplace rights, and it widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states.
An economy built on extraction migration also drains Americans’ political clout over elites, alienates young people, and radicalizes Americans’ democratic civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
The economic policy is backed by progressives who wish to transform the U.S. from a society governed by European-origin civic culture into a progressive-directed empire of competitive, resentful identity groups. “We’re trying to become the first multiracial, multi-ethnic superpower in the world,” Rep. Rohit Khanna (D-CA) told the New York Times in March 2022. “It will be an extraordinary achievement … we will ultimately triumph,” he boasted.
Business-backed progressive advocates hide this Extraction Migration economic policy behind a wide variety of noble-sounding explanations and theatrical border security programs. Progressives claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants,” that migration is good for migrants, and that the state must renew itself by replacing populations.
Establishment Republicans and major GOP donors hide the wealth shift towards investors by amplifying the conservative media coverage of border chaos, welfare spending, migrant crime, and drugs.
Many polls show the public wants to welcome some immigration — but they also show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.
This “Third Rail” opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity that American citizens owe to one another.
CBP Encounters with Russians at Mexican Border Rose from 1 in July 2020 to 1,965 This July
(CNSNews.com) - The number of times that U.S. Customs and Border Patrol agents encountered Russian nationals at the U.S.-Mexico border climbed from just 1 in July 2020 to 1,965 in July 2022, according to data published by U.S. Custom and Border Protection.
Border Patrol encounters with Russians at the Mexican border began climbing in early 2021—a year before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which began on Feb. 24, 2022.
By contrast, CBP encounters with Ukrainians at the Mexican border remained comparatively low until March of this year—the first month after Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion.
In February, CBP encountered 272 Ukrainians at the Mexican border. In March, that climbed to 3,274. Then, in April, it jumped to 20,118.
In May, however, CBP encountered only 375 Ukrainians at the Mexican border.
February 2022, when Russia invaded Ukraine, is the only month since August 2021, when CBP has not encountered at least a thousand Russians at the Mexican border. That month, it encountered 769.
But in March, the number of Russians that CBP encountered at the Mexican border climbed back up to 1,217. In April it was 1,682; and, in May, it hit a peak of 3,394.
In June, the number of Russians encountered by the Border Patrol at the Mexican border dropped to 2,075; and, in July, it dropped to 1,965.
So far in fiscal 2022 (October 2021 through July 2022), CBP has encountered 17,524 Russians at the Mexican border. During that same period, it has encountered 25,278 Ukrainians.
“Encounters,” according to the Department of Homeland Security, is the “sum of USBP [U.S. Border Patrol] Title 8 apprehensions, OFO [Office of Field Operations] Title 8 inadmissibles, and noncitizens processed for expulsions under Title 42 authority by USBP or OFO.”
The Congressional Research Service said in a report published in July that some Ukrainian and Russian migrants have adopted a technique that has been used by Cuban migrants to reach the United States.
“Tens of thousands of Cubans have traveled via airplane to Nicaragua to migrate northward, as Nicaragua lifted visa requirements for Cubans in November 2021,” said the Congressional Research Service. “Others from outside the Western Hemisphere also appear to have used this tactic; since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, thousands of Russians and Ukrainians have traveled to Mexico as tourists to apply for asylum in the United States at the Southwest border.
Report: U.S. Marshals Service Drafts Federal Sanctuary Policy to Release Criminal Illegal Aliens
The United States Marshals Service is reportedly drafting a federal sanctuary policy to release criminal illegal aliens into American communities rather than turning them over to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.
An exclusive report from the Washington Times‘s Stephen Dinan reveals that the U.S. Marshals Service is looking at creating a federal sanctuary policy to help criminal illegal aliens evade arrest by ICE and has already started enforcing such a policy in some states.
Dinan reports for the Times:
The U.S. Marshals Service is drafting a sanctuary policy that would limit the agency’s ability to hold illegal immigrants for pickup by ICE, The Washington Times has learned. [Emphasis added]
Under the policy, marshals would not be able to hold illegal immigrants for pickup by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on the say-so of an immigration warrant, or “detainer” request. Once the Marshals Service is finished processing an immigrant for its custody purposes, the person is to be released even if ICE has asked for a hold. [Emphasis added]
Officials said the policy is still in draft form, though The Times knows of one jurisdiction in Florida where it has already been implemented, according to a memo sent to employees this summer. [Emphasis added]
The federal sanctuary policy would come as President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has successfully slashed the number of arrests and deportations of illegal aliens via so-called “sanctuary country” policies that prevent ICE agents from arresting most illegal aliens — even those with extensive criminal histories.
ICE data, reported by Breitbart News, shows that before Biden’s sanctuary country policies, the agency was deporting more than 120 illegal aliens every day on average. After the policies went into effect last year, daily deportations dropped to just 65 a day on average.
A federal sanctuary policy for the U.S. Marshals Service would be significant because nearly all foreign nationals in the agency’s custody are illegal aliens. A Department of Justice (DOJ) report from 2020 revealed that 94 percent of foreign nationals in Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Marshals Service custody are illegal aliens.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
JUDICIAL WATCH:
“The greatest criminal threat to the daily lives of American citizens are the Mexican drug cartels.”
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-american-border-with-narcomex.html
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United States. Mexican drug cartels are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
“Mexican authorities have arrested the former mayor of a rural community in the border state of Coahuila in connection with the kidnapping, murder and incineration of hundreds of victims through a network of ovens at the hands of the Los Zetas cartel. The arrest comes after Breitbart Texas exposed not only the horrors of the mass extermination, but also the cover-up and complicity of the Mexican government.”
“Heroin is not produced in the United States. Every gram of heroin present in the United States provides unequivocal evidence of a failure of border security because every gram of heroin was smuggled into the United States. Indeed, this is precisely a point that Attorney General Jeff Sessions made during his appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on October 18, 2017 when he again raised the need to secure the U.S./Mexican border to protect American lives.” Michael Cutler …..FrontPageMag.com
Fentanyl Seizures Tripled Nationwide in July, Enough to Kill 469 Million People
The amount of fentanyl seized nationwide tripled in July to 203 percent compared to the month of June, according U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data.
More tangibly, law enforcement seized 2,071 pounds of fentanyl last month compared to 680 pounds in June. July’s amount is “equivalent to 469 million lethal doses,” reported FAIR, which is based on government data.
“This is only the fentanyl that is being seized as the vast majority is getting through undetected according to the DEA,” said Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), a ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
Additionally, CBP reported that ten individuals on the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s terror watchlist were apprehended in July near the Southwest border, bringing the total for the fiscal year to 66. Overall, CBP saw a 7 percent decrease in illegal aliens expelled using Title 42, down to 37 percent, according to the report.
“The Biden administration — they are breaking the wrong kind of record. When you look at a 203 percent increase in these fentanyl seizures, when you look at the number of illegal immigrants coming across the border, the apprehensions that got away, and ten from the known terrorist list — this is something that should cause every single American a lot of concern,” Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) said on Tuesday in response to the new CBP data.
Drug seizures overall were down one percent in July compared to June, with a 56 percent drop in cocaine seizures likely driving the decrease. However, in addition to the 203 percent fentanyl seizure increase, methamphetamine seizures increased 15 percent, and heroin seizures increased 8 percent.
Portman noted that with two months left in the fiscal year, 2022 has already seen more border encounters than last year and any year on record, citing CBP data.
“The July CBP numbers show more than 199,900 total encounters at the border. The first two years of the Biden administration have been the highest two years of unlawful migration in our nation’s history,” Portman said. “It’s clear that this administration’s failed policies are encouraging unlawful migration. The July CBP numbers also included more than 52,000 migrant family members; more than 134,000 single adult migrants; and more than 13,200 unaccompanied children.”
FAIR reported that July’s apprehensions represent a 325 percent increase “from the average number of July apprehensions under President Trump.” July was also the 17th straight month of more than 150,000 encounters.
“As I have told the administration countless times, this is no time to end policies like Remain in Mexico or Title 42 that deter smugglers and migrants,” Portman concluded. “The lack of responsible border policies by this administration is allowing Mexican transnational criminal organizations to push deadly substances into communities in Ohio and traffic unlawful migrants into the country. This administration must take action to end their border crisis to ensure the safety and security of all Americans.”
No comments:
Post a Comment