Tuesday, September 20, 2011

ALIPAC - DEMS IN NEW MEXICO PUSHING FOR DRIVERS LICENSE (de facto citizenship) FOR LA RAZA

ARE DEMS ALWAYS THE PARTY FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND THE EVER EXPANDING MEX WELFARE STATE?




Friends of ALIPAC,

We have fought many state legislative battles over the years and have played a key role in stopping illegal aliens from getting driver licenses in many states!

It has been a long hard road, but we are now down to only three states that still give licenses to illegal aliens thanks to your donations of time and funds.

Today, there is a fierce political battle raging between true Americans and the illegal alien supporters over licenses for illegal aliens.

The new governor of New Mexico campaigned on a promise to stop the state from giving licenses to illegal aliens.

Now, her efforts to honor her promise to American voters are being blocked by Democrats in the New Mexico state legislature.

It is time for our legendary ALIPAC Activists from across America to swing into action in New Mexico!

Step 1: CONTACT AND SUPPORT NEW MEXICO GOVERNOR MARTINEZ

Call and write New Mexico Governor Susana Martinez to thank and encourage her for standing up against licenses for illegal aliens.

CONTACT INFO
Gov. Martinez's office
Phone: (505)476-2200
Fax: (505) 476-2226

Online Contact
http://www.governor.state.nm.us/Contact_the_Governor.aspx

The mailing address is:
Office of the Governor
490 Old Santa Fe Trail
Room 400
Santa Fe, NM 87501

Sample Message "I'm calling/writing to thank Governor Susana Martinez for standing up for Americans by opposing licenses for illegal aliens. New Mexico is one of the last states offering licenses to illegal aliens and 77% of Americans oppose licenses for illegals. It is good to see an elected official standing up for Americans of every race instead of for illegal immigrants. I plan to contact members of the New Mexico legislature to demand that they support Governor Martinez's efforts to stop illegal aliens from receiving New Mexico licenses. Please keep up the good work."



Step 2: Lobby New Mexico Legislature to Stop Licenses for Illegals

We need thousands of calls (the most effective lobbying action) with follow-ups in writing flooding into the New Mexico legislature this week. Please make an effort to call and write some each day as much as you can!

Remember to craft your own distinct message, and to personalize each call and e-mail to the legislator you are contacting by name for MAXIMUM impact.

CONTACT INFO FOR NEW MEXICO LEGISLATORS AT...
http://www.nmlegis.gov/lcs/leg.aspx?T=R

Sample Message: "I am calling/writing to ask the New Mexico Democrats to stand with Governor Martinez and her efforts to end New Mexico's deplorable policy of giving driver licenses to illegal aliens. As fallen New York Governor Elliot Spitzer learned the hard way, over 77% of Americans oppose licenses for illegal aliens. That is why 47 other states have taken steps to assure illegal immigrants cannot receive licenses. New Mexico should join the 47 other states and 77% of Americans who also oppose licenses for illegal immigrants."

Step 3: If you receive feedback or pushback from any New Mexico lawmakers, or if you have questions, concerns, suggestions, etc... Please post your progress or questions at our online tracking link. If you do not have a posting account yet, you may apply by contacting Accounts@alipac.us

Tracking link
http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1267750.html#1267750


Illegal aliens are traveling from all across America to get licenses in New Mexico. Stopping these licenses and displaying another big win for immigration enforcement over Amnesty would increase pressures for illegal aliens to leave America as they are already doing.

Please help us by taking a few minutes a day each week to get these calls, emails, faxes, and letters raining down on New Mexico law makers!

Speak out America!


The ALIPAC Team
www.alipac.us
AMERICANS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION PAC
Post Office Box 30966, Raleigh, NC 27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 703-0864
FEC ID: C00405878


PS: Please watch our homepage at www.ALIPAC.us closely for updates about efforts to stop licenses for illegals in New Mexico.

OBAMAnomics: Cut Medicare to Pay For His Banksters' Looting

http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

Obama’s budget plan: Cut social spending, lower tax rates for the rich
By Joseph Kishore
20 September 2011
The Obama administration released its plan Monday for reducing the federal budget deficit by $4 trillion over 10 years. The measures, presented as a proposal to the bipartisan deficit committee established by the debt-ceiling bill passed in August, would slash hundreds of billions of dollars from social programs.
Among the services and programs targeted are the primary government health care programs Medicare and Medicaid, federal workers’ retirement benefits, veterans’ benefits, unemployment insurance and the US Postal Service.
Obama’s cynicism and dishonesty are perhaps most clearly revealed by his tax proposals, which are being presented by the media as an effort to increase taxes on the wealthy and corporations. In fact, the administration is strongly backing comprehensive “pro-growth” tax reform, which would significantly reduce the top income tax rate and the corporate tax rate in exchange for the elimination of certain loopholes in the tax code.
The administration’s plan, “Living Within Our Means and Investing in Our Future,” was presented to the “super committee” of six Republican and six Democratic congressmen that is tasked with submitting a proposal by December for at least $1.5 trillion in deficit reduction. Any agreement reached in the coming weeks will inevitably be even more directly tailored to the interests of the corporate elite than Obama’s plan.
If an agreement is not reached, mandatory cuts are to be implemented in Medicare and military spending, with a large portion of the latter coming from veterans’ health benefits.
Obama’s proposal follows calls from a group of corporate executives and politicians of both political parties for the congressional committee to “go big” and enact cuts far in excess of what is required by the debt ceiling legislation. Thirty-six Democratic and Republican senators issued a statement last Thursday calling for a debt reduction package of about $4 trillion.
“Congress should seize the opportunity that this new committee presents to do much more so that we can put the country on a sustainable fiscal path, which is critical for our long-term growth and competitiveness,” the president wrote in the introduction to his proposal.
The plan includes a debt cap that will trigger across-the-board spending cuts if debt-to-GDP targets are not reached by 2014.
In his remarks introducing the proposal, Obama presented the deficit-cutting measures as part of his “jobs” campaign. His American Jobs Act—a package dominated by corporate tax cuts and pro-business infrastructure proposals—is included in the plan for the committee. This is intended to make clear that his paltry jobs initiatives are entirely subordinated to the overall goal of slashing government spending.
The budget plan includes “structural reforms to reduce the cost of health care in programs like Medicare and Medicaid,” Obama said. He added that these “reforms” would build upon his administration’s health care overhaul passed in 2010. That was an initial step in cutting corporate and government spending on health care to the detriment of working people’s access to drugs, procedures and tests.
Cost reductions would come from “changing some incentives,” making health care “more efficient and more accountable,” and ensuring that “instead of just paying for procedures, providers will be paid more when they improve results.”
Such verbal bromides, including the standard Orwellian line that the cuts are aimed at “strengthening Medicare and Medicaid over time,” are intended to cloak the actual consequences of the measures—the reduction or elimination of care for millions of people.
Medicare spending would be cut by $248 billion over 10 years, and Medicaid and other health care programs would be slashed by $73 billion. The administration is anticipating more than a trillion dollars in reduced spending the following decade. The administration’s proposal would strengthen the Independent Payment Advisory Board, tasked with finding ways to reduce Medicare costs.
The cuts in Medicaid are significantly underestimated, as the program is jointly funded by the states, which will implement a large portion of the cuts.
An additional $257 billion would be cut from non-health government spending. This is on top of the $1 trillion in cuts already passed after the debt ceiling debate in the summer. These earlier cuts are included in $4 trillion figure.
Among Obama’s new proposals are:
• Cuts of $21 billion by “better aligning” the retirement program for government workers “with the private sector.” That is, the cuts in pensions being implemented by corporations throughout the country will serve as a model for the federal government.
• At least $27.3 billion in cuts in military retirement and health benefits, including increasing co-pays and introducing a $200 annual fee for TRICARE-For-Life, a supplemental health insurance program for veterans over 65.
• $25 billion in revenue by increasing the “Aviation Passenger Security Fee,” a tax applied to every airline fare to reimburse the government for the police-state security measures implemented at airports throughout the country.
• $19 billion in federal deficit reduction through cuts in the US Postal Service. These include cuts in health care contributions, authority for the Postal Service to shift to a five-day delivery schedule (which will be accompanied by thousands of job cuts), and increases in postal rates.
• $33 billion to be saved through changes in unemployment insurance payments
• $4.2 billion in cuts to the National Flood Insurance Program
• $22 billion in deficit reduction through the sale of government assets, including radio spectra and property.
The administration did not include proposals for cuts in Social Security, but Obama insisted in his remarks that “both parties are going to need to work together on a separate track to strengthen Social Security.” During the summer, Obama called for changes to the cost of living formula in the retirement program aimed at reducing benefits.
The plan also factors in $1 trillion in cuts from reduced spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Such cuts have been included in all the various budget proposals, including those drawn up by the Republicans. In the likely event that these reductions don’t materialize, the difference will have to be made up through additional cuts in social programs.
Obama called for “tax reform” that would: lower individual and corporate tax rates; cut tax breaks that are “inefficient, unfair or both;” increase “job creation and growth” by “increasing the incentive to work and invest in the United States;” and satisfy the “Buffet rule” that no household making over $1 million should pay a lower effective income tax rate than a middle-class family.
These changes would supposedly reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion over ten years.
The “Buffet rule” has been cited as a call for a significant increase in taxes on the wealthy. In fact, it is compatible with a substantial reduction in tax rates for corporations and the rich, as called for by previous deficit reduction committees. The co-chairmen of the panel set up by Obama last year, Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, proposed reducing the top income tax rate from 35 percent to 23 percent.
In his remarks, Obama repeated a dozen times his insistence that everyone should pay his “fair share.” Responding to Republican charges that his tax proposals constituted “class warfare,” Obama said, “I reject the idea that asking a hedge fund manager to pay the same tax rate as a plumber or teacher is class warfare. I think it is just the right thing to do.”
Not once in his remarks did Obama defend the principle of the progressive income tax—that the wealthy should pay significantly more as a percentage of their income than the poor. There is no contradiction between the “Buffet rule” and a flat income tax, and Obama’s denunciations of an overly complex tax system mirrored similar rhetoric used by right-wing advocates of a regressive income tax overhaul.
“Nobody wants to punish success [i.e., wealth] in America,” Obama declared. However, he added, “those who have done well, including me, should pay our fair share in taxes.”
The elimination of loopholes was presented by Obama as if it would target only deductions exploited by corporations and the wealthy. In fact, many of the proposals that have been presented by previous bipartisan committees, such as the elimination of the mortgage tax deduction, would hit broad sections of the population.
“We have one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world,” Obama declared. He said he wanted to “work with Democrats and Republicans to reform our entire tax code.”
Arguing that his proposals were corporate-friendly, he said, “Some companies get out of paying a lot of taxes, while the rest of the end up having to foot the bill. And this makes our entire economy less competitive and our country a less desirable place to do business.”
In the event that a comprehensive tax overhaul is not carried out, the administration is proposing other specific measures to increase revenues, including an end to the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, the elimination of certain subsides for oil companies, and the like. The White House is well aware that any such measures will be rejected by the Republicans and therefore will not be proposed by the committee. The committee was deliberately structured so that the Republicans could block any significant tax increase on the wealthy.
The remarks by Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner in a press conference following Obama’s speech underscored the cynical and demagogic character of the White House’s talk of cutting tax loopholes for big business and ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. “The president did lay out very detailed changes for individuals and corporations if we are trying to get more out of the current tax system,” Geithner said. He stressed, however, that “the best strategy for the country is to try to reform the overall system, so that we are bringing down rates where we can, we are eliminating all the wasteful subsidies and preferences in the tax code… That is the best way to go.”
*
WALL STREET’S RAPE AND LOOTING OF AMERICA… OBAMA’S ASSURES THEM THEY WILL CONTINUE TO WIN!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/notes-on-social-crisis-in-america.html

*
UNEMPLOYMENT IN MEXICO UNDER 5%. UNEMPLOYMENT IN PARTS MEXICAN-OCCUPIED CALIFORNIA IS NEARLY 30%!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/07/unemployment-in-mexico-under-6-in.html


*
Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses

BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY


Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.
Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
*

Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.
Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:
* The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control
* The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
* Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics
If you’ve wondered what’s happening to our country, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages” that create make-work government jobs, this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
*
“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”
*
An initial term sheet outlining a possible settlement emerged in March, with institutions including Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo being asked to pay about $20 billion that would go toward loan modifications and possibly counseling for homeowners.
In exchange, the attorneys general participating in the deal would have agreed to sign broad releases preventing them from bringing further litigation on matters relating to the improper bank practices.

Obama’s budget plan: Cut social spending, lower tax rates for the rich

Obama’s budget plan: Cut social spending, lower tax rates for the rich