Friday, June 11, 2021

NANCY PELOSI AND HER MUSLIM RACIST IN CONGRESS

DO YOU EVER WONDER IF THERE IS A SINGLE DEMOCRAT POL WHO IS NOT ANTI-AMERICA???

WE MAY NEVER RECOVER FROM WHAT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS DONE TO THIS NATION.

Jews may be realizing that the Democrat party is not their friend

I have access to a Facebook group composed of strongly Democrat-voting Jewish Zionists.  It has been fascinating over the past six months watching them coming to come to terms with the fact that, no matter how much Democrats talk about "white supremacists," the only hatred for Jews and Israel is coming from people affiliated with the Democrat party. 

Nancy Pelosi: ‘No’ Further Action Needs to Be Taken Against Ilhan Omar Equating U.S., Israel to Terrorists

Korean President Moon Jae-in (L) and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) deliver brief remarks during a press availability in her offices at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2021 in Washington, DC. Moon will also travel to the White House to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden to …
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
2:04

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during an event, Friday, to discuss the American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan said that no further action needs to be taken on far-left radical Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) remarks comparing the United States and Israel to terrorists.

A reporter asked the speaker, during the event, if “any further action should be taken against Rep. Omar for her comments.”

“No,” Pelosi said, cutting the reporter off.

Pelosi continued to say, “I think that she, clarified her remarks, and that was, uh, uh, we accept that and, uh, she, she, she has a point that she wanted to make, and she has a right to make that point,” adding that she Omar already tried to clarify her remarks:

Breitbart News previously reported Omar made remarks during a hearing she attended virtually to question Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The tweet in which Omar attached a video of her remarks said, “We must have the same level of accountability and justice for all victims of crimes against humanity.”

The tweet continued, “We have seen unthinkable atrocities committed by the U.S., Hamas, Israel, Afghanistan, and the Taliban.”

Watch:

Eventually, Omar scrambled as she tried to clean up her mess by attempting to clarify the initial comment made.

In a statement, she said, “On Monday, I asked Secretary of State Antony Blinken about an ongoing International Criminal Court Investigation.”

“The conversation was about accountability for specific incidents regarding those ICC cases, not a moral comparison between Hamas and the Taliban and the U.S. and Israel,” she noted, “I was in no way equating terrorist organizations with democratic countries with well-established judicial systems.”

Timely: Orlando Terror Turns Five

Islamic State supporter Omar Mateen killed 49 innocents.

  6 comments

“An American-born man who’d pledged allegiance to ISIS gunned down 49 people early Sunday at a gay nightclub in Orlando, the deadliest mass shooting in the United States and the nation’s worst terror attack since 9/11, authorities said,” read the CNN report on the June 12, 2016 terrorist attack at the Pulse club.

Shooter Omar Mateen, 29, called 911 during the attack to pledge allegiance to the Islamic State and also mentioned the Boston Marathon bombers. The FBI had interviewed Mateen in 2013 and 2014 but he “was not found to be a threat” and at the time of the attack he was not under investigation.

Mateen’s parents, who hailed from Afghanistan, “didn’t consider him particularly religious and didn’t know of any connection he had to ISIS.” Mateen’s ex-wife Sitora Yusufiy, “originally from Uzbekistan,” told CNN Mateen “was bipolar, although he was not formally diagnosed.” 

A website associated with the ISIS news agency Amaq said the attack was “carried out by an Islamic State fighter.” CNN’s Salma Abdelaziz, “cautioned about taking the message at face value.”

“This community was shaken by an evil and hateful act,” said the composite character president David Garrow described in Rising Star: The Making of Barack Obama. The president’s 1855-word statement did not identify the shooter and named not a single one of Mateen’s victims.

“We will continue to be relentless against terrorist groups like ISIL and al Qaeda,” the president said but, the Orlando and San Bernardino “terrorist attacks” were carried out “not by external plotters, not by vast networks or sophisticated cells, but by deranged individuals warped by the hateful propaganda that they had seen over the Internet.” The president’s statement included no mention of “Islamic,” “Muslim,” or “jihadist.”

Omar Mateen’s victims included African Americans Antonio Davon Brown, 29; Tevin Eugene Crosby, 25; and Jason Benjamin Josaphat, only 19. The president’s statement contained no reference to racism on the part of Omar Mateen. The victims included many homosexuals, but the president did not charge Mateen with homophobia. The president did decry “the plague of violence that these weapons of war inflict on so many young lives.”

In a 337-word statement, vice president Joe Biden denounced “an act of pure hate and unspeakable terror,” but did not name the shooter or any of his victims. Biden was uncertain of “any connection or inspiration there may be with terrorist organizations,” and did not mention the Islamic State. The violence was “not normal” and “the targeting of our lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans is evil and abhorrent.”  Vice president Biden failed to note that victims included African Americans and Puerto Ricans of African ancestry.

“The Orlando terrorist may be dead, but the virus that poisoned his mind remains very much alive,” said presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Like Obama and Biden, Clinton denounced “assault weapons” and “weapons of war,” which apparently act independently. None of the three linked the attack to radical Islamic terrorism, an evasion also on display in the response to Hidal Hasan’s mass murder of American soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas, on November 5, 2009.

The self-described “Soldier of Allah” yelled “Allahu akbar” as he gunned down 13 American soldiers and wounded more than 30 others. The president failed to call the attack terrorism, hatred, or even gun violence. It was only “workplace violence.” The victims included African Americans but the president did not accuse Hasan of racism and in 2014 he declined to meet with Sgt. Alonzo Lunsford, who took seven bullets from the Muslim.

For vice president Joe Biden, the terrorist mass murder at Ford Hood was a “senseless tragedy” and the Delaware Democrat hailed “the brave soldiers who fell.” No word of how the soldiers “fell,” nor any hint that the terrorist mass murder could easily have been prevented.

As Lessons from Fort Hood explains, Hasan’s radical Islam was on full display during his training at Walter Reed Medical Center. The FBI was aware of Hasan’s communications with al Qaeda terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki about killing Americans. The Washington office of the FBI called off the surveillance and took no action against Hasan before his mass murder of American soldiers. The American-born Muslim was wounded but survived.

In 2016, Orlando police killed Omar Mateen, who did not act alone. As police learned, his wife, Noor Salman, helped Mateen case potential targets, including Downtown Disney, known for large crowds. In April, Walt Disney World told the FBI Mateen and Salman appeared to be conducting surveillance. Salman was also with Mateen when he purchased firearms and ammunition.

A week before the attack, Mateen asked her, “How bad would it be if a nightclub was attacked?” Orlando police chief John Mina knew “within days” that Salman had aided Mateen. On January 16, 2017, the FBI charged Salman with providing material support to a terrorist and obstruction of justice. Noor Salman admitted in court, “I wish I had been more truthful” and “I’m very sorry I lied to the FBI.” For those lapses, the terrorist’s wife would suffer no penalty.

In 2018, Salman was acquitted, another blow to families of the victims. Police Chief Mina told reporters “nothing can erase the pain we all feel” about the murders. They are still feeling it in 2021, five years after Orlando, with the White House occupied by the addled Joe Biden.

In the third term of the composite character president, Islamic jihadists and their abettors enjoy a target-rich environment. If they murder 49 people, including African Americans and homosexuals, they will not be called racists or homophobes. The administration will ignore their true motives and blame “weapons of war” or mental illness. The victims will be quickly forgotten and their loved ones ignored.

The 20th anniversary of 9/11 is coming up in September. To adapt Milan Kundera, the struggle against radical Islamic terrorism is the struggle of memory against forgetting.

Jews may be realizing that the Democrat party is not their friend

I have access to a Facebook group composed of strongly Democrat-voting Jewish Zionists.  It has been fascinating over the past six months watching them coming to come to terms with the fact that, no matter how much Democrats talk about "white supremacists," the only hatred for Jews and Israel is coming from people affiliated with the Democrat party.  This problem has accelerated for them in the wake of the recent fighting between Israel and her genocidal neighbors.

When I scroll through the Facebook page, more and more, these Zionist Democrats are posting things from conservative sites about the rising anti-Semitism in America or being forced to confront anti-Semitism in often celebrated members of their political party. Here's a sampling of what's they've posted about in just the past few days:

  • The accusation that progressivism caused the media to ignore entirely the anniversary of Israel's Six-Day War
  • Concern about the rising anti-Semitism in San Francisco, a city governed from the left.
  • Jewish Journal takedown of John Oliver for his attack against Israel.  Oliver is a darling of Democrats.
  • Thane Rosenbaum's attack on progressive politics with its relentless hatred for Israel and its strong support for an Arab people who oppose every progressive belief in America.
  • Kitty Hoffman's list of signs that anti-Semitism has long been rising in America, with many items on her list targeting ideas intrinsic to Critical Race Theory.  By citing this, Zionist Democrats are forced to confront the fact that the Democrats' support for CRT provides a foundation for anti-Semitism.
  • A Forward article castigating leftist — and New York Times darling — Thomas Friedman for being dangerously wrong about Israel.
  • challenge to the fact that the United Teachers of Los Angeles (the same leftist group that refused to return to the classroom) has suddenly weighed in on the Middle East conflict — against Israel, of course.
  • An open letter to another New York Times darling, Nicholas Kristof, attacking his anti-Israel positions.
  • An article describing how anti-Semitic Britain's Labor Party is.
  • The forum at which Bret Stephens, Bari Weiss, and Simone Rodan-Benzaquen talked about the mainstreaming of anti-Semitism, a talk that necessarily implicated the Democrats and that addressed the rising tide of minority anti-Semitism.
  • Daniel Greenfield's incredibly disturbing article about the anti-Semitism taking over Jewish studies.  Greenfield, for those who don't know, is a deeply conservative Orthodox Jew (and one of the best writers on the internet).
  • The conservative Gatestone Institute's article about the myriad problems with Biden's desperation to rejoin the Iran deal.
  • Pompeo's strong words about the Buhari government, which has done nothing to protect the 1,500 Christians slaughtered in the past six months.  (And surely my Democrat friends realize that the Biden administration has been silent.)

Several of them posted with approval Kathryn Wolf's The Screamers, in which she explained that, beginning in 2019, she was trying hard to counter rising anti-Semitism in Durham, North Carolina (a city that gave over 80% of its votes to Joe Biden).  Nobody in the Jewish community (which gave over 77% of its votes to Biden) wanted to acknowledge this problem.  And since then, she says, anti-Semitism is exploding — and every place she named (New York City, Alameda County, Columbia University, Brown University) is a Democrat redoubt.  Her point was that, at least in the circles in which she travels, if you're a Jew who fears anti-Semitism in America, "The cavalry is not coming.  We are the cavalry."  In other words, your fellow Democrats will not save you when the anti-Semitic mob beats down your door.

These Zionist Jews were deeply upset a few days ago at the way Rep. Ilhan Omar put out a tweet accusing Israel of "crimes against humanity" and the perpetrators of "unthinkable atrocities."  Yesterday, though, they were pleased that the House's Democrat leadership issued a legitimately good statement about Ilhan Omar's deplorable equivalency:

However, what my Jewish friends didn't mention is that only 12 Democrats out of the total of 219 Democrats in the House joined in.

On June 1, Joe Biden, the man my friends, like 77% of their co-religionists, desperately wanted in the White House, spoke in Tulsa.  Although his focus was primarily on Blacks, he managed to throw in a nod to "the various hate crimes against Asian Americans and Jewish Americans."  And then Biden said something that made sense:

I didn't realize hate is never defeated; it only hides.  It hides.  And given a little bit of oxygen — just a little bit oxygen — by its leaders, it comes out of there from under the rock like it was happening again, as if it never went away. And so, folks, we can't — we must not give hate a safe harbor.

What my Jewish friends are slowly being forced to face is that the Democrat party is the one providing tanks of oxygen to anti-Semitism, and turning each college, university, city, and county that votes Democrat into a safe harbor for the haters.

Images: Jews for Biden event poster.  Jewish Democrats.

JOE BIDEN'S SEC. OF OPEN BORDERS MAYORKAS SAYS ILLEGALS FIRST! - THE LAWS, LIKE AMERICA'S BORDERS TO DO APPLY TO THE LAWYER SWAMP OF JOE BIDEN

 THEY HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA HOW MANY WERE NEVER CAUGHT AT THE BORDER. THOSE THAT ARE CAUGHT ARE HANDED PLANE TICKETS TO ANYWHERE IN THE U.S. THEY WANT TO LIVE, WORK, AND COLLECT WELFARE

EXCLUSIVE: Border Patrol Got-Away Total Reaches 250K in 2021

A rancher's game-cam captures a group of migrants marching through his ranch to avoid a Border Patrol checkpoint. (Photo: Kinney County Sheriff's Office)
Photo: Kinney County Sheriff's Office
1:37

U.S. Customs and Border Protection will tally 250,000 migrant got-aways by June 13 for Fiscal Year 2021, according to an agency source speaking on the condition of anonymity. This figure represents the total number of migrants who avoid capture by the Border Patrol.

The total reached 200,000 in May. Nearly 50,000 escaped over the last 30 days. According to the source, on average, 1,600 migrants avoid capture daily.

In 2020, 69,000 migrants managed to avoid apprehension by the Border Patrol.

The metric is usually not publicly released. It is achieved by counting illegal immigrants who ultimately escape apprehension after being observed by aircraft and camera systems. Border Patrol agents also use traditional sign-cutting techniques to spot footprints. It is not a perfect investigative method. Sources say the got-away count is usually lower than reality.

Recent diversions of Border Patrol agents to humanitarian work in detention centers or stations is likely contributing to the surge in the got-away count.

Randy Clark is a 32-year veteran of the United States Border Patrol.  Prior to his retirement, he served as the Division Chief for Law Enforcement Operations, directing operations for nine Border Patrol Stations within the Del Rio, Texas, Sector. Follow him on Twitter @RandyClarkBBTX.

Watch – Mayorkas: Dignity of Migrants Is ‘Foremost’ DHS Priority

American Constitution Society
Volume 90%
13:17

The nation’s Department of Homeland Security will put the dignity of foreign migrants “foremost in our efforts,” agency chief Alejandro Mayorkas told an audience of left-wing lawyers on Tuesday.

Mayorkas described his “identity” as a champion for migrants in his speech to the 2021 American Constitutional Society (ACS) national convention:

The element of dignity [and] the rule of law. Those are two foundational guideposts as I seek to lead an agency, as we, as servants of the law, seek to bring justice in whatever we do. And here in the Department of Homeland Security, I think that must guide everything that we do.

Mayorkas portrayed himself as the guardian angel for an unknown number of non-Americans who might want to migrate into the United States, saying:

I want to read to you, as my final words, a note that we received at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, to speak of the impact on an individual to communicate what we can do to ensure that throughout our actions, we recognize and respect the dignity of every individual, and what it means to administer the rule of law in the best traditions of our country, and in adherence to the principles of our Constitution.

“Dear Mrs. Officer, I want to inform you that I received a letter of approval in regards for my application in this great humanitarian country. Madam, I want to thank you, and thank this great nation, for giving me a chance to find a refuge for my life  … May God bless you for being my guardian angel. And may God bless America for saving me.”

The benefit given to the migrant represents “the fundamental principle of dignity and the rule of law as an instrument deliberate,” said Mayorkas in his final sentence.

He did not reveal any plans to use that “instrument deliberate” to raise the dignity of Americans. But many millions of Americans face a loss of dignity as he extracts an endless flood of business-backed economic migrants  — at their great risk — to compete for the Americans’ jobs, homes, and opportunities.

Mayorkas’ 2,100-word speech did not mention the lost dignity of the many millions of Americans who have lost income and wealth amid the inrush of poor migrants waived in by lax enforcement. He did not mention the Americans victimized by undeported migrant criminals or by the addictive drugs being loosed in communities by Mayorkas’ lax rules. He did not mention the Americans cast aside by companies eager to exploit the cheap visa workers delivered by Mayorkas’ agency. And he did not suggest any debt of gratitude towards the Americans who accepted him as a child migrant in 1960.

In April, Mayorkas allowed roughly 90,000 additional economic migrants into the United States, atop the annual inflow of roughly one million legal immigrants and the churning population of roughly two million visa workers.

The New York Times reported on June 5 how a worker shortage and President Donald Trump’s “tight labor market” of 2019 is forcing companies to provide better pay and conditions to Americans. “The relationship between American businesses and their employees is undergoing a profound shift: For the first time in a generation, workers are gaining the upper hand,” the report said, adding “In effect, an entire generation of managers that came of age in an era of abundant workers is being forced to learn how to operate amid labor scarcity.”

So far, GOP legislators have chosen not to question Mayorkas about the economic impact of his policies on American voters and their families.

But Mayorkas suggested he identifies himself with migrants, not with Americans.

In his speech, he described the shock he felt when visiting a migrant camp in Kenya around 2010 that was filled with many thousands of destitute migrants from the chaotically diverse country of Somalia. He continued:

And I returned to the States asking a lot of fundamental questions, certainly about whether we could define ourselves as a civilized world or not, but also asking questions about myself … and the question of identity became much more profoundly important to me as an individual, as a son, as a brother, and as a father, and husband. But it also became very important to me, as a leader of an organization. And the issue of identity became the central question when we were wrestling with policy issues.

When we consider a particular policy question before us, doesn’t the answer help define our identity? Who we are, and more importantly, who we want to be?

Yet in February 2021, Mayorkas took office after swearing:

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Mayorkas does not see himself as an American, responded Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies:

He just does not consider himself to have any greater responsibility to his own country [than to other countries] …  It’s fundamentally contrary to the Constitution and to the idea of democratic governance, but it’s a consistent worldview. It is just not one that the people running a Republic have any business having.

In contrast, he added:

Most people see themselves as having a variety of obligations that spread out from their family. They have a greater obligation to their own family members than to their neighbors, a greater obligation to their neighbors than to strangers in their own country, a greater obligation to their countrymen — whether they know them personally or not — then to foreigners. That kind of hierarchy of obligations is just taken for granted by most people because it’s common sense.

The post-American perspective that Mayorkas exemplifies — but that really dominates this administration and most of the left at this point, and some of the right — is that there is no special obligation to your own country. They may even accept the idea that you have more responsibility to your own family members than to people who are strangers, but not that we as Americans have a responsibility to each other that is in any way different from the responsibility we have to people in Uruguay or Yemen.

Open borders is the Left’s version of an American empire, he said. “On the right, you’ve got Neocons who see the United States as the world’s policeman. On the left, they see the United States as the world’s social worker.”

Mayorkas is not an academic. He has a budget of more than $50 billion and is using his bureaucratic and regulatory powers to pull very many economic migrants through several small side doors in immigration law — even though Congress created those side doors for use by small numbers of persecuted asylum-seekersstranded travelersvictimized children, and injured voyagers.

Mayorkas used his speech to list the ways in which his offer of dignity to foreign migrants has changed the enforcement of the migration rules that exist to protect Americans’ right to their own society and their own national labor market.

President Donald Trump’s courts lawfully deported many economic migrants, but Mayorkas is using his parole power to nullify those courtroom decisions by helping some of them return to the United States: “We are reuniting the families with the sense of urgency that that mission deserves,” he said.

Undetained migrants may dodge enforcement rules to become illegal migrants. But Mayorkas has decided to shut down two detention centers because “I felt did not respect the dignity of the individuals who were in custody.”

Federal law describes illegal migrants as “illegal aliens.” But Mayorkas issued a directive saying, “we should refer to those individuals as ‘non-citizens’ to reflect that their lawful presence, or their unlawful presence in the United States does not define their dignity as individuals.”

Mayaorkas also cited “dignity” as a reason to provide migrant youths and children with legal aid that Congress has never funded.

The Trump administration’s “Public Charge” regulation fleshed out a long-standing law barring the award of green cards to migrants who would rely on taxpayer aid. Mayorkas has stopped enforcing the rule: “I felt, and we collectively in the Department felt, that the rescission of that rule would not only restore dignity to the process, but adhere to the rule of law.”

Mayorkas is providing work permits to at least 600,000 people who were brought to the United States as children by illegal migrants, despite the uncertain status of that claimed power. “We reinstituted and are strengthening the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA program,” he said.

Border guards and immigration enforcement officers may injure the dignity of migrants if the “articulation of ideologies of hate” is directed at migrants, he said. “We have a responsibility to make sure that that integrity is unencroached and has the confidence of the public,” he added.

“Even in the battle against COVID, issues of dignity are foremost in our efforts,” he said, as he sketched his determination to provide taxpayer-funded aid to migrants without regard to their legal right to be in the United States. Federal agencies “have gone into those communities and ensured our accessibility to those communities to ensure that not only our efforts but their needs receive the dignity they deserve,” he said.

Mayorkas made little or no distinction between Americans and foreigners throughout his speech or between legal immigrants and illegal migrants. He even suggested that the agency is intended to serve migrants — not the 330 million Americans who need secure borders and protect labor rights:

In the government, we have the privilege of seeking to make systemic change, to bring dignity, or I should say, to reflect in what we do, reflect the dignity of the people we serve on a very impactful and systemic basis. But we cannot forget that the rule of law, that the law as an instrument of delivering dignity, can bring that to the single individual. And we cannot understate the importance of doing so. And I think that sometimes the impact on one individual can reverberate throughout an entire institution and bring systemic change.

The emphasis on “people we serve” was added by the DHS transcript of the speech.

Government progressives on the left, Krikorian said:

See American immigration policy as social welfare [for the world] and they see their customers as the foreigners want to move here — instead of the American people whom they actually work for.

Mayorkas may not see any conflict between his identity as a champion for migrants dignity and his official duties in a U.S. administration, Krikorian said, adding:

He doesn’t dwell on what the effect [his pro-migrant policy] has on Americans, and if he were pressed, he would say, “Well, it’s good for everybody, you know, a rising tide raises all boats and we all benefit from this.” That’s more of a psychological coping mechanism … He kind of thinks that his goal of vindicating the dignity of foreigners around the world is also good for Americans. That’s empirically untrue, but besides that, from his perspective, it’s an afterthought.

But that conflict is made clear by President Joe Biden’s poor polling on immigration and Biden’s own desire for a Trump-like tight labor market.

Biden explained his support for the long-standing and very popular goal of a tight labor market in a May 28 speech:

Rising wages aren’t a bug; they’re a feature.  We want to get — we want to get something economists call “full employment.”  Instead of workers competing with each other for jobs that are scarce, we want employees to compete with each other to attract wrk.  We want the — the companies to compete to attract workers.

[…]

Well, wait until you see what happens when employers have to compete for workers.  Companies like McDonald’s, Home Depot, Bank of America, and others — what do they have to do?  They have to raise wages to attract workers.  That’s the way it’s supposed to be.

Mayorkas is an avid proponent of the Cold War claim that Americans’ homeland is a “Nation of Immigrants.”

This claim is contradicted by many years of polling by a wide variety of pollsters, which show deepnon-partisan, and broad opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

This opposition is multiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-basedbipartisanrationalpersistent, and recognizes the solidarity Americans owe to each other.

Migration moves money from employees to employers, from families to investors, from young to old, from children to their parents, from homebuyers to investors, from technology to stoop labor, from red states to blue states, and from the central states to the coastal states such as New York.

The voter opposition to elite-backed economic migration coexists with support for legal immigrants and some sympathy for illegal migrants. But only a minority of Americans — mostly leftists — embrace the many skewed polls pushing the 1950’s corporate “Nation of Immigrants” claim.