UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF
ILLEGALS!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-war-on-american-worker-he-calls.html
OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON THE
AMERICAN WORKER AND AMNESTY TO BUILD THE DEMS’ LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS –
IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH ENDLESS HORDES OF MEXICANS.
WHEN OBAMA MADE
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS SEC. of ILLEGAL LABOR, HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS
DOING. BUYING VOTES OF ILLEGALS WITH OUR JOBS.
WHEN OBAMA
NOMINATED SELF-STYLED “WISE LATINA” SONIA SOTOMAYER TO THE HIGH COURT, HE KNEW
WHAT HE WAS DOING. SOTOMAYER VOTED AGAINST E-VERIFY!
WHEN OBAMA SUED
THE STATE OF ARIZONA TO BLOCK E-VERIFY, HE KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING.
…IT’S ALL ABOUT PUTTING ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS
TO BUY THEIR VOTES AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
THERE ARE ONLY
EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE 90% OF
THE SERVICE AND CONSTRUCTION SECTOR JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBERS. THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON
WELFARE, AND ENJOYS A TAX-FREE MEXICAN UNDERGROUND ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE IN
EXCESS OF $2 BILLION PER YEAR!
Two-thirds of jobs go
to immigrants during Obama’s four years
Researchers say legals
and illegals are more mobile than natives in America
The Washington Times
October 31, 2012
Two-thirds of those who have found employment under President
Obama are immigrants, both legal and illegal, according to an analysis that
suggests immigration has soaked up a large portion of what little job growth
there has been over the past three years.
The Center for Immigration Studies is releasing the study Thursday
morning, a day ahead of the final Labor Department unemployment report of the
campaign season, which is expected to show a sluggish job market more than
three years into the economic recovery.
That slow market, combined with the immigration numbers, could
explain why Mr. Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney have struggled to find
a winning jobs message in some of the country's hardest-hit postindustrial
regions.
"It's extraordinary that most of the employment growth in the
last four years has gone to the foreign-born, but what's even more
extraordinary is the issue has not even come up during a presidential election
that is so focused on jobs," said Steven A. Camarota, the center's
research director, who wrote the report along with demographer Karen Zeigler.
His numbers are stark: Since the first quarter of 2009, the number
of immigrants of working age (16 to 65) who are employed has risen 2 million,
from 21.2 million to 23.2 million. During the same time, native-born employment
has risen just 1 million, to reach 119.9 million.
It's a trend years in the making: Immigrants are working more, and
native-born Americans are working less.
In 2000, 76 percent of natives aged 18 to 65 were employed, but
that dropped steadily to 69 percent this September. By contrast, immigrants
started the last decade at 71 percent employment and rose to a peak of 74
percent at the height of the George W. Bush-era economic boom. They since have
slid down to 69 percent amid the sluggish economy.
Competitive advantage
The Center for Immigration Studies, which wants the government to
impose stricter limits on immigration, based its numbers on the Census Bureau's
Current Population Survey.
Alex Nowrasteh, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute, which
favors letting the markets rather than the government control the flow of
immigration, said Mr. Camarota's numbers are "making a mountain out of a
molehill."
He said delving into specific numbers explains why immigrants have
done better over the past four years: They generally gravitate toward parts of
the economy that have picked up faster in the nascent recovery.
"Most of the areas of the U.S. economy that are hiring right
now, like agriculture and high-tech industries, are those where immigrants have
always been overly represented," Mr. Nowrasteh said.
He also said immigrants are quicker to jump into the rebounding
job market while native-born Americans, who under federal law have more welfare
options and access to unemployment benefits, are slower to find work.
Mr. Nowrasteh and Mr. Camarota said another factor could be
immigrants' mobility.
Natives have roots wherever they live, and it may take higher
wages to get them to move for jobs, even if their homes are in depressed areas.
Immigrants already have uprooted themselves and can more easily pick places
where jobs are available.
Indeed, Mr. Camarota's numbers show that most of the immigrant
employment growth went to new arrivals, not to foreign-born residents already
in the United States — a figure that suggests immigrants already settled here
were having some of the same difficulties as the native-born.
There is some bright news: an uptick over the past year among
native-born Americans accounting for two-thirds of all new employment growth.
Full overhaul
Net immigration — both legal and illegal — averaged more than 1.1
million in the 1990s and slightly less than 900,000 in the past decade.
Mr. Camarota said it didn't slow much despite the economic
downturn.
"We have a situation
where the job market — the bottom fell out, yet we kept legal immigration
relatively high without even a national debate," he said. "As a
consequence, a lot of the job growth has been going to immigrants."
Immigration has been a touchy political issue for more than a
decade, and while all sides agree that the system is broken, efforts to overhaul
it in 2006 and 2007 fell short.
This campaign, Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama have talked about
streamlining the legal immigration system to allow in more high-tech workers.
Mr. Romney has said he wants to "staple a green card" to every
advanced degree in science, mathematics or engineering earned by an immigrant.
Beyond that, Mr. Obama has vowed to make legalizing illegal
immigrants a major push in a second term — and has said if he wins re-election,
he thinks Republicans will embrace that goal, realizing that otherwise,
Hispanic voters will reject the GOP.
Mr. Romney has talked about legalizing a small number of illegal
immigrants, though he has been studiously vague about his specific plans in an
effort to try not to alienate voters on either side of the issue.
Mr. Obama did take action
this year to grant many illegal immigrants up to 30 years of age a tentative
legal status that prevents them from being deported and authorizes them to work
in the United States.
Some Republicans in
Congress have criticized Mr. Obama's policy, saying it violates his powers and
will mean more competition for scarce jobs.
Mr. Romney has said he would not rescind any stays of deportation
that Mr. Obama issues but wouldn't issue any new ones himself.
The current system doles out legal visas based on family ties or
employment prospects or even a random lottery designed to increase the
diversity of those coming to the United States.
In 2007, senators proposed scrapping the legal system and
replacing it with a points-based system that would assign a desirability grade
to would-be immigrants. Work skills would have gained under that system.
But that proposal, along with the rest of the bill, collapsed amid
a bipartisan Senate filibuster.
Mr. Nowrasteh at the Cato Institute said those decisions shouldn't
be left up to bureaucrats anyway.
"The government can't pick winners and losers when it comes
to green-energy firms like Solyndra, so what makes you think it can pick
winners and losers when it comes to immigration?" he asked rhetorically.
Read more: Two-thirds of jobs go to immigrants during Obama's four years - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/31/two-thirds-of-jobs-go-to-immigrants/print/#ixzz2AysMQrGn
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
Why the new
jobs go to immigrants
By David R. Francis
Wall Street
cheered and stock prices rose when the US Labor Department announced last
Friday that employers had expanded their payrolls by 262,000 positions in
February.
But it
wasn't entirely good news. The statisticians also indicated that the share of
the adult population holding jobs had slipped slightly from January to 62.3
percent. That's now two full percentage points below the level in the
brief recession that began in March 2001.
Why the
apparent contradiction? Reasons abound: population growth, rising retirements.
But one factor that gets little attention is immigration.
In the past
four years, the number of immigrants into the US, legal and illegal, has
closely matched the number of new jobs. That suggests newcomers have, in
effect, snapped up all of the new jobs.
"There
has been no net job gain for natives," says Andrew Sum, an economist at
Northeastern University.
In the
US, President Bush calls for giving millions of illegal immigrants a kind of
guest-worker status as a legal path to US citizenship. So far, no specific
legislation to implement his suggestion has been put before Congress.
Meanwhile,
US border patrols spend millions of dollars a year trying to keep illegals out.
And yet, they keep coming, evidently little discouraged by recession or the
9/11 attacks. In the past four years alone, the number of immigrants ran some
2.5 million to 3 million, of which about half were illegal.
They
come for jobs, of course. And the Bush administration makes barely any effort
to enforce current law. In 2003, a total of 13 employers were fined for hiring
undocumented employees.
In fact,
neither Republicans nor Democrats have promoted enforcement of immigration law
prohibiting the hiring of illegal immigrants, says Mr. Sum, head of
Northeastern's Center for Labor Market Studies.
What
employers really want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage
costs, experts say.
Most Mexican
Immigrants in New Study Gave Up Jobs to Take Their Chances in U.S.
By NINA BERNSTEIN
New York Times
A report about the work lives of
recent Mexican immigrants in seven cities across the United States suggests
that they typically traded jobs in Mexico for the prospect of work here, despite serious bouts of
unemployment, job instability and poor wages.
The report, released Tuesday by
the Pew Hispanic Center, was based on surveys of nearly 5,000 Mexicans, most of
them here illegally.
Those surveyed were seeking
identity documents at Mexican consulates in New York, Atlanta and Raleigh,
N.C., where recent arrivals have gravitated toward construction, hotel and
restaurant jobs, and in Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Fresno, Calif., where
they have been more likely to work in agriculture and manufacturing.
Unlike the stereotype of jobless
Mexicans heading north, most of the immigrants had been employed in Mexico, the
report found.
Once in the United States, they
soon found that their illegal status was no barrier to being hired here. And
though the jobs they landed, typically with help from relatives, were often
unstable and their median earnings only $300 a week, that was enough to keep
drawing newcomers because wages here far exceeded those in Mexico.
"We're getting a peek at a
segment of the U.S. labor force that is large, that is growing by illegal
migration, and that is bringing an entirely new set of issues into the U.S.
labor market," said Rakesh Kochhar, associate director for research at the
Pew Hispanic Center and author of the study.
The report suggested that policies
intended to reduce migration pressures by improving the Mexican economy would
have to look beyond employment to wages and perceptions of opportunity.
The survey found that the most
recent to arrive were more likely to have worked in construction or commerce,
rather than agriculture, in Mexico. Only 5 percent had been unemployed there;
they were "drawn not from the fringes, but from the heart of Mexico's
labor force," the report said.
After a difficult transition in
their first six months in the United States - about 15 percent of the
respondents said they did not work during that time - the rate of unemployment
plummeted, to an average of 5 percent.
But in one of the most striking
findings, 38 percent reported an unemployment spell lasting a month or more in
the previous year, regardless of their location, legal status or length of time
in the United States.
"These are workers with no
safety net," Mr. Kochhar said. "The long-run implication is a
generation of workers without health or pension benefits, without any
meaningful asset accumulation."
On the other hand, Mr. Kochhar and
Roberto Suro, director of the Pew Hispanic Center, said the flexibility of this
work force was a boon to certain industries like home construction, an
important part of the nation's economic growth since the last recession.
Among respondents to the survey,
those who settled in Atlanta and Dallas were the best off, with 56 percent in
each city receiving a weekly wage higher than the $300-a-week median. The worst
off were in Fresno, where more than half of the survey respondents worked in
agriculture and 60 percent reported earning less than $300 a week. The lowest
wages were reported by women, people who spoke little or no English, and those
without identification.
To some scholars of immigration,
the report underlines the lack of incentives for employers to turn to a guest
worker program like the one proposed by President Bush because their needs are
met cheaply by illegal workers - and all without paperwork or long-term
commitment.
Guest workers might instead appeal
to corporations like Wal-Mart, the scholars said, where service jobs are now
the target of union organizing drives.
"You can't plausibly argue
that immigrant-dominated sectors have a labor shortage," said Robert
Courtney Smith, a sociologist and author of "Mexican New York:
Transnational Lives of New Immigrants." Instead, he said, the report and
evidence of falling wages among Mexican immigrants over time point to an
oversupply of vulnerable workers competing with each other.
But Brendan Flanagan, a spokesman
for the National Restaurant Association, which supports a guest worker program,
disagreed. "In many places it is difficult to fill jobs with domestic
workers," Mr. Flanagan said. "We've seen a simple lack of applicants,
regardless of what wage is offered."
Although the survey, conducted
from July 2004 to January 2005, was not random or weighted to represent all
Mexican immigrants, it offers a close look at a usually elusive population.
Those surveyed were not questioned
directly about their immigration status, but they were asked whether they had
any photo identification issued by a government agency in the United States.
Slightly more than half over all, and 75 percent in New York, said they did
not.
The migration is part of a
historic restructuring of the Mexican economy comparable to America's
industrial revolution, said Kathleen Newland, director of the Migration Policy
Institute, a research organization based in Washington.
The institute released its own
report on Tuesday, arguing that border enforcement efforts have failed.
Workplace enforcement, which has been neglected, would be a crucial part of
making a guest worker program successful.
For now, Mexicans keep arriving
illegally.
"It doesn't matter if it's
winter," said Ricardo Cortes, 23, a construction worker waiting for a
friend outside the Mexican consulate in New York on Tuesday. "People are
still coming because there's no money over there."
*
IMPORTING THIRD-WORLDERS TO TAKE OUR
JOBS, AND KEEPING THE BORDERS OPEN WITH NARCOMEX FOR HORDES MORE ILLEGALS IS
ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED SO THE POLITICIANS WILL ARE SERVICING THEIR
CORPORATE PAYMASTERS WITH DEPRESSED WAGES!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, April 20, 2009
And compelling new evidence that H-1B visas for foreign workers lower the pay of information technology workers in this country. Critics say the report, by NYU’s Stern School of Business and Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, proves that corporate elites are importing cheap overseas labor simply to lower the wages of American workers. We’ll have a special report.
Monday, April 20, 2009
And compelling new evidence that H-1B visas for foreign workers lower the pay of information technology workers in this country. Critics say the report, by NYU’s Stern School of Business and Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, proves that corporate elites are importing cheap overseas labor simply to lower the wages of American workers. We’ll have a special report.
“Mr. Rob Sanchez of Arizona, showed how H-1b
and L-1 visas have ripped one million high tech jobs out of American worker's
hands. Another
speaker told a packed audience how 'offshoring' and 'outsourcing', fully
supported by the president and congress have cost over three million American
jobs in the past six years.”
*
Study: Foreign-born workers gain 656,000
jobs
By Morgan Lee
Friday, October 29, 2010 at 10:46 p.m.
Signs On San Diego
Immigrants have gained more than 600,000 jobs since the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, according to a newly released study.
Native-born workers fared far worse, shedding 1.5 million jobs, according to an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center of U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Labor data.
Foreign-born workers picked up 656,000 jobs over the 12-month period, driving down that population's unemployment rate half a point to 8.7 percent. Immigrant workers make up 15.7 percent of the labor force.
The gains, however, were not nearly enough to make up for 1.1 million jobs lost among immigrants from second-quarter 2008 through second-quarter 2009. And immigrants experienced a sharp decline in median weekly earnings -- down 4.5 percent., compared to a loss of less than 1 percent for the native born.
"The unemployment rate for immigrants is still more than double the rate prior to the recession when it stood at 4.0 percent in the second quarter of 2007," the study said.
Released on Friday, the report was not able to separately identify illegal immigrants because that status was not recorded in the source data. It found that Hispanic immigrants experienced the largest drop in earnings of all ethnic and racial groups.
The report focused on the period from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, when most of the job losses during the recession occurred, and the subsequent 12 months that marked the first year of recovery from the recession.
DISCUSS THIS EXPLOSIVE NEWS WITH OUR ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT...
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?/>
By Morgan Lee
Friday, October 29, 2010 at 10:46 p.m.
Signs On San Diego
Immigrants have gained more than 600,000 jobs since the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, according to a newly released study.
Native-born workers fared far worse, shedding 1.5 million jobs, according to an analysis by the Pew Hispanic Center of U.S. Census Bureau and Department of Labor data.
Foreign-born workers picked up 656,000 jobs over the 12-month period, driving down that population's unemployment rate half a point to 8.7 percent. Immigrant workers make up 15.7 percent of the labor force.
The gains, however, were not nearly enough to make up for 1.1 million jobs lost among immigrants from second-quarter 2008 through second-quarter 2009. And immigrants experienced a sharp decline in median weekly earnings -- down 4.5 percent., compared to a loss of less than 1 percent for the native born.
"The unemployment rate for immigrants is still more than double the rate prior to the recession when it stood at 4.0 percent in the second quarter of 2007," the study said.
Released on Friday, the report was not able to separately identify illegal immigrants because that status was not recorded in the source data. It found that Hispanic immigrants experienced the largest drop in earnings of all ethnic and racial groups.
The report focused on the period from the second quarter of 2008 to the second quarter of 2009, when most of the job losses during the recession occurred, and the subsequent 12 months that marked the first year of recovery from the recession.
DISCUSS THIS EXPLOSIVE NEWS WITH OUR ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT...
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?/>
*
The danger, as Washington
Post economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing
poverty” in the form of a new underclass—a permanent group of working poor.
*
“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus.
“President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration.
The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants
find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration
laws.”
*
“Obama’s
rejection of any serious jobs program is part of a conscious class war policy.
Two years after the financial crisis and the multi-trillion dollar bailout of
the banks, the administration is spearheading a campaign by corporations to
sharply increase the exploitation of the working class, using the “new normal”
of mass unemployment to force workers to accept lower wages, longer hours, and
more brutal working conditions.” WSWS.ORG
*
“The
principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent
Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard
economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion
annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market
at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor
MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO LA RAZA – THE MEXICAN
FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY. THESE FIGURES ARE DATED. CNN CALCULATES THAT WAGES ARE
DEPRESSED $300 - $400 BILLION PER YEAR!
HERE’S HOW NO E-VERIFY BREAKS
DOWN:
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
CA MAKES E-VERIFY
ILLEGAL! COURTESY THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California...
You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.
"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted...."Jose Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year
Now take 30% away for state and federal tax
Joe Legal now has $31,231.00
Jose Illegal...$15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year
Jose Illegal pays no taxes...
Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage
$1000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $19,231.00
Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal makes too much money is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare
Joe Legal pays for food
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $ 7,231.00
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays rent of
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal is now in the hole... minus (-) $4,769.00
Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy
Jose Illegal pays rent
$500.00 per month
$6,000.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $25,200.00
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch.
Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...
Its WAY PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
*
Why
the illegals must go!
April 19, 2007
by William Gheen
President, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
www.alipac.us
April 19, 2007
by William Gheen
President, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
www.alipac.us
Today, Americans face
an unprecedented illegal immigration crisis facilitated by multi-billion dollar
drug and human importing cartels as well as corporations which are inducing the
invasion by aiding and abetting illegal aliens and using their influence on the
Executive Branch and elections to paralyze existing immigration laws supported
by over 80% of the American citizenry.
These events are not random and chaotic. Massive
illegal immigration is the result of non-enforcement and under-enforcement of
our existing immigration laws.
Supporters of illegal aliens love to claim that our
immigration system is broken. The system is not broken. Elite financial and
political business interests who could care less about the death and
devastation they are causing Americans have sabotaged the system. Their profits
continue to rise as they send the rest of America spiraling downward on a path
to anarchy and Third World quality-of-life conditions.
By using their influence to suspend our existing
laws, these globalist special interests have deprived all Americans of
political representation as well as their votes, their voice, and a functioning
Republic for which our flag stands.
When the laws of the American people – debated and
voted on by their duly-elected Congressional Representatives and signed into
law by the President– go intentionally under-enforced by the Executive Branch,
all of the principles, sovereignty, and self-governance of Americans are
derailed. The will of the American public, the existing laws, the US
Constitution, and the borders of our great nation are perceived as market
hindrances to the global elite. We the people of America are perceived as
peasants and subjects beneath the power of their influence.
The American public has spoken through our lawmakers
and in numerous polls. A super majority of Americans want our existing laws
enforced, those responsible for illegal immigration fined and/or imprisoned,
the borders secured, and illegal aliens deported from the United States for
many years or permanently. These fact remain, despite several politicized polls
which attempt to manufacture consent and make you believe such views represent
a minority.
The truth is that most Americans want the illegal
aliens to return to the nations of which they are citizens. The rallying cry
is: "Illegals Go Home!"
We could easily list 101 reasons why Americans are
upset about illegal immigration. Most are concerned about the 4,000+
preventable deaths of Americans by the criminal acts of illegal aliens on our
soil each year. No corporate propaganda will change the fact that most
Americans do not want to surrender or capitulate to the lawless masses rushing
into our nation.
No poll or politicized source is needed to prove
this point because the decision is based upon our nation's successful history
and basic common sense. The answer is based on something that every judge,
lawmaker, and even street thug knows. The penalties must outweigh the benefits
if you want to deter any action.
It is common sense and common practice in America
that for any law to be a deterrent, two important factors are in play. First,
the laws must be enforced, and second, the penalties for any crime must exceed
the benefits to those breaking the law.
It is truly amazing that we find ourselves as a
nation having to explain these basic foundations of law to corporations and
politicians in the year 2007 despite their existence since the dawn of
civilization! Can you imagine what would happen in America if the penalty for
robbing a bank was that you had to return half of the money you stole if, and
only if, you were apprehended for the crime? What if the penalty for car theft
was paying a $2,000 fine if you were caught with the stolen vehicle?
The answers are clear. Within a month, you would
not have a bank open in America and you would not be able to keep a car worth
more than $2,000 in your driveway for more than a week. How many millions of
people would quickly take up the careers of bank robber and car thief once the
rewards for the crime were higher than the penalty?
If American businesses and homes left their windows
and doors unlocked each night and robbers were merely removed by police when
detected – only to try again the next night – what do you think would happen?
If big, global businesses practiced the same non-enforcement of security
similar to the lack of border security and lack of immigration enforcement they
have facilitated for Americans, they would be out of business in a matter of
days or weeks. If they left their doors unlocked at night and just pushed
people back to the street, America would quickly descend into such chaos and
anarchy that we would be unable to sustain a population of 300 million. Our
population would take a hit similar to the impact of the Black Plague on
Europe, and we would quickly enter a new dark age.
Since illegal aliens can never afford to compensate
Americans for what they have taken, they must go. We do not need to go door to
door looking for illegals to deport in America. Attrition through enforcement
works. Illegal aliens are leaving the states of Georgia and Pennsylvania in
droves, not because they are enforcing the laws but because they have simply
announced they plan to start!
Unfortunately, the current state of affairs in America has illegals flooding in by the millions each year and many law-abiding Americans fleeing the states of California and Texas and many towns and cities in search of more safety and security. Many Americans are on the run and finding few places left to run to.
Unfortunately, the current state of affairs in America has illegals flooding in by the millions each year and many law-abiding Americans fleeing the states of California and Texas and many towns and cities in search of more safety and security. Many Americans are on the run and finding few places left to run to.
The illegal aliens are sending a clear message on
the streets of Los Angeles and other major urban centers. They are saying:
"This is our land. White, black, and legal Hispanics get out!"
This is great news for the housing and real estate markets, Wal-Mart, and McDonalds. They are growing the economy using rapid population growth. This is great news for big corporations and bad news for Americans.
Attrition through enforcement will work. In fact,
if President George Bush were to announce on national television that America
would begin securing our borders and enforcing our existing laws in one month,
so many illegal aliens would leave America that Mexico would have to set up
refuge stations!
Another important reason that the illegal aliens must leave for the long term is that they'll return to their home communities with a message for their neighbors that their ill-gotten gains did not pay off in America. This is the only thing that will stop, or slow, the flow. Deporting illegal aliens and sending them packing is the only real way we can put a stop to this crisis.
The politicians in DC are very aware that Americans
want the illegal aliens to go. That is why their latest Scamnesty legislation
includes a “touchback”provision. Under these laws, the illegal aliens can hop
across the Mexican or Canadian borders where special "Ellis Island"
stations are set up for them to pay a fine, receive new documentation and be
back in the US within days or hours.
The lunatics advocating this plan are counting on Americans to be so stupid and so gullible that they can say, "Look, the illegals left and walked back in legally. Problem solved!" They are eager to pretend to accommodate the American desires for the illegals to leave while quickly returning their slave labor force to our nation.
They know that Americans want illegals to leave and
get behind a long line of legal immigrants waiting to enter the US, including
millions of people who have been waiting 5-10 years. These politicians and the
illegal aliens need to be shown the way to the back of the line. The back of
the line is back in the country in which they are citizens, 5-10 years down the
road behind all of the talented and law-abiding people who respect our laws.
If these traitorous corporations and politicians
succeed in setting up these Ellis Island stations for “Operation
Touchback," the revered symbol of Ellis Island will take on a new meaning
that Americans see with contempt and resentment. Ellis Island will become a
name associated with the horrendous betrayal of free Americans and the
deathblow to the American Republic. This is a symbol of America’s surrender and
the subjugation of all her people.
If we allow the politicians in DC to sign off on
the many Guest Worker, Temporary Worker, Path to Citizenship, Amnesty, Scamnesty
bills written by the US Chamber of Commerce, then no wall with an army on top
of it will stop the next 20 million from crashing down on our country. We will
have signaled that America is weak and will capitulate and accommodate.
Already, the word is out in Central and South America that they can come and
stay. Each time President Bush has opened his mouth about such programs, the US
Border Patrol reports massive spikes in illegal crossings.
Since there is literally no end to the stream of
illegals who want to be in America, this will be the end of America as we have
known it and as history has praised it.
In the past, when America has cracked down on
illegal immigration and the American people have signaled they want the
immigration brakes applied, the policies have worked. New laws written near the
turn of the 20th century greatly reduced the amount of immigration into
America. When Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower launched
large deportation campaigns in the 1950s and 1930s, illegal immigration slowed
to minuscule levels as a result.
Whether you agree or disagree with the decisions of
the past, these policies were part of the successful formula that have led
America to become the most opulent and successful civilization in human history.
While some argue that these enforcement measures were racist and that some American citizens of different races were improperly deported at the time, we now have the technology and methodology in place to assure that American citizens and legal immigrants are not improperly affected by our immigration enforcement efforts.
The difference in 2007 is that the globalist
corporations that have hijacked the American government want to stop the
American citizenry from applying the brakes this time. They have taken away our
ability to determine who can enter our nation and our ability to stop armed and
unarmed invasions as granted by the US Constitution.
To take away the self-governance of Americans is to kill the very thing that has made us such a great and successful nation.
In a time of crisis like this, we must stand firm
on the principles that have made America an attractive and great nation. We
must stand firm on the rule of law. The law must be applied equally to big
corporations and illegal aliens alike lest we all become slaves subject to the
plans of masters instead of a free and empowered citizenry.
Illegal aliens and corporations must endure penalties for their illegal, deadly, and destructive actions that exceed the benefits they gain from their illegal activities.
The hour is late and it is time for Americans to
stand up and say with one voice...
No Amnesty! No Guest Worker! Secure our borders and enforce the existing laws! Restore the American Republic!
*
WAS FROSTY WOOLDRIDGE’S
PREDICTION ACCURATE?
"An
autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide." SURRENDERING OUR NATION TO THE MEXICAN
INVASION
*
Even with the
facade of Tom Ridge's Homeland Security, 800,000 illegal aliens continue
walking, crawling or tunneling across the Mexican border annually. Their
accelerating numbers undermine America's ability to function.
*
Another speaker told a packed audience how 'offshoring' and
'outsourcing', fully supported by the president and congress have cost over
three million American jobs in the past six years.
*
How to Destroy America
Article by Frosty Wooldridge
(DO YOU THINK THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION
AND EVER EXPANDING WELFARE “SANCTUARY” STATE IS GREATER THAN 2003?
October 31, 2003
In Washington, DC, several weeks ago, an
immigration-overpopulation conference was filled to capacity by many of
America’s finest minds and leaders. Writers, speakers, CEO's, representatives
from Congress such as Tom Tancredo as well as former governors graced the
podium. Bonnie Eggle, mother of the national parks ranger Kris Eggle, slain by
Mexican drug runners last year on our unguarded southern border--gave a
compelling speech that left not one dry eye in the place. Peter Gadiel, father
of Jamie Gadiel, spoke powerfully on how the World Trade Center took his son
and how nothing has been done since--to stop the flow of illegal immigration
into the United States. Even with the
facade of Tom Ridge's Homeland Security, 800,000 illegal aliens continue
walking, crawling or tunneling across the Mexican border annually. Their
accelerating numbers undermine America's ability to function.
During the conference, speaker after speaker astounded the
audience with facts on how fast the present administration and congress
continue dismantling the American Dream for average citizens. Mr. Rob Sanchez of Arizona, showed how H-1b and L-1 visas have ripped
one million high tech jobs out of American worker's hands. Another speaker told a packed audience how 'offshoring' and
'outsourcing', fully supported by the president and congress have cost over
three million American jobs in the past six years. His prediction
was even more depressing: "In excess of three million more jobs will be
'outsourced' within four years. Those American jobs are headed to Mexico,
India, China, Pakistan and Brazil."
*
THE REALITY OF OBAMA’S INSOURCING US INTO A THIRD WORLD DUMPSTER THAT WILL KEEP
HIS WALL STREET PAYMASTERS HAPPY AND GENEROUS!
"Wage-cutting, speedup and the imposition of sweat shop conditions are at the heart of Obama’s strategy for doubling US exports by 2015. He has repeatedly boasted of his administration’s success in “insourcing” jobs back to the US, omitting to mention that these jobs often pay half their previous wage."
*
President Obama is AWOL on the biggest
issue of all JOBS!
Published
August 23, 2012
advertisement
Thursday’s jobless numbers and Wednesday’s CBO report are
beyond ominous and present a direct challenge to the rationale for Barack
Obama’s presidency.
Before
President Obama took office, he vilified President Bush for adding $4 trillion
to our nation’s debt as “unpatriotic.” If Bush’s spending over the course of two
terms was “unpatriotic,” Obama adding nearly $5.3 trillion to the national debt
in half this time is not only “unpatriotic,” it’s also hypocritical. It
displays an utter disregard for financial health of this country.
Obama pledged to cut the deficit in half by 2012, but instead has increased
spending so rapidly that our nation has surpassed the $16 trillion
threshold. He and his ObamaClones in the Senate continue to call
for even more liberal deficit spending.
Senate
Democrats have enabled Obama by refusing to produce a budget for over three
years. This is a complete dereliction of duty on the part of Majority Leader
Harry Reid. The Senate is mandated to produce a budget but has failed to
do so for almost the entire time Obama has been in office.
Democratic
Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia expressed rare honesty in saying he was at
a loss to explain why his fellow Democrats have gone along with this. The
former governor even said if he had done this while governor of his state, he
would’ve been impeached.
It’s
an absolute disgrace that the last time the Senate passed a
budget was
on April 29, 2009. Since this resolution—which aimed to cut the deficit by
two-thirds by 2014—the deficit has increased
by $4.8 trillion.
Obama and
his enablers in the Senate refuse to do their jobs and idly stand by as our
nation teeters on the fiscal cliff. The American people not only deserve
to know how the politicians in Washington are spending their tax dollars, they
also deserve representatives who do the job they were elected to do.
Do we
need more evidence that Obama doesn’t take fiscal responsibility
seriously? His last budget proposal was shot down by both Democrats and
Republicans in both houses of Congress: 414-0 in the House of Representatives
and 99-0 in the Senate. When was the last time—if ever—you had a national,
unanimous repudiation of this magnitude?
Both
Obama and Reid must be held accountable for failing to do their jobs. The
same goes for other enablers in the Senate such as Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Claire
McCaskill (D-Mo.), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) – all of
whom are up for re-election this year.
Additionally,
former Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine (D-Va.) is running for
the Senate in Virginia, and he has continually supported all of Obama’s
policies which have driven our country deeper in debt. Mr. Kaine needs to
answer for this if he wants the voters to support him. He is not exempt.
Obama
declared that Stimulus One (a trillion dollars of taxpayer money) would get the
economy back on track. It was a miserable failure. When that didn’t
work, he threw more tax dollars at more failed projects in Stimulus Two.
Back in
February 2009, Obama said that as president he would be held accountable.
He said that if the economy didn’t recover in three years, his presidency would be a “one-term
proposition.”
Come
November, the American people will remember Obama’s proclamation. They
will also remember that this administration has engaged in the most reckless
deficit spending in history which has grown the federal debt over $16
trillion.
At some
point, the public’s patience will wear out unless Obama changes his spending
ways and both he and his party begin to take this problem seriously.
Don’t bet on this. You’ll be as successful as Obama and the Democrats
have been lately.
Brent
Bozell is chairman and CEO of ForAmerica.org, the largest online
conservative army in America with 2.5 million supporters.
*
latimes.com
latimes.com
U.S.
jobs continue to flow overseas
Though
some companies have actually moved operations back to American shores recently,
the lure of cheaper labor in China, India and other foreign countries is more
irresistible than ever.
By Don Lee, Los
Angeles Times
October 6, 2010
Reporting from
Washington
One in a series of
occasional reports about the U.S. unemployment crisis.
Though some American
firms are bringing overseas work back home, evidence is growing that companies
are moving more jobs than ever to China and other countries — a trend that
could exacerbate efforts to bring down the nation's stubbornly high unemployment
rate.
One sign of increased
offshoring is the rising number of applications for federal Trade Adjustment
Assistance, which usually goes to factory workers who lost their jobs because
their work was sent overseas or was undercut by cheaper imports.
For the six months
that ended Sept. 30, workers at about 1,200 offices and plants nationwide were
approved for federal Trade Adjustment Assistance. That's about 20% more
approvals than in the same six-month period last year, according to the U.S.
Labor Department.
In addition, the most
recent Commerce Department data show that employment at the foreign
subsidiaries and affiliates of U.S. multinational firms grew by 729,000 in two
years, to 11.9 million in 2008 from 2006. Over that same period, domestic
employment by such firms slipped by 500,000 jobs, to 21.1 million.
"The paradigm
has shifted," said John Challenger, chief executive of outplacement and
consulting firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. "Most companies see the
next phase or era of growth as global.… That'll still create jobs here, just
not on the scale when they were focusing on growth in the U.S."
That trend could
further stall the recovery, which many economists believe will continue to lack
vigor while unemployment remains at current levels — 9.6% nationally and 12.4%
in California. The government is expected to report Friday that the economy
added few if any jobs in September.
Among the companies
that have recently sent jobs overseas are Hewlett-Packard Co. in Palo Alto, CKE
Restaurants Inc. in Irvine and Hilton Worldwide, the McLean, Va., hotelier that
maintained a reservations center in Hemet employing 295 people.
Hilton's filing and
comments indicated it was moving the center to the Philippines to save money.
"Across all aspects of its business, Hilton Worldwide is committed to
maximizing operating efficiencies while maintaining service levels,"
Hilton said in a brief statement.
Also moving to the
increasingly popular Philippines this year were JPMorgan Chase's telephone
banking operations, from Troy, Mich., and CKE is moving its technology
assistance desk there.
HP is laying off an
undisclosed number of human resources employees in California and nine other
states, transferring their functions to Panama.
HP, CKE and Hilton
would not provide details of the job moves, which were disclosed in recent
government filings.
The offshoring of
American production and jobs has been going on for more than two decades, with
service firms more recently pushing the trend. Experts say more offshoring
could help U.S. firms better compete in the global economy, thus boosting sales
and profits that will sustain them and generate new business.
Eventually, stronger,
expanding firms could create more opportunities for American workers, though
that's not a sure thing. More and more, for example, upscale engineering and
development for products manufactured in China are being done in China — not
the U.S. — near the centers of production.
"When companies
succeed abroad, people at home succeed," said Mihir Desai, a finance
professor at Harvard Business School.
Challenger agrees
with that logic, but he also said that some companies continue to engage in
"pure labor arbitrage," moving overseas simply for cost savings. That
kind of rationale may do little for building long-term value in the company or
its products and services.
Many others, he said,
don't see much choice but to do more overseas given the prospects of a hobbled
American economy.
But whatever happens
long term, current high levels of offshoring will add to the nation's employment
hardships for workers with college training as well as for lower-skilled
workers.
PwC, the big
accounting firm formerly known as PricewaterhouseCoopers, last spring and
summer laid off about 125 support staff members in client services, transferring
the work to Uruguay. Those positions were considered mid-level.
Dennis Donovan, a
veteran corporate-relocation consultant, said many legal and engineering firms
already have outsourced routine work overseas, and he sees a bigger wave of
offshoring by the burgeoning healthcare industry. At the same time, he sees
fewer companies moving overseas strictly on the basis of cost.
"Now it's
R&D centers and also for market penetration," said Donovan, a
principal at Wadley-Donovan-Gutshaw Consulting in New Jersey.
He said some American
firms were beginning to move call centers and other back-office operations — or
"in-sourcing" — back to the U.S. because costs in China, India and
other top outsourcing countries had risen sharply and quality hasn't been consistent.
One example is
Allstate Insurance Co., which in June opened a $12-million call center in San
Antonio, where the company expects to have 600 employees by year's end.
Customer sales and service reps earn a base salary of $27,000.
In picking Texas, the
Northbrook, Ill., firm passed up sites in India and the Philippines, said
Thomas Wilson, Allstate's chairman.
"I'm a believer
in offshoring," Wilson said in an interview, noting that his overseas
offices have helped Allstate operate around the clock and compete with rivals
that also have gone abroad for services.
But even though labor
will cost more in San Antonio than in India, Wilson hopes for a bit of a public
relations boost from the move.
In a customer survey,
he said, "81% of the people said they would think better of the company
even if it costs more."
Even so, Wilson
doesn't see his company's overall domestic employment changing much anytime
soon. And although there are some examples of in-sourcing, their numbers don't
add up to a lot compared with the jobs being lost.
President Obama has
complained that the U.S. tax system encourages companies to invest and hire
abroad, but a bill that would have ended certain tax credits and deferrals to
companies expanding or moving overseas was voted down in the Senate last week.
A FEW BASIC FACTS ABOUT OBAMA:
“Behind the thin rhetoric about reigniting a
“thriving middle class,” Obama made clear that the administration’s policies in
its second term will be subordinated entirely to the interests of big business,
beginning with plans to slash hundreds of billions more from health care
programs.”