Tuesday, February 13, 2018

TRUMP'S AMNESTY HOAX: Mexico could have written it!

Video Immigration Brief: The DACA Negotiation

Washington, D.C. (February 12, 2018) – Faced with the strong probability of the courts overturning Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) as an executive overreach, the Trump administration gave Congress the opportunity to settle the future of DACA recipients. Jan Ting, Professor of Law at The Temple University Beasley School of Law, reviews the trade-offs Congress will be discussing.
Jan Ting, Profefssor of Law at The Temple University Beasley School of law
Visit Website

Further Reading: 



Adios, Sanctuary La Raza Welfare State of California 
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs. 


BLOG: MANY DISPUTE CALIFORNIA’S EXPENDITURES FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN MEXIFORNIA JUST AS THEY DISPUTE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS. APPROXIMATELY HALF THE POPULATION OF CA IS NOW MEXICAN AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE LIKE BUNNIES. THE $22 BILLION IS STATE EXPENDITURE ONLY. COUNTIES PAY OUT MORE WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY LEADING AT OVER A BILLION DOLLARS PAID OUT YEARLY TO MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. NOW MULTIPLY THAT BY THE NUMBER OF COUNTIES IN CA AND YOU START TO GET AN IDEA OF THE STAGGERING WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE ERECTED SANS ANY LEGALS VOTES. ADD TO THIS THE FREE ENTERPRISE HOSPITAL AND CLINIC COST FOR LA RAZA’S “FREE” MEDICAL WHICH IS ESTIMATED TO BE ABOUT $1.5 BILLION PER YEAR.

Liberals claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true. It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6 billion, or at least $1,800 per household.

Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.

"If the racist "Sensenbrenner Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own governors of all the states within Aztlan." 
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.


HOMELESS IN CALIFORNIA, A WELFARE STATE OF MEXICO

95 MILLION AMERICANS (Legals) HAVE NO WORK AS THE BORDERS ARE FLOODED WITH FOREIGNERS SUCKING UP JOBS, WELFARE AND VOTING DEMOCRAT FOR MORE!


Judge intends to visit giant homeless

camp in California


AP News
|
Posted: Feb 13, 2018 3:14 PM




Judge intends to visit giant homeless camp in California
SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) — A federal judge hearing arguments over whether a California county should be able to clear out a huge homeless encampment said Tuesday he plans to take a field trip to the site alongside a riverbed.
U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter also demanded that Orange County officials provide answers about what federal funding is available to feed and temporarily house people if they are moved.
"It is time for action now. We're done with the paperwork," he told a county official while grilling her about funding.
The lawsuit is being watched by homeless advocates in West Coast cities and elsewhere amid a rise in homelessness and growth of encampments.
Tens of thousands of people are sleeping on streets from Seattle to San Diego, a problem caused in part by soaring housing costs, rock-bottom vacancy rates and a roaring economy.
"These are issues that are being litigated around the country," said Maria Foscarinis, executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty. "What the court decides may be used by these litigants and may be looked to by other courts, even if it is not binding."
In Orange County, Carter asked for volunteers from the courtroom to be ready to walk the site and identify veterans and abused women who need assistance.
The judge also has questioned whether an adversarial setting like a courtroom is the best place to find solutions to a problem that has overwhelmed some cities.
"Where is the leadership to get this done in this county potentially? Where is the long-term solution here?" he asked.
The hearing was expected to continue through the day or longer.
County officials and homeless advocates have sparred for months over the fate of hundreds of people living in tents on a bike trail that winds along the Santa Ana River to the Pacific Ocean.
A lawsuit was filed to prevent the move when the county began to shut down the 2-mile-long (3-kilometer-long) encampment.
Orange County, home to 3.2 million people between Los Angeles and San Diego, told homeless campers in late January that they must start moving. Deputies patrolled the area near the Los Angeles Angels' stadium to tell people about the move and offer help storing belongings and finding other shelter.
Homeless advocates sought protection from the courts when they heard the county was going to step up efforts to relocate tent-dwellers. Carter temporarily blocked officials from arresting those who refused to move.
Deputies still patrol the trail for criminal activity but are no longer encouraging people to leave, said Carrie Braun, a spokeswoman for the Orange County Sheriff's Department. Since relocation efforts began, about 30 percent of tents have been moved, she said.
Workers collected more than 400 pounds (181 kilograms) of human waste and more than 2,200 syringes in a two-week period, according to court filings by county attorneys.
They said a nearby shelter has never reached full capacity.
"The Constitution does not recognize, nor have plaintiffs provided any authority for, the right of a person to adversely possess public property merely by setting down their belongings," Marianne Van Riper, senior assistant county counsel, wrote in court documents.
The county faced another lawsuit filed last week alleging that closing the encampment violates the rights of disabled people living there

Chuck Schumer No Longer Interested In A Broad Immigration Reform Bill




Just yesterday I observed that Mitch McConnell seemed to be throwing Chuck Schumer all the rope he could ask for on a comprehensive immigration reform package and inviting the Democrats to go hang themselves with it. Based on comments the Senate Minority Leader made from the Senate floor, I’m beginning to suspect that he’s caught on to the scheme and is now scrambling to avoid digging himself a hole he can’t get out of.
While Schumer had previously been talking about various elements of some sort of grand bargain, offering indications as to which pieces he might support or oppose, his tone has suddenly changed. Claiming that this is “neither the time nor the place” for something more comprehensive and permanent, it now sounds as if the Democrats are back to talking about only a “clean fix” for DACA to cover the Dreamers. (Time)
TRENDING:
McClatchy: Dems hitting red alert over Trump polling
“The only enemy here is overreach,” Schumer said. “Now is not the time nor the place to reform the entire legal immigration system. Rather, this is the time for a narrow bill” — which Democrats have said would help the Dreamers and provide some money for border security.
The comments came as the Senate voted 97-1 — Ted Cruz, R-Texas, provided the sole “no” vote — to plunge into an open-ended immigration debate that’s been promised by McConnell. Both parties’ leaders hope debate can be concluded this week, but it’s unclear if that will happen or what the product, if any, will be.
“This is going to be done or not done this week,” No. 2 Senate GOP leader John Cornyn of Texas told reporters.
So that’s what Schumer said on the Senate floor. But listen to the tone he took last night at the University of Louisville during an appearance with Mitch McConnell. He’s saying they’re ready to work toward getting something done, but he doesn’t say how much.
 McConnell (and presumably Trump) are talking about the big picture bill which Democrats have claimed they want to hammer out for a long time. But now Schumer is back to just a fix for the Dreamers (including a path to citizenship) in exchange for, “some money for border security.”
Pardon me for saying that this is absolutely not something that Republicans should hold their noses and sign off on. If Schumer and the Democrats want amnesty for nearly two million people, then the entire, comprehensive immigration reform package needs to be on the table. He’s looking to cherry pick the one item Democrats “claim” to want the most and give up a few crumbs in exchange, with hints that he might be willing to talk about the other issues later. And I put “claim” in scare quotes there for a reason. In reality, the one thing that the DNC would probably like more than amnesty for the Dreamers is nine months of claiming that the GOP is deporting all the Dreamers straight up through the elections.
This is one policy area where the legislature is perfectly suited to act and we have a defined set of issues they could tackle. These include possible changes to legal immigration quotas, whether to keep or abandon the lottery and put limits on chain immigration, funding for the wall and staffing levels for immigration enforcement. They also need to tackle questions surrounding the passage of Kate’s Law and mandatory E-verify use. All of this can and should be addressed.
If the GOP leadership is actually gullible enough to hand the Democrats a “clean” amnesty for Dreamers and get nothing in exchange but a few bucks to repair fencing on the Mexican border, they need to simply resign now. What Schumer and the Democrats are asking for his huge and it will likely be impossible to get a lot of the more conservative members to vote for it anyway. They need to give up something equally meaningful in exchange because we’re not going to trust them to deal fairly on the subject later after they’ve already gotten what they really want.

NumbersUSA’s Rosemary Jenks: E-Verify Ignored in DACA Negotiations 

 

Because ‘Members of Congress Know It Will Work’


File Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
by ROBERT KRAYCHIK23 Jan 2018395

Members of Congress broadly oppose a legislative nationwide E-Verify mandate for employers because “they know it will work,” said NumbersUSA’s Rosemary Jenks, explaining why E-Verify is not being pushed in congressional negotiations for an amnesty deal for recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Jenks further noted that both parties are beholden to special interests supportive of “mass migration.”

Jenks offered her analysis during a Monday interview on SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with Breitbart News’s Senior Editors-at-Large Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak.
Mansour asked Jenks why most Republicans were not supporting a legislative nationwide mandate for E-Verify use by employers. “Why do you think that this isn’t being pushed, then? It seems like a no-brainer. Why is this not being included in all the negotiations?” she said.
“I think [E-Verify] is not being pushed precisely because members of Congress know it will work,” said Jenks. “I think that is exactly the reason it’s not being pushed. Democrats, for sure, don’t want mandatory E-Verify because they know it will discourage illegal immigration, which will discourage the push for the next amnesty. And, let’s face it, the establishment Republicans don’t want it because they know it will be effective and eliminate their cheap labor pools.”
Special interests, including “big business,” “organized religion,” and “ethnic advocacy groups,” subvert popular American will via their funding and political agitation, said Jenks, adding, “It’s about the donors and about the Democrat Party wanting mass immigration. Those are the two factors that rule every immigration debate. It’s always the big business donors, organized religion, the ethnic advocacy groups. All of the money is behind mass immigration, and then, there’s the American people on the other side. That’s the problem we have had. That’s why we haven’t controlled immigration in the last five decades.”
Legislating a national mandate for E-Verify use by employers is more important than construction of a southern border wall, argued Jenks. “In our view, mandatory E-Verify is more important than a wall. So that is the one place where we’re hoping that we can move the administration to saying E-Verify is a must-have.”
Approximately half of “the illegal population” is composed of foreigners who lawfully entered the homeland and overstay their visas, said Jenks. An E-Verify mandate on employers, she added, would “mostly shut down” the lure of employment for illegal aliens.
E-Verify usage by employers would facilitate more effective enforcement of immigration law by allowing federal authorities to target businesses abstaining for its use, said Jenks. “They have a clearer target for enforcement measures.”
Jenks listed the following elements as “must-haves” for any legislative amnesty proposal: 1) limiting the amnesty to the DACA population; 2) ending chain migration; 3) ending the “Diversity Visa Program” lottery; 4) implementation of effective border security and interior enforcement measures; and 5) implementation of a national mandate for employer use of E-Verify.

Breitbart News Tonight airs Monday through Friday on SiriusXM’s Patriot channel 125 from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern (6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Pacific).

PARTNER WITH MEXICO, the LA RAZA DEMOCRAT PARTY and the PRO-BUSINESS GOP to keep wages for LEGALS depressed (today they are depressed to 1973 levels).

But you will still get the tax bills for the Mex welfare state and crime tidal wave!


“Illegal aliens are not supposed to work, and knowingly providing shelter for illegal aliens can be construed as harboring and shielding, elements of a felony under federal law, Title 8 U.S. Code § 1324.”  

“Where aliens and jobs are concerned, even many categories of nonimmigrant aliens (temporary visitors) including aliens who lawfully enter under the Visa Waiver Program or with tourist visas may not work in the United States and immediately become subject to removal (deportation) if they seek gainful employment.”  ----MICHAEL CUTLER – FRONTPAGE mag

THE LA RAZA INVASION:

The Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via mass-immigration floods the market with foreign laborspikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.   NEIL MUNRO



DEATH BY CORRUPTION:


What caused the destruction of the Democrat Party in America?

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/07/peter-beinart-how-democrats-lost-their.html 

AMERICAN TRAITOR: JOHN McCAIN AND THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/02/an-american-traitor-senator-john-mccain.html

 Adios, Sanctuary La Raza Welfare State of California 

A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. 
The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs. 

BLOG: MANY DISPUTE CALIFORNIA’S EXPENDITURES FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN MEXIFORNIA JUST AS THEY DISPUTE THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS. APPROXIMATELY HALF THE POPULATION OF CA IS NOW MEXICAN AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE LIKE BUNNIES. THE $22 BILLION IS STATE EXPENDITURE ONLY. COUNTIES PAY OUT MORE WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY LEADING AT OVER A BILLION DOLLARS PAID OUT YEARLY TO MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. NOW MULTIPLY THAT BY THE NUMBER OF COUNTIES IN CA AND YOU START TO GET AN IDEA OF THE STAGGERING WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE ERECTED SANS ANY LEGALS VOTES. ADD TO THIS THE FREE ENTERPRISE HOSPITAL AND CLINIC COST FOR LA RAZA’S “FREE” MEDICAL WHICH IS ESTIMATED TO BE ABOUT $1.5 BILLION PER YEAR.

Liberals claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true. It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6 billion, or at least $1,800 per household.

Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.
Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. 
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.
"If the racist "Sensenbrenner Legislation" passes the US Senate, there is no doubt that a massive civil disobedience movement will emerge. Eventually labor union power can merge with the immigrant civil rights and "Immigrant Sanctuary" movements to enable us to either form a new political party or to do heavy duty reforming of the existing Democratic Party. The next and final steps would follow and that is to elect our own governors of all the states within Aztlan." 
Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. 
And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.

One dead as fires strike homeless encampments in Oakland, California

By Guillaume Garnier and David Brown
14 February 2018
On Saturday around 11 a.m. in Oakland, California a fire broke out in a semi-official homeless encampment in the city’s Fruitvale district, destroying the tents and belongings of roughly 20 people. Just by luck there were no injuries in that incident. However, another fire broke out in a West Oakland camp on Monday, killing one man.
The specific causes of both fires remain unknown. Police at the scene of the Fruitvale fire decided it was not intentionally set and are likely to leave it at that. Under the conditions homeless people face, more fires and more fatalities are inevitable.
Aaron Edmond, who lives at the Fruitvale encampment, told the WSWS, “It’s just a matter of time for fire to break out.” To keep warm at night tents are frequently packed with bedding and any attempt to cook or even a stray cigarette butt can lead to disaster. “We try to teach fire safety and hand out extinguishers, but it’s not enough,” Edmond explained.
The camp became semi-official in November 2017, when the city authorized the organizers of an earlier community-led encampment, “The Village,” to use the land and set up portable toilets. In October, the city council declared Oakland to be in a “shelter crisis” and decided they would allow homeless camps on certain parcels of city owned land.
Only four sites were ever officially registered and their chosen locations drew the ire of Oakland locals. Two were assigned to working class West Oakland while several wealthier voting districts were spared the development of a homeless settlement.
Since then, homeless people across the city have been pushed away from businesses by police and to the increasingly cramped city council approved locations near freeways and railroad tracks.
In Alameda County, whose county seat is Oakland, the homeless population spiked 39 percent between 2015 and 2017, to 5,629 people, according to the most recent Point in Time Survey. The survey also reported that 57 percent of Alameda County’s homeless residents lost their homes due to housing prices.
Kaleo, a young man at the Fruitvale camp, described his experience: “A few years ago I was living in an apartment and worked at a fast food restaurant for $8 an hour. I got involved campaigning to raise the minimum wage and I started facing retaliation at work. Then my landlord started raising the rent. I tried to fight it, but I just couldn’t afford housing anymore.”
According to RENT CafĂ©, the average market rate for a studio apartment in Oakland in 2017 was $1,700 per month. Oakland ranks among the most expensive cities in the United States by rent price, as the extreme and pervasive gentrification of San Francisco has driven even well-compensated professionals across the Bay to Oakland—where they in turn price out working class residents. An analogous dynamic has played out in New York between Manhattan and the outer boroughs of Brooklyn and Queens.
A growing number of homeless under these conditions are currently working but still cannot make ends meet. “We have all varieties here,” Edmond said. “Some families with children; there’s a contractor here with his tools who could redo your kitchen. Just across the road there’s honestly a doctor living homeless. We’re just normal people in a bad situation.”
The mayor of Oakland, Democrat Libby Schaaf, shared her own idea for resolving the homelessness crisis in her 2017 State of the City Speech: “Give up the Airbnb. Fix up that back unit.”
In response to a historic expansion of the homeless population, the immediate solution emanating from the city of Oakland’s highest official is to implore residents to welcome the homeless into the shed in their backyard. Workers are told that the homeless would be fortunate if they could live with trash pickup and all the homely accommodations of a tiny shed, and that periodic deaths from insecure and substandard housing are just part of life.
In December 2016, 36 people died in the Ghost Ship fire, where an old warehouse had been turned into informal housing. In March 2017, four people died when a halfway house in West Oakland burned down despite the city flagging it as unsafe in 2015. The recent fire death in a homeless camp is just part of the overall trend.
Oakland’s housing crisis is part of the broader growth of social inequality and financial parasitism. On one hand, since the 2008 economic crash, wages have stagnated and full-time work has been replaced by part-time. On the other, the stock market has been reaching record highs while speculation has driven housing prices ever higher.
“We’re living in a rich county,” said Jabari Shaw who volunteers helping Oakland’s homeless, “but you look here and it’s like the slums in Brazil.” He pointed to the role politicians had played in driving the crisis. “I remember when Jerry Brown was mayor and started making laws that put liens on houses for old cars out front or broken roofs,” Shaw noted, “you started seeing more people lose their homes.”
The policies pursued by the Democrats and Republicans have driven the immense growth in inequality. A report last November by the Institute for Policy Studies showed that the three richest Americans—Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett—have more wealth than the poorest half of the country’s population. The wealth of those three amounted to $264 billion and has only grown since then.
In contrast, the poorest 60 percent of Americans do not have enough money to cover a $500 emergency. This inequality grew under the Obama administration’s bank bailouts and quantitative easing and is accelerating under the bipartisan cuts to corporate taxes in Trump’s tax bill.
“I learned last election that you can’t get the help you want from Democrats or Republicans,” Kaleo said, “the system is so broken, we need a new party.”



NATHAN CHERRY - GOOGLE KISSES MUSLIM ASS BIG TIME - ASSAULTS AMERICA'S FIRST AMENDMENT IN THE PROCESS OF GROVELING TO MOHAMMED THE FORNICATING DOG

can you even name one corporation that has not and will not sell out the american people for a quarter cent more of profit???


PRAY FOR THE PERSECUTED CHRISTIAN!

"We are witnessing an astonishing escalation in Christian persecution, like we have rarely seen since the first century," writes Johnnie Moore in his new book called The Martyr’s Oath: Living for the Jesus They’re Willing to Die. 

Google Yanks Gay Apps From Store – In Muslim Nation!

|
Posted: Feb 13, 2018 11:23 AM
  Share   Tweet
Maybe Google isn't as LGBT friendly as everyone thought. 

It has been reported recently that Google has complied with a government request in Indonesia to pull LGBT apps from their Play Store. It appears that, though “homosexuality and gay sex are legal in Indonesia,” the government and cultural norms frown on LGBT behavior. The government has requested, and Google has complied with, removing some LGBT apps from their Play Store in order to discourage homosexual behavior.

At the time of this writing it appears that the Indonesian government has requested up to 73 LGBT apps be removed from availability to the Indonesian people in Google's Play Store. It is unclear how many have been removed, but it appears that at least some of the apps have already been yanked.

I'll admit that I'm perplexed by news that Google is complying with a government request to yank LGBT apps from their Play Store. I thought Google was a “tolerant,” “inclusive” company that championed the views of the sexual revolution. I thought Google openly mocked and blacklisted anyone that dared to disagree with their corporate code.

Wasn't it Google that called for the firing of James Damore, the former engineer that dared to express views not shared by Google? Wasn't it Google that openly mocked conservative values, and felt free to blacklist conservatives from their company campus? Wasn't it Google that supported every conceivable lifestyle, including people identifying as fictional beasts and buildings? I was certain that it was Google that made clear in the Damore case that “intolerance” against individuals (except conservatives) would not be tolerated or supported.

I wonder how the employees feel about pulling LGBT apps from the Play Store. Do they sit around in meetings sharing an understanding nod and look of approval because, after all, this is Indonesia? Do they give the Indonesian government a pass because they are the government and have the right to govern as they see fit?

It has been reported that the Indonesian government recently forced several transgender women to cut their hair and wear men's clothing to show their disapproval of transgenderism. Does anyone at Google consider that removing the LGBT apps will be a sign of support for the governments actions?

Or maybe, just maybe, Google is a corporation with profit as its first priority and the bottom line as its main concern.
First of all, let me say that I fully support Google acting in the best interest of the company. If the directors of this corporation believe it best to pull apps from the Play Store in order to stay competitive in other spaces in Indonesia, so be it. That's business and they should be free to do so.
What I am having a hard time with is Google bending their knee to Indonesia while virtue signaling in the U.S.
Anyone that read even just the highlights of James Damore's complaint against Google would conclude the company has no patience whatsoever for any behavior it deems lacking in tolerance or inclusiveness. You can identify as a fictional beast or a building and Google will let you give a talk about your “alternative lifestyle” But if you dare suggest differences between genders exist, you will quickly be ridiculed, tormented, and eventually fired. After all, this is Google, a place where (almost) every opinion and viewpoint is supported (as long as it toes the company line).
But here we see clear evidence that first and foremost Google is concerned about profits. What other reason could there be for Google to behave in such an intolerant, anti-LGBT manner? By yanking apps from the Play Store, Google is lending their world-wide brand to the Indonesian government's treatment of LGBT people. There can be no doubt Google would never support such treatment, much less condone and participate in it here in the U.S. But that's because Google knows they don't have to.
This decision is not brought about by corporate policy, culture, or conviction. This decision has been made purely on the basis of profit. The decision and underlying reason should be supported, as any business has the right to do what is best for business. But if Google is going to operate under this premise – profit – it needs to stop acting holier-than-thou and firing people for their personal views.
What Google is doing, essentially, is supporting a government position on the issue of LGBT rights that Google would call intolerant. If the U.S. government took a similar position as the Indonesian government, Google would quickly oppose the position and refuse to comply with any request to support the position. But, Google is supporting and aiding the Indonesian government in their position. This is nothing short of hypocrisy; and all in the name of money.
Corporations are, first and foremost, for-profit organizations. They seek to make money. Their shareholders want the corporation to be profitable so some of the profits flow through to them. With this in mind what Google is doing makes perfect sense. Ideologically, though, Google is acting inconsistently and hypocritically with regard to its position on LGBT rights. In this behavior Google proves it cares less about its ideology than it does about profit.
Google would do well to remember that “a house divided cannot stand.”
Once a Muslim, ALWAYS a murderer!


Praise be to Allah the great fornicating dog!

"The Times also reported the story of one 13-year-old victim who was

collected from a children’s home, drugged with cocaine and mephedrone,

and raped by up to seven men at so-called “sessions”, or sex parties, held by

the groomers."



UNDERSTANDING THE MUSLIM 

BARBARIANS…. They live to hate, kill and 

rape.




Koran 2:191 "slay the unbelievers wherever you find them"
Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends"
Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam"
Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran"
Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels"
Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them"
Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them"
Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood"
Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies"
Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".