THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
“American values are what make us a partner that other
nations want to work with. To put all that at risk if we walk away from
Ukraine, if we turn our backs on Israel. It’s just not worth it. That’s
why tomorrow I’m going to send to Congress an urgent budget request to
fund America’s national security needs, to support our critical
partners, including Israel and Ukraine. It’s a smart investment that’s
going to pay dividends for American security for generations.”
A source familiar with the supplemental request said it includes $60
billion for Ukraine and replenishing U.S. stockpiles, $14 billion for
Israel, $10 billion for humanitarian efforts, $14 billion for the U.S.
border with Mexico and $7 billion for the Indo-Pacific region. The White
House has not yet released details.
Previous accounts had it at $10 billion for Israel. But the lion’s share is obviously going to the Ukraine war.
The mention of $10 billion for “humanitarian efforts” should also be
raising red flags. What does that mean beyond the already $100 million
promised for Gaza?
Biden had already foreshadowed that he would be using Israel to push for the Ukraine aid in his initial speech a week ago.
“My administration has consulted closely with Congress
throughout this crisis. And when Congress returns, we’re going to ask
them to take urgent action to fund the national security requirements of
our critical partners.”
Partners. Plural.
The Pacific region indicates that some of the money will go to funding Taiwan’s defenses as well.
The border money won’t be used for security, but to more speedily
process the illegal aliens invading the country for dispersion.
So it’s a mixed bag at best and Republicans are uncomfortable with the package deal.
Senator J.D. Vance co-wrote an op-ed accusing the administration of holding up Israel aid to get its Ukraine aid.
Having failed to force through more Ukraine funding by
tying it to disaster relief for Americans, Senate leadership is now
using the crisis in Israel as a “Plan B” to get the Biden
administration’s funding request across the finish line — this time by
as much as $100 billion.
But the conflicts in Ukraine and Israel are two distinct events that deserve two distinct responses…
Instead of holding up aid to Israel for additional Ukraine funding,
Congress should give the situation in Israel the separate debate and
vote that it deserves. Conservatives should also insist on securing our
own borders and fully enforcing our immigration laws, considering that
Hamas and other terrorist organizations have infiltrated our homeland
through our open borders and continue to do so today.
J.D. Vance makes various arguments for why Ukraine and Israel are
different. One that he doesn’t mention is that foreign aid to Israel has
been used primarily to tether it to the U.S. defense industry as a
means of control.
And that’s what we’re seeing now.
The annual foreign aid bill for Israel is basically a kind of
spending credit in which Israel gets to buy U.S. weapons and systems,
but in exchange for being dependent on us for resupply. That means the
White House calls the shots on whether Israel goes to war and for how
long. (This is a major function of our foreign arms sales and defense
alliances.)
It’s like Hotel California. It looks like a good deal, but then when you need to rely on it, you realize it’s a leash.
The Biden administration wants a fight over the aid package because
then it can accuse Republicans of betraying Israel and helping Hamas.
Republicans will reply that Biden is the one sabotaging weapons supplies
to Israel by tying it to $60 billion for Ukraine and things that may be
more dubious like “humanitarian aid” potentially to terrorists.
Biden could have avoided it, but instead he’s going to use the Hamas
attack for political leverage in a partisan fight. He’s going to delay
Israel aid in order to undermine Republicans.
Daniel
Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom
Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the
radical Left and Islamic terrorism.
President
Joe Biden’s deputies and the ACLU have drafted a lawsuit settlement
that would open American society to an unlimited number of economic
migrants who bring children from distant South America, Africa, and
Asia.
“If approved by a judge, this provision in theproposed
settlement would remain in effect for eight years, preventing an
administration during that time from restoring a ‘zero-tolerance’
prosecution policy” that would penalize illegal migrants who carry
children up to the border, according to a Washington Postreport.
If a future president wants to end the deal, he would have to take the case on the years-long route to the Supreme Court.
However,
a president can use other powers to reject migrants at the border, as
President Donald Trump did during the coronavirus disaster. For example,
Section 212(f) of the law allows a president to exclude any and all
migrants deemed “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” No
president has fully used that power partly because business interests
want to import workers, consumers, and renters.
The
new eight-year deal is part of a “sue and settle” lawsuit and crony
giveaway between Biden’s pro-migration political allies and Biden’s
pro-migration officials, including the Cuban-born border chief,
Alejandro Mayorkas.
Homeland
Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas speaks at the Democracy Summit on
Thursday, March 30, 2023, at the Convention Center in Washington.
(Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
If
approved, the giveaway deal would also reward the roughly 5,000 foreign
families who violated the border law during Trump’s years. The Washington Post reported:
M]igrant families would be eligible for three-year work permits and several government-paid services,including
six months of housing assistance, one year of medical care and three
years of counseling. Their deportation orders would be wiped clean, and
they would have a new chance to apply for humanitarian protection via an
asylum officer instead of in the more adversarial U.S. immigration
courts. The government will provide legal aid through nonprofits.
Migrant
families who were deported or returned home voluntarily would be
allowed to travel back into the United States and would be allowed to
ask if they can bring other household members with them, according to
the proposed settlement.
The illegal migrants would also get legal aid as they apply for the biggest prize — citizenship in the United States.
The
judge has the power to reject the deal, which overrides Congress’
border laws. But he faces intense peer pressure to approve the giveaway.
Also, the federal judiciary has repeatedly crumpled whenever Biden’s
deputies insist they have the right to import endless migrants for the
jobs and houses needed by American families.
The
sue-and-settle giveaway also serves as a display of the establishment’s
self-created power to reject the public’s legitimate and rational
demand for secure borders.
The deal matches the 1997 Flores lawsuit
deal which allowed a California judge to bar the detention of migrant
children for more than two weeks. In practice, this means that the
children and their parents would be released once they arrive at the
border, despite the federal law requiring them to be detained until the
parent’s asylum plea was decided in court.
The 1997 deal was later expanded by federal Judge Dolly Gee — the daughter of Chinese immigrants — and by officials working for President Barack Obama.
The resulting Flores loophole
in border law ensured a massive inflow of economic migrants who
rationally brought children to ensure they got released instead of being
detained.
Judge Gee’s Flores deal killed many migrant children and parents, but Trump only began to undo the deal during his third year in office.
In 2017, the Flores deal
allowed a huge inflow of adults with children. The inflow prompted
Trump to promise prosecution of all migrants, including parents with
children. But Democrats and their media allies used the issue as an
emotional cudgel to clobber Trump. He quickly reversed the policy after
roughly 5,000 families had been detained, divided, and often, formally
prosecuted, and legally deported.
Democrats
are now using the 5,000 migrants to symbolically condemn Trump’s fully
legal effort to protect Americans from border migration, even as Biden’s
investor-driven migration is pushing millions of Americans out of the economy, away from politicians’ attention, and into early graves.
Extraction Migration
The federal government has long operated an unpopular economic policy of Extraction Migration. This colonialism-like policy extracts vast amounts of human resources from needy countries, reduces beneficial trade, and uses the imported workers, renters, and consumers to grow Wall Street and the economy.
The migrant inflow has successfully forced down Americans’ wages and also boosted rents and housing prices. The inflow has also pushed many native-born Americans out of careers in a wide variety of business sectors and contributed to the rising death rate of poor Americans.
“Real
wages for the working class have collapsed thanks to the policies of
the Biden administration,” Rep. Bob Good (R-VA), a House committee
chairman, said at a September 13 hearing. He continued:
Under
President Trump, blue-collar real wages rose 5.6 percent. Under Biden,
blue-collar real wages have fallen 2.1 percent. The decline of
blue-collar wages is significantly affected by seven million illegal
aliens pouring across the border under this administration. Liberal
Democrats used to recognize the depressing effect of illegal immigration
on American wages.
The lethal policy also sucks jobs and wealth from heartland states by subsidizing coastal investors with a flood of low-wage workers, high-occupancy renters, and government-aided consumers.
“He helped create the establishment,” Marlow continued. “There is no
human being on earth who’s had more opportunity to close the border or
at least secure the border than Joe Biden. Over 30 years in the Senate,
eight years as vice president, and now three years as president.”
‘Breaking Biden’ Author: Why Joe Biden Wants an Open Border Despite Terror Threat
Breitbart Editor-in-Chief and New York Times bestselling Breaking Biden
author Alex Marlow explained why President Joe Biden allows the United
States to have an open border despite all of the concerns about
potential terrorists entering the country from our porous southern
border.
“Much of Washington likes an open border, and Joe
Biden is the ultimate Washington establishment creature,” Marlow told
YouTuber Stephen Gardner in a Tuesday interview about Marlow’s new book, Breaking Biden.
“He helped create the establishment,” Marlow continued. “There is no
human being on earth who’s had more opportunity to close the border or
at least secure the border than Joe Biden. Over 30 years in the Senate,
eight years as vice president, and now three years as president.”
“He’s had the ability, more than any other person, to
take this issue seriously, and he hasn’t. So, clearly it’s
intentional,” he added.
Marlow then elaborated on why Biden wants the U.S. border to remain open:
First of all: big business, which is now essentially an
arm of the Democrat Party — formerly it was an arm of the Republican
establishment, but now it’s really more Democrat, and then also some
Republican establishment — they like big influx of illegal immigration.
What that does is, it creates a big consumer base, and it drives down
wages for working class people. And now we’re even moving into middle
class people with Visa overstays, so sort of white collar as well. But
the more immigration we have, the less they have to pay their workers.
That makes their stock go up. So, their expenses go down.
“Big business loves an open border. Big business loves Joe Biden. I document that in great detail,” Marlow said.
“Next: the Democrat Party,” Marlow continued. “As people get older,
they become conservative, and they vote Republican. So the Democrat
Party needs a new voter base.”,
“Because Republican Millennials have some children, Democrat
Millennials don’t want to have kids as much. They’re not interested in
replacing their voters with new people that they can raise up, so the
they they’re having fewer children,” he added.
The Breitbart editor-in-chief continued:
They have to figure out a way to get their voters, so
they import them. Even though the illegal aliens aren’t supposed to vote
— they now vote in local elections — their kids will vote, and they
will vote typically for Democrats, for a number of reasons. First of
all, it’s the handouts, the big government nanny state. But also,
the Democrats are much more sophisticated in getting their ideas into
the Spanish language. I’m very critical of Republicans in the book as
well about this, that the Democrats — the Democrat establishment, the
George Soroses — are buying up radio stations and broadcasting in
Spanish.
“We’re missing all these new people who are voters, or at least
raising future voters, and we’re ceding all that territory to
Democrats,” Marlow said. “The [Democrats] need the border open — and it
doesn’t matter what humanitarian strife happens, it doesn’t matter if
wages get driven down.”
Marlow added that the establishment media is also “in on it, because
they understand this,” noting that he touched upon this issue in his
first book, Breaking The News.
The Breitbart News editor concluded that despite the increased
activation of radical Islamic terrorists, expect the border to remain
open for the aforementioned reasons. He told Breitbart News in a
statement that “this is one of the reasons why I wrote Breaking Biden. We are not going to have a secure border so long as Biden is in power. He doesn’t care about national security and he never has.”
Texas Governor Greg Abbott ordered the
construction of additional barriers along the state’s border with New
Mexico and Mexico. Border walls built in El Paso force migrants to enter
the U.S. into New Mexico and then move across the Rio Grande into
Texas, the governor says.
Governor Abbott posted on X stating the State of
Texas is installing additional fencing “along New Mexico border.” The
governor added that the existing barriers built on the Texas/Mexico
border in El Paso move the migrants to cross into New Mexico.
The migrants then move from New Mexico into El Paso,
Abbott stated. “To end that, we are building a barrier on the New Mexico
border,” he stated.
The barriers will be built along the Rio Grande where it makes a
sharp turn to the north and separates El Paso from Dona Anna County in
New Mexico (highlighted in red circle below).
Texas-New Mexico-Mexico border region where Abbott announced plans for new border fencing. (Getty Images)
The action ordered by the Texas governor falls under the State’s Operation Lone Star.
Earlier this month, Governor Abbott announced on X that the state is
authorizing more funding for border walls in the ongoing third special
session of the Texas Legislature.
Bob Price is
the Breitbart Texas-Border team’s associate editor and senior news
contributor. He is an original member of the Breitbart Texas team. Price
is a regular panelist on Fox 26 Houston’s What’s Your Point?Sunday-morning talk show. Follow him on Twitter @BobPriceBBTX.
DHS Mayorkas Builds Migration Escalator for Ecuador
President Joe Biden’s border chief will spend
taxpayer funds to help migrants from Ecuador evade Congress’ caps on
chain migration into American communities, jobs, and housing.
Biden’s Cuban-born, pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas, justified
his Ecuador escalator into America as a way to protect Ecuadoreans from
the risks they would adopt by hiring coyotes to illegally sneak into
the United States.
“Establishing this process for certain Ecuadorian nationals will
ensure more families can access lawful pathways rather than placing
themselves at the mercy of smugglers to make the dangerous journey,” he
said in an agency statement which ignores the agency’s mission of guarding the border.
Mayorkas says his policies are driven by “equity.”
But he said nothing about protecting the many Americans who are at the
mercy of employers who prefer hiring Mayorkas’ poor, hard-working, and
compliant migrants.
RELATED: Mayor Eric Adams Heads to Mexico — NYC Migrant Crisis at “Breaking Point”
Many millions of Americans — especially older, sicker, and alienated Americans —
have already lost decent wages, housing, good schools, and their
stable, low-conflict society because Mayorkas and prior border chiefs
have refused to enforce the nation’s border laws.
The GOP could stop the Mayorkas escalator if GOP leaders block
funding in the pending 2024 appropriations bill. But many GOP leaders privately welcome
the lucrative inflow of workers, renters, and consumers while they
loudly criticize Mayorkas’ damaging border, crime, and drug policies.
Ecuador
Ecuador is a country at the northern end of South America. In 2000,
roughly 270,000 Ecuadorean migrants lived in the United States.
That number has surged since Mayorkas opened the border and built secure pathways through the Darien Gap jungle between South and Central America. In 2023 alone, roughly 50,000 Ecuadoreans have traveled through the jungle into Central America towards the United States.
“I’ve been here almost 34 years and I’ve never seen the wave of
Ecuadorians coming in the short time,” said Walter Sinche, the executive
director of the Alianza Ecuatoriana Internacional, or the Ecuadorian
International Alliance. “I knew a family, for example, they came with
five kids. Not only undocumented but also people that come with [a
legal] visa, they overstay, so that’s also a large number,” he told Breitbart News in March.
By 2023, Mayorkas has welcomed roughly 165,000 Ecuadoreans, pushing their U.S. population close to one million, or roughly one in every 18 Ecuadoreans.
Mayorkas’s escalator policy is intended to help at-home Ecuadoreans evade Congress’ caps on chain migration law.
A
group of Ecuadorian migrants waits for Border Patrol agents to arrive
and provide transportation. (Photo: Randy Clark/Breitbart Texas)
The law offers 226,000 green cards each year to the close relatives
of immigrants. But many more foreigners want to live in Americans’
society, so there is a waiting list of roughly four million foreigners
for a quarter-million green cards each year.
Mayorkas’ plan is to let Ecuadoreans who are on the
waiting list to jump the line. He said he would give them a quasi-legal
“Family Reunification Parole” status so they can live and work in the
United States until they get one of the 226,000 family green cards.
The Ecuadorean escalator, however, might also be a swap to Ecuador’s
government. Mayorkas wants to work with countries in South America to
regulate — but not stop — the flow of African and Asian migrants who
fly into South America in the hope of trekking to the United States.
Despite his claim that the plan will reduce illegal migration,
Mayorkas’s plan will expand the incentives for men to illegally migrate
to the United States. It expands the incentive by dangling the delayed
reward of American citizenship for the relatives of illegals who sneak
into the United States and later get green cards.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed against Mayorkas for his use of
parole to import more migrants. However, the Supreme Court has dodged
the issue, so allowing Mayorkas to create new parole programs whenever a
prior program is blocked.
Mayorkas’ Migration
The Ecuadorean escalator is just one of many ways Mayorkas and his
allies have stripped the protections of border law enforcement from 300
million Americans.
For example, Mayorkas claims he has the power to “parole” any number
of migrants into the United States, despite Congress’ cap of roughly 1
million legal immigrants per year.
How is now using that claimed parole power to fly into an additional 360,000 migrants per year from Nicaragua, Venezuela, Haiti, and Cuba?
He is also allowing roughly 600,000 illegal migrants per year to get parole clearance via his CBP-One cellphone app.
He is providing work permits to those emigrants, and also to the
hundreds of thousands of other migrants who cross the border and say
they need asylum.
RELATED: Mayorkas Refuses to Use Term “Illegal Immigrants”
C-SPAN
He is also providing “Temporary Protected Status” to hundreds of
thousands of Haitians, Venezuelans, Cameroonians, and others who sneaked
across the border.
He is also allowing 200,000 people from Central American countries to jump the chain-migration line.
The flood of migrants has delivered at least 5 million illegal
migrants since 2021, alongside roughly 3 million legal immigrants. That
population shock is adding roughly one migrant for every U.S. birth,
driving up housing prices, shrinking wages, crowding schools, and
suppressing corporate investment in American employees.
His allies in Joe Biden’s administration are also funding the
migrants to get training, jobs, and housing that would otherwise go to
Americans. For example, the Department of Justice is also pressuring
banks to loan money
to many of Mayorkas’ migrants, even though the loans can be used to pay
down the high-interest smuggling debts to coyotes. The loans could also
hire coyotes to deliver migrants’ wives and children to their U.S.
locations.
Mayorkas — and his business allies — are also using the flood of
migrants to shift marketplace power from employees to employers.
“Regrettably, our legal immigration system is not designed to meet the needs of employers here in the United States,” Mayorkas told the Senate’s judiciary committee in May. He continued:
We have employers who are striving to hire, to find
people who could fill jobs to contribute to our country’s economic
prosperity. Regrettably, regrettably, our legal immigration system is
not designed to meet that need of employers here in the United States,
despite the fact that individuals from other countries want to come here
to work — even seasonally, even temporarily — earn the money that they
can bring back to their home countries and support their families there.
The lethal policy also sucks jobs and wealth from heartland states by subsidizing coastal investors with a flood of low-wage workers, high-occupancy renters, and government-aided consumers.
The population inflow alsoreduces the politicalcloutof native-born Americans, because the population replacement allows elites and the establishment to divorce themselves fromthe needsandinterestsof ordinary Americans.
Reflections on when a gigantic biographical inconvenience was successfully hidden and denied.
THE KORAN
BIBLE OF THE MUSLIM TERRORIST:
“The Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI
Koran 2:191 "s lay the unbelievers wherever you find them" Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends" Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam" Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran" Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels" Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them" Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them" Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood" Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies" Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".
From Munich to Gaza to America
Terrorist’s grandson, now in the U.S. Navy, touts “original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
“I grew up in the
crosshairs of the Israeli-Palestinian war in Gaza” and “the threat of
terrorism has cast a long shadow on my life.” Even so, to impose “even
more intensive vetting on the entire Muslim world would be dangerous
and unconstitutional.” American Muslims “are proven to be peaceful
contributors to our American economy and way of life,” and “moderate
Muslims, like my friend and former colleague Rumana Ahmed, can help protect American lives and restore the original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
Who is this who touts the “original glow”
of Islam, lived in the shadow of terrorism, and grew up the crosshairs
of the “Israeli-Palestinian war” in Gaza? It’s Ammar Campa-Najjar,
writing in a February 25, 2017 commentary in The Hill, which bills him as “a Mexican-Palestinian American and former Obama campaign and administration official.” But there’s more to the man.
Ammar is the grandson of Muhammad
Abu Yousef al-Najjar, mastermind of the Palestinian terrorists who
abducted, tortured and murdered 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich
Olympics in 1972. Maybe that’s the “shadow” of terrorism he was talking
about. Ammar is also the son of Palestinian Authority official Yasser Najjar. Ammar claims his father “migrated from the Middle East to America on a student visa,” met a Mexican-American lady named Abigail and raised a family in San Diego county, but there’s a problem here.
Back in 2003 Linda Gradstein of National Public Radio interviewedYasser al-Najjar at his office in Gaza,
where he served with the Palestinian Authority. Yasser was married,
with four children but his wife and children were not named. After the
Israelis killed Muhammad Abu Yousef al-Najjar, Yasser was a fugitive.
Son Ammar has not documented Yasser’s move to the United States, or
claims that he earned an MBA from San Diego State and started several
clothing boutiques.
“I attended an
Islamic school in San Diego as a child,” Ammar told The Hill. “The
school was part of a mosque called Masjid Abu Bakr, where hundreds of
people prayed and maintained strong relations with local elected and law
enforcement officials.I knew of three men at
that mosque, Khalid al-Mihdhar, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, who
were issued visas. . . Those three men were among the 19 terrorist
hijackers who carried out the September 11 attacks in 2001.” So maybe the relations with politicians and law enforcement were not that strong, and Ammar may have “known of” other terrorists in Gaza.
Why anybody would move there from San Diego, “America’s finest city,” is hard to fathom, but Ammar told the San Diego Union-Tribune he “lived in Gaza from ages 8 to 12.”
Born in 1989, that would put Ammar’s Gaza stretch from 1997 to 2001,
year of the 9/11 attack and “five years after President Bill Clinton got
the Israelis and Palestinians to sign a peace agreement. Sadly, that
peace didn’t last, and Gaza devolved into a war zone — the Second
Intifada.” The former Obama official wasn’t done.
“As a proud Mexican Palestinian American,
witnessing a U.S.-brokered peace collapse into a U.S.-funded war was an
early lesson on how fragile things can be. I remember the first night
of bombing, the entire city of Gaza had its electricity cut off, and I,
my mom, stepmom, dad and younger brothers hid in the dark corner of a
cold kitchen floor as Apache helicopters and F-16s leveled surrounding
buildings and carpet-bombed the town for hours.”
Note the joint presence of “mom and
stepmom.” Ammar has two mommies, and a daddy who allegedly “migrated to
the USA on a student visa” but is also a Palestinian Authority official in Gaza. His own time in Gaza, Ammartold Rolling Stone, was “a veryObamaesque,Dreams of Your Father, situation.”
Despite attendance at an Islamic school
that was part of a mosque, Ammar comes billed as a Christian. His mother
is Catholic and as a teenager, “he spent time as a teenager living with a great-uncle who is a Catholic priest,” but the priest is not named or interviewed in the story. It’s not clear when, exactly, Ammar abandoned Islam but the story stuck. It was hardly the only example of deceptive behavior.
As La Prensa San Diego revealed, the Islamic student once went by the name Ammar Yasser Najjar, and only changed it to Ammar “Campa-Najjar” when he ran for Congress in 2018. Rolling Stone billed him as a “a rockstar Democratic candidate.”
He ran as a progressive and lost to Duncan Hunter. In 2020, the son of
Yasser Najjar styled himself as a moderate conservative and lost to
Darrell Issa.
The congressional loser had never held
public office or served on any local community board, commission, or
civic group in the city of Chula Vista, near San Diego, where he ran for
mayor in 2022. Despite more than 700 mail-in ballots with either
non-matching or missing signatures, the Obama Democrat lost to Republican John McCann. In August, the former Obama White House official joined the U.S. Navy.
“Today, in front
of my family, friends, my grandmother in heaven and God, I stood aboard
the USS Midway and swore an oath to preserve, protect and defend our
nation as a commissioned United States Navy Officer,” Ammar told People Magazine, quoting Winston Churchill that as a reservist he was now “twice the citizen.”
The former Ammar Yasser Najjar claimed he first
tried to join up at age 17, but as People’s Virginia Chamlee explained,
“his mother refused to sign off on the decision, due to his father
being away at the time.” In similar style, Ammar told Robin Abcarian of
the Los Angeles Times that “he’d always wanted to serve in the military, and even tried to enlist at 17 before his mother put a stop to it.”
Neither journalist specified whether that was the mother or the step-mother Ammar previously mentioned. And no comment from Yasser Najjar, the Palestinian Authority official in Gaza who somehow migrated to the USA on a student visa.
“The military doesn’t have the luxury of
getting into these cultural disputes trying to divide us,” the officer
told Abcarian. “Where some people have seen my heritage, my background
as a liability, the Navy says those are not liabilities, they are
assets. A command of the Arab language, fluent in Spanish, having lived
in the Middle East, my cultural competency gives us a strategic
advantage. . . My Arabic is actually more fluent than my Spanish.”
Abcarian found Campa-Najjar to be
somewhat “guarded” but accepted his contention that he was done with
politics, “at least for now.” The columnist might cast a glance at his Wikipedia entry.
“Ammar Campa-Najjar is a United States naval officer,” it begins, as though he had graduated Annapolis and commanded a carrier.
His father Yasser Najjar “was an important internal critic of
Palestinian hardliners” and during his time in Gaza, “he attempted to
counteract the rising influence of Hamas.” Grandfather Muhammad Abu Yousef al-Najjar “has been the subject of significant controversy,” and so on.
On Sunday, nearly a thousand pro-Hamas demonstrators gathered in San Diego, but if the newly minted naval officer showed up, he did not speak to reporters. At this writing, his former White House colleague Rumana Ahmed has also been on the quiet side.
“In 2011, I was hired, straight out of college, to work at the White House and eventually the National Security Council,” Ahmed told the Atlantic in 2017. In that role, Ahmed became senior adviser to Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, a big-time promoter of the Iran deal. That was an easy sell to reporters, Rhodes quipped, because they “literally know nothing.”
If that seems a stretch, check out the establishment media reporting on the man formerly known as Ammar Nasser Najjar. He’sthe Palestinian Mexican-American with two mommies, who moved to Gaza. He’s the Islamic school student who became a Christian and seeks to restore “the original glow that once graced the face of Islam.”
The rockstar Democratic candidate is in the Navy now, and a Senate seat is up for grabs. As Donald Trump likes to say, we’ll have to see what happens.
Lloyd
Billingsley is the author of Yes I Con: United Fakes of America, Barack
‘Em Up: A Literary Investigation, Hollywood Party, and numerous other
works.
Sexual chaos in the Arab world drives some of its grotesque violence
During the attack on
Israel, a member of Hamas grabs a Jewish girl. He lies down on top of
her, comes to orgasm, stands up, and shoots her. What kind of sadistic
twists were already present in his head that allowed the softness of
sexual relations to be entwined with the violence of murder?
No one asks this question in America
because it means looking deeper than most people want. But it needs to
be asked since it is central to the problem of future peace or the lack
thereof. Everyone knows there are cultural differences between people.
Do some differences make it impossible to co-mingle groups? Yes, indeed!
It is particularly true in the case of Arabs and Jews.
Sexuality
between family members among the Jews is seen as destructive to family
unity. Violations are condemned roundly. Among Arabs, sexuality is part
of the family package. The most common manifestation is polygamy. Most
American women expect exclusivity in marriage. It provides financial and
social security, as well as clear lines of inheritance for their
children.
This is a complex topic since most Arab males do not
engage in polygamy. Nonetheless, it is incumbent upon Westerners to
understand that polygamy may be the force that most disrupts relations
between Arabs and Westerners, because it causes an unnatural social
condition where there is a chronic shortage of women. If one man takes
four wives, three men go without. It is an arithmetical inevitability.
In the olden days, this problem was
addressed by attacking neighboring villages to kill the men and take the
girls and women. Always the strong killing the weak. Moreover, these
extra men made up a willing army to go to war since success led to
family life, status, and a slave to keep house while the husband sat at
the coffee house with his friends. This situation is best described as
“women as objects.”
For
the man, sexual appetite was always to be fulfilled upon demand. This
made for some really unhappy women. Failure of the woman to comply or be
happy about it could easily lead to the entrance of a new and younger
wife. All children belonged to the men, so divorce would lead to women
alone on the street, bereft of their children and means of support.
Now,
we get to the hub of things. All men of every culture have always been
exempt from diaper changing. There has always been the small but not
zero possibility of his making the child into a sexual object—boy or
girl—especially if marital relations were strained. Unfortunately, this
insight is true of women as well, especially under conditions of
unhappiness.
There is also the issue of the ever-present pure
ignorance of the consequences of early sexual arousal. The infant,
toddler, or child—as an object—is not in control of the stimulation of
the one or the other parent. It is my contention that such early
stimulation creates a form of confusion of sexuality and violence on the
one hand and affection on the other.
Non-sexual affection draws
the youngest members of the family closer together with parents,
siblings, cousins, aunts, and uncles, and even the occasional strangers
who enter the house like family friends. However, if sexuality is
imposed by others (including all of the above), that makes people,
particularly children, afraid of one another. Sex is always an
imposition. Thus, the need for affection that undercuts the innate
violence of the sexual act.
The thesis here is that the dysfunctional Arab family reflects how sexuality is manifest in the early lives of the children.
I
want to be very clear: In general, good, nice, and kind people
(including Muslims) have been protected socially and sexually during
their earliest years. Later, such people can offer affection and
manifest altruism.
Children who have been abused socially and/or
sexually from infancy will show various levels of pathology as adults.
This is a simplified understanding of adult psychopathology that can
arise from multiple sources, but being used as a sexual object early in
life is a form of violence that makes later sexual expression a problem
for the individual, perhaps without an easy, or even any, solution.
Most males in the Western world could not
seek affection and closeness during sexual expression and then stand up
and kill their partners. In the United States, we lock people up who
rape and then murder.
Social structures that induce anger between
men and women become a systematic source of their individual
pathologies. Here, the social pathology is a mixing of sexuality and
violence. Thus, war and rape have always been linked.
Still, there
are differences between cultures. A nitwit whose name I’ve deliberately
forgotten wrote a master’s thesis at Hebrew University arguing that
Israeli soldiers do not rape Arab women during war because the soldiers
are racist.
No, nitwit! The confusion between anger and sex is the
pathological state. Gazan men apparently have received the lion’s share
of this confusion from their earliest childhoods, as demonstrated by
their actions in Israel. This conflation of sex and anger rolls from one
generation to the next with permission and support from cultural norms.
Islamic Jew-Hatred, Dhimmitude and the Doctrine of Sacred Space
For certain entities, the existence of Israel - and Jews - is intolerable.
In the wake of the savage HAMAS attack
against Israel on the morning of 7 October 2023, many are waking up to
its genocidal intent against Jews. Understandably, there are memories of
pogroms past, of the horrific toll of the Holocaust, and references to
“Nazis” and the “Einsatzgruppen”.
This time, though, as Israel prepares to do what must be done to wipe
out the HAMAS presence in Gaza, we need to understand exactly who and
what it is: an Islamic terror group, dedicated to the destruction of the
Jewish State of Israel and the killing of as many Jews as possible. We
might start with the HAMAS Covenant,
published in 1988, the year that HAMAS was formally established. Its
opening lines tell us exactly who HAMAS is and why it exists:
“Israel will exist and will continue to exist until
Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it” (The
Martyr, Imam Hassan alBanna, of blessed memory).
We’ll note here that this quote is from Hassan al-Banna, the 1928
founder of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. And here is the motto of the
Muslim Brotherhood:
‘Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the
Quran is our law; Jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our
highest aspiration.’
Why this fanatical hatred? We find the answer in the Qur’an, in the
Islamic doctrine of Sacred Space, and the laws of dhimmitude. The
Qur’an, believed by Muslims to be the literal word of Allah (the Arabic
word for “God”), lays the foundation for HAMAS’ visceral Jew-hatred.
Those who reject (Truth) among the People of the Book
[Christians and Jews]…will be in Hell-fire…They are the worst of
creatures. (Q 98:6)
But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and kill the infidels wherever ye find them… (Q 9:5)
Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith [Islam]…(Q 5:78)
The HAMAS Covenant also includes this quote from the hadith collection of Sahih Muslim:
Judgment Day will not come until you fight the Jews and
kill them. The Jews will hide behind stones and trees, and the stones
and trees will call: Oh, Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew
behind me, come and kill him…
Then there is the historical record, which informs us of the Islamic
institution of dhimmitude and the doctrine of Sacred Space. As the
armies of Islam overran formerly Christian and Jewish lands in the 7th century, there were too many to kill or convert; and so, beginning with the 638 CE Pact of Umar (the 2nd
Caliph), the institution of the Ahl al-Dhimma was established to
subjugate Christians and Jews to a rigid set of rules that would
relegate them to a legally enforced inferior status intended to be so
onerous as to compel them to convert to Islam.
Along with dhimmitude, the Muslim conquests developed a concept known
as “Sacred Space”. That is, the Dar al-Islam (House of Islam) must
conquer all the Dar al-Harb (House of War) because according to Islam,
the entire world belongs to Islam and must be conquered and subjugated
to it. Once conquered and/or occupied, such land is waqf, forever
endowed to Muslims by Allah. Any such waqf, if ever lost to Islam, must
be fought for by jihad until it is re-conquered.
As we look at the modern-day Jewish State of Israel, we can see that
the Jewish people not only are no longer dhimmis but have established a
powerful country in their ancestral homeland. These remarkable
accomplishments are intolerable to the forces of jihad and help to
explain why HAMAS and other Islamic terror groups like it have been so
intent upon wiping Israel from the face of the map.
Since the terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas, college campus rallies in support of the barbaric act have erupted across the nation. Although world focus is on Israel, this is only one part of the global plan of Islam.
Islamic law -- Shari’ah -- requires Jihad to be waged as "warfare against non-Muslims” until all the world is under Islamic law. Jihadist doctrine is advanced by both violent techniques and “civilization jihad,” a stealth subversive effort to destroy Western civilization from within a nation by its own hand. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Shari’ah, and then finally take over a nation. American education is a prime target.
For decades, billions of petro-dollars have been donated to American universities for the purpose of altering public opinion and U.S. foreign policies. This subversive shaping of the mindset has reached a wide swath of American society through students studying for careers in banking, business, law, public health, education, and urban studies. Through university outreach, programs on the Middle East are developed and provided to K-12 and adult education students.
Gifts to American universities are designed also to enhance the image of the Arab states and their rulers, effectively tamping down public criticism of Muslim hostility to Jews as well as Christians. One of the more recent donors and the largest investor in universities, Qatar has an image problem as a funder and supporter of both terrorist groups -- Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood -- and as home base to the rabidly anti-Israel, anti-American Al Jazeera.
Former English diplomat John Kelly noted, “They expect a return upon their donations to institutions of learning and their subsidies to publishing houses; whether it be in the form of subtle propaganda on behalf of Arab or Islamic causes, or the preferential admission of their nationals, however unqualified... or the publication of the kind of sycophantic flim-flam about themselves and their countries which now clutters sections of the Western press and even respectable periodical literature.”
Arab donations between 1986 and October 2022 totally nearly $11 billion with more than 10,000 contracts and gifts spread across 273 institutions. The total is grossly underestimated because numerous donations have gone unreported. Beginning with Aramco’s funding in the early 1950s, donors from Arab states have quietly made contributions to American universities, hijacking the field of Middle East Studies with faculty, including college presidents, who have been bought for 30 pieces of silver and are using their positions to advance political agendas that are pro-Arab/Palestinian, anti-Israel, and pro-radical Islam.
Though the far Left has never had any real political power, it has controlled the social and cultural narrative. During the summer of 2020, academics defended looting and/or supported the destruction of the nuclear family while Fortune 500 CEOs did nothing. The most extreme actions actually enjoyed greater publicity.
The brutality of Hamas in murdering babies, raping women, and taking the elderly and disabled as hostages was cheered on by left-wing student groups. Academics also weighed in. A Cornell University professor speaking at a recent pro-Palestine rally called the attacks “exhilarating.” A Stanford University instructor told her Jewish students to stand in a corner like “Israel does to Palestinians.” Other academics have posted their support on social media. Administrators remained silent.
Now it seems the radical Left has gone too far. People are standing up and saying enough is enough. It began with Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund billionaire who learned of an open letter signed by over 30 student groups from Harvard -- his alma mater -- that blamed Israel instead of Hamas for the murders. Ackman and several other CEOs contacted Harvard to get a list of the members of each Harvard organization that issued the letter. They are refusing to hire anyone who signed the letter. Job offers to some graduates already have been rescinded.
Marc Rowan, the chairman of the board of overseers at Wharton who donated $50 million to the school in 2018, called for donors to cease any further donations until the university’s leadership changes. Vahan Gureghian, a member of the University of Pennsylvania’s board of trustees, resigned. The Huntsman family announced they have closed their checkbook on all future giving to Penn. David Magerman, who helped build the trading systems of Renaissance Technologies, said he will cease funding to Penn. The 80th richest man in the world, Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer and his wife Batia, resigned from the executive board of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.
Others followed. Playboycut ties with the porn star Mia Khalifa for cheerleading the massacres in Israel.
Meanwhile, all those rabid Harvard activists who gleefully signed a pro-murder statement were in a blind panic and tried to explain away their participation, saying they did not read the letter. Sure. Are we to believe that very smart Harvard students do not read before they sign? The public should beware of Harvard-educated lawyers. At the end, all students removed their names. They are learning that actions do have consequences.
First there was Bud Light and then Target, followed by the snowballing scandal surrounding Ibram Kendi’s antiracism center at Boston University. With the loss of donors, university administrations suddenly see the virtue in institutional neutrality. Harvard, Northwestern, and Stanford’s presidents have issued statements that they will cease responding to political, geopolitical, or social issues that do not directly impact the core mission of their universities. They should have adopted this policy long ago. These cocky academics seem to care little that the public has lost confidence in higher education and, more especially, in elite universities.
As Ackman pointed out, “None of these institutions are solvent without the support of their alumni. Perhaps this is the beginning of a catalyst for change.” The question is whether it is too late for these arrogant institutions to regain their reputations.
Most important is that no foreign money be allowed to flow into our educational institutions to shape the mindset of students and influence American policy to support a radical ideology. Since its birth in 1987, Hamas has declared its aim is to destroy Israel. The fact is this Islamic terrorist group intends to annihilate not just Jews but anyone who is not a Muslim.
The pro-Hamas rallies where students celebrated the mass murders and beheadings show just how successful the indoctrination has been. Since the United States shares with Israel the greatest number of the world's Jewish population, allowing radical Islamic indoctrination of students creates an enemy within and poses a dire threat to our national security.
Now it seems the radical Left has gone too far. People are standing up and saying enough is enough. It began with Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund billionaire who learned of an open letter signed by over 30 student groups from Harvard -- his alma mater -- that blamed Israel instead of Hamas for the murders. Ackman and several other CEOs contacted Harvard to get a list of the members of each Harvard organization that issued the letter. They are refusing to hire anyone who signed the letter. Job offers to some graduates already have been rescinded.
