Monday, April 15, 2019


Bernie Sanders Delights Democrats With Plan For Free Healthcare For Illegals

Source: AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana
Bernie Sanders, that socialist curmudgeon we love to hate, has come up with a new way to smother American prosperity: FREE healthcare for illegal aliens. 
As has become expected in these neo-socialist times, Democrats were delighted by the proposition of robbing hardworking Americans for the benefit of those who break federal laws
But when Bastard Bernie says FREE, what does that mean? Redistribution of wealth via taxation, of course. Take monies from the rightful owner by force and intimidation and give it to the wrongful owner. What does Bastard Bernie get out of it? Power and control over the unethical transaction. That power, the ability to say who keeps what is the ultimate control; for no one can control their own destiny, only Bastard Bernie and the other glorified thieves in power control each American's destiny when they take your money. The more that he takes from you, the more power he has over you, and the less you control your own life. This is precisely why taxation amounts to economic slavery. 
Bernie Sanders understands better than anyone, that the one who controls the money is the one who controls freedom and destiny. If Bastard Bernie doesn't take your earnings from you, then you maintain power and control over your life and your destiny. If, on the other hand, he takes what you earned, then you and your labor belong to the state. When Bastard Bernie hands your cash to illegals, he simultaneously hands them control over your life. This is exactly what Bastard Bernie wants: to dilute your control over your own destiny. Bernie now also wants to give illegal immigrants power over you. 
This diabolical plan for the diminution of Americans isn't restricted to Bastard Bernie; he is joined by the other democrat neo-socialists like Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, and Kirstin Gillibrand. They call their politics by various names in an attempt to convolute and conceal the simplistic socialism that drives their agenda. Don't get lost in the words they use; just look at what they are plotting. They advocate for increased taxation, redistribution, and government control over your life. Bernie Sander's bill "Medicare for All" was co-sponsored by these con-artists, and their control effort would cost you an estimated $32 trillion. Nice people.
More harrowingly, the neo-democrats prioritize the interests of illegal immigrants over the basic needs of the Americans who they are sworn to represent. But why are illegal immigrants of particular interest all of a sudden? 
On the one hand, because democrats prey on weakness or the appearance of weakness, and illegal immigrants are the perceptively weak concern du jour that strikes the Democrats' fancy. That's it; there's not much more or less to it. On the whole, Democrats are not deeply concerned with the plight of an illegal immigrant; they are just using these people to advance their political agenda amongst their bleeding-heart base. Remember how the Democrats were vividly trying to save the whales in the '90s? Whatever happened to the whales? Who's saving them nowadays? Maybe they went the way of the ozone hole that was all the craze in the '80s. Do you ever wonder what the illegal immigrants were doing in the '80s and '90s when the ozone and the whales were the weaklings du jour?
Donald Trump is the reason why illegals became the attraction of the day, as they are the group he is attempting to regulate, rendering them weaklings du jour for Democrats. Had Trump decided to build a barrier to keep dangerous sharks away from U.S. beaches, then "Save The Sharks!" would have been the prime democratic platform. Anything anti-trump is magically and automatically converted into pro-democrats. This how the gays and Islamists came to political joinder in the same party; they call this "intersectionality."
On the other hand, because Democrats are clawing at well walls, trying to find a way out of the deep loss to Donald Trump. They need more bodies, more votes. It's a bid to stay in power. Aside from attempting to entice illegals with free healthcare, they are also attempting to give illegals the right to vote, followed by attempting to change the American voting system to be a rule by majority, which they would easily get if illegals can vote for the hand that feeds them. It's all about power, about control. It's about eroding America and capitalism. 
Think about the Democrats' plan from the perspective of a would-be illegal border crosser. The proposition that those who break U.S. laws will be rewarded with admiration and riches in the form of Spoils of Taxation, is a rather attractive bargain. Why not break the border law? You will receive free lawyers, free food, free shelter, free healthcare, free legal advice from a local Sanctuary Sheriff, and unfettered admiration by the neo-socialist clique growing in the United States. Seems too good to pass up, no? 
Neo-socialism is a lucrative invitation for the illegal bypass of American laws.
Sanctuary Cities Welcome Illegal Aliens with ‘Open Arms’ While 38K American Veterans Remain Homeless

In this Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2013 photo, homeless Korean War veteran Thomas Moore, 79, left, speaks with Boston Health Care for the Homeless street team outreach coordinator Romeena Lee on a sidewalk in Boston. Moore, who said he accidentally killed his best friend with a phosphorous grenade during one firefight …
AP Photo/Steven Senne

Sanctuary cities across the United States are responding to President Donald Trump’s threat to bus border crossers and illegal aliens to their jurisdictions, saying they plan to welcome all illegal immigration with “open arms” despite soaring homelessness problems.

Last week, Trump threatened to bus border crossers and illegal aliens into sanctuary cities and states, like California and New York City, if the country’s asylum laws were not changed. White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders on Sunday confirmed that the White House is considering the plan.
“The USA has the absolute legal right to have apprehended illegal immigrants transferred to Sanctuary Cities,” Trump posted on Twitter over the weekend. “We hereby demand that they be taken care of at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known or it’s poor management & high taxes!”

Just out: The USA has the absolute legal right to have apprehended illegal immigrants transferred to Sanctuary Cities. We hereby demand that they be taken care of at the highest level, especially by the State of California, which is well known or its poor management & high taxes!

Sanctuary city mayors like Oakland, California, Mayor Libby Schaaf have responded to Trump’s threat by saying they plan to welcome any and all illegal aliens to their cities — even those cities that are struggling with rising homelessness. Currently, there are nearly 38,000 homeless American veterans across the country.
“Oakland welcomes all, no matter where you came from or how you got here,” Schaaf wrote on Twitter.
As of 2017, there were more than 2,700 Oakland residents who were homeless — an increase of 25 percent when compared to two years before. In all of Alameda County, there are about 5,630 homeless residents. In all of California, there are nearly 130,000 homeless residents, including nearly 11,000 homeless American Veterans.
Sanctuary city New York City’s Mayor Bill de Blasio originally blasted Trump for the plan, claiming the president was using illegal aliens as “chess pieces,” but he then advocated for giving illegal aliens driver’s licenses in order to attract more illegal aliens to the state.
“Undocumented immigrants are our neighbors and part of the backbone of our economy,” de Blasio wrote online. “It’s mind-boggling that they aren’t allowed to have driver’s licenses in New York State.”
New York City homelessness has reached the highest levels since the 1930s when the country struggled through the Great Depression. Today, there are nearly 64,000 homeless residents in New York City, including more than 15,000 homeless families with almost 23,000 homeless children. This is the largest metro area homeless population in the country. There are more than 1,200 homeless American veterans living in New York state.
In interviews with the Daily Beast, sanctuary city mayors from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Chicago, Illinois; and Cambridge, Massachusetts, said their jurisdictions would be happy to welcome all illegal aliens.
Philadelphia, Chicago, and Cambridge have a combined homeless population of at least 12,000 residents. In the state of Massachusetts, alone, there are now more than 20,000homeless residents, including almost 1,000 homeless American veterans.
“The city would be prepared to welcome these immigrants just as we have embraced our immigrant communities for decades,” Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney said.
“As a welcoming city, we would welcome these migrants with open arms, just as we welcomed Syrian refugees, just as we welcomed Puerto Ricans displaced by Hurricane Maria and just as we welcome Rohingya refugees fleeing genocide in Myanmar,” Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel said.
Burlington, Vermont, Mayor Miro Weinberger said in a statement that illegal aliens were vital to making his city “more prosperous” and “more diverse.”
“We know from decades of experience that newcomers to Burlington will make us more prosperous, more diverse and stronger, just as generations of past immigrants have driven our past growth and success,” Weinberger said.
In total, there are more than 550,000 American residents who are homeless nationwide. Meanwhile, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million illegal and legal immigrants every year — the overwhelming majority of which are low skilled workers who compete for jobs against America’s poor, working, and middle class. The Washington, DC-imposed mass immigration policy drives housing costs up for Americans, economists have found.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.


For all of  Bernie Sanders talk about leading “political revolution” against the “billionaire class,” Sanders backed Clinton, a shill of Wall Street and the Pentagon, who has nothing but contempt for the tens of millions of workers devastated by the 2008 financial crash and Obama’s pro-corporate policies.


MILLIONAIRE PHONY SOCIALISM BERNIE’S LA RAZA SOCIALISM to keep the “cheap” labor flowing into our jobs

 Bernie supports immigration reform that will address the legal status of the 11 million undocumented people  (EXCEPT THERE ARE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS HERE ALREADY) in our country, protect American jobs by way of visa reform, secure the border, and protect undocumented workers from labor exploitation.
The website states that Sanders supports a pathway to citizenship for all people who are in the United States illegally, the Dream Act, “Visa reform” and border security “without building a fence.”
Sanders also voted for the “Gang of Eight” immigration bill in 2013 that would have given amnesty to all of the people in the United States illegally.
According to the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s 2017 report, illegal immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not an outlier: a recent study by the Heritage Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants (including those here illegally) cost Americans trillions over the course of their lifetimes, and a study from the National Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration costs America over $140 billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are a massive burden on American taxpayers.
BERNIE SANDERS MAKES DIRECT APPEAL TO RUST BELT MIDDLE-AMERICA… but fails to tell them he wants amnesty for 40 million looting Mexicans so they can bring up the rest of their families and vote Democrat for more.

"This dangerous power vacuum has fueled frustration and created an entirely new breed of disenfranchised voters who are fed up with the status quo. These are real people, their anger is palpable, and it’s not going away anytime soon."

Why Do Young People Find Socialism So Attractive?

To anyone over the age of 40, the growing appeal of socialist policies within the younger generations can be confusing.  To us, this nation's capitalist system has provided the highest standard of living the world has ever seen, while "socialism" repeatedly leads to totalitarian governments like China and the USSR and destroys once prosperous nations like Venezuela.  One must wonder if our younger generations live in the same world as we do.  Do they not see the same things we see?
The answer to these questions is a resounding no.  The younger generations are growing up in a nation and a world vastly different from the ones in which Americans over the age of 40 were raised.  What they see is therefore filtered through an equally offset lens.
People over the age of 40 saw their parents and grandparents work stable jobs for the entirety of their careers — often with a single parent earning enough to support an entire family.  They saw their parents pay into Social Security, and then those same parents drew on those funds upon retirement.  Their parents had college degrees without debt.  They could access health care without concern that it would bankrupt them.  They trusted the safety and competence of the public education system.  They trusted elected officials to be honest and to obey the laws of the offices given to them.  If their parents failed economically, there was a familial and religious culture that could combine with government programs to help them.
American children today have largely seen the opposite.  American workers are routinely replaced by imported foreign workers and by outsourcing to foreign lands.  Immigrants and illegal aliens massively drive down labor costs, requiring both parents to work to sustain an ever shrinking family.  Everyone pays into Social Security, but no one under the age of thirty believes that it will remain in place for him to draw from when needed.  The cost of college is unsustainable.  No one trusts elected officials.  Everyone feels that a single injury or illness will destroy his finances for decades.  For many of us, it feels as if the prevailing sentiment of the now multicultural society is to cheer for our economic failure.
The America of today is starkly divided into two groups: a group that already accesses America as a socialist entity and a group that pays for that system but has no access to it.
For the first group, America is already a largely socialist government.  Members draw their subsistence from government welfare programs and can receive as much as $1,000 a month for simply not committing crimes.  Health care is largely subsidized or simply free, as the recipients either have no money or cannot be traced due to their lack of registration with the government.  Food and housing are often subsidized as well, through federal or state programs.  They are also given preference in access to education and access to programs to offset the cost of that education.  Many of them who receive those benefits are citizens of other nations residing here illegally, but they still receive both the preferential access and offset costs denied to citizens and even veterans.
For the second group, they and their parents have paid into this system through taxes for their entire lives, yet they have seen few, if any, of the benefits to that payment.  They are on no government programs.  While violent illegal aliens are protected from prosecution, members of this second group receive harsh punishment for even minor nonviolent offenses.  Any injury results in massive costs, and they are always fighting to keep jobs with shrinking wages and no security.
To members of this second group, the implementation of government policies that promise them at least a minimal return on the payments they are making into that system is a relief.  This is how the younger generation of Americans view a "socialist" model, and this is why they see potential in it.
To young Americans, a system that promises minimal access to equality with other classes living in the U.S. is preferable to a capitalist model that robs them of all funds, all options, and all dignity while providing benefits only to other groups.  Access to a terrible health care system is still better than one that will bankrupt you if you touch it.  Access to a low-quality but free university system may still be preferable to one that is inaccessible due to race and will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if you are given the ability to attend.  The guarantee of a poorly funded safety net is still better than one that isn't there at all.
The younger generation of Americans do not fear a totalitarian state, where they pay into a system in which the benefits can be accessed only by those with government influence, because younger Americans are already living in that state. The only difference is that those who are receiving the benefit of their labor are not some elite class of rulers from among their own people, but rather those who have the political and cultural power to redirect that wealth.  This is namely a migrant class that has become the dominant force in American politics as well as other groups that have been able to establish power to give themselves legal preferences in education, contracting, and protections.
To pull the younger generation back from the lure of "socialism," we must demonstrate both that the rule of law still applies within the U.S. and reassert equality under the law — without delay and without exception.  The government must also provide a minimal level of care and benefits for those who pay into the system without allowing threats of violence to pull those resources to citizens of other nations or to be used disproportionately on those who rely solely on those benefits for generations without efforts to rise above those benefits.

In short, the government must cease working for others and once again work for its citizens and stop calling that "socialism."

THE MEXICAN INVASION: A Partnership Between Mexico and the Democrat Party

Mexico has made a mess of the caravans

My friends down in Mexico cannot believe what they are watching. In other words, they've always known that Mexico is complicit in sending its own north of the border, i.e. U.S.$33 billion in remittances is all you need to know about this.
Or as a friend said: "Dólares que ayudan mucho"— dollars that help a lot!
My point is that every level-headed Mexican has always known that his country has grown dependent on those "dólares."
What Mexicans don't understand is why their country is now an avenue for Central Americans.  They don't understand it because it seems like a shift from the very tough policies against illegal immigration over the years.
As another friend said: "Ésto no se parece al Mexico que yo recuerdo," or, loosely translated, this is not the Mexico I remember.
Over the weekend, a group of Central Americans crashed the gate, as we see in this report:
Mexican authorities said a group of about 350 migrants broke the locks on a gate at the Guatemalan border Friday and forced their way into southern Mexico to join a larger group of migrants trying to make their way toward the United States.
The National Immigration Institute did not identify the nationalities of the migrants, but they are usually from Central America.
We learned later that the "crashers" included more than Central Americans.  In fact, they come from other countries, too.
I have not done a scientific survey, but my friends can't figure out why Mexico is not shutting down its southern border.
At some point, this is going to turn into a huge political problem for Presidente López-Obrador.  Simply put, Mr. LO is dropping the ball big time.
PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.


THE GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA… first ease millions of illegals over our borders and into our voting booths!

 How the Democrat party surrendered America to Mexico:

“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.”  Washington Times

"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!

The “zero tolerance” program was dismantled by Attorney General Erc Holder once it had successfully cut the transit of migrants by roughly 95 percent. Initially, officials made 140,000 arrests per year in the mid-2000s, but the northward flow dropped so much that officials only had to make 6,000 arrests in 2013, according to a 2014 letter by two pro-migration Senators, Sen. Jeff Flake and John McCain.

The cost of the Dream Act is far bigger than the Democrats or their media allies admit. Instead of covering 690,000 younger illegals now enrolled in former President Barack Obama’s 2012 “DACA” amnesty, the Dream Act would legalize at least 3.3 million illegals, according to a pro-immigration group, the Migration Policy Institute.”

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)

Ex-Obama Border Patrol Chief: Immigration Crisis Is Worst ‘in the History of the Country’

TOPSHOT - Central American migrants heading in caravan to the US rest beside the road between Metapa and Tapachula in Mexico on April 12, 2019. - A group of 350 Central American migrants forced their way into Mexico Friday, authorities said, as a new caravan of around 2,500 people arrived …

Mark Morgan, who served as U.S. Border Patrol chief during the Obama administration, told Fox Business Network host Maria Bartiromo on Monday that the U.S.-Mexico border crisis has reached historic proportions.

A partial transcript is as follows: 
MARIA BARTIROMO: First, give us your sense of what is taking place at the border. Because it’s amazing to me, when I see these pictures which certainly look like a crisis, and yet, we can’t get the attention of, like, a Jerry Nadler or Nancy Pelosi in terms of actually doing something about these loopholes in the immigration law.
MARK MORGAN: Yeah, Maria, make no mistake, and I’ve been trying to get out here — this isn’t just a crisis, this is a crisis like we’ve never experienced in the history of this country since we started tracking numbers. And again, we’ve had that talk and that’s because of the demographics. There’s still this very false talking point out there that —
well, back in the ’90s, the numbers were higher — over a million.” Well, first of all, again, you got to remember they were Mexican adults, we were moving, deporting 90 percent of them. With the broken asylum laws and other loopholes that are there, we’re seeing 65 to 70 percent increase in family units, and because of those broken laws, we’re allowing them in. This year, we’re expected to hit a million, but we’re going to let 650,000 into the country. That’s driving this crisis, driving our resources, being overwhelmed. We have to address it.


"We live in a moment that compels us each to act,” he said. “The forces changing our country are tectonic — forces that help to explain what made this current presidency even possible. That's why this time it's not just about winning an election — it's about winning an era." PETE  BUTTIGIEG

Joe Scarborough: Mayor Pete Buttigieg as Exciting as Ronald Reagan

South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg greets guests after announcing that he will be seeking the Democratic nomination for president during a rally in the old Studebaker car factory on April 14, 2019 in South Bend, Indiana. Buttigieg has been drumming up support for his run during several recent campaign swings …
Scott Olson/Getty Images

MSNBC cable news host and former Republican Joe Scarborough expressed amazement at the 2020 campaign launch of South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg on Sunday.

“In a lifetime of following politics, the only time I have heard as excited a reaction to a campaign as I heard today about Pete Buttigieg’s launch was Barack Obama in 2008 and Ronald Reagan in 1980,” he wrote on Twitter.
Buttigieg officially announced his run for president on Sunday.
“Yes, it’s very early. But the reaction has been remarkable,” Scarborough added.
Scarborough played a role in boosting Buttigieg’s national attention during a March interview on Morning Joe.
Mika and I have been overwhelmed by the reaction Pete Buttigieg got after being on the show,” he wrote afterward. “The only other time in twelve years that we heard from as many people about a guest was after Barack Obama appeared on Morning Joe.”

In a lifetime of following politics, the only time I have heard as excited a reaction to a campaign as I heard today about @PeteButtigieg’s launch was @BarackObama in 2008 and Ronald Reagan in 1980.
Yes, it’s very early. But the reaction has been remarkable.

Mika and I have been overwhelmed by the reaction @PeteButtigieg got after being on the show. The only other time in twelve years that we heard from as many people about a guest was after @BarackObama appeared on Morning Joe.