Friday, April 13, 2012

OBAMA and HIS BANKSTERS - Their Looting Continues - JUDICIAL WATCH

JW and Client Vern McKinley Challenge Bernanke Over Bailouts in W. Times Op-Ed
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has been peddling his own version of events regarding the government's unprecedented decision to bailout large swaths of the private sector. Not content to allow this fiction to go unchallenged, on Wednesday, I co-authored an opinion editorial with Vern McKinley, a former employee of the Federal Reserve and a Judicial Watch client.

The following is reprinted in its entirety with permission from The Washington Times:


MCKINLEY AND FITTON: Bernanke's fairy tale recession story for kids
Records show Fed had no coherent strategy for bank bailouts

It's an oldie but a goodie for our Federal Reserve chairman. In one of his recent lectures at George Washington University (GWU), Ben S. Bernanke made the self-congratulatory assertion that the "forceful policy response" led by the Federal Reserve in 2008 helped avoid a more serious economic downturn.

This rhetoric is nothing new. Mr. Bernanke has made similar remarks in the past. As he confided in one interview, "I was not going to be the Federal Reserve chairman who presided over the second Great Depression." It is clear that like Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, who recently trumpeted the fourth anniversary of his role in the Bear Stearns bailout, Mr. Bernanke is aggressively using the GWU lectures to shape his legacy before he steps down.

During the chairman's one-hour-plus lecture, he dedicated five full minutes (and four PowerPoint slides) to a case study on AIG. In the classic dour assessments reminiscent of 2008, Mr. Bernanke used Chicken Little hyperbole, noting that the "failure of AIG, in our estimation, would have been basically the end." The chairman did not elaborate for the benefit of the students in attendance what he meant by "the end" or the precise connection between the failure of AIG and the end of financial life as we know it, but it certainly made for a dramatic moment during the lecture.

Interestingly enough, one of the GWU students pressed the chairman for more details on the decision-making process underlying interventions like what occurred with AIG. The student, identified by Mr. Bernanke as "Max," boldly questioned the chairman's methods:

"Where do you draw the line between bailing out a bank and allowing it to fail? Is it arbitrary or is there some sort of methodology?" Mr. Bernanke meandered a bit in responding to Max and eventually admitted that the process was somewhere in between arbitrary and a set methodology, noting that it was a "case-by-case process" and "somewhat ad hoc."

Let's suppose for a moment that Max wasn't satisfied with the chairman's ill-defined response and he decided to do a more in-depth analysis of the Fed's bailout of AIG for the semester's final term paper. Surely, there would be an abundance of documents available supporting the Fed's approach in the AIG case. After all, if the Fed's bailout of AIG really saved us from "the end," as Mr. Bernanke called it, the Fed should be all too happy to provide such details, and likely already has released an abundance of them.

We actually brought suit against the Fed nearly two years ago, requesting precisely that type of information. Some of the details revealed the shocking extent of the ad hoc, seat-of-the-pants nature of the analysis just days before the Fed made the AIG bailout decision. Emails produced by the Fed show confusion about basic information concerning AIG. One Fed email in particular says it all: "What do you know about AIG? Have you produced memos on them anytime recently?"

What we know from the material that was released is damaging enough but more than half of the content of the documents was redacted. We continue to this day to press the Obama administration to release details related to this bailout "success story."

In the nearly 100 years since the Fed's creation, the deeper the economic downturn, the greater the number of policy missteps by the Federal Reserve and its cohorts in Washington. This was the case in the Great Depression, which was a downturn rife with Fed policy mistakes. Similarly, the most recent downturn, although not as bad as the Great Depression, was quite deep and also involved numerous policy errors by the Fed.

Unfortunately, that's not one of the obvious lessons of financial crises that professor Bernanke shared with the GWU students.

Rather than admitting to the arbitrary and capricious nature of the bailouts, Mr. Bernanke would have us believe that he and his band of bureaucrats executed a cogent strategy to pull from the brink of disaster companies - and, indeed, a nation - that were too big to fail. The fact is that they guessed their way through the bailouts and cannot point to any cogent analysis of the costs of "inaction."

We know this because we asked. But don't expect these facts to get in the way of Mr. Bernanke's fairy tale.

Click here to read more about JW's massive bailout investigations, including the FOIA lawsuits we've filed on behalf of Vern McKinley and the documents we've uncovered so far.

Until next week...

ILLEGALS BREED A LA RAZA OCCUPATION - MEXICO ANCHORS THEIR WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS

In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls, Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG, graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes to see for yourself:



“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart by Roy Beck

This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future generations: in a word “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org



This is the best website to start: www.numbersusa.org ; watch Roy Beck’s “Immigration by the Numbers” at 14 minutes. Bi-partisan and very effective. Become a faxer of pre-written letters to your reps to make positive change.

 



*

 http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

*

CALIFORNIA – A STATE FILLED WITH ILLEGALS AND CORRUPT SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS SERVING THEIR CORPORATE RAPIST PAYMASTERS.




“So what about California? The economic well-being of many metropolitan areas in the Golden State has been sinking precipitously since 2006. This year, three California regions--Oakland, Sacramento and San Bernardino-Riverside--have sunk down into the bottom 10 on the large cities list. That's a phenomenon we've never seen before--and never expected to see.” FORBES

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/forbes-california-10-of-worst-cities.html





CALIFORNIA – MEXICO’S JOBS, WELFARE, AND “FREE” MEDICAL FOR THE MEXICANS THEY EXPORT TO LOOT OUR NATION.

WHAT? CAN’T AFFORD TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL? JUST TELL THEM  YOU’RE AN ILLEGAL. ILLEGALS ARE ALWAYS ABOVE THE LAW! THEY DRIVE WITHOUT LICENSES, TAKE OUR JOBS WITH STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, COLLECT WELFARE, AND VOTE!



Calif. Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants

*

07/05/2011 



While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government.

The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law requires facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their immigration status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually nonexistent,” according to a letter submitted by the American Hospital Association to the president.

This week officials in California, the state with the largest concentration of illegal immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation after revealing that hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to California Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.

The problem will only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion for 2010 could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them to treat patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they get stuck with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail services or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare.

Nationwide, U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free medical care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language program (Ventanillas de Salud, Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers its nationals—living in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*




http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

*

CALIFORNIA – A STATE FILLED WITH ILLEGALS AND CORRUPT SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS SERVING THEIR CORPORATE RAPIST PAYMASTERS.




“So what about California? The economic well-being of many metropolitan areas in the Golden State has been sinking precipitously since 2006. This year, three California regions--Oakland, Sacramento and San Bernardino-Riverside--have sunk down into the bottom 10 on the large cities list. That's a phenomenon we've never seen before--and never expected to see.” FORBES

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/forbes-california-10-of-worst-cities.html

*

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)

*

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

*

LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS




*

One tragic thing about this book is that it was written in 2003. Since then the Mexican occupation has doubled. Welfare to illegals is up to $20 BILLION in California. Welfare to illegals in sanctuary city Los Angeles is past $600 million per year, while Mexican gangs murder all over the state. Yet the lifer-politicians continue to fight for open borders, more perks for illegals, and their illegal votes!

*

BOOK: MEXIFORNIA – THE SHATTERING OF THE AMERICAN DREAM WITH THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION

*

"Victor Davis Hanson brings a lifetime of experience in California's Central Valley to this indictment of multiculturalism and mass immigration." -- Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies




Rise In Local, Federal Perks For Illegal Immigrants | Judicial Watch - VIVA LA RAZA?

Rise In Local, Federal Perks For Illegal Immigrants | Judicial Watch

U.S. Brags About Quality Medical Care For Detained Illegal Immigrants | Judicial Watch - A FORM OF OBAMA'S LA RAZA OBAMAcare?

U.S. Brags About Quality Medical Care For Detained Illegal Immigrants | Judicial Watch

Why Obama Is Winning the Battle for Middle America - The Atlantic - OR IS HE REALLY PRESIDENT FOR HIS WALL ST BANKSTERS, the 1% and ILLEGALS?

Why Obama Is Winning the Battle for Middle America - The Atlantic

OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS, SABOTAGED E-VERIFY, HANDED ILLEGALS HIS CATCH AND RELEASE, AND ASSAULTED FOUR AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA!

OBAMA'S ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH BANKSTERS AND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!

OBAMA'S SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS!

VIVA LA RAZA?

THANK GOD NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS HISPANDERED FOR THE ILLEGALS' VOTES MORE THAN OBAMA!


DO YOU EVER GET SICK OF THESE POLITICIANS NEVER ENDING HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES? HASN’T ANYONE TOLD THEM THAT IT’S STILL ILLEGAL FOR ILLEGALS TO VOTE???

BUT THEY ARE IN DROVES! LA RAZA IS VOTING FOR ANYONE THAT WILL HAND THEM AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, DREAM ACTS, OBAMACARE, AND NO I.D. TO VOTE!

OBAMA HAS TURNED HIS DEPT of JUSTICE ON AMERICAN TO DRIVE HIS LA RAZA AGENDA!






Obama’s State of the Campaign Address

By Alan W. Dowd

 January 26, 2012

In Daily Mailer,

It was officially called the State of the Union Address, but what President Obama actually delivered on Tuesday night was a campaign speech targeted directly at his base. The message went something like this: “Unions, environmentalists, teachers, Hispanic immigrants, women, I’m your president…I’m your candidate.”

Consider the code words and messages sprinkled throughout the speech.

The president began with a shameless signal to the Code Pink crowd and anti-war left—the folks who fueled his rise and run for the White House. “For the first time in nine years, there are no Americans fighting in Iraq,” he declared, sidestepping the unraveling situation that has emerged as a result. And he went on: “We’ve begun to wind down the war in Afghanistan. Ten thousand of our troops have come home. Twenty-three thousand more will leave by the end of this summer.” Again, never mind what is left behind.

For Big Labor, he boasted about his efforts to get “workers and automakers to settle their differences” and get a government-owned, union-run General Motors “back on top as the world’s number one automaker.”

He gratuitously mentioned a “unionized plant in Milwaukee” and cited key union cities in key states for good measure: “Detroit and Toledo and Chicago…Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”

For the teachers’ unions, he lamented how “tight budgets have forced states to lay off thousands of teachers” and called on Congress to give states “the resources to keep good teachers on the job.” Drifting into meaningless platitudes, he promised that in exchange he would support programs to “replace teachers who just aren’t helping kids learn.”

While on the subject of meaningless platitudes, the president boasted that “there are fewer illegal crossings than when I took office.” The reason for that, of course, is that he’s presiding over the worst economy in four decades. In other words, there are no jobs to entice immigrants to cross America’s southern border—legally or illegally. (See Mitch Daniels’ sparkling rebuttal for more on why.)

But the president’s main message on immigration was for the amnesty lobby: “Hundreds of thousands of talented, hardworking students in this country face another challenge: The fact that they aren’t yet American citizens. Many were brought here as small children, are American through and through, yet they live every day with the threat of deportation,” he chided. “Let’s at least agree to stop expelling responsible young people,” who, it pays to recall, are not responsible enough to legalize their status. The president’s environmental bloc had to wade through some throw-away lines. For example, his boast that the country relies “less on foreign oil than in any of the past sixteen years” has a lot to do with low demand caused by a beleaguered economy. And when he noted that “We don’t have to choose between our environment and our economy,” he failed to mention that when given the opportunity—in the form of the Keystone XL pipeline—he chose the environmental lobby rather than economic recovery.

When he finally got on message, he got on a roll. “Renewable energy use has nearly doubled,” he declared. “I will not walk away from the promise of clean energy,” he gushed. And putting our money where his mouth is, he unveiled plans to “allow the development of clean energy on enough public land to power three million homes.” He then announced his decision to dragoon the Department of Defense into the quixotic effort by directing it to “make one of the largest commitments to clean energy in history,” thus turning America’s shrinking Armed Forces into the R&D arm of his green agenda.

With lines that sounded strangely anachronistic, he rallied another important bloc of his coalition, declaring that “Women should earn equal pay for equal work.” He then vowed that he would not allow America to “go back to the days when health insurance companies had unchecked power to…charge women differently from men.”

That brings us to the crescendo of his State of the Campaign Address: the obligatory class-warfare rhetoric.

In the span of about 40 minutes, the president took credit for the automaker bailout that saved “a million jobs”—but happened to be launched in the waning hours of the Bush presidency—and then lambasted the bank bailouts.

(NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS TAKEN MORE LOOT FROM CRIMINAL BANKSTER THAN BARACK OBAMA! THERE IS A REASON!!! BANKSTERS LOOTED MORE $$$ IN THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF OBAMA’S CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION, THAN ALL EIGHT YEARS UNDER BUSH! IF YOU’RE NOT CONNECTED TO OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, YOU MUST BE A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY MEMBER TO BE A PART OF OBAMA’S “CHANGE” PERFORMANCE!)

“No bailouts, no handouts and no copouts,” he said in ripping into banks, Wall Street and a financial system that “was allowed to play by its own set of rules.”

He spoke of giving banks “a chance to repay a deficit of trust,” tried to shame Congress into ending the “tax break for the wealthiest 2 percent of Americans” and decried “the corrosive influence of money in politics.”

In a speech full of eye-rollers, that last one may take the prize. After all, it was the Obama campaign that raised millions from undisclosed donors in 2008. As Newsweek reported at the time, tens of thousands of dollars poured into the Obama campaign from “individuals” with names like “Doodad Pro” of Nunda, New York, and “Good Will” of Austin, Texas. “Good Will,” Newsweek observed, “listed his employer as ‘Loving’ and his occupation as ‘You,’ while supplying as his address 1015 Norwood Park Boulevard, which is shared by the Austin nonprofit Goodwill Industries.” Moreover, it is the Obama campaign that’s now boasting about raising $1 billion dollars for 2012.

By this time next year, we’ll know if the president’s promises have held his coalition together.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

________________________________________

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

*

OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA FOR THE LA RAZA VOTE:


*

WIKI LEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA – BUILDING A BORDERLESS TERRITORY WITH NARCOMEX:





THERE MAY BE AS HIGH AS 38 MILLION ILLEGALS VOTING IN THIS NATION! THEY ARE VOTING FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY, TO PUT MORE LA RAZA DEMS IN ELECTED OFFICE, TO EXPAND THE CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS (LA RAZA IN CONGRESS), AND FOR NO E-VERIFY, NO-STRINGS AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS, LA RAZA FIRST – NO LEGAL NEED APPLY! DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP WITH DRIVER’S LICENSES, AND FOR ENDLESS GRINGO-PAID DREAM ACTS!

Considering the racist agenda of La Raza, giving federal funds to this group is tantamount to the U.S. funding the Nazis in the 1930's. The comparison to the Nazi Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler planned to called his utopia Germania).

Karl Rove was one of the keynote speakers at this year's annual National Council of La Raza Conference. The event was held in Los Angeles (the eventual capital of Atzlan). Other speakers included Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, and the virulent racist L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.The fact that Karl Rove is the President's top political adviser and addressed the group with Bush's blessing, is a strong indicator that this nation is being subverted at the very highest levels. If La Raza was a white supremacist group with equally deep pockets, the U.S. government would place them on a terrorist watch list, infiltrate them with undercover FBI agents, and subject them to constant harassment by the Internal Revenue Service. Eventually, the group's leaders would be jailed and the group itself would be rendered irrelevant. However, because La Raza is a Latino supremacist group, the Bush administration and most of Congress offer them financial support!


LA RAZA - WILL LEGALS IN CA SURRENDER TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY? Immigration: Leave it to the feds

Immigration: Leave it to the feds





*

 http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

*

CALIFORNIA – A STATE FILLED WITH ILLEGALS AND CORRUPT SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS SERVING THEIR CORPORATE RAPIST PAYMASTERS.




“So what about California? The economic well-being of many metropolitan areas in the Golden State has been sinking precipitously since 2006. This year, three California regions--Oakland, Sacramento and San Bernardino-Riverside--have sunk down into the bottom 10 on the large cities list. That's a phenomenon we've never seen before--and never expected to see.” FORBES

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/forbes-california-10-of-worst-cities.html





CALIFORNIA – MEXICO’S JOBS, WELFARE, AND “FREE” MEDICAL FOR THE MEXICANS THEY EXPORT TO LOOT OUR NATION.

WHAT? CAN’T AFFORD TO GO TO THE HOSPITAL? JUST TELL THEM  YOU’RE AN ILLEGAL. ILLEGALS ARE ALWAYS ABOVE THE LAW! THEY DRIVE WITHOUT LICENSES, TAKE OUR JOBS WITH STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, COLLECT WELFARE, AND VOTE!



Calif. Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants

*

07/05/2011 



While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government.

The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law requires facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their immigration status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually nonexistent,” according to a letter submitted by the American Hospital Association to the president.

This week officials in California, the state with the largest concentration of illegal immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation after revealing that hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to California Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.

The problem will only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion for 2010 could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them to treat patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they get stuck with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail services or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare.

Nationwide, U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free medical care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language program (Ventanillas de Salud, Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers its nationals—living in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*




http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

*

CALIFORNIA – A STATE FILLED WITH ILLEGALS AND CORRUPT SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS SERVING THEIR CORPORATE RAPIST PAYMASTERS.




“So what about California? The economic well-being of many metropolitan areas in the Golden State has been sinking precipitously since 2006. This year, three California regions--Oakland, Sacramento and San Bernardino-Riverside--have sunk down into the bottom 10 on the large cities list. That's a phenomenon we've never seen before--and never expected to see.” FORBES

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/forbes-california-10-of-worst-cities.html

*

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)

*

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

*

LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS




*

One tragic thing about this book is that it was written in 2003. Since then the Mexican occupation has doubled. Welfare to illegals is up to $20 BILLION in California. Welfare to illegals in sanctuary city Los Angeles is past $600 million per year, while Mexican gangs murder all over the state. Yet the lifer-politicians continue to fight for open borders, more perks for illegals, and their illegal votes!

*

BOOK: MEXIFORNIA – THE SHATTERING OF THE AMERICAN DREAM WITH THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION

*

"Victor Davis Hanson brings a lifetime of experience in California's Central Valley to this indictment of multiculturalism and mass immigration." -- Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies






CALIFORNIA SURRENDERS TO LA RAZA "THE RACE" SUPREMACY - THE LA RAZA FACTION OF STATE LEGISLATURE PUSHES EXPANSION OF MEX OCCUPATION & WELFARE STATE


GIL CEDILLO, just one more corrupt Mexican bent on expanding the MEXICAN WELFARE STATE which translates into mucho votes from illegals and mucho big money from big business and  employers of illegals. It’s all about depressing wages!



CEDILLO IS THE LA RAZA (THE RACE) CANDIDATE FOR CONGRESS. LIKE ALL CA POLITICIANS HE HAS POCKETFULS OF  SPECIAL INTEREST MONEY. ANY SPECIAL INTEREST THAT BENEFITS FROM DEPRESSING WAGES BY KEEPING THE FLOODS OF ILLEGALS POURING OVER OUR BORDERS. GRINGOS PAY FOR THE REAL COSTS OF ALL THIS “CHEAP” LABOR.



DIANNE FEINSTEIN, LONG HAS SOLD OUT CA TO ANY SPECIAL INTERESTS THAT PUTS MONEY IN HER BRA, OR DEALS ON HER PIMP-HUSBAND’S TABLE, IS WORKING ALONG WITH HER SECRETARY, BARBARA BOXER, TO GET 1.5 MILLION ILLITERATE AND CRIMINALLY PRONE ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS FOR HER BIG AG BIZ DONORS. NO ONE HAS TOLD THE OLD WHORE FEINSTEIN THAT THERE’S A SERIOUS UNEMPLOYMENT PROBLEM IN MEXIFORNIA!



CALL HENRY WAXMAN’S OFFICE AND ASK HIM ABOUT WHAT HE’S DOING ABOUT THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION AND HE HAS NO IDEA WHAT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT. HIS HANDLERS AND PAYMASTERS ALSO DON’T WANT TO PAY A LIVING WAGE BY HIRING AMERICAN BORN EMPLOYEES!



OBAMA THE HISPANDERER IS NEXT TO IMPOSE AMNESTY RIGHT AFTER HE FINISHES HANDING OVER THE ECONOMY TO WALL STREET AND BIG BANKERS!



*

ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA, AND GIL CEDILLO  are both members of the RACIST MEXICAN SUPREMACIST PARTY OF LA RAZA BENT ON EXPANDING THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE for illegals. They HISPANDER TO GET THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES BY OFFERING MORE WELFARE, GRINGO JOBS, NO ENGLISH HERE, AND FREE DRIVER’S LICENSE, A DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP.

Here’s what CEDILLO AND TACO RUNT VILLARAIGOSA have done for Los Angeles, that is for the ILLEGALS of Lalalando:

1. Characterized by the Christian Science Monitor as Mexican gang capital of America!

2. 1,000 murders yearly by Mexican gangs.

3. Car theft by Mexicans capital of America.

4. ONE BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES PAID OUT TO ILLEGALS.

5. NO enforcement of laws prohibiting the hiring of illegals with stolen social security numbers.

6. $40 million per month paid out to illegals on welfare.

7. Gringos pay for heavy Catholic Mexican breeding. 1 in 5 births. 1 in 10 are illegals the rest of the country.

8. Millions of gringo money spent cleaning up Mexican graffiti!

9. NO ENGLISH spoken here!

10. LA RAZA REGISTERS ILLEGALS TO VOTE ILLEGALLY! Congresswomen Loretta and Linda Sanchez of Mex occupied Orange Country “won” their seats in Congress with the illegal votes of illegals!

Do we really need one more MEXICAN GANG MEMBER IN CONGRESS?

ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA, AND GIL CEDILLO  are both members of the RACIST MEXICAN SUPREMACIST PARTY OF LA RAZA BENT ON EXPANDING THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE for illegals. They HISPANDER TO GET THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES BY OFFERING MORE WELFARE, GRINGO JOBS, NO ENGLISH HERE, AND FREE DRIVER’S LICENSE, A DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP.

*

From the Los Angeles Times

Cedillo reports that his campaign donors bankroll lavish meals, travel and shopping

The congressional candidate said he spent more than $125,000 in the last six years on fine dining, high-end hotels and shopping sprees, expenses he says were 'relevant' to his job as a legislator.

By Michael Finnegan

April 11, 2009

Gil Cedillo, a Los Angeles state senator running for Congress, has spent more than $125,000 gathered from campaign donors over the last six years on shopping excursions, gourmet meals, entertainment and upscale hotels around the globe, public records show.

At Patina, the haute cuisine restaurant at Walt Disney Concert Hall, Cedillo paid $1,203 for dinner. He dropped $289 at Nic's Martini Lounge in Beverly Hills. At the Standard, a downtown hotel known for its hip rooftop bar and swimming pool, Cedillo and his staff spent $5,705 over the course of 26 visits.

In Mumbai, India, Cedillo's stay at the Four Seasons came to $829; his tab at the Bar des Arts in Sao Paulo, Brazil, $229; his hotel and dining charges on a jaunt to Rome and Florence, $1,969.

Cedillo, a former labor leader who made his name fighting to provide driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants, is not the only state lawmaker to tap campaign money for what many would consider lavish meals and travel. He often dines and attends retreats with fellow legislators.

But the scale of Cedillo's spending was on par with that of former Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez, whose worldwide travel and shopping at retailers such as Louis Vuitton in Paris led the state to tighten campaign disclosure rules last summer.

Cedillo's spending, detailed in reports he filed with the secretary of state, contrasts with the frugal record of Judy Chu, his chief rival for the San Gabriel Valley congressional seat. A former Monterey Park assemblywoman elected to the state Board of Equalization in 2006, Chu has spent no campaign money on shopping or entertainment, and less than $5,000 on meals and travel over six years.

The two are vying in a May 19 election to fill the House seat vacated by U.S. Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.

Cedillo's expenses include $7,022 at Nordstrom; $3,483 at Banana Republic; $1,418 at Ann Taylor; $498 at Bloomingdale's; $450 at Crate & Barrel; and $375 at Macy's.

"None of it's for me," Cedillo said in an interview this week at his campaign headquarters in El Monte.

All of the purchases were gifts for staff, legislators and "other people who are important to my campaign and my office," Cedillo said.

The same, he said, goes for the $483 spent at Andrew's Ties in Rome, $132 at the Louvre Museum in Paris and $117 at an unidentified Coach leather outlet.

State law bars candidates from using campaign money for personal expenses. Cedillo said he has always complied with the law, which requires campaign spending to serve "a political, legislative, or governmental purpose." He pointed to a state audit that found one of his committees had substantially complied with disclosure laws from 2003 to 2006, apart from failure to report some donations on time.

"Not one aberration has occurred," he said.

Regardless of legality, the nature of Cedillo's spending is troublesome, said Robert Stern, president of the nonpartisan Center for Governmental Studies and a longtime advocate of campaign finance reform.

"It sounds like he is using campaign funds to supplement his lifestyle," Stern said.

Cedillo collected $116,208 in salary last year and $39,825 in tax-free per diem. The Senate bought a $53,436 black Lexus hybrid for Cedillo; he is charged $280 a month for its use. The state pays for his gas.

But Cedillo has relied on campaign donors to bankroll his shopping and travel, along with hundreds of restaurant meals and tickets for the Rose Bowl, Los Angeles Opera and Clippers basketball games.

Like many lawmakers, Cedillo collected contributions from a host of groups that lobby for favors: labor unions, Indian tribes, and the pharmaceutical, casino, telecommunications, insurance and banking industries, among others. Since 2003, Cedillo has collected $1.2 million, even with no viable election challengers. For the congressional race, he must raise money separately under federal rules that are stricter than the state's.

In California, Cedillo's campaign treasury has covered stays at Casa Madrona Hotel and Spa in Sausalito; the River Terrace Inn in Napa Valley; Portola Hotel and Spa at Monterey Bay; La Costa Resort and Spa in Carlsbad; and the Handlery Hotel and Resort in San Diego.

Cedillo's reports leave unclear how much of his hotel spending was for rooms, and how much for meals. The reports also do not indicate the length of stay. Although staff members incurred some of the expenses, Cedillo spent the great majority, the reports say.

In San Francisco, Cedillo favors boutique hotels in the Union Square and Embarcadero districts. His finance reports say he spent $1,584 at the Monaco, $742 at the Rex, and $543 at the Vitale on the bay-front.

His committees have spent $751 at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel in Marina del Rey and $631 at the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. In both cases, Cedillo said, it was probably for meetings or retreats, not rooms. Travel elsewhere in California, he said, was for meetings of Democratic lawmakers and the state Latino Legislative Caucus, which he chairs.

Cedillo also paid $610 to the Fairmont Kea Lani Hotel on Maui, but said he canceled the trip and was charged nonetheless. He also reported a campaign trip to Las Vegas with multiple aides. They spent $1,269 at the Palazzo casino hotel resort and $1,962 at Harrah's.

As for the trips overseas, Cedillo said he visited India, Taiwan, Italy, Brazil, Argentina, Cuba and Mexico on Senate business. He recalled discussing energy, immigration, population growth, water and climate change with foreign officials. To help manage the world's eighth-largest economy, he said, senators must "go and engage people who have the same or similar circumstances throughout the world."

"All these experiences are relevant to the extent that they enrich my capacity as a legislator," he said.

Lodging at the Four Seasons in Mumbai might not look good to the public, Cedillo said, but aides choose the hotels. That would include the 17th century Sofitel in Florence and the Westin Excelsior near the Spanish Steps in Rome.

All told, Cedillo has spent about $77,000 on restaurants, $29,000 on hotels and $21,000 on airline tickets over six years in the Senate. (That does not include tens of thousands of dollars spent on fundraising events at restaurants, hotels or banquet halls.)

The restaurant charges that Cedillo reported as meetings, office or travel expenses include $424 at Ristorante Buca Mario in Florence; $298 at Ristorante San Francesco in Assisi, Italy; $501 at Emporio da Gula in Foz do Iguacu, Brazil; and in Los Angeles, $964 at Cicada; $559 at La Serenata de Garibaldi; $229 at Blair's; and $1,373 at the Palm.

In the interview, Cedillo recalled that the $1,203 dinner at Patina was with Nuñez and other lawmakers. The $289 visit to Nic's Martini Lounge was for a "meeting" of legislators, he said.

But Cedillo did not recall attending the opera for which his campaign bought tickets. He also could not explain the $176 charge at the Salon Cuvee and Day Spa in Sacramento. "I imagine a gift certificate either for someone from my staff or a friend of the office," he said.

At Ann Taylor, Cedillo said, he bought scarves and sweaters for women on his staff, and at Banana Republic, shirts and ties for men on his staff. Asked to identify who received gifts from Banana Republic, Cedillo named Dan Savage, his chief of staff.

Savage said Cedillo had indeed given him shirts and ties as gifts, but he did not recall any from Banana Republic. He also described his boss as "very into clothes."

...................

LA RAZA, THE POLITICAL PARTY OF THE MEXICAN INVADERS, endorses one of their own: ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA!

ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA, AND GIL CEDILLO  are both members of the RACIST MEXICAN SUPREMACIST PARTY OF LA RAZA BENT ON EXPANDING THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION AND WELFARE STATE for illegals. They HISPANDER TO GET THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES BY OFFERING MORE WELFARE, GRINGO JOBS, NO ENGLISH HERE, AND FREE DRIVER’S LICENSE, A DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP.

The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is not only one of the wealthiest and most politically powerful militant organizations in the country, it is also notoriously racist and subversive. The group's name, "La Raza," means "The Race," by which they are referring to ethnic Mexicans, or more broadly to "hispanics" or "latinos." And it is quite clear from their decades of vitriolic rhetoric — both spoken and written — that the La Raza activists are trying to engender not only race consciousness amongst hispanic U.S. citizens and Mexican migrants, but also racial militancy and animosity toward "Gringo America."

The NCLR grew out of the La Raza Unida (The Race United) Party and the Southwest Council of La Raza in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The key leaders were Marxist-Leninist followers of Fidel Castro and Che Guevarra.

In 1970, the California Senate Fact-Finding Subcommittee on Un-American Activities said this about La Raza Unida: "Its president is Maclovio Barraza. Mr. Barraza has been identified by the Subversive Activities Control Board as a member of the Communist Party, and presides over the Council which recently received a grant of $1,300,000 from the Ford Foundation."

Maclovio Barraza was the NCLR Board of Directors' founding Chairperson, and the NCLR continues to honor this hardcore Marxist by awarding the Moclavio Barraza Award to its top activist each year.

One of the early founders of La Raza was Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, whose violent, extremist rhetoric has caused NCLR some public relations problems. Back in 1969, Gutierrez said: "We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him." He has continued to promote the same hateful "reconquista" ideology ever since. But that didn't stop NCLR from bestowing on him their "Hero Award" in 1994.

The radical student group MEChA (Moviemento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan), with which NCLR has been closely allied for several decades, is even more explicitly and militantly, having adopted the slogan, "Por La Raza Todo, Fuera de La Raza Nada," which translated means: "For the Race, Everything; Outside the Race, Nothing."

MEChA's founding documents and literature are replete with appeals to "La Raza de Bronce" (The Bronze Race) and condemnation of the "brutal gringo." MEChA, as its name suggests, is also a leading promoter of the radical "reconquista" (reconquest) movement, a plan of to take over the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Texas — a region they refer to as "Aztlan" — which they claim was stolen from the "Aztecan" peoples. NCLR provides major financial support to MEChA and many of NCLR's leaders were MEChA leaders in their college days.

NCLR: Agents for the Government of Mexico?

Especially troubling is NCLR's leading role in the Fundacion Solidaridad Mexicano Americana (Foundation for Mexican-American Solidarity, FSMA), an organization founded and funded by the government of Mexico and directed by the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Public Education. Both of these ministries have been engaged in efforts aimed at demanding full political rights for illegal aliens in the U.S. and indoctrinating America's Hispanic population in radical, racist La Raza ideology.

Top members of La Raza, MALDEF, the National Immigration Forum and other leading immigration activist organizations also serve on the Council of the FSMA. As such, they are acting as agents for a foreign power that is actively seeking to influence our national, state, and local laws and policies, in ways that are inimical to the interests of our nation and our citizens. NCLR and these other participating groups should be investigated by Congress to determine if they are breaking any laws, especially since these organizations and/or their affiliates not only enjoy tax-exempt status, but even receive millions of dollars from federal and state government agencies.

*

New Stealth Federal Funding Bill for La Raza

Which brings us to an extraordinary matter of some urgency. Several weeks before the White House and its Senate allies announced their big "breakthrough" legislation (S.1348), radicals in the House quietly introduced legislation to pump $5 million directly into La Raza next year — and $10 million per year for "each fiscal year thereafter."

H. R. 1999, entitled the Hope Fund Act of 2007, should truthfully be labeled the "Perpetual Funding of La Raza Radicals Act."

***************************************************************************** Illegal aliens cost California billions

By Jerry Seper

THE WASHINGTON TIMES Published December 7, 2004 (true figures much bleaker)

Illegal immigration costs the taxpayers of California -- which has the highest number of illegal aliens nationwide -- $10.5 billion a year for education, health care and incarceration, according to a study released yesterday. A key finding of the report by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) said the state's already struggling kindergarten-through-12th-grade education system spends $7.7 billion a year on children of illegal aliens, who constitute 15 percent of the student body. The report also said the incarceration of convicted illegal aliens in state prisons and jails and uncompensated medical outlays for health care provided to illegal aliens each amounted to about $1.4 billion annually. The incarceration costs did not include judicial expenditures or the monetary costs of the crimes committed by illegal aliens that led to their incarceration. "California's addiction to 'cheap' illegal-alien labor is bankrupting the state and posing enormous burdens on the state's shrinking middle-class tax base," said FAIR President Dan Stein. "Most Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much of a drain illegal immigration has become," he said. California is estimated to be home to nearly 3 million illegal aliens. Mr. Stein noted that state and local taxes paid by the unauthorized immigrant population go toward offsetting these costs, but do not match expenses. The total of such payments was estimated in the report to be about $1.6 billion per year. He also said the total cost of illegal immigration to the state's taxpayers would be considerably higher if other cost areas, such as special English instruction, school meal programs or welfare benefits for American workers displaced by illegal-alien workers were added into the equation. Gerardo Gonzalez, director of the National Latino Research Center at California State at San Marcos, which compiles data on Hispanics, was critical of FAIR's report yesterday. He said FAIR's estimates did not measure some of the contributions that illegal aliens make to the state's economy. "Beyond taxes, these workers' production and spending contribute to California's economy, especially the agricultural sector," he said, adding that both legal and illegal aliens are the "backbone" of the state's $28 billion-a-year agricultural industry. In August, a similar study by the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, said U.S. households headed by illegal aliens used $26.3 billion in government services during 2002, but paid $16 billion in taxes, an annual cost to taxpayers of $10 billion. The FAIR report focused on three specific program areas because those were the costs examined by researchers from the Urban Institute in 1994, Mr. Stein said. Looking at the costs of education, health care and incarceration for illegal aliens in 1994, the Urban Institute estimated that California was subsidizing illegal immigrants at about $1.1 billion a year. Mr. Stein said an enormous rise in the costs of illegal immigrants in 10 years is because of the rapid growth of the illegal population. He said it is reasonable to expect those costs to continue to soar if action is not taken to turn the tide. "1994 was the same year that California voters rebelled and overwhelmingly passed Proposition 187, which sought to limit liability for mass illegal immigration," he said. "Since then, state and local governments have blatantly ignored the wishes of the voters and continued to shell out publicly financed benefits on illegal aliens. "Predictably, the costs of illegal immigration have grown geometrically, while the state has spiraled into a fiscal crisis that has brought it near bankruptcy," he said. Mr. Stein said that the state must adopt measures to systematically collect information on illegal-alien use of taxpayer-funded services and on where they are employed, and that policies need to be pursued to hold employers financially accountable.

……..

From the Los Angeles Times

SANDY BANKS


Cedillo's mailer on Pleitez smears a generation


Emanuel Pleitez, 26, a defeated contender for Congress, faced an ugly attack by the opposition, which used his Facebook pictures to tarnish his image.

May 23, 2009

Rookie candidate Emanuel Pleitez was written off early in his unsuccessful race for the 32nd Congressional District seat.

Still, the 26-year-old knocked on voters' doors every day, tapped an online network for donations and fielded a passionate corps of volunteers who didn't mind working 16-hour days, crashing on sofas and surviving on homemade tortas.

That's the upside of being a young candidate: the energy, the idealism, the ability to manipulate giant social networks to spread your message.

The downside is your Facebook page.

With so much on the ballot to consider, Pleitez probably wouldn't have registered a blip on the radar if not for the Facebook flap.

The campaign against him took an ugly turn when opponent Gil Cedillo -- a veteran state senator who also wound up losing -- used photos from Pleitez's Facebook page in attack mailers intended to undercut the candidate's clean-cut image.

One mailer asked in English and Spanish, "Should this man represent you in the House of Representatives or in 'Animal House'?"

The photo underneath featured a group of young people, Pleitez in the rear, his face circled in red.

Like the other two guys, he is smiling and wearing a tie. The young women are wearing skirts, suits, sweaters. Some are mugging playfully for the camera.

All seven of the women are black. And one of them is my oldest daughter.

"You won't believe this," she said one evening last week, carrying her laptop into the kitchen to show me the fliers. "I'm in somebody's campaign ad."

Other snapshots showed Pleitez dancing, hoisting a drink, lounging with a guy in a baseball cap, hugging a procession of young white women.

"Lots of women, hard liquor, dancing on the table and all night partying," the mailer said. ". . . Even nerdy guys want to be cool." "PARTY ANIMAL" had been scrawled across one picture. Other photos showed Pleitez "flashing gang signs," the mailer said.

The ad was supposed to frighten Pleitez supporters into Cedillo's camp, and it did scare off some voters.

But others saw it as a desperate attempt to tarnish not only Pleitez, but also the hard-working young people associated with him.

The "Animal House" photo that includes my daughter was taken at a gathering of Stanford students during their study abroad semester in Santiago, Chile. Some of those young women are now in law school or working on PhDs. Others are teachers, nurses, directors of nonprofit groups. Hardly the stuff of "Girls Gone Wild."

The guy pictured making a V sign with his fingers and wearing a hoodie and baseball cap? A USC student who mentors East Los Angeles youngsters and is "a rising star in the community," Pleitez told me.

"We're throwing up the peace sign," Pleitez said Thursday of their hand signals, frustration evident in a voice still soaked in disappointment from his third-place finish.

"To try to say that I'm romanticizing gangs, to try to make college students look like thugs. . . . They tried to find pictures with white and African American women, and only mailed them to Latino households."

"I expected to be hit at some point," he said, "but I didn't expect it to be as blatant as that."

Millennial Generation meet Geezer Politics.

Cedillo saw nothing wrong with ads "intended to show voters that Mr. Pleitez lacks not only the experience to be a member of Congress, but also the maturity," a campaign statement said.

But young voters lit into the tactic on political blogs, pointing out that the so-called gang sign in one photo is the symbol of Voto Latino, a national voter outreach program.

And the woman pictured making a V with her fingers alongside Pleitez is Rosario Dawson, who starred with Will Smith in "Seven Pounds" last fall. Either Cedillo didn't recognize the popular young Latina or thought she was throwing a gang sign as well.

That made Cedillo look foolish. But it also put young activists on notice.

"This is an embarrassing ad," one poster wrote on the Calitics political blog. "Everyone in the Facebook generation has photos like this. Will every Young Dem that decides to get into politics have to deal with this kind of garbage?"

On Tuesday night, Pleitez's headquarters was packed with dozens of young volunteers. The only party animal I saw was his 58-year-old mother, Isabel Bravo, trying to impose a celebratory mood.

"I am so proud of Emanuel," she told me. And ashamed of the political machine's low-brow efforts to smear her son.

Cedillo ought to be ashamed as well. Pleitez is the kind of role model every neighborhood needs. He grew up in East Los Angeles, the son of an immigrant single mother so poor the family lived in garages and he slept on the floor.

Yet he became a sports star and honor student at Wilson High and earned a scholarship to Stanford, a job at Goldman Sachs and a spot on Barack Obama's transition team. And he is being ridiculed for dancing at parties and having diverse friends?

His volunteers aren't wasting time fretting over the blow. Did they learn a lesson? Maybe. Before you throw your hat in the ring, let Grandma scour your Facebook page.

But they have a lesson to teach as well. Many cut their teeth campaigning for Obama, who was also too young and inexperienced -- not to mention too dark -- according to conventional wisdom not so long ago.

"We're not waiting for someone to pass us the torch of leadership," said George Bahamondes, 22, a USC finance grad who left a job on Wall Street to join Pleitez's campaign. "The era of getting to know the guy so he can tap you on the shoulder when it's your turn is over."

As Bahamondes talked, he looked around at high school students too young to vote "who came every single day to knock on doors" for Pleitez.

"Regardless of what the result is tonight," Bahamondes told me Tuesday, "we've engaged this community in a way they've never seen before."

And there's no going back. So join them, or move over.






KAMALA HARRIS - Calfiornia's LA RAZA SUPREMACIST Attorney General - THE RISE OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA




ARE HORDES OF ARIZONA’S LA RAZA ILLEGALS HEADING TO CA?

LA RAZA EXPANDS THEIR SUPREMACY!

A document submitted by California Attorney General Kamala Harris asks the Court to overturn SB 1070 because it is likely to result in illegal aliens in Arizona moving to other states – like California. In other words, as a far as California is concerned, the problem with SB 1070 is that it works.






*

CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS DECLARES THAT HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!