Monday, January 19, 2015

Senator Dianne Feinstein: America's most corrupt and self-serving


FEINSTEIN AND BOXER HAVE LONG PUSHED FOR AMNESTY. THREE TIMES THESE

CORRUPT LIFER POLS PUSHED FOR A "SPECIAL  AMNESTY" ON BEHALF OF THEIR

BIG AG BIZ DONOR TO GET ANOTHER 1.5 MILLION MEX FARM WORKERS TO JUMP

OUR BORDERS DESPITE THE FACT THAT ONE-THIRD WOULD END UP

ON WELFARE!

Lou Dobbs Tonight Friday, May 16, 2008
 
Some in Congress are once again trying to push piecemeal immigration reform through the back door. Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California attached a farm worker program to the multibillion dollar Iraq war funding bill yesterday which would grant temporary amnesty to 1.3 million farm workers and their families over the next five years.

 
HERE'S FEINSTEIN'S GIFT TO BIG FARM AG DONNERS:
THEY DO SO ON BEHALF OF THEIR GREEDY BIG AG BIZ DONORS!


Jose Herria emigrated illegally from Mexico to Stockton, Calif., in 1997 to work as a fruit
 
picker. He brought with him his wife, Felipa, and three children, 19, 12 and 8 -- all illegals.
 
When Felipa gave birth to her fourth child, daughter Flor, the family had what is referred to
 
as an "anchor baby" -- an American citizen by birth who provided the entire Silverio clan a
 
ticket to remain in the U.S. permanently.
 
 

Most Illegal Immigrant Families Collect Welfare… ALL GET
AMERICAN JOBS???

April 05, 2011

 

Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S.
families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare
programs on behalf of their American-born anchor babies.




KRUGMAN

 

CALIFORNIA – MEXICO’S $28 BILLION DOLLAR WELFARE STATE


 

FEINSTEIN! BOXER! PELOSI! WAXMAN! LOFGREN… ALL LA RAZA SUPREMACIST BUILDING THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN MEXIFORNIA!
 

A WARNING TO LA RAZA HISPANDERING TRAITORS FOR OBAMA’S AMNESTY HOAX:

 


 

SENS. FEINSTEIN and BOXER and NANCY PELOSI VOW TO

BUILD AMERICAN’S BIGGEST GRINGO-PAID “FREE” LA RAZA

ANCHOR BABY FACTORY.



  

Husband's investments entangle Feinstein

 

LATEST FLAP OVER MEDICARE PAYMENT
 
 
DENIALS

 

By David Whitney

 

 
 

WASHINGTON - California lawmakers are questioning 
 
whether an auditing company in which San Francisco
 
investor Richard Blum, the husband of Sen. Dianne
 
Feinstein, has a major financial stake is rejecting Medicare
 
claims at California rehabilitation hospitals in order to reap
 
millions of dollars in profits at the expense of patient care.

 
The company, PRG-Schultz International, has a contract with the Centers for Medicare and

Medicaid Services, the overseer of the Medicare program, to check payments in California

for mistakes. Its only pay is a bounty of up to 30 percent on the "overcharges" it identifies.

 

HER NAME IS SYNONYMOUS WITH CORRUPTION AND SELF-ENRICHMENT OFF ELECTED OFFICE.

OBAMA DONOR AND BUSH WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN IS ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.

 
Sen. Feinstein's Husband Cashes In on Crisis (ethical? You decide)


By Washington Times

Published April 21, 2009

FoxNews.com

On the day the new Congress convened this year, Sen. Dianne
 
Feinstein introduced legislation to route $25 billion in taxpayer
 
money to a government agency that had just awarded her husband's
 
real estate firm a lucrative contract to sell foreclosed properties at
 
compensation rates higher than the industry norms, the Washington
 
Times reported on Tuesday.



 

RALPH NADER CHARACTERIZES FEINSTEIN AS A “CLOSET REPUBLICAN” BUT WASN’T OBAMA BUSH’S THIRD AND FOURTH TERMS AS WELL?

 
LIKE THE CLINTONS, THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY, and the OBAMANATION, FEINSTEIN LOVES THE SMELL OF MONEY OFF ELECTED OFFICE.
 

YOU DON’T GET ANY MORE CORRUPT THAN THIS OLD WHORE!



  
(Some ethics analysts question whether Mrs. Feinstein ran afoul of the latter provision, creating the appearance that she was rewarding the agency that had just hired her husband's firm.)

Richard C. Blum and Dianne Feinstein: The Power Couple of California LOOTING AMERICA FROM TOP TO BOTTOM!

"They remain at the pinnacle of power today, he as a billionaire

financier, speculator, real estate executive and deal maker; she as the

senior Senator (California's highest federal official), from the largest

and most powerful state in the United States. They exemplify power

as it is now wielded in the higher circles of the class system of the

U.S. today, and illustrate well the dismal results of this system. This

system is best characterized as a plutocratic kleptocracy, completely

lacking in authentic democracy, operated by and for corporate

racketeers, in short, a dictatorship of big capital, the top 1% of wealth

holders, which makes up a ruling class."




THE STAGGERING CORRUPTION OF ONE OF AMERICA’S
MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS!


Dianne Feinstein, has a major financial stake
is rejecting Medicare claims at California
rehabilitation hospitals in order to reap
millions of dollars in profits at the expense of
patient care.


ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN WORKER - Hillary Clinton's Walmart connection fueling Left's doubts | WashingtonExaminer.com

Clinton's Walmart connection fueling Left's doubts | WashingtonExaminer.com

THERE'S  NO ONE THAT WILL WORK HARDER FOR THE 1% AND CONTINUE THE OBAMA ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN WORKER THAN BANKSTER-BOUGHT HILLARY CLINTON!


THE “HOPE and CHANGE” CLOWN BARACK OBAMA LEAD THE NATION INTO MASSIVE BAILOUTS FOR CRONY BANKSTERS, MILLIONS OF JOBS FOR ILLEGALS, BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS AND A NATIONAL DEBT GREATER THAN ALL THE PRESIDENTS PUT TOGETHER.  THERE WAS NO CHANGE FROM BUSH. OBAMA SIMPLY IS BUSH’S THIRD AND FOURTH TERMS ON STEROIDS.


 

MITT ROMNEY:

“Under President Obama the rich have gotten richer, income inequality has gotten worse and there are more people in poverty in American than ever before,” Mr. Romney said, according to The New York Times.

Romney laid out three pillars for a potential new campaign, according to the Associated Press, which would focus on national security, providing more opportunity to the middle class, and “breaking the scourge of poverty.”

"It's a tragedy, a human tragedy, that the middle class in this country by and large doesn't believe that the future will be better than the past."


WALMART’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE – IS THE DEMOCRAT

PARTY A SERVANT OF THIS PARASITIC COMPANY?

Walmart, the multi-billion-dollar international retail conglomerate infamous for low wages, poor working conditions, and illegal labor practices, is the largest private employer in the United States and Mexico, employing 1.4 million in the US, and 2.2 million worldwide, at more than 11,000 locations. Last quarter, the company reported revenue of $469.16 billion.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/12/walmart-fucking-over-america-union.html
While the issue of the extreme exploitation of Walmart and other service workers is very real, the campaign organized by the unions was a stunt aimed at bolstering their own credibility and promoting the Democratic Party, which is overseeing a coordinated assault on the working class.
“The American political system is not a democracy; it is a plutocracy—a government of, by and for the rich. The financial aristocracy of bankers and financial parasites runs the country by means of the CIA, the military and a thoroughly bribed retinue of politicians from the White House and Congress down to City Hall.”

Obama’s State of Delusion

22 January 2015
The delusional character of Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday—presenting an America of rising living standards and a booming economy, capped by his declaration that the “shadow of crisis has passed”—is perhaps matched only in its presentation by the media and supporters of the Democratic Party.

The general tone was set by the New York Times in its lead editorial on Wednesday, which described the speech as a “simple, dramatic message about economic fairness, about the fact that the well-off—the top earners, the big banks, Silicon Valley—have done just great, while middle and working classes remain dead in the water.”

The attempt to present Obama’s remarks as a clarion call to combat social inequality runs first of all into the inconvenient fact that the individual supposedly making this call has been the head of state for the past six years. The Times writes as if the policies of the Obama administration—the multitrillion-dollar bailout for the banks, the coordinated assault on wages, relentless cuts to social programs and the social counterrevolution in health care known as Obamacare—have nothing to do with the record levels of social inequality that prevail in the United States.

The Times quotes Obama’s question delivered toward the beginning of the speech: “Will we accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well? Or will we commit ourselves to an
economy that generates rising incomes and chances for everyone who makes an effort?”

Anyone listening to the speech with even a passing knowledge of the record of his presidency would immediately respond that, for Obama and for the entire political establishment that he heads, the answer is clearly the former.

As for the proposals themselves—including tuition assistance for community colleges, tax credits for child care and college education, an increase in the minimum wage and paid maternity leave—they consist of insincere and paltry measures, tailored to the interests of big business, that no one, least of all Obama, expects will pass.

The Times itself acknowledges, “Mr. Obama knows his prospects of getting Congress to agree are less than zero.” White House officials freely admitted ahead of the State of the Union that Obama had no expectations that the measures he proposed would be taken up on Capitol Hill. “We will not be limited by what will pass this Congress, because that would be a very boring two years,” White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer told the press before the speech.

Previous State of the Union speeches have produced similar wish lists aimed at generating illusions that Obama sought to advance a “progressive” agenda, proposals dropped as soon as the president completed the obligatory tour of photo-ops and speeches at college campuses.

In his 2014 State of the Union, Obama called for ending tax loopholes for corporations that ship jobs overseas, investing tens of billions in infrastructure projects to create jobs, making pre-kindergarten available to every four-year-old child, regardless of family income, and enacting equal pay for women. Instead, one million people were cut off food stamps, long-term unemployment remained stubbornly high, poverty increased, and wages stagnated.

On the other hand, every major initiative by Obama in domestic policy—the 2009 stimulus program, the 2010 health care reform legislation, the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul, countless budget deals with the congressional Republicans, right up to the executive order on immigration issued a month ago—was dictated by the needs of corporate America, and, in many cases, drafted by corporate lobbyists.

The consequences for working people—record long-term unemployment, a tidal wave of home foreclosures, the slashing of wages in basic industry, the steady decline in living standards over all—were not accidental. They were the deliberate goal of government policy, for both Democrats and Republicans, because mass suffering by the working class was required to obtain the resources needed to bail out the financial aristocracy.

The main purpose of Obama’s remarks was to give the various publications and organizations that orbit the Democratic Party—the Times, the Nation magazine (whose columnist John Nichols described the spech as a “serious effort to address income inequality”), the trade unions, and the network of pseudo-left organizations that present themselves as “socialist”—fodder for promoting the Democrats in the 2016 elections.

Thus, Obama’s speech was peppered with references aimed at the upper-middle class practitioners of various forms of identity politics (Time magazine, for example, enthused that Obama “made history Tuesday night” by the inclusion in his speech of one word: “transgender”).

Here is how to paint the Democratic Party in progressive colors, he was telling them. Here is how the Democratic Party will seek to fool the American people as it collaborates with the Republicans in enacting ever more right-wing policies over the next two years, combined with endless war abroad and the assault on democratic rights.

The delusions, self-delusions and lies of Obama and his supporters cannot, however, alter the underlying reality of American political life: the unbridgeable gulf between the entire state apparatus and the vast majority of the population. It is notable that Obama’s speech, delivered less than three months after the midterm elections, made no reference to the debacle that the Democratic Party suffered at the polls—due primarily to the collapse in voter turnout produced by six years of right-wing policies from the “candidate of change.”

Perhaps the most striking delusion of all is the belief by the ruling class and its representatives that it can, through a few honeyed and lying phrases, forestall the tidal wave of social opposition that is on the horizon.

Patrick Martin and Joseph Kishore