Nafta Joe Biden has always been for open borders. It is not by accident the borders are undefended even as U.S. squanders trillions defending the borders of dictators, it is a device for more 'cheap' labor. Putting employers of illegals in prison built along the open Narcomex border would end the invasion that day.
could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the
Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the
American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help
citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than
fail to enforce immigration laws." REP. LAMAR SMITH
Makes Secret Deal With Mexico
Obama Administration Makes
Secret Deal With Mexico - Mexican Consulates are headquarters for the MEXICAN
FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA with the agenda of expanding the Mexican welfares
state with cooperation of Barack Obama and the Democrat party.
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
The danger, as Washington Post economics columnist
Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing poverty” in the form of a new
underclass—a permanent group of working poor.
POVERTY IN FLORIDA, CUTS IN BENEFITS AS REPUBLICANS BARACK
OBAMA and MARCO RUBIO PUSH FOR MORE JOBS FOR MORE ILLEGALS…. THE LOOTING OF THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BY WALL STREET and MEXICO CONTINUES AT TOP SPEED UNDER
OBAMA’S REGIME OF CORRUPTION!
“She will continue
the pattern of lawlessness perpetuated by thepresident and the
political leadership at the Department of Homeland Security,” Sen. Jeff
Sessions (R-Ala.) said. Congress cannot and must not confirm anyone to lead an
agency in DHS or other law enforcement agency who supports executive amnesty.”
THE ISIS INVASION
which cuts off more heads? The LA RAZA Mexican drug cartels that mow over our
borders or ISIS way the hell over there???
“The exact location where the
terrorist group has established its base is around eight miles from the U.S.
border in an area known as “Anapra” situated just west of Ciudad Juárez in the
Mexican state of Chihuahua. Another ISIS cell to the west of Ciudad Juárez, in
Puerto Palomas, targets the New Mexico towns of Columbus and Deming for easy
access to the United States, the same knowledgeable sources confirm.”
Law enforcement and intelligence sources report the area
around Anapra is dominated by the Vicente Carrillo Fuentes Cartel (“Juárez
Cartel”), La Línea (the enforcement arm of the cartel) and the Barrio Azteca (a
gang originally formed in the jails of El Paso). Cartel control of the Anapra
area make it an extremely dangerous and hostile operating environment for
Mexican Army and Federal Police operations.
THE ASSAULT on the
AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS by the DEMOCRAT PARTY:
“By large margins, even in opinion
polls conducted by the corporate-controlled media, the American people support
sharp increases in taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs and provide
jobs for the unemployed; they oppose cuts in Social Security and Medicare and
view education, health care and other public services as basic rights; they
oppose government spying on the telephone and Internet usage of ordinary
Americans, as well as other police-state measures; and they oppose overseas
military interventions in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The Democratic and Republican presidential candidates stand on the other
side of the barricades on all these issues.”
Pelosi echoed Boehner’s comments, declaring that it had been
a “privilege” to work with the House leader, and that she hoped the agreement
“will be a model of things to come.”… THEY MEAN OBOMANOMICS: STEAL FROM THE
MIDDLE-CASS and BUILD THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE ON OUR BACKS!
THE OBAMA REGIME’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN
BORN WORKER RATCHETED UP ONCE AGAIN!
A historic attack on Medicare
17 April 2015
US President Barack Obama signed into law on Thursday the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, marking a new stage in the bipartisan assault on the government health insurance program for 53 million American seniors and the disabled.
The bill, HR 2, was passed this week by the Senate, following approval by the House last month—in both cases by overwhelming bipartisan majorities.
Obama praised the bill as a “milestone,” after the Senate vote Tuesday. On Thursday, he praised the “bipartisan achievement,” saying that it would “be good for people who use Medicare, it’s going to be good for our seniors.”
In fact, the bill expands means testing for Medicare and establishes a new payment system in which doctors will be rewarded for cutting costs while being punished for the volume and frequency of the health care services they provide.
The press has depicted the bill as a miracle of bipartisanship, demonstrating that Democrats and Republicans can work together to end Washington “gridlock” in the interest of the public good. The reality is that the bill is ultimately aimed at gutting health care services for the millions of seniors who rely upon it.
News reports have focused on the “doc fix” contained in the legislation, which establishes a new payment schedule for doctors in place of a formula that since 1997 has tied doctor payments to economic growth, the sustainable growth rate, or SGR. The bill’s passage averts a 21 percent payment cut that would have gone into effect April 1, and provides modest increases in doctor payments through 2019.
Beginning in 2019, however, doctors will qualify for bigger reimbursements if they participate in one of two programs in which they will be paid, according to Obama, based on a “payment model that rewards quality of care instead of quantity of care.” Reference to “quality of care” is a political fraud. Doctors will have a financial incentive to withhold more expensive tests and services, and will be rewarded for rationing care and cutting costs.
The bipartisan backing for the Medicare bill is based on common agreement on one basic issue: Medicare spending must be slashed and a radical shift needs to be instituted in the program—away from the “lavish” fee-for-service system, while transforming Medicare into a poverty program in which the vast majority of beneficiaries receive barebones coverage.
An examination of the bill’s backers provides insight into its reactionary nature. Its chief House sponsor was Representative Michael Burgess, a right-wing Tea Party politician from Texas. Republican House speaker John Boehner, who crafted the bill alongside Democratic House leader Nancy Pelosi, described HR 2 as “The first real entitlement reform we’ve seen in nearly two decades”—a reference to Welfare “reform” passed in 1996 under the Clinton administration.
Representative Paul Ryan (Republican of Wisconsin), a presidential hopeful who has called for privatizing Medicare by replacing it with a voucher system, wrote in an op-ed piece calling for passage of the bill, “Medicare is going broke… that’s why we need these structural reforms.”
And in an article in the right-wing National Review headlined “A Medicare Bill Conservatives Need to Embrace,” Ryan Ellis wrote, “We can very reasonably anticipate a future where my daughter—who will turn 65 in November of 2078—will be a then-typical senior who pays for most of her own Medicare benefit. That will be largely thanks to HR 2…”
The current Medicare “reform” is in line with Obama’s signature domestic initiative, the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Under the ACA’s “individual mandate,” individuals and families without health coverage from their employer or a government program such as Medicare or Medicaid are required to purchase coverage from private insurance companies. There is minimal oversight on what these insurers can charge their captive pool of customers, and many policies carry deductibles and out-of-pocket costs upwards of $5,000 annually.
Obamacare was presented as legislation that would provide near-universal, high-quality health care to millions of Americans. Since its passage into law in 2010, the ACA has been exposed as a boondoggle for the health care industry that has forced millions of people to sign up for overpriced, substandard coverage. Those who remain uninsured have been slapped with tax penalties, while others who did sign up have faced rising premiums and collection calls from the government to pay up.
The New York Times, a fervent supporter of the legislation popularly known as Obamacare, has also campaigned relentlessly for reining in spending on “unnecessary” tests and procedures, particularly for Medicare recipients. Services targeted by the Times include mammograms and breast exams, heart stents, cholesterol drugs and prostate screenings, to name just a few.
Stated simply, the Obama administration and its “liberal” supporters, along with the overwhelming majority of the politicians in the two big-business parties, feel that drastic measures are required to counteract what they perceive as an unpleasant reality: seniors are living too long into retirement and sucking up health care resources.
To reverse this trend, measures being instituted through Obamacare and the new Medicare bill will result in reduced medical care, needless suffering and untimely deaths.
The new Medicare bill has been largely hatched as a conspiracy behind the backs of the American people. There were no Congressional hearings or public debate on the sweeping measures contained in the legislation.
The White House and politicians in Congress are well aware that Medicare and Social Security, the government retirement program, are widely popular and that moves to attack or privatize them will be met with suspicion and opposition. Hence their duplicity in pushing through their “reforms.”
The gutting of Medicare is part of an assault on health care that affects the working class and considerable sections of middle-income families. Obamacare is also having the effect of dismantling employer-provided health care for active workers and retirees, the system that for seven decades has traditionally provided health coverage for most US workers.
The drive to slash Medicare spending and ultimately dismantle it is part of a broader strategy of the ruling elite, which seeks to boost its wealth and profits by clawing back the living standards and gains won by the working class in decades of struggle. These include not only Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, but public education, the right to decent and affordable housing, and the right to culture.
A solution to the health care crisis cannot be left in the hands of the ruling elite and its political representatives. Medical care must be taken out of the hands of the for-profit health care industry and placed on socialist foundations, guaranteeing free, high-quality health care for all through the establishment of a democratically run, publicly owned socialized health care system.
STAGGERING COST OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S AGENDA OF BUILDING THE LA RAZA MEXICAN
WELFARE STATE on the BACKS OF AMERICA’S LOOTED MIDDLE-CLASS:
“The lifetime costs of Social Security
and Medicare benefits of illegal immigrant beneficiaries of President Obama’s
executive amnesty would be well over a trillion dollars, according to Heritage
Foundation expert Robert Rector’s prepared testimony for a House panel obtained
in advance by Breitbart News.”
SECURITY to VOTING ILLEGALS: The Obama – LA RAZA Conspiracy:
MEXICANS ALREADY GET BILLIONS IN WELFARE AND
OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders!
“What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying.You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
DID OBAMA PUNK AMERICANS AS BADLY AS
IT LOOKS NOW? OR DID WE SIMPLY NOT SEE THE “CHANGE” AS HIS WALL STREET LOOTERS
AND PAYMASTERS RAN OFF WITH IT???