TYSON HAS LONG BEEN IDENTIFED WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
Tyson Foods Faces Boycott After Firing 1,200 Americans, ‘Would Like to Employ’ 42,000 Migrants - AND BIDEN - MAYORKAS - SCHUMER HAVE USHERED OVER THE BORDER 15 MILLION TO PICK FROM.
Do you
still remember when American business did not operate on the basis of hook,
crook, and steal, but had to provide an honest service or product for an honest
price?
BUT
NOW IT’S ALL RIGGED!
Rigged to
steal money from people.
It’s
really a simple paradigm they all use, and it follows that of the banksters who
have stollen trillions of dollars from the American economy. The five biggest
banksters alone suck out of us more than $5 billion per year on account
‘overdraft’ charges which they’ve rigged to make massively profitable. There is
no real cost to rejecting a check NFS. Yet the banks suck off $35-$45 dollars
each for this cash cow.
Banks,
and virtually all businesses use deceptive means to lure consumers into their
web. They offer all kinds of perks to come their way, most, if not all, are
fraudulent, grossly exaggerated, or simply withdrawn once you connected your
bank account with the parasite operation.
The
American middle class didn’t die of natural causes. We were plundered and
looted by the special interests who suck the blood out of this nation, buy the
filthy politicians to enable and abet their crime waves.
DAN
RIFKIN IS THE CONSUMMATE LOAN SHARKER CON MAN. He operates on a very
simply and entirely parasitic paradigm to suck the blood out of consumers.
First, he
offers you next to nothing for your valuable objects, such as your Cartier
watches.
He
charges blood sucking interest rates and other fees that are obscene in their
greed. This is one greed fucker who has probably done nothing in his entire
life other than parasite off people.
Once you
have repaid the amount borrowed and then some, Rifkin hooks and crooks to steal
your property.
Business
is booming for the BEVERLY HILLS LOAN sharkers. So good they built a special
elevator up the side of the building for their victims.
We can even hear it today from Mexican nationals and their
descendants in the U.S. who glorify La Raza at the expense of their adopted
country.
Mexican
Invasion
By
Tom Barrett
At
the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also through Canada)
the United States will be completely over run with illegal aliens by the year
2025. I’m not
talking about legal immigrants who follow US law to become citizens. In less
than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion, ILLEGAL aliens and their
offspring will be the dominant population in the United States. According to US
Border Control (see LINK below). “They will have made such inroads into the
political and social systems that they will have more influence than our
Constitution over how the U.S. is governed. The ugly consequence of an ignored
U.S. Constitution is already taking place.” The millions upon millions of
illegal aliens streaming into the US are the foundation for what could be
another attempt at secession by several US states. Many of them will use
ill-conceived programs that reward illegal immigration to become US citizens. Other
illegals will simply go to the polls and vote without taking the trouble to
apply for citizenship.Together, these groups could form a voting block
that could tear our nation apart. Those of you who read the email version
of this column should go to www.ConservativeTruth.org
to see the map posted there. It shows the borders of a new nation
proposed by influential Mexican nationals and Hispanic US Citizens. (See LINK
below: Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'.) It includes six northern states
of Mexican, as well as Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, and southern
Colorado. The idea of a Hispanic Homeland could be ignored as the pipedream
of crackpots if a substantial majority of Mexican citizens did not support it.
A Zogby poll of Mexicans done in June 2002 revealed that a substantial majority
of Mexican citizens believe that southwestern America properly belongs to
Mexico. They said that Mexicans do not need the permission of the U.S. to enter
this territory. 58 percent of Mexican citizens agreed with this statement: "The
territory of the United States' southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico."
Only 28 percent disagreed with the statement. Listen to what some Mexican
government officials and US leaders (including politicians and Professors at
taxpayer-funded Universities) have to say on this subject. Jose Angel
Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas, Arlington and founder of La Raza
Unida political party screams at rallies: "We have an aging white America.
They are dying. They are ******** in their pants with fear! I love it! We have
got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to
the worst, we have got to kill him!" (See LINK below.) Richard Alatorre,
Los Angeles City Council "They’re afraid we’re going to take over the
governmental institutions and other institutions. They’re right. We will take
them over. Mario Obledo, California State Secretary of Health, Education and
Welfare under Jerry Brown, who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by
Bill Clinton, says, “California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who
doesn’t like it should leave." Proposition 187 was the California
initiative supported by a majority of Californians that denied taxpayer funds
for services to non-citizens. Speaking at a Latino gathering in response to
Proposition 187’s passage in 1995, Art Torres, the Chairman of the California
Democratic Party, said: "Power is not given to you. You have to take it.
Remember, 187 is the last gasp of white America in California." The
national newspaper of Mexico, Excelsior: "The American Southwest seems
to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single
shot." Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor: "We are
politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens
of this country...I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I’m
going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back." Jose
Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General: “We are practicing ‘La Reconquista’ in
California." "Reconquista" means the reconquest of the US
southwest by Mexico. (See LINK below.). These people are serious! They think
they are going to take US territory. The Mexican President declared it here in
our country, and Bill Clinton signed a Presidential Executive Order that paves
the way for at least part of Mexico’s dream. Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo
said in Chicago on July 23, 1997, "I have proudly affirmed that the
Mexican nation extends beyond the territory enclosed by its borders and that
Mexican migrants are an important – a very important – part of this. For this
reason, my government proposed a constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican
with the right and the desire to acquire another nationality to do so without
being forced to first give up his or her Mexican nationality."
Translation: It is next to impossible to receive Mexican citizenship unless you
can prove you are of Mexican descent. But Mexico knows that the US has soft
immigration laws and will grant citizenship to almost anyone. (After all, we
grant citizenship every day to immigrants from countries who have sworn to
destroy us.) So Mexico wants to take advantage of this ridiculous situation by
encouraging their citizens to apply for US citizenship while keeping Mexican
citizenship. That way the Mexican government can influence the political
process here in the US. Executive Order 13122, signed on May 25, 1999, by the
most treasonous president this nation has ever been cursed with, Bill Clinton,
established an Interagency Task Force on the Economic Development of the
Southwest Border. Part of the Order reads, "The Southwest Border or
Southwest Border region is defined as including the areas up to 150 miles north
of the United States-Mexican border in the States of Arizona, New Mexico,
Texas, and California." According to experts on international law, this
sets the stage for a 150-mile-wide “Border Zone” that will neither belong to
Mexico or the US. This could then become the first area of a Hispanic Nation
that would eventually encompass the areas shown in the map of the proposed
Republica del Norte (The Northern Republic). Our government, pushed by liberal
Democrats, has been systematically laying the groundwork for such a breakaway
republic. Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non European
countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and
government contracts? It’s called affirmative action or racial privilege. Some
time ago a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was
defeated. Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to
maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They
were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly
stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is
good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants. Mexico, a
nation that has benefited enormously from American generosity is now working to
destabilize our country. Is “destabilize” too strong a word? I don’t think so. Whether
or not Mexican leaders think they can actually create enough hatred against
“gringos” to accomplish the creation of a new republic made up of mainly US
territory, they know that pushing that agenda will cause huge political
problems here and allow Mexico to accomplish many of their goals. Is the
government of Mexico behind this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President
and a Mexican Consul General in support of it. They have everything to gain and
little to lose by pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal
immigration, which destabilizes our economy. The US Border Control website
(see LINK below) shows an illustration from a Mexican government publication
showing their citizens how to best illegally enter the US. Why? It takes the
strain of taking care of unemployed Mexicans off the Mexican treasury and puts
it on the US treasury. And when the illegals get on welfare, they send some of
their money home, which helps the Mexican economy. All this talk by Mexican and
US officials about the US illegally occupying Mexican territory does nothing
but breed racial hatred. The sad thing is that none of this is about race. It
is about the things that all wars and conflicts are about: Greed, power and
money. I don’t like to talk about a problem without offering a solution. The US
politicians and professors who advocate taking US territory are guilty of
sedition. Remove them from their offices and (hopefully) put them in a federal
penitentiary where they can consider the error of their ways. The Mexican
politicians who do the same are guilty of inciting sedition. This is very close
to an act of war. Immediately cut of all economic aid to Mexico until its
government publicly disavows this lunatic plan. Finally, we must realize that
we can’t stop this by marching US troops into Mexico. We should use troops to
guard our borders, because the US Border Patrol cannot cover the huge US-Mexico
border without help. And we need to use pass laws that will stop the government
from rewarding illegal immigrants at the expense of those who follow the law.
We have a huge immigration problem in this country. This ridiculous Hispanic
Homeland idea is just a symptom of the problem. INTERNET RESEARCH: Professor
Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland' 1. http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm
Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A University of New Mexico Chicano Studies professor
predicts a new, sovereign Hispanic nation within the century, taking in the
Southwest and several northern states of Mexico. Charles Truxillo suggests the
“Republica del Norte,” the Republic of the North, is “an inevitability.” He
envisions it encompassing all of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and
southern Colorado, plus the northern tier of Mexican states: Baja California,
Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas. Along both sides of the
U.S.-Mexico border “there is a growing fusion, a reviving of connections,”
Truxillo said. “Southwest Chicanos and Norteño Mexicanos are becoming one
people again.” Truxillo, 47, has said the new country should be brought into
being “by any means necessary,” but recently said it was unlikely to be formed
by civil war. Instead, its creation will be accomplished by the electoral pressure
of the future majority Hispanic population in the region, he said.
Over
the last year, I've posted here that many of my friends in Mexico were shocked
with their country's tolerance of illegal immigration.
In
other words, the Mexico that I remember was brutal, and I mean brutal, with
anyone crossing its southern border.
Often,
Central Americans have pointed out that they were scared to death crossing
Mexico. I recall a young woman who said she and her friends were
sure that they'd be raped crossing Mexico. Thankfully, this group of
young women were not, but their fears were legitimate.
More than 6 in 10 Mexicans say migrants are a
burden on their country because they take jobs and benefits that should belong
to Mexicans.
A 55 percent majority supports deporting migrants
who travel through Mexico to reach the United States.
Those findings defy the perception that Mexico —
a country that has sent millions of its own migrants to the United States,
sending billions of dollars in remittances — is sympathetic to the surge of
Central Americans.
Instead, the data suggests Mexicans have turned
against the migrants transiting through their own country, expressing antipathy
that would be familiar to many supporters of President Trump north of the
border.
Who
knew that MAGA is now MMGA, or Make Mexico Great Again?
The
results of this poll are not surprising to any of us who know the
country. In my case, I worked with a U.S. company in Mexico City
years ago.
Mexicans
have often told me they need to send their people north, and Central Americans
would only compete with them up there. It's sort of as if it's okay
for us and not for them!
So
here we are. After a few caravans, Central Americans are seeing the
Mexico that we've known all these years.
A group of
Central American migrants being held in a Mexican immigration detention center
in Mexicali began rioting Wednesday afternoon, requiring the deployment of
police and troops.
A group of 23 migrants pending deportation, primarily back to
Honduras, began a riot on Wednesday by burning a mattress and causing damage to
bathrooms, according to local reporting. Responding
municipal fire personnel were unable to enter the facility because they were
met with resistance by the migrants who began throwing objects and liquids
while shouting they were members of “Los Maras.” The label is commonly used to
identify the violent transnational criminal gang, the MS-13.
Due to the violent behavior, state cops and elements of the
Mexican Army were deployed. The center was eventually brought under control
when riot police forcefully entered with stun grenades, according to confidential
law enforcement sources.
Many of the Central Americans were dealing with drug addiction
problems according to Ranulfo Figueroa, head of the regional office of the
Mexican immigration agency. Breitbart sources said the migrants were protesting
their forthcoming deportations. It is unknown if they were part of the original
migrant caravan that began to arrive in the region in mid-November. Migrants in
this center were taken into custody in Mexicali after not qualifying to stay in
a shelter due to drug use or other criminal factors.
Breitbart News reports extensively on the estimated 7,000 to
9,000-plus migrant caravan, which began in Honduras on October 12, 2018, and
traveled through Guatemala to the United States border with Mexico. On November
14, nearly 400 migrants in eight
buses were filmed traveling through the northern border state of Sonora,
escorted by Mexican federal and state police. Approximately a day
later, another 900 Central Americans in 22 buses passed through Sonora. Many in the migrant caravan stayed
in Mexicali after the shelters of Tijuana were filled to capacity. Secondary
camps were set up for those waiting to make an asylum request
with U.S. Department of State. Mexicali is approximately 110 miles
east of Tijuana.
Robert Arce is a retired Phoenix Police detective with extensive
experience working Mexican organized crime and street gangs. Arce has worked in
the Balkans, Iraq, Haiti, and recently completed a three-year assignment in
Monterrey, Mexico, working out of the Consulate for the United States
Department of State, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Program, where
he was the Regional Program Manager for Northeast Mexico (Coahuila, Tamaulipas,
Nuevo Leon, Durango, San Luis Potosi, Zacatecas.) You can follow him on Twitter. He can be reached at robertrarce@gmail.com
BORDER AGENT RESCUES
DROWNING MIGRANT INVADERS…. Mexico ships them back over the border to register
Democrat and collect their anchor baby welfare!
"The
newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election
when he told his compadres they should all move to America,
illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies
will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN
FLAHERTY
*
"They will destroy America
from within. The leftist billionaires
who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in
Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion. They have nothing
but contempt for us who must endure the consequences of our communities being
intruded upon by gangs, drug dealers and human traffickers. These people have no intention of becoming
Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for
us." PATRICIA McCARTHY
*
The immigration debate
has been raging for years. Advocates for open borders can be
found on both sides of the political aisle and in a wide variety of special
interest groups who have come to see the immigration system that delivers an
unlimited supply of cheap and exploitable labor, an unlimited supply of foreign
tourists, and unlimited supply of foreign students and, for the lawyers, an
unlimited supply of clients. MICHAEL CUTLER
bUT DOES FOX
BELONG TO THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS?
"Also, Rubin did not mention the moral
responsibility of the child’s father who brought her through the desert in an
apparent effort to use the catch-and-release Flores loophole
to get past border guards. The loophole was created by Judge Dolly Gee who has
ordered border officials to release migrants after 20 days if they bring a
child with them."
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign
visitors and immigrants are:
1.) in the country legally;
2.) have the means to sustain themselves economically;
3.) not destined to be burdens on society;
4.)of economic and social benefit to society;
5.) of good character and have no criminal records; and
6.)contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures that:
7.)immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
8.)foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
9.)foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s
internal politics;
10.)foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or
deported;
11.)foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned
or deported;
12.)those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
(LA RAZA, DEM INVASION)
THE CONSPIRACY TO
SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY
The Democrat Party’s secret agenda for wider open borders,
more welfare for invading illegals, more jobs and free anything they illegally
vote for…. All to destroy the two-party system and build the GLOBALISTS’
DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
Demonstrably and irrefutably the Democrat Party became the party whose principle objective is
to thoroughly transform the nature of the American electorate by means of open
borders and the mass, unchecked importation of illiterate third world peasants
who will vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats and their La Raza welfare
state. FRONTPAGE MAG
THE NARCOMEX INVASION OF AMERICA…. By
invitation of the Democrat Party
HOW MANY HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS WILL WE LET
MEXICO SUCK OUT OF OUR OPEN BORDERS?
There are many reasons
why, for the first time, the government of Mexico would agree to work
cooperatively with the United States over an extremely serious
immigration-related issue. It is likely, of course that President Trump was not
just posturing when he said he would cut off aid to Mexico and other countries
who permit the United States to be invaded by illegal aliens.
*
Under Guzman’s leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel became the largest
drug trafficking organization in the world with influence in every major U.S.
city.
*
The allegations against Pena Nieto are
not new. In 2016, Breitbart
News reported on an investigation by Mexican journalists
which revealed how Juarez Cartel operators funneled money into the
2012 presidential campaign. The investigation was carried out by Mexican
award-winning journalist Carmen
Aristegui and
her team….The subsequent scandal became known as “Monexgate” for the cash
cards that were given out during Peña Nieto’s campaign. The allegations
against Pena Nieto went largely unreported by U.S. news outlets.
“The radicals seek nothing less than secession from
the United States whether to form their own sovereign state or to reunify with
Mexico. Those who desire reunification with Mexico are irredentists who seek to
reclaim Mexico's "lost" territories in the American Southwest.” Maria
Hsia Chang Professor of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
*
"Mexican president
candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador called for mass immigration to the United
States, declaring it a "human right". We will defend all the
(Mexican) invaders in the American," Obrador said, adding that immigrants
"must leave their towns and find a life, job, welfare, and free medical in
the United States."
"Fox’s
Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed ranting
AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net,
and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
COST to AMERICANS
of the LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION in CALIFORNIA ALONE: $2,370 per legal.
"Most
Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services
deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on
their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much
of a drain illegal immigration has become." FAIR President Dan Stein.
Californians
bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population
estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and
local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total
amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S.
citizen.
*
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S WAR ON
AMERICA’S LEGAL WORKERS, BORDERS AND LAWS as they build the LA RAZA welfare
state on our backs.
* One in every eleven persons born
in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported
that in 2014 $1.87
billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds
of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for
the AMERICAN THINKER.COM
"Chairman of the DNC Keith
Ellison was even spotted wearing a
shirt stating, "I don't believe in borders" written in Spanish.
According to a new CBS
news poll, 63
percent of Americans in competitive congressional districts think those
crossing illegally should be immediately deported or arrested. This
is undoubtedly contrary to the views expressed by the Democratic Party.
Their endgame is open borders,
which has become evident over the last eight years. Don't for one
second let them convince you otherwise."Evan Berryhill Twitter @EvBerryhill.
The Democrat Party’s secret agenda for wider open borders,
more welfare for invading illegals, more jobs and free anything they illegally
vote for…. All to destroy the two-party system and build the GLOBALISTS’
DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
Demonstrably and irrefutably the Democrat Party became the party whose principle objective is
to thoroughly transform the nature of the American electorate by means of open
borders and the mass, unchecked importation of illiterate third world peasants
who will vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats and their La Raza welfare
state. FRONTPAGE MAG
Two former Mexican presidents publicly denied taking bribes
from the Sinaloa Cartel. The statements came after the legal defense for
Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán Loera made contrary claims this week.
The drug lord is facing
several money laundering and drug trafficking charges at a federal trial in New
York. In his opening statement, defense attorney Jeffrey Lichtman spoke of
bribes “including the very top, the current president of Mexico and the
former.”
Soon after the
statements became public, Mexico’s government issued a statement denying the
allegations. Eduardo Sanchez, the spokesman for current Mexican President
Enrique Pena Nieto said the statements were false and “defamatory.”
El
gobierno de @EPN persiguió, capturó y extraditó al criminal Joaquín Guzmán Loera. Las
afirmaciones atribuidas a su abogado son completamente falsas y difamatorias
Former Mexican
President Felipe Calderon took to social media to personally deny the
allegations, claiming that neither El Chapo or the Sinaloa Cartel paid him
bribes.
Son
absolutamente falsas y temerarias las afirmaciones que se dice realizó el
abogado de Joaquín “el Chapo” Guzmán. Ni él, ni el cártel de Sinaloa ni ningún
otro realizó pagos a mi persona.
Under Guzman’s
leadership, the Sinaloa Cartel became the largest drug trafficking organization
in the world with influence in every major U.S. city.
The allegations against
Pena Nieto are not new. In 2016, Breitbart News reported on an
investigation by Mexican journalists which revealed how Juarez Cartel
operators funneled money into the 2012 presidential campaign. The investigation
was carried out by Mexican award-winning journalist Carmen Aristegui and her team. The
subsequent scandal became known as “Monexgate” for the cash cards that were given
out during Peña Nieto’s campaign. The allegations against Pena Nieto went
largely unreported by U.S. news outlets.
Ildefonso Ortiz is an award-winning journalist with Breitbart
Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Brandon Darby and
Stephen K. Bannon. You can follow him on Twitter and on Facebook. He can be contacted at Iortiz@breitbart.com.
Brandon Darby is the managing director and editor-in-chief of
Breitbart Texas. He co-founded the Cartel Chronicles project with Ildefonso
Ortiz and Stephen K. Bannon. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook. He can be contacted at bdarby@breitbart.com.
The opinions expressed by columnists are their
own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
One fact a lot of Americans forget is
that our country is located right up against a socialist failed state that is
promising to descend even further into chaos – not California, the other one.And
the Mexicans, having reached the bottom of the hole they have dug for
themselves, just chose to keep digging by electing a new
leftist presidente who wants to surrender to the cartels and who thinks that Mexicans
have some sort of hitherto unknown “human right” to sneak into the United
States and demographically reconquer it. There’s a Spanish phrase that
describes his ideology, and one of the words is toro.
Mexico is already a failed state,
crippled by a poisoned, stratified culture and a corrupt government that have
somehow managed to turn a nation so blessed with resources and hardworking
people into such a basket case that millions of its citizens see their best
option as putting themselves in the hands of gangsters to cross a burning
desert to get cut-rate jobs in el Norte. It is a country dominated by bloody
drug/human trafficking cartels that like to circulate videos of their members
carving up living people. They hang mutilated corpses from overpasses and
hijack busloads of citizens to rape and slaughter for fun. Whole police
agencies are owned by the cartels. Political candidates live in fear of murder.
The people are scared. And this chaos will inevitably grow and spread north.
The gangs
are already here, importing the meth and fentanyl that are slaughtering tens of
thousands of Americans a year after coming across the border the Democrats
refuse to defend. Let’s not even think about the other foreigners, like Islamic
terrorists, who might exploit this vulnerability. “Abolish ICE,” the liberals
screech, yet what they really mean is “Erase that line on the map.” But that
line is all that is keeping the bloodshed in Mexico at bay for now. You can
stand on US soil, look south, and see places where the rates of killing dwarf
those of the Middle Eastern killing fields you see on TV.
The chaos
in Mexico will spill over the theoretical border. It is just a matter of time.
Normal Americans know it. As my book upcoming
book Militant Normals explains, the establishment willfully
ignoring their legitimate concerns about border security is a big part of why
Normals are getting militant. The Democrats, and the GOP donor class stooges,
have a vested interest in ignoring the issue, and they will insure that both
the political class and the hack media will continue to play ostrich. Already
there are Americans, on American soil, living near the border who cannot
venture outside at night on their own property for fear of being murdered
because of foreigners invading out territory. This is intolerable for any
sovereign country. Yet there is a huge liberal constituency, abetted by GOPe
fellow travelers, not merely willing to tolerate the invasion but who actively
want to increase the flow.
When the
125-million-man criminal conspiracy that is Mexico falls apart completely, as
it will, we are going to have to deal with the consequences. Watch the flood of
illegals become a tsunami, a real refugee crisis instead of today’s fake one.
Watch the criminal gangs and pathologies of the Third World socialist culture
they bring along turn our country into Mexico II: Gringo Boogaloo.
And importing a huge mass of foreigners,
loyal to a foreign country and potentially susceptible to the reconquista de Aztlan rhetoric of leftists, both among them and among our treacherous
liberal elite, would create a cauldron for brewing up violent civil upheaval
right here at home.
So, what
do we do? We defend ourselves, obviously. But how?
Should we
be reactive? Should we continue the fake defense of our border we’re pretending
to conduct today? Or should we seriously defend ourselves by building a wall
and truly guarding it, and by deporting all illegals we catch inside. But would
that even be enough when Mexico collapses?
It’s time
to ask: Should we be proactive?
Should we
invade Mexico? Should we send our military across the Rio Grande to secure the
unstable territory, annihilate the criminal infestation that suppurates there,
and impose something resembling order? One thing is certain. The border charade
we tolerate today can’t be an option – it’s an open door to the fallout from
the failing state next door.
Militarily,
there are three obvious courses of action (I had input on this by several
people familiar with the issue; none of this reflects any actual operational
planning that I or anyone I spoke to is aware of).
One is
the Buffer Zone option. We move in and secure a zone perhaps 50-100 miles
inside the country, aggressively targeting and annihilating criminal gangs – we
know where these bastards are – and thereby seal off the threat until Mexico is
secure again and then return the territory once we are assured America is safe.
This is
doable, but it would take a huge chunk of our military forces (we would need to
call up most of our reserves). The conventional Mexican forces that fought
would last for about un momento before being vaporized, but
it would spark at a minimum a low-intensity insurgency by cartel hardliners
and, at worst, a large one by Mexican patriots, probably using guns left over
from when the Obama cartel was shipping them south. Regardless, it would be
expensive. There is the “You break it, you buy it” rule. We would end up
administering a long strip of territory full of people living, largely, in what
Americans consider abject poverty. They would become our problem. Moreover,
there is the giving back part – millions of Mexicans might find they like being
nieces and nephews of Tio Sam.
The
second is Operation Mexican Freedom, a much more ambitious campaign that would
recognize what liberals already think – that Mexico and America are one
country. Our forces would conquer the nation by driving all the way south,
perhaps with an amphibious landing at Veracruz for old times sake and because
the Marines would insist, then seal the Mexican-Guatemalan border. We would
annex the whole country, making it a colony like Puerto Rico (A dozen new
senators from Old Mexico? Nogracias). We would kill every
terrorist drug gang member and take or torch everything they own, while
simultaneously deporting every illegal from the US-Canada border to the
Mexican-Guatemalan border.
Of
course, that would take up pretty much our entire military and certainly spark
some sort of endless guerilla conflict. We would be stuck in another bloody,
expensive fight to make a Third World country cease sucking despite itself. It
would make the Iraq War seem cheap. But, on the plus side, Bill Kristol and his
bombs away pals would probably be excited.
Oh, in
both cases the Europeans would be outraged, which is a powerful argument for
these options.
Still,
no. Invading Mexico is a bad idea. It would convert the problems of Mexico,
created and perpetuated by Mexicans, into our problems. We tried that in the
Middle East. It doesn’t work. Making Mexico better for Mexicans is not worth
the life of one First Infantry Division grenadier.
But the
consequences in America are our problem, and we must solve it. That brings us
to the third option – Forward Defense. Think Syria in Sinaloa. We secure the
border, with a wall of concrete and a wall of troops, perhaps imposing a
no-fly/no-sail zone (excepting our surveillance and attack aircraft), and then
conduct operations inside Mexico using special operations forces combined with
airpower to target and eliminate the cartels. We would also identify friendly
local Mexican police and military officials and support their counter-cartel
operations outside of our relationship with the central government – they would
be the face of the fight. We would channel Hernán Cortés and, in essence, we would allow
friendly Mexican allies, with our substantial direct and indirect support, to
create our buffer zone for us.
This
avoids the problem of buying Mexico’s problems and making them ours. It’s
somewhat deniable; everyone could save face by denying the Yankees have
intervened. But the cartels would not just sit there and take it. They would
target Americans and probably do so inside the United States. Yet that’s going
to happen anyway eventually. This course of action risks the lowest number of
US casualties, but perhaps the highest number of Mexican losses.
So no, we
should not invade Mexico. There are no good military options, and none are
necessary or wise today, but we may eventually have to choose between bad
options. Mexico is failing more and more every day. We are not yet at the point
of a military solution, but anyone who says that day can never come is lying to
himself and to you. We need a wall, but more than that, we need the commitment
to American security and sovereignty that a wall would physically represent.
The issue is very clear, and we need to be very, very clear about it when we
are campaigning in November. Border security. Period.
Are we
going to prioritize the interests of liberals who want to replace our militant Normal
voters with
pliable foreigners and establishment stooges who want to please rich donors by
importing countless cheap foreign laborers, or are we going to prioritize the
economic security and the physical safety of American citizens by securing our
border no matter what it takes?
Come on,
open borders mafia, let’s have that discussion. Bueno suerte with
that at the ballot box.
In
Mexico, it is often impolite to tell someone "No." If you
want to spare someone's feelings, many people say "Maybe."
Everyone
knows that means "No."
Mexico
stopped worrying about American feelings long ago. Among the
fashionable public officials and academics, scorn has been the ruling emotion
for decades. We see that more recently in the last week's elections.
Pretending
otherwise is just too much work in Mexico today. The new president
declares he is a socialist, but he will be hard pressed to show how his new
socialist policies are at all different from the old socialist policies that
govern so many parts of Mexican life. That's what we said about
Venezuela, come to think of it.
Those
who predict that their "Fill in Blank" Latin American country has
finally bottomed out and is now turning around are often, even invariably,
wrong.
But
at least admitting they are socialists has the added benefit of sticking a
finger in the eye of their terrible neighbors to the north – who everyone knows
ruined Mexico by stealing a good chunk of the country in 1848.
Anyone
who reads the daily papers in Mexico is reminded of that 157-year-old treaty
every day: for most of the country, the national slogan and curse remains
"Mexico, so far from God, so close to the United States." We can even hear it
today from Mexican nationals and their descendants in the U.S. who glorify La
Raza at the expense of their adopted country.
Oh,
and by the way, Americans are still waiting for any kind of public display of
support for those who died on 9-11. Mexicans largely ignored it,
when they were not supporting it behind closed doors at their local universities.
The
truly troubling pronouncements out of Mexico City are even easier to
find. The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful
during the election when he told his compadres they should all move
to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty
policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration.
Then
members of López-Obrador's Cabinet-in-waiting started talking about the war on
drug cartels, and why should Mexico do America's dirty work?
The
first statement does not need much interpretation, other than the obvious but
often ignored: the new president of Mexico is encouraging his countrymen to
invade the United States. Not with guns and soldiers, but with campesinos and huaraches.
It's
a bitter and hostile act that we should treat as such.
The
new talk about amnesty for drug-dealers is even crazier. This is
just an admission of what anyone who cares to already knows: Mexico is run by a
collection of drug cartels and other violent outlaws. This
collection of criminals has killed thousands of public officials, policemen,
and reporters – all in the name of preserving a criminal status quo that no one
even feels like pretending does not exist anymore. They even write
songs glorifying them.
They
get what they want when they want it.
That
is why we cannot build the Coulter-Trump Border Wall fast enough, tall enough,
and proudly enough.
In addition to writing scintillating bestsellers about black
violence in America, good ol' Colin Flaherty also covered Mexico for several
newspapers and radio stations in San Diego, back in the day.
AZTLAN: THE RISE OF THE
MEXICAN FASCIST WELFARE STATE in LOS ANGELES
"La Voz de Aztlan has
produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US
citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to
transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are
over 200,000 (dated) "Anchor
Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the
figure is closer to 300,000 (dated).
La Voz de Aztlan believes that
the number is approximately 500,000 (dated) "Anchor
Babies" born every year."
Professor Predicts
'Hispanic Homeland' ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A University of New Mexico Chicano
Studies professor predicts a new, sovereign Hispanic nation within the century,
taking in the Southwest and several northern states of Mexico. Charles Truxillo
suggests the “Republica del Norte,” the Republic of the North, is “an
inevitability.” He envisions it encompassing all of California, Arizona, New
Mexico, Texas and southern Colorado
“The following is a partial list of politicians that are La
Raza members working for open borders, amnesty (illegal Mexicans are not
interested in citizenship) and no wall. The ultimate goal of Mexico is to
continue successfully using the United States as their welfare system, cut a
deal whereby the illegals can hop the border, give birth, pillage, make their
pesos and then return home.”
DAVIDSIROTA.com
"After six years of the corrupt and brutal rule of
the PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party) administration of President Enrique
Peña Nieto, Mexico is mired in pandemic violence, unprecedented social
inequality and staggering levels of unemployment as well as deepening poverty
for the majority of the population."
The
elections in Mexico and the political tasks of the working class
30 June 2018
The national elections
taking place in Mexico on Sunday pose vital issues before the Mexican and
international working class.
After six years
of the corrupt and brutal rule of the PRI (Institutional Revolutionary Party)
administration of President Enrique Peña Nieto, Mexico is mired in pandemic
violence, unprecedented social inequality and staggering levels of unemployment
as well as deepening poverty for the majority of the population.
The ruling PRI,
which held undisputed power from 1929 to 2000, is so hated that it chose as its
candidate a “technocrat”, José Antonio Meade, who is not even a member of the
party. He is running third in the polls, and there is distinct possibility that
the party will face a nationwide route on the local, state and federal levels.
The candidate of
the right-wing PAN (National Action Party), with which the PRI has alternated
power since the dawn of the new millennium, Ricardo Anaya, is widely viewed as
a representative of the corrupt system of bribes and kickbacks that he oversaw
as the former head of the president of the Mexican Chamber of Deputies.
With the massive
popular repudiation of these two traditional ruling parties, Andrés Manuel
López Obrador, the former mayor of Mexico City and now three-time presidential
candidate, running as leader of the MORENA (Movimiento de Regeneración
Nacional) party, is projected by virtually every poll to win the July 1
election by an historically unprecedented margin.
The coming to power
of López Obrador will yield not a way out of the current crisis, but its sharp
intensification and new dangers for the Mexican working class. Sooner rather
than later, a MORENA-led administration will betray the mass aspirations for an
end to the social hardship and suffering that López Obrador has cynically
exploited.
There are no doubt
substantial popular illusions in López Obrador, or AMLO as he is popularly
known. A 64-year-old professional politician, he began his career in the PRI,
leaving it for the PRD (Democratic Revolutionary Party) and twice running as
its presidential candidate. He went on to found MORENA after the PRD turned
sharply to the right, signing on to Peña Nieto’s 2012 “Pact for Mexico”, which
opened up Mexico’s labor market, its education system, and the energy,
financial, and telecommunication sectors to privatization schemes and so-called
free-market “reforms.”
The closing of
AMLO’s campaign Wednesday night, staged before a crowd that packed the Azteca
stadium in southern Mexico City, provided an illustration of the sharp
contradiction between the popular illusions in López Obrador and the reality of
his class position and political program.
While vowing that
the ruling parties of the past would lose the election, he promised that there
“will not be reprisals.” This means that the crimes of the past six years,
including the disappearance and presumed murder of the 43 Ayotzinapa teaching
students, along with countless other massacres by state security forces, not to
mention the wholesale corruption which AMLO has made the centerpiece of his
campaign, will go unpunished.
He promised that
“we will seek unity to the extent that we can.” Indeed, right-wing former PRI
and PAN officials are already being integrated into AMLO’s prospective cabinet,
guaranteeing continuity of the anti-working class policies carried out by both
parties over the course of decades.
He signaled his
readiness to enter a dialogue and reach agreements with Donald Trump, who after
Peña Nieto is the most hated man in Mexico for his undisguised anti-Mexican
racism, persecution of immigrants and demands that Mexico pay up to $15 billion
to build a wall on its border. AMLO said that he would propose to Trump the
creation of “something like the old Alliance for Progress,” the aid program
inaugurated under US President Kennedy in 1961 with the aim of tying Latin
America closer to US imperialism and forestalling left-nationalist revolutions
like the one in Cuba.
As López Obrador
has emerged as the all but certain victor in the July 1 election, he has moved
steadily to the right, even as Mexico’s ruling oligarchy, which formerly
denounced him as a demagogue bent on turning Mexico into a new Cuba or
Venezuela, has moved to accept him.
Indeed, billionaire
Carlos Slim, the richest man in Mexico and formally the richest man in the
world, warned recently that if AMLO failed to be elected president, the country
would face economic instability.
In an appearance
before the heads of Mexico’s major banks in March, the MORENA candidate vowed
that the “property regime” in Mexico would be respected, with no plans for
“expropriations or nationalizations.” He swore his fealty to the “market
economy” and promised that his policies would not “affect the banking sector at
all.”
Similarly, his
aides and advisors have walked back AMLO’s previous denunciations of the drive
to privatize Mexico’s previously state-controlled energy sector and open it up
to exploitation by international energy conglomerates, promising that all such
contracts will be respected.
The markets have
already factored in the victory of López Obrador, and by all accounts see no
threat to the interests of Mexican and world capitalism.
“This stability is
perhaps surprising,” said the director general of the Mexican stock exchange,
José Oriol Bosch. “There are always those who look for the negative, but what
is being demonstrated in the markets is that the country is prepared for this
process.”
After his meetings
with executives of major international banks such as Citigroup Inc. and
JPMorgan Chase & Co. in recent months, Wall Street is similarly bullish on
an AMLO victory.
It cannot be
excluded, given the deep crisis and bitter divisions within the Mexican ruling
class, that the 2018 election will be determined not by the popular vote, but
by electoral fraud. Such was the case in 1988, when the election was stolen
from Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas in order to install the PRI candidate Carlos Salinas.
This has been the
most violent election year in Mexican history, with over 120 politicians
murdered since campaigning began. These killings take place in the context of a
continuing wave of violence, claiming 8,000 lives in the same period, in a
country where at least 35,000 people are classified as disappeared.
The passing of a
Domestic Security Law last year has given the president the authority to impose
what amounts to martial law, deploying the army to the streets. An attempt to
impose a president under such conditions, however, could quickly plunge
volatile Mexico into violent social upheaval.
The international
working class has undergone bitter experiences with bourgeois parties like
MORENA, resting on affluent layers of the middle class and employing vaguely
left phrases, while promising “hope” and “change.” Just across Mexico’s
northern border, American workers made such an experience with Democrat Barack Obama,
hailed by the pseudo-left as a “transformational president,” who, once in
power, imposed policies that expanded war, accelerated the transfer of wealth
from the bottom to the top and increased mass deportations to record levels.
Then there was the
election of Syriza in Greece. Hailed by petty-bourgeois left parties throughout
the world, it came to power in 2015 on the basis of promises to end EU-imposed
austerity measures, only to capitulate within months, trampling underfoot a
referendum rejecting austerity by a landslide and imposing the cuts demanded by
the international banks.
There is a striking
similarity between the campaigns waged by Syriza and MORENA. Syriza formed a
coalition after the 2015 election with the Independent Greeks, a right-wing nationalist
party that advocates anti-immigrant policies and support for the Greek Orthodox
Church, while engaging in open anti-Semitism.
AMLO’s Morena is
running in Sunday’s election as part of a coalition that includes the Social
Encounter Party (PES), a right-wing party comprised mostly of Evangelical
Christians that campaigns against gay rights, same-sex marriage and abortion.
This remarkable
symmetry is by no means coincidental. In both cases, the alliance of these
supposed “left” bourgeois candidates with parties of the extreme right
represents an unmistakable signal to the ruling establishment that they can be
entrusted to defend the interests of both national and foreign capital,
including through the support of the most right-wing policies.
MORENA and AMLO
represent the interests of capitalism. It is notable that López Obrador has not
embraced or welcomed the explosive struggles of the Mexican workers and
oppressed, from the gasolinazo protests
against the hiking of energy costs to the strikes of teachers and the ongoing
struggles of victims of state violence.
While promising the
cheapest form of populism, a struggle against corruption—while guaranteeing
impunity for the corrupt—and minimal increases in social assistance programs
for the poor, it can be certain that a López Obrador administration will
respond to pressure from the working class not with concessions, but with
ferocious attacks in defense of the interests of the financial elite that has
embraced AMLO.
The acute crisis in
Mexico and the lack of an independent political alternative for the working
class underscores the urgency of building a new revolutionary leadership, a
section of the International Committee of the Fourth International, fighting to
unite the struggles of the Mexican working class with those of workers in the
United States and throughout the Americas to put an end to capitalism.
Today's
lesson on morality and human rights comes
from the probable (according to polls) next president of
our crime-infested and corrupt neighbor to the south (emphases added):
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO)
called for mass immigration to the United States[,] ...declaring it a "human
right" for all North Americans.
"[W]e will defend all the migrants in the American continent
and all the migrants in the world," Obrador said, adding that immigrants
"must leave their
towns and find a life in the United States."
Apparently,
the U.S. must welcome an unlimited number of these unwanted, by their own president,
Mexicans, because the U.S. is morally obligated to serve as Mexico's
social-dysfunction safety valve and ATM.
Did you
know that "chutzpah" is the same in Hebrew and Spanish? On
the other hand, everyone knows that Obrador can count on a large cohort of
Democrats, who share
his view:
The reaction among immigration advocates has gone from outrage
about family separations to consternation about family detention, because their
ultimate goal is to let the migrants come into the United States and stay.
Lest anyone
misunderstand, when Democrats say "the," they mean "all." Today,
it's "family separations"; tomorrow, who knows? But
whatever the Dems'démagogie
du jour, most Americans want illegal immigration greatly reduced
and, ideally, eliminated. The latter, most likely, is a pipe
dream. But not only can the former be done. It can be
done using methods already tried and proven.
First, yes,
we need a wall. If the tooth-and-nail opposition of our open-border
Democratic friends is insufficient evidence that a wall would work, consider,
as President Trump has, Israel's wall. Israel had an illegal alien
problem, too – or she did, until she built a wall, as a February 2017 Senate
report confirmed:
The number of illegal crossers on the Israel-Egypt border dropped
after the construction of the fence, from more than 16,000 in 2011 to less than
20 in 2016 – a 99 percent decrease.
One can
argue, as some do, that other Israeli measures contributed to the
decrease. But there can be no doubt that the wall was the primary,
and a major, factor.
So a wall –
and ending chain migration, and ending the visa lottery, and mandatory E‑Verify
– will greatly reduce unlawful immigration. But there is one more
thing government can do.
Allow the
writer, whose father immigrated to America as a refugee, in 1948, to elucidate:
When the
writer's dad got off the boat, he did not simply disembark in Manhattan,
casually stroll streets paved with gold and buy the Brooklyn
Bridge. First, he had to stop here:
In the first half of the 19th century, most immigrants arriving in
New York City landed at docks on the east side of the tip of Manhattan, around
South Street. On August 1, 1855, Castle Clinton became the Emigrant
Landing Depot[.] ... [W]hen the U.S. government assumed control of immigration
processing, [it moved] the center to the larger, more isolated Ellis Island facility
on January 2, 1892 ... because immigrants were known to carry diseases, which
led to epidemics of cholera and smallpox.
The key
word in the above quote is "isolated," as in no physical route for
unlawful aliens on to the mainland.
Then, the
dangers were cholera and smallpox. Today, the dangers are MS-13
violence, lack of education and marketable skills, and the threat of someday
becoming citizens and voting for Democrats. In both cases, the
problem was a threat to the population from foreign immigration. And
in both cases, the solution was to isolate new arrivals until they could be
properly vetted and admitted into the mainland U.S. lawfully.
The writer
lives in New York City, and last time he checked, Ellis Island was still there,
repurposed as a museum. So how about making so-called
catch-and-release unnecessary by returning Ellis Island to its original use and
supplementing or replacing the current buildings with one or more new, modern
dormitories, where illegals seized at the border could be housed comfortably,
for as long as required, and with no need to separate families?
On the
other hand, Ellis Island is on the opposite side of the country from the
Mexican border, where the main problem is. Alcatraz Island is
not. What about the Virgin Islands, Guam, or any number of U.S.
island possessions, where the climate is both comfortable and similar to that
of Mexico and Central America? The specific location is less
important than that there be no physical access to the mainland, nor would the housing
need to be overly expensive – Quonset huts if space allows, or easily
convertible, and stackable, cargo containers.
The U.S. Navy drafting plans to house up to 25,000 immigrants on
its bases and other facilities, at an estimated cost of about $233 million over
six months, as the Trump administration seeks to ease a mounting crisis on the
Mexican border[.] ...
[T]he draft document ... also says that a Navy base in California
could house up to a further 47,000 people.
Problem
solved...almost. It's a good plan, but with one major flaw: perhaps
the writer is mistaken, but it seems that all of the proposed military bases
are on the mainland U.S. Again, the locations should be isolated,
with no physical connection to the mainland. There is also the issue
of cost and not just the $233 million for six months (so $466 billion per
year); one company has a $162-million
contract "to fly immigrant children to
shelters across the United States."
There is a
better, and possibly cheaper, solution. It's staring the Navy right
in the face.
Surely,
most readers know that the Navy maintains a reserve, or "mothball,"
fleet of decommissioned ships anchored in various parts of the country, including
California.
Your
typical aircraft carrier houses about 6,000 sailors. But think of
all that extra space on the (unused) flight deck. Aircraft carriers also
have kitchens specifically designed to feed thousands of people.
America is
not suffering from a shortage of decommissioned ships. Why pay
hundreds of millions of dollars to fly apprehended illegals to multiple
locations around the continental U.S. when the Navy can move the ships to the
immigrants, anchoring as close to the problem as possible but far enough from
shore to keep illegals from accessing the mainland? Other mothballed
ships could ferry large numbers of illegals to and from the offshore ships far
more cheaply than flying them all over the country.
Additional
ships could even return rejected aliens to their home countries – preferably,
as Eisenhower did, on the side of the home country farthest from the U.S.
Should any
liberal open-borders Democrat complain, just casually mention, preferably
publicly, that American sailors lived on those same ships, for much longer, and
make popcorn while Democrats explain why what was good enough for American
sailors is not good enough for foreigners, who have done nothing for America
and who have no legal right even to be here.
Let all
potential trespassers know that should they manage to violate our border, the
only part of America they will ever see is the part of America they can see
from the deck of a ship before being transported on a slow boat back to their
home countries, and unlawful immigration will drop. Like a rock.
Gene
Schwimmer is a New York- and New Jersey-licensed real estate broker and author
of The
Christian State.
LA RAZA IMPERIALISM
WE ARE PAYING FOR OUR OWN INVASION! THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION
AND WELFARE STATE NOT ONLY COST US OUR JOBS, BUT ALSO
“In his state of the union address to the Mexican nation,
Calderon established his imperialistic imperatives: "I have said that
Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is
Mexico. And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen
is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights."
*
"We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by
that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him." --- La
Raza early founders, Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez.
“Currently, the U.S. admits more than 1.5 million legal and
illegal immigrants every year, with more than 70 percent coming to the country
through the process known as “chain migration” whereby newly naturalized
citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S. In the
next 20 years, the current U.S. legal immigration system is on track to import roughly 15 million new foreign-born voters.
Between seven and eight million of those foreign-born voters will arrive in the
U.S. through chain migration.” JOHN BINDER
PAUL KRUGMAN
The disintegration of California,
a Mexican satellite welfare state of poverty, crime and high taxes
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel
López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States during a
speech Tuesday declaring it a "human right" for all North
Americans. "And soon, very soon – after the victory of our
movement – we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all
the migrants in the world," Obrador said, adding that immigrants
"must leave their towns and find a life in the United States."
He then declared it as "a human right we
will defend," eluniversal.comreports. While the
election is not until July 1, Obrador is by far the frontrunner.
Now,
let's analyze what he said.
First,
how would any of this help Mexico? My serious Mexican friends tell
me they'd rather find prosperity and jobs in their country. Telling
people to go north is another way of saying that AMLO's policies will not help
Mexico keep Mexicans. Believe it or not, most Mexicans would rather
stay home, or at least that's what they tell me.
Second,
is AMLO proposing to change Mexico's rigid immigration laws? Is he
going to open Mexico's southern border and allow people in? How does
AMLO define a "migrant"?
Third,
does he believe that the U.S. is just going to sit back and watch Mexicans
cross the border?
The
bad news is that AMLO's remarks are irresponsible and not
helpful. The good news is that he may be getting desperate, sensing
that Mr. Anaya is gaining on him.
1) Mexico ended legal immigration 100 years
ago, except for Spanish blood.
2) Mexico is the 17th richest nation but pays
the 220th lowest minimum wage to force their subjects to invade the USA. The
expands territory for Mexicans, spreads the Spanish language, and culture and
genotypes, while earning 17% of Mexico's gross GDP as Foreign Remittance
Income.
DEATH OF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS AND THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S WELFARE
STATE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE ON AMERICAN BACKS.
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés
Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) called for mass immigration to the United States
during a speech Tuesday declaring it a “human right” for all North Americans.
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we
will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in
the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find
a life in the United States.”
He then declared it as “a human right we
will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.
While the election is not until July 1,
Obrador is by far the frontrunner.
Obrador in April delivered speech
criticizing Trump and promising that Mexico will not become a “piñata” for any
foreign government, Global News reports.
The former mayor of Mexico City, Obrador
holds progressive populist views. The 64-year-old ran unsuccessfully for
president twice before, according
to DW.
Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed granting
amnesty to Mexican drug cartels. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net,
and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added.
To be sure, AMLO is
only saying out loud what every other Mexican president believed in his heart;
that America is Mexico's "social safety net" and that it's up to the
US taxpayer to take care of Mexico's unemployable, destitute millions.
Unsaid by AMLO is the
implication of a mass migration of Mexicans to the US. The not-so-secret dream
of every Mexican government that illegals flooding into America will eventually
allow for a "return" of California and much of the American southwest
to Mexico.
What makes this
socialist different, however, is his novel argument that entering the US
illegally is actually a "human right." That's an opinion we
could have a lot of fun with. One would assume if it was a "human
right" to illegally enter the US, that it would then be a human right to
enter Mexico - or any other country, for that matter.
Of course,
AMLO is just pushing leftist buttons by proclaiming this brand spanking
new human right. He can't be serious, can he? It hardly matters. Trump will,
I'm sure, have something to say about a mass migration of Mexicans to the
US and if this socialist nutjob actually believes he can encourage that
kind of invasion and not suffer any consequences, he doesn't know our
president.
Adios, Sanctuary La Raza Welfare State of California
A fifth-generation
Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are
coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over
2.6 million. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates
that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens,
including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs.
MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORT TO AMERICA… POVERTY,
CRIMINALS, ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE and HEROIN
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
“Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them.”
“The
following is a partial list of politicians that are La Raza members working for
open borders, amnesty (illegal Mexicans are not interested in citizenship) and
no wall. The ultimate goal of Mexico is to continue successfully using the
United States as their welfare system, cut a deal whereby the illegals can hop
the border, give birth, pillage, make their pesos and then return
home.” DAVID SIROTA.com
According
to the nonpartisan Center for Immigration Studies, the deportations occurred
between October 2008 and February 2015. The three counties with the most deportations during this period were Los
Angeles County, Calif.; Maricopa County, Ariz.; and Harris County, Texas.
OBAMA’S
INVASION OF ILLEGALS IS WORKING!
They’re already
signed up to vote LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEM!
“According
to Immigration and Customers Enforcement data first obtained by the Associated
Press this week, about 70 percent of the 40,000 migrant family members arrested
at the border since May did not follow up their arrest with a necessary visit
to an immigration office.”
This annual income for an impoverished American family is
$10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on
each unaccompanied minor border crosser.
A study by Tom Wong of the University of
California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of DACA-enrolled
illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals about 200,000
anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens. This does
not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal aliens. JOHN BINDER
Mexico has a radical
idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However,
Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for our
Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill.
That’s too
bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliensthan the United
States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal
alien in Mexico.
At a time when
the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with
foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look
at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve
our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single, streamlined law that
ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
§in the country legally;
§have the means to sustain themselves economically;
§not destined to be burdens on society;
§of economic and social benefit to society;
§of good character and have no criminal records; and
§contributors to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also ensures
that:
§immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
§foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
§foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s
internal politics;
§foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or
deported;
§foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned
or deported;
§those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.
Who could disagree
with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution strictly
defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens,
illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or
General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration
policy.
It is an interesting
law — and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great southern
neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when
its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony
is a
crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony
to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
If the United States
adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a manifestation of
American racism and bigotry.
We looked at
the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. [1] Now let’s look at Mexico’s main
immigration law.
Mexico welcomes only
foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
§Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their
possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
§Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be
useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for
their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
§Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets
“the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed
detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like
good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and
when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
§The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission
of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article
38)
Mexican authorities
must keep track of every single person in the country:
§Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal
immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal
immigrants. (Article 73)
§A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single
individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each
individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
§A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and
immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking
number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake
papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
§Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or
imprisoned. (Article 116)
§Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is
false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and
imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail
to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
§Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be
punished. (Article 117)
§Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter
the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years.
(Article 118)
§Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to
up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who
misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working with out
a permit — can also be imprisoned.
Under Mexican law,
illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
§“A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three
hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the
country illegally.” (Article 123)
§Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from
Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
§Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security”
will be deported. (Article 126)
Mexicans who help
illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the
law:
§A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping
the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison.
(Article 127)
§Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners
into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)
All of the above runs
contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark
contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American
immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican
government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United
States.
Let’s call Mexico’s
bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s
propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own
law as a model.
Where To Go When Your Local Emergency Room Goes
Bankrupt?"
THE QUESTION SHOULD BE WHERE DO ILLEGALS GO FOR “FREE”
MEDICAL.
During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have
declared bankruptcy and closed their Emergency Rooms forever. Financially crippled by legislative and
judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals! In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2
million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both
routine and emergency care. Per official
figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.
THE REASON WHY OBAMA NOMINATED SOTOMAYER WAS BECAUSE, LIKE
OBAMA SHE PANDERS TO BIG BUSINESS, AND HIS A LA RAZA PART MEMBER. SOTOMAYER
VOTED NO AGAINST STATES RIGHTS TO IMPOSE E-VERIFY!
No Latino was nominated that time. But when President Obama
nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the high court three years ago, Fantauzzi said,
Mexican American groups strongly supported her.
Latino analysts dubious of Rubio's potential benefit for
Romney
Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who has been mentioned as Mitt
Romney's potential running mate, is unlikely to do much to boost the GOP
presidential candidate's Latino support, experts and polls say.
Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida introduces GOP presidential
candidate Mitt Romney at an April campaign event in Aston, Pa. “The idea that
Marco Rubio would galvanize a large segment of the Hispanic vote purely because
he’s Hispanic is a fallacy,” a national Puerto Rican group leader says. (Jae C.
Hong, Associated Press / May 20, 2012)
By Hector Becerra, Los Angeles Times (HECTOR BECERRA IS A LA
RAZA SUPREMACIST)
May 19, 2012, 10:10 p.m.
Handsome, youthful, Cuban American and Republican, U.S. Sen.
Marco Rubio of Florida has been mentioned repeatedly as a potential running
mate for Mitt Romney — in part because of hopes that the presence of the first
Latino on a major national ticket would draw that key voting group Romney's
way.
But outside of his enormously important home state, the
prospect for that sort of boost seems less than likely.
Some voters would probably be attracted by the idea of a
Latino, any Latino, being that close to the White House. (Others, particularly
Democrats and left-leaning independents, might never consider a vote for the
GOP ticket.)
One complication is internal rivalries amid the diverse group
of 22 million potential voters that, for demographic purposes, is treated as
one unified electoral bloc.
"Mexicans and Central Americans historically have a
reason for being Democrats, and Cubans have good reasons for being
Republicans," said Jesus Hernandez Cuellar, a Cuban American editor of an
online magazine. "I don't think the great electoral mass, the Mexican
Americans, will change their point of view on the election just because of
Marco Rubio."
Rubio and Romney are scheduled to speak Wednesday at a
meeting in Washington of the Latino Coalition, a nonprofit small-business
organization. The Florida senator has said in the past that he would decline
being the vice presidential nominee if the position were offered. That hasn't
stopped speculation about him, or to a lesser extent, another Latino politician
being Romney's running mate.
But experts and several polls have suggested a Latino on the
Republican ticket would yield a limited payoff with the broader Latino
community.
Despite sharing a language, and often having similar stories
of how they or their forebears arrived on American shores, the Latino
population is far from monolithic, and subject to the same jealousies,
rivalries and prejudices as other groups.
Cuban Americans face resentment from some other Latinos
because of the perception that America has given immigrants from the Communist
island nation a leg up, Cuellar said.
"There's some resentment, and it's not just because of
the embargo [on Cuba] or political votes," he said. "Cubans who come
to the United States can almost immediately, one year and a day, apply for
legal residency. That's created some divisions."
But the divisions don't stop with the Cubans. Jokes and
stereotypes fly freely among many Latino subgroups, sometimes masking more
barbed feelings over things like relative skin color and perceptions of social
class, or the way different Latinos talk.
Karen Anzoategui, an Argentine American actress and
performance artist in Los Angeles, has heard them all. How do Argentines commit
suicide? They climb to the top of their ego and jump. Mostly she laughs along,
but things can get a little heavier whenever she puts on the jersey of her
beloved Argentina for a big soccer match against Mexico.
"I grew up with Mexicans surrounding me, but there's a
lot of tension when I wear that jersey. Neighbors stare at me," said
Anzoategui, who grew up in the Los Angeles County city of Huntington Park.
"But I feel like Guatemalans and Salvadorans like Argentina because the
Mexicans think they're better than them, and when we play Mexico, we always
beat them."
Raul Claros, an L.A. community activist of Salvadoran and
Costa Rican descent, said he'd had more than one debate with Mexicans over the
relative merits of each group's colorful catalog of profanities.
"If you get a group of Salvadorans together, a lot of
times they'll use words that sound belligerent amongst themselves, but they'll
offend no one," he said with a laugh. "But you bring in one
non-Salvadoran, and they have to exit the room."
Matt Barreto, a political science professor at the University
of Washington, said there is more that unifies Latinos than divides them.
There are interesting differences between Puerto Ricans and
Dominicans in New York, Barreto said, "but politically, when it comes to
the general election, they vote together nine times out of 10."
In a tight presidential race, Latinos could play a
significant role because of their growing population in a number of competitive
states.
"The states which are competitive are changing: the
Mountain West, the Southwest and the South, for example," Barreto said.
"These track with demographic changes where the Latino vote is
growing."
In 2004, more than 40% of Latinos voted for President George
W. Bush, a very high percentage for a Republican presidential candidate.
Significantly though, Bush was seen as relatively liberal on illegal
immigration and friendly toward Latinos, particularly those of Mexican descent,
compared with many Republican leaders, including Romney. Bush also has a
sister-in-law of Mexican descent.
Romney has been polling at more than 25% among Latinos, said
Mark Hugo Lopez, associate director of the Pew Hispanic Center.
Polling by Latino Decisions, an opinion research group
Barreto co-founded, shows that a similar proportion of Latino voters view the
GOP as hostile. And he said polls on Rubio showed no major support among
Latinos outside of Florida.
Claros, the Salvadoran-Costa Rican, said many Central
Americans feel overlooked in places where people of Mexican descent dominate.
But despite rivalries and occasional resentments, he said he feels more of a
kinship with Mexican Americans than he would with Cuban Americans, Puerto
Ricans or other groups.
"They're East Coast Latinos. We're West Coast
Latinos," Claros said. "If you're Central American, there's a
disconnect with Cubans because you're not exposed to a lot of Cuban families or
Cuban culture."
Rafael Fantauzzi, president of the National Puerto Rican
Coalition in Washington, said he recalled when President Clinton considered
nominating a Puerto Rican to the Supreme Court. Some Mexican Americans opposed
it, thinking the nominee should be from the largest Latino group, he said.
No Latino was nominated that time. But when President Obama
nominated Sonia Sotomayor to the high court three years ago, Fantauzzi said,
Mexican American groups strongly supported her.
"The first Latino on the bench is a Puerto Rican from
New York, and it never would have happened without our Mexican American
brothers and sisters pushing the White House for that," said Ruben Diaz
Jr., the Bronx borough president and a former New York state legislator.
Fantauzzi said some Latinos think Puerto Ricans don't care
about issues like illegal immigration, being citizens by birth. That's not
really true, he said, though for many Latinos, including Mexican Americans, the
live-wire issue of illegal immigration isn't the top priority this election.
Still, Fantauzzi said choosing someone on a presidential
ticket with a Spanish surname isn't necessarily a winning formula to get the
Latino vote, he said.
"The idea that Marco Rubio would galvanize a large
segment of the Hispanic vote purely because he's Hispanic is a fallacy,"
Fantauzzi said. "It's an insult to our intelligence that we would not
really look at the value of a candidate and just look at his culture."
“A recent Pew poll indicated that a
very large percentage of Americans of Mexican descent regard themselves as
Mexicans. Not Mexican-Americans, not American-Mexicans. Just Mexicans.”
“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll
declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2]
Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured
the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are
harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In
fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the
illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually
strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”
Just over half, 54 percent, say it is
important that they change to assimilate into society, yet about two-thirds, 66
percent, say Latinos should maintain their distinct culture.
“Analysts said the operation appeared designed to allay
skepticism among Mexico's political leaders about the U.S. government's
commitment to Mexico's crackdown on cartels. The drug-related violence has
taken about 15,000 lives since President Felipe Calderón entered office in
2006. Mexican authorities have arrested 80,000 drug suspects, and Washington
has responded with $1.4 billion in aid under the Merida initiative, but some in
Mexico have grown frustrated with the U.S. market's continuing demand for
illegal drugs. “
*
1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal
aliens each year by state governments.
10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate
that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular,
their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .
11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION
illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal
aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth,
heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.
12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total
cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average
cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'
WHILE BARACK OBAMA CONTINUES TO SELL US OUT TO HIS BANKSTER
PAYMASTERS, AND THE LA RAZA PARTY , THERE ARE THOSE FIGHTING TO GET OUR COUNTRY
BACK!
HEARD ENGLISH TODAY?
You can contact President Obama and let him know of your
opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/
*
THE REAL LATINO IN OUR SCHOOLS
Here’s one teacher’s report on the illegals in our schools.
TEACHER’S POSTING ON CRAIGSLIST:
Subject: Cheap Labor This should make everyone think, be you
Democrat, Republican or Independent From a California school teacher.
"As you listen to the news about the student protests
over illegal immigration, there are some things that you should be aware
of: I am in charge of the
English-as-a-second-language department at a large southern California high
school which is designated a Title 1 school, meaning that its students average
lower socioeconomic and income levels.
Most of the schools you are hearing about, South Gate High, Bell
Gardens, Huntington Park, etc., where these students are protesting, are also
Title 1 schools. Title 1 schools are on
the free breakfast and free lunch program. When I say free breakfast, I'm not
talking a glass of milk and roll -- but a full breakfast and cereal bar with
fruits and juices that would make a Marriott proud. The waste of this food is
monumental, with trays and trays of it being dumped in the trash uneaten. (OUR
TAX DOLLARS AT WORK) I estimate that
well over 50% of these students are obese or at least moderately overweight.
About 75% or more DO have cell phones. The school also provides day care
centers for the unwed teenage pregnant girls (some as young as 13) so they can
attend class without the inconvenience of having to arrange for babysitters or
having family watch their kids. (OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK) I was ordered to spend $700,000 on my
department or risk losing funding for the upcoming year even though there was
little need for anything; my budget was already substantial. I ended up buying
new computers for the computer learning center, half of which, one month later,
have been carved with graffiti by the appreciative students who obviously feel
humbled and grateful to have a free education in America. (OUR TAX DOLLARS A T
WORK) I have had to intervene several
times for young and substitute teachers whose classes consist of many illegal
immigrant students here in the country less then 3 months who raised so much
hell with the female teachers, calling them "Putas" whores and
throwing things that the teachers were in tears. Free medical, free education, free food, day
care etc., etc., etc. Is it any wonder they feel entitled to not only be in
this country but to demand rights, privileges and entitlements? To those who
want to point out how much these illegal immigrants contribute to our society
because they LIKE their gardener and housekeeper and they like to pay less for
tomatoes: spend some time in the real world of illegal immigration and see the TRUE
costs.
*
FACTS ON THE “REAL LATINO AMERICA” OF MEXICAN OCCUPIED LOS
ANGELES:
1. "40% of all workers in L.A. County are working for
cash and not paying taxes. . . . This is because they are predominantly illegal
immigrants working without a green card."
2. "95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for
illegal aliens . . . "
3. "75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles
are illegal aliens."
4. "Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to
illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by
taxpayers."
5. "Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention
centers are Mexican nationals here illegally."
6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are
living in garages.
7. "The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los
Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border."
This is another "fact" spun from the 2004 op-ed by
Heather Mac Donald, whose article refers to a single Los Angeles gang and the
conjecture of an unnamed federal prosecutor.
8. "Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are
illegal."
immigrants.
9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking.
10. In L. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9
million speak Spanish.
*
Illegal immigrants drain the tax dollars
Congressional study shows illegal immigrants sap tax dollars
The Business Journal of Phoenix - by Ty Young Phoenix
Business Journal
A study by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office released
Tuesday backs up the view that undocumented immigrants sap more tax dollars
than they provide, especially in education, health care and law enforcement.
The study pulled together reports from the past five years,
using data from sources including the Pew Hispanic Center, the Rand Corp., the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security and various universities. The
Congressional study also incorporated facts from states, including Arizona, but
its authors acknowledged there was no aggregate estimate that could be applied
to the entire country.
The report says that in 1990, 90 percent of undocumented
immigrants primarily were in six states: California, Florida, Illinois, New
Jersey, New York and Texas.
By 2004, undocumented immigrants had increased tenfold in
other states, most notably Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee,
according to statistics from the Pew Hispanic Center.
The report estimates there are 12 million undocumented
immigrants nationwide. Of those, 60 percent are uninsured and 50 percent of the
children are uninsured. Again using 2004 statistics from the Pew Hispanic
Center the average income of undocumented immigrants was $27,400 while
Americans earned $47,800. The difference puts undocumented immigrants in a
lower tax bracket, thus reducing the amount of federal and state income taxes
generated.
The study also showed that while undocumented workers
represented just 5 percent of state and federal service costs, their tax
revenue did not offset the amount spent by government. The authors of the study
stated that, "the general consensus is that unauthorized immigrants impose
a net cost on state and local budgets. However, no agreement exists as to the
size of, or even the best way of measuring, that cost at a national
level."
In education, which the study notes is the largest single
expenditure in state and local budgets, multiple states reported 20 to 40
percent higher costs educating non-English speaking students, many of whom come
from the homes of undocumented immigrant parents. Using New Mexico statistics
from 2004 as a model, education spending on undocumented immigrants comprised
$67 million of the state's $3 billion education budget.
The study estimates there are 53.3 million school-age
children in the U.S., 2 million of whom are undocumented immigrants and another
3 million who are legal citizens, but whose parents are not.
Undocumented immigrants are more likely to access emergency
rooms and urgent care facilities because most do not have health care, the
study said. In Arizona and other border areas, states paid nearly $190 million
in health care costs for undocumented immigrants in 2000, the study reported.
The amount, which the study says likely has risen since then, represented
one-quarter of all uncompensated health care costs in those states that year.
While the report found that undocumented immigrants are less
likely to be incarcerated than American natives, it said states still bear a
large cost for the legal process. Based on a report from the U.S./Mexico Border
Counties Coalition from 2001, counties from the four states that border Mexico
spent more than $108 million on law enforcement activities involving
undocumented immigrants. San Diego County in California spent nearly half of
that, with more than $50 million going into law enforcement activities
involving undocumented immigrants.
LA RAZA IMPERIALISM
WE ARE PAYING FOR OUR OWN INVASION! THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION
AND WELFARE STATE NOT ONLY COST US OUR JOBS, BUT ALSO
“In his state of the union address to the Mexican nation,
Calderon established his imperialistic imperatives: "I have said that
Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is
Mexico. And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen
is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights."
*
"We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by
that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him." --- La
Raza early founders, Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez.
*
THE MEXICAN FASCIST POLITICAL PARTY OF LA RAZA… “THE
(MEXICAN) RACE”
LA RAZA OPERATES FOR THE EVER EXPANSION OF THE MEXICAN
WELFARE STATE, OPEN BORDERS, GRINGOS PAY FOR BIRTHING, WELFARE, AND MAKE UP FOR
THE ENORMOUS MEXICAN “TAX FREE” UNDERGROUND ECONOMY, WHICH IN LOS ANGELES
ALONE, IS MORE THAN $2 BILLION PER YEAR.
THIS IS LA RAZA:
The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is not only one of the
wealthiest and most politically powerful militant organizations in the country,
it is also notoriously racist and subversive. The group's name, "La
Raza," means "The Race," by which they are referring to ethnic
Mexicans, or more broadly to "hispanics" or "latinos." And
it is quite clear from their decades of vitriolic rhetoric — both spoken and
written — that the La Raza activists are trying to engender not only race
consciousness amongst hispanic U.S. citizens and Mexican migrants, but also
racial militancy and animosity toward "Gringo America."
The NCLR grew out of the La Raza Unida (The Race United)
Party and the Southwest Council of La Raza in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The key leaders were Marxist-Leninist followers of Fidel Castro and Che
Guevarra.
In 1970, the California Senate Fact-Finding Subcommittee on
Un-American Activities said this about La Raza Unida: "Its president is
Maclovio Barraza. Mr. Barraza has been identified by the Subversive Activities
Control Board as a member of the Communist Party, and presides over the Council
which recently received a grant of $1,300,000 from the Ford Foundation."
Maclovio Barraza was the NCLR Board of Directors' founding
Chairperson, and the NCLR continues to honor this hardcore Marxist by awarding
the Moclavio Barraza Award to its top activist each year.
One of the early founders of La Raza was Professor Jose Angel
Gutierrez, whose violent, extremist rhetoric has caused NCLR some public relations
problems. Back in 1969, Gutierrez said: "We have got to eliminate the
gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got
to kill him." He has continued to promote the same hateful
"reconquista" ideology ever since. But that didn't stop NCLR from
bestowing on him their "Hero Award" in 1994.
The radical student group MEChA (Moviemento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan), with which NCLR has been closely allied for several
decades, is even more explicitly and militantly, having adopted the slogan,
"Por La Raza Todo, Fuera de La Raza Nada," which translated means:
"For the Race, Everything; Outside the Race, Nothing."
MEChA's founding documents and literature are replete with
appeals to "La Raza de Bronce" (The Bronze Race) and condemnation of
the "brutal gringo." MEChA, as its name suggests, is also a leading
promoter of the radical "reconquista" (reconquest) movement, a plan
of to take over the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and
Texas — a region they refer to as "Aztlan" — which they claim was
stolen from the "Aztecan" peoples. NCLR provides major financial
support to MEChA and many of NCLR's leaders were MEChA leaders in their college
days.
NCLR: Agents for the Government of Mexico?
Especially troubling is NCLR's leading role in the Fundacion
Solidaridad Mexicano Americana (Foundation for Mexican-American Solidarity,
FSMA), an organization founded and funded by the government of Mexico and
directed by the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of Public
Education. Both of these ministries have been engaged in efforts aimed at
demanding full political rights for illegal aliens in the U.S. and
indoctrinating America's Hispanic population in radical, racist La Raza
ideology.
Top members of La Raza, MALDEF, the National Immigration
Forum and other leading immigration activist organizations also serve on the
Council of the FSMA. As such, they are acting as agents for a foreign power
that is actively seeking to influence our national, state, and local laws and
policies, in ways that are inimical to the interests of our nation and our
citizens. NCLR and these other participating groups should be investigated by
Congress to determine if they are breaking any laws, especially since these
organizations and/or their affiliates not only enjoy tax-exempt status, but
even receive millions of dollars from federal and state government agencies.*
OBAMA NOW OPERATES LA RAZA OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSES THROUGH LA
RAZA CECILIA MUNOZ!
OBAMA’S SEC. OF (ILLEGAL) LABOR IS A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER,
HILDA SOLIS!
OBAMA HAS SIGNIFICANTLY UPPED TAX PAYER FUNDING OF THE
MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! DID YOU VOTE FOR THIS FUNDING OF MEX
SUPREMACY?
*
HARRY REID’S STATE OF NEVADA IS NOW ONE-THIRD ILLEGALS! REID
IS CELEBRATED BY THE MEXICAN CONSULATE (LA RAZA HEADQUARTERS) FOR SELLING OUT
AMERICANS, AND HELP FUND THE LA RAZA OCCUPATION OF HIS STATE.
HARRY REID PUTS MONEY IN LA RAZA’S DIRTY HANDS!
25% OF THE POPULATION OF REID’S STATE ARE ILLEGALS. HIS BIG
GAMBLING PAYMASTERS HAVE TOLD REID “HELL NO, WE WON’T PAY LIVING WAGES TO
STUPID GRINGOS!”
*
New Stealth Federal Funding Bill for La Raza
Which brings us to an extraordinary matter of some urgency.
Several weeks before the White House and its Senate allies (MEXIFORNIA SENATORS
FEINSTEIN AND BOXER ARE BOTH LA RAZA DEMS! THEY PUSH FOR OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY,
NO E-VERIFY AND NO ID FOR ILLEGALS TO VOTE), announced their big
"breakthrough" legislation (S.1348), radicals in the House quietly
introduced legislation to pump $5 million directly into La Raza next year — and
$10 million per year for "each fiscal year thereafter."
(YOU MAY BE SERIOUS JOLTED BY THE KNOWLEDGE THAT NEARLY
ONE-QUARTER OF CONGRESS IS THE HISPANIC CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS --- LA RAZA
SUPREMACIST! MEXIFORNIA ALONE SENDS FOUR LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS TO WASHINGTON.
THESE ARE THE HIGHLY RACIST REPS. XAVIER BECERRA, JOE BACA, AND THE INFAMOUS LA
RAZA SISTERS, LINDA AND LORETTA SANCHEZ. FORMER LA RAZA CONGRESSWOMAN HILDA
SOLIS WAS SELECTED BY OBAMA AS SEC. OF (NOW ILLEGAL) LABOR, TO EASE MORE
ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS AND THEREBY KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR OBAMA’S WALL ST.
DONORS, AND TO BUY THE LA RAZA ILLEGALS’ VOTES!)
H. R. 1999, entitled the Hope Fund Act of 2007, should
truthfully be labeled the "Perpetual Funding of La Raza Radicals
Act."
It is being sponsored by Rep. Ruben Hinojosa (D-Tex.) and
Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.).
Since the bill [4] is rather short, we include the entire
text below:
To authorize appropriations for assistance for the National
Council of La Raza and the Raza Development Fund.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 23, 2007
Mr. HINOJOSA (for himself and Mr. RENZI) introduced the
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services
A BILL
To authorize appropriations for assistance for the National
Council of La Raza and the Raza Development Fund.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Hope Fund Act of 2007'.
SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA AND RAZA
DEVELOPMENT FUND.
(a) Use- The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
shall, to the extent amounts are made available pursuant to subsection (b),
make a grant to the National Council of La Raza for the purpose of providing
technical and financial assistance to local non-profit organizations to
undertake community development and affordable housing projects and programs
serving low- and moderate-income households, particularly through organizations
located in neighborhoods with substantial populations of income-disadvantaged
households of Hispanic origin. Assistance provided by the Secretary under this
section may be used by the National Council of La Raza or the Raza Development
Fund to--
(1) provide technical and financial assistance for site
acquisition and development, construction financing, and short- and long-term
financing for housing, community facilities, and economic development;
(2) leverage capital from private entities, including private
financial institutions, insurance companies, and private philanthropic
organizations;
(3) provide technical assistance, training, support, and
advice to develop the management, financial, and administrative capabilities of
housing development organizations serving low-income households, including
Hispanic households; and
(4) conduct such other activities as may be determined by the
Secretary and the National Council of La Raza.
(b) Authorization of Appropriations- There is authorized to
be appropriated for grants under this section--
(1) $5,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; and
(2) $10,000,000 for each fiscal year thereafter.
Although S.1348, the immigration bill, is far more important
and will have a much larger and more dramatically harmful impact than H.R.
1999, nevertheless, the La Raza funding bill is such blatant pork-barrel
pandering to an extremist, racist lobbying group, that it sends an unmistakable
message about what the "stakeholders" behind the Kennedy-Bush amnesty
are really after: more money, more power, more revolution — and the complete
destruction of our borders and security.
With millions more tax dollars in their political war chest,
they would become even more brazen in their demands. They know that this is a
volatile issue that could rouse the wrath of American voters. Which is why none
of the sponsors of the legislation have mentioned H.R. 1999 on their House web
sites, and why the NCLR has also kept mum about this planned political payoff.
But their dirty secret is out. If it is sufficiently exposed,
it can stir enough opposition not only to stop H.R. 1999, but also to defeat
S.1348 or any other amnesty "compromise" that comes out of the White
House-Congress immigration wheeling and dealing.
ACCORDING TO MEXIFORNIA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS, HALF THE
MURDERS IN MEX-INFESTED CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!
OF THE TOP MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CA, 186 ARE MEXICANS.
MOST OF THE REST RUSSIANS. YOU CAN THANK YOUR LA RAZA DEM FOR THEIR OPEN
BORDERS POLICY FOR THAT!
NOW GO TO THE LOS ANGELES TIMES FRONT PAGE, AND DO A SEARCH
FOR MEXICAN GANGS!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 11, 2008
In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has
adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary
zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its
rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third-nation neutral
arbitration of ....disputes concerning immigration laws and their
enforcement." We’ll have the story. Last year, Prince William County,
Virginia passed an initiative to allow local police to check the immigration
status of anyone in police custody. The county recently held its first
immigration training session for local police officers. We’ll have a look
inside the training. Mexican President Felipe Calderon is in New York today on
the first leg his five-day tour across America to meddle in immigration issues
in the United States. This is his first visit to the U.S. since he became
President in 2006, but he will not meet with President Bush or any of the
presidential candidates, who he has accused of spewing anti-immigrant rhetoric.
Join us for that report.
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
In his first state of
the union speech since becoming president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon criticized
the U.S. government and its efforts to shut down illegal immigration. During
the speech Calderon proclaimed that “Mexico does not end at its borders” and
that “where there is a Mexican, there is a Mexico.” Tune in for a full report
on Calderon’s vigorous fight to protect Mexican interests in the United
States—even when they’re built on illegal immigration.
“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast
majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country
saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social
development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly
treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact,
racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the
illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually
strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”
*
MEXICO’S SUPREMACY IN AMERICA
NEW YORK (CNN) -- Mexican President Felipe Calderon Sunday
demanded the United States surrender its sovereignty, abandon the rule of law
and accede to Mexico's inherent supremacy.
Lou Dobbs says Mexican President Felipe Calderon is showing
"blatant hypocrisy" on immigration.
In his state of the union address to the Mexican nation,
Calderon established his imperialistic imperatives: "I have said that
Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is
Mexico. And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen
is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights."
Calderon protested the U.S. government's increased raids on
illegal employers of illegal alien employees and work site enforcement. In what
is little more than a faint nod to the Bush administration's responsibility to
enforce U.S. immigration law, the Department of Homeland Security had planned
to send out notices to employers from the Social Security Administration
informing them of non-matching records between an employee's name and Social
Security number. These employers would then be forced to resolve any
discrepancy within 90 days or be required to dismiss the employee or face up to
$10,000 in fines for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.
But then, ethnocentric advocacy groups and some labor unions,
trying to bolster their membership, sued to stop the crackdown on hiring
illegal alien workers. A federal judge in California last week issued a
temporary restraining order blocking the plan, giving a victory to the AFL-CIO,
the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center, all
of which brought the suit alleging DHS exceeded its authority in making the
rule.
That U.S. District Court judge ruled as if she were an
employee of the Mexican government, rather than the U.S. government. Homeland
Security was simply enforcing existing immigration laws. Are we not a nation
that follows the rule of law? If not, we're no country at all.
Calderon must have been delighted by the judge's decision.
Calderon, like his predecessors, Carlos Salinas and Vicente Fox, has failed
miserably to establish policies that would create jobs for the Mexican people
and to eliminate shameful, unchecked corruption and incompetence in the Mexican
government.
*
MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORT BESIDES DRUGS, IS POVERTY, CRIMINALS
AND PREGNANT WOMEN!
Even by Mexico's standards, Calderon's blatant hypocrisy is
breathtaking. Calderon told the Washington Post more than a year ago that he
believes laws are not a relative concept, nor subject to a personal concept of
justice. Calderon declared a big difference between himself and his rival for
the Mexican presidency, Manuel Lopez Obrador, was this: "I believe in the rule
of law." Obviously he does not believe in the rule of U.S. law on U.S.
soil.
Calderon can't have it both ways. He cannot fail his citizens
at home and then act as the Great Imperialist Protector of his citizens who are
driven by poverty and corruption to enter the United States illegally. The
United States provides Mexico with an annual surplus of $65 billion in trade,
an estimated $25 billion in remittances from Mexican citizens living and
working here illegally, and at least another $25 billion generated by the
illegal drug trade across our southern border.
But it is President Bush and this Congress who should be most
embarrassed, because they are failing to assert rights for Americans in their
own country, rights far short of those demanded by Calderon for his citizens
living illegally in our nation.
*
LA RAZA – “THE (MEXICAN) RACE”….
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA
1126 16th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
202-785 1670
Get on La Raza’s email list to find out what this fascist
party is doing to expand the Mexican occupation. NCLR.org
FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE, AND MEXICAN
SUPREMACY
LA RAZA is the virulently racist political party for ILLEGALS
(only Mexicans) and the corporations that benefit from illegals, and the
employers of illegals. IT IS ILLEGAL TO HIRE AN ILLEGAL.
LA RAZA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA and has
contempt for AMERICANS, AMERICAN FREEDOM of SPEECH (DOES NOT EXIST IN
NARCOmex), AMERICAN LANGUAGE , AMERICAN BORDERS, AMERICAN FLAG. It was La Raza
that handed out hundreds of thousands of Mexican flags for the 2006 march by
illegals demanding surrender of our borders and amnesty.
LA RAZA does like the AMERICAN WELFARE SYSTEM. The welfare
system in the country is so good that Mexico has dumped 38 million of their
poor, illiterate , criminal and frequently pregnant over our border.
EXAMPLES OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH:
THERE IS NOTHING MORE RACIST THAN A MEXICAN! THEY ARE THE
MOST RACIST IN THE HEMISPHERE. LA RAZA “THE RACE”
School Board Member Chastised Over “Anchor Babies”
Last Updated: Fri, 04/09/2010 - 11:20am
An elected official in southern California has been asked to
resign for referring to the American-born children of illegal immigrants as
“anchor babies,” a derogatory and dehumanizing term, according to the Latino
rights advocates calling for the ouster.
The Fontana Unified School District member, Kathy Binks, used
the term during a recent board meeting, igniting fury among the area’s
immigration advocates who quickly accused the veteran trustee of denigrating
the offspring of illegal aliens. Binks has served in the public school
district, located about 50 miles east of Los Angeles, for more than two decades
and is known as a dedicated child advocate.
(LA RAZA PARTY BARBARA CHAVEZ
- HERE’S REALITY TO CHAVEZ’S RACISM:
HOPING THE BORDER PREGNANT MEANS “FREE” BIRTHING AND THEN 18
YEARS OF WELFARE. WHILE THESE WOMAN BIRTH “LEGALS” BY LAW, THE CHILD WILL BE RAISED MEXICAN, AND TO HAVE THE
RACIST CONTEMPT FOR AMERICANS, LOATHE ENGLISH, LITERACY, AND BE GANG MEMBERS.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO LA
RAZA!!! )
During a recent meeting a fellow school board member (Barbara
Chavez), who is a renowned Latino rights advocate, complained that the district
somehow treats the children of illegal aliens like immigrants even though
they’re American citizens by birth. Chavez said it irritates her because the
children are American and “this is their world, this is their country.”
Here is where the “highly offensive” comment from Binks comes
in. Acknowledging Chavez’s remarks, Binks said: “Oh, I know that, they’re
anchor babies.” Accusing Binks of being racially insensitive, the area’s
influential immigration advocates have posted the exchange on YouTube and called
for her resignation.
APPALLED AND AGHAST??? WHERE ARE THESE LA RAZA MEXICANS WHEN
MEXICAN GANGS ARE MURDERING PEOPLE?
The president of the local chapter of a national group
dedicated to combating discrimination against Mexicans (League of United Latin
American Citizens or LULAC) said he was “appalled” and “aghast” that such
comments are still being used, pointing out that “we’re all sort of anchor
babies no matter what country we came from.”
Binks has apologized but refuses to end her lengthy career in
education over a phrase that is widely accepted to identify kids born in this
country to those who live in it illegally. She has, however, agreed to work
with a community program that promotes tolerance and compassion.
La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video
in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US citizens to
Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to transform America.
The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor
Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the
figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is
approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year.
The video below depicts the many
faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation". The video includes a
fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school children in Santa Ana,
California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The video ends with a now
famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the University of Texas
at Austin.
WHY ISN’T MEDIA SPLASHING THIS ALL OVER THE NATION? Perhaps
because Americans think their government would protect them from an invasion.
OUR GOVERNMENT IS PARTNERED WITH LA RAZA AND ITS AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, NO
WALL, ENDLESS DREAM ACTS WELFARE, NO I.D. TO VOTE, NO E-VERIFY, AND SANCTUARY
CITIES ALL OVER THE NATION WHERE LAWS DON’T APPLY TO LA RAZA!
from the May 28, 2009 edition -
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard
about the high number of Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
PALO ALTO, CALIF.
President Obama has encouraged
Americans to start laying a new foundation for the country – on a number of
fronts. He has stressed that we'll need to have the courage to make some hard
choices. One of those hard choices is how to handle immigration. The US must
get serious about the tide of legal and illegal immigrants, above all from
Latin America.
It's not just a short-run issue of
immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment approaches 10
percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of healthcare. Heavy
immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as a nation.
The political realities of the
rapidly growing Latino population are such that Mr. Obama may be the last
president who can avert the permanent, vast underclass implied by the current
Census Bureau projection for 2050.
Mexico: Where Is Your Shame?
At a demonstration Wednesday in Mexico City against Arizona's
law.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Immigration: Mexico's government gloated triumphantly after a
federal judge's injunction blocked Arizona's immigration law. But it's no
victory for Mexico. In fact, Mexico's leaders ought to be mortified.
As radical immigration activists crowed with glee and the
Obama administration claimed victory, Mexico's government joined the applause.
Calling Judge Susan Bolton's injunction Wednesday "a
step in the right direction," Mexican Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa
declared: "The government of Mexico would like to express its recognition
for the determination demonstrated by the federal government of the United
States and the actions of the civil organizations that organized lawsuits
against the SB 1070 law."
In reality, it ought to be ashamed. Supposedly framed as an
issue of federal power pre-empting state power, it's hardly Mexico's business.
But Mexico made a big show of saying its interest was in protecting its
nationals from the dreadful racism of Arizona that its own citizens, curiously
enough, keep fleeing to.
Espinosa said her government was busy collecting data on
civil rights violations and her department had issued an all-out travel warning
to Mexican nationals about Arizona.
That's where Mexico's hypocrisy is just too much.
First, Mexico encourages illegal immigration to the U.S. Oh,
it says it doesn't, but it prints comic book guides for would-be illegal
immigrants and provides ID cards for illegals once they get here. In Arizona
alone, Mexico keeps five consulates busy.
That's not out of love
for its own citizens, but because Mexicans send cash back to Mexico that helps
finance the government.
Instead of selling its wasteful state-owned oil company or
getting rid of red tape to create jobs in Mexico, Mexico spends the hard
currency from remittances. It fails to look at why its citizens leave.
According to the Heritage Foundation-Wall Street Journal 2010
Index of Economic Freedom, Mexico's big problem is — no shock — government
corruption, where it ranks below the world average.
That's where Mexico's
cartels come in.
Mexico's encouragement of illegal immigration undercuts its
valiant war against its smuggling cartels. The cartels' prowess and firepower
have made them the only ones who can smuggle effectively across the border.
U.S. law enforcers say they now control human-smuggling on our southern border.
Feed them immigrants and they grow more cash-rich — and right
now, immigrant smuggling is about a third of the cartels' income.
Mass graves and car bombings are signs of criminal
organizations getting bigger, and more powerful. Juarez, which has lost 5,000
people this year, bleeds because cartels fight over not just who gets the drug
routes, but who gets the illegal-immigrant smuggling routes, too.
Aside from the cartel mayhem in Mexico, the bodies are piling
up in the Arizona desert and U.S. Border Patrol rescues of abandoned illegals
left to die have risen.
It's not the desert's
fault, and it's certainly not Uncle Sam's fault, as activists claim. No, it's
the fact that Mexicans are encouraged to emigrate. Criminal cartels don't fear
abandoning their human cargo in the desert, as long as Mexico does nothing and
blames Uncle Sam.
Hearing Mexico's government now cheer the Arizona ruling,
which will only encourage more illegal immigration, gives the country's regime
a pretty inhuman face.
If Mexico had any decency, it would do all it could to
discourage illegal immigration and keep a respectful silence about Arizona.
(MEXICO IS FULLY AWARE THAT OBAMA HAS SUED ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA
PARTY BASE!)
It needs U.S. support for its war on cartels. Instead of insulting
American citizens, Mexico should confront directly the reasons why its people
are so desperate to leave, and do all in its power to destroy the cartels that
are slowly killing the nation. That includes defunding the murderous gangs by
halting illegal immigration.
Mexico: Where Is Your Shame?
Posted 07/29/2010 06:58 PM ET
At a demonstration Wednesday in Mexico City against Arizona's
law.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Immigration: Mexico's government gloated triumphantly after a
federal judge's injunction blocked Arizona's immigration law. But it's no
victory for Mexico. In fact, Mexico's leaders ought to be mortified.
As radical immigration activists crowed with
glee and the Obama administration claimed victory, Mexico's government joined
the applause.
Calling Judge Susan Bolton's injunction Wednesday "a step
in the right direction," Mexican Foreign Minister Patricia Espinosa
declared: "The government of Mexico would like to express its recognition
for the determination demonstrated by the federal government of the United
States and the actions of the civil organizations that organized lawsuits
against the SB 1070 law."
In reality, it ought to be ashamed.
Supposedly framed as an issue of federal power pre-empting state power, it's
hardly Mexico's business. But Mexico made a big show of saying its interest was
in protecting its nationals from the dreadful racism of Arizona that its own
citizens, curiously enough, keep fleeing to.
Espinosa said her government was busy collecting data on civil
rights violations and her department had issued an all-out travel warning to
Mexican nationals about Arizona.
That's where Mexico's hypocrisy is just too much.
First, Mexico encourages illegal immigration
to the U.S. Oh, it says it doesn't, but it prints comic book guides for
would-be illegal immigrants and provides ID cards for illegals once they get
here. In Arizona alone, Mexico keeps five consulates busy.
That's not out of love for its own citizens, but because
Mexicans send cash back to Mexico that helps finance the government.
Instead of selling its wasteful state-owned oil company or
getting rid of red tape to create jobs in Mexico, Mexico spends the hard
currency from remittances. It fails to look at why its citizens leave.
According to the Heritage Foundation-Wall
Street Journal 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Mexico's big problem is — no
shock — government
corruption, where it
ranks below the world average.
That's where Mexico's cartels come in.
Mexico's encouragement of illegal immigration undercuts its
valiant war against its smuggling cartels. The cartels' prowess and firepower
have made them the only ones who can smuggle effectively across the border.
U.S. law enforcers say they now control human-smuggling on our southern border.
Feed them immigrants and they grow more
cash-rich — and right now, immigrant smuggling is about a third of the cartels'
income.
Mass graves and car bombings are signs of criminal organizations
getting bigger, and more powerful. Juarez, which has lost 5,000 people this year,
bleeds because cartels fight over not just who gets the drug routes, but who
gets the illegal-immigrant smuggling routes, too.
Aside from the cartel mayhem in Mexico, the
bodies are piling up in the Arizona desert and U.S. Border Patrol rescues of abandoned
illegals left to die have risen.
It's not the desert's fault, and it's certainly not
Uncle Sam's fault, as activists claim. No, it's the fact that Mexicans are
encouraged to emigrate. Criminal cartels don't fear abandoning their human
cargo in the desert, as long as Mexico does nothing and blames Uncle Sam.
Hearing Mexico's government now cheer the
Arizona ruling, which will only encourage more illegal immigration, gives the
country's regime a pretty inhuman face.
If Mexico had any decency, it would do all it
could to discourage illegal immigration and keep a respectful silence about
Arizona. (MEXICO IS FULLY AWARE THAT OBAMA HAS SUED ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF HIS LA
RAZA PARTY BASE!)
It needs U.S. support for its war on cartels. Instead of insulting
American citizens, Mexico should confront directly the reasons why its people
are so desperate to leave, and do all in its power to destroy the cartels that
are slowly killing the nation. That includes defunding the murderous gangs by
halting illegal immigration.
Mexican government forces out over 1,000 immigration officials accused of corruption
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - The Mexican government has forced the resignation or sidelined more than 1,000 immigration officials over allegations of corruption and other irregularities, a senior official said on Friday.
As part of an administrative modernization plan, the National Migration Institute (INM) installed video surveillance systems at its offices that have since detected irregularities that ranged from immigration officials extorting migrants, to workers sleeping on the job.
INM chief Francisco Garduno said "more than 1,040 INM public servants have had to resign or have been subject to an internal review. The majority have resigned because we have a video camera system at all our stations."
The videos show alleged acts of extortion and corruption, he said.
Tens of thousands of migrants, mostly escaping rampant violence and entrenched poverty in Central America, traverse Mexico every year in an attempt to reach the U.S. border. Along the way, many fall victim to organized crime and are kidnapped or killed.
Human rights organizations say the migrants are also preyed upon by corrupt public servants that extort them.
President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has made rooting out corruption one of the cornerstones of his administration.