Friday, November 1, 2013

ARE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SICK OF OBAMA'S CON JOBS? Poll: Obama Approval 41%, Disapproval 51% | CNS News

Poll: Obama Approval 41%, Disapproval 51% | CNS News

The lies, spin and then more lies… THAT IS OBAMA’S STAGED “HOPE and CHANGE” performance after performance. He’s simply a fraudster… George Bush’s THIRD and FOURTH TERMS!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/10/crony-capitalism-how-barack-obama-lied.html


for Obama, it's all about staging the LIES and then SPINNING them in every direction but the truth!

BARACK OBAMA, LA RAZA FASCISM and the CULTURE of DEM CORRUPTION

They Destroyed Our Country

“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”

more at this link

THE OBAMA ASSAULT: Obamacare Spiraling Downward | CNS News

Obamacare Spiraling Downward | CNS News

In health care mess, Obama reaps what he sowed | WashingtonExaminer.com

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population


OBAMA – THE SOCIOPATH BANKSTERS FUNDED AND ILLEGALS REELECTED.


OBAMA IS A SOCIOPATH. HE CAN LIE OUT OF HIS BIG MOUTH ABOUT ANYTHING AND THEN GO SERVE HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS AND LA RAZA!


But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows something that is a troublesome sign for the White House. Only 30 percent of Americans believe that the president “cares a lot” about “the needs and problems of people” like themselves.

On fifth anniversary of Wall Street crash, Obama tries the Big Lie technique


17 September 2013

 

On Monday, US President Barack Obama marked the fifth anniversary of the Wall Street crash of September 15, 2008 with a White House speech that only underscored the unbridgeable chasm that separates the entire political establishment from the broad mass of working people.

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/crony-capitalism-obama-celebrates-5.html

 
Forbes magazine reported that the wealth of the 400 richest Americans had climbed to $2 trillion, a jump from $1.7 trillion in 2012.

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population

1 November 2013
The inauguration of the private health care exchanges as part of the Affordable Care Act this past month has set off a political crisis for the Obama administration. Underlying the immediate issue of the failure of the new web site is the character of Obamacare itself—an attack on health care cloaked in the guise of “reform,” whose basic aim is to slash health care spending and shift a greater cost burden onto the backs of individuals.

From the beginning, cutting health care spending has been the central motivation of discussions over the Obama administration’s main domestic initiative. This was to be done by requiring individuals to purchase private insurance or face a penalty, thereby allowing corporations and governments to eliminate their own health care programs and leave individuals at the mercy of private insurers’ profit interests. Just as the health care overhaul goes into effect, bipartisan discussions are underway to slash hundreds of billions more from Medicare and Social Security.

Underlying the entire discussion in the political establishment is a basic concern of the American ruling class, a concern that is generally left unstated—namely, that people in the end are simply living too long. The advances of modern medicine have extended lives, often significantly beyond the age of retirement.

For the political strategists of the corporate and financial elite, these years of retirement and medical care are not seen as a good, but as a source of costs that must be slashed, so that they can take that money. This is to be accomplished either by raising the retirement age, by lowering life expectancy so that people die earlier, or both.

Two recent policy papers from the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a Washington-based think tank with close ties to the US military-intelligence agencies and both big business parties, give a sense of the discussions taking place behind the scenes.

One paper, “The Global Aging Preparedness Index” (GAP Index), examines the impact of the “stunning demographic transformation” caused by rising lifespans in the US and internationally. The second paper, “The Budget Crisis and the Civil-Military Challenge to National Security Spending,” is written by Anthony H. Cordesman, a longtime CSIS strategist who acts as a consultant for the US State and Defense departments.

The first study states that the US would rate much higher on the “GAP Index” if not for the “extraordinarily rapid rate of growth in health-care spending”, particularly for the aging population. The authors divide the older population into two categories: “young elderly,” ages 60-69, and “old elderly,” 70 and beyond. They maintain that because people are living longer, the “young elderly” are not truly “old age” and should not be allowed to retire “early” and bilk the system.

The solution? Raise the retirement age for Social Security—and, by implication, eligibility for Medicare—and force these supposedly “young elderly” to continue working. The Obama administration has indicated its support for such measures, which are part of the ongoing discussion between the two parties in Washington.

To bolster their argument, the CSIS authors helpfully suggest that working into old age “is not only good for the health of the budget and the economy, but according to most gerontologists it is also good for the health of the elderly themselves.” The modern-day phenomenon of elderly workers competing for minimum-wage jobs because their pensions have been slashed or eliminated turns out to be…a boon to good health.

In his paper, written from the standpoint of the military-intelligence apparatus, Cordesman states: “The US does not face any foreign threat as serious as its failure to come to grips with…the rise in the cost of federal entitlement spending.” He argues that the growth of the federal deficit and debt are driven “almost exclusively by the rise in federal spending on major health care programs, Social Security, and cost of net interest on the debt.”

Cordesman bemoans that as the population grows older, seniors are sapping vital resources as they seek treatment for dementia, heart disease, and cancer. By implication, something must be done to rein this in, especially if the United States is to address Cordesman’s main priority—maintaining the current exorbitant spending on wars and the US military.

Both documents claim that the great divide in society is between the “young” and the “old,” and that by swallowing up a disproportionate share of the national wealth, the elderly are placing the younger generation in danger.

This is a cynical lie. The central danger to American society is the capitalist system, which entails the unrestrained plundering of the working class by a narrow and parasitic ruling elite whose escalating wealth and campaigns of military aggression are bleeding society white.

The elderly, the vast majority of whom struggle to survive on Social Security and dwindling retirement accounts, are denounced as leeches on society, while the wealth of the super-rich grows to unprecedented levels. Though the combined pay of the top 10 highest paid CEOs in the US was $4.7 billion last year alone, the representatives of the ruling class demand that workers’ retirement age be raised and health care spending slashed.

It is such considerations that underlie Obamacare and the broader framework of the health care “debate,” aimed at setting up an even more heavily class-based system, in which most people receive substandard care while the rich can afford the most modern medicines and procedures.

And it is such considerations that have motivated the campaign from the news media, and particularly the New York Times, to restrict supposedly “unnecessary” medical treatment for ordinary people.
That the representatives of the corporate and financial elite see the growth in life expectancy and improved health in old age—standard measures of an advancing society—as a positive evil is in itself a damning indictment of their policies and of the capitalist system that they defend.

Kate Randall

the figures are in on Obama’s looting of America for Wall Street!

STAGGERING POVERTY IN AMERICA CAUSED BY OBAMA, HIS CRONIES AND WALL STREET DONORS…AND THEN ILLEGALS GET THE JOBS!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/obamanomics-and-obamas-crony-capitalism.html


According to a new report by University of California Berkeley Professor Emmanuel Saez, the gulf between the wealthy and the rest of society has sharply expanded under Obama. The richest one percent now monopolize more than 22 percent of all household income in America. The richest ten percent of the population now control more than half of the nation’s income, 50.4 percent—the highest proportion since the government began collecting income statistics in 1917.

Since 2009, the richest one percent has captured a staggering 95 percent of all income gains. The class war policies of the government—including bank bailouts, “quantitative easing” and an attack on wage and benefits for the working class—have led to a 31.4 percent rise in income for the top one percent. The wealthy have more than recovered the losses that came from the Wall Street collapse of 2008.

Meanwhile, the bottom 99 percent has seen a negligible 0.4 percent rise in income. Tens of millions of workers—who never recovered from the record household income drop of 2007 to 2009—continue to reel from the effects of mass job losses, falling wages, home foreclosures, indebtedness and social service cuts.


OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA BLANKET AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.




In fact, real median household income dropped in every year of Obama's first term. In 2008, when he was elected, it was $53,644. In 2009, the year he was inaugurated, it dropped to 53,285. In 2010, his second year in office, it dropped to $51,892. In 2011, his third year in office, it dropped to $51,100. And, in 2012, his fourth year in office, it dropped to $51,017. At the same time the number of people living in poverty in the United States increased. In 2008, according to the Census Bureau, there were approximately 39,829,000 people living in poverty in this country. In 2012, there were 46,496,000. That is an increase of approximately 6,667,000—of 16.73 percent—from 2008 to 2012.


 
SHUTDOWN… BUT NO CESSATION OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING 
JUST AS THE AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO'S LOOTING IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH AND ENDLESS FLOW OF MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS, SO IS THIS SHUTDOWN SIMPLY ONE MORE ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS ALREADY DECIMATED BY WALL STREET'S LOOTING AND ALL JOBS GOING TO LA RAZA!
 
“There are growing indications that, as with previous artificially engineered government crises, a phony war between the two corporate-controlled parties is being used to escalate the relentless and very real war against the living standards of the working class.”
 
 

Churches Called to Remember, Pray for Persecuted Believers | CNS News

Churches Called to Remember, Pray for Persecuted Believers | CNS News

AS OBAMA SABOTAGES HOMELAND SECURITY TO BUILD THE LA RAZA DEM PARTY OF ILLEGALS - Feds Threaten to Prosecute Merchant for Selling ‘Department of Homeland Stupidity’ Coffee Mugs | CNS News

Feds Threaten to Prosecute Merchant for Selling ‘Department of Homeland Stupidity’ Coffee Mugs | CNS News


 “What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” ...CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

 

… BUT OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA BLANKET AMNESTY or CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT!

 

Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't want to enforce immigration

AUSTIN FIREFIGHTERS MATT HARVEY and MICHAEL COOPER SAVE DOG FROM FLOOD

'We don't just rescue two-legged victims': Touching moment firefighters save dog from flood waters

By Ashley Collman
|
Two firefighters with the Austin Fire Department were pictured saving a dog from flood waters in central Texas yesterday.
The department posted the picture of firefighters Matt Harvey and Michael Cooper with the animal to their Facebook page, saying:  'We don't just rescue two-legged victims...we love our four legged friends as well.
The animal looks like it's been through a lot, and clings to one of the firefighters as if they're hugging.
Firefighters' furry friend: Firefighters Matt Harvey and Michael Cooper of the Austin Fire Department are pictured rescuing a dog from a flash flood yesterday in central Texas
Firefighters' furry friend: Firefighters Matt Harvey and Michael Cooper of the Austin Fire Department are pictured rescuing a dog from a flash flood yesterday in central Texas

Since posting the image, the picture has gathered more than 2,000 likes on Facebook and many animal-lovers expressed their gratitude to the firefighters in the comments section.
More than a foot of rain fell on Wednesday and Thursday in central Texas which triggered flash flooding in the area. Two neighborhoods were mandatorily evacuated and 500 homes were swamped by the flood waters.
Overflowing: More than a foot of rain fell in the central Texas region between Wednesday and Thursday, sparking flash floods through the area
Overflowing: More than a foot of rain fell in the central Texas region between Wednesday and Thursday, sparking flash floods through the area
Overflowing: More than a foot of rain fell in the central Texas region between Wednesday and Thursday, sparking flash floods through the area

Rescued: Two neighborhoods in Austin were put on mandatory evacuation yesterday. Above, Isabel Rodriguez and her children Christoper, 3 (left), and Rubi, 8 months (right), are carried on a boat on Quicksilver Road after their home was flooded on Thursday
Rescued: Two neighborhoods in Austin were put on mandatory evacuation yesterday. Above, Isabel Rodriguez and her children Christoper, 3 (left), and Rubi, 8 months (right), are carried on a boat on Quicksilver Road after their home was flooded on Thursday

Up: During a new conference yesterday, Austin City Manager Marc Ott said that some people had to cut holes through their rooftops just to have access to the outside. Above, a family is rescued from the top of their home in southeast Austin yesterday
Up: During a new conference yesterday, Austin City Manager Marc Ott said that some people had to cut holes through their rooftops just to have access to the outside. Above, a family is rescued from the top of their home in southeast Austin yesterday


'We saw very significant flooding,' City Manager Marc Ott said at news conference yesterday. 'In some cases people cut holes through rooftops to have access to the outside.'
Two men were killed in the flooding. One man 50 to 60 years old was found in Onion Creek while another man died driving on a flooded road.
The storm system had shifted out of Austin and to the east by Thursday morning. As of Friday, the city was beginning to access the damage.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2483436/We-dont-just-rescue-legged-victims-Touching-moment-firefighters-save-dog-flood-waters.html#ixzz2jP5LwoUM
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

OBAMA and MEXICO VOW TO ELECT MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST! White House eyes 2014 midterms in push for immigration reform | WashingtonExaminer.com

White House eyes 2014 midterms in push for immigration reform | WashingtonExaminer.com


you, legal, are a stupid idiot if you think Mexicans are not out there voting for LA RAZA SUPREMACY over legals… they’re out there breaking every law in the land, frequently by invitation of the DEMOCRAT PARTY!

“WE WILL TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY (U.S.) BY VOTE IF POSSIBLE AND VIOLENCE IF NECESSARY!”

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


MEXICAN FASCISM IN AMERICA:

Agendas of MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF, and Southwest Voter Registration Projects

These are transcripts of live, recorded statements by elected U.S. politicians, college professors, and pro-illegal alien activists whose objective is to take control of our country "by vote if possible and violence if necessary!" 1. Armando Navarro, Prof. Ethnic Studies, UC Riverside at Latino Summit Response to Prop 187, UC Riverside, 1/1995

 
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE” Obama-funded Mexican fascism in our borders!

 

by Michelle Malkin 
 


 
"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  --- Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico


WHAT THE HELL, WE ALL KNOW LA RAZA IS VOTING FOR LA RAZA DEMS NATIONWIDE. . . THEY DRIVE ILLEGALLY, STEAL OUR JOBS WITH POCKETS FULL OF PHONY ID'S, CONTRACT ILLEGALLY, GET WELFARE ILLEGALLY. . . only a gringo fool would believe the Mexicans are respectful of our voting laws. . . they're no more respectful of our voting laws that Obama!

THE OBAMA - HOLDER REGIME EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN TEXAS - ILLEGALS NO ID to VOTE! Government to sue Texas over voter ID law

Government to sue Texas over voter ID law... LA RAZA SAYS NO IDs REQUIRED TO VOTE DEM!!!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-obama-holder-regime-expand-la-raza.html


In health care mess, Obama reaps what he sowed | WashingtonExaminer.com

In health care mess, Obama reaps what he sowed | WashingtonExaminer.com

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population


OBAMA – THE SOCIOPATH BANKSTERS FUNDED AND ILLEGALS REELECTED.


OBAMA IS A SOCIOPATH. HE CAN LIE OUT OF HIS BIG MOUTH ABOUT ANYTHING AND THEN GO SERVE HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS AND LA RAZA!


But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows something that is a troublesome sign for the White House. Only 30 percent of Americans believe that the president “cares a lot” about “the needs and problems of people” like themselves.

On fifth anniversary of Wall Street crash, Obama tries the Big Lie technique


17 September 2013

 

On Monday, US President Barack Obama marked the fifth anniversary of the Wall Street crash of September 15, 2008 with a White House speech that only underscored the unbridgeable chasm that separates the entire political establishment from the broad mass of working people.

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/crony-capitalism-obama-celebrates-5.html

 
Forbes magazine reported that the wealth of the 400 richest Americans had climbed to $2 trillion, a jump from $1.7 trillion in 2012.

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population

1 November 2013
The inauguration of the private health care exchanges as part of the Affordable Care Act this past month has set off a political crisis for the Obama administration. Underlying the immediate issue of the failure of the new web site is the character of Obamacare itself—an attack on health care cloaked in the guise of “reform,” whose basic aim is to slash health care spending and shift a greater cost burden onto the backs of individuals.

From the beginning, cutting health care spending has been the central motivation of discussions over the Obama administration’s main domestic initiative. This was to be done by requiring individuals to purchase private insurance or face a penalty, thereby allowing corporations and governments to eliminate their own health care programs and leave individuals at the mercy of private insurers’ profit interests. Just as the health care overhaul goes into effect, bipartisan discussions are underway to slash hundreds of billions more from Medicare and Social Security.

Underlying the entire discussion in the political establishment is a basic concern of the American ruling class, a concern that is generally left unstated—namely, that people in the end are simply living too long. The advances of modern medicine have extended lives, often significantly beyond the age of retirement.

For the political strategists of the corporate and financial elite, these years of retirement and medical care are not seen as a good, but as a source of costs that must be slashed, so that they can take that money. This is to be accomplished either by raising the retirement age, by lowering life expectancy so that people die earlier, or both.

Two recent policy papers from the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a Washington-based think tank with close ties to the US military-intelligence agencies and both big business parties, give a sense of the discussions taking place behind the scenes.

One paper, “The Global Aging Preparedness Index” (GAP Index), examines the impact of the “stunning demographic transformation” caused by rising lifespans in the US and internationally. The second paper, “The Budget Crisis and the Civil-Military Challenge to National Security Spending,” is written by Anthony H. Cordesman, a longtime CSIS strategist who acts as a consultant for the US State and Defense departments.

The first study states that the US would rate much higher on the “GAP Index” if not for the “extraordinarily rapid rate of growth in health-care spending”, particularly for the aging population. The authors divide the older population into two categories: “young elderly,” ages 60-69, and “old elderly,” 70 and beyond. They maintain that because people are living longer, the “young elderly” are not truly “old age” and should not be allowed to retire “early” and bilk the system.

The solution? Raise the retirement age for Social Security—and, by implication, eligibility for Medicare—and force these supposedly “young elderly” to continue working. The Obama administration has indicated its support for such measures, which are part of the ongoing discussion between the two parties in Washington.

To bolster their argument, the CSIS authors helpfully suggest that working into old age “is not only good for the health of the budget and the economy, but according to most gerontologists it is also good for the health of the elderly themselves.” The modern-day phenomenon of elderly workers competing for minimum-wage jobs because their pensions have been slashed or eliminated turns out to be…a boon to good health.

In his paper, written from the standpoint of the military-intelligence apparatus, Cordesman states: “The US does not face any foreign threat as serious as its failure to come to grips with…the rise in the cost of federal entitlement spending.” He argues that the growth of the federal deficit and debt are driven “almost exclusively by the rise in federal spending on major health care programs, Social Security, and cost of net interest on the debt.”

Cordesman bemoans that as the population grows older, seniors are sapping vital resources as they seek treatment for dementia, heart disease, and cancer. By implication, something must be done to rein this in, especially if the United States is to address Cordesman’s main priority—maintaining the current exorbitant spending on wars and the US military.

Both documents claim that the great divide in society is between the “young” and the “old,” and that by swallowing up a disproportionate share of the national wealth, the elderly are placing the younger generation in danger.

This is a cynical lie. The central danger to American society is the capitalist system, which entails the unrestrained plundering of the working class by a narrow and parasitic ruling elite whose escalating wealth and campaigns of military aggression are bleeding society white.

The elderly, the vast majority of whom struggle to survive on Social Security and dwindling retirement accounts, are denounced as leeches on society, while the wealth of the super-rich grows to unprecedented levels. Though the combined pay of the top 10 highest paid CEOs in the US was $4.7 billion last year alone, the representatives of the ruling class demand that workers’ retirement age be raised and health care spending slashed.

It is such considerations that underlie Obamacare and the broader framework of the health care “debate,” aimed at setting up an even more heavily class-based system, in which most people receive substandard care while the rich can afford the most modern medicines and procedures.

And it is such considerations that have motivated the campaign from the news media, and particularly the New York Times, to restrict supposedly “unnecessary” medical treatment for ordinary people.
That the representatives of the corporate and financial elite see the growth in life expectancy and improved health in old age—standard measures of an advancing society—as a positive evil is in itself a damning indictment of their policies and of the capitalist system that they defend.

Kate Randall

the figures are in on Obama’s looting of America for Wall Street!

STAGGERING POVERTY IN AMERICA CAUSED BY OBAMA, HIS CRONIES AND WALL STREET DONORS…AND THEN ILLEGALS GET THE JOBS!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/obamanomics-and-obamas-crony-capitalism.html


According to a new report by University of California Berkeley Professor Emmanuel Saez, the gulf between the wealthy and the rest of society has sharply expanded under Obama. The richest one percent now monopolize more than 22 percent of all household income in America. The richest ten percent of the population now control more than half of the nation’s income, 50.4 percent—the highest proportion since the government began collecting income statistics in 1917.

Since 2009, the richest one percent has captured a staggering 95 percent of all income gains. The class war policies of the government—including bank bailouts, “quantitative easing” and an attack on wage and benefits for the working class—have led to a 31.4 percent rise in income for the top one percent. The wealthy have more than recovered the losses that came from the Wall Street collapse of 2008.

Meanwhile, the bottom 99 percent has seen a negligible 0.4 percent rise in income. Tens of millions of workers—who never recovered from the record household income drop of 2007 to 2009—continue to reel from the effects of mass job losses, falling wages, home foreclosures, indebtedness and social service cuts.


OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA BLANKET AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.


In fact, real median household income dropped in every year of Obama's first term. In 2008, when he was elected, it was $53,644. In 2009, the year he was inaugurated, it dropped to 53,285. In 2010, his second year in office, it dropped to $51,892. In 2011, his third year in office, it dropped to $51,100. And, in 2012, his fourth year in office, it dropped to $51,017. At the same time the number of people living in poverty in the United States increased. In 2008, according to the Census Bureau, there were approximately 39,829,000 people living in poverty in this country. In 2012, there were 46,496,000. That is an increase of approximately 6,667,000—of 16.73 percent—from 2008 to 2012.


 
SHUTDOWN… BUT NO CESSATION OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING 
JUST AS THE AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO'S LOOTING IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH AND ENDLESS FLOW OF MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS, SO IS THIS SHUTDOWN SIMPLY ONE MORE ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS ALREADY DECIMATED BY WALL STREET'S LOOTING AND ALL JOBS GOING TO LA RAZA!
 
“There are growing indications that, as with previous artificially engineered government crises, a phony war between the two corporate-controlled parties is being used to escalate the relentless and very real war against the living standards of the working class.”

 
 

 

POVERY IN AMERICA SPREADS - AS DOES THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE - Pennsylvania governor seeks to cut Medicaid benefits

Pennsylvania governor seeks to cut Medicaid benefits


One in four Pennsylvania workers earn poverty wages

OBAMAnomics:

 

"The politicians don’t care about the working and young people. We have billions in student loan debts, but they don’t help us, but they give billions to the wealthy."

 

By Douglas Lyons
2 September 2013

One in four Pennsylvanian workers, and two out of three workers under 24, are paid poverty wages according to a recent report released by the Keystone Research Center.


IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA, 25% OF THE POPULATION LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL AND MORE THAN HALF OF ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. YOUR STATE…???

POVERTY IN THE BURBS…you are next and an illegal is next in your job!

OBAMAnomics at work: SOARING RICHES FOR THE 1%, SOARING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR AMERICANS (LEGALS), SOARING PROFITS and CRIMES FOR OBAMA’S BANKSTER DONORS and SOARING TAXES TO PAY FOR MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!

Much of the rise in suburban poverty is due to the impoverishment of working families already living there. The decline in manufacturing, the Great Recession, and widespread foreclosures have left many longtime suburban families reeling


Much of the rise in suburban poverty is due to the impoverishment of working families already living there. The decline in manufacturing, the Great Recession, and widespread foreclosures have left many longtime suburban families reeling.


WHY DO FAST FOOD CHAINS ONLY HIRE HISPANICS AND ILLEGALS???

THEN WE GET THE TAX BILL FOR THEIR MISERABLE WAGES… THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION INVITED TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED IS STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE!!!




McDonalds, Burger King and Jack in the Box HELP MEXICO LOOT AMERICA… ever been to one of these places that hired ANY ONE but HISPANICS that can barely speak English?

NOW THEY’RE SENDING THEM TO THE WELFARE LINES TO MAKE UP FOR MISERABLE WAGES…. the amnesty hoax… IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!!!



 

CONGRESS' WAR ON AMERICANS - Budget conference committee meets to slash social spending

Budget conference committee meets to slash social spending
Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population


OBAMA – THE SOCIOPATH BANKSTERS FUNDED AND ILLEGALS REELECTED.


OBAMA IS A SOCIOPATH. HE CAN LIE OUT OF HIS BIG MOUTH ABOUT ANYTHING AND THEN GO SERVE HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS AND LA RAZA!


But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows something that is a troublesome sign for the White House. Only 30 percent of Americans believe that the president “cares a lot” about “the needs and problems of people” like themselves.

On fifth anniversary of Wall Street crash, Obama tries the Big Lie technique


17 September 2013
 

On Monday, US President Barack Obama marked the fifth anniversary of the Wall Street crash of September 15, 2008 with a White House speech that only underscored the unbridgeable chasm that separates the entire political establishment from the broad mass of working people.

 
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/crony-capitalism-obama-celebrates-5.html

 
Forbes magazine reported that the wealth of the 400 richest Americans had climbed to $2 trillion, a jump from $1.7 trillion in 2012.

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population

1 November 2013
The inauguration of the private health care exchanges as part of the Affordable Care Act this past month has set off a political crisis for the Obama administration. Underlying the immediate issue of the failure of the new web site is the character of Obamacare itself—an attack on health care cloaked in the guise of “reform,” whose basic aim is to slash health care spending and shift a greater cost burden onto the backs of individuals.

From the beginning, cutting health care spending has been the central motivation of discussions over the Obama administration’s main domestic initiative. This was to be done by requiring individuals to purchase private insurance or face a penalty, thereby allowing corporations and governments to eliminate their own health care programs and leave individuals at the mercy of private insurers’ profit interests. Just as the health care overhaul goes into effect, bipartisan discussions are underway to slash hundreds of billions more from Medicare and Social Security.

Underlying the entire discussion in the political establishment is a basic concern of the American ruling class, a concern that is generally left unstated—namely, that people in the end are simply living too long. The advances of modern medicine have extended lives, often significantly beyond the age of retirement.

For the political strategists of the corporate and financial elite, these years of retirement and medical care are not seen as a good, but as a source of costs that must be slashed, so that they can take that money. This is to be accomplished either by raising the retirement age, by lowering life expectancy so that people die earlier, or both.

Two recent policy papers from the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a Washington-based think tank with close ties to the US military-intelligence agencies and both big business parties, give a sense of the discussions taking place behind the scenes.

One paper, “The Global Aging Preparedness Index” (GAP Index), examines the impact of the “stunning demographic transformation” caused by rising lifespans in the US and internationally. The second paper, “The Budget Crisis and the Civil-Military Challenge to National Security Spending,” is written by Anthony H. Cordesman, a longtime CSIS strategist who acts as a consultant for the US State and Defense departments.

The first study states that the US would rate much higher on the “GAP Index” if not for the “extraordinarily rapid rate of growth in health-care spending”, particularly for the aging population. The authors divide the older population into two categories: “young elderly,” ages 60-69, and “old elderly,” 70 and beyond. They maintain that because people are living longer, the “young elderly” are not truly “old age” and should not be allowed to retire “early” and bilk the system.

The solution? Raise the retirement age for Social Security—and, by implication, eligibility for Medicare—and force these supposedly “young elderly” to continue working. The Obama administration has indicated its support for such measures, which are part of the ongoing discussion between the two parties in Washington.

To bolster their argument, the CSIS authors helpfully suggest that working into old age “is not only good for the health of the budget and the economy, but according to most gerontologists it is also good for the health of the elderly themselves.” The modern-day phenomenon of elderly workers competing for minimum-wage jobs because their pensions have been slashed or eliminated turns out to be…a boon to good health.

In his paper, written from the standpoint of the military-intelligence apparatus, Cordesman states: “The US does not face any foreign threat as serious as its failure to come to grips with…the rise in the cost of federal entitlement spending.” He argues that the growth of the federal deficit and debt are driven “almost exclusively by the rise in federal spending on major health care programs, Social Security, and cost of net interest on the debt.”

Cordesman bemoans that as the population grows older, seniors are sapping vital resources as they seek treatment for dementia, heart disease, and cancer. By implication, something must be done to rein this in, especially if the United States is to address Cordesman’s main priority—maintaining the current exorbitant spending on wars and the US military.

Both documents claim that the great divide in society is between the “young” and the “old,” and that by swallowing up a disproportionate share of the national wealth, the elderly are placing the younger generation in danger.

This is a cynical lie. The central danger to American society is the capitalist system, which entails the unrestrained plundering of the working class by a narrow and parasitic ruling elite whose escalating wealth and campaigns of military aggression are bleeding society white.

The elderly, the vast majority of whom struggle to survive on Social Security and dwindling retirement accounts, are denounced as leeches on society, while the wealth of the super-rich grows to unprecedented levels. Though the combined pay of the top 10 highest paid CEOs in the US was $4.7 billion last year alone, the representatives of the ruling class demand that workers’ retirement age be raised and health care spending slashed.

It is such considerations that underlie Obamacare and the broader framework of the health care “debate,” aimed at setting up an even more heavily class-based system, in which most people receive substandard care while the rich can afford the most modern medicines and procedures.

And it is such considerations that have motivated the campaign from the news media, and particularly the New York Times, to restrict supposedly “unnecessary” medical treatment for ordinary people.
That the representatives of the corporate and financial elite see the growth in life expectancy and improved health in old age—standard measures of an advancing society—as a positive evil is in itself a damning indictment of their policies and of the capitalist system that they defend.

Kate Randall

the figures are in on Obama’s looting of America for Wall Street!

STAGGERING POVERTY IN AMERICA CAUSED BY OBAMA, HIS CRONIES AND WALL STREET DONORS…AND THEN ILLEGALS GET THE JOBS!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/obamanomics-and-obamas-crony-capitalism.html


According to a new report by University of California Berkeley Professor Emmanuel Saez, the gulf between the wealthy and the rest of society has sharply expanded under Obama. The richest one percent now monopolize more than 22 percent of all household income in America. The richest ten percent of the population now control more than half of the nation’s income, 50.4 percent—the highest proportion since the government began collecting income statistics in 1917.

Since 2009, the richest one percent has captured a staggering 95 percent of all income gains. The class war policies of the government—including bank bailouts, “quantitative easing” and an attack on wage and benefits for the working class—have led to a 31.4 percent rise in income for the top one percent. The wealthy have more than recovered the losses that came from the Wall Street collapse of 2008.

Meanwhile, the bottom 99 percent has seen a negligible 0.4 percent rise in income. Tens of millions of workers—who never recovered from the record household income drop of 2007 to 2009—continue to reel from the effects of mass job losses, falling wages, home foreclosures, indebtedness and social service cuts.

OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA BLANKET AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.

In fact, real median household income dropped in every year of Obama's first term. In 2008, when he was elected, it was $53,644. In 2009, the year he was inaugurated, it dropped to 53,285. In 2010, his second year in office, it dropped to $51,892. In 2011, his third year in office, it dropped to $51,100. And, in 2012, his fourth year in office, it dropped to $51,017. At the same time the number of people living in poverty in the United States increased. In 2008, according to the Census Bureau, there were approximately 39,829,000 people living in poverty in this country. In 2012, there were 46,496,000. That is an increase of approximately 6,667,000—of 16.73 percent—from 2008 to 2012.


 
SHUTDOWN… BUT NO CESSATION OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING 
JUST AS THE AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO'S LOOTING IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH AND ENDLESS FLOW OF MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS, SO IS THIS SHUTDOWN SIMPLY ONE MORE ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS ALREADY DECIMATED BY WALL STREET'S LOOTING AND ALL JOBS GOING TO LA RAZA!
 “There are growing indications that, as with previous artificially engineered government crises, a phony war between the two corporate-controlled parties is being used to escalate the relentless and very real war against the living standards of the working class.”

 
 

THE OBAMA ASSAULT on AMERICA FOR GREATER PROFITS FOR HIS WALL STREET DONORS! - Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population


OBAMA – THE SOCIOPATH BANKSTERS FUNDED AND ILLEGALS REELECTED.


OBAMA IS A SOCIOPATH. HE CAN LIE OUT OF HIS BIG MOUTH ABOUT ANYTHING AND THEN GO SERVE HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS AND LA RAZA!


But the latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows something that is a troublesome sign for the White House. Only 30 percent of Americans believe that the president “cares a lot” about “the needs and problems of people” like themselves.

On fifth anniversary of Wall Street crash, Obama tries the Big Lie technique


17 September 2013

 

On Monday, US President Barack Obama marked the fifth anniversary of the Wall Street crash of September 15, 2008 with a White House speech that only underscored the unbridgeable chasm that separates the entire political establishment from the broad mass of working people.

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/crony-capitalism-obama-celebrates-5.html

 
Forbes magazine reported that the wealth of the 400 richest Americans had climbed to $2 trillion, a jump from $1.7 trillion in 2012.

Obamacare and the “crisis” of an aging population

1 November 2013
The inauguration of the private health care exchanges as part of the Affordable Care Act this past month has set off a political crisis for the Obama administration. Underlying the immediate issue of the failure of the new web site is the character of Obamacare itself—an attack on health care cloaked in the guise of “reform,” whose basic aim is to slash health care spending and shift a greater cost burden onto the backs of individuals.

From the beginning, cutting health care spending has been the central motivation of discussions over the Obama administration’s main domestic initiative. This was to be done by requiring individuals to purchase private insurance or face a penalty, thereby allowing corporations and governments to eliminate their own health care programs and leave individuals at the mercy of private insurers’ profit interests. Just as the health care overhaul goes into effect, bipartisan discussions are underway to slash hundreds of billions more from Medicare and Social Security.

Underlying the entire discussion in the political establishment is a basic concern of the American ruling class, a concern that is generally left unstated—namely, that people in the end are simply living too long. The advances of modern medicine have extended lives, often significantly beyond the age of retirement.

For the political strategists of the corporate and financial elite, these years of retirement and medical care are not seen as a good, but as a source of costs that must be slashed, so that they can take that money. This is to be accomplished either by raising the retirement age, by lowering life expectancy so that people die earlier, or both.

Two recent policy papers from the Center for Strategic & International Studies, a Washington-based think tank with close ties to the US military-intelligence agencies and both big business parties, give a sense of the discussions taking place behind the scenes.

One paper, “The Global Aging Preparedness Index” (GAP Index), examines the impact of the “stunning demographic transformation” caused by rising lifespans in the US and internationally. The second paper, “The Budget Crisis and the Civil-Military Challenge to National Security Spending,” is written by Anthony H. Cordesman, a longtime CSIS strategist who acts as a consultant for the US State and Defense departments.

The first study states that the US would rate much higher on the “GAP Index” if not for the “extraordinarily rapid rate of growth in health-care spending”, particularly for the aging population. The authors divide the older population into two categories: “young elderly,” ages 60-69, and “old elderly,” 70 and beyond. They maintain that because people are living longer, the “young elderly” are not truly “old age” and should not be allowed to retire “early” and bilk the system.

The solution? Raise the retirement age for Social Security—and, by implication, eligibility for Medicare—and force these supposedly “young elderly” to continue working. The Obama administration has indicated its support for such measures, which are part of the ongoing discussion between the two parties in Washington.

To bolster their argument, the CSIS authors helpfully suggest that working into old age “is not only good for the health of the budget and the economy, but according to most gerontologists it is also good for the health of the elderly themselves.” The modern-day phenomenon of elderly workers competing for minimum-wage jobs because their pensions have been slashed or eliminated turns out to be…a boon to good health.

In his paper, written from the standpoint of the military-intelligence apparatus, Cordesman states: “The US does not face any foreign threat as serious as its failure to come to grips with…the rise in the cost of federal entitlement spending.” He argues that the growth of the federal deficit and debt are driven “almost exclusively by the rise in federal spending on major health care programs, Social Security, and cost of net interest on the debt.”

Cordesman bemoans that as the population grows older, seniors are sapping vital resources as they seek treatment for dementia, heart disease, and cancer. By implication, something must be done to rein this in, especially if the United States is to address Cordesman’s main priority—maintaining the current exorbitant spending on wars and the US military.

Both documents claim that the great divide in society is between the “young” and the “old,” and that by swallowing up a disproportionate share of the national wealth, the elderly are placing the younger generation in danger.

This is a cynical lie. The central danger to American society is the capitalist system, which entails the unrestrained plundering of the working class by a narrow and parasitic ruling elite whose escalating wealth and campaigns of military aggression are bleeding society white.

The elderly, the vast majority of whom struggle to survive on Social Security and dwindling retirement accounts, are denounced as leeches on society, while the wealth of the super-rich grows to unprecedented levels. Though the combined pay of the top 10 highest paid CEOs in the US was $4.7 billion last year alone, the representatives of the ruling class demand that workers’ retirement age be raised and health care spending slashed.

It is such considerations that underlie Obamacare and the broader framework of the health care “debate,” aimed at setting up an even more heavily class-based system, in which most people receive substandard care while the rich can afford the most modern medicines and procedures.

And it is such considerations that have motivated the campaign from the news media, and particularly the New York Times, to restrict supposedly “unnecessary” medical treatment for ordinary people.
That the representatives of the corporate and financial elite see the growth in life expectancy and improved health in old age—standard measures of an advancing society—as a positive evil is in itself a damning indictment of their policies and of the capitalist system that they defend.

Kate Randall

the figures are in on Obama’s looting of America for Wall Street!

STAGGERING POVERTY IN AMERICA CAUSED BY OBAMA, HIS CRONIES AND WALL STREET DONORS…AND THEN ILLEGALS GET THE JOBS!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/09/obamanomics-and-obamas-crony-capitalism.html

 

According to a new report by University of California Berkeley Professor Emmanuel Saez, the gulf between the wealthy and the rest of society has sharply expanded under Obama. The richest one percent now monopolize more than 22 percent of all household income in America. The richest ten percent of the population now control more than half of the nation’s income, 50.4 percent—the highest proportion since the government began collecting income statistics in 1917.

Since 2009, the richest one percent has captured a staggering 95 percent of all income gains. The class war policies of the government—including bank bailouts, “quantitative easing” and an attack on wage and benefits for the working class—have led to a 31.4 percent rise in income for the top one percent. The wealthy have more than recovered the losses that came from the Wall Street collapse of 2008.

Meanwhile, the bottom 99 percent has seen a negligible 0.4 percent rise in income. Tens of millions of workers—who never recovered from the record household income drop of 2007 to 2009—continue to reel from the effects of mass job losses, falling wages, home foreclosures, indebtedness and social service cuts.

 
OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA BLANKET AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.

In fact, real median household income dropped in every year of Obama's first term. In 2008, when he was elected, it was $53,644. In 2009, the year he was inaugurated, it dropped to 53,285. In 2010, his second year in office, it dropped to $51,892. In 2011, his third year in office, it dropped to $51,100. And, in 2012, his fourth year in office, it dropped to $51,017. At the same time the number of people living in poverty in the United States increased. In 2008, according to the Census Bureau, there were approximately 39,829,000 people living in poverty in this country. In 2012, there were 46,496,000. That is an increase of approximately 6,667,000—of 16.73 percent—from 2008 to 2012.

 
SHUTDOWN… BUT NO CESSATION OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING 
JUST AS THE AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO'S LOOTING IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH AND ENDLESS FLOW OF MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS, SO IS THIS SHUTDOWN SIMPLY ONE MORE ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS ALREADY DECIMATED BY WALL STREET'S LOOTING AND ALL JOBS GOING TO LA RAZA!
 
“There are growing indications that, as with previous artificially engineered government crises, a phony war between the two corporate-controlled parties is being used to escalate the relentless and very real war against the living standards of the working class.”