JAMES WALSH: THE OBAMA
CONSPIRACY – The Hispanicazation of America and surrender of U.S. sovereignty
to Mexico.
THE AMNESTY HOAX – EVERY DAY OBAMA SABOTAGES OUR BORDERS MORE TO BUILD THE LA RAZA DEM PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS. SUCH IS TO DESTROY THE GOP AND PROVIDE MILLIONS OF MEXICANS OUR JOBS, WELFARE AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDING FACTORIES.
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES
OBAMA’S AGENDA OF ASSAULTING OUR BORDERS, AMERICANS IN JOBS HE WANTS TO FILL
WITH ILLEGALS
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
“While the Obama
Administration downplays violence along the U.S.-Mexico border, authorities in
Texas reveal that Mexican drug cartels have transformed parts of the state into
a war zone where shootings, beheadings, kidnappings and murders are common.
Americans See Obama as SABOTAGING Homeland Security to Build his
LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS:
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
the shocking reality of an elected traitor:
Obama's
'Hispanicazation' of America
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-most.html
THE REALITY OF THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY MEXICAN OCCUPATION:
We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that
promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New
Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.
OBAMA PARTNERS WITH MEXICO TO SURRENDER OUR BORDERS!
“While the Obama
Administration downplays violence along the U.S.-Mexico border, authorities in
Texas reveal that Mexican drug cartels have transformed parts of the state into
a war zone where shootings, beheadings, kidnappings and murders are common.
*
REP. STEVE KING (R-IOWA) ON
OBAMA’S AMNESTY HOAX:
King’s amendment would bar
funding for any attempt by the Obama administration to implement amnesty by
executive decree. Over the past two years, President Obama, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and ICE Director John Morton have
attempted to enact de facto amnesty through prosecutorial discretion, deferred
action, and lax enforcement policies, King noted.
PRAYERS for AMERICANS MURDERED BY
ILLEGALS: THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE
ALIPAC:
CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER
OF MEX GANG MEMBERS EXCEEDS 1.5 MILLION!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
And there are some 800,000
gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in
our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to
import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert
joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why
he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug
gangs.
EVEN AS THE MEX DRUG
CARTELS POUR OVER OUR BORDERS, OBAMA HAS TAKEN HUNDREDS MORE GUARD OFF SINCE
SEPT 2009! AND THE OBAMA DECLARES “BORDER SECURITY” IS THE HALLMARK OF HIS
PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROPPING UP MUSLIM DICTATORS
OVER THERE AND SABOTAGING OUR BORDERS OVER HERE. UNDER THE GUISE OF SEQUESTER,
OBAMA LET LOSE ON US MORE THAN 2,0000 MEXICAN CRIMINALS AND FURLOUGHED 6,000
BORDER GUARDS EVEN AS THE MEXICANS WERE JUMPING OUR BORDERS IN ADVANCE FOR HIS
BLANKET AMNESTY!
President Barack Obama and Mexico Partner to Expand the LA RAZA
MEXICAN WELFARE STATE in America through "amnesty"
more at this link –
post on Facebook and email broadcast
US
to spend $1.3 billion on Afghanistan bases
By
Bill Van Auken
24 August 2010
24 August 2010
The Pentagon is
embarking on a major base construction effort in Afghanistan even as Obama
administration and military officials are making it clear that the US “surge”
will last well past the July 11 deadline for beginning a drawdown of US troops.
The Washington
Post reported Monday that the US Congress is preparing to pass legislation
providing “$1.3 billion in additional fiscal 2011 funds for multiyear
construction of military facilities in Afghanistan”. These funds would cover,
in part, $100 million expansions for each of three major US air bases in
different parts of the country.
These projects, the Post
stated, are indicative of plans “to support increased US military operations
well into the future.”
INVESTORS.com
Amnesty In Disguise OBAMA'S SABOTAGE OF OUR BORDERS FROM DAY ONE
08/10/2010
Border: After suing Arizona to assert federal
supremacy over states on immigration, it turns out that ICE, Washington's
immigration cop on the beat, isn't enforcing the law at all. This is amnesty by
another name.
Oh,
what a hullabaloo the Justice Department made last month over Arizona's SB
1070, arguing before a federal district judge that the law must be struck down
because the federal government has "pre-eminent authority to regulate
immigration matters."
Arizona's
effort was depicted as some sort of secessionist usurpation of federal
prerogatives, despite the fact that SB 1070 mirrored federal law.
Incredibly,
Judge Susan Bolton, an appointee of President Clinton, agreed and issued an
injunction on those grounds.
In
practical terms, her decision means that Arizona's 15,000 lawmen could not help
federal agents enforce the law on America's largest and most dangerous
immigrant-smuggling corridor.
Now
it's obvious why: The Justice Department isn't interested in enforcing the law.
Last
week, 259 representatives of the union that represents 7,000 Immigration and
Customs Enforcement agents handed down a unanimous vote of "no
confidence" in ICE leaders, whose policies keep them from doing their job.
Based
on those policies, agents can no longer arrest illegal immigrants even if they
announce their status on a sandwich board.
According
to a June 29 memo from ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton, ICE must now
"prioritize the apprehension and removal of aliens who only pose a threat
to national security and/or public safety, such as criminals and
terrorists."
Given
that all police agencies look for such targets, such a premise is absurd.
Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, after all, was arrested by a traffic cop,
not a fancy anti-terror strike force, in 1995.
And
aside from wondering why terrorists are being released at all across a border
they'll have no trouble recrossing, Morton's policy effectively means no one is
looking for illegal immigrants once they make it past the Border Patrol.
This is
taking pick-and-choose law enforcement to an extreme and runs counter to best
police practices, such as James Q. Wilson's "broken window" theory of
criminology. This holds that enforcement against minor crimes in an area helps
prevent an escalation into more serious crime.
ICE's
Morton claims the agency has limited resources, so it can deport only 400,000
illegal immigrants a year. From a government agency with a $2.6 billion
detention and removal budget, that comes to about $6,500 per deportee, a de
facto statement of government inefficiency and waste. And it affects only 4% of
all illegal border-crossers.
Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't
want to enforce immigration
By: Heather Mac Donald
OpEd Contributor
August 4, 2010
OpEd Contributor
August 4, 2010
The real motivation for the
Justice Department's lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration statute was the
only one not mentioned in the department's brief: The Obama administration has
no intention of enforcing the immigration laws against the majority of illegal
aliens already in the country.
It is that policy alone
which conflicts with SB 1070: Arizona wants to enforce the law; the Obama
administration does not. Reasonable minds can differ on whether that conflict
puts Arizona in violation of the Constitution's Supremacy Clause.
But what is indisputable is
that the failure of the federal government to openly acknowledge the real
ground for its opposition to SB 1070 has rendered incoherent not just its own
public arguments against the law, but the judicial ruling which largely rubber
stamps those arguments as well.
The Arizona statute affirms
the power of a local police officer or sheriff's deputy to inquire into
someone's immigration status, if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the
person is in the country illegally, and if doing so is practicable. Under SB
1070, such an inquiry may occur only during a lawful stop to investigate a
non-immigration offense.
Both the Justice Department
and U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, in striking down most of SB 1070, couched
their opposition to the statute exclusively in terms of its effect on legal, as
opposed to illegal, aliens. SB 1070, Judge Bolton wrote, would impermissibly
burden legal immigrants already in the country by subjecting them to
unwarranted immigration checks.
There are two problems with
this line of argument: First, it ignores the fact that Congress has already
anticipated and approved precisely the sort of local immigration inquiries that
Judge Bolton now finds unconstitutional. Second, the argument would make all
immigration enforcement impossible.
In 1996, Congress banned
so-called sanctuary policies, by which cities and states prohibit their
employees from working with federal immigration authorities regarding illegal
aliens. It was in the federal interest, Congress declared, that local and
federal authorities cooperate in the "apprehension, detention or removal
of [illegal] aliens."
In pursuance of that
mandate, the federal government operates an immigration clearinghouse, the Law
Enforcement Support Center (LESC), to provide just the sort of
immigration-status information to local and state law-enforcement officials
that SB 1070 seeks.
It is therefore absurd to
now claim, as Judge Bolton and the Obama Administration do, that such local
inquiries conflict with the federal immigration scheme. It is even more absurd
to argue that the risk that a legal alien will be questioned about his
immigration status makes the alleged conflict unconstitutional.
Any immigration enforcement
carries the possibility that a legal alien or U.S. citizen will be stopped and
questioned. The only way to guarantee that legal aliens are never asked to
present their immigration papers is to suspend immigration enforcement
entirely. (The same possibility of stopping innocent people for questioning
applies to law enforcement generally; that possibility has never been held to
invalidate the police investigative power.)
If Congress intended to
create such a blanket ban on asking legal aliens for proof of legal residency,
it could have revoked the 1952 law requiring aliens to carry their certificate
of alien registration. Such a requirement makes sense only on the assumption
that legal aliens will upon occasion be asked to prove their legal status.
Such unpersuasive reasoning
suggests that something else is going on. That something is the fact that SB
1070 would have put the Obama administration in the uncomfortable position of
repeatedly telling Arizona's law enforcement officers that it is not interested
in detaining or deporting the illegal aliens that they have encountered in the
course of their duties; the law, in other words, would have exposed the
administration's de facto amnesty policy.
And SB 1070 would have
shown that immigration-law enforcement can work simply by creating a deterrent
to illegal entry and presence. Even before it went into operation, the Arizona
law was already inducing illegal aliens to leave the state, according to news
reports.
Illegal aliens are
virtually absent from the Justice Department's brief or from Judge Bolton's
opinion. Despite this studied avoidance, it's time to have a public debate
about how much immigration enforcement this country wants and which enforcement
policies--the administration's or Arizona's -- best represent the public will.
Heather Mac
Donald is a contributing editor of City Journal and co-author of The
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/White-House-doesn_t-want-to-enforce-immigration-1007060-99891419.html#ixzz0w8gI2nha
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIALWATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
“THE
AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST
25 YEARS” Heritage Foundation
"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of the
welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior analyst
at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary Committee field
hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to hit their peak
around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very narrow time
horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If even a small
fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on Medicaid, you're
looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year." (SOCIAL SERVICES
TO ILLEGALS IN CALIFORNIA ALONE ARE NOT UP TO $20 BILLION PER YEAR. WELFARE FOR
ILLEGALS IN NEVADA, NOW 25% ILLEGAL, IS SOARING!)
Heritage: Amnestied Illegals Will
Get $9.4T in Benefits; Increase Debt $6.3T'
what is the REAL cost of all that “CHEAP” Mexican labor? Add
it up and then factor in the MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE and the fact that the
MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS now operate in 2,500 American cities!
more at this link –
post on Facebook and email broadcast
VIVA LA RAZA AMNESTY and OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA???
GOP: OBAMA’S AMNESTY
HANDOUT WILL COST THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BILLIONS!
more at this link –
post on Facebook and email broadcast
FAIRUS.org
U.S. Taxpayers Spend $113 Billion Annually
on Illegal Aliens
|
|
America has never been able to afford the costs of illegal
immigration. With rising unemployment and skyrocketing deficits, federal and
state lawmakers are now facing the results of failed policies. A new,
groundbreaking report from FAIR, The Fiscal
Burden of Illegal Immigration on U.S. Taxpayers,
takes a comprehensive look at the estimated fiscal costs resulting from
federal, state and local expenditures on illegal aliens and their U.S.-born
children.
Expanding upon the series of state studies done in the
past, FAIR has estimated the annual cost of illegal immigration to be $113
billion, with much of the cost — $84.2 billon — coming at the state and local
level.
|
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even
a goal of the department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S.
Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it
was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on
Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over
illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to
move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already
living in the United States.
Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty,
Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for
immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must
include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows
for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are
already here.”
Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s
ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes
proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal
aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those
concerns could be put to rest.
“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been
transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the
border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the
interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is
serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how
we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore,
we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of
illegal immigration.”
If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary
Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer.
But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland
Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even
a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894
miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with
protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for
FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.
The administration’s strategic approach to interior and
worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border,
unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released
November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell
by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent
fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer
criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6
percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the
administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic
game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite
enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits
determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the
opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company,
while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The
illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to
the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.
In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent
of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and
prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence
builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it
that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less
confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the
government paper they’re printed on.
As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to
overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the
“three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg –
enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased
admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with
some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And
the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense
of justice and fair play.
As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and
actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it
comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving
from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”
Mexican
drug gangs 'spread to every egion of US'
Mexican heroin production is growing
Mexican drug gangs have expanded their activities in the US
with heroin production doubling in 2008, the US justice department says in a
report.
Despite US funding for the war on drugs, trade in marijuana,
ecstasy and methamphetamine also grew, the National Drug Threat Assessment
said.
The report found that Mexican groups were active in every
region of the US.
Gangs were moving an estimated $40bn (£27bn) in cash back
into Mexico across the border each year, it added.
Mexico has long been the main conduit for illicit drugs
smuggled into the US but this report suggests that the efforts to halt the flow
on both sides of the border have had only a limited impact, the BBC's Richard
Lister reports from Washington.
In 2007 the US pledged $1.4bn (£0.9bn) over three years to
fight the drugs cartels but the following year heroin production in Mexico rose
from 17 to 38 metric tons.
This, the report says, led to lower heroin prices and more
overdose deaths in the US.
Network growth
The report found that Mexican heroin was poised to take a
"more significant share" of the market in US cities where South
American heroin has traditionally dominated.
For Asian heroin, the US continued to be a secondary market,
it said.
The assessment says that Mexican drug suppliers have
increased their co-operation with American street and prison gangs to expand
their distribution networks.
Speaking in Mexico City earlier this week, US Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton called for more efforts to tackle the social issues such
as poverty that fuel the drugs trade.
Mexico, which has some 50,000 troops engaged against the
cartels, has suggested that American money and equipment has not arrived
quickly enough.
MEXICO IN MELTDOWN – CARTELS POUR OVER BORDERS
BARACK OBAMA’S sabotage of homeland security and the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS
that endorse his LA RAZA SUPREMACY & OPEN BORDERS AGENDA
more at this link –
post on Facebook and email broadcast
OBAMA
TELLS MEXICO IT IS AMERICAN’S FAULT THERE ARE DEATHS BY MEXICAN DRUGS… EVEN AS
THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS OPERATE IN MORE THAN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES, INCLUDING
OBAMA’S CHICAGO AND HAUL BACK OVER OUR OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS $40 TO $60
BILLION PER YEAR!
more at this link –
post on Facebook and email broadcast
THERE IS A REASON WHY THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS OPERATE IN MORE THAN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES, INCLUDING OBAMA’S CHICAGO!
No comments:
Post a Comment