Saturday, June 25, 2016

AMERICA: No Damned Legal Need Apply!



SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER


The Washington Post is reporting that U.S. might not be able to follow in the U.K.’s footsteps in reclaiming its economic independence because of the nation’s demographic makeup, which is the result of four decades of record high green card issuances to foreign nationals.

In a piece entitled, “No, Brexit Isn’t A Good Sign For Trump,” Washington Post’s Kim Soffen writes:
“There are certainly similarities between the referendum and the [Trump] campaign. Both are largely driven by immigration… Both are nationalist movements. Both are an instance of the will of the people going against the wishes of the elite… And their demographic support looks quite similar too.”
Yet Soffen writes that Brexit may not be a harbinger for Donald Trump’s future electoral success because the U.S. does not have as many white voters as Britain does.
“Largely at issue here is demographics. The British electorate is overwhelmingly white – 87 percent of its population is, according to its 2011 census. That’s compared to the United States’ 74 percent in 2014. That difference is significant for what direction each country votes.”
Indeed, while establishment media has pushed the narrative that immigration is a much more significant issue in Europe than it is the U.S., the facts do not bear this out. The U.S. has accepted 10 million more migrants from outside its borders than the European Union has absorbed from outside its borders, even though the EU has 200 million more people than the United States. Indeed, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, minority babies now outnumber white babies in the United States.
Soffen reports that polling data suggests non-whites tended to support the globalist position over the nationalist policy.
“Just like more minority-dense areas in the United States, like cities, tend to vote Democrat, minority-dense areas in the United Kingdom tended to vote to stay in the EU. In London, where 60 percent of citizens are non-white according to the 2011 Census, 60 percent of votes went against Brexit, compared to 48 percent nationwide.”
“Since the U.S. is far more diverse than the U.K., Brexit’s predictive power is even weaker,” Soffen concludes.
The Washington Post suggests that in order to have nationalist policies, the U.S. has to have a large population of whites in its country. Perversely, the Washington Post is essentially arguing that foreign nationals do not seem to have a strong enough allegiance to their new country to support a nationalist agenda over a more global, internationalist agenda — an argument, which dramatically undercuts the Washington Post’s general narrative on immigration and contradicts a core theme of its human interests stories, which seem designed to advance legislation that would expand U.S. immigration.
The demographic makeup the United States—which the Washington Post posits is the reason the U.S. could perhaps be incapable of voting in favor of reclaiming its national sovereignty—is the result of a Ted Kennedy-backed 1965 immigration rewrite, which opened up America’s borders to the world.
Kennedy’s immigration law lifted the immigration caps that had been place and opened up U.S. visas to migrants all across the globe.
While about nine in ten of the immigrants who came to the United States during the 19th and 20th century hailed from Europe, the 1965 law inverted that figure. Today about nine out of every ten new immigrants brought into the country on green cards come from non-Western countries in Latin America, Africa, Asia or the Middle East.
Following the law’s passage, 59 million immigrants entered the United States. Including their children, it added 72 million new residents to the U.S. population.
In 1965, according to Pew, the country was 84 percent white, 11 percent black, 4 percent Hispanic and less than 1 percent Asian– i.e. it had a white population that very similar in size to the white population of the U.K. today.
Unless Congress proposes legislation to curb the U.S. autopilot visa issuances, Pew projects that in forty years time as a result of large-scale immigration, “no racial or ethnic group will constitute a majority of the U.S. population,” as “whites are projected to become less than half of the U.S. population by 2055.” Therefore, by 2065, the nation would be 46 percent white, 24 percent Hispanic, 14 percent Asian and 13 percent black.
However, members of the globalist caucus in Washington including House Speaker Paul Ryan, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and President Barack Obama, have all pushed to accelerate this demographic transformation and have championed proposals to dramatically expand the nation’s record high immigration admissions.

Heritage: Amnestied Illegals Will Get $9.4T in Benefits; Increase Debt $6.3T'

what is the REAL cost of all that “CHEAP” Mexican labor? Add it up and then factor in the MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE and the fact that the MEXICAN  now operate in 2,500 American cities!

OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS IT CALLED “THE OPEN BORDERS PROJECT”



“I estimate that enforcing the law and deporting all illegals would raise real low-skill wages by about 20% to 40% within 6 years, providing immediate relief to the oppressed low-skill citizens of our country.  (See my notes.)  Allowing in more high-skill people and few low-skill people would have long-term benefits that would eventually tower over this short-term benefit.  A more skilled population would increase the historical trend of economic growth in this country.  We might even become the richest per capita country in the world.





WILL THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS SELF-DESTRUCT BEFORE OBAMA DESTROYS IT?






OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS: The final death of the American Middle Class and the staggering expansion of the LA RAZA Mexican welfare state




THE “HOPE & CHANGE” HUCKSTER WHO REALLY WAS GEORGE BUSH’S THIRD AND FOURTH TERMS ON STEROIDS!


“The long-term reversal of the social gains made by the working class has

only accelerated in the wake of the 2008 economic crisis. President Obama

has overseen one of the greatest transfers of wealth from the working class

to the rich in world history.”



 LA RAZA-OCCUPATION and LOOTING in MEXIFORNIA…. shocking!
Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.

MILLIONS OF AMERICANS WITHOUT 

WORK AS OBAMA AND HILLARY EASE 

MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS OVER OUR OPEN

BORDERS



WORST JOB MARKET IN 40 YEARS… and

getting worse!


UNDER OBAMA, TWO-THIRDS OF JOBS GO TO HIS PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!



“At the hearing, Dr. Rakesh Kochar,

Associate Director for Research at the Pew

Hispanic Center, testified that in the year

following the official end of the recession

(June 2009), foreign-born workers gained

656,000 jobs while native-born workers lost

an additional 1.2 million jobs.”

The Democrat Party's War on the American Worker, American Borders, American Laws and the American Middle Class - VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?.


The U.S. Supreme Court this week let stand an appeals court decision that President Obama’s executive amnesty is illegal under the U.S. Constitution.  This means per the Constitution that immigration law is still set by the Congress passin...

Why do Democrats hate the 'Dreamers' so much?

The U.S. Supreme Court this week let stand an appeals court decision that President Obama’s executive amnesty is illegal under the U.S. Constitution.  This means per the Constitution that immigration law is still set by the Congress passing bills that presidents sign into law.
Among those affected by this decision are the so-called “Dreamers.”  These are people who were brought to the U.S. as young children, sometimes very young children.  Many of these people may be culturally quite American.  They may not even speak the language of the country they are citizens of via the citizenship of their parents.  The “Dreamers” did not break the law coming in to the U.S., as they were too young to have criminal intent.  They did not break the law by staying with their parents until they became of age, as they were minors under the control of their parents.  So they are quite a sympathetic group who might reasonably be expected to generate enough support in Congress to get some relief or a change in status.
But apparently the Democrats care so little for these “Dreamers” that they do not care what happens to them.  That is the only way to explain how the Democrats have acted over the years concerning immigration policy.  The Democrats seem unwilling to give up anything to help this sympathetic group or to build support for legalizing the “Dreamers.”
Back in 2006, after yet another rancorous debate on immigration policy and the failure of a comprehensive immigration bill, the Secure Fence Act of 2006 was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush.  The 2006 law provided for a two-layer fence on the southern border.  Rather than give the supporters of more secure borders a victory and build the fence, Washington and particularly the Democrats have blocked completion of the fence, amending the original law a year later and arguing that a fence on the southern border is wasteful and will not work.  In 2011 when President Obama was saying the fence was “now basically complete,” just over 5 percent or 36.3 miles of the originally legislated 700-mile double-layer fence was completed.
It is not as though a wasteful non-working fence on the southern border would be the single wasteful thing the government ever did.  It is not as though a non-working fence would be the first non-working thing the government ever built.
When you engage in negotiation with someone you expect to negotiate again with later, you know you had better follow through with what you promise.  If you don’t, you know that the other party will be very hesitant to negotiate or reach additional agreements with you in the future.  So with the legislated border fence not complete a decade later, naturally the opponents of illegal immigration hesitate to give up anything even on a sympathetic issue like the “Dreamers.”  This act of bad faith also has implications in presidential elections, but that is a story for another column.
A comprehensive immigration bill still seems highly unlikely at this time.  Still, there might be room to negotiate on smaller issues like legalizing “Dreamers” in exchange for some concession from the other side like an end to anchor babies, provided that a way to end anchor babies that satisfies the courts can be found.  But, of course, the scorched earth, no quarter given behavior of the Democrats on the border fence means that the opponents of illegal immigration are very hesitant to have their representatives negotiate on any issue concerning immigration.  So nothing gets done even for a sympathetic group like the “Dreamers.”
So why won’t the Democrats give the opponents of illegal immigration a fence they were promised legislatively?  Since Democrats generally claim that border fences will not work, why are they not happy to give their opponents a Pyrrhic victory of a double-layer border fence with a big ribbon-cutting ceremony?  That would also help them with part of the Democrat base: union members and the working poor.  It is not as if the Democrats are fiscal conservatives or dislike government and government spending.  The Democrats apparently do not care enough about the “Dreamers” to give an inch on immigration on any front to build support to legalize them.  One is left to conclude that the Democrats hate the “Dreamers.”

Mexico Endorses Hillary Clinton - Will LA RAZA Elect All Future American Presidents?

Why does the former President of NARCOMEX endorse Hillary Clinton?


DOESN’T MEXICO ALREADY LOOT HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS FROM THE AMERICA PEOPLE AND COMMIT MOST OF THE MURDERS OF LEGALS?


LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA ENDORSED BY NARCOMEX. HER VOW OF WIDER OPEN BORERS IS GOOD FOR LOOTING MEXICANS AND THEIR DRUG CARTELS!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-president-fox-of-narcomex.html


THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND LOOTING…. By Invitation of the American Government!




“The classic method of investigation is to follow the money:  First, billions exported to drug cartels, hundreds of billions spent on thousands of new government jobs in terrorism related industries, and millions of new illegal government dependents - all beneficiaries for this new cyclical dysfunction.  And the American presidential seat, now a dictatorship, up for grabs this year, is the grand prize to determine the next cycle of flow for trillions of dollars.  And we can again watch the senate and house pretend to hold down the fort and make more, useless, insincere and unenforced laws.”

Hillary Clinton's Promise to Mexico: 49 More Mexifornias

THE OBVIOUS SUCCESSOR TO THE LOOTING OF AMERICA CALLED THE OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS DOCTRINE

THE HILLARY & BILLARY CRIME DUAL HAVE ALWAYS SERVED THEMSELVES FIRST AND CRIMINAL BILLIONAIRES AND MUSLIM DICTATORS SECONDLY!

“Widely despised by young and lower-income voters as a corrupt personification of the status quo and a warmonger, Clinton has failed to generate any significant enthusiasm for her bid to follow her husband into the White House.”


"Nevertheless, Clinton has made a sharp turn to the right since the fascistic Trump’s emergence as the presumptive Republican nominee. She has largely dumped her semi-populist rhetoric—a response to the challenge from Sanders—and openly directed her appeal to disaffected Republican voters and campaign contributors, wealthier suburbanites, and, above all, Wall Street and the military/intelligence establishment."

May 28, 2016

Hillary Clinton -- Career Criminal

At the conclusion of an article on the State Department IG’s findings that Hillary Clinton brazenly violated federal record-keeping statutes, National Review’s Andrew McCarthy asks:
“What are we to make of Mrs. Clinton’s public posturing that of course [emphasis in original] she is prepared to cooperate -- and encourages her subordinates to cooperate -- with government investigators?”
The question is obviously rhetorical, but one problem with rhetorical questions is that we don’t always really answer them, other than shrugging. So allow me in this case to answer that question. What we are to make of Mrs. Clinton is that she is an accomplished career criminal -- and I mean that literally, not rhetorically. 
Like a lot of accomplished career criminals Mrs. Clinton has committed so many high crimes and misdemeanors, and gotten away with them to boot, that we tend to forget (or ignore) past acts of lawlessness because the new ones keep on coming. And like skillful felons the world over, Mrs. Clinton takes full advantage of this very human inclination, by sloughing off past accusations as “old news” or the result of biases that have emerged through “misunderstandings.” Anyone who has worked in criminal justice has seen this phenomenon, where repeat offenders get to know police, prosecutors and judges so well that law enforcement tires of them -- maybe even comes to like them a bit -- and so cut the career criminal a break. And the clever crook knows this tendency and plays upon it. It’s this dynamic that led to the development of “three strikes” laws, so such crooks don’t receive unearned or plainly manipulated sympathy. 
Donald Trump’s recent faux pas regarding the long-ago apparent suicide of Clinton confidant Vince Foster is an example of this process. Trump, as is his wont, made a poorly thought-out off-the-cuff remark suggesting that Foster was murdered, and that Clinton was behind it. Since this is one crime that the Clintons probably did not commit, Trump’s remark was foolish, since, like accusations about Obama’s birthplace, it just gives the leftist media ammunition to belittle legitimate criticisms. But it was also understandable -- Trump didn’t claim the accusations were true, only that he was aware of them, and given we’re talking about Hillary Clinton, well…
But Trump needn’t speculate about Foster’s fate, nor should we. Rather than trying to pin Foster’s death on Hillary, he ought to remind the public of her other crimes, and launch focused attacks on her documented and provable malfeasances, starting with her cattle futures trading windfall/bribe. Today, Hillary’s cattle trading is usually mentioned casually as an indicator of how far back Hillary’s corruption goes, but that crime (from 1978/79) itself is worth revisiting in some detail. 
Like most of Hillary’s wrongdoing, she benefits from the fact that her schemes are complex, superficially boring, and often hard for the general public to understand. In that sense it’s understandable that Trump fell into the trap of talking about the Foster case. Murder and/or suicide is comprehensible and sexy, trading livestock is not. That doesn’t change the fact that Hillary’s $100,000 trading windfall cannot reasonably be seen as anything but a criminal bribe. 
Anybody that knows anything about trading commodities understands that what Hillary claims to have done -- turn an initial $1000 investment in cattle futures into a $100,000 profit ten months later -- is as a practical matter almost impossible even for the most skilled commodity operator, and absolutely impossible for a neophyte such as Hillary was. My father traded commodities for decades, was very smart, reasonably good at it, and even ran an advisory service for a time. He managed to stay ahead but not by much. Three quarters of commodity traders lose money, the vast majority inexperienced traders like Clinton. 
An inexperienced blackjack player would have a much, much easier time turning a $1000 stake at a casino into $100,000, than would a similarly situated person in futures trading, though of course such a blackjack run would require almost perfect play. What Hillary claims to have done would have required divine intervention, or a criminal scheme. Since I am fairly sure the Almighty is not on her side, we need to go with the latter. 
After the trading scheme became public in the 1990s, Clinton and her defenders tried to explain the windfall away as a combination of Hillary’s native intelligence, luck, and good advice. But a scholarly paper put out in 1994 by the Journal of Economics and Finance calculated that the odds of gaining such a profit in ten months under conditions at the time, and giving the investor the benefit of the doubt, at 31 trillion to 1. By way of comparison, the odds that the blood detected on O.J. Simpson’s notorious glove (found after the murders at Simpson’s estate), did not contain the blood of his victims is between 21 and 41 billion chances in one. Thus, at least by this metric, it is far, far more likely that O.J. Simpson is innocent of the murders of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson, than it is that Hillary’s cattle futures profit was not illegal. Even a bored, inattentive and not very bright electorate can understand that. And I understand that some people never will understand it no matter what, which is why O.J. walked. 
The futures trading incident is also notable in that after the scheme became a legal and political issue, Hillary’s cool reaction to it proved to be her coming out party as an effective mob boss who could handle herself under intense pressure and scrutiny. She was widely praised in the liberal press for being forthcoming and unflappable, while also giving no ground, a pattern that would repeat itself again and again, up to the present.   
Hillary’s cattle futures bribery scheme dates back to the same time frame as she began her other introductory criminal scam, Whitewater. From there came the Rose Law Firm billing records scandal (related to Whitewater), Travelgate, Hillary’s libels against victims of her husband’s predatory sexual behavior, Troopergate (related to Bill’s dalliances), the White House’s missing furniture, the friendly mortgage for the house in Chappaqua, a carpet-bagging Senate run, the Clinton Foundation, pay for play speeches, Benghazi, and the email scandals. (I may have missed one or two others.) 
It is a breathtaking history of scandal and criminality that might make Tony Soprano blush, and is certainly the envy of real life mob bosses cooling their heels in penitentiaries jail across the nation. Hillary simply has almost all the traits (and history) of a successful mob boss, including a close knit group of loyal confederates who operate under a code of omerta
Trump has many flaws, but to my knowledge he is not an outright criminal, much less a mob boss. Trump needn’t concern himself with Vince Foster. He does need to thoughtfully and aggressively hone his attack on Hillary’s enduring criminality. There is plenty to work with. 


Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/05/hillary_clinton__career_criminal.html#ixzz49xqSEmD2

THE SABOTAGE of AMERICA'S HOMELAND SECURITY

THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT'S SABOTAGE OF AMERICA'S HOMELAND SECURITY:

Federal laws are broken daily, by this US President, (and the two previous), as he uses executive orders to enact “policies” that are contrary to existing law.  Many of these laws were originally enacted to protect the sanctity of US...


THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND LOOTING…. By Invitation of the American Government!






“The classic method of investigation is to follow the money:  First, billions 

exported to drug cartels, hundreds of billions spent on thousands of 

new government jobs in terrorism related industries, and millions 

of new illegal government dependents - all beneficiaries for this 

new cyclical dysfunction.  And the American presidential seat, now a 

dictatorship, up for grabs this year, is the grand prize to determine the next cycle of 

flow for trillions of dollars.  And we can again watch the senate and house pretend to 

hold down the fort and make more, useless, insincere and unenforced laws.”

BRETBART VIDEO OF THE INVADING HORDES….

THEY MURDER, RAPE, MOLEST, BEHEAD, MARKET THEIR HEROIN AND THEN GO VOTE DEM FOR MORE ANCHOR BABY WELFARE!.... THEY ALREADY GET OUR JOBS

THE LA RAZA FASCIST MOVEMENT AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE

…. They murder, behead, machete children to death, expand the NARCOMEX heroin market, suck in billions in welfare and the go VOTE DEM FOR MORE!





Heritage: Amnestied Illegals Will Get $9.4T in Benefits; Increase Debt $6.3T'

what is the REAL cost of all that “CHEAP” Mexican labor? Add it up and then factor in the MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE and the fact that the MEXICAN  now operate in 2,500 American cities!


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/05/will-obamas-amnesty-bankrupt-us.html

Friday, June 24, 2016

HILLARY CLINTON'S ECONOMIC AGENDA: MORE BAILOUTS FOR OBAMA'S CRONY BANKSTERS AND MORE MILLIONS MORE JOBS AND BILLIONS MORE IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS

Clinton’s right-wing economic agenda and the fight for socialism

Clinton’s right-wing economic agenda and the fight for socialism

By Jerry White—SEP candidate for US president 
24 June 2016
Wednesday’s speech by Hillary Clinton in Raleigh, North Carolina makes it clear the Democratic Party’s presumptive presidential candidate, if elected in November, would escalate the anti-worker economic agenda of the Obama administration that has already created the greatest levels of social inequality in modern American history.
Since clinching the nomination, Clinton has sought to assure both Wall Street and the military intelligence apparatus that she would be a far better steward of the domestic and foreign interests of American capitalism than her Republican opponent Donald Trump. She reiterated Wednesday that Trump would “run up our debt and cause another economic crash.”
Clinton has already lined up the support of billionaires Warren Buffett and George Soros and a list of former executives from some of corporate America’s largest companies, including General Motors, Delta Air Lines, Costco and Alphabet, the parent company for online search giant Google. She also has received far greater backing from Wall Street than Trump.
Well aware that the seething social discontent in America prohibits her from simply repeating President Obama’s absurd claims that life has never been so good, Clinton sought to cover her right-wing economic proposals with rhetoric about economic inequality, largely borrowed from the campaign of Bernie Sanders.
She referred to stagnant and falling real wages, long-term joblessness, the crushing debt burden students face and the nation’s decaying schools and infrastructure without mentioning that Obama, with her full support, had overseen this state of affairs for the last seven-and-a-half years.
Clinton gave the novel explanation that well-meaning business leaders and politicians from both parties—“whose sincerity I do not doubt”—were simply misguided. “Too many leaders in business and government have lost sight of our shared responsibility to each other and to our nation. And they let Wall Street take big risks with unregulated financial activities.”
She failed to mention that it was her husband Bill Clinton’s administration that abolished the Depression-era Glass Steagall Act and deregulated the financial industry, spurring one financial bubble after the other, culminating in the 2008 crash and the social catastrophe that followed. For their services, both Clintons have been handsomely rewarded.
“We need to make sure our economy works for everyone not just for the rich or the well-connected,” Clinton preached with a straight face.
At the same time, Clinton reiterated Obama’s nostrum that those without work or serious prospects for a future were largely at fault because they were not keeping up with technological advances. “The old model of work where you could expect to hold a steady job with good benefits for an entire career is long gone.” She praised the “flexibility” of the new jobs that have been created—largely part-time, low-paid and so-called independent contractors—suggesting that 401(k)s and health benefits should be “portable” from one job to another.
So what does Clinton propose?
1. “We need to slash unnecessary regulations…Let’s free entrepreneurs to do what they do best: innovate, grow and hire…they need to be free from red tape.”
Translation: More tax cuts, deregulation and government payouts to large corporations and start-up companies.
2. “Establish an infrastructure bank that will bring private sector dollars off the sidelines and put them to work here.”
Translation: Instead of a public works programs, Clinton proposes more “public-private partnerships” aimed at handing over public assets to profit-making companies. This would accelerate the contracting out of good-paying jobs and continue the slashing of public sector jobs, which fell by more than 600,000 under Obama.
3. “I want to expand incentives like the new market’s tax credit, empowerment zones and other ideas that bring business, government and communities together to create good jobs in poor or remote areas. Places that have lost a factory or a mine, where generations of families used to work.”
Translation: Companies will be given waivers from federal job safety, environmental and wage and hour laws in order to entice US and international corporations to exploit economic desperation in areas already ravaged by deindustrialization.
4. “Rewrite the rules, so more companies share profits with employees and fewer shift profits and jobs overseas.”
Translation: Boost the efforts of the trade union bureaucracy to push so-called profit-sharing schemes, in lieu of wage increases. These hold workers’ livelihoods hostage to economic crisis and the shortsighted and even criminal business decisions of the corporate bosses, over which workers have no control.
5.  Let’s liberate the millions of Americans who already have student debt by making it easier to refinance, just like a mortgage. Let’s make it easier to have debt forgiven by doing national service.”
Translation: There will be no amelioration of the crushing levels of student debt. Instead, students will be able to be subject to the same predatory schemes that mortgage companies used in the run-up to the housing market crash in 2007-08. Heavily indebted students should be turned into indentured servants and forced to do “national service,” which most ominously could include, if the Pentagon needs more manpower, going off to fight America’s imperialist wars.
Clinton made sure to pay tribute to the trade unions—which have collaborated in the slashing of wages and shifting of health care and pension costs from the employers to workers, while reducing strikes to the lowest level since World War II. Saying “I believe we should strengthen unions,” she assured the labor bureaucracy that their financial interests would be protected under a Clinton administration, which would provide government funding to union apprenticeship programs and facilitate the investment of union pension funds in infrastructure and commercial development projects.
In a nod to the AFL-CIO, Clinton endorsed the economic nationalism promoted by the unions, which has long been used to divide American workers from their brothers and sisters internationally, subordinate them to the profit interests of their “own” capitalists, and pave the way for trade war and militarism. Earlier in the week, she denounced Trump for using Chinese labor to produce his brand name suits and ties.
Well aware that the millions of workers and young people who voted for Sanders largely hate her pro-business policies and record, Clinton urged young people in particular not to “grow weary” with their miserable situation. “There are great ideas out there,” she said pathetically, “we are going to be partners in a big bold effort to increase economic growth and distribute it more fairly.”
As the Socialist Equality Party’s candidate for US president, I reject the right-wing economic policies advanced by Clinton, which are dictated entirely by the profit needs of American capitalism. The working class in the US and around the world did not create the global economic crisis and must not pay for it!
The SEP calls for a vast redistribution of wealth to secure basic social rights, including the right to a decent-paying job, quality education, affordable housing, universal health care, a dignified retirement and access to leisure time and culture.
The SEP advances a program not for the improvement of capitalism, but for the establishment of socialism. The social rights of the working class cannot be secured without a direct attack on the interests of the capitalist class and the domination of the financial aristocracy over economic life.
This means an end to the private ownership of the large corporations, with all those valued above $10 billion transformed into publicly owned enterprises under the democratic control of the working class. To provide quality jobs to all those who need them, the SEP calls for a multi-trillion-dollar public works program to rebuild infrastructure throughout the country.
We furthermore call for an end to the squandering of trillions of dollars on weaponry to conquer and oppress workers in other countries. Instead, trillions should be poured into social needs, to hire millions of doctors, nurses, teachers, construction workers and others to raise the material and cultural level of the population and put an end to poverty and want forever.
Regardless of who is elected in November, whether it is Trump or Clinton, the ruling class is preparing to escalate the assault on the working class. I call on all workers and young people to prepare for the struggles to come by supporting our campaign and joining the Socialist Equality Party.

LA RAZA INVADER JOSE GRANADOS-GUEVARA AND HIS MEX GANG HACKED TO DEATH A 14 YEAR OLD BOY IN TEXAS - MEXICANS ARE THE MOST VIOLENT CULTURE IN THE HEMISPHERE!

HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL

BE MURDERED, RAPED OR 


MOLESTED BY INVADING 


MEXICANS BEFORE WE 


PUSH THEIR INVASION 


BACK???


MS-13 Gang Leader 


Murdered 14-Year-Old Texas 


Boy With Machete



3

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER


HOUSTON, Texas – The leader of a Houston area MS-13 gang was convicted in a Texas criminal district court in connection with the murder of a 14-year-old Texas boy. The murder was carried out with the use of a machete as four gang members hacked the boy to death.

Jose Granados-Guevara, 23, was convicted by state district court Judge Terry Mlenniken following a three-day bench trial. The judge sentenced Granados-Guevara to spend 99 years in a state prison.
The victim, Jose Meraz, was taken by Granados-Guevara and three other gang members to a wooded area in the west part of Houston near Addicks Dam Road on September 15, 2014. The MS-13 gang members passed the machete
around as they killed the boy. Meraz was 
sentenced to death by Granados-Guevara 
after he refused to kill his own cousin as part 
of a gang ritual, the Houston 
Chronicle reported.
Meraz was reported to be an eighth-grade student from Thomas J. Stovall Middle School. That school is located on the north side of Houston in the Aldine Independent School District. He was said to be an entry level member of the MS-13 gang.
Court records obtained by Breitbart Texas revealed that Granados-Guevara was also charged with engaging in organized criminal activity and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon in an unrelated case. Those charges were eventually dismissed. Court records do not show Granados-Guevara’s place of birth or citizenship. However, an immigration hold has been placed on the now convicted murderer. He does not appear to have any prior criminal record in Harris County. The Houston Chronicle reported the man is a citizen of El Salvador but did not list his immigration status.
A defense attorney for the gang leader argued the fellow gang members who testified against their former leader could not be trusted to tell the truth.
Those gang members testified that Granados-Guevara ordered the murder and participated in the viscous attack.
The case was prosecuted by Harris County Assistant District Attorney Greg Houlton who told the jury, “Jose Meraz did not realize that every step he took into the woods was another step toward certain death.”
A witness told the judge he saw a car pull up to Meraz and a masked man jumped out and pulled him into the vehicle. That was the last time Meraz would be seen alive, the Houston Chronicle reported earlier this week.
The trial took place in the 185th Criminal District Court and was heard by a visiting judge.
Granados-Guevara will be eligible for parole in about thirty years.
Breitbart Texas has reported extensively on the criminal activities of MS-13 gang members across the U.S.
Bob Price serves as associate editor and senior political news contributor for Breitbart Texas and is a member of the original Breitbart Texas team. Follow him on Twitter@BobPriceBBTX.



BRETBART VIDEO OF THE INVADING HORDES….

THEY MURDER, RAPE, MOLEST, BEHEAD, MARKET THEIR HEROIN AND THEN GO VOTE DEM FOR MORE ANCHOR BABY WELFARE!.... THEY ALREADY GET OUR JOBS


Report: Released Criminal Aliens Committed Nearly 10 Times More Crimes Than Obama Admin. Told Congress







MEXICAN: AMERICA’S MURDERING UNREGISTERED DEMS

HALF THE MURDERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA ARE NOW BY MEX GANGS

CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE NATION, HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS

THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO AVOID PROSECUTION.

MORE THAN 90% OF THE MURDERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CITY OF LOS ANGELES ARE MEXICANS.

OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED (MURDER) CRIMINALS IN MEX-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES, 186 ARE MEXICANS.


SEE POLICE IMAGES OF THESE WANTED MEXICANS HERE:




 LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILLARIA ENDORSED BY NARCOMEX. HER